"How Islam Creates Psychopaths," by Nicolai Sennels

The eminent Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels has studied the ideology of Islam and how it affects Muslims. He has concluded it creates monsters/psychopaths Here he writes:

How Islam Creates Sociopaths

by Nicolai Sennels

Psychopathic people and behavior are found within all cultures and religions. But one tops them all — by many lengths. The daily mass killings, terror, persecutions and family executions committed by the followers of Islam are nauseating, and the ingenuity behind the attacks — always looking for new and more effective ways of killing and terrorizing people — is astonishing: hijacking jumbo jets and flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one’s own body, using model airplanes as drones, attaching large rotating blades to pickup trucks and using them as human lawn movers, killing family members with acid or fire, hanging people publicly from cranes in front of cheering crowds, etc. It makes one ask oneself: what creates such lack of empathy and almost playful and creative attitude towards murdering perceived enemies? This is a question for psychologists like me.

Studying the Muslim mind

Nobody is born a mass murderer, a rapist or a violent criminal. So what is it in the Muslim culture that influence their children in a way that make so relatively many Muslims harm other people? As a psychologist in a Danish youth prison, I had a unique chance to study the mentality of Muslims. 70 percent of youth offenders in Denmark have a Muslim background. I was able to compare them with non-Muslim clients from the same age group with more or less the same social background. I came to the conclusion that Islam and Muslim culture have certain psychological mechanisms that harm people’s development and increase criminal behavior. I am, of course, aware that Muslims are different, and not all Muslims follow the Quran’s violent and perverted message and their prophet’s equally embarrassing example. But as with all other religions, Islam also influences its followers and the culture they live in. One could talk about two groups of psychological mechanisms that both singly and combined increase violent behavior. One group is mainly connected with religion, which aims at indoctrinating Islamic values in children as early as possible and with whatever means necessary, including violence and intimidation. One can understand a Muslim parent’s concern about his offspring’s religious choices, because the Sharia orders the death penalty for their children should they pick another religion than their parents. The other group of mechanisms are more cultural and psychological. These cultural psychological mechanisms are a natural consequence of being influenced by a religion like Islam and stemming from a 1,400 year old tribal society with very limited freedom to develop beyond what the religion allows.

Classical Brainwashing Methods in the Upbringing

Brainwashing people into believing or doing things against their own human nature — such as hating or even killing innocents they do not even know — is traditionally done by combining two things: pain and repetition. The conscious infliction of psychological and physical suffering breaks down the person’s resistance to the constantly repeated message. Totalitarian regimes use this method to reform political dissidents. Armies in less civilized countries use it to create ruthless soldiers, and religious sects all over the world use it to fanaticize their followers. During numerous sessions with more than a hundred Muslim clients, I found that violence and repetition of religious messages are prevalent in Muslim families. Muslim culture simply does not have the same degree of understanding of human development as in civilized societies, and physical pain and threats are therefore often the preferred tool to raise children. This is why so many Muslim girls grow up to accept violence in their marriage, and why Muslim boys grow up to learn that violence is acceptable. And it is the main reason why nine out of ten children removed from their parents by authorities in Copenhagen are from immigrant families. The Muslim tradition of using pain and intimidation as part of disciplining children are also widely used in Muslim schools — also in the West. Combined with countless repetitions of Quranic verses in Islamic schools and families, all this makes it very difficult for children to defend themselves against being indoctrinated to follow the Quran, even if it is against secular laws, logic, and the most basic understanding of compassion. And as we know from so many psychological studies, whatever a child is strongly influenced by at that age takes an enormous personal effort to change later in life. It is no wonder that Muslims in general, in spite of Islam’s inhumane nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other religious group.

Four Enabling Psychological Factors

Not only does a traditional Islamic upbringing resemble classical brainwashing methods, but also, the culture it generates cultivates four psychological characteristics that further enable and increase violent behavior. These four mental factors are

  • anger
  • lack of self-confidence
  • no sense of responsibility for oneself
  • intolerance

When it comes to anger, Western societies widely agree that it is a sign of weakness. Uncontrolled explosions of this unpleasant feeling are maybe the fastest way of losing face, especially in Northern countries, and though angry people may be feared, they are never respected. In Muslim culture, anger is much more accepted, and being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and source of social status. We even see ethnic Muslim groups or countries proudly declare whole days of anger, and use expressions such as “holy anger” — a term that seems contradictory in peaceful cultures. In Western societies, the ability to handle criticism constructively if it is justified, and with a shrug if it is misguided, is seen as an expression of self-confidence and authenticity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMzLCJyevCk As everyone has noticed, this is not the case among Muslims. Here criticism, no matter how true, is seen as an attack on one’s honor, and it is expected that the honor is restored by using whatever means necessary to silence the opponent. Muslims almost never attempt to counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger. The third psychological factor concerns responsibility for oneself, and here the psychological phenomenon “locus of control” plays a major role. People raised by Western standards generally have an inner locus of control, meaning that they experience their lives as governed by inner factors, such as one’s own choices, world view, ways of handling emotions and situations, etc. Muslims are raised to experience their lives as being controlled from the outside. Everything happens “insha’ Allah” — if Allah wills — and the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little room for individual responsibility. This is the cause for the embarrassing and world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be punished for the Muslims’ own self-created situation. Finally, the fourth psychological factor making Muslims vulnerable to the violent message in the Quran concerns tolerance. While Western societies in general define a good person as being open and tolerant, Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims. The many hateful and dehumanizing verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy. Killing another person is easier if you hate him and do not perceive him as fully human.

Why Islam Creates Monsters

The cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran’s almost countless verses promoting hate and violence against non-Muslims, is the reason why Islam creates monsters.

The Psychological Problem within Islam

The problem with Islam and Muslim culture is that there are so many psychological factors pushing its followers towards a violent attitude against non-Muslims that a general violent clash is — at least from a psychological perspective — inevitable. With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a large group of people — all pitched against us — we are facing the perfect storm, and I see no possibilities of turning it around. For people to change, they have to want it, to be allowed to change, and to be able to change — and only a tiny minority of Muslims have such lucky conditions. Far too many people underestimate the power of psychology embedded in religion and culture. As we have already seen, no army of social workers, generous welfare states, sweet-talking politicians, politically correct journalists or democracy-promoting soldiers can stop these enormous forces. Sensible laws on immigration and Islamization in our own countries can limit the amount of suffering, but based on my education and professional experience as a psychologist for Muslims, I estimate that we will not be able to deflect or avoid this many-sided, aggressive movement against our culture. I do believe that we, as a democratic and educated society can become focused and organized concerning the preservation of our values and constitutions, can win this ongoing conflict started by the often inbred followers of Sharia. The big question is how much of our dignity, our civil rights, and our blood, money and tears will we lose in the process.

Please follow and like us:

89 thoughts on “"How Islam Creates Psychopaths," by Nicolai Sennels”

  1. Although I personally didn’t experience the vast majority of these so called “Islamic psychopathic innate deficiencies” in my own circle of Muslim family, friends, neighbors and colleagues in the Middle East and the US, I believe it’s valuable that Mr. Sennels highlighted these serious issues that I’m sure do exist in some Islamic communities so that Muslims, albeit I’m certain upset about his hateful generalizing tone and approach, can do something about these issues.
    To be fair though I do recall seeing, reading about and hearing of these same psychopathic problems in certain troubled non-Muslim communities in Africa, Central and South America and even in the US. The current carnage in Mexico related to the drug war there has countless examples of draconian slaughter and decapitation but I’m sure Sennels is not about to conclude that genetically all Hispanic Catholics are monstrous creatures. By the same token Serbain mass slaughter of Muslims, the German holocaust of Jews, the Hutu genocide of Tutsis so forth and so on all I’m sure will not lead Sennels to conclude that all, or even most, Russian Orthodox, German Lutherans and Hutu Protestants are insane murdered by nature.
    Indeed Quran has many verses that call for the killing of idol worshipers who tortoured and slaughtered the totally peaceful followers of Mohammad for 13 years in Makkah before Hijrah (immigration) to Medinah, but Quran also has numerous verses about being kind and fair with Jews and Christians to the point of allowing marriage with them, sharing food with them and permitting them to live peacefully with Muslims, albeit they had to pay taxes (who doesn’t 🙂 )
    At any rate if you come down to the Arabian Gulf area where I work now you’ll find that what Sennels is talking about is not factual nor justified. I strongly advice Mr. Sennels to spend a couple of months in Dubai (but not in July-August) and I’m sure he will tone down his anger about Islam and Muslims.

    1. Muslims are a tiny percentage of the Dutch population, yet they make up 70% of Dutch prisoners. What’s going on?
      I do believe that a lot of what he says here rings true, however, in many Islamic countries, the crime rate is vanishingly low. If Islam creates sociopaths everywhere it goes, these nations should be full of sociopaths. If they are full of sociopaths, why is there almost no crime?

      1. Bingo Robert. I’ve been privileged to become a close friend of many UAE National families who are really traditional Quranic Muslims and they even still wear their ethnic dresses (Dishdash or Kandourah) and I found them to be some of the most calm, tolerant, cool, polite and even intelligent people I’ve ever met in my life. Even other Muslims from all over the world who live in the UAE are pretty darn civilized, but I’m not sure how they behave in their own countries where they came from, I hope the same.

        1. I married into a Muslim family. Ialso lived with that family for 3 years in Amman Jordan, Jordan is relatively progressive compared to the UAE. All of my ex-pat friends were shocked how different my experience was than their own. All Arabs that I have met, despite their religion, wear a mask in public. They behave exactly like one another, the behave exactly as they are supposed to for fear of shame.
          If you think your knowing some people as a non-arab non-Muslim you are very mistaken. What I saw and heard in public compared to in the home/private was completely opposite.
          My husbands family are very kind loving and generous people. I can see the fundamentals of this in their beliefs and actions behind closed doors. If my husband doesn’t get his way or things get difficult he acts out in rage, he never takes responsibility in fact avoids doing anything difficult to avoid discomfort or failure.
          His position in the family often meant he was put in the position of disciplining people in the family. His anger and rage was feared in the family.
          The things I saw were confusing and socially unacceptable. Often he can’t even discern how his behavior is problematic because it is so accepted and revered.

      2. If Islam creates sociopaths everywhere it goes, these nations should be full of sociopaths. You confuse sociopathy with psychopathy. There are sociopaths in Islam, but there crimes are written up as rights…if your a male sociopath. Psychopaths are born not created, they are worsened by bad upbringings. Sociopaths are basically what the West likes to call hardened criminals and can be sociopathic psychopaths or sociopathic neurotypicals. Psychopathy is whole other kettle of fish, they are socially manipulative, controlling and deceitful. The suicide bomber is the mentally ill deranged metamagical thinking delusional mental health case, mild schizophrenia perhaps or naivete (faith) of tremendous proportion. The psychopath is the one telling him God wants him for a sunbeam and strapping the c4 to his back.

      3. Robert Lindsay,
        Maybe you will find the explanation in the Koran?
        Sura 48:29
        Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves. (…)

      4. That depends on what islamic countries considers a crime. Certainly not honour killings rape wife bashing peidiphilia female genital mutilation. which are all crimes in the west

    2. You’re just another Islam apologist playing the whole ‘Taqiyya’ BS. Oh, when will the West ever learn that it is quite alright for Muslims like ScienceMan (the irony!) to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. Its also been prescribed in the Qur’an. Even their prophet did it who clearly used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans. One horrendous Qur’anic example:
      When Muslim “missionaries” approached the tribe of Jadhima one of the members insisted that they would be slaughtered even though they had already “converted” to Islam to avoid just such a demise. However, the others were convinced that they could trust the Muslim leader’s promise that they would not be harmed if they simply offered no resistance.
      “After convincing the skeptic to lay down his arms, the unarmed men of the tribe were quickly tied up and beheaded.” – Ibn Ishaq 834 & 837
      This is just a very tiny fraction of what the “Religion of Peace” actually teaches.

    3. How can you read that and then identify with Mohammed? Its cultural I get it, it’s your people and I didn’t grow up being told God would want me dead if I stopped believing in fairy tales. But do you not feel that the doctrine itself was designed for a world such as the one we now have in Iraq? There is a fact that Mr Lindsey probably avoids, I haven’t read he whole thing yet.
      That the evidence is with the Qur’an as exhibit A. Muhammed himself was a psychopath.
      You can almost see his “spiritual” advisors trying to tone him down a bit.
      Muhammed: They should all have ten wives!
      Advisor: Er there’s a bit of a problem with the maths there sir…
      Muhammed : What?? what about all those converts from when we sacked that town…
      Advisor: I’ve counted em boss and there’s four each together with the last two raids.
      Muhammed: Tell them they get 72 when they get to paradise that will keep em happy.

    4. The tax you are implying is one of subjugation and submission and only to the benfit of the Muslim scum to further their stupid political theocracy. The Muslim doesnt have to pay this tax. And yes intermary , you mean how only smelly muslim men can marry any women and children by default become Muslim. But a Christian or jewish man cannot mary a filthy Muslim woman unless they convert to pisslam. I can go on about your lying evil religion.

      1. Love the name. In fact let us drink to your name with some bacon infused vodka. Drink it five times a day.
        Phuckyou drinks bacon infused vodka five times a day. May Allah bless you in your endeavours! Only Joking! But in any case…..
        My fave chinese name is Hoo Flung Dung.
        You are right about the tax. It is called Jizya. According to the Koran it is too be paid by humiliating the non Mohammadans or Kuffar.
        On the marriage laws you are correct. However, in Singapore, I believe if any woman marries a muslim man and converts the state gets involved as in they are unhappy with this marriage. So things are pushed in the opposite direction in Singapore.
        Trust Singapore to lead the way.

        1. In fact in Singapore there are two two laws. One is the Registry of Muslim Marriages. ROMM. THEN for the Buddhists, Hindus, Christians etc there is the Registry of Marriage. ROM.These latter people are allowed to intermarry as they wish. The state is not concerned.
          However, should a non muslim woman wish to marry a muslim the state is very involved. They frown on it but will allow it after it has been ascertained that the woman freely converted and that she knows what she is getting into. This can take a very long time. Once the waiting period and interviews are done only then can the marriage go ahead. I believe the period of waiting is about six months.
          I hope someone from Singapore can come to the blog and further elucidate the marriage laws of Singapore.

    5. HE is psychologist from Denmark who works in the prison system. The majority of his work is with muslim criminals.
      He is from Denmark. The original home of the cartoon jihad.
      Remember the original cartoon jihad when hundreds died worldwide and embassies were attacked, Danish flags burnt, and a boycott on Danish goods took place. I am sure a person of Danish descent like this gentlemen is not going to change his mind by visiting DUBAI.
      As a living he works with hardened islamic criminals in Denmark. And so He has seen enough to convince him of the true nature of Islam

    6. Again no references from the Koran as to where these verses of milk and kindness are with reference to Jews and Christians. It makes you wonder right?

  2. I’ve just done some research on crime statistics in Denmark from a US State Department report and other sources and concluded the following:
    1- Indeed a large percentage of crime in Denmark involves people from Islamic countries origin.
    2- Most of this “Islamic” background crime in Denmark is about the Somali community whereby 40% of that community is charged with one crime or another.
    2- The types of this so called “Islam-Related” crime in Denmark are mainly: prostitution, street gangs; murder, robberies; rape; extortation; drugs and alcohol black market; Al-Qaeda related terrorism, etc.
    3- Muslims in Denmark are at the lowest economic and social standards in Europe.
    4- Muslims in Denmark are targeted by neo-Nazi groups connected to the Norwegian neo-Nazi group of Anders Behring Breivik who massacred 77 people and injured 319 based on the belief that foreigners especially Muslims are criminals who are contaminating the purity of Scandinavian and European peace.
    First of all everything that these criminals if “Islamic origin” are committing is a forbidden massive sin in Islamic Shari’ah. Second, this seems to be an “African” problem not an “Islamic” problem per say. Third, there seems to be an essential economic issue here evident by the fact that Denmark has recently offered all people from a foreign origin who are struggling economically in Denmark $18,000 if they leave the country.
    There’s no doubt that most Islamic countries worldwide are economically inferior, unlike the very few wealthy Arabian Gulf oil countries, with significant political turbulence like Somalia. Thus by definition dictates the generation of many desparate people who would resort to crime but this has nothing to do with Islam and Quran who vehemently forbid murder, prostitution, drugs, alcohol, theft, rape, extortion, etc. which are the main crime problems in Denmark.
    I would even argue that had these so called “Muslims” in Denmark been properly educated under true Islamic education (not Al-Qaeda education) they would never commit these crimes.
    In the US for example and aside from the Al-Qaeda thugs, the American devout Muslim community enjoys the lowest rates of crime or social problems compared to other US communities like Afro-American, Italian or Hispanic.

    1. If these Somalis are devout then they shouldn’t commit these crimes no matter where they are. Killing non-Muslims or to die for Islam, according to the Quran, absolves you of all past sins. Read your Quran please.

    2. Germany and Scandinavia have had problems since the 1970’s when the Turks began replacing Southern Europeans as the menial labor force.
      Unlike Greeks or Spanish, the Turks would not return home. They were mostly Kurds.
      They tended to present the problems of Latinos-street gangs, early pregnancy, ghettos.
      Pakistanis came next, brought the heroin trade in and were more militantly violent. They fought with the bikers.
      Somalis lack the organizational skills of Pakistanis and are largely street loonies.
      Iranians have managed to assimilate easily into the white-collar work force.

  3. ScienceMan, you make some helpful comments. Muslims I know have good core values. Perhaps many of the problems are really political or socio-economic problems disguised as Muslim problems.

  4. Muslims with good core values, and I have known many myself, still want no freedom of religion and no equality of the sexes, and many think that if we westerners know it or not, we would all be better off living under Sharia. Northern Europe is especially under fire. 25% of Stockholm is now muslim, and as I have said here before 25% of Swedish women will be raped and 80% of the rapists will be Muslim immigrants. They bring their disregard and hatred of women and democracy with them from Africa and the middle east. Their economic deprivation is sometimes partially to blame, but the 19 hijackers who killed 3000 people on 9/11 were all middle class educated men, not the suffering lower class. Islam is a religion of death and destruction and punishment in its purest, most pious form. As the other monotheisms once did… It breeds madmen.

  5. If rape is an Islamic phenomenon Enkidu why are then most Islamic countries like Malaysia, Arabian Gulf, Indonesia, North Africa etc have the lowest rates of rape and crimes in general worldwide?
    Indeed Islamic Shari’ah in incompatible with current Western and other non-Islamic cultures, but that doen’t mean it’s evil just because it doesn’t live up to Western lifestyles. Aside from known and isolated fanatical practices in Saudi Arabia like not allowing women to drive and so forth, the vast majority of Muslim women enjoy much more decent lives, dignity, social security and family care than any Western society.
    The only mass death, destruction and punishment that we can talk about when it comes to Islam in the last 100 years is what Muslims have been subjected to by colonialism, then by non-Muslim invaders, then by secular despotic regimes who hate Shari’ah and by isolated terrorist groups like Saddam, Assad, Milosevic, Netanyahu, UBL, etc.

    1. Bah, Indonesians and Malaysians are terribly homophobic, and some Malays in Thailaind are terribly violent, because they don’t want to submit to Thais, they accept submission to Chinese in Malaysia because they are much more powerful tan them, likewise you see seeds of the true nature of muslims in Mindanao, Bali or Aceh. People who think that muslims SouthEast Asians are ok, don’t know enough

        1. Many thanks young man for the kind words. I wonder if Muslims you deal with know how much you hate them?

        2. That is interesting, i live (unfortunately) in Mexico (temporarely) ,never seen a Muslim on my life, however my aunt lives in Texas, a much more diverse place, and she has to deal with a Muslim asshole, he is an immigrant from Suriname, but an ethnic Indian, he is quite successful with money, she Works for him, but he is about 50 years old, workaholic, divorced and single, with bad temperament, last week my aunt called to us in the telephone crying because she think the man don’t treat her well at all, she says is like that with most people, she don’t want to work for him anymore

    2. It well known that rape is a hugely under-reported crime. In many Islamic country the victims face harassment and even jail for reporting rape.
      Stats might not be reliable. It might be that the extreme reclusive conditions women live in many Muslim countries limits social contacts so much it actually succeed in reducing rape. However I’m convinced that 1) the vast majority of women, Muslim or not, feel safer in a western country than in an Islamic country 2) many Muslims women prefer living in the west (and no western woman in her right mind would move to an Islamic one).
      I base my admittedly anecdotal conclusion on: 1) mass immigration trends from a large number of failing Islamic countries (no immigrants from Ukraine, for example) 2) ubiquitous statistics on rape or harassment similar to those reported above.

  6. Also Enkidu where do you believe can a woman walk alone at 2:00 AM feeling completely safe: downtown Abu Dhabi, Doha, KL? or downtown Detroit, Saint Louise, LA, Paris, London, Moscow, Bombay?
    Perhaps the 0.001 % criminal element in the Islamic world all immigrated to Europe where crime thrives and that’s why there’s rape is rare in the Islamic world.
    We all know about gang rapes in India committed by Yadav caste Hindus, are you Enkidu going to condemn Hinduism as a religion of rape, death, destruction and punishment? How about the Serb rape camps in Bosina where 60,000 Muslim women were gathered in rape camps and raped systematically in an organized and administrated fashion, are you Enkidu going to label Russian Orthodox religion as a religion of rape, death, destruction and punishment. Of course you’re not because you don’t hate Hindus, Serbs or Orthodox, you just hate Islam and Muslims.

    1. You don’t know that rape is rare in the Islamic world. You only know that reports and conviction rates are low. It wouldn’t be surprising if women did not report rapes in a situation where they felt a) nothing would be done about it b) it would damage their honour or reputation, c) they might even be blamed.
      Might it even be possible that Muslims are more willing to rape non-Muslim women in the west who they see as morally lose or they may see raping Muslim women as a greater offence? The rape rates of Muslims in the Scandinavian countries is alarming, from the reports I’ve read.
      I can’t give you rape is rare in Islamic countries but I do believe that homicide rates are low and equivalent to European levels, which is impressive enough.

      1. *loose.
        note: Im not saying rape rates are not low in Islamic countries- they may be but I don’t think we can know that with a high degree of confidence from the stats. Even if rates are low, it begs the question why they are not low in the west.

  7. “With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a large group of people — all pitched against us”.
    While I am not the biggest fan of Islam, I think this is a huge exaggeration. Its just not reality that all or most of the Muslim immigrants are against their hosts. Large numbers are moderate and even patriotic towards the country they were raised in. A lot of them are friendly towards non-Muslims.
    Personally, I’ve mostly had good experiences with Muslims. I lived in Manchester where there are quite a lot of Muslims and I found the ones I interacted with to be mostly friendly and warm.
    My main concern is just the possibility of terrorism or conflict if their numbers become large enough.
    Some of the stuff he’s saying may ring true but some of it seems quite weak.
    I wouldn’t say they were ‘playful’ in their approach to killing.

  8. From the UN UNODC 2014 site using countries where data was available and reliable, the top global highest non-war related rape rate locations worldwide are in order: Grenada, Sweden, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Chile, Trinidad, Canada, Uruguay, New Zealand, United States, Belgium, Zimbabwe, UK…., all non-Islamic.
    On the other hand from the same site the countries with the lowest non-war related rape rate in the world where data was available and reliable: Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, UAE, Palestine, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Algeria, Slovakia, Indonesia, Albania…. of which over 70% are Muslim countries. I would even suggest that in those other Muslim countries where statistics were not available like Saudi, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Jordan, Egypt etc rape rates are also very low.
    My point is that rape and violence against women is against Islamic teachings and those cases committed by so called “Muslims” in Sweden or Denmark are committed by criminals who do not adhere to true Islam.
    I am a devout Muslim Arab-American who’s truly very knowledgeable in Islamic Shari’ah so if my religion encourages rape and violence agonist women how come I consider my wife and all women in my family the most sacred and precious people in my life, and why do I abhor rape and consider it one of the most horrible and evil acts ever known to humanity? All Muslims I know and obviously there are countless have my same position.

    1. I have to agree with Steve here. Crime statistics are totally unreliable and comes with the assumption that there isnt other factors that alter the data from what is really happening. A women is not going to report a crime, if there is a chance that it could negatively effect her life.
      The murder rate in a country might be recorded as low, but failing to notice that thousands of people are being stoned to death by their families and neighbors for reasons far undeserving of death (considered murder in the west, but acceptable in some Muslim countrie). Those deaths are instead recorded as “executions”.

  9. Depends what type of Muslim. For example Malaysians and Iranians are probably some of the nicest and most calm people I have met from the Muslim world. Pakistanis and some Indian Muslims were quite intelligent and kind, but were often plagued with loner mentality (some of the girls wouldn’t hang out after school or weren’t allowed to). The Turks, Afghans, Moroccans, Algerians and those from the Horn or Central Asia were some of the most violent and hyper aggressive people I’ve seen.

    1. I lived with a Turkish guy. He just seemed like a normal western guy really. He wasn’t religious and it sounded like Turkey was pretty moderate, at that time anyway.

    2. Also those countries you listed in the bad category are so different, numerous and far apart. How did you manage to come to that conclusion? How many people from those places have you actually known?

  10. For every violent act in the Koran you can find 3 in the Bibble.
    In the Bibble, Eve is the backslider in the garden of Eden and Adam narcs her out to God. In the Koran, both are equally guilty of screwing up. And Eve isn’t made from Adams baby back rib
    In India there’s more rapes, and more “honor” killings among Hindu’s than in Muslim countries by a factor of ten. Even in Christian countries the rate of honor killings is sky high, comparably.
    “There is no compulsion in religion”. Big Moe
    Whenever I read this kind of pejorative propaganda about Muslims, I immediately suspect Zionists. It’s a sport with them. And you have a hard time ID’ing them because they change their names from Goldstein to Miller or Lipschitz to some goy-sounding name.
    Beware of this kind of shoot-from-the-hip demonizing of a religion.
    You won’t find a Muslim spitting on a priest in Jerusalem.

    1. The bible is a whole lot bigger! AL KORAN is a tiny repetitive book.
      The violence in the Koran is prescriptive.
      The vast majority of the Koran is prescriptive violence directed against unbelievers.
      The main topic of the Koran is the infidel or the Kuffar. THIS is the main reason for its existence.
      Clear, unambiguous Allah sanctioned violence against the unbelievers.
      The prescriptive nature of this violence is clear and not in need of interpretation as the Koran makes clear that it is opposed to interpretation. Over and over again it claims to be a VERY CLEAR book.
      In order to keep this short I have not quoted chapter and verse. Also since I am under moderation I am not really sure what I need to do in order to get a post through. I just keep trying! How about letting this post through Robert?!

      1. Hi SF. The problem is sort of that you have been banned multiple times. Yes you have also been reinstated repeatedly.
        The main problem at the moment is:
        Continuation of absurd, humorous posts that don’t really say anything productive about anything. This blog is called Beyond Highbrow not Beyond Dada. Your comments have to have some sort of substance to them. You cannot be posting frivolous nonsense all the time.
        Constant bashing of Islam and Arabs. It is obvious that you have an extreme hatred of both of these groups. After all, you are an Indian nationalist. But you are not really a progressive person. You are a bit of a reactionary. Why clearly Islam is a dubious religion to say the least, I do not want to bash it too much because all of the Islam-bashers are reactionaries! Why get down and roll around in the mud with my enemies? Forget it! So you defend one reactionary culture and religion (Hinduism) while bashing another reactionary culture and religion (Arab culture and Islam). I am not real keen on that.
        Sure you can bash Islam on here. I am not so wild about the religion myself! And we do have some Islam-bashers on here from time to time. Nevertheless, they usually leave because they are all rightwingers and this is clearly not a rightwing blog. A lot of rightwingers post here and a bit and then do a quick sniff test on the blog and decide it smells too stinky and Lefty for them and they just feel uncomfortable posting here, so they leave. Which is the general idea anyway.
        You are a very, very smart guy, and you actually have a very interesting mind and even soul when you get away from your obsession with filthy lucre. You know history very well. You know philosophy. You show evidence of wisdom. These are all things we prize in Beyond Highbrow commenters.
        So really I want you to get off this Islam and Arab-bashing thing. Every post you make bashes Islam and Arabs and I am getting really tired of it. As I said, you are an interesting and at times even decent fellow and I would like to see you posting on something other than endless Arab and Islam-bashing. Yes you can continue to bash them, but please not every post. I would like you to focus on some other topics and show us some of that interesting mind and soul of yours!

        1. Thanks RL, that gives me my bearings.
          OK I will quit being a prophet with a new Revelation from Allah. No more re writing the Koran and also no crazy stories about underwater Negrologists in search of Blacklantis!
          Though I am tempted to tell you about a robot friend I purchased who stopped being a friend and refused to go back to the store for a refund. No I will not tell up you that story (and even telling you that much is a kind of backsliding); henceforth I will strictly resist temptation!

  11. Now missing it comment on sociopaths in Jewish communities. Muslims= many average sociopaths
    Gypsies = most low-functioning sociopaths
    Jews = many are high-functioning sociopaths

  12. All of Israel’s actions against the Palestinians feed into the psychological system described in the article.

  13. QUOTE”Brainwashing people into believing or doing things against their own human nature — such as hating or even killing innocents they do not even know ”
    White (Asian etc..) Nationalists do the same thing.

    1. You could even argue regular Americans do the same, in their patriotic fervor. Sports can also turn people about anywhere into monsters.

      1. In many places, the Olympics and World Cup are equivalent to going to war. They use these games to show national glory, and to get back at other countries (old colonial rulers etc..)

  14. I guess this one single line straight from the Qur’an tells you all about Islam and its “peaceful” followers.
    “Mohammed is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are harsh to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.” [Quran, 48:29]
    (*unbelievers – everyone else)

    1. Christians are not taught to kill unbelievers. However, very strict ones are commanded by scripture to avoid unbelievers, and weak Christians. They are to witness to them, only.

      1. This is what primarily differentiates Islam from the rest. They are inherently violent and are taught to be violent. Another example:
        Narrated by Ibn ‘Umar:
        Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”
        See what I meant, its perfectly alright for them to kill you if you’re not willing to surrender yourself to their cult.

        1. Buddhism and Christianity are not inherently violent. However, religion doesn’t motivate hatred in a lot of places, nationalism does. Of course, in the middle ages, religion mixed with the state, caused a lot of violence in Europe.

        2. Take Chinese, for example, they aren’t that religious, but incredibly nationalistic, as are most northeast Asians. That is their religion.

        3. QUOTE”Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”
          See what I meant, its perfectly alright for them to kill you if you’re not willing to surrender yourself to their cult.”
          Catholics did the same in Latin America. Maybe it wasn’t at gunpoint, but once you colonize and rule their land, then it’s far easier to convert. Of course, this isn’t always the case, as with the Irish and Poles.

        4. Samuel 15:3
          ” Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’”

  15. Looks like Dave 6234 is actually a crypto-Zionist, up to his Hasbara shenanigans.
    A favorite tactic of the Zionists is to change the interpretation of a Qu’ranic verse, simple and effective, s long as no one checks.
    “, 48:29 (Asad) MUHAMMAD is God’s Apostle; and those who are [truly] with him are firm and unyielding [This composite gives, I believe, the full meaning of the term ashidda (sing. shadid) in the above context.] towards all deniers of the truth, [yet] full of mercy towards one another.
    [Lit., “among themselves”. Cf. 5:54 – “humble towards the believers, proud towards all who deny the truth”.]
    Changes the entire meaning huh? Of course.
    And dave’s other contribution…
    “Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”
    Did u think this was from the Koran? It’s not.
    This is from the hadiths, stories memorized by Arabs, and often changed from the originals and even made up.
    The “people” referred to in this were the groups who were making war on the Arabs in the 7th century.
    Here’s what the Koran says…
    “And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, except with means better (than mere disputation), unless it be with those of them who inflict wrong (and injury): but say, “We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our God and your God is one; and it is to Him we bow (in Islam).” S. 29:46
    Those who believe (in the Qur’an), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Sabians and the Christians, – any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, – on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. S. 5:69, cf. 2:62
    “There is nom compulsion in religion.” Mohammed
    “Respect other religions” Mohammed

    1. Bull! Another one of your games. You love to play them don’t you.
      “Muslims respecting other religions,” ROTFL!!!
      On September 25, 2002, a group of armed Islamists in Karachi, Pakistan entered the office of a Christian charity, tied seven workers to chairs and then brutally murdered them. According to Muslim witnesses, the Muslims “showed no haste. They took a good 15 minutes in segregating the Christians and making sure that each one of their targets received the most horrific death.”
      The holiest book of Islam (61% of which is about non-Muslims) draws the sharpest of distinctions between Muslims (the best of people, 3:110) and non-believers (the worst of creatures, 98:6). Praise is lavished on the former while the latter is condemned with scorching generalization. Far from teaching universal love, the Qur’an incessantly preaches the inferiority of non-Muslims, even comparing them to vile animals and gloating over Allah’s hatred of them and his dark plans for their eternal torture. Naturally, the harsh treatment of non-believers by Muslims is encouraged as well.
      The Qur’an makes it clear that Islam is not about universal brotherhood, but about the brotherhood of believers:
      “The Believers are but a single Brotherhood.” (49:10)
      “Are those who know equal to those who know not?” (39:09)
      “Is the blind equal to the one who sees, or darkness equal to light?” (13:16)
      “A believing slave is superior to a free Mushrik.” (2:221)
      The Qur’an plainly tells Muslims that they are a favored race, while those of other religions are “perverted transgressors:”
      “Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book [Christians and Jews] had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors.” (3:110)
      The Ayatollah Khomeini, who dedicated his entire life to studying Islam, said that non-Muslims rank somewhere between “feces” and the “sweat of a camel that has consumed impure food.” Small wonder…
      The Qur’an dehumanizes non-Muslims, describing them as “animals” and beasts:
      “Those who disbelieve from among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures.” (98:6)
      “Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve, then they would not believe.” (8:55)
      Such “sweet” & “gentle” words!
      Verse 7:176 compares unbelievers to “panting dogs” with regard to their idiocy and worthlessness.
      Verse 7:179 says they are like “cattle” only worse.
      Verse 5:60 even says that Allah transformed Jews of the past into apes and pigs. This is echoed by verses 7:166 and 2:65
      A hadith (Bukhari 54:524) says that Muhammad believed rats to be “mutated Jews” (also confirmed by Sahih Muslim 7135 and 7136)
      Verses 46:29-35 even say that unbelieving men are worse than the demons who believe in Muhammad.
      According to Islamic law, non-Muslims may be owned as property by Muslims, but – in keeping with Islam’s supremacist message – a fellow Muslim should never be (unless they convert to Islam under enslavement).
      Even Christians and Jews are not considered fully human in that the penalty for killing one of them is limited to one-third of the compensation due for unintentionally killing a Muslim.

      1. Islam totally deserves to be wiped off the face of the earth. What the ISIS is doing in Iraq and Syria is no different from what the founder of Islam himself did.

        1. Christianity teaches that God loves all people, but hates sin. The Qur’an never says this. Instead it explicitly declares that Allah does not love those who do not believe in him:
          “He does not love the unbelievers.” (30:45)
          Allah only loves those who obey Muhammad (at least according to Muhammad, who provided the “narration”):
          Say: “Obey Allah and His Messenger:” But if they turn back, Allah loveth not those who reject Faith. (3:32)
          Instead of a god that loves the sinner, even while hating the sin, the wrath of Allah is placed squarely on the individual:
          “Surely Allah does not love any one who is unfaithful, ungrateful.” (22:38)
          Verses 11:118-199 say that Allah does not bestow mercy on everyone. For this reason, he chooses not to guide some people:
          “And Allah’s is the direction of the way, and some (roads) go not straight. And had He willed He would have led you all aright.” (16:9)
          For those whom Allah does not love, there will be the most terrible of eternal torments, including eternal roasting!!
          “Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.” (4:56)
          “Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers.” (2:98). He hates them so much that he even leads them into sinning and actively prevents them from believing in him, thus ensuring their fate.
          Although nowhere does the Quran say that Allah loves those who don’t believe Muhammad, there are over 400 verses that describe the torment that he has prepared for people of other religions (or no religion):
          “And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers.” (3:85)
          The relative worth of non-Muslims is that they are but fuel for the fire of Hell:
          “(As for) those who disbelieve, surely neither their wealth nor their children shall avail them in the least against Allah, and these it is who are the fuel of the fire.” (3:10 Shakir: “firewood of hell”)
          “But as for those who disbelieve, garments of fire will be cut out for them; boiling fluid will be poured down on their heads, Whereby that which is in their bellies, and their skins too, will be melted; And for them are hooked rods of iron Whenever, in their anguish, they would go forth from thence they are driven back therein and (it is said unto them): Taste the doom of burning.” (22:19-22)
          Such perverse are the ways of Islam!! SHIT!!
          No one could torture a person in this way without hating them intensely. Neither can Allah’s intense loathing for unbelievers help but affect the Muslim attitude toward those outside the faith.
          The personal superiority of Muslims is confirmed by the contrasting picture painted in so many places in the Qur’an in which they are rewarded with the greatest of earthly comforts in heaven, while the unbelievers concurrently suffer horrible torment.

      2. Yeah yeah..I showed where you lied dude. You lied. You cn post 387 fasle quotes from the Koran and the hadiths, but once I demonstrate your dishonesty with the first 2 u posted, all the rest are Caca. All caca.
        Everything you’ve written is pure Hasbara, Zionist, non-kosher anti-Arab agitprop.
        You are full of kafir caca, Davey boy. Can I play Frisbee with your yarmulke?

    2. What a deceit
      quoting verses out of historical, theological, and text context in order to blatantly lie to people. The much more qualified caliph of the Islamic state! with a phd in Islamic studies says the exact opposite
      of this
      Dano the lying Islamo.
      Notice this DANO the LYING ISLAMO does NOT give the reference for Respect all religions. It is no where in the KORAN! it is made up.
      Notice for no the compulsion verse again there is no reference also.
      However, this verse does exist but in a very important CONTEXT.
      SO we need also
      The verses before and after
      The historical reference
      The theological reference with regards to a doctrine known as the doctrine of abrogation found in islamic theology.
      And who it is addressed to.
      None of this is supplied. So diligent reader if you care for the truth I urge you to study the issue further by researching in depth at your own initiative and then make your mind up BUT make sure you understand the verse in its proper multidimensional CONTEXT.

    3. OK let us demonstrate the falseness of what DANO the LYING ISLAMO has said with just the quotation of the following verse to the “no compulsion” and this following verse states that unbelievers will go to hell.
      Koran 2:256
      There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is distinct from error, And he who reject false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will ever break. Allah is the hearer and knower.
      Koran 2:257
      Allah is the protecting Guardian of those who believe. He bringeth them out of darkness into the light. AS FOR THOSE WHO DISBELIEVE their patrons are FALSE DEITIES. They bring them out of light into darkness.SUCH ARE RIGHTFUL OWNERS OF THE FIRE. THEY WILL ABIDE THEREIN.
      So we see when read in this textual context that what Allah means is that any who do not believe will be thrown into hell forever. This is Allah’s idea of no compulsion. It is hell fire forever.
      The proceeding verses also prepare one for this conclusion but then if we delve there this post gets too long. Also we need to look at the historical context and the theological and philosophical context which all point to the same idea that not believing in Allah is the very worst thing you can do.
      Indeed on a practical level this supported in countries which support sharia law by the execution of anyone who leaves Islam. The sharia penalty for leaving islam is death.
      So the practical application of the Koran point to the verse of punishment after this life and hence validates punishment in this life according to sharia law. So now we have looked at this verse in its legal sharia law context as well. This is getting long, so diligent reader research further by yourself and listen no more to DANO the LYING ISLAMO.

    4. What lies you speak.Actually Dani there are so many errors in you post but let us deal with a blatant lie. No where in the Koran, Sirat al rasool, tabari,Hadith literature of the sahi variety does Mohammad say: “respect other religions”.
      I am sure you will not give a reference as this is something you made up and hence the reason you do not give a reference. Why do lie?

  16. No one could torture a person in this way without hating them intensely. Neither can Allah’s intense loathing for unbelievers help but affect the Muslim attitude toward those outside the faith.
    Mohammad, who was a shameless plagiarist borrowing freely from both christians and jews, got the idea of eternal torture for non-believers in hell from christian dogma. If you are morally and intellectually repulsed by the concept of eternal hellish torture then why the fuck are still a christian???

  17. I don’t want to pick on Islam, cause people are the same everywhere. Religion and/or nationalism has brought out the worst in everyone. For instance, in the US media, you hear about the horrors of Islam, but when was the last time you heard about the “untouchables (dalits)”. The treatment of them is so bad, a Jihad in India would be liberating, considering the circumstances.

    1. I wonder Jason Y why you want to ignore what Muslims say?
      Is that a not arrogant? Do not Muslims who gleefully chop peoples heads off while quoting the Koran have agency backed up by reason.
      But of course you know best because you do. You are not a practising muslim. You have not read the Koran in its historical,theological,litery context and yet you just make an unsubstantiated claim with no evidence and dismiss everything Muslims, the Koran, The SIRAT Al RASOOL have to say.
      You blanket claim is that religion and nationalism have brought out the worst In Everyone and you leave at that.
      Where is there any evidence for this? If anything religion and nationalism in different contexts brings forth different fruit.
      Biut you are a muddled thinker. Everyting is the same to you. Very different things such as the cifferent religions are just Religion.Differerent types of a nationionalism are just Nationalism.
      But wait it gets worse. You conflate Them into one!
      Let us unravel things. Let us look at one particular unique religion known as Islam. Let us read and listen and try to learn.
      What you need to do is a talk with the the Caliph of the Islamic state who has a BA, MA, and PHD in Islamic studies.
      Or at least aquaint yourself with the literature concerned and stop arrogantly dismissing what Muslims have to say about their ownselves when they commit acts of beheading while quoting from the Koran.
      Until you can at least bring some understanding of others as regards their agency from what they say and believe, you remain in your own dismissive arrogant thought bubble.

  18. In 2007 Islam and Judaism’s holiest holidays overlapped for 10 days. Muslims racked up 397 dead bodies in 94 terror attacks across 10 countries during this time… while the Jews (non-believers) worked on their 159th Nobel Prize!
    According to the Quran, non-believers…
    Eat like beasts 47:12
    Are apes 7:166, 5:60, 2:65
    Are swines 5:60
    Are asses 74:50
    The vilest of animals in Allah’s sight 8:55
    Losers 2:27, 2:121, 3:85
    Have a disease in their hearts 2:10, 5:52, 24:50
    Are hard-hearted 39:22, 57:16
    Impure of hearts 5:41
    Are deaf 2:171, 6:25
    Are blind 2:171, 6:25
    Are dumb 2:171, 6:35, 11:29
    Are niggardly 4:37, 70:21
    Works shall be rendered ineffective 2:217, 47:1, 47:8
    Are impure 8:37
    Are scum 13:17
    Are inordinate 5:68, 78:22
    Are transgressors 2:26, 9:8, 46:20
    Are unjust 29:49
    Make mischief 16:88
    Are the worst of men 98:6
    Are in a state of confusion 50:5
    Oh the irony!! Cheers!!!

    1. WE have the Ramadan bombathon every year. It is coming up.Things are going get really bad this year.
      So yes it happened not only in 2007 but every year since. It is a annual rite of madness called the Ramadan bombathon. I believe 2015 may be the year of the greatest carnage yet.

  19. I am not sure what you do to Muslims in Denmark, but this certainly does not describe the Muslims I have met in the Sydney, Australia area, and there are many.
    ‘in spite of Islam’s inhumane nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other religious group.’
    Again, far from my experience.
    ‘always looking for new and more effective ways of killing and terrorizing people — is astonishing: hijacking jumbo jets and flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one’s own body, using model airplanes as drones,’
    As opposed to the US Or Israel for example?
    ‘Muslims almost never attempt to counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger’.
    ‘Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims.’
    I could not better describe Israel, than by using these last two paragraphs!
    I suggest that you broaden your experience of Muslims, get out and interact with their communities, rather than judge them by those few with whom you deal in prisons.

  20. Define offences. Most ‘written’ laws are exaggerations. If it’s pety crime, such as littering, I wouldn’t consider it a crime.

  21. More statistical based research using the Hare Psychopathic Checklist -R is needed to validate these ideas.
    Like the Inquistion psychopaths can be triggered and created by religions and psychopaths manipulation of them and the budding antisocial personalities in them.

    1. This checklist sounds very interesting!
      There are plenty of psychopaths but I would hazard a guess that Muslims tend not to be inclined that way. Most muslims I have met have been quite good at personal interaction, especially Pakistanis. I wondered what group of people produces the most psychos!
      Islam, however is not a race. It is an ideology akin to Communism with the beard of the prophet thrown for a quick fondle!
      Like Communism it aims to control all aspects of life including the religious aspect, which is very slight on deep spirituality and more keen on ideological do and don’ts; and so tends to the more secular control functions of Communism mixed in with the insanities of the founder and his ways thrown into the mix; such as marrying nine year old girls as per its sharia legal system as practised in Saudi, Islamic state, and Iran.

    2. I think since their so little spirituality in Islam and so it is essentially an atheist materialist ideology of state control.
      Why Atheist? Vengence is never mine for Allah. It is up to the believers. Allah is powerless. It is up to the believers to wage Jihad.
      The purpose of Jihad? To take over the world for Allah, who of course is incapable of this simple task. Again we are talking about an n atheist ideology. Indeed the poverty among Muslims show how incapable both the powerless Allah;and his believers are.
      The result? A deep neurotic desperation for material goods both here and in the imaginary heaven.
      A prescription for? Neurotic behaviour birthed by frustration in tackling the complexities of the material world. Not Pyscopathy.
      Psycopaths are a whole ‘nuther thing but officials of the Islamic state do refer to the most violent jihadis as Psycopaths. The local people also refer to them in this way. These people would be happy doing their work anyplace it is just that Islamic state is a good place for them at this juncture in history.

  22. Every religion has “deviants” among the practitioners. Having accepted that the recent terrorist activities are perpetrated by people who are Muslims and there is no denying this fact. It would be unfair to use the same brush to paint the entire Muslim population of the World.
    When in Northern Ireland, a few decades back, there were bombings in Protestant majority areas, no one called them Catholic terrorists. They were just “terrorists”, then.
    If we go back a little in the history, the genocides carried out by the Spanish and/or Portuguese in South America or in Goa, India are not called Catholic atrocities or even genocides. Most history books, in fact, gloss over these. To make it even more intriguing, these were carried out by followers of a religion whose prophet asked for forgiveness even for people who crucified him.
    So it is the collective mind set of a person or a group, small or large. of people who are responsible for unsocial activities. Let us be cautious in our response lest we encourage more to follow the wrong doers by “persecution mania”.

    1. You need to be qualified by studying the Koran
      The leader of the Islamic state is qualified. He is Caliph Al Bagdadi.
      He has a masters and a PHD in Islamic studies.
      So what he says has real weight.
      What you say well…
      This is your personal opinion. What matters is the opinion of the qualified leader of the Islamic State, and he know Islam.
      Islam is what Mohammad and his prophet say. This is in the Koran,and the hadiths, or the recorded examples of conduct set by the prophet. Additional information is found in The biography of the prophet.
      Unless you quote what the prophet says in the historical,
      and theological context you do not represent the truth of Islam. You speak from your own mental bubble. Islam is not a historical comparison, it is the words of Allah and his prophet.
      Read the Koran in context and then you will understand the truth of Islam.

  23. This chap looks to have been working with criminals in a Danish Prison and is a psychologist, not a member of one of the many disciplines that study human behaviour on a large scale. This is likely to result in a biased and skewed perspective of a subsection of an entire society and culture and unlikely to result in a properly balanced assessment……..no matter what culture is under the microscope. This is more likely to be simply a personal view of a subsection of the Danish criminal population. Islam has its issues and its ideology should be challenged. Assessing criminal behaviour and its numerous severe manifestations and outbreaks throughout history requires a little more insight than simply blaming a religion that approximately a quarter of the world’s population ascribes to.

    1. Just because a lot of people hold a view does not make it right. If a fifth of the world is islamic that means they are wrong by this “argument by number” Logic. That means the 80percent of the world which is non Islamic is right.
      Surely the 5.8 billion people who are non islamic must be correct.
      I am only applying your own logic.
      As for the qualifications of this gentleman he has more than you do. He is a qualified psychologist who works in a professional capacity in his chosen profession in the Danish Prison system. He has academic qualifications, published papers and years of experience in dealing with a variety of criminals both Islamic and non Islamic.
      Do you have this level of qualification?
      It appears that your comments are purely of your own invention. In other words this your personal opinion.
      Again I am just applying your own logic in order to assess you own level of qualification.
      Of the two of you this gentleman is certainly more qualified than you are, and so his opinion caries much more academic and professional weight.

  24. Thanks be to Lord of man kind, entirely i could said you miss investigate islam and muslim from where you suppose to, am a muslim and i knows that all what you said about islam it’s totally out of islam. From what i my self research and investigate and what i was taught in schools, islam have condemn all such mentioned act. Those you misstook as muslim i can’t said they not muslim But they are not obeying and following the real jurisdiction of islam, and what they are following is what such muslim sycophants of Zionist have invent in islam just to tarnish the image of islam and to insert Islamic phobia to the people.
    There for you need to back and research fully on islam. It’s a religion of peace, mercy, and harmony with every body provided you want that.

    1. Inshallah al lah will guide you to read the Koran. Start with chapter nine. It is an excellent chapter from al lah for the guidance of Muslims who do not read the Koran, but rely on otherrs. Read the Koran for youself. Star with chapter nine and find out where each chapte was composed, whether in medina or Mecca in order for you to have historical context.
      Also remember theological context. The hadiths and their interpretation by the scholars of Islam such ibn Abbas, the cousin of Mohammad will give theological context to the reading you do. Inshallah you will start your own research today.
      As for translations, stick to the translations put out by the ministry of religion of Saudi Arabia. Inshallah you will gain in knowledge every day.

  25. Arab Americans do not demonstrate the social pathology of NAMS or even Filipinos or Koreans. They simply produce, one out of perhaps one million, religious lunatics.
    There are no Arab-American gangs. They tend to be hard-working, law-abiding, non-violent people.
    …But one exception can cause a great deal of violence and terror.

  26. This piece was very well written and informative.
    Psychologists today are careful to distinguish between psychopathy and sociopathy, whereas in the past the two terms were nearly interchangeable. We know that psychopathy now is a strongly heritable trait ( 50 % ) and is largely genetic. Psychopaths are the truly dangerous ones, bereft of any true human empathy, possessing no conscience and treating all other people as physical objects for their own amusement and use. Psychopaths are frequently overtly malicious, possessed of superficial charm and lie with impugnity. Despite arguments by some that ‘some’ psychopaths in society might be ‘valuable’ to accomplish things, the general emerging consensus is that in fact they are just malevolent. They should probably be sterilised or otherwise prevented from breeding. Upwards of 25 % to 35 % of incarcerated criminals are psychopaths. Their crimes–including murder–are very largely planned, with approximately 93 % of physical violence and murder self-originated by the psychopath and not ‘provoked’ or ‘situational’. They have no moral centre and–literally–no sense of right nor wrong. They perceive these qualities to be the delusions of others and not applicable to them. They feel justified in everything they do. They commit the lion’s share of violent crimes and murders. No matter how much ‘treatment’ psychopaths might receive, they will never, ever get better: there is no cure for psychopathy and they will always remain a clear and present danger to civilised societies. Any ‘treatment’ or ‘corrections’ a psychopath receives only makes them more clever about their activities and to ‘hide’ better under a masque of sanity. They do not change. Because they learn to more more chameleon-like, this may only make them more dangerous to others.
    Contrast this with sociopathy and anti-social personality disorders. They, too, are responsible for much violent crime and murders, but the correlation with heritability seems lower and seems to be more of a factor of environmental factors–particularly those formed in early childhood and other formative development stages. Although they can behave maliciously ( and frequently do ), they do know the difference between right and wrong and treatment–particularly when applied early enough–can significantly modify their behaviour and afford them the opportunity to become more social and empathetic. These are the ‘criminals’ who may in fact reform. ( Ordinary, social people who commit crimes during the ‘heat of passion’ or because of momentary weakness or because of addiction may exhibit criminal traits; they also are quite able to reform. Long-term career criminals are frequently sociopaths. Sociopaths may appear to be psychopaths at first glance–and many are extremely dangerous as well–but they are just as likely to be as much a threat to themselves or to withdraw from society as they are to victimise others.
    Sociopathic behaviours and traits are frequently ‘channeled’ by Muslims to be directed outwards towards non-Muslims, ‘undeserving’ Muslims and each other and are ‘rewarded’ in various ways, as Dr. Sennels asserts. Inbreeding has also depressed Muslim general intelligence to dangerously low levels. Both of these mean they are much more likely to exhibit criminal behaviour, violence and other anti-social traits overtly–which means they are much more likely to be incarcerated. The 70 % statistic he cites should therefore not be so shocking. Because of the inbreeding and the traits favoured under such a regime, I would also be interested in finding out what the percentage of actual psychopathy is within various Muslim populations in the West and in dar-al-Islam, as well. I would guess it would be much higher than the 1 % – 2 % found in Western and Eastern societies, and higher than the 3 % – 5 % found amongst CEOs, Financial king-pins and Athletes. Unfortunately, I know of no study that has focused on discovering this ( maybe because of politically-correct taboos ? ).
    Clearly, there is something wrong with Muslims generally, Islam fundamentally and the New Left ideologically. What exact roles that sociopathy and psychopathy play in this ‘game’ might be very, very revealing–and thus serve as a better entrance point to handle it more effectively and limit damage to our nations, our culture…and to civilisation itself.

  27. Really if you search about Islam the road take you to islam is peace who is terrorist millions of people were killed by Christians in USA .India.australia.afghanistan.libya.syria.iraq.at colony time in Africa.and so on there is no Muslims country who take war to another country .Only some who have mind problems commit the crime .We know today in Wich country is most range of rape .Corruption.gays.bitch.disease like HIV .Robbers.gambeling.killing.kidnap.abbortion.all of this today spread in Christian country sorry for your loses.becouse your inside eye is exploded only you use ourt side eye .Your eye is only know about world but you are blind about here after .World without Islam is will destroyed in this world the true worshippers are only Muslims who believes in Almighty of God there is no god or creations accept Allah and Mohammed is his messenger sent to us to guide us .We not worship Mohammed we not worship Jesus Christ.moses Zacharia Abraham.all of them are we have great respect to them please read the Islamic scholars again

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)