The Whites of Asia

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URqN0Iu64D4] South Asia and Central Asia, to be precise. Most of the people in this video are children, and the real Mighty Whitey types claim that these folks are not really White because kids are naturally paedomorphic in terms of skin, hair and eye color. What that means is that kids can have blond hair, light skin and maybe even light eyes that darken later on with age. I don’t particularly care about that. All I know is these are my people! I was particularly interested to see very White looking people even India, probably the darkest country in the video. The video is correct. These people are indeed the true Aryans. Germans Nazis are morons. Nordics are not Aryans. Nordics are Nordics. Aryans are Aryans. Their homeland is in northern Kazakhstan 4,500 years ago. Then they moved down into Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and Iran, leaving their languages and genes behind. On a closing note, I must say that these kids are so beautiful! I love their eyes especially – they have such beautiful eyes!

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

55 thoughts on “The Whites of Asia”

  1. This video is sort of famous in WNist / HBD circles kinda like all those pics of the Pathans , Nuristanis and Kalash (always the same people) that people post all over HBD forums.
    If we are talking Pakistan/India and the nearby area, then the pics / people in the video are highly selected out of the general pop, the video creator has sought kids who have blue eyes , and many of those pics are the exact same pics that pop up in a google search and are spammed all over HBD forums.
    In google pics search those with Europid type phenotype show up as the 1st results because thats what everyone clicks on . Also tourists or people from the region took pics of europid/pseudo-europid people because they stand out .
    I lived in the Gulf, so have seen many Pathans, Pakistanis , Indians etc.. 99% did not not have blue eyes or blonde/light hair. When you look at news photos of crowds, towns, protests etc from various regions of Pakistan, they don’t look like the phenotype being pushed in the video.
    There have been umpteen invasions/conquests of the northern SubCon, starting with Indo-Iranians in the 1st half of the 2nd millenium BC, followed by Persians,Greeks, Scythians,Arabs,Turko-Mongols,Euros,Russians and lord knows who else.
    The video is misleading in regards to the Swastika, giving the impression that the symbol was created by Aryans. The name is Sanskrit but the symbol can not be credited to Aryans or Proto-Indo Europeans. It is such an ancient symbol that the origin is unknown and indeed it can’t be even said that 1 cultured invented it. It is found in the Indus Civlization, ancient Mesopotamia ,Elamite civilization,Amerindian culture.
    It is a rudmentary symbol that different cultures could have independently come up with it. One theory is that it is the patten individual plant fiber strips make in woven baskets.
    WNist are indeed rather stupid to call themselves Aryans, it comes from not knowing history/anthopology and blind faith in uncle Adolf . There are a tiny few who are not this ignorant .

    1. From my own experience in Dubai it seems that most of the Iranians I’ve met had ‘middle eastern’ features that were neither Arab nor Indian. The second largest group among them looked very Indian while a very small segment looked completely European. This is based on the sample I’ve observed in Dubai for 10 years. Bear in mind that I have never actually been to Iran like my dad has, but from many of the rallies I’ve seen online it seems that a large number of them look completely Indian (but lighter). Historic accounts (Abbasid dynasty) also suggest that Iranians (Persians that is) were a pale brown people and were not ‘excessively fair’ like the Slavs. Robert has seen a picture of me and says that I look white, but in reality I’m definitely not white, just a pale brown (at least in winter).
      I suspect Iranians like to identify as white simply because the west remains dominant today. Historically however, the Persians maintained a distinct identity from the west and liked it that way. As Sandra Mckay points out, this is why Hellinization was such a failure in Iran. Iran’s culture also possesses the introverted nature of Indian culture, which is apparent from their artwork and poetry. The Persian culture and identity is in a class of its own.

      1. I have more or less the same expereince from my time in Abu Dhabi (15+ years). Many Iranians of the small statured swarthy looking phenotype own shops in the malls and souks.

      2. “Robert has seen a picture of me and says that I look white, but in reality I’m definitely not white, just a pale brown (at least in winter). ”
        He obviously meant “white” in the sense of European Caucasoid not literally white skinned. He’s saying you could pass for some kind of Euro. That’s why discussians about whiteness and who’s white are near impossible. The definintion of white varies throughout the world. I’ve noticed Middle Easterners and South Asians often use the term to denote literal skin color. In the Western world it usually denotes European or Caucasians in general. It makes for frustrating conversations.
        In regard to the topic. I believe that Turks, Levatine Arabs, Northern Semites, Caucasus Mtn. folk and Northern Persians are the “whites” of Asia. “White” looking Kalash, Pushtuns, Punjabis etc. are just outliers of those groups, like exceptionally dark Europeans are outliers.

        1. When I lived in the Emirates, White always denoted someone of European ethnicity. It was not used to identiy Levantines, Berbers, Persians.
          When people said White, one thought of: Brits, Germans, Swiss, Swedes, Aussies, Euro-Americans, French etc..

    2. Pathans and especially Nuristanis have lighter eyes and hair. But yes, exceptions, not the norm. I think most Iranians look Italian. They also go heavy with the hair gel.

  2. I saw a guy working in a take away with striking green eyes similar to the ones in the video. He was darker skinned than the kids in the video though. My kashmiri friend said that the guy was Kashmiri and you get people in Kashmir with eyes like that.

      1. there was or is a community in the Appalachians. Blue eyes, caucasian features and really dark skin. They are a mystery.

        1. Steve
          That was dispelled by genetic testing. They’ve been discovered to have European, African, and Amerindian ancestry, but nothing exotic like Indian or Turkish as they had come to assume. I the myth was originally conceived because they wanted to avoid detection. Lincoln was supposedly part Melungeon.

  3. Interesting. I’ve always been one of those “if they look white, they’re white” types of people. Unlike most white nationalists, I’ve never really been into blood purity or any other nonsense like that.
    The way I see it, if you’re worried about declining white numbers, it’s foolish to further limit the potential size of your group by being so exclusive.
    Besides, there might be a good reason to adopt my stance in this regard. Because according to geneticist Razib Khan, whites (at least Northern euros/nordics) are on average 10% Northeast Asian
    I’ve always known that Eastern Euros had Asian ancestry, but what do you make of this?

    1. I’ve been to Razib Khan’s blog before and most of his material is way beyond me.
      The way I see it, if you’re worried about declining white numbers, it’s foolish to further limit the potential size of your group by being so exclusive.
      But I disagree with you BAG. As Lincoln once said, calling the tail of a donkey a leg won’t make it so. Calling Afghans/Iranians/Indians white will not make them so. The White identity isn’t just about genetics, it’s also about language, culture, values, and heritage. European values and worldviews have shaped North America and that’s how it should remain. Including central and some south Asians into the white identity will not solve your problem. By all means recruit these people into the pro white camp but by extending the white label to them you are diluting your cultural identity. Doesn’t seem right to me.

      1. Well, I wouldn’t call Iranians as a whole white.
        However, for members of those groups who look white and identify as white, they should be welcome.

      2. Besides, Europeans couldn’t even get along with each other as fellow Whites, so I don’t see them accepting some Near Easterners and South Asians. Lots of Pakistanis and Sikh Punjabis in the UK, and they have always complained about racism. These South Asians aren’t from the lowest rungs of the ladder in South Asia either. I lived in England for a short time so familiar with their look.
        Heck Western Euros sneer at Eastern Euros and look down on the swarthy Med Euros, so fat chance they will embrace non Euros no matter how White they look. You only have to look at European colonialism in South Asia and the Near East to see how Europeans have historically viewed themselves and others.
        Forums like Skadi (defunct as of late) was a Germanic culture forum and was accused of Nordicism and anti Slavic prejudice. Americans are less concerned about various European ethnics , whether you are from North Western Europe or Southern Europe or Eastern Europe because America has been a White melting pot. Europeans on the other hand are well aware of their unique identities.

      3. “The White identity isn’t just about genetics, it’s also about language, culture, values, and heritage. European values and worldviews have shaped North America and that’s how it should remain.”
        Most Non-euro Caucasoids in the US assimilate sooner or later.
        At that point they’re both Caucasoid AND culturally as European/Western as the average European descended American. I’m with BAG on this.
        My step-mother was Lebanese-American and she was as “white” as any European-American.

      4. Dota,
        Don’t forget about IQ. 2 sigma higher IQ subsumes all below. 1 sigma creates recognizable hierarchy. You have a flatland view of things.

        1. “He reveres you, so this should be quite the blow.”
          He’s too smart for that. But sometimes he gives off the stink of the 100 IQ Anglo. That all men are made by God to be absolutely equal in every way,
          and it’s the Anglo role to enforce this belief.

        2. Hacienda
          That all men are made by God to be absolutely equal in every way,
          Equal in worth but not ability. But this is a very personal belief. Reality is that ability dictates hierarchy which dictates worth. Is ability the function of IQ? Hard to say. I know I’m mediocre but I long ago learned to draw solace from my mediocrity. We are the red and white blood cells. And that wraps up my ode to the invisible.
          “He’s too smart for that. ”
          I actually think you are one of the better commenters here and I think you do have a peculiar insight about things. If I had an older brother I’d want him to be a lot like you.

        3. Hacienda,
          “sometimes he gives off the stink of the 100 IQ Anglo. That all men are made by God to be absolutely equal in every way,
          and it’s the Anglo role to enforce this belief.”
          How come I have lived in England all my life, went to Christian schools, and never heard that God created all men absolutely equal in every way? If anglo Christian culture held that to be true, why did we have grammar schools for the smart kids? It seems to me that the attitude you highlighted is more characteristic of recent times (with things like the abolition of selective education) as Christianity has declined and pc fads have come in.
          It is like Dota said, equal in worth, equal in value, deserving of equal rights and equality under the law, equality before God’s judgement. We were never so naive as to think that all men were equal in every way.
          btw 100 is only the average. Lots of us are way smarter than the Chinese average. The average anglos aren’t the ones responsible for our science and philosophy.

        4. The joke is that Hacienda is a smart Asian who is also dumb, and that he is pretty much an iconic representation of the smart but dumb fat ethnocentric asian.

        5. I like Halucienda, despite his anti-White schtick. He’s just jealous of his superiors, that’s all that is. We see right through that stuff. But Halucienda is very smart, and he’s a fine writer. He’s almost poetic sometimes.
          I like Koreans, but mostly only Korean women. I don’t give a damn about the guys really. I don’t give a damn about any Asian guys. I only want their women.

        6. “anti-White schtick.”
          It’s not a schtick. I think eveyone feels whites are a very schizophrenic race. Including whites.

        7. “If I had an older brother I’d want him to be a lot like you.”
          Thanks Dota. I appreciate this.
          “Ordinary people are bright,
          I alone am muddled.
          Ordinary people are clever,
          I alone am dull.
          Ordinary people seem discriminating,
          I alone am muddled and uncouth.”
          – Tao Te Ching, aka the book that is destroying the Great Satan

        8. “How come I have lived in England all my life, went to Christian schools,”
          You’re thinking point point. I speaking as a general cultural vector that makes up the average Anglo.

        9. Halucienda’s more entertaining than anything else.
          He’s an East Asian who’s actually interesting as an individual, LOL.

        10. “Sweetie, we should have gotten together when I still had a full tank of fuel.”
          “My friends are gone and my hair is grey.
          I ache in the places where I used to play.
          And I’m crazy for love but I’m not coming on.”
          -Leonard Cohen.
          “she should have caught me in my prime. She would have stayed with me”.
          -Bob Dylan, a simple twist of fate.
          “You’re thinking point point. I speaking as a general cultural vector that makes up the average Anglo.”
          Okay fair enough. But I don’t think that the ‘all men made equal in every way’ attitude characterizes general anglo thinking or the thinking of the average man. People are perfectly aware that there are differences in intellect and ability.

        11. I love Norman, but I’m not amused by his childish antics. All I see in him is a sex doll. I could listen to Hacienda all day.

      5. If European values and worldview is what you care about, then as well as excluding whites that aren’t a part of this, why not include non-whites who are?

    2. “on average 10% Northeast Asian”
      That’s cool, if true. They’ve got that cold valuational mind. I like it.
      Note that polar distances- Siberia to Finland are actually much shorter than appears in Mercator map.

        1. Sure but haven’t they got some NE Asian genes to have eyes like that?There are ethnic groups along the north of Russia with eyes like that. Doesn’t it come from NE Asian admixture?

  4. They’re like the girl from the famous National Geographic cover ‘Girl with the green eyes’. I suspect these features are the legacy of the British empire, and the soldiers stationed in the near East.
    There are a lot of mixed race black/white people in my area and occasionally you see a very light skinned person with startling green eyes. It’s just down to the mixture of genes.

    1. Nah, the ‘those are only rape children’ crowd are wrong. It goes a lot further back, even before Hellenic Bactria.

  5. I have studied this subject in the past. And here is my input. If I could say there are native whites (European-looking) outside Europe, it would be the following people: Georgians, Tajiks-Pamiris-Yaghnobis, Nuristanis, Kalash, most Turks, most Kurds, most Azeris, most Armenians, most Kashmiris, most Lebanese, many Palestinians, many Mizrahi Jews, many Pashtuns, some Syrians, some Iraqis, some Berbers, some Persians & other ethnicities in Iran, few other South Asians, and few other Arabs. Native mixed-race whites outside Europe include Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Turkmens, Kyrgyzs, Uyghurs, Hazaras, many (especially northern) South Asians, some north Asians (like Siberian Tatars and Altaians), and few other Turkic groups in East Asia as well as a village or two in China.

  6. I’m trying to find the distinction between Azeris, Tajiks and Persians. What makes them different? I usually lumped them all together as Persians.

    1. Tajiks are Sogdians and Bactrians who were Persianized during the Islamic Golden era. Azeris in Azerbaijan are mostly descendants of the people of Caucasian Albania (same name but not same nation nor people as Balkans Albania) who were Turkicized by Turkic invaders. While Azeris from Iran are descendants of Persians and other Iranian peoples who were Turkicized by the same Turkic invaders.

  7. Odd. Every actual Nordic (and everyone who can read their newspapers) knows that the indigenous inhabitants of Scandinavia were the Saami. The Saami of today get free money & privileges FOR BEING ALIVE for this very reason. In fact, a Saami delegation visited Israel hoping to learn how to run adult schools for language revival. Apparently it helped some. There are Saami-language schools now. Paid for by Nordic taxpayers

Leave a Reply to Hacienda Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)