Matriarchy (Feminist Rule) Destroys Every Society That Implements It

You know, women never used this word “creepy” or “creep” back in the old days. All this shit is new. Shy, nerdy, dorky, weird guys (harmless) were never seen as creepy or creeps.
This is what happens when you let women rule. You end up with millions of ballbreaking feminist cunt types, rape hysteria, sexual harassment hysteria, mass calling men creeps (shaming, emasculation and humiliation of men for the crime of being low status), millions of enraged and increasingly dysfunctional Incels, mass movements towards female hypergamy, Alphas cleaning up like crazy.
It’s all just shit. Women need to be ruled, and they need to be controlled. Men must rule women. When women get power, you get the Hobbesian Hell that I just described. It’s Hell on Earth. There’s a reason why we never let these bitches rule us. They’re too crazy to run society, and any society they run turns to Hell very quickly.
You see, if these cunts had their way, they would make rules that only high status men could look at them or approach them. That’s the Female Utopia. In the Female Utopia, the hotties never have to bothered by low status males looking at them, much less talking to them. All of their attention would be reserved for the Alphas they craved. Any low status man looking at them, much less talking to them, would be virtually arrested or at least shamed to Hell.
Calling men creeps is a way of saying, “No low status man may show sexual interest in me. Only high status men may show interest in me.”
Yes, women are that evil. They’re a bunch of cunts, but only if we let them run wild.
That’s why we have always ruled them in the past and why we ought to rule them now.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

93 thoughts on “Matriarchy (Feminist Rule) Destroys Every Society That Implements It”

  1. I know you don’t believe this crap and are writing it just for reaction, so I’ll bite.
    “Shy guys, nerdy guys, dorky guys, weird guys (harmless) were never seen as creepy or creeps. ”
    They’re not called creeps now either. Creeps are called creeps. If you don’t want to be called a creep then don’t do anything creepy.

    1. If you don’t want to be called a creep then don’t do anything creepy.
      And what exactly constitutes “creepy,” in your view?

    2. “You yourself just said that if a middle aged unattractive man checks you out, that’s creepy.”
      I said he was staring, and you agreed staring is creepy.
      Watch what you say on the internet about wanting people dead. After the recent Dark Knight Colorado killing spree I’m sure the Feds are in red alert mode, especially on the net. You could implicate yourself.

      1. Come and get me. Let them come and get me. I’ve been talking like this forever.
        What’s staring? Women think “staring” means “looking at me for more than one second.” It’s just shit.

      2. @ Robert
        Yeah, according to these “creeper” feminist types, just checking out a woman, if you’re not an alpha male, is a crime.

      3. Big deal. I’ve been wanting various people dead most of my life. Mostly my enemies, political and otherwise. So what.
        I said I WANT to kill them. I’ve been wanting to kill these feminists forever. They deserve it if you ask me. Of course, I’m never going to do it. I don’t even go there at all. I just FEEL like killing them because that’s how much I hate them. So what. I’m a pacifist. I’m terrified of weapons, hate guns, and I’m even terrified of knives. Even mean looking people scare the Hell out of me.
        I ain’t gonna kill any feminists LOL. In my dreams maybe. 😀

      4. “Come and get me. Let them come and get me. I’ve been talking like this forever.”
        If you wrote something that warranted your arrest, I’d be at the Madera County Jail in a heartbeat. Not to bail you out or testify for or against you, but just to ogle at you 🙂

      5. If you wrote something that warranted your arrest, I’d be at the Madera County Jail in a heartbeat. Not to bail you out or testify for or against you, but just to ogle at you 🙂
        Thanks baby. 🙂

  2. Women are autonomous, free beings with the right to choose or reject any man who displays in front of us. This is not a legal right but a natural right because in nature the male of the species displays and the female of the species chooses, or rejects, as she sees fit.
    Any opposition to this natural law will result in entropy and eventual demise.

    1. Exactly bhabiji,But , even Men deserve this right, i suppose you understand this.
      So once your beauty fades away we will move onto the next one, and please dont come up with alimony if man chooses to Pitch up his demands
      We must completely let nature do its job–Which means, Every sexual activity must be encouraged, Gay, Paedophilia,Homosexuality,Lesbianism ,Bi sexuality
      We must not equate sexuality and Make it deterministic female value, same holds true in regard with men
      This is where i dont agree with you.
      You have valid reasons but you assume only females are the ones who are victims of these social constructs.
      If you expand your reasoning power, You will understand that its men who are always at receiving end of the Sexual Rat race.

      1. “So once your beauty fades away we will move onto the next one”
        Be my guest. I’m not a die-hard believer in lifelong monogamy. Alimony? I say chuck legal marriage altogether. Who needs it?
        “We must completely let nature do its job–Which means, Every sexual activity must be encouraged, Gay, Paedophilia,Homosexuality,Lesbianism ,Bi sexuality”
        All except pedophilia because it is not between consenting adults.
        “You have valid reasons but you assume only females are the ones who are victims of these social constructs.”
        No, I clearly described how Desi men are also victims of the arranged marriage and joint family construct.
        “We must not equate sexuality and Make it deterministic female value, same holds true in regard with men”
        I agree. That’s why I’m against arranged marriage and the joint family construct. Open the floodgates!

  3. @ Robert
    As easy as it is to decry the current state of affairs, we men only really have ourselves to blame.
    By that, I mean that we’re at fault for allowing women to get away with this shit. Women only act this way because we tolerate such behavior, and even encourage and indulge it at times. I can recall a few instance where guys (and not effeminate mangina types either) have used the word “creeper” when describing low status guys who try to approach/talk to girls.
    Many guys also encourage such behavior by some of the measures they take just to attract even ugly women. For example, I once heard from some friends at college that there was this one party where a couple of guys (albeit drunk) were fighting one another over some ugly girl!
    I think as Tulio once pointed out, it’s gotten to the point where guys have to have game just to get an AVERAGE girl, much less an attractive one.
    The way I see it, the solution for us men is to stop indulging them. No more putting up with cunt behavior. No more validating women whenever they complain of “creepers” and the like. Etc.
    If anything, we guys ought to pull a Lysistrata of our own. I mean, hey, we can always jack off, LOL.

    1. “As easy as it is to decry the current state of affairs, we men only really have ourselves to blame.”
      i agree, BAG. Mentally, women are like children. If they get away with a certain behavior they’ll keep doing it. In the show Married With Children, Al Bundy’s wife and kids walked all over him. That’s a reflection of American life then and today.
      Giving women the right to vote was a big mistake. Women became the majority of the electorate by 1960 and what are the most important issues for them today? Getting birth control pills and abortions covered by health insurance so they won’t suffer the consequences of promiscuity, expanding the definition of rape. Violence Against Women Act, the “pay gap” etc. Not to mention that outside of gender issues women are very liberal.
      Men have to put their foot down at some point. I don’t see it happening at a societal level any time soon but men can definitely do it an individual level.

      1. “Getting birth control pills and abortions covered by health insurance so they won’t suffer the consequences of promiscuity…”
        Child support payments, fractured families, expensive divorces…men aren’t the only ones who are “let off the hook” by birth control and abortion.
        “Mentally, women are like children.”
        Women often feel the same way about men–not just since feminism either, traditionally-minded women often seem to feel this way. If you could eavesdrop on a hen party of wives talking about their husbands you’d understand what I am talking about.
        I dislike that sort of arrogant attitude in women as much as I dislike it in men. It’s misguided and reeks of insecurity. We shouldn’t look at each other as children–or as servants, tools, or enemies.

        1. Amy the wives at hen parties who talk like that are usually “nags”. Nagging arises because these women care if dishes get done, socks get picked up etc, when the solution to domestic cleaning problems is not nagging but simply to ignore them.
          I clean up after myself, nobody else. If my partner wants to leave his dirty clothes strewn around and his eating plates unwashed, he’s free to do so. I won’t nag him, nor will I clean up after him.

        2. That’s a big part of it, but it’s also the way some women think their husbands couldn’t function without them, that they and the kids would die of malnutrition.
          I’m in a fairly traditional marriage, so I clean up after everyone, but that’s part of my “job.” When we both worked, we shared the housework, but after the kiddo was born we went fairly traditional. There’s a lot of drudgework, but on the other hand we don’t fight about it the way we used to.

        3. ” There’s a lot of drudgework, but on the other hand we don’t fight about it the way we used to.”
          I never fight about drudge work. We’re both grown adults which means I clean up after myself and he cleans up after himself, in our own time at our own pace. If he leaves clothes on the floor that’s where they will stay until he washes them. Same for me. I seriously don’t get nagging. Who cares?

    2. Gay Area Guy’
      I am optimistic about the male birth control pill. Hopefully it can weaken sexual appetite as well protect against unwanted preganacies.
      “I think as Tulio once pointed out, it’s gotten to the point where guys have to have game just to get an AVERAGE girl, much less an attractive one.”
      But I can’t understand why a social darwinist like Tulio would have a problem with that. You asked how this would benefit society. Well on the flip side, imagine where we would be if nerdy guys were satisfied with their sex lives and did not need to tap into their creative juices to attract women. 🙂

      1. GSG, “I am optimistic about the male birth control pill. Hopefully it can weaken sexual appetite as well protect against unwanted preganacies.”
        Touche! 😉

  4. You’r right. “creepy” was brought into the current lexicon by feminists, and fags and their wimpy enablers.

  5. In England, nobody ever calls men ‘creeps’. Its not in the vocabulary.
    This creep thing is an American problem. I don’t hear that word and I don’t see any pervasive pattern of shaming low status men here. Obviously a hot girl wont be interested in a guy who isn’t good looking or charming or confident. Just like good looking, confident, popular guys aren’t interested in fat, ugly girls. Its just natural. Everybody gets it.
    I don’t see shaming. If a guy goes to chat up a girl, how she handles it will depend on her personality. If she’s a nice person, she will reject him sensitively. If she’s a bitch, she might be nasty about it.
    Obviously young girls don’t want to date middle aged guys. As much a middle aged or old guys would like to have a young girlfriend, most young girls are not interested in those guys so they should just deal with it and go for woman their own age.
    Mass movements to hypergamy? Hypergamy was practiced before feminism! It was common in India too! To some extent, it is natural anyway. The more economic equality in a society, the less of an issue it will be.
    In the Victorian era, a woman was only supposed to have sex with one man in her lifetime- her husband. Men could have several partners. That would be allowed and tolerated. Woman had to remain virgins til their wedding. Any woman that didn’t follow the rules and submit to the male control, was heavily stigmatized and shamed, called a fallen woman. Half of the population were controlled. Woman were controlled by men.
    This is immoral and unfair. If you want a society where men and woman are both only allowed sex within marriage, fine, then its fair but for men to control the sexuality of woman is oppressive and sick.
    Traditional oppressive social forms are justified and defended because their would be chaos and social disintegration in their absence. Typical conservative thinking.
    Oh yeah, and despite the great virtues of the Victorian era, London was full of prostitutes and many of them were children (it was believed that sex with children cured venereal disease).
    Half of the most intelligent people in society were wasted as servants, maids and housewives.
    I agree with equality of the sexes. i actually want it. I support feminism. Fuck oppression and control.

    1. “In the Victorian era, a woman was only supposed to have sex with one man in her lifetime- her husband. Men could have several partners. That would be allowed and tolerated.”
      *typical hypocrisy of patriarchal societies.
      *there

      1. “This creep thing is an American problem. I don’t hear that word and I don’t see any pervasive pattern of shaming low status men here. Obviously a hot girl wont be interested in a guy who isn’t good looking or charming or confident. Just like good looking, confident, popular guys aren’t interested in fat, ugly girls. Its just natural. Everybody gets it.”
        BINGO!
        The only men I hear complaining about the competitive open sexual marketplace is men who cannot compete in it. They are the only ones fantasizing about sexual marxism, from each according to her ability, to each according to his need.
        Just because you are attracted to someone doesn’t mean they have to be attracted back. Get over it and lower your standards.

  6. Poor Indian women are oppressed, thanks to globalization male bashing ads are creeping in on Indian tv

    1. Actually Alan, Indian guys are on the internet reading about “mens rights” and have since decided that they are the oppressed ones.
      Yeah, how many Indian men die from “accidental kitchen deaths” when they can’t keep bankrolling their in-laws with an ongoing dowry?

      1. No Bhabi, Indian men infact ,its Men who are oppressed .
        Take for Example _ Hindu Marriage Law
        If a Women is promiscuous after marriage, she is not entitled for punishment , but if a man does it, he is .
        A man works hard amidst of Reservation and many other Degenerate factors in Indian framework, he accumulates a portion of his wealth and without Hardwork , Female Gets half of mens property which man accumulated prior to marriage , His parental property and the wealth he accumulated after marriage
        More over for 99 percent of Cases filed for alimony and Child support -Men end up as losers
        If marriage is a Slavery to women–Alimony and Child support is slavery to men.
        Women today have 19 Different mechanisms to choose for birth control, Its women who exercise the will to choose from which man she breeds
        Its women who have many choices when it comes to birth control, Marital Family Laws and Land Laws and more over Child Custody
        Kindly read the Law and see for yourselves
        Point about indian men complaining is that because of Gender Bias Laws , these are written towards pleasing women only for one notion ,over 68 percent of registered voters in India are women
        So feminism and Female centric Laws are Meant for big government
        If feminism is all about Equality it would have Fought for Legalization of Prostitution
        Its a great thing–Legalizing prostitution will lower you chances and lower the value that men pay for sex.
        and most importantly , you falsely Presume that all marriages ( Arranged marriages are Forced upon women), And Dowry is always claimed by Male family.
        If Dowry is Wrong practise , so is Alimony and child support as both man and women are equally responsible for making the Choice of having Unprotected Sex and choosing to keep the pregnancy.
        Infact female is more of a culprit as she has many choices to Kill the baby in 2nd month of Pregnancy, through abortion.
        You are biased towards Female, and you end up thinking that its always female who had been at receiving end of Food chain, which is not
        There are many females who opt for arranged marriage –For many reasons, and secretly maintain a cuckold relationship.
        There are millions of Indian women who are highly promiscuous than typical western women but rarely this gets mentioned in Media, due to hypothetical Ideology of Noble Indian Female.
        Females have every choice to have a selective marriage–Which means look for man’s income,Sexuality and many things prior to arranged marriage.
        Not all arranged marriages get Fixed without selective trials–If you ask both Bride and Groom about how many men or Women both have looked before getting settled they might give you a number greater than 3 in most cases–( so choice is involved, but most of often to selective choice, thats the problem)
        I am fully against Arranged marriage and Life long monogamy
        I am fully against marriage as a social construct –Both male and female gets locked up in this useless Construct imposed on them.
        But we need to consider and amend laws in favor or both genders–If Dowry is unethical–So is alimony and child support as both parties are involved in this Construct.

        1. “If Dowry is Wrong practise , so is Alimony and child support as both man and women are equally responsible for making the Choice of having Unprotected Sex and choosing to keep the pregnancy.”
          Indianman Brahmin, I am not biased toward my own sex/gender when it comes to law. There should be one law for everyone and equal legal rights for everyone.
          However both you and I know that its not true that the decision to have or not have a child rests solely on the couple, and most certainly not on the woman exclusively in India where most of the couples live in a joint family and decisions about keeping or aborting the fetus, particularly if the fetus is a female, is a joint family effort.
          All of India’s male/female problems come down to arranged marriage and joint family. If people chose their own mates and lived seperately from the prying eyes, nosy noses and busy bodies of the husbands parents/family, then there would be no dowry issue and much less sex selective abortion, or having babies you can’t afford just because they are male,and probably much less alimony, child support too, which by the way, is not huge in India since divorce is such a small % there.
          YOU KNOW THIS.

  7. Wow. Creepy means you get a gut reaction that someone is dangerous and somewhat off-balance mentally. Frankly, I think you do sound kind of crazy, just from reading your blog, so maybe it’s you.

    1. You know, you keep talking like this, and I’m going to ban you, ok?
      That’s what creepy should mean. What it means now is “a guy I am not interested in is checking me out or showing sexual interest in me.” In that case, he is a “creep” or a “creeper.” That’s all it means anymore. It ought to be associated with danger and violence, but it’s gone way beyond that.

  8. Robert, blame birth control.
    Since a woman can fuck anyone they want without repercussions (pregnancy), they can choose who they want. Traditionally, men were the licentious ones because we could ejaculate and move on – not any more. This, coupled with an over sexualized media is responsible.
    But our definition of ‘alpha’ has changed too my friends. Since women can pick and choose for their pleasure, and for short periods, they go towards the more physically attractive man, and not thinking about settling down with a stable one. When I was young, getting a six pack was the last thing on my mind, as long as I didn’t look like a slob or a holocaust pow a man could get women. My 13 year old kid is already feeling insecure about these things, most notably the way he looks! Effeminate.
    I believe a society that protects the sanctity of marriage is more successful. Now, I have had my fair share of women (I’m now 40 and married), but most playboys/girls go out of control when they’re in that lifestyle. I strongly believe that the protestant work ethic was responsible for the successes of northern europe. It was those ‘savage’ Amerindians and Blacks that practiced licentious behavior far more than societies in Europe.

    1. “When I was young, getting a six pack was the last thing on my mind, as long as I didn’t look like a slob or a holocaust pow a man could get women. My 13 year old kid is already feeling insecure about these things, most notably the way he looks! ”
      Imagine what its like for girls his age. So much pressure to look “hot”.
      I’m a strong believe in the competitive and open free sexual market, but not until at least the age of 18. Til then kids need to focus on their studies.

      1. I’m a strong believe in the competitive and open free sexual market, but not until at least the age of 18.
        Why do u keep plugging this? Do we not have a free market in most of the world? In what parts of the world are marriages arranged anyway? Outside S Asia, where? Arab World? Africa? NE Asia?
        SE Asia? No.
        West? No.
        Latin America? No.
        Oceania? No.
        Men compete like dogs for the best women all over the world. That’s the way of nature.
        Was there “Sexual Marxism” in any socialist or Communist country? Not that I am aware of.
        You sound like a one note troll hammering away at this all the time.

        1. Robert, I’m trying to figure out why certain cultures guard their women so fervently. Adultery and sex before marriage are both major sins in all world religions. Some regions go more extreme to the point of purdah.
          Why is that? Is it to curb human sexuality to get actual work done? Is it to keep stable family lives in order to raise better children?

        2. According to a paper I’d read sometime ago, the point was not to control female sexuality, but female reproduction. I’m talking about the middle east here. The more stable the family and kids are, the stronger becomes the clan. This is why females in the middle east were not allowed an inheritance, because they would take it with them should they be married to another family. This is also possibly why the Manusmiriti abominates the union of a higher caste woman to a lower caste man but I digress. Muhammad broke with tradition here by allowing women to inherit some wealth (albeit not equal to men).

        3. Ishmael, because until modern times a husband had no way to verify if his wife’s child was his. No one wanted to raise another man’s seed, so it was imperative to control access to women’s reproductive parts.

    2. “…but not until at least the age of 18. Til then kids need to focus on their studies.”
      Why 18? Why not 16, 14 or even 22? For all your ‘bam bam joint family, bam bam arranged marriages’ rhetoric, you don’t even have an ounce of originality to think beyond the cultural framework of the country you live in. You are just parroting the cultural values of United States of America, because like the average ABCD everything America = cool and hence worth emulating without any bit of thought.
       
      I had an active sexual relationship as a teenager. So did a lot of my then schoolfriends. It didn’t effect our studies one little bit and today, most of us are very well adjusted individuals, far better than the mainlanders who end up porn addicted, sexually desperate and emotionally stunted horndogs by the time they are in their late teens. Mainland Indian men and women in their 20s with the maturity and psycho-social behaviour of teenagers.
       
      Teenage sexuality is very normal and very human, unless like typical conservative Americans (or Indians), you inflate the issue as if two 13 year olds experimenting with sex is a national security issue.

      1. I’m not an ABCD. 18, give or take a year, is from my personal experience and viewing the level of “psycho-social” maturity of the people around me at that age.
        “I had an active sexual relationship as a teenager. ”
        Did your parents know? What did they think? What about the parents of your sexual partners?

      2. “Did your parents know? What did they think? What about the parents of your sexual partners?”
        No comments. I don’t discuss the finer details of my relationships or family dynamics with random strangers in online blogs. I am curious though, is it considered normal for Americans to talk to their parents about their sex lives and sexual partners? It sounds utterly crass to me.

        1. Ahh, here’s where the difference in culture comes in.
          ” I am curious though, is it considered normal for Americans to talk to their parents about their sex lives and sexual partners? It sounds utterly crass to me.”
          You’re Desi so of course it sounds crass to you, but it is not uncommon in the US for young people to tell their parents, particularly daughters tell mothers and sons tell fathers, that they are sexual involved with a boyfriend/girlfriend. Of course they won’t go into details, but generally parents will know in many cases and even provide contraception for their teens to prevent pregnancy and STDs.
          Do you find that “crass”?
          Seems your NE State is not as sexually liberated as you make it out to be and unmarried young people are forced to keep their sexual relationships on the downlow. Something about “lajja” perhaps.

        2. @ Bhabiji
          I am from a South East Asian Mongoloid person who doesn’t live in the United States. So the only desi here is yours truly.
          I have lived and travelled to many parts of the world. Most civilised people in the Christian, Islamic or Judaic world do not discuss their sex lives with their parents. Even my American friends and my American ex- found the idea crass and crude. (She talked about how cringey she used to be when her parents brought up the issue of sex with her.)
           
          So perhaps thats just a thing in the om-shanti-om pop-Hindu circle that you live in. It is rich you talk about being ‘sexually liberated’ when you told typical conservative attitudes towards teenage sexuality. Typical tikka-masala.

        3. *I am a South East Asian Mongoloid person…
           
          FYI, my favourite dishes are the meat of your gods, stewed tender and consumed with tenga leaves rolled around rice.

        4. ‘I am from a South East Asian Mongoloid person who doesn’t live in the United States. So the only desi here is yours truly.’
          Did you mean she is the only desi here? The last sentence means ‘the only desi here is me’.
          yours truly,
          Steve

        5. “Did you mean she is the only desi here? The last sentence means ‘the only desi here is me’. ”
          My bad. Mistaken usage. I meant, she is the only desi in this argument.

        6. @ Steve
          My parents didn’t ‘go’ anywhere. My homeland, which was an independant kindgdom in South East Asia became a protectorate of the British Empire in the 19th century under the Burmese Accord and was later taken over by the Union of India in 1947, by the plain ol’ skullduggery that mainland Hindu Indians are good at.
           
          I am as Indian as the Scottish are British and I am as desi as the Scots are English.

        7. @AI
          would you rather it be part of Burma?
          I’ve seen lots of Burmese people that looked mixed. They looked probably more like east Asians but modified by a bit of an Indian look.

        8. “would you rather it be part of Burma?”
          Nop. I’d like it to be a seperate sovereign state altogether, a la Bhutan, Laos, Thailand, etc. I can’t fathom why Hindu nationalists such as Mohit Gupta and Jaipal argue that the North Eastern states are a part of the ‘Indian nation’ when the ethno-genetic markup in the region is the same as the Bhutanese/Tibetan peoples. They have fallen for the political lie of ‘national integration’ that is backed by both Congress and the BJP alike.
          I am not particularly a fan of the current Burmese administration and nor the Karen people, who have a reputation for barbarity, even among the most savage and barbaric of NE Indian tribes.

      3. @ Steve
        Not particularly religious but if you really want to place ethnic NE Indians in a box, most of them are Christians, followed by Muslim, Jew and animist minorities.

    1. Best Example is Porn Star –But In Indian Context: Politician or Actress
      Alpha Females are those Women Who move from one Guy to next for Acquiring resources from him.
      Typical Gold -Digger Parasitic Women–95 Percent of Indian women are Alpha in my view–Irresponsible and Gold digging Sluts

      1. “Typical Gold -Digger Parasitic Women–95 Percent of Indian women are Alpha in my view–Irresponsible and Gold digging Sluts”
        “Alpha Females are those Women Who move from one Guy to next for Acquiring resources from him.”
        Bullshit. Most Indian women are not moving from guy to guy. Most Indian women don’t even date or have boyfriends. They get married, mostly arranged, and live in a joint family their whole life. The gold-diggers are the husband and his family who demand dowry from the Indian woman and her family,

  9. The penis is the dominant organ and the vagina is receptive. Men are to dominate and women are to receive. The rules are much better and natural this way. Women should be subservient to men so long as they are respected. For men to be subservient to women is chaotic.

    1. The yoni envelopes the lingam. Completely consuming it. It is the role of the male to be thoroughly consumed by the female. Thus Shiva dances to Shakti’s tune.
      Steve, where are you?

      1. My fucking name is not Steve, it’s Suck-On-It-Shiva. I know a lot about the deities, Kali Durga doesn’t represent everything either.

      2. I think you’ve got a good structure for a poem there, with ‘Steve, where are you?’ as the refrain.

  10. All correct.
    Feminists are are not progressive; they are ultra-conservatives, paradoxical as this may seem at first glance. But not even the greatest social reactionaries of prior ages has so firmly stamped their boots into a beta male’s face.

      1. Ultra-conservative orders ruthlessly put down the beta male. An extreme would be tribal societies (both human and, say, gorilla) where the alpha male of the group gets the alpha females, his retinue get the rest, and the outsider beta males have to pleasure themselves. (Or conquer other tribes, etc). Forms of this society filter through into the modest day, most visibly in places like Saudi Arabia. One of the common threads that seem to tie all high civilizations is that they enforce monogamy and make divorce difficult if not impossible.
        Feminists hate the civilization-building betas. Many expect them to be providers while riding the alpha cock carousel. As for those logic-brained weirdos working in STEM fields they can go take a ride, those creeps. However fact is that all women yearn to be dominated, even (especially) feminists. It’s just that the latter build up the highest wall, so only the strongest, alpha-most men will storm those walls and fulfill them. As she is only interested in these strongmen she has nothing but acid contempt for betas and “players” (i.e., betas mimicking alphas).
        That is why radical Islamic feminism laugh as we might at the concept is actually the logical endpoint of West European civilization.

        1. So you are saying they want to bring something back from long ago, rather than progress, and in that sense are ultra-conservative. I get the point but maybe conservative isn’t the best word. You can’t conserve (save, preserve) something that no longer exists. Genuine ultra-conservatives are dead against a lot of things the feminists stand for.
          How do you define alpha males and beta males?
          ‘all woman yearn to be dominated’. Meaning what? And who comes up with these theories? I don’t see western woman yearning to be dominated whatsoever. Maybe in sex but not in everyday life.

        2. I think I’m starting to get the mentality though. You guys are scared that if woman are free to do what they want, they will only be interested in alpha males and and beta males wont get sex or wont get respected. You think that’s what woman are naturally like so they must be controlled by men through traditional institutions and norms. Kind of a battle of the sexes.
          You believe feminism is a disaster for beta males who pretty soon, wont be able to get laid at all. You think feminists are an exaggerated version of ordinary females- even more pro-alpha and anti-beta.
          Something like that.

        3. For fun, lets look at another example: chimpanzees. Ordinary chimpanzees are patriarchal and pygmy chimpanzees or bonobos (very closely related) are matriarchal with female social dominance and a female centred social group. What difference does it make?
          Chimpanzees are quite aggressive, with dominant males often being violent to both other males and females. Bonobo aggression and violence is very rare and bonobos are promiscuous. They constantly engage in sexual behaviour and everybody gets some. There’s a fair amount of lesbian sex incidentally.
          This may or may not be a good model for understanding human society (it has certainly got more promiscuous). You’ve got to be careful when comparing humans to other species, even of mammals. Even two types of chimpanzees can be so different.
          An interesting question is this: homo and pan shared a last common ancestor 5 or 6 million years ago. Was our last common ancestor matriarchal like the bonobos or patriarchal like the chimps? Is it even genetic? Which, if any of these two options, is more ‘natural’ for humans?

        4. …Some have suggested that we are naturally matriarchal and the patriarchy of the last few thousand years is a cultural innovation that to some extent, goes against our nature. I doubt this is true but it reminds me of Dota’s argument (sorry if I’m taking liberties) that patriarchy is natural and the very recent cultural innovations of feminism go against our natural inclinations and ‘essential’ natures. This may be true but is it not also possible that our genomes are simply flexible enough to allow us to live in either type of culture?

        5. …not that I think society is becoming dominated by females. Its just not. Maybe there is some kind of feminization process though. We have been a hell of an aggressive species for a long time. Maybe we need it?

        6. Trixie,
          yeah, one would perhaps hope for that from a advanced human civilisation. I wouldn’t want us to miss out on Janeway or Kirk…
          However, I think we should ensure equality of opportunity rather than forcing equality of outcome. If men, on average, are more driven to powerful positions or more interested in mathematics, then there wont be equality of outcome in leadership or math departments. Buts that’s fine as long as everyone has a fair shot who wants it.

  11. Steve, much of it has to do with religions wherein god or the gods are represented as exclusively male. Bad move. On the other hand uninformed people who assume that cultures today that worship goddesses along with male gods, or exclusively, are matriarchal or more female friendly are mistaken.
    What is your experience with Hinduism? Do you practice any specific type or have just a general curiousity and appreciation?

    1. I got interested in Hinduism while I was doing a philosophy degree (which I didn’t finish, graduated in sociology) and I read a lot of stuff. It impacted me a lot at that time. I got quite deeply involved with Buddhism for some time…but that didn’t work out (he says mysteriously). I’ve met a few unbelievable teachers. I appreciate Hinduism and Buddhism and all the other mystical traditions.

  12. “Maybe there is some kind of feminization process though. We have been a hell of an aggressive species for a long time. Maybe we need it?”
    Depends on what they mean by “feminization”. From my perspective its more like a masculinization. Most of the online manosphere is comprised of whiny American men. And then you’ve got the desi ma’s betas (beta means son in Hindi, heh), who are copying and pasting American MRA rhetoric as if it applies to Desi culture, which it does not, in the slightest.
    But that’s another side effect of the Desi family structure and sexual marxism, no original thought. Copy and paste, copy and paste.

      1. Steve, don’t know where we were discussing old folk, maybe the Mommy’s Boy thread or the Single Adult Males Living @ “Home” (i.e. their parents house) thread. I asked Bobby Ji to compile and link to all my comments on this blog over the last week but he’s not done so yet.
        Now the online Manosphere is freaking out over Magic Mike. Appearantly the never knew women like to oogle handsome, hot, sexy, buff, muscular men. The horrors!

        1. Why would he spend time finding and linking to all of your comments? Do you think he has deleted some or something?
          We were talking about retirement homes. I’m going to bed now and taking my laptop to watch a Woody Allen film. No internet there. Goodnight. btw I liked the marigold hotel.

        2. “I asked Bobby Ji to compile and link to all my comments on this blog over the last week but he’s not done so yet.”
          Hah! Bobby Jindal?

        3. GSG
          Ji is a suffix that is attached to a name as a mark of respect. Gandhi for example is referred to as Gandhiji in India. It is second of the two Hindi words that Bhabi knows making her slightly more desi than Julia Roberts.

  13. “Why would he spend time finding and linking to all of your comments? Do you think he has deleted some or something?”
    No, I believe he’s unemployed, has time on his hands and is looking for ways to pass his time, so why not? I could be wrong. Maybe he is full time employed.

  14. Wow-sounds like the word “creep” describes you to a t! So all us women are “cunts” because no one fancies you? Haha! I’d hate to be you. So..we presently live in a patriarchy here in the US. Men are doing a great job of running this country-right? All you seem to care about is getting laid-failing out of college-going to prison-murder-rape-not controlling your disgusting sex drive-wars-drinking-womanizing-molesting kids (look at the registry-all guys) etc. Times have changed honey. Women are working in high paying jobs-are head of households-single mothers-educated-feminist savvy and have more rights than ever before. You are threatened by this and are very insecure and hate us for our independence. Awww no woman wants to suck your smelly cock? Poor you. Haha! You’re the type who needs a blow up doll to call your girlfriend. You men cannot control us anymore-those days are long gone. Your intellect is despicable by the way. This is the age of the woman and we are definitely superior to men. Abort malefetuses!

  15. No matter wat u say lame aunt . . Women cant rule coz they cant rape ha ha ha m actually laughing at this ! Just coz you have a few rights doesnt mean youl enslave us coz men r good at war we ll blow your fuckin nasty cunt out

  16. The only problem is, we’ve never actually ruled them. We created and ran society – for them. They’ve forced us to sacrifice ourselves for them, and their addiction to status is what makes men travel to unknown territory and go to wars to seek riches to appease them. In the old days, monogamy (which benefits women more) made it so that low-status men had a chance of obtaining partners. Now multiple women reserve themselves to a single man, hoping he is only theirs, and the low status men get nothing. Way back when, self-sacrifice could earn a man enough respect to get a mate and increase in status. Now, with feminism, that sacrifice is demanded and expected, and there is no status increase. You get spat on for surviving a war, and you get to be called a pig. The only people who benefit from this other than women are the high status males, and eventually only a handful will be high enough status to get a woman. Women don’t realize this, but they’re fucking themselves over. When a bad boy gets old, he takes his most beautiful partner and ditches the rest – so HE can have some security. This leaves a bunch of old, unsatisfied women whose only prospects are inexperienced men. The thing is, when they’re that old, the betas wouldn’t even have any use for them!

  17. i feel sorry for my american brothers(testosteronic) and women (estrogenic) for not being able to freely express their view on feminity and homosexuality.
    everyone starts by saying ‘im nt agianst gay’,umm ..thn
    what this fuck?
    we hate some minor mentally diseased homosexuals and fantatic feminists, whichh is exactly opposite of nature.
    i strongly feel that aliens from mars trying to destroy our planet with arms of feminity, and homsexuality which eventually make human extinct by not having offspring.
    and tht fucking feminity, being a women i strongly condem selfish loosers who call themselves as feminsts making children who are gay.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.