Libfems Versus Radfems

Interview with Gail Dines, radfem, about her anti-porn book Pornland. The interview was written up on the site of the New Left Project, so apparently both libfems (such as the author, Sarah Ditum) and radfems like Dines are both part of the Left.
I do not think men should blanketly oppose feminism as much of the reactionary Manosphere wants us to. However, choosing to support libfems and to oppose radfems seems to be a rational thing to do. In opposing radfems, we avoid the trap saying, “We oppose feminism,” or a cryptic, “We oppose some feminism.” We lay out exactly which feminism we oppose (radfems) and which we support critically (libfems).
Radfems strike me as mentally ill people. As someone who works in mental health, I do not see why I should support a movement full of mentally disturbed people who seek to impose their mental illnesses on society.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

0 thoughts on “Libfems Versus Radfems”

  1. So they are beyond the range that you believe to be, “normal,” therefore their opinions are not credible, hence, sane and something lurking on the fringes of society?
    I remind you, that, this world contains nearly eight billion people and among those numbers stands, most probably, more in number that all the psychologists on earth combined. One might just as easily say that every person who pursues a degree in mental health fields, is themselves, “insane,” due to the fact that they are so few in number against the many who view them to be beyond the range of normative behavior.
    Mathematically it is you whop are insane not they and mathematics are the language of logical intelligence are they not?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.