Keystone XL Pipeline: The Truth

This is an excellent piece by a new guest writer on here, Juliette Zephyr, a young woman from Maryland who, believe it or not, is only 22 years old. I was very impressed with the writing in this piece.

Juliette Zephyr.
Juliette Zephyr. Born and raised north of Baltimore, Juliette works in tourism and is involved in environmental activism. She enjoys networking, reading, and performing concerts.

 
People really need to read up on this Keystone Pipeline. It’s a very, very bad idea.

Keystone XL Pipeline: The Truth

By Juliette Zephyr

The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline project is slated to transport oil sands straight down the middle of the country, all the way from Canada to Nebraska, where it will then connect to an existing leg of the pipeline that was already constructed. In its path is the Ogallala Aquifer, home to a variety of native species such as the sage grouse, as well as being one of the most important sources of drinking water in the U.S.
The pipeline will also cut across North Dakota’s Bakken Shale basin, where crude oils will be extracted using a well-known and very dirty drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.” The EPA knows that fracking is a risky business for the surrounding communities in which it is implemented. EPA scientists have confirmed that the water in many areas where this is occurring is indeed contaminated with drilling chemicals, heavy metals, and stray oils, with alarming pictures appearing all over the internet depicting people’s well water catching on fire.
With massive expansion of fracking all over the country, especially in compromised areas where citizens rely on groundwater near drill sites, we have a national problem only made worse by policymakers motivated by corporate interests, attempting to hawk it as a so-called “boost” to our economy, and claiming that it won’t have any long-term negative implications for us environmentally.
The fact of the matter is that the majority of the oil transported by Keystone are eventually destined for export to other countries in Europe and South America. Furthermore, it is expected that just fifty permanent jobs will be created, and there’s currently no substantiated evidence that the pipeline will lower oil prices for American citizens.
Instead, current research paints a bleaker picture. Recent investigations uncovered that the leak detection systems in place for the pipeline are faulty – nineteen out of twenty spills are undetected. What’s further alarming is that spills involving tar sands oil are much more damaging to the environment than traditional crude oil.
They don’t biodegrade easily at all, and sink in the water. It is extremely difficult to undo the damage once an sand oil spill has happened, it and costs a lot to clean up. People can and already have been developing asthma and lung issues from the bad air quality in areas immediately surrounding the Keystone Pipeline. Methane is considered one of the primary concerns of the greenhouse gas emissions produced in these areas.
Keystone is clearly not in the public’s best interest, but let’s take a more in-depth look at the exact environmental impact it would have:
It will significantly add to carbon pollution, locking in high-carbon infrastructure for half a century. It is estimated to reach $128 billion in climate costs. The FSEIS found it could contribute $1.43 billion in accumulated incremental tons of greenhouse gas emissions to our atmosphere over the next fifty years. Considering that tar sands oil is much more carbon-intensive than conventional oil, these incremental emissions are equivalent to adding 5.7 million cars to the road for fifty years.
The controversy of what this pipeline would entail highlights a larger problem: our dependency on fossil fuels. Instead of funding tests to pioneer cleaner energy sources, Big Oil chooses to put all their eggs in one basket, to the detriment of our ecosystems.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

8 thoughts on “Keystone XL Pipeline: The Truth”

  1. Bad idea or not, those Texas refineries are begging for that tar sand.
    Most of the Keystone pipeline is existing, the XL portion will give it as a crow flies route.
    http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/energy/great-energy-challenge/keystone-xl-pipeline-route-map/
    Bakken Frack product is already being extracted. Its what the runaway rail cars that blew up and killed many in Lac Megantic, Quebec, Canada were full of.
    The driver for oil dependency is the insatiable US demand for the product. Standing at arms length from big oil gives citizens the ability to point the finger, then get in their SUV’s and drive 100 MPH.
    Oil sand doesn’t need an Aircraft Carrier to extract like oil product from the middle east does. That’s the reason the XL will happen.
    On another note, I was in Huntington Beach CA a few weeks ago, real nice view of off shore rigs in the Surf City sunset too. Didn’t Obama call a moratorium on OSDR’s?

    1. Moratorium on new drilling.
      Keystone oil from the Alberta tar sand is already being exported as it is, is it not? Otherwise after they mine the stuff, what do they do with it?
      Who cares what some oil refinery wants? Heck with oil refineries.

      1. Oil sands are refined here and the product sold to – eyup the US. What isn’t refined is shipped in various levels of refinement. Costs to build new refineries at current Environmental standards are too much of a hit on the profit margins. Better to export to an old grandfathered refinery ( out of Country even better ), plus the by products become someone else’s “asset”.
        I think the big reason Obama doesn’t kill XL is because of this…
        http://www.gatewayfacts.ca/about-the-project/project-overview/
        ….Canada’s Gateway to trade with the Pacific Rim ( read China ). No way he lets the Communists get a slice of his 99% export without a fight.
        Robert, I have to confess…I drive a V8 in the hopes of encouraging global warming…it’s so fugging cold up here in the winter we can afford a rise in ambient temps by 5 degrees easy.

        1. ‘Robert, I have to confess…I drive a V8 in the hopes of encouraging global warming…it’s so fugging cold up here in the winter we can afford a rise in ambient temps by 5 degrees easy.’
          I have to get new tires this week . I’m hoping to get – as knobby- tires as I have now to maintain the jacked up presence of the truck-truck to intimidate those goddamn motherfucking scabs all the idiots are driving these days.
          All the ‘ moronicans’ lurve their Priuses. Biggest joke ever. Let’s mine the fucking world dry of all the nickel to power our battery powered cars. That should cure our oil dependency. Until we are down to completely solar
          powered vehicles and bicycles , there’s no good answer.
          Up to that time, …. v8’s ftw !

        2. There is a decommissioned nickel mine in Flin Flon Manitoba that would love to keep the battery juice flowing E2me!

        3. ‘There is a decommissioned nickel mine in Flin Flon Manitoba that would love to keep the battery juice flowing E2me!’
          Izzat the one they decided to grow gubbermint ganj out of ?
          Flintabatty Floniton would be shocked. I had considered
          reaching out and consulting on that one. Got a soft spot
          for the hometown/province.

        4. Don’t know ’bout the grow op. Must have a lot of power available there to keep a grow warm in that godforsaken wooded tundra.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.