Sexual Orientation Ratios among Men, with a Discussion and Look to the Future

The only other sexual orientation survey I am aware of was done on medical students in Australia by a famous sexologist. An anonymous questionnaire was used, but later testing in the lab showed that people’s responses lined up very well with how they rated themselves. Using this scale:

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual
0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual

The Australian survey showed that 62% of all men scored 100-0 or completely heterosexual. 38% of all men had at least some attraction to other men. But only 7% of men reacted maximally to men in the lab, 6% of men leaned gay, and only 2% were completely gay:

50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual: 1%
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual: 1%
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual: 1%
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual: 1%
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual: 1%
0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual: 2%

Fully 94% of men reacted maximally to women, and 93% leaned straight. Other studies by the same scientist showed that 25% of men had some sort of homosexual experience in adolescence, so I guess circle jerks are more common than I thought.

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual: 62%
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual: 17%
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual: 12%
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual: 6%
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual: 2%
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual: 1%

Amazingly, only 1% of the men were fully bisexual, and the rate of strong bisexuals (60-40’s or 40-60’s is also very low).

This goes with reports we get out of the gay community that there are not many male full bisexuals. The same reports say that many young men in their 20’s identify as bisexual and may have a wife or a girlfriend, but they spend most of their socializing time in gay hangouts. The same people say that when they watch men in their 20’s who identify as bisexual over time, after several years, quite a few of them convert over to completely gay.

This stands to reason, as I have met some obviously bisexual men in their 20’s with girlfriends who struck me as completely gay.

Every time I was around them, there was a very strong sexual vibe (Arthur), and in one case (KL), the guy was constantly making weird gay insinuations (he was pretty much trying to fuck me 100% of the time I was friends with him) and it was incredibly annoying and disturbing.

This is also typical of gay men – their insane persistence. The gay men that I have known who liked me pretty much never stopped trying to screw me the whole time I knew them. If they started out coming onto me, they simply never gave up no matter how many times I told them no or got mad at them. I think there is something wrong with these people. The only way to stop this behavior is to get very aggressive, threaten or menace them, and especially end the friendship altogether.

I have also heard from some of my straight friends that the gay men they befriended pretty much never quit after they started coming onto them. Once they start it up, they just can’t seem to knock it off. They don’t seem to have an off switch.

I wonder if this is behind a lot of gay-bashings? I am not advocating beating people up, but a gay man who can’t stop pestering a straight man is seriously asking for a knuckle sandwich. There was a commenter on here who insisted that attempted seductions were behind a lot of gay-bashings. What often happened was a gay man came on hard to a straight man, and the straight man took offense and assaulted the gay man. I don’t like to blame the victim, but…

I worked with Arthur, and I never saw him look at a woman once the whole time I worked there. We would be eating lunch in the lunchroom, a beautiful woman would walk in, and Arthur would not even look up at her. It was as if a ghost had walked into the room. She was simply not there at all.

My mother said that before she got married, she worked in San Fransisco, and there was a man in the office that no one could figure out. Finally the woman got it. My mother said, “He never looked at a woman, not even one time, ever.”

This follows.

I have known and worked with a number of gay men, and one surefire way to spot them is that they never look at women, ever. Women are either ghosts, or in the case of one gay boss, part of the furniture, carpet or ceiling.

With KL, I must say that I never heard him talk about women even one time for even one second, and he was constantly insinuating creepy upsetting gay bullshit. I used to go out on drives with him in his van and he never looked at a woman even one time.

Lessons? How to spot a gay man:

Gay men never look at women.

and

Gay men never talk about women.

Based on this, these two “bisexual” men in their late 20’s were simply closeted gay men with beard girlfriends. Which goes along with gay common wisdom above that many bisexual young men are simply closeted gay men who are afraid to come out all the way and are frankly just lying to themselves.

It is also interesting that the overwhelming majority of men who have sexual interest in men or who have some bisexual attraction lean straight, often very heavily straight.

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual: 62%
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual: 17%
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual: 12%
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual: 6%
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual: 2%
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual: 1%

What this shows is that men who lean gay are not common at all. No more than 6% of all men lean this way. Also the overwhelming majority of men who have bisexual attraction lean straight. This means that leaning heterosexual (93%) is the overwhelming preference for nearly all men. Gay men are nothing more than a sideshow.

Probably the vast majority of the 38% of men who have some attraction to men will never act on their urges. If you are a 90-10 or an 80-20, why bother? These men are as attracted to women as any other man, and they only have low attraction to males. In a homophobic society most of them would be exclusively or almost exclusively straight for their entire lives, and why shouldn’t they?

As you can see, 38% of men have some biological tendency towards homosexual behavior. That’s an awful lot of men. But as the Cultural Left out and out promotes and celebrates homosexuality, more and more of that 38% can quite possibly feel it is ok to act on some of their lesser urges.  In a society such as ours that screams that being gay and bi is the greatest thing since peanut butter and jelly, it is obvious to me that more and more of that 38% are going to start engaging in some level of homosexual behavior. In other words, the rate of homosexual behavior among men is going to rise. More men are going to be doing this stuff.

I honestly do not see what is so groovy about all of this. The gay and gay-leaning men who truly cannot help their orientation should be supported completely at least as far as their orientation goes. You can hardly hate a man for something he can’t help.

Nevertheless, homosexuality is bad for society, male homosexuality particularly so. If it’s kept to a minimum, society can easily cope with the dysfunctions, issues and costs of this group and really it is no big problem. Society can absorb it and move along. Encouraging and promoting homosexual behavior is encouraging and promoting something that is bad for society. What’s the point? Why do it? What’s the upside? The Cultural Left doesn’t make sense. Why are they trying to harm society?

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

17 thoughts on “Sexual Orientation Ratios among Men, with a Discussion and Look to the Future”

  1. I guess they are trying to create total acceptance of homosexuality and freedom for everybody to engage in homosexual sex if they desire…if its totally okay and accepted then why not? I guess this is their logic and they aren’t trying to harm society.

    Interesting that patriarchal chimps are more aggressive and I guess more sexually restricted whereas matriarchal bonobos are peaceful but with lots of promiscuity and bisexuality. I wonder if that is just a coincidence or if it has something to tell us about the tendencies of males and females or of male and female rule.

    1. When females rule everything goes backwards and everyone become lazy and promiscuous.

      I am starting to like the idea of Female Rule more and more now.

      Males value order, efficiency, independence, honor, and restraint.

      Screw that Prussian bullshit. Who cares if the trains run on time? Give me the Summer of Love brother!

      1. I (a Western European, not an American) agree with Robert Lindsay – here in the West, we work way too hard for our own good and own a lot of unnecessary stuff.

        And why do we work so much? so we can have bigger cars than the average guy, and a larger home than the average guy. It’s a zero sum game. People don’t care about stuff in itself, they only want to be richer than the average guy, richer than their neighbour.

        If it’s true that Female Rule means that everyone works less and everyone is poorer and there is more promiscuity, then Female Rule is welcome.

        Also, Male Rule means lots of wars which is disastrous. The real problem with female rule is that they’d never make it possible to control immigration. Then again, the reason that here in Europe we’re getting invaded by immigrants is the chaos caused by Western military interventionism.

  2. Looking at some profile of gay guys on dating sites, some of them look redneck and straight, like the kind of guys that would hate gays. It’s so funny to see such pictures pop up on there.

    So many people are gay whom if you saw in person would not think so, and it’s shocking to see so many gays, especially in a conservative state.

    1. They had one gay profile with this guy with a camoflogue hunting cap, redneck grin with his tongue slightly out, and some slight facial hair. 😆

      His name was deerslayer.

      1. Can you imagine a guy like that, and for that matter a lot of those guys (who don’t seem gay) sucking a cock? 😆 They sure do, if they’re gay, and probably do more than that.

    2. Gay people are generally not that confusing. After a while I can usually spot them if not right away. They may look like straight men, but most of them don’t act like straight men. Most of the gay men that I come across are at least somewhat effeminate. And the “straight-acting” ones are sort of like “soft” straight man. A gay man who acts truly macho super-masculine is a rare bird indeed, but they do exist. I saw one in a video once.

      1. I get the opposite impression from lesbians. Some of them do look feminine, but even the ones who look feminine, have a certain masculinity about them, infallibly. I once innocently told a bunch of lesbians that they were so masculine, and they flew into a weird rage that suprised me.

        1. Almost all lesbians are pretty dykey. A truly feminine lesbian barely exists. I have never met one myself and all the ones that are even partly feminine seem like they screw guys.

      2. ROBERT

        Well there was Jeff Stryker and Larry the gay waiter was always talking about his videos.

        This was Elvis-lookalike gay porn star who had that Feud with Kulak’s Woodshed and sued about the dildo mold.

        He was a short white guy from Illinois with a John Holmes sized penis who always spoke in a hokey Texas accent on film-“Yeah, suck dat dick” “Take dat big cock all da way into your ass”.

        1. Look man I am banning you again, ok? You came here and immediately you starting picking fights with people. I recommend a therapist. You might have a personality disorder. You don’t seem to be capable of modifying your behavior, which is about the definition of a personality disorder right there.

  3. What is bad for. society is promoting selfishness and the top 1% owning everything Even . If voluntary most figures for gays are 1 to 10 percent of the population . There. is. no danger. of the population. going. into to sharp. decline. from. gay. behavior True. if you. had an economic system. that. was not based. on.mindless. consumption. and vulgar. consumerism the. world. could. easily. support. a population. at least. twice the size of the current population. Drugs are bad and the worst is the war on drugs which treats an illness like a criminal offense .Selfishness. is what leads to drug abuse alcoholism gambling and financial. collapse .

  4. Do you know how many men were tested? And how exactly do they figure out where they fall on the scale of attraction. I mean I can’t think of a way that they can other testing out what they keep aroused by, such as the porn they get aroused by. (Straight porn, gay porn, lesbian porn)

      1. how exactly did they test? Other than just arousal to porn or whatever. There’s more to sexual orientation than just arousal, such as emotions, and romantic attraction. Also such as who they find more attractive (either men or women) How did they find out about that stuff?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.