One Nation, Two (Jewish) Parties

We have two main political parties here in the US.
The (Jewish) Democratic Party
The (Jewish) Republican Party
This was made clear by the recent debacle at the Democratic Convention. This was the first convention at which the Democrats did not put in BS about Jersusalem being the capital of Israel. The Republicans, of course, put that in their platform. Romney heard that the Dems were slighting the beloved Jews, the Chosen People of the whole universe we all bow down before every day, and he went nuts, saying that Obama “threw Israel under the bus.” In addition, according to the Guardian, large Jewish donors were upset about the platform and were making noises about withholding money to the Democrats. Since Jewish money and Black votes are the lifeblood of the Democratic Party, withholding Jewish money is like withdrawing blood from a hemophiliac. Without Jewish money, the Democratic Party dies. It’s as simple as that.
So the Democrats put the language back in the platform as an amendment and called a vote on it. They held three votes, and it needed 2/3 to pass. Each time, they yeas were no greater than the nays. Nevertheless, Antonio Villaraigosa violated the rules by allowing the measure to pass even though it had been defeated. The Republicans then put on a big show about how embarrassing this had been for the Democrats and how the Democrats were the party of Israel-hating extremists. Many expressed outrage over the vote.
Nevertheless, the fake vote was necessary. If the Dems defeated the amendment, the Republicans would have run all over them with charges of being Israel-haters. That ought to be a compliment, but in US politics, its’ an insult. The Democrats need to win the election, and Jewish-filled Florida is a toss-up. Furthermore, the party needs Jewish money. You gotta do what you gotta do to win, even if it means delivering fake votes on a convention floor.
But it does indicate how Jewish money has corrupted both political parties here in the US. With the Republicans, it’s more of an ideological issue,a s they have an ideological interest in supporting Israel. With the Democrats, it’s a lot different. Support for the KKK Jews and their sick little hate state over in the Middle East ought to be antithetical to any progressive and antiracist political party with roots in the Civil Rights movement..

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

80 thoughts on “One Nation, Two (Jewish) Parties”

  1. It’s true. Both parties are run by Jews. The Jews win the election either way regardless of who they vote for.
    “Romney heard that the Dems were slighting the beloved Jews, the Chosen People of the whole universe we all bow down before every day, and he went nuts, saying that Obama ‘threw Israel under the bus.'”
    Yeah, Obama threw Israel under the bus yet he continued to send them billions of dollars every year.
    “Jewish-filled Florida is a toss-up.”
    It is a toss-up but Florida isn’t filled with Jews. Florida’s heaviest concentration of Jews is in South Florida where they mainly reside along the coastal areas and even there they still don’t make up a majority. Ultimately, Jewish money is more important than Jewish votes.

    1. Money is no.1 ofcourse, but the Jews in Florida really do show up and vote since most of them are old (big voting block, high turnout), organized politically and well, Jewish.

  2. This seems to happen every election where the candidates both engage in a contest of who can kiss Jewish ass the most. It’s truly remarkable that the presidential candidates compete in bending over backwards to pander to the interests of 2% while the other 98% remain invisible. How stupid can white people be? It’s almost impossible to even get whites to address Jewish power and this is getting to the point of becoming exasperating.

    1. @ Dota
      Yeah, as a white person, this aspect of my people exasperates me to no end.
      Although, I don’t know if whites are really stupid or blind, so much as they are cowards.
      As James Edwards would say, they would rather lose than be called bigots.

      1. A white friend of mine once asked me if I denied the holocaust. I truthfully told him that while I did not deny it, I did question the official death toll. I also told him not to take my word for it and research it himself. This was his response: “I don’t want to.” I ask: why? He said:”Because what if you’re right?” He was happy to be willfully ignorant but politically correct.
        There’s more wimpy whites per square foot in Canada than there are in any other place in the west.

        1. @ Dota
          I think the fundamental problem among white Westerners is a decline of courage. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, during his 1978 Harvard commencement speech, noted that a decline in courage was one of the most striking features that he noticed about the West. And it’s only gotten worse since then.
          It does indeed seem that whites are more interested in being tolerant and politically correct than actually seeking the truth.
          For example, since this post is about the Jewish Question, a while back I read an editorial in the LA Times by Joel Stein, talking about the dominance of Jews in Hollywood.
          He pointed out that the ADL released a survey, showing that only 22% (or something like that) of Americans now believed that Jews run Hollywood. The ADL triumphantly declared it progress against stereotyping (although there are still too many Americans with “anti-Semitic” beliefs for their taste).
          However, as Stein pointed out, it shows just how dumb Americans have gotten, since Jews “totally run Hollywood.”
          Well, I wouldn’t say dumb, so much as wimpy, particularly among the white American population. But judging from what you’ve said, white Canadians are even worse in this regard.

        2. BAG
          Yeah I had read that article myself a while ago. I’m not sure the problem is courage (or lack of) but rather an elementary sort of pavlovian/operant programming. The Jew media invents labels for various groups. “Racist” is one such label which = bad, tolerant = progressive and therefore = good. The media’s function is to mete out positive and negative reinforcement. It’s like watching Skinner rise from the grave.

      2. It’s nauseating. I can’t even watch the convention. you do have to give the white gentile elite their due blame, not as jewish pawns, but exploiters of their own people.

        1. It’s nauseating to see you constantly trying to deflect blame from your own people. They are indeed Jewish pawns brainwashed by a Jewish education system, media, and entertainment industry.

      3. Holocaust deniers are too preoccupied with the actual death toll, which is of minimal importance. They should make more of the events leading up to the holocaust in addition to the subsequent exploitation.

        1. You call it denial, I call it revisionism. About 20 years ago, the plaque at Auschwitz changed the death toll from 4 million to something like 1.1 million. That’s a pretty big difference. The exterminationists(those who promote the lie) now claim that the number is just symbolic. Jews just keep doing what they do best: lying. Plus, it’s already been proven that the Germans didn’t use gas chambers. Without the big lie, there would be no holohoax industry.

        2. None of that is true.
          The final figure does not take into account the Auschwitz deaths. It is based on population studies done after the war.
          The best figure is that 5.7 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust.
          Germans definitely used gas chambers.

        3. I don’t see how a 2-3 million difference really makes much of a difference. I have heard holocaust revisionists demand recognition and reparations for the Armenian genocide, in which less than 2 million were killed. You could say the Rothschilds funded Hitler. That would be a game changer.

        4. I do not deny holocaust. But my main question is why Holocaust begin only as late as 1942. Prior, Hitler just want to kick the Jews out or have them locked up in camps.
          And there are many questionable events in WW2.

  3. you know robert even telling the truth will get you labled an anti-semite in todays world. you know whats really funny tho, the palestinians are also a semitic people , but no one calls the israeli’s anti semites as they systematically wipe them out. funny world huh?

    1. Very funny indeed.
      Funnier than you can ever imagine.
      How funnily systematic are the those mighty Israelis anyway? How many years has the Fatliestinkian life expectancy dropped since the Jews took over from the Limeys? How negative has their population growth been? And how ’bout that crude death rate? How does it stack up against the world average, or even Israel’s average for that matter?

  4. Dear Robert
    Americans aren’t an ungenerous people. For instance, they give oodles of money to their churches, and American alumni are probably the most generous in the world. So why are gentile Americans so reluctant to give to political parties? Probably because they hate politicians. However, by not giving, they only increase the clout of people who do give. It is very foolish.
    The solution should be public financing of political parties, at least at the federal level. If a federal political party were to receive 5 dollars for every vote that it received in the previous presidential election, then the parties would become independent of donors. That’s only appropriate. After all, donors represent only themselves, while taxpayers are the whole country. Political parties are really public institutions, without which no democracy can function, so it is only fair and reasonable that they get their money from the public.
    To avoid abuse, there should be the restriction that only parties that received, say, at least 4% of the total votes cast for president can receive federal funding.
    Regards. James

  5. Iv’e also come to this conclusion. The Jews are a minuscule minority in America, yet we’ re subject to their whining and drama every political season. I ask myself how long it will be until people being to ask themselves how it can be that such a minuscule minority can carry so much weight.
    But to ask such a question is tantamount to denying the holocaust…so i doubt this question will be raised any time soon.

  6. @james smith, Iv’e always found that line of arguing pretty facetious. We all know that anti-Semitic refers to jews, not Arabs, so what point are you trying to make, given that you’re being facetious. Is it a clever wordplay? OK, it’s not funny.

    1. There is nothing wrong with what he said. Arabs are far more Semitic than Jews are yet the tribe has hijacked the word. The old definition of antisemitism used to include Arabs as well. In my old tattered copy of the Oxford dictionary the term included Arabs as well. Not anymore it seems:
      http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/anti-Semitism?q=antisemitism
      Meanings can shift definitions and meanings themselves evolve through usage. Since the Tribe controls the media they have the power to shape the meanings of certain words and hence are able to hijack certain words.

    2. Antisemitic, refers to the people in the bloodline of Sem, the older son of Noah. And their beginnings was in the middle east. So Arabs are included as Semites before the Jewish hijacked the term.

        1. It was coined by a non jew, who was attempting to make it more socially acceptable.
          Arabs have the term “anti arabism,” they don’t need another term.

  7. Jews are Skilled people and Merchants who became Intellectuals, scholars, etc. Brahmins are Spiritual, intellectual people who have become Merchants[ Engineers, Doctors] for survival sake. I am sure Our Gods wont forsake True Brahmins.
    It is my hunch that I can survive by sucking upto a “Jew” better than sucking upto a Gentile in the difficult times. I just dont know how it works. Maybe I am wrong.
    I know the savage naturee of Muslims that has haunted India. But, I dont know brow-beating Palestinians the way Israel does is right, atlest what we see on TV. Maybe thet are as bad as Pakis and Bangladeshis, and afghans

  8. Lindsay
    You’re so lucky to have Dota around. He even tells you what you believe so you don’t have to form your own opinions.

  9. I think I want to get to the root of the cause here; why is it that Muslims have never been successful as the Jews? What exactly makes Jews as a group so successful and powerful? Is the fact that the Jews are a minority, play any role in this?

    1. You could say that Christians are more successful as a group as well, but you wouldn’t know that by looking at Sub-Saharan Africa. Muslims are too heterogeneous a group to be compared to the tribe. You should compare Jews to Brahmins or Parsis for a more fair comparison.

        1. overseas Chinese where exactly? Because I don’t see any overseas Chinese that are “successful” in places such as the Middle East or the West. In the West, the Chinese are socially ostracized.

        2. Ah yes, Xera, Warrior Princess! Again you show your superior knowledge of 1850’s data and ignorance of the present. For 2010, the U.S. Census shows 51.8% of Chinese Americans have at least a bachelor’s degree and 26.6% possess an advanced degree. Why? Because the Arabs have taken all the jobs as taxi cab drivers and convenience store operators. If you learn to read the hard data, perhaps they will promote you to head cashier.
          Or do you consider the US not to be part of the West.

      1. Dota,
        In Nigeria, you can make the same comparison between the Christian Igbo and the rest of the population, although there are certainly other factors at play, given that the Christian Yoruba are relatively less successful.

  10. No, the term antisemitism has traditionally referred to hatred of Jewish people. I don’t care that you are clever enough to realist that semite also describes Arabs, because the word was never coined for the purpose.
    While you’re at it, why not claim that the word elephant also refers to ants because it contains the word Ant.
    Now you are all correct that jews disproportionately influence American politics, but they also disproportionately influence Computer science and mathematics, so it’s not as if this is unique. What we are dealing with here is a cohort of people who have a very high IQ. That’s it. No conspiracies or under the table Rothschild dealings are going on here.

    1. I am a Singaporean Chinese. Chinese has certain wicked traits that they hate to admit. Chinese society is always plague by over politiking. In Chinese or all East Asian society, all salient individuals are shunned.
      Reverence are given to those with power, money or to the old man. In Chinese society, those who rise to the top are often the most noxious character, but they are definitely good in personal skills. (playing politics)
      In academia, even though Chinese are clever, however, their most salient members have been decimated by the cultural process. And in Chinese society, students mostly studied to make monies. In our culture, those with monies has the loudest voice. The rest are just bunch of clowns never mind they invented something or they have discovered interesting ideas.
      That is the primary reason why Chinese are unable to shine compared to Jews.

    2. Thank you Mindy.
      “I don’t care that you are clever enough to realist that semite also describes Arabs,”
      Indeed.
      Antisemitism never referred to hatred of Arabs. I don’t even know why they would want to be included in that definition as they believe the term “semitic” refers to linguistics not genetics. They already have anti arabism and islamophobia.

    3. No, the term anti-Semitism has traditionally referred to hatred of Jewish people. I don’t care that you are clever enough to realist that Semite also describes Arabs, because the word was never coined for the purpose.
      I have looked at older dictionaries and I have seen it include Arabs as well. All Semites. Your elephant analogy was stupid, so try harder. Elephants and ants are seperate species of animals whereas Arabs and Jews are both semites.
      “”Now you are all correct that jews disproportionately influence American politics, but they also disproportionately influence Computer science and mathematics, so it’s not as if this is unique.””
      Nice try Jewbag. Their over representation in Math and Computer science is a product of their talents playing out. Like the Indian Patels dominating the hospitality sector or Italians in construction. Jewish over representation in the media, politics, and academia however is not a coincidence or a naturally occurring phenomena like you would have us believe, but a direct, carefully orchestrated, and organized attempt at spreading their corrosive influence in society to meet some very tangible goals. You’re not fooling anyone here. So much for famed Ashkenazi verbal IQ.

      1. @ Dota
        What bothers me the most about the growth of Jewish power is actually the fact that it’s NOT a conspiracy. In fact, more often than not, it’s very much out in the open and even in your face.
        And yet hardly anyone has the courage to call them out, despite the fact that their disproportionate influence is obvious to anyone even half informed.
        Again, it’s the cowardice.

        1. I disagree BAG, I believe it is a conspiracy, and I’m not talking about the Illuminati and secret handshakes and all. I can totally see certain groups being over represented in certain fields given their natural apptitudes, heck I come from a castiest culture so I understand this clearly (the peasants farm, the traders trade ect). However there is a concerted effort by Jews to dominate every sphere from where influence can be exerted.
          Don’t fall for GSG’s bogus self deprecation or strawmans. There is also a concerted effort in undermining the cultural values of the majority. Here in Canada it was the Canadian Jewish Congress that was instrumental in removing the Lord’s prayer from public schools. They used the phony anti white Hate crimes legislation against Proff Lubomyr Prytulak when he blew the whistle on Kosher labelling and illegal Israeli organ smuggling. They shut down his website: http://www.ukar.org. Visit the website now and see what’s on there.
          You keep mentioning courage so I ask you whether you have the courage to call a spade a spade.
          In fact, more often than not, it’s very much out in the open and even in your face.
          Only to people like you BAG, who happen to be well read and aware.

        2. I can always count on you to respond to allude to my posts, even when noone else does. You could benefit from self deprecation and humility, it could make you more likeable, though I doubt you have what it takes.

        3. “If I did”
          I usually try to avoid arranging dares, as they often end in violence or other unanticipated results but since this is an anonymous forum, and though you put on bold airs OL, I doubt you walk the walk IRL, WHY THE HELL NOT?

        4. Dota,
          Don’t you think there are enough intelligent, well-read people out there that know what’s going on but just don’t act?
          This is probably not a fair comparison, but the average person doesn’t know enough about or care about global warming, yet the few that do protest, boycott, etc. Why aren’t those aware of the “Jewish conspiracy” doing the same? Political correctness, maybe?
          This is not to say that I don’t agree with you. I think it’s more complicated than cowardice. The fact that Jews looks so white and behave accordingly is a big factor.
          It’s not Jews that run Hollywood, it’s “white” people.

        5. “Again, it’s the cowardice.”
          Maybe it’s just the spirit of Anglo-Saxon “fairplay”. Jews > WASPs in straight up competition. WASPs have always been in awe of Jews. Newton thought Jews were the shit.

        6. @ Car Guy
          You raise a good point.
          As I once pointed out during a discussion with Ishmael, there’s a difference between ethnic minorities and visible racial minorities.
          The former can assimilate and blend in without too much trouble, whereas the latter will always be outsiders to an extent.
          (obviously, this is more true in the West than elsewhere, as ethnic Koreans and other East Asian minorities in countries like Japan continue to face marginalization, despite being mostly similar in phenotype)
          Since Jews are an ethnic minority in the U.S, they don’t arouse the resentment of the white masses as much.
          However, if Asians (like Jews, a small and highly educated segment of the American population), a racial minority, were to dominate Hollywood, the media, congress, etc, to the extent that Jews do, I don’t think the white masses would ever stand for it. They wouldn’t be able to blend in or give themselves names like “Stewart” in order to pass themselves off as just regular white people.
          (though some Chinese Americans have anglicized their names. Take Gary Locke, for example)
          Even if American Ashkenazi Jews, for the most part, may not identify as white, they can still blend in with the white population.

        7. @ Hacienda
          Yeah, that probably plays a big factor as well.
          Jews just seem to have an aggressive, competitive, and tribal edge. Joe Sobran once described it as a “furtive racial superpatriotism.”

        8. Jewish entertainers often integrate their ethnic backgound and “otherness” into their work, so they aren’t exactly trying to hide it, but your point about blending in still holds true, though despite what Dota claims, only a small minority of jews hold firm to ALL of the core tenets, but most have split to form multiple factions and subdivisions that are often mutually hostile to one another (John Derbyshire acknowledges this.) How do non Asian students at Irvine feel about the Asian majority?
          Gay Area Guy
          Why are you so concerned about minority rights in India?

        9. “Joe Sobran once described it as a “furtive racial superpatriotism.” ”
          Sobran was a plagiarist, and his boss Buckley was a Catholic liar.
          Jews cheat. But I’d like to see the evidence they cheat more than WASPs.

        10. @ GSG
          I don’t know how exactly I’ve come across as some advocate for Dalits in India. Pointing out the shittiness of Indian culture doesn’t make me a crusader for Dalits.
          Re: Non-Asian attitudes towards Asians at UCI
          It really depends. I knew some white people who resented it, and even flat-out said that once they graduated, they wouldn’t miss all the Asians. I knew one extremely racist white guy (he makes me look like Tim Wise) who never missed an opportunity to make disparaging remarks about Asians.
          (then again, he hated all other non-white races, but he seemed to single out Asians in particular)
          For others, it was often a humorous subject matter, including discussions of yellow fever.
          One of my desi friends (the same Bangladeshi guy who went on the “glorious India” rants) remarked that his problem with Asians was that they just seemed to have sticks up their asses.
          At least for me, I had a lot of Asian friends and got along with them just fine. But if I had to do it all over again, I would have gone to a less Asian university.
          Too many Asians makes for a boring and stagnant place.

        11. @ Hacienda
          Where’s your evidence that he was a plagiarist?
          Besides, that doesn’t necessarily detract from his opinions.
          You could just as easily make the same argument about MLK .

        12. “Where’s your evidence that he was a plagiarist?”
          He admitted to it. This was before he was fired by Buckley for other reasons.
          What argument? You didn’t attribute any argument to Sobran. In fact, Sobran himself was a shit arguer of things himself, as was Buckley. Catholics can’t argue for shit, anyway.
          What evidence do you have that Jews cheat more than WASPs? I ask again.

        13. Well I’m one of those guys that is never hesitant about making “disparaging” remarks about Asians though. The thing is that it’s unfair comparing Asians to Jews; since bottom of the barrel white wannabe delusional master race thinking Asians with small peckers, will ever dominate or even reach any goddamn higher tier position in Western/Caucasian society. We have Jews, Syrians, the Maronites and my Levantine buddies with their cocks getting sucked by the superior white wannabe Asian master race by the hour as I speak. Chiggers being in the same position as Jews ROFL!!!!!! What a joke, only in a fantasy land can that ever happen.

        14. I believe that Sobran was fired because of his increasingly anti-Israel articles, at a time when National Review was beginning to descend into neoconservatism.

        15. “It’s not Jews that run Hollywood, it’s “white” people.”
          Not true. Just not true. They controlled Hollywood since it was founded. Just because the celebrities have aryan features doesn’t mean Jews don’t control it. After cornering the tailoring industry when they came from Eastern Europe, and subsequently monopolizing diamond/jewelery/gold trading, they expanded into the media and entertainment industry in America.
          Other examples could be self made men like Sam Zemurray who was responsible for the growth of the Banana Republics in Central America.
          They are just crafty people. High IQ + centuries of oppression and forced isolation caused them to dominate certain industries and gave them a head start (successful minorities control a certain industry or trade See Viet Nail salons). Usury was the Jewish profession, since it was a sin in Christianity. And lack of land ownership caused Jews to control “mobile” industries with physical value, like gold. When the world transitioned to a capitalist system, Jews had necessary contacts and skills to quickly take over.

        16. I never denied that the entertainment industry was always heavily jewish. It does contradict claims about antisemitism at the turn of the century, or in some cases, justify the reactions of protestant elite, but at the same time, negates their claim that Jews initially seized control of EI to debase the morality of America, because the EI only began its downward spiral after the 1960’s.

        17. “I believe that Sobran was fired because of his increasingly anti-Israel articles, at a time when National Review was beginning to descend into neoconservatism.”
          Could be. But who cares? Why he was fired. Sobran got stroked plenty by Buckley and the other way around. Somehow the blowhard was called the most brillant columnist in the US, by some of the right wing- Buchanan, Jared Taylor. He was lionized by William “Big Vocabulary” Buckley, himself. But Who Cares? What he thought. A passing fancy, an Eastern Michigan B.A. with Shakespearean rhetorical ruminations. LOL. A cad, a dud, a briny brackish swoondoodlering balderdasher. A pomp and circumstancer.

      1. Only in minds of People who were educated in US universities –Anne frank and Holocaust are Big lies that Jews have spun.
        Jew is a master liar , just like indians
        Wonder if Robert himself is a Jew, most Jews act as if they are left wingers but they are most dangerous people on earth
        Robert are you Jewish?,
        Anne frank is a Fake, That dictionary is written by a Jew to garner sympathy
        There are millions of Documentary evidence which shows that all anne frank story is another Jewish bullshit

      2. In 1980, because of a lawsuit in a German court, the German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA], forensically examined the original “diary” manuscript. Their analysis determined that “significant” portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war (Anne Frank died in March 1945).
        The BKA also determined that none of the “diary” handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting. Earlier handwriting experts had determined that all of the writing in the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire “diary” was a postwar fake.
        The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank.
        The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the “diary” and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15th, 1959, as follows: “History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. “The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank’s Diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.
        “A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the Anne Frank Diary.”
        Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, has promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just as it was and “implanted” it in the diary as being his daughter’s intellectual work.” Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated: “I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.
        The 15-year-old girl and her father, Otto Frank, were deported from the Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March 1945.
        Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January 1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in Switzerland in 1980. If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank, neither she, nor her father and sister (along with many other Jews), would not have “survived” Auschwitz. “As tragic as it was,” said Weber, “their fate cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.”

      3. No robert, you are again caught up with Jewish lies, sadly because you like left you are fooled into believing the Jewish parasitic filth
        Sadly you will even believe that Holocaust bullshit .
        Read normal Finkelstein-Holocaust and other Jewish Storys are fiction
        Sadly robert you are left wing guy so you generally believe in Lies Created by Left
        If you see human history its Left Wing fanatics who have done more harm than Right wing

  11. Robert
    It is obvious that the roots in Protestant Christianity that the US has is the main cause of the US support for Israel. This works out in multiple ways. If the US indeed was a true secular country, the separation of church and state would be part of people’s mindset and no matter what the political party, religion would not be part of any political discussions or debates. That would mean that the issue of Israel could never even be discussed and nobody would place such importance on a minority group. A large number of protestants also believe in the bible literally (including all the bullshit that is so liberally sprinkled in the texts) and hence Christian Zionism is in perfect resonance with their beliefs.
    While I myself don’t give a shit either way as far as Israel is concerned, I would imagine that other than fighting Jewish money in big business, the step that can be taken is to make a constitutional amendment that bans discussion of specific foreign countries during elections. So no discussions about Russia, Israel, Iran or whatever. Why the hell would Obama or Romney would even want to discuss this shit in public? Its not like your regular dumbass american knows any better if the cold war is still going on. Romney the other day described Russia as America’s number one threat today. Other than the CIA, I’m not sure if anybody else would know any better. So why the hell even discuss this crap in public during election time? If I were Russian, I’d be laughing my ass off at this stupidity.

    1. Why doesn’t Putin pander to Israel the way America does?
      His economy is controlled by jewish oligarchs, but he puts his foot down and squashes those that disagree with him.
      And Russia is a major energy player and is the tit for Europe’s energy. They are America’s geopolitical enemy no.3, after Israel and China.

      1. Its obvious that Russians are not protestant christian idiots. They are orthodox Christian idiots. That is why Putin can make guys like Roman Abramovich bend over and take it in from him and nobody will give a shit. America on the other hand is full of Baptist crazies who can empathize easily with Zionism simply because the bible is full of dumb shit that can be twisted to form Zionist interpretations. See? It is the people and their belief.
        If Russia plays in energy, then they are a “competitor” and not an “enemy”. Same for China. Some difference huh?

        1. “If Russia plays in energy, then they are a “competitor” and not an “enemy”. Same for China. Some difference huh?”
          Right.
          Russia is not held by strings like America’s control of the Arab World. Therefore, outside of US power and an enemy.
          The funniest thing regarding American Christianity is that Judaism has no link at all. The KKK has always been against the rise of Judaism and garnered much of their support from the most Christian, Southern States. It’s just politically advantageous to support Jews, and both parties have manipulated people’s minds to link the two religions. Christian values are now Judeo-Christian. Throw 9/11 and Islam into the melting pot, and you have a common enemy!
          I’m not a fan of Putin, and I feel he has to do more to curb down the Russian oligarchs, but he has made great strides against their corruption that no other American politician would ever dream of.

  12. Nope, my elephant analogy was pretty apt. We can spend all day making anagrams or chopping up words looking for secret codes. I am certain that you and your ilk would be very good at that– it seems to be all you ever do.
    There is no Jewish conspiracy. Ashkenazi Jews are just smart, so it’s natural for them to excel in intellectual fields like politics and business.

    1. “you and your ilk would be very good at that– it seems to be all you ever do.”
      Co-sign!
      Though I find it infinitely preferable to shooting up a day school, old aged home, or community center. Not that Dota could ever muster up the courage to go through with it.

  13. Hey Robert, do you agree with BAG that is is more the puratanical roots of this country rather than Jewish power that is behind that masss pocd hysteria?

  14. Ishmael
    Obviously you misread Car Guy. He only used “white” people in parentheses as a gesture of sarcasm. There are some prominent Irish and Italian families.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.