Bigfoot News October 7, 2013

Dr. Brian Sykes positive Bigfoot DNA findings apparently confirmed. This fascinating post listing the major new books on rights agents hotlists has, in the 6th paragraph, this very interesting report about the Sykes study:

Luigi Bonomi Associates is bringing Karen Swan’s Christmas at Claridges, a tale set in London and Italy, with UK and Commonwealth rights sold to Macmillan. Sarah Skye’s Code Red Lipstick follows a teenage model-turned-spy investigating her father’s death, with world rights signed by Scholastic.
In non-fiction, former Capitol Hill press secretary Ion Valaskis examine how mistakes inform us in The Magnificent Mistake, on submission. End Game: Tipping Point for Planet Earth by Professor Tony Barnosky looks at our failing environment, with HarperCollins signing UK rights. Professor Bryan Sykes’ The Yeti Enigma explores the yeti myth, with his surprising findings now on submission.

Note the underlined text. The book, The Yeti Enigma, should be coming out soon. The show, the name of which we do not know, is scheduled to air in three parts on the UK’s Channel 4 towards the end of 2013. One of my sources confirmed this in a phone call to the channel that is airing the show.
A surprising finding now on submission can only mean one thing. Sykes has discovered the Bigfoots or Yetis actually exist. Discovering that they do not exist would hardly be surprising. Only a positive finding would be described as surprising. This is of course exactly what I have been reporting for a week or so now – a positive finding on Bigfoot DNA from Sykes.
The shameful Todd Disotell. Todd Disotell is a geneticist who firmly insists that there is no such thing as Bigfoots, Yetis or any other relict hominids, or any cryptids at all, for that matter. He has been examining samples purportedly from such cryptids for some time now, and of course he always gets exactly the result he expects: that they do not exist. This is because Todd does science backwards. He begins with a conclusion “There is no such thing as Bigfoot.” Then he tests his “Bigfoot” sample and of course he ends up with exactly the finding that he wanted to get. He is actually working backwards! Instead of ending with a conclusion, he begins with one. I am sure that makes things so much easier!
Here is some information from Dr. Melba Ketchum about how Todd was given some excellent samples from Matilda the Bigfoot at the Adrian Erickson’s Kentucky site. Todd was sent some blood from Matilda and got human MtDNA in the result, so he assumed it was contaminated with human DNA. However, the sample was completely pure with no contamination at all.
After getting his finding, he threw the rest of the sample away! Adrian Erickson furious at this clown. Luckily, Adrian kept back some of his sample and was able to test it with other labs. Can you believe that this idiot commands high prices for regular TV appearances as an “expert?” I don’t either. I think Todd ought to change his name to Fraud. All hail Fraud Disotell! Via Ketchum:

To clarify: I do not know T.(redacted) Disotell. When Adrian Erickson came to our project, he told me that he had sent an aliquot of the red Sasquatch’s blood to Disotell for testing. AE has results and correspondence as proof. He was extremely upset because Disotell had destroyed the sample. Disotell got human mitochondrial DNA sequence when he tested the sample and didn’t believe that it came from a Sasquatch. He told the PhD on Erickson’s staff that somebody must have hoaxed it.
He said this in spite of the fact that the study was well monitored by Dennis Pfohl who is extremely credible was in control of the food trap start to finish. If it was hoaxed, our genetic testing showed the suspect would be a red headed female, which obviously Dennis is not. In addition, the whole genome SNP testing excluded this individual (the red headed female) as being 100% human with results close to 20% below the human threshold.
After Disotell destroyed the DNA (Mr. Erickson’s staff had requested the remaining sample be returned), another aliquot that had been retained by Erickson was sent to Paleo Labs in Canada. They also obtained human results on the mitochondrial DNA. Finally, AE sent the remainder of the DNA to our study and had Paleo Labs send what they had left also. Our lab also obtained human mitochondrial sequence. These were all independent tests using different laboratories.
We then began testing the sample using several platforms to obtain nuclear DNA sequences and profiles. This sample like all of the other samples in the study yielded human sequence as well as unknown sequence. Disotell specializes in evolution using mitochondrial DNA. He is not qualified to comment on the genomics or other disciplines in this study.
Like he said on the Joe Rogan show, our project used “some of the latest cutting edge science” that he is not expert on–he admits “I can’t follow 3/4 of that paper.” The raw data for this paper continues to be available as separate files with the manuscript. He is a perfect example of the scientific bias we have faced.

Photos of findings from the Ketchum project. Here are some photos of hairs and a tree structure that revealed an excellent hair source. These photos were presented at the recent news conference.

Hair analysis of hairs used in the Ketchum project.
Hair analysis of hairs used in the Ketchum project.

Photo of tree structure that revealed Bigfoot hairs in Ketchum's project.
Photo of tree structure that revealed Bigfoot hairs in Ketchum’s project.

Ketchum’s peer review. It does appear that Ketchum underwent some sort of a peer review at a journal called JAMEZ. The documents have been posted online, and they do appear to be genuine. Here is more: some correspondence between Ketchum and the journal.
Peer review correspondence between Ketchum and the JAMEZ journal.
Peer review correspondence between Ketchum and the JAMEZ journal.

The Ketchum haters have long screamed that the paper never passed peer review. Once again they are proven wrong. So much of what they screamed about her has turned out to be not true. Ketchum is a Machiavellian Dark Triad type individual and I would personally trust her about as far as I could throw her. If you get involved with her business or project wise, she will probably screw you and back-stab you at some point. But a vast number of Bigfooters, especially the higher echelons, are Dark Triad types. She is what she is, and they are what they are. Anyway, this is science, not a popularity contest.
I think Melba’s science is probably pretty good. She has been ripped into a thousand pieces over her science, and it is simply disgusting and shameful what has been done to this woman. It turns my stomach to think of it.
New Erickson Project videos released; Erickson Project website back up. Sasquatch The Quest, the EP site, is now back up. It looks pretty nice but it fails pretty badly in my browser, which is Firefox 22.0 What is it, an IE-only site? Very unprofessional. However, I must say that his site looks better than Ketchum’s unprofessional catastrophes of websites (she has had several, all horrible) and especially Rick Dyer’s nightmarishly bad websites.
The first video has some interesting footage of Bigfoots and the different colors they come in. One shot shows an absolutely huge creature.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpjiWs2dNDU&feature=youtu.be]
The second shows the very controversial footage of Matilda the Bigfoot from the Kentucky site. This is said to be identical to a Wookie Chewbacca mask that is on sale, however, if you look at the Wookie Chewbacca mask and the creature, there is no match.
The typical Chewy mask used to compare with Matilda to show that Matilda is a human wearing a mask. But there is no match.
The typical Chewy mask used to compare with Matilda to show that Matilda is a human wearing a mask. But there is no match.

This creature cannot possibly be a person wearing that mask. It is not possible.
This photo of possibly a different mask looks better but is still no match.
This photo of possibly a different mask looks better but is still no match. Also the hair looks completely different and frankly Matilda’s hair looks like her mother’s hair in the Sleeping Bigfoot video.

One problem with the video is that the creatures mouth remains open and does not appear to move, which suggests a mask. However, later in the video, she growls at the camerawoman, so I assume (or hope) her mouth moves then. Scott Carpenter has done some superb work comparing the mask to the video and there is no match.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptP-4cLy934&feature=youtu.be]
The last one shows night vision of Matilda walking through the woods on a game trail at night. Note that she walks exactly like Patty from the Patterson footage.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQnyUBb0JeM&feature=youtu.be]
Description of Matilda from someone who saw the film. I believe this description comes from either Mary Green or Matt Moneymaker.
Nose similar to ours (but with larger nostrils)
Slightly chapped, rosy lips
Pink mouth, blackish tongue
Pointed teeth, like fangs
Deep set eyes that dart around and don’t blink
Her head is round, shaped more like ours than a gorilla’s, but her brow is much more prominent
She has lots of fine, flowing hair on her head (dark reddish brown) and soft short hair on her face
When she walks away, she moves just like the female in the Patterson Film.
She has a black tongue. Assuming this is someone in a mask, what did they do, paint the person’s tongue black? How did the person wearing the mask learn to walk away precisely like Patty? Tell me.
More Erickson Project videos from the press conference. Here are some shots taken by one of the reporters who attended the conference.
Screenshot of Matilda from the Erickson/Ketchum press conference.
Screenshot of Matilda from the Erickson/Ketchum press conference.

Matilda analyzed
A second screen shot, this time with annotations done by the reporter.

Stan Courtney shows a Bigfoot in a game cam at night. This excellent analysis shows what does appear to be a Bigfoot captured in a game cam at night. The photo quality is not so good, but it appears to be a genuine creature.
The Bigfoot is apparently in the center of the photo.
The Bigfoot is apparently in the center of the photo.

Unretouched large version of the photo above.
Unretouched large version of the photo above.

The same object blow up. Looks like a Bigfoot all right.
The same object blow up. Looks like a Bigfoot all right.

Interesting Bigfoot photo out of Pennsylvania. A town in Pennsylvania had a festival over the weekend that featured a Bigfoot calling contest. After the festival was over, a man and his wife were returning from the festivities when they saw what looked like two Bigfoots off the road in the forest moving slowly away in the direction of festival where the calling contest had taken place. The man pulled off to the side of the road and snapped about 9 nice photos of the objects.
Skeptards quickly “proved this is a hoax” by “proving that it is actually an upended tree root. However, an investigator went back to the scene with the cameraman, and there are no upended tree roots there. Before and after shots show the objects before and then the objects are not there. It does appear that he photographed one or more real Bigfoots. Unfortunately the objects are rather indistinct. Details here.
Distance shot of the Stoneman Bigfoots.
Distance shot of the Stoneman Bigfoots.

Closeup shot of the strange Stoneman Bigfoots. The other photos are copyrighted by Stoneman and I do not want to steal them.
Closeup shot of the strange Stoneman Bigfoots. The other photos are copyrighted by Stoneman and I do not want to steal them.

Fascinating Frank White Bigfoot photo from Bellingham, Washington in 1976. Never seen this photo before, but it sure looks nice.
Very nice photo from 1976, when very few folks were hoaxing Bigfoot photos. Could well be real.
Very nice photo from 1976, when very few folks were hoaxing Bigfoot photos. Could well be real.

Superb rundown by Scott Carpenter on why the Matilda footage cannot possibly be a person wearing the Wookie mask. Great analysis by Scott here. I agree with him.
Note the massive underbite on Matilda. Odd feature for a mask.
Note the massive underbite on Matilda. Odd feature for a mask.

Once again note the possible double tooth rows or straight tongue.
Note the possible double tooth rows or straight tongue.

Note the black gums and the possible double rows of teeth. Recall that Dyer claims that Hank has double teeth. Note also the many reports of giant skeletons from back East in the 19th Century, often with double rows of teeth. We may be onto something here. She also may have a straight tongue, and most masks have no tongue.
Note the black gums and once again the possible double rows of teeth. Recall that Dyer claims that Hank has double teeth. Note also the many reports of giant skeletons from back East in the 19th Century, often with double rows of teeth. We may be onto something here. She also may have a straight tongue, and most masks have no tongue.

Note the strong prognathism of the jutting lower jaw. Haven't seen too many masks with that. Also that is no match for the Chewy masks, which have zero prognathism, not to mention lower jaw prognathism.
Note the strong prognathism of the jutting lower jaw. Haven’t seen too many masks with that. Also that is no match for the Chewy masks, which have zero prognathism, not to mention lower jaw prognathism.

Closeup photo of my Bigfoot hair. I have received several Bigfoot hairs. Here is a closeup photo of one of them.
The hairs were analyzed on a number of different levels and they do appear to be Bigfoot hairs. The scaling is quite a bit different from human hairs. Bears have similar scaling, but the hairs are light and reddish, and all bears in Michigan are black.
The hairs were analyzed on a number of different levels and they do appear to be Bigfoot hairs. The scaling is quite a bit different from human hairs. Bears have similar scaling, but the hairs are light and reddish, and all bears in Michigan are black.

Melissa Hovey copyright infringement case – total insanity. Here is a description of this idiotic case which was thrown out of court. Hovey received the famous Hovey photo, which does show a real Bigfoot, from an unknown person. She put a copyright on it simply as a placeholder to keep others from copyrighting it and stealing it, something that Bigfooter scumbags do all the time.
However, later Phil Poling put it up on his site in a video. Hovey screamed copyright infringement and ordered him to take it down. Then this crazy woman sued Poling for $75,000 in court. Truth is that Hovey had no right to copyright it in the first place, so she did not even own that copyright. So obviously this nuisance frivolous lawsuit was thrown out of court.
Completely ridiculous MABRC libel lawsuit. Darkwing DW Lee of MABRC and those around him are simply some of the worst people in Bigfootery. They go beyond the usual idiocy into out and out dangerousness. Threats, death threats, pipe bombs going off at Bigfoot conferences, all of these things have been associated with DW and his gang of sociopaths. Randy Harrington, DW’s sidekick, is a particularly awful person. John Phillips sued DW and Harrington for defamation due to some statements that DW made. In one of them he called Phillips’ daughter a dyke. It is not even known if she is a lesbian or not.
Anyway, Phillips sued for an outrageous $1.2 million. Like total morons, DW and Harrington failed to show up in court. Phillips won by default and DW at least apparently owes Mr. Phillips $1.2 million. That is probably the stupidest thing DW has ever done in his life. Gruesome details here.
Skeptard idiocy regarding Bigfoot. One of the skeptard arguments against Bigfoot is that if these things existed, people would be seeing them all the time. Well, they do exist, and people actually do see them pretty regularly. You would be amazed at how people I know personally who have seen these things. The argument goes something like this:
Eyewitness #1 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #2 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #3 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #4 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #5 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #6 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #7 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #8 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #9 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
Eyewitness #10 – “I saw a Bigfoot”.
Skeptic – “Though I wasn’t there, no you didn’t”.
… Skeptic – “If these creatures were real, people would be seeing them all the time!”
Joe – (Sigh)
See what sort of crap we are up against from “science” crowd?
Special dedication to all my haters. Like Rick Dyer, I am accumulating lots of haters myself. I suppose everyone in this game does at some point.
Therefore, I am dedicating this song especially towards my deadliest enemies, including:
The JREF skeptards, in particular, the execrable Sharon Hill, Jodie and Mustbeso. Truly and painfully useless human beings.
The debased and degraded nothingness that constitutes the administrators at Bigfoot Forums, may they burn in Hell for eternity.
Rhettman Mullis, idiot.
Carl Zimmer, famous “science” writer. That this man is a famous science writer is truly pitiful.
The “science” skeptard crowd in general, may you suffer prolonged pain for your cardinal transgressions.
Enjoy!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99KkbFjZR20]
Rick Dyer uses gorilla hand on the back of his CD After the Shot. This has already been reveled on several blog sites. However, Frank Cali told me in an email that that was only used as a filler. If indeed photos of Hank the dead Bigfoot are owned by the investor, then no photo of Hank could possibly appear on the back of the DVD. From the comments:

I think too much has been read into the gorilla hand saga. I think it was just an image used to fill the back cover that was relevant to the contents of the DVD. If there is a real body, then of course a read pic of the hand could not be shown. Its just purely a graphic image to be in keeping with the contents and nothing more than that……?

Nevertheless, I think this was a very stupid mistake by whoever did it because it makes Dyer look like he is hoaxing this whole thing.
Theory about who owns the body of Hank and any images of him. From the comments:

I reckon as soon as Hank was shot, then the body and all the rights including footage of him dead belonged to the investor. I think Dyer and Morgan Matthews were silenced about the kill. And the investor has wanted to remain anon until the big reveal. I think Dyer did get paid up front and has been spending the money like water. His shows, his claims since Sept 6th are all just for personal attention and to give publicity on the investor’s behalf.
If you shot a Bigfoot and were paid and then told that your job was done, and if you had a personality like Dyer, well you wouldn’t want to rest on your laurels and remain quiet and not try and gain some sort of attention while you waited for the big reveal would you? I think that those DVD’s belong to the investor, and Rick is merely publicizing them and he will maybe have a cut in their sales. I think the investor has made it very very clear right from the start that they wish to remain silent throughout all this until the reveal. I think Dyer is very much controlled by the investor.
When December comes and the scientists give their announcement (which I reckon will coincide and may even be in collaboration with Sykes’ results) then any footage of dead Hank will be released (I think Minnow will be able to show more footage caught on camera and will release a Director’s Cut version of the film too). And I think people who have bought the DVD’s will actually see a real dead Bigfoot, and I obviously do think there will be a real Bigfoot body.
The tour however, that bothers me. All I wonder is that the publicity that Rick is telling us is a lie, and the tour will actually be organized on a higher level with more money, publicity and security.

Rick Dyer spinning more tales. Rick now says that the filming of Hank and the goings on surrounding his body were done by a film crew hired by Rick’s investor, not Rick himself. Rick had earlier stated that Rick himself had hired the film crew and had to pay them $20,000. He was trying to recoup some of that money via DVD sales. Now it turns out he never spent $20K on the crew. In fact, he did not spend one red center. Rick’s stories just go all over the place, here, there and everywhere.
Dyer’s investor paying for university to study Hank. The investor is apparently paying for the university to study the Bigfoot body. This is a new revelation, that a particular university has been tasked with this job. We now hear for the first time also that that the university folks are being paid to do this work.
Dyer’s latest logo. I guess you either love it or hate it. I actually do not particularly mind it. I think the lettering might have been positioned a bit differently, but it’s not a major issue. Most of Rick’s graphics, webpages, etc. are horrifically bad, but this one is actually pretty good.

New Rick Dyer logo is actually not bad.
New Rick Dyer logo is actually not bad.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

64 thoughts on “Bigfoot News October 7, 2013”

  1. how does the proof for the existence of bigfoot change science humanity the paranormal culture linguistics news ? assuming bigfoot is an animal and not a supernatural phantom ufo alien or other dimensional being.

      1. for me i guess it depends on just how intelligent these creatures are. if they are chimpanzee-level i don’t think it changes much but if they have near-human level, then in effect there are 2 human-level intelligent species on earth.

        1. I think there will also be an issue of the scientists dismissing something which has been seen, heard, felt etc. by thousands of people but not taken seriously.

        2. to think that thier brains are larger than ours and we only use 20 percent of ours i think its highly likely they have intelligents close to ours. The’re bigger , faster, stonger and smarter than us and the have night vision. Why would the government not want a better soldier. The fact that nobody in the government has ever taken an interest is puzzling.

        3. There is a lot of controversy about how smart these things are. IN some ways, they are utterly brilliant and way smarter than we are. But IMHO in other ways, they are almost as dumb as a mountain lion or a wolf. they cannot understand our language or our laws and you cannot reason with them, and once in a while, they become violently irrational and just smash stuff up.
          At the Kentucky site at one point, the couple went out at night and as they were leaving, they saw the Bigfoots in the woods. They pulled over and tried to make contact with them, but it was not successful. When they came back, the damned Bigfoots had gone to the house and smashed all of the windshields on all of their cars for basically no reason whatsoever.
          They are unpredictable and completely irrational at times. I would not want to habituate one of them. If a human kills another human, we catch him and put him on trial. If a Bigfoot kills one of us humans, WE WILL HAVE TO PUT HIM DOWN. They do NOT have the same rights as we do. They have more rights than animals but less rights than us. We will need to construct a whole new set of laws to deal with them. The law and philosophy journals will be going crazy.

        4. Big G, please explain to me exactly how we only use 20% of our brains? biology and evolution does not work that way,no organism grows extra or bigger body parts that are useless and serve no purpose, all that brain tissue in your head is there because it’s being used, would you be willing to prove me wrong by removing 80% of it? I think not. I’m sorry Big G, I’m not trying to be a prick or anything like that, but that thing about us using only a small fraction of our brain is a very old misconception that still lingers to this day and everytime I hear someone repeat it I feel obligated to correct this false claim.

        5. I talked to a neuropsychologist about this once and he told me it is a myth. He said actually we use EVERY part of our brains ALL of the time. Although with a lot of folks, if you spend some time around them, you really wonder if that is true.

      2. You know just how important a discovery to science and human history is bigfoot? i think everything from the microscope and microbes to evolution to newton einstein physics is very important.
        for me the only reason bigfoot might be important is that like dolphins they may have high intelligence.

  2. Dyer has nothing as well as everyone else mentioned here>>NOTHING.
    Next up at bat is Dyer on dec 15. He will have NOTHING.

  3. Good report Robert. I am looking forward to Sykes’ info being shared and hopefully tying in to the SGP. I’m behind Erickson’s team all the way. Their approach makes sense to me. I think he is a man of his word that could be trusted in bigfootery.

  4. WOW, Robert, WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!
    On the Yeti enigma: sounds great when one read it first. But is the expression “surprising finds” THIS promising after the second reading? I mean, for believers like you and me?! Remember the book by mountaineer Reinhold Messner “The Yeti”back in 1998 in which he promises before publication that he has the proof for the existence of the Yeti and it turned out that he thought the yeti is nothing more than the Tibetan brown bear?
    On Disotell: what a douchebag in every sense of the world! I watched three TV interviews with him and he is just crap, this man. Does not matter if the Ketchum study is not real science (or not?). Disotell is as bad as his haircut…

  5. The Yeti Enigma: if I would be the publisher I would call it “sensational” and not just “surprising”. So I have my doubts that this is real good news for believers.

    1. I agree, Joerg, but the word “surprising” holds more promise that the word “interesting”, which they could have used.

  6. Impressive update. Thanks for that.
    However , you are responsible for cheap chardonnay exiting my nose this evening.
    I’ll have more critique. I had a hard workout and an exhausting weekend.
    I just have to touch on some of the entertaining parts.
    -Todd Disotell. He’s kind of a nobody and I always regarded HIM with skepticism due to his poor hairstyle choice. Nice of you to call him out.
    ( chuckled at that )
    -Melissa Hovey. Such a shrill mouthpiece. I think she is a teapartier. At least a Repugnican. Gag.
    ( chortled, wine made it up the back of the throat)
    – Mabrc. I had actually thunk aboot them the other day. It was kind of a reflective moment on how disgusting folks in footery can actually be.
    ( was into a full on laugh, had to wipe a little ‘ Big Kahuna’ off the screen.)
    – BFF. I’ve tried to be understanding, but I see your point. I stepped off posting there when I finally got a warning for a post that was 3 months old.
    I had typed the word a$$ and the knuckle dragging,low brow, mouth breather that fills in for the other chimps when real thinking needs to be done , decided he didn’t like my subversive ways and HAD to penalize me.
    I left.
    There’s ONE person posting one there I like to follow. Otherwise I avoid, avoid , avoid.
    (Toasted you with that one)
    – Then that fucking POS portrait at the end.
    ( that’s when it came out the nose)
    Did not expect to be so entertained.
    Grassyass.

  7. Nice update Robert. I guess your hangover wasn’t too bad?LOL. Tempted to get my hopes up about Sykes’ “surprising” findings. Do you think Erickson is still holding out on the really good stuff or is what they released the best of it? And if they have better footage do you think we will have to wait for the full documentary? Or was the press conference it and the documentary has been shelved? Keep dem dare updates comin amigo!

  8. We think you have three channels: One dedicated to cheese, one on boiled meat dishes and one on dental work.

  9. The big foot is a neanderthal. Theres is three tipes of Neanderthals. The one that have porphirya and need blood to survive, the energetic one and the mi sot them (porphiric and energetic).
    Some images of porphyria:
    Werewolf porphyria, there’s more examples in internet. In the wiki (if they haven’t chaged it, it says that one kind of secondary disease of porphyria is the grown of a lot of hair in all the body)
    http://featured.sciencesblog.org/hair-hair-go-away-hypertrichosis/
    http://fooyoh.com/issue/oddnews/7669295
    “dark skinned”: in fact it’s a bad production of the blood, bad emoglobine or something.
    http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/260889/view
    Some Neanderthals can’t stand sunlight (vampire “myth”), that’s what happens:
    http://trialx.com/curebyte/2011/05/22/photos-related-to-porphyria/
    Some Neanderthals have a childish mentality, they are the faes or satires, etc, of antiquity:
    http://vimeo.com/59829805
    Skin desorders:
    http://forum.goregrish.com/threads/strange-illness-gunter-porphyria.17466/
    Nice images:
    http://www.medmemoweb.com/archives/2006/08/porphyria_cutan_1.html
    It seems that original Neanderthals were whites, with red hear and grey eyes.
    Neanderthals are parasites and they principal food are feelings. The porphiric ones need to manipulate the feelings (in a bad way: hate, crazyness, fear, corruption, heartbreakers, hunting, rage, criminals, physical pain, etc). The feelings change the taste of blood. That’s important for the blood sacrifices, as made in the ziggurats, pyramids or temples, as the Vatican is: temple of Jupiter.
    Some examples:
    La Capilla de los Huesos de Évora.
    http://tejiendoelmundo.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/la-capilla-de-los-huesos-de-evora/
    La iglesia de huesos
    http://antidepresivo.net/2007/08/17/la-iglesia-de-huesos/
    Zigurats
    https://www.google.es/search?q=vaticano+craneos&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=o8xTUsO-A8fKtAakoIDYBg&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=750&dpr=1#q=zigurats&tbm=isch&imgdii=_
    The big foot is one kind of Neanderthal. Hi has porphyria desease and are among the most agresives and hunters of cromagnons. Their fisical disease is hair in all the body, the “mytical werewolf”.
    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Man-Who-Turned-Werewolf-from-Wine-Tells-His-Story-102391.shtml
    Another habitude is to deform their heads. In some tombs strange skulls are fonded. It’s only a mitraic habitude, they aren’t extraterrestrial, it’s only a head deformed with pression from the birth. Be careful with the intoxicacions with ufo’s, etc.
    http://mindhacks.com/2010/02/23/decorative-skull-reshaping/
    http://unaantropologaenlaluna.blogspot.com.es/2012/04/un-templo-medida-las-deformaciones.html
    http://malkun.blogspot.com.es/2010_02_01_archive.html
    http://www.mesoweb.com/features/tiesler/03.html
    The Egyptians and Sumerians, etc did it also, and in Old Greece: Cephalonia islands.
    Psicopaths, see vlad tepes, isabelle bathory or atila the hun, who ate his father and brother.

  10. One possibly significant difference between Matilda and the Wookie mask is how far apart Matilda’s eyes are compared with the mask. Is there a video of Matilda walking away anywhere?
    Great post Mr Lindsay, thank you.

  11. I was going to post a comment but Harlen has presented such an expert argument against the facts that I feel anything I say will just be quickly debunked.

      1. i used to get those in texts from my ex like i wasn’t listening. I just assumed it was for ” RETARD YELLING ” But i could be wrong.

  12. As always great work Robert. so it seems the leading relic is homo hieglenisis. poor spelling but im trying to form a timeline. and these homini where leaving Africa around the same time as erectus for the same reasons. so possible numerious homini were in Europe at the same time and probably interbread.

    1. That’s one of the theories, Big G. The issue I have with it is this, is that whilst Heidelbergensis fits the bill physically – very big, very strong, very fast – there are indications that they had some sort of culture. Meldrum feels that might be a retrograde step in social evolution. On the other hand, if that culture involved burying their dead … well … that’s interesting.

      1. I saw yesterday that there was a size issue with heidel. do we have any specimens from farther north with a larger frame. Also we have many Neanderthals because they seem to frequent caves more often. since bigfoot seems to like the open is it possible that homo heidel has left no bones farther north because they didn’t frequent caves.

        1. Remains of Heidelbergensis have been found in Africa, Europe, Israel and China. They had the opportunity to travel your way if Jack Rink is right in his comments that new findings indicate they might still have been around 12 000 years ago. However, that information came from a clip I saw of him speaking – I don’t have any other source for it.

        2. Lesley wouldn’t it be possible that all homini from colder climates had a larger statuer. Im thinking about some of the viking bones that indicated some males where well into the 7 foot range and several were 8 ft tall.

        3. Big G,
          That would certainly fit in with Bergmann’s law. He noted that within the same species of warm-blooded animals, which human’s are, populations having slightly smaller individuals are more often found in warm climates near the equator, while those with greater mass, are found further from the equator in colder regions.

        4. There are LOTS of Heidelbergensis remains in Europe over a long period of time. It is thought they they gave rise to us down in Africa. Rhodesiensis may have been a Heidelbergensis. There are problems with defining exactly what a Heidelbergensis is and there is tremendous variation in the specimens.

    2. Thank you so much G! Heidelbergensis was in Europe for a very, very long time. They were also in Africa for a very long time, including possibly recently. They are known from China only 13,000 YBP. Heidelbergensis is considered to be a direct ancestor of us. He is considered to be “archaic Sapiens.”

    1. because he has common sense and can put 2 and 2 together?! Robert needs no exit strategy in December….tick-tock-tick-tock…;-)

    1. Hasn’t been made yet….Cali says(Oct 6 video) they only have a ‘prototype’ of the cover so far and the finished product is not ready yet.

  13. Jacki is there any satellite feed that can be seen over here on the other side of the pond. At least the BBc can be seen here. Is channel 4 associated with a network. With electricity. I would like to see what sykes has. pbs plays alot of british stuff like the one with the bucket lady. And dont forget dountin abbey.

    1. Lol!
      You still around Jackie? I thought you would have had enough of Bigfoot after what you were exposed to over the last year or so.
      Complete insanity.
      MMG

    2. thanks jacki . too bad you haven’t tried tv from another country. we have 1000 channels and nothing on. Unless of course you like house wives of every major city. they are on most channels. its amazing how the iq of the US has dropped over the last 15 years. Is it any wonder pos is so popular.

  14. Where are we going to get a video of a bigfoot walking bipedally. I just did a bing search and your not going to believe this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.