Feminist X writes:
RL: 90-95 Do you have evidence of this? Seems to me that all normal hetero men absolutely reject any form of partnering with children. A desperate hetero male would use a 9 yr old as a substitute for the adult female partner he preferred? Really? I would think that anyone who partners with a 9 yr old has desire for children and therefore is a pedophile. Sure, they may also like adults or even like adult women more, but if you are getting it up for a 9 yr old, you are a pedophile in my book.
It depends on how we define pedophile. In my opinion, the DSM definition is garbage and needs to be tossed. A pedophile is one who is sexually fixated on children. He primarily or exclusively gets off to kids and has little to no reaction to mature persons. As far as the 90-95 Pedophiles like kids. They don’t like matures or adults. Period. That’s the only definition that makes sense to me. I hate to sound like a man-hating gender feminist, but I know my gender very well. Men will screw anything. A woman, a teenage girl, a little girl, an old lady, a man, a teenage boy, maybe even a little boy if he’s twisted enough. If it’s got a hole, a guy will try to stick his dick in it, period. Sure, most men prefer a mature female, but a lot of them will pretty much screw anything, especially if it’s female. The non-pedophilic men who molest children are not some psychological species called pedophiles. They are just criminals! We have to stop using psychological disorders to label criminals. There is a tendency in the DSM to try to say that every criminal has a psychiatric disorder. This crazy. Crazy is one thing, bad and crooked is another. Leave it up to the law to delineate the varieties of criminals and keep the psychiatrists out of it. Pedophilia is a psychological disorder. It’s just not normal to be only turned on by kids and not turned on at all by matures or adults. If you are, there is something wrong with your head. Pedophiles are not necessarily criminals. There are pedophiles who do not molest children for long periods of time, possibly forever. A pedophile is only a criminal when he breaks the law. His sexual orientation is not a crime. Child molestation is a crime. Some people who do this have a psychological disorder called pedophilia and most do not. Most of them are just criminals. They aren’t crazy at all. They are simply people who don’t care much about other people and take advantage of vulnerable people in order to use them sexually. They are sexual opportunists.
3
20
20
20
I saw that you wrote this post in the morning, but I thought it best not to comment on such a topic from work.
I don’t really think people who commit child molestation should be treated differently by the law if they are pedophiles or not. It seems that child molesters of female children are not merely opportunistic in the way that a guy with a farm animal is opportunistic. Meaning, they are not just looking for any kind of hole. They seem to have some particular desire to degrade females/
Yeah, in 97% of the cases, Young people look the best.
Yes i agree with this opinion too, my friend 😉
what do you think the age of consent should be? I think it should be 16 or even 15 or 14
Nobody needs to be having sex at 14. In fact, the teen years should be exclusively dedicated to studies.
14 year old girls should not even be allowed alone with boys or young man – at all. Parents should be chaperoning everything.
a lot of teenagers start sex at that age and earlier. i see you have conservative traditional values
If they are starting sex at that age and earlier, its because their parents are letting them.
Besides, don’t know where you are from, but here in the States MOST 14 year olds are not having sex and a significant number of college students are graduating as virgins.
There seems to be a hysteria that “everyone is doing it” but in fact, not everyone is.
18 and 13
19 and 14
20 and 14
21 and 14
22 and 15
23 and 15
24 and 15
25 and 16
26 and 17
What are those numbers?
My ideal age of consent laws.
Doesn’t make sense then. How could age of consent be both 18 and 13 at the same time?
First figure is the older person, second is the younger person.
So 18 male, 13 female, etc.
Then it really REALLY doesn’t make sense as age of consent is one age for both. And male partners are not always older, and generally not for first time experiences. And 13 years old is way too young for anyone to be having sex, much less with an 18 year old.
Complete fail.
My figures would be:
under 17 – 14
under 18 – 15
under 19 – 16
19 and up – 17