The Whole Purpose of Redpill, Game, PUA, etc.

Swank writes:

A 48 year old woman cheated on him.

Oh no.

Who cares?

Why would he possibly care?

For 18 years of marriage, his wife was a cold fish in bed and refused to do anything even slightly kinky, either oral sex (giving or receiving).

A RETARD.

And he didn’t always have status. The article states that he struggled financially for years.

But sure, the exception disproves the general rule I guess.

Hang on a second. Swank says all a man has to do is get some status, gain 20 pounds, gain 10 pounds of muscle and find someone with similar interests and then it’s home free and he can say and do whatever the Hell you want to.

Swank say this guy had no status.

He was a millionaire. He owned his own tech company. He lived in million dollar home. How is it that a millionaire living in a million dollar home is struggling financially? And he wasn’t struggling financially his whole life. His sex life sucked from the start. He simply did not turn on his wife. Why? She was turned on by other men instead, other than her husband. Why?

She was in league with a bunch of other cheating wives who were all cheating on their “lame husbands” with “studs.” Why did these women see their husbands as lame? What was wrong with them? What did the studs they were cheating on have that their husbands lacked? Why did these women see their harems of studs to cheat with as Alpha fucks and their husbands as Beta bucks? Here the dynamic is obviously working.

Swank cannot answer any of these questions.

Liberals cannot answer any of these questions.

Feminists cannot answer any of these questions.

All of them just mouth stupid platitudes.

Feminists say nice guys aren’t nice (not true), and that’s why women hate them. This is a flat-out lie and is an example of classic female self-deception that they have deceived themselves into believing is true.

Feminists say, hey incels, all you have to do is get some clean clothes, shower and bathe regularly, brush your teeth, practice good hygiene and have some halfway decent social skills and you are home free! The babes are just going to fall right into your damn lap. You think that’s going to work?

The whole purpose of Redpill, Game, PUA and all the other more or less evil bullshit is to try to figure out why the Hell this is happening. Why are the husbands seen as lame? What makes them lame? Why are these women not turned on by their husbands? What are the husbands lacking? What could the husbands do to make themselves more attractive? What did the studs they were cheating on have these these husband cucks did not have? What was it about their boytoys that turned these women on?

Are there other groups out there that offer men relationship advise on how to maximally meet their needs and desires in relationships with women while keeping things on as much of an even keel as possible much of the time and having a minimum amount of stress, drama, chaos, negativity and relationship downtime and crisis as possible that are maybe not as evil as the Game, PUA and Redpill? If so, fine, bring them on. A morally grounded relationship guide for men would be a great thing.

One problem is that the typical groups you go to about this stuff are full of women and feminist men and they give flat out horrible advise to men who are having relationship troubles.

Let me give you an example. In Reddit/relationships, a husband walks in on his wife down on her knees sucking two men’s cocks. The guy goes to R/relationships. What advise do the women and feminist men have? Get therapy.

Get therapy!

Does that sound like good advice in the circumstances? Come on.

I am having a hard time seeing why these movements are so evil. Why do the feminists hate them so much? Because it means we men are catching on to women’s bullshit and games and trying to outsmart them so they can’t con us, manipulate us and screw us over so much? Is that why? Because men are wising up, learning women’s tricks and how to beat them at their own game? Feminists are furious that we are catching on to women’s scammy manipulating bullshit, figuring out how to deal with it and coming up with a bunch of scammy manipulative bullshit of our own to throw their way so as to confuse them.

That’s really what it’s all about, isn’t it?

Oh no! The men are catching on! We can’t have that!

Before we women were fighting a ridiculous one-sided war against unarmed men who declared unilateral ceasefire. It was a massacre. The men were getting creamed. It was all good.

Now the men have walked away from the table, stockpiled weapons, broken all of our codes, completely infiltrated our forces with spies and double agents, and are now fighting back with some weapons that are so brand new we women can’t even figure out how they work!

Oh no! A fair fight!  A woman’s worst nightmare!

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

10 thoughts on “The Whole Purpose of Redpill, Game, PUA, etc.”

  1. “Not too long ago, -after years of struggling financially, my software company, with a valuation in the billions, had its IPO. We did very well.- We lived in a $1 million dream house ”

    Read your own article.

    I understand you want to believe the NY post spin of the story.

    This story, if it’s even portrayed accurately, is the exception that proves the rule. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t make for interesting copy.

    But sure keep making the simple complicated. Any excuse to avoid tangible real work. Par for most “self-help.”

  2. Lol, 99% of AM female profiles were fake. http://www.extremetech.com/internet/213019-new-analysis-shows-over-99-percent-of-the-women-on-ashley-madison-were-fake.

    The average age of the men was 59. http://advisorhubinc.com/advisor-ashley-madison-demographics-revealed/

    A ton of .gov email addresses were found. So disproportionate amount of powerful people.

    Almost 75% have a college degree and the average household income > 100k. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2014/05/01/the-economics-of-adultery/

    So, overwhelmingly, it was rich, powerful, older, men were bored and looking for something better.

    Swank is right.

    1. “So, overwhelmingly, it was rich, powerful, older, men were bored and looking for something better.”

      That’s not exactly how the real world works. Older wealthy men looking for something better don’t pay for Ashley Madison. They pay for sex with college-age whores instead.

      The typical Ashley Madison member is an older, relatively wealthy married man, looking for a serious relationship with another old woman because his own wife transformed into a disgusting old hag who can’t stop bitching about how horrible her life has become as a result of her morbid obesity, leaving her husband no choice but to look elsewhere for near-platonic friendship.

      If those supposedly wealthy older men were merely after sex with hot babes, then there is a simple way to get what they want. If they didn’t go the prostitute route, even though they could afford it, that means they felt guilty about cheating on their wives with hot young girls, and instead decided to look for women their own age to get a modicum of distraction from their disgusting partners.

      The majority of men at or about the age of 50 can’t get young women unless they pay for it. In contrast, any 50 year old woman who is not fat and knows how use make-up properly can easily convince men in their 20s and 30s to fuck her without too much effort being needed on her part. There are plenty of young men horny enough to fuck fat and old pussy.

      So it’s considerably easier for women to cheat than for men, regardless of age. Older women don’t need sites like Ashley Madison to find a young stud willing to fuck them. Men only need it if they are stupid enough not to use prostitutes for moral reasons.

      Women are much more likely to cheat than men. And this holds true regardless of their age or marital status. Female initiated divorces are just the tip of the iceberg of this much-denied reality.

      1. The majority of men at or about the age of 50 can’t get young women unless they pay for it.

        For the most part, this is true. Young women are incredibly hostile towards me, and when I was their age, they wouldn’t leave me alone. I can’t even talk to most of them. Many get mad if I even look at them. This morning a young hottie got mad at me for holding a door open for her. I guess I wasn’t worthy.

        Last few years I have gotten some 26-29 year old women. But it was hard as Hell to get them, and I had to walk through a minefield of same-aged hostile cunts to find the 4 leaf clovers.

        You need to be Chad (for your age) and especially you need very good Game. Bad Boy Game works into your 50’s. There are a lot of variations: Aging Roue, Former Criminal, Mystery Man/Spy, Older Outlaw Type, Rebel Survivor, Old Player, Ex-Rockstar, Father Figure. I suppose I run all those types of Game.

        I also run Pity Game, Friendzone Game…Damn there are so many Game sub-varieties.

        Otherwise, money, status, fame or power would very much help out, but that’s all probably another way of paying for it.

      2. That’s not exactly how the real world works.

        That is exactly how the real world works.

        Older wealthy men looking for something better don’t pay for Ashley Madison. They pay for sex with college-age whores instead.

        They do both.

        looking for a serious relationship with another old woman

        Lol. Good one.

        The majority of men at or about the age of 50 can’t get young women unless they pay for it.

        There is no such thing as ‘not paying for it.’ Either you must invest time, which is indirect money, or you must invest money…either way, you’re paying for it. Paying directly is low-class, though.

        This rich douche bought a ton of prostitutes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Belfort. It’s not because he was a ‘loser with women.’ It’s also not because he had an ugly mean wife.

        The rich and powerful buy women because they are so powerful that they can view people as objects. Is that evil? Sure. But it’s the truth.

        any 50 year old woman

        Can convince a loser 20-30 year old to bang her because they don’t have better options. Sure. So what.

        Women are much more likely to cheat than men

        Contra every study or investigation into the issue.

        Women like status. Maybe you haven’t seen the effect a guy buying up the entire room has on women yet.

        1. “There is no such thing as ‘not paying for it.’ Either you must invest time, which is indirect money, or you must invest money…either way, you’re paying for it. Paying directly is low-class, though.”

          Actually, it’s not low class. It may be considered low class to fuck streetwalkers, but there is nothing low class about paying for call girls/escorts. In fact, they cater to upper class audiences. Invest time? The average 50 year old man could spend the remainder of life talking to young women and achieve nothing. Unless a monetary transaction takes place, his chances are pretty much non-existent.

          Yes, there are older men who occasionally succeed with younger women if they put in enough time and effort; some are successful enough to compete with young studs. But I’m taking about the average man, not statistical outliers.

          Both sexes tend to prefer youthful partners once they’re past a certain age. But men have a much stronger preference for youthful looking partners than women. This is not speculation but proven fact. It’s rare for older men to prefer sex partners their own age or older. If they have money to spend on young women, it’s even less common.

          “They do both.”

          I don’t think so. Most men stop caring about less attractive older women when they can get young ones.

          70% of men who cheated on Ashley Madison did so with women that were either the same age or older than themselves. As you wrote, the average age of active male users on Ashley Madison is 59 years old. Older men looking for sex don’t date women in their late 50s. They just don’t. That kind of behavior has nothing to do with biology. It’s plausible that sex was just as afterthought to them in order to get revenge on their wives, and not the main motivator. They were probably just trying to escape loneliness and get away from their wives. If they were mainly looking for sex, they wouldn’t be spending so much time on women that they don’t find attractive.

          On the other hand, the average age of active female Ashley Madison users is 41 and they almost exclusively dated men younger than themselves. This means that the average female user was fucking young studs, whereas the average male user was dating women older than himself (if he was dating at all). This makes no sense except if one recognizes that most of these men weren’t motivated by sex in the first place.

          “Contra every study or investigation into the issue.”

          The largest studies do appear to show that men are more likely to cheat than women but these studies do not take into account the female tendency towards deception. To say that every investigation has shown that men are more likely to cheat than women is wrong. Some studies reached the contrary conclusion. It’s also well known that women are less likely to admit to cheating. Not to mention that women almost never get caught when they do cheat.

          Some sources:
          http://www.yourtango.com/201172881/women-more-likely-cheat-men-heres-why
          http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/05/women-lie-untruths-human
          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161706/Almost-women-cheat-caught-partners—fifth-men-DO-out.html

        2. “Actually, it’s not low class.”

          Yes, it is. American elites are low-class. Being a gentleman is about more than money, but we get ahead of ourselves. Most of the people wandering around today aren’t men, so who could expect them to be gentlemen.

          Unless a monetary transaction takes place, his chances are pretty much non-existent.

          That is because the average 50 year old man doesn’t have education and money and his body is now failing him. Those aren’t the AM users, in case you didn’t notice.

          “Not once across all ages and countries … did females show a preference for males significantly younger than male preferences for females” and that there was a “consistent cross-cultural preference by women for at least same-age or significantly older men”

          Men acquire status over a lifetime.

          I don’t think so.

          That’s nice. You have no clue.

          Rich people are more likely to cheat in every walk of life in any way they can — because they can.
          http://news.berkeley.edu/2012/02/27/greed/

          The only way a woman is going to keep a guy with his head screwed on right is if a) she makes more than him b) she comes from a family more powerful than his or him and c) proves herself indispensable to his life (hard to do).

          “70% of men who cheated on Ashley Madison did so with women that were either the same age or older than themselves”

          Citation please. If 99% of the women were fake and the women who actually signed up had an average age 18 years younger than the men….

          “Some studies reached the contrary conclusion.”

          Yes, the bad studies that certainly APPEAR to be pro-fem “we do everything that men do” propaganda.

  3. Oh no! A fair fight! A woman’s worst nightmare!

    Women are like Jews. A few of them are great people, and most are at least decent, but watch out because they all want your money and the law is on their side. Also their mom is a total bitch.

  4. Looks, adequate personal hygiene, earnings potential, and
    decisiveness are EVERYTHING. Also overlooked is the Astrological chart. It can tell you whether you have charisma with women. Some “bad boys” have good charts. Some “good guys” have poor charts. I’m not taking about tabloid Astrology, I’m talking about a deep study.

    If you are a flop with chicks. (“I’ve been that way since 1966.”) You might want to investigate SUICIDE. Only, don’t take anyone else with you. They didn’t do anything to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.