Bigfoot News September 11, 2013

Dr. Bryan Sykes study may well prove that Bigfoots exist. From multiple sources, I have now received the news that not only will the Sykes DNA study publish soon, it will also prove that Bigfoots exist. None of the sources would tell me this in so many words, but they certainly implied that the findings would be positive. So I am looking forward to publication of the study. On the other hand, it is possible though not likely that the sources are all wrong and the study could be negative. Rick Dyer dead Bigfoot video is taking orders now. Dyer’s video After the Shot is now on sale for $129. It is said to contain 45 minutes of HD footage of the dead Bigfoot, Hank, that Rick definitely shot and killed in San Antonio, Texas last year. Rick says that the film was shot soon after the shooting by a film crew from a film company that he is associated with in some way. Rick says he had to pay the film crew $20,000 for their efforts. He is only selling 100 copies, so he should make $13,000 off this video. Therefore, he is not even making his money back. Dyer says that the crew did an excellent job, much better than Rick could do, in shooting the movie, and that it looks very nice and professional. They will get 100 orders and then ship the video. This is so they can make at least $13K before the video goes viral on the Internet as they fully expect it to do. The videos have not yet started shipping, so Dyer has not yet received 100 orders. Each copy has some sort of markers on it to distinguish it from all of the others. Therefore, if anything gets uploaded to the Net, Dyer says he will know who put it up there he will sue the pants off them. However, almost no one is ever sued for uploading copyrighted content to the Web. The DMCA was written to avoid the lawsuit abuse associated with pirating videos. In general, a DMCA takedown order is issued to the website or whoever put the video up there. Youtube will ban you if you get three DMCA orders. In addition, Youtube protects its uploaders and will not give out their name to any copyright holders to avoid lawsuit abuse. There is an extremely stupid and evil law that was written a while back that actually makes it a federal offense to upload copyrighted material to the Internet. Two people have so far been prosecuted under this idiotic law. One fellow uploaded a copy of a new Star Wars movie to the Net and Lucasfilm went after him. Curious incident when someone pretended to order a copy of Dyer’s new video. Someone pretended to order a copy of the new video After the Shot and the order came up After the Hoax instead of After the Shot. The person who faked the order says they think Dyer got the title mixed up because he was working on some other video about the 2008 Dyer Bigfoot hoax. Obviously the skeptics are going to have a great time with this news! It is recommended that Dyer skeptics get their hands on the video. The skeptics insist that this video is a hoax using a dummy prop as a dead Bigfoot. Although Christopher Noel and I disagree with that and feel that there is probably a real dead Bigfoot in the video, the possibly yet exists that this video may be a gigantic hoax. As the movie has not yet shipped, there is no evidence one way or the other whether this video is real or faked. However, if it is fake and the skeptics can prove it, Dyer is taking a huge risk. He would be risking interstate commerce fraud for promising a video of a real Bigfoot and delivering a clever hoax. In addition, to the criminal offenses, Rick would be civilly liable and could be sued for damages in civil court by anyone who bought the video. I would like to see the skeptics get their hands on some of this video or stills from it at the very least so they can try to debunk it. Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization catches possible Bigfoot on video. [youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qu3b4JkiqY] In this video shot in Rough Hollow, Utah by the RMSO, there are 38 seconds of a possible Bigfoot seen from 2:16 to 2:54. The Bigfoot goes from a crouching position to a kneeling position to all the way down on its stomach. The possible movements are very slow and deliberate so as not to cause notice. The possible creature is in dark black in the video and was not noticed until later on. Skeptics are saying it is a stump or a cave overhang or a shadow, but it appears to move. Do stumps, cave overhangs and shadows move while you are filming them? Overall, a good video. Possible juvenile Bigfoot filmed in Havana, Florida on a game cam. [youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tf0Mh9-tY94] The video above just shows a still from the game cam. There is a very interesting shadow there that could well be a juvenile Bigfoot. It does somewhat resemble the Jacobs juvenile Bigfoot photo from a game cam in Pennsylvania. Those photos are definitely pictures of a juvenile Bigfoot. It can’t be anything else. This Havana photo may be a juvenile Bigfoot, and then again, it may just be a stump or a shadow. Vladimir Putin believes that Yetis are real. Very interesting. Putin is the Prime Minister of Russia, and it is said that he believes that Yetis are real. We need more celebrity believers. I am quite certain that if Bigfoots are real then Yetis will be proven to be real someday too. A source close to the Ketchum Project told me that an initial male-female peaks study of a Yeti sample by Ketchum showed that they were related to Bigfoots but not the same species. The entire sample was used up by the quick and dirty test, and there was no more to test. Ketchum also stated herself that she believes that Yetis are real in addition to Bigfoots being real.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
20
fb-share-icon20

49 thoughts on “Bigfoot News September 11, 2013”

  1. Let`s see if the videos really exist, get shipped to Dyer and if they then get send out to customers as soon as possible. You mentioned the legal implications. Is Dyer really this stupid or ignorant? I have the feeling: No. However, IF the videos really exist and they reach the general public, then it gets really interesting. Decision time. About the Sykes study: would just be fantastic if these rumours are really true.

  2. To RL;
    Happened to see this about the Minnesota Iceman being put back on display again. I’m sure you are aware of the ‘Iceman’ story from the ’60’s.
    What got me is that this ‘exhibit’ is in Austin, Texas…..perhaps RD is selling his video of his visit there….he doesn’t claim that the ‘dead bigfoot’ in his video is the one he shot.
    anyway….I thought is was some what of a coincidence…site has a couple of pics also:
    Thanks for your time,
    J.Lucas
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/28/minnesota-iceman-photos_n_3517680.html
    In the 1960s, the “Minnesota Iceman” was paraded from mall to fairground, leaving rumors of Bigfoot,
    missing links and government conspiracy in its wake.
    Then, just as quickly as the 6-foot-tall frozen beast surfaced, it vanished — until now.
    Earlier this year, Steve Busti — owner of the Museum of the Weird in Austin, Texas —
    bought the ice man from the family of its original owner in Minnesota. He’s going to once
    again reveal the ape-like creature to the world starting July 3 at his museum.
    Before his big purchase, Busti spent the last two years researching the Minnesota Iceman
    and trying to pin down its location. He found that the original exhibitor, Frank Hansen,
    had it in a freezer at his home for decades after its last showing. It’s still unclear
    why the big, hairy popsicle’s tour abruptly ended.
    Somehow, Hansen managed to keep Mr. Freeze out of the public eye until he died about
    10 years ago. Busti also learned that rumors of the Minnesota Iceman being discovered
    in Siberia were untrue.
    “[Hansen] shot it in Wisconsin — its eyeball’s blown out and its arm is broken,”
    Busti told HuffPost Weird News. “I couldn’t believe it had been in Minnesota the entire time.”
    Hansen froze the remains and put them on display. What’s not explained, however,
    is what the Minnesota Iceman really is. It’s big. Hair covers its entire body.
    And it doesn’t look too happy. It’s easy to see why many continue to think it’s
    proof of Bigfoot, and why others think it’s simply a primate. From Wisconsin.
    Below are two never-before-seen photos from Hansen’s collection in the late 60s.
    Busti wouldn’t show us photos of the Minnesota Iceman in its current state.
    You’ll have to head to Texas to see for yourself.

  3. On the Sykes study: also the first “rumours” sound very promising (for believers like me), one has to be cautious. Remember the DNA brought back by a British TV expedition to Bhutan in 2001 or 2002? The hair samples from a place called Sakteng were handed over to Sykes. Sykes told the press after the first check that his team found DNA “never encountered before”? After that nothing was heard from Sykes anymore, but when a British “cryptozoologist” asked him about more conclusive results about one year later, Sykes told him that it was DNA from an Asiatic/Himalayan black bear! Black bear?!! One would think, DNA of such an obvious species would be identified easily during the very first examination. I also wrote an email to his laboratory and they given me the same answer. So, why did Sykes told the press there was “unknown DNA” in it? Just a comment to “advise caution” regarding Sykes – at least for those believers who expect too much from this study.

    1. I wasn’t aware that Sykes had backtracked on the Yeti DNA, or who that cryptozoologist is, but maybe there was a misunderstanding. The hair from the nest found by the Kings yeti hunter yielded unknown DNA. Other samples yielded a hitherto unknown sub-species of Brown Bear. At least that’s how I remember it. Also more recently Sykes tested three hairs from a Russian yeti which strangely turned out to be from an American Black Bear.

  4. Jacki. Just to be clear on what has been said. He called his Investor immediately and his investor had a film crew fly in the next day? How often do you see film crews doing interviews about the movies they are shooting. I do not think you would last long in the industry.
    I am not saying I know it is true. Just clarifying what was actually said. Does not benefit to blow things out of proportion in the other direction. It is far fetched enough as it stands.

    1. There’s 2 things right now that POS. had revealed about his story that have me even further along a doubtfull path. This whole 20k on a film crew and also 30k to rent a reefer truck.
      My take is that he likes the sound of these large sums of money rolling off his tongue and inference that there is substantial money being spent
      (in his mind) leads credence to the story.
      IMHO he does not behave like someone involved in a project with
      substantial financing. He looks and lives like a common person.
      This whole dvd thing just reeks of a ripo-off. As for his TT followers,
      all of them have the appearance and behavior of po-dunk hillbillies.
      No serious investor lets clowns like these run their business. If there would POS would have been shutdown by now.
      I like the exercise in the possible that Senor Lindsay has chosen to follow, I understand why there may be a glimmer of hope. Myself, I am convinced POS is just showboating and the longer this goes on the more thorough his demise. It is somewhat entertaining.

      1. Of course Dyer is showboating. He will have the last laugh.
        Just because he took time to hoax you and some skeptics just confirms his lack of character and morals. It’s the same depraved person who shot and killed an unclassified hominid.
        My take has always been that there is a BF body. I follow Robert because he’s the only one doing an honest job of reporting on what is being said and what he can uncover on his own.
        The 100 unique and watermarked DVDs is a cynical is expose more of the haters. If someone buys and posts one it will provide RD with information on the person who “illegally” post their copy. Just wait for the reality show video of RD and TT knocking on that person’s door.
        I have no respect for Dyer and never will. If you have a low opinion of him now then that opinion shouldn’t go up just because some of what he said turns up as truth. A hoaxer is bad. A hoaxer and killer is another thing altogether.

    2. Per Thylacine;
      ‘My take has always been that there is a BF body. ‘
      I was 50/50 on that . Now I feel 80-90 % likelihood
      no body. There’s lots of intriguing evidence to
      lead someone to believe that POS has a body.
      I tend to feel that the weasel-like inner workings
      of POS’s brain may have shat out this incredible
      insidious story that has folks questioning everything.
      ” If you have a low opinion of him now then that opinion shouldn’t go up just because some of what he said turns up as truth. ‘
      Nah , my regard for POS won’t change. I’ll just feel he is unworthy
      AND a POS.
      CHEERS !

  5. It would seem plausible for Putin to know something about the Yeti what with his history with the KGB and all things secret. I believe there could be atleast a couple different kind or type of bigfoot in the world. Maybe more tha one type in the U.S.A. I’ve thought for years based on reports there might be a human looking BF and one with ape features. Who knows?

  6. The picture of the ‘skunk ape’ is from an old video made by David Shealy in 1999 or 2000. A simple search on David Shealy and skunkape will reveal a lot of info. It is simply reprising an old hoax, something Shealy is well known for.

  7. We’re all familiar with the gorilla, but very few people can name the person who introduced them to the western world. If in fact the discovery of bigfoot is imminent than possibly this $129.00 video is Rick trying to get one last payday before he is forgotten.

  8. Agreed. Why is anyone listening to anything he says. The only thing that can be proven about him is that he can hoax, including the latest “baby bigfoot” incident. He continues to come up with sensational story after story. Suddenly we should believe him when says something new.
    Reporting on him just continues to allow him to hoax. After awhile some of the responsibility of his hoaxing lies on the ones who perpetuate his stories by reporting on him. It’s time to move on. He has been given enough fodder. He continues to bring the BF community down with his amazing stories and promises. We do not need him even if he did shoot a BF. Let him go.
    If this story is true then there certainly are enough people involved to prove this true other than RD or anyone associated with him. Let them come forward. They have not.

  9. Exactly. As I recall, Dyer NEVER said he hired a film crew to immediately come in and film the recovery of the body! I got impression he filmed the recovery and loading with whatever he had there himself. Also, Dyer mentions now we will see the REFER TRUCK there….but Dyer didn’t initially use a refer truck to get the body out the woods. If he actually ships these (which I doubt do to quota not being met), I say this is a STAGED filming..recreation if you will.

  10. Dyer just posted a follow up VID again yesterday..Sept 11. I have a link, but you can find it on You Tube yourself. I don’t want to start posting the Vids here. He says he has sold 11 vids as of yesterday. He thinks that’s GREAT..I say it will be an uphill battle to get to 100. That’s because most of the those who are really interested will be the FIRST to order and momentum for sales will drop precipitously after the initial surge of orders.

  11. Interesting read on the new DVD>>
    http://en.paperblog.com/bigfoot-news-september-11-2013-646721/
    Each copy has some sort of markers on it to distinguish it from all of the others. Therefore, if anything gets uploaded to the Net, Dyer says he will know who put it up there he will sue the pants off them. However, almost no one is ever sued for uploading copyrighted content to the Web. The DMCA was written to avoid the lawsuit abuse associated with pirating videos. In general, a DMCA takedown order is issued to the website or whoever put the video up there. Youtube will ban you if you get three DMCA orders. In addition, Youtube protects its uploaders and will not give out their name to any copyright holders to avoid lawsuit abuse.
    There is an extremely stupid and evil law that was written a while back that actually makes it a federal offense to upload copyrighted material to the Internet. Two people have so far been prosecuted under this idiotic law. One fellow uploaded a copy of a new Star Wars movie to the Net and Lucasfilm went after him.
    Curious incident when someone pretended to order a copy of Dyer’s new video. Someone pretended to order a copy of the new video After the Shot and the order came up After the Hoax instead of After the Shot. The person who faked the order says they think Dyer got the title mixed up because he was working on some other video about the 2008 Dyer Bigfoot hoax. Obviously the skeptics are going to have a great time with this news!

  12. Bottom line..this is a RED HERRING. Dyer doesn’t have the resources to go chasing any potential run away downloading of this DVD. Having said all this…he isn’t going to sell the 100 DVDs *required* anyway, so all this will be MOOT. I think this requirement is a *POISON PILL* that Dyer planted to insure NO DVDs will ever ship. Keep in mind, only Dyer can determine how many DVDs are reserved for shipping..ERGO>>> *FOX IS GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE* on this. We will never see these DVDs released to the public. He will have STOOGES *look at them* and tell us what they saw. He has already pulled this off by stating yesterday a *friend* of his saw the DVD and was awed by it. Same old shit folks.

      1. We don’t know the conditions of the sale agreement do we? He may have a clause that states at least 100 orders must be in place in order to commence shipping. He may also have a non refundable deposit clause.
        Do you really think 100 orders will be placed? Not likely. This DVD is a sham. BTW..he stated all the GOLD and PLATINUM members were supposed to get first dibs on stuff like this..right? Now it’s first in line get’s the goodies???? LOL…

    1. Anyone can make a DVD. It is probably nothing more than a cheap DVD-R made on Dyer’s computer. Did you see that black insert cover on the DVD case? A black background with a bigfoot-print on the cover. Took him all of 10 minutes to make the thing(s)

  13. After all this time I find it perplexing how some people like Robert and others can still have any faith in POS’s claims. On the other hand, POS is an extremely good actor/liar.
    When this story first broke last year, I was sucked up in it too for a short while. I thought maybe he was telling the truth this time and was seriously looking for redemption from the past. I even consulted with others in the community and asked them if they thought it could be legit, they all said, “NO WAY”. But besides this, I did my own research. I watched all of POS’s videos and radio shows, even called in several times to ask questions myself. It quickly became apparent to me that he was lying and hoaxing again. Nothing made any logical sense, he would back-track on previous statements, block people from questioning him further, there was nothing in the mainstream media covering this story whatsoever AND, the entire progression of the way details were being released, was obviously aimed at making as much money money as possible in increments.
    I wish I could help more see how he’s fleecing them and using them against the entire bigfoot community. He’d dead set on making a mockery and sham out of the entire subject and all the researchers; he’s said this much many times on his shows, all you have to do is watch them.
    This latest DVD release of the after events from the alleged shooting, is only a ploy to keep up interest and the story alive. If the DVD ever gets into the hands of those who paid, then posted on a site like Youtube, all any of us will see is more fabrication. He built up the ‘Shooting Bigfoot’ film for a very long time saying that it was the best HD footage of a sasquatch ever, that we’ll believe in the creature after this if we didn’t before. What the few who saw the film got was a 3 second clip of some unknown creature, a blobsquatch more or less and it didn’t prove a damn thing. It doesn’t even look like the creature in the ‘tent video’!!!! He’s doing the same thing again now with this new DVD release and I truly feel sorry for anyone who is going to put out their hard earned money on this nonsense. He’s a parasite of the worst kind!

    1. You ask me why I am a few others believe. Well, we have some inside sources who insist this story is true (at least the part about killing the Bigfoot) and they had absolutely no reason whatsoever to lie about this.
      As far as what happened after the body was put on the truck (and I think it was) I have no idea. No idea who has it now, or if Rick has it or if anyone has it. That much is much less clear.
      Furthermore, I was extremely impressed with both the Tent Video and the Shooting Bigfoot still. If that’s a hoax, it’s one of the finest ever done.
      Also Rick had no control over what Minnow put out in that film. My Minnow source also told me that Morgan shot 3 minutes of HD video during the Tent Video event. Why none of this footage was used in the movie is a huge mystery.

      1. Robert, have you ever considered that some of your inside sources could be liars themselves, plants or just people wanting to promote a fraudulent story?
        After Morgan Matthews cryptic statements and mostly silence regarding POS and this film, I don’t have much respect for him either. To me, he’s only making matters worse with his lack of proper and succinct responses.
        And, how can you or anyone else explain how or why the creature in the tent video looks so different from the one in the SB film?
        While the tent video looks OK, it’s far from conclusive. All we see is a head and shoulders of the creature, shot with grainy cell phone video, through the opening of a tent. This so EASILY could be duplicated with $1000 budget. I know I could do it myself but I will not make the effort or even spend the $1000 to do it. If someone wants to send me $1000, I will do it! Sound like POS, RD? 😉
        I’m 100% positive it’s a man with a partial mask, prosthetics and a makeup job.

        1. It cannot possibly be a man because the proportions are all wrong. That is an anatomically correct Bigfoot. It is not possible for a man in a suit to portray an anatomically correct Bigfoot because the proportions of the human and Bigfoot bodies are completely different. It would be like putting a man in a tiger suit and having him run around pretending to be a tiger.
          I can’t go into details, but there are some things in the Tent Video that no hoaxer ever gets right. In fact, they never even try to replicate these things. So when I see certain features, I know it has to be a Bigfoot.
          The Tent Video could possibly be CGI, I would agree with that, but it’s no man in a suit.
          My original source was a woman who worked at Minnow Films. I confirmed that she works there, and I really do not believe she is lying to me.

        2. Someone on the BFF Forum stated some time ago that when the tent VID FIRST hit the internet…. for a very brief time (hours..not days)…there was a shot of someone holding up a head prop in this tent vid. This individual swore over an over he saw this particular video and then it was removed.

        3. We have enough good videos and photos of these things that we believe are real, and they share common features, features that are typically NEVER present in any hoax, either because the hoaxers are not aware of Bigfoot anatomy and how it differs from human or because, due to the anatomical differences, it is impossible to put a man in a suit and represent a proper Bigfoot. In a few cases, the hoaxers do not even try to replicate certain features, though I believe they could if they tried.
          This is one of the ways that we can tell a real video or photo from a fake.

  14. let me state from the outset that i am on a stone cold whiskey bender.
    that said, i also want to state that i have the utmost respect for r-linz’s (hip-hop name) relentless optimism and truth-radar in reporting on a field notorious for scammery and untruths.
    now, all that aside, i wouldn’t give this cock dwyer a wooden nickel for anything he’s peddling. he reminds me of that original 11 project guy, ed smith or whatever the hell — constantly casting and reeling in believers with a decent story.
    i guarantee this — it would take very little to hoax the online bf community if this is all it takes. musky allen’s got a better chance of getting buttfucked by a BF than seeing one.

  15. This big foot is a big fucking lie. This man is trying to cheat us on multiple evidences and all traces of bigfoot element is not without any ambiguity. Those who with a sane mind can easily interpret after readin the below specified link that bifoot i a big hoax
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/strange-creatures/bigfoot2.htm
    this proves clearly that there is no bigfoot and all that is happening is fake identity crisis between those what they perceive as bigfoot and what in reality is a large bear. Get a life scumbags!!!

  16. “It cannot possibly be a man because the proportions are all wrong. That is an anatomically correct Bigfoot. I can’t go into details, but there are some things in the Tent Video that no hoaxer ever gets right. In fact, they never even try to replicate these things. So when I see certain features, I know it has to be a Bigfoot.” ~Robert Lindsay
    Robert, PLEASE explain this further. What can you possible see in the tent video that depicts an “anatomically” correct bigfoot? Why are you reluctant to explain in more detail? The brow ridge, the conical head, even though that doesn’t exist in this clip…what exactly?
    “The Tent Video could possibly be CGI, I would agree with that, but it’s no man in a suit.” ~Robert Lindsay
    That’s where we differ completely. I don’t see this as CGI at all and too high tech for POS and ‘investors’. He’s gone the simplest route and that is a man in some type of costume. I could SO EASILY re-create the tent video, but again, I’m not that foolish and it would take about $1000 that I’m not willing to spend. Any money spent on rebuking any of Dyer’s claims is gold to him and a slap in the face to any credible and true researchers. POS often remarks about this too…how so many people spend so much time and effort creating videos and ‘responses’ to him.
    “My original source was a woman who worked at Minnow Films. I confirmed that she works there, and I really do not believe she is lying to me.” ~ Robert Lindsay
    I believe you and maybe you did speak to a legitimate person working for Minnow Films, but it still doesn’t make the story anymore true. To me, she is simply doing her job and that is, to promote the SB film and Morgan Matthews.

    1. Yes it is possible that woman was lying to promote the movie for Minnow. I will grant you that.
      There should be a Facebook Find Bigfoot video out there that details how this is an anatomically correct Bigfoot and how the hoaxers cannot seem to recreate that. There is some other stuff too, but I can’t talk about it because I do not want to give hoaxers anymore ammo. Every time we give hoaxers information about a real BF looks like, they make their hoaxes better and better. It is basically an arms race. It is hard enough to tell the hoaxes from the real thing anymore anyway, and there is no reason to help them even more.
      If you want to email me, maybe we can talk.

      1. I have zero faith in FB/FB and I believe they have lost all of their credibility since so vehemently promoting POS’s claims. Even besides their undying willingness to believe POS’s 2012 claims, I always found their assessments to be outlandish, highly speculative and completely uncertain. Those guys seem to think EVERYTHING in photos & videos depicts a hidden or stealthy sasquatch. Every shadow seems to have a camouflaged bigfoot in it…..
        I haven’t looked around your site very much besides these bigfoot blogs, I supposed I can find your email link here somewhere?

        1. nevermind, I see it now…under contacts. I will contact you tomorrow then and so you can give more details about the details you say can’t be faked.

      2. Remeber the Photo of the TT member that coincidentally looked a lot like the BF in Tent Video?…… What are the odds of that?

  17. I firmly believe that many people in the bigfoot community are so extremely anxious to have sasquatch labeled as ‘real’ by the scientific community, that they lose their focus on what might be real versus what couldn’t be. Then entire subject has always been one of ridicule, fantasy and pseudo-science. Those of us who’ve believed and maintained that the creature is out there existing, (according to the majority) is simply grasping at straws and clinging to anyone who makes such outlandish claims like, POS. Let’s face it, we ALL want to know the truth and we all want this mystery solved once and for all!. But in saying this, we MUST realize that we just can’t hitch our trailers up to any truck that comes along.
    This is a huge pitfall that exists in the bigfoot community, the overzealous NEED to be redeemed and legitimized by our friends, family and social peers. We are tired of being ostracized, labeled as “freaks”, “crazy” or the “lunatic fringe of society” and it clouds the judgement of many sane people.
    When someone like POS (RD) comes along with such outlandish, insane, impossible yet semi-PLAUSIBLE claims, some still want to believe so much that they are willing to throw all logic out the window and to validate themselves and their beliefs. We’ve all done it and felt that way at different times and in different circumstances.
    I firmly believe that the creature exists, most definitely and I’m only an armchair researcher, enthusiast but ardent promoter of the creature’s existence for over 30 years. But, in today’s world of hoaxing either through clever CGI, costumes or unscrupulous people lying, we all have to unfortunately be a lot more skeptical. Just as Robert Lindsay mentioned, hoaxers only get better all the time and by closely monitoring what other legitimate people have observed about the creature, only to enhance their own fallacious claims.
    Please everyone, keep these things in your mind uppermost and don’t let your desire to have closure and validation about the subject, to allow you to fall ‘VICTIM” and yes, that’s victim to anyone like POS DYER!.
    Robert, I’m going to email you tomorrow about these discussions.

    1. Well said Al! I am right with you on this and yes, they certainly do exist. when the proof is finally presented, it will be an amazing event in our history that will change our perspective and outlook on what we believe about the world around us. (might sound a bit meladramatic but I believe this is likely). We really do not want people like POS involved in this discovery at all.

      1. “We really do not want people like POS involved in this discovery at all.”
        Brilliant, let’s rewrite history to fit our thoughts and desires. Are you proposing finding Hank and destroying the body and silencing the scientific community?
        http://youtu.be/mQrOfSxTG7U

        1. What?……of course not. POS doesn’t have a real BF. Hank is not REAL! And I guess what I meant to say was “We can be thankful that POS doesn’t have real BF evidence, body or film, as we really don’t need his type representing the BF Community or having significant involvement”. The BF subject needs to be taken seriously and it is most helpful to have respectable individuals involved.

      2. Well…. Where would I start? I think you’ve followed RL posts? If so, a lot of the info is in and around there and other similar sites. Ketchum had the real deal but wasn’t well received by the scientific and academia world. She may have also turned a lot of people against her with her less than scrupulouse ways. But the basic proof is there. It apparently didn’t help her study by making the interpretation that female HS bred with unknown male hominin 10 – 15k years ago IMO. That is what I gather.
        I hope Dr. Sykes is able to bring the truth to the scientific community in a manner they can accept.

  18. AH HAA HAA HA! Now he’s selling an autopsy video? Omg, I just peed. So let me get this straight. You won’t take my money…and I’ve done some research…you wouldn’t take another guys money, you won’t take Spikes money…you couldn’t sell 100 DVDs of your Hank video and now for only 99$ I can buy an autopsy video? Wow…I don’t even know what to say. Talk to me Mr Lindsay…..now what? So…the so called “Investors” allow Mr. Dyer to release 100 videos of Hank…but only if all 100 sell..but before they do, let’s release an autopsy video….and they’re only $99?????? Wow…

  19. Yep, count me in. Amma buy one of them there Hank videos, and one of them there autopsy videos. When are we gonna say enough is enough? December? He “Shot it” in September 2012… Let’s be real here. All offers aside, all bla bla bla….I’m going to start fresh. It’s September, 2012. I shoot a bigfoot. Why do I need “Investors”?… I just killed the most elusive creature on the planet. Oh, and by the way a film crew from minnow films saw the whole thing! Butttttt! My video wasn’t shot by them…. I hired another film crew…for $20,000.00 after they left. I had the refer truck for 7 days…no, I mean 35 or 40 days….let’s see….you are on a trip to Florida….now remember…you’re just on a trip….you didn’t just kill the most amazing creature science has ever seen….I’m pretty sure if I asked you how many days you rented a car you wouldn’t say “It was either 7 or 45 days…” See…I’m not trying to bring bad news to those who don’t want to hear it…I’m just saying “Forget about this guy.” I beg of you. I’m a believer…ridicule me for that…whatever….I have an open mind. However…don’t tell me you can walk on water unless I watch you walk on water with my own eyes….I want to go out there and make sure it’s no trick. If you’re reading this, you feel the same way…Sell 100 videos before we ship even 1… What? Even better, each DVD is encrypted so if you copy it and post it we’ll know who you are! Really? That’s incredible! I bet the big studios would love to have that technology! They don’t but Rick Dyer Does! Amazing!

  20. BTW Mr Lindsay, you can’t say that the tent video is an Actual Bigfoot. This is your opinion and nothing more. I respect you but I respect you as a journalist as do all who read your blog. As a journalist you must be subjective. As hard as it is, you must see both sides of the story unless one side has “ABSOLUTE PROOF”…. until we see a body, the tent video is nothing more than “Another grainy video.”

    1. No, I do not need to be objective at all. Anyway, I think I am being objective. And if you think journalists are generally objective, you have to be kidding.
      Almost 100% of journalists writing on this topic state emphatically that there is no such thing as Bigfoot. And that ain’t subjective?
      You are right. It is my opinion that the Tent Video is a real Bigfoot. There is not yet any good, hard scientific proof that that is a real BF in that movie. On the other hand, there is not yet any good, hard scientific proof that these things exist at all.
      Why are you not calling out the 95% of other blogger-journalists as subjective when they insist that the Tent Video is an obvious hoax.
      Serious double standard here.

Leave a Reply to Joerg Hensiek Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)