How Does Weimar Germany Validate the Theory of Cultural Marxism?

Ben Steigmann writes:

I found this to be interesting: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/24/sexual-decadence-weimar-germany/

Yes, but during that era, there were not any Marxist Jews in Germany preaching decadence and depravity for the German Gentiles in order to facilitate a Communist Revolution! This is what the crazy Cultural Marxist theory would suggest.

Yes, there were Jews who formed a short-lived Communist government in Bavaria in 1920 which was quickly overthrown. There was also the Communist Party of Germany the German Social Democratic Party. The Communists and the socialists despised each other and often fought in the streets. Strangely enough, proto-fascists were also very active politically during this time, and they also fought with both parties of the Left in the streets all the time. And government itself was basically paralyzed.

Neither the Communists nor the Social Democrats nor certainly the Fascists had anything to do with the mass cultural and sexual depravity of the decade. Surely the fascists and the Communists opposed it, as both tend to be puritanical, and I doubt if the Social Democrats had much to say about it either, as this was before the Left became a Cultural Left. Back then, socialists didn’t have much to say about culture as they tended to form all of their analysis around class based economics and felt that any other analysis was not productive.

First of all, Cultural Marxist theory starts with the Frankfurt School Jews after WW2. These decadent Jews were German Jews during the 1920’s. Yes, this era during which there was heavy Jewish influence was characterized by extreme cultural degeneration and depravity, but the Jews were not doing it to weaken the Gentiles in order to facilitate Communist Revolution. The Jews themselves were succumbing as much to this degeneration and depravity as the Gentiles were.

How does the example of Weimar Germany elucidate the Theory of Cultural Marxism?

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

36 thoughts on “How Does Weimar Germany Validate the Theory of Cultural Marxism?”

  1. I have nothing against having the proverbial safety net per se. but the Political Class has changed the safety net into a fishing net.

  2. Did you know in Weimer Germany, there were plenty of blacks running around? They gave the German prostitutes venereal diseases. There was also a flourishing towel head community. When the Nazi’s came to power, they DID NOT round up blacks as they
    did Jews. There was even a black S.S. division.

  3. Nothing new under the sun, the Romans began relaxing rules for citizenship, IIRC eventually extending it even to the Germanic barbarians increasingly settling in Roman territory. Anyone remember how that turned out for them?

    Ditto attempts to LOWER voting ages throughout the Civilized World! I admit when I was a kid, I thought it would be wonderful for kids to force their Will on adults. Now I am an adult in a country bent over by perpetual children, and I hate it!

  4. Look Beast. I am deleting this post. This is a socialist blog. You cannot print anti-socialist propaganda on here. I will delete it and if you keep on doing it, I will ban you.

  5. This is completely insane far rightwing anti-socialist conspiracy theory. I am deleting this comment, Ben. You need to stop making comments like this. You’re a reactionary, Ben. Have you ever wondered what you are doing on a socialist blog?

  6. Cultural degeneracy is only the surface. The idea is that these values are arbitrary. A quick summary of the FS:

    “Social sciences, in requiring a generalization from experience, are different than the natural sciences, in that the researcher himself only has the framework of his own ideology and history to evaluate his observations; so, the interpretations will conform to those ideas.

    The “critical school” is similar to pragmatism but with a focus on “ideology.” one compares the society’s dominant ideology with the reality of that society. And in the observed divergences, one may come close to finding the “truth” of that society.”

    It’s the realization that many norms and ideals we hold are essentially like rules in a game that determine who gets what and when. Most non-physics facts (read: social science) are essentially validations or refutations of certain ideologies. However, they aren’t necessarily the facts on the ground.

    And this realization about the social sciences came after an earlier wave. The law used to be based off of community prejudice which embedded itself into precedent. Over time this community prejudice became so entrenched that judges recounted these principles as ‘fact.’

    It wasn’t until a jew, Brandeis, began marshaling “social science facts” (playing the West’s preoccupation with science against its preoccupation with…prejudice, for lack of a better term), that we saw the first serious challenge in this game.

    Generalizing further…

    Civilization is dividing resources and justifying inequity in that distribution. “Culture” is the game everyone must play that determines who gets what, when.

  7. I wrote a paper once for a history class. It was inspired by a book written by a Mormon woman about her church.

    One of the forces that pushed the early Mormon church to adopt polygamy was the sexual imbalance in New England and Upstate New York. While about as many boys were born as girls, many of the men were lost at sea, either permanently or just for years at a time.

    I left part of my evidence out of the paper because it would have been too unPC. It was a page of photos of the wives of Brigham Young. There were no faces I’d want to wake up next to.

    There was a house of refuge for women who didn’t want to be wives in Salt Lake City. It was established by some non-Mormon group for years before the feds sent in troops to de-polygamize Utah. The Mormon powers that were did nothing visible about it. No woman ever went there to claim refuge.

    The first female physician in the U.S. was a Mormon woman who accomplished her studies during the polygamist period.

    So, women are OK with polygamy.

  8. I don’t think that’s true. I think recently South Korea had a woman prime minister. I saw little evidence women were treated like doormats there. Most were highly educated and seeking a career.

  9. As I stated in another comment on another post, cultural liberals are non-conformists. On the other hand, Communists are like military people. Of course, the two thing don’t go together very well.

    1. Interesting those who claim to hate oppression only burn American “capitalist pig” flags. Who killed more? US or USSR?

      1. Robert would probably say capitalism has killed 100 times more than communism. I won’t comment right now on whether that’s true.

  10. Of course, that’s not to say that cultural liberals cannot be conformists. Many in the US army and many college professors are culturally liberal, but in no way “soft” or conformist in regard to standards. They might have strict rules regarding grades, class attendance, high standards etc.., but otherwise feel people should be free to do what they want.

    Nonetheless, as far as Weimar goes, and most Communists in history, the Communists have tended to be puritancial and conformist.

    1. Of course, though, the US army probably has more puritanical types than the “free-thinker” types. Social conservatives tend to be drawn toward the military and/or religion.

    2. Sorry meant to say (typo) “Many in the US army and many college professors are culturally liberal, but in no way “soft” or non-conformist in regard to standards.”

        1. What I mean, is even the most bleeding heart professor wants his students to come on time, do quality work, and be respectful in class. Well, a few professors are soft on some of these things though, but not most.

        2. OK, but the “freedom” part is explicit encouragement TO disobey rules and schedules…And if he says, “Disobey all rules except mine”, he lays bare the Liberal hypocrisy!

      1. I should’ve provided an example of the Universities suppressing majority rights to appease the minority.
        http://newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/kristine-marsh/2015/08/26/media-mock-student-challenging-duke-univ-pornographic-lgbt

        An institution is mocking a Christian in a (formerly?) Christian country for NOT WANTING TO be forced to read queer porn, and they mock him for everything from being a virgin to this prize-winning line, “If you refuse to confront images that offend you, you simply do not belong at a university.”

        RIGHT! Universities CONFRONT what upsets them, rather than ban it.
        that, sir, is rich coming from liberals who cannot abide –

        -the Confederate Flag
        -Conservative speakers
        -the American Flag
        -the Bible
        -Christians
        -Images of aborted babies

        But queer porn is a must-see?
        Oh, and for extra Does Not Compute Points, Neil Gaiman, hardly a conformist, joined in mocking the student instead of defending the free-thinking.

        1. FYI: The Nazis killed the handicapped, and supported abortion, that is, for the inferior. 😆

          Also, yes, Iv’e encountered asshole left wing professors,especially in history, philosophy, and geology, No doubt they are at war. However, I also had an douchebag right wing teacher in my rural high school. He gave the students a lecture on how the peace sign was an inverted cross (mockery), and he had the nerve to suggest his general level students parents mothers smoked pot while pregnant. No joke. 😆

        2. i think both the far left and far right are being douchebags, no doubt, pushing an agenda on everyone. It’s especially bad when they target the youth, or college students.

        3. I think most of the left wing tyranny can be blamed on radical atheists. They’re main enemy is God, and they want no God at all. It’s not enough to just say, “Well, I want seperation of church and state.” They want to force atheism, evolution and whatnot on everyone against their will.

        4. Yes, and ironically, pushing Atheism, from Government on down, leaves a vacuum for the Moslem Cult to fill. Some even push the Moslem Cult explicitly BECAUSE it “fights Christianity”. They see the Moslem Cult as “freeing” women and queers because Christianity “oppresses” them?
          Clearly, they read an abridged version of the Quran.

          To me, that has all the sense of drinking a pitcher of gingivitis because it fights toothpaste, but that’s the kind of Nation of Uniform Idiots we’re raising nowadays!

          Quran TLDR Version: Women are property, to wear heat-retaining KKK-looking outfits, and queers get rocks thrown at them until they die! Oh, and you can rob and murder non-Moslems, and even take them as slaves. If they are married, the act of taking them as slaves makes them single again for your pleasure/convenience!

          It’s like COBRA from my childhood made their own “religion”! And they’ll KILL anyone who says it’s not peaceful!

        5. You can kind of get a feeling for the type of society the Left wants to live in by what they indoctrinate the children with…

          As to the queer porn comic, I think they should all pullout the current edition of say, Spider-Man and discuss THAT instead, with or without saying, “I found something more intelligent to occupy my mind/time than queer porn!”

        6. Quran TLDR Version: Women are property, to wear heat-retaining KKK-looking outfits, and queers get rocks thrown at them until they die! Oh, and you can rob and murder non-Moslems, and even take them as slaves. If they are married, the act of taking them as slaves makes them single again for your pleasure/convenience!

          As I said in another post, all muslims need to be thrown out. We just can’t trust them to not blow us up, and thier culture is too intolerant, even surprassing what the religious right wants.

        7. You can kind of get a feeling for the type of society the Left wants to live in by what they indoctrinate the children with…

          As to the queer porn comic, I think they should all pullout the current edition of say, Spider-Man and discuss THAT instead, with or without saying, “I found something more intelligent to occupy my mind/time than queer porn!”

          Integration with blacks will work (can work assuming the ghetto ones are rooted out), but maybe not with gays.

        8. How will we root out the ghetto ones, considering that ALL Blacks join as one to riot over the killing of ONE thug, won’t the rooting out of the entire bad Black population–assuming we have eyepieces or something to tell the difference–cause them to burn the whole nation?

          The worst part is? it is the Liberals’ fault in the first place. Integration did worse than just mix whites and blacks, it mixed Blacks and blacks!
          http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2010/10/20/the_multicultural_cult_part_ii/page/full
          Thomas Sowell, one of those “Not Black Enough” blacks, explains the difference between the fully acculturated ones and the animals who attack cops and get shot!

          This is the relevant paragraph, in case you don’t feel like reading the actual article:
          The blacks who moved to these cities were of the same race as those who were already there, but they were not the same in their culture, values and behavior. No one complained of this more bitterly than the blacks already living in these cities, who saw the newcomers as harbingers of a worse life for all blacks.

        9. How will we root out the ghetto ones, considering that ALL Blacks join as one to riot over the killing of ONE thug, won’t the rooting out of the entire bad Black population–assuming we have eyepieces or something to tell the difference–cause them to burn the whole nation?

          I don’t know really what to say about this one, other than we have to clean out the gangs, as my plan originally intended. If people’s feelings are hurt, then well, they’ll have to get over it. But at least I’m allowing people to be born, giving them a chance to choose good or bad, before distributing justice.

  11. During the Weimar era, jews controlled most of the press and media. They used this to wage war against their enemies, all non-jews. Just like they do now in the western world. Diluting the native population via mass immigration and destroying the native’s cohesion via destruction of established culture and morale values (materialistic/hedonistic world view preached by popular media) is all a part of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.