"Occupy Wall Street Inspiring Workers and Organizers," by Alpha Unit

Working America is the affiliate of the AFL-CIO that organizes workers from non-union workplaces. The group is now reporting that they’ve signed up about 25,000 new recruits in the last week alone, largely due to the Occupy Wall Street protests. The protests have been taking place all over the country, of course.
This is more people than they recruited in a month during labor protests in Wisconsin earlier this year, according to the executive director of Working America, Karen Nussbaum.
Occupy Wall Street seems to be inspiring a lot of people who are said to have little in common with those out protesting. “Beltway wisdom would have it that Occupy Wall Street protesters are pierced, pot-smoking hippies reviled by heartland Americans,” says Greg Sargent, who blogs at the Washington Post. (It’s actually not just inside the Beltway where you’ll hear people saying this.) But many of those signing up for Working America express support for the protests.
Working America reports that among the people who join:

  • 88% are White
  • 12% are people of color
  • 33% own guns
  • 33% are weekly churchgoers
  • 60% are moderate or conservative

“Our members are often not part of the progressive movement until they join Working America,” as they put it.
And according to Greg Sargent:

The cultural fault line and tensions between blue collar Whites and liberal activists is a well established storyline in American history. But Working America – which organizes in industrial battlegrounds like Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and other swing states – is having a new burst of success among precisely the sort of working class voters who are supposed to be culturally alienated by the excesses of the Occupy Wall Street protesters.

Laura Clawson, who writes for Working America, says that Occupy Wall Street is just expressing anger the majority of Americans share at how unequal and imbalanced our economy is – and how our economy and politics seem to work for Wall Street no matter what damage Wall Street inflicts on the rest of us.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

28 thoughts on “"Occupy Wall Street Inspiring Workers and Organizers," by Alpha Unit”

  1. OWS is another Soros/CIA funded protest movement which at least 2 leaders are said to have ties to Soros funded organisations who by their own admission are “inspired by the Arab Spring” which was financed and directed by US/British/Soros colour revolution organisation Optor which as always results in Islamists coming to power or political representation and pogroms/mass killings against Christians.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBqBSrrTyzo

    1. As far as I can see, they are just advising and training people and providing a guide to democratic revolutions through non-violent means. Its not necessarily that they were like a driving force, instigating and orchestrating all these revolutions from behind the scenes. To what extent that’s the case I don’t know. We just know that there were revolutions and their advice was used. Plus the idea that they are funded and directed from inside the US government…well, this film never made a convincing case for it…it never really went beyond suggestion.
      Even if its all a big conspiracy by the US and Britain to bring democracy to the middle east, well then finally they are doing something good in the region.
      The revolutions work because so many people in the country want them.
      Whether it serves some economic agenda of the US or not, democracy has great value in itself. And to be a force for democracy, especially with such clever, non-violent means, is heroic.

      1. @Steve
        ”As far as I can see, they are just advising and training people and providing a guide to democratic revolutions through non-violent means. Its not necessarily that they were like a driving force, instigating and orchestrating all these revolutions from behind the scenes”
        They trained activists to attack Egyptian police for the media to start the protest movement.
        “Its not necessarily that they were like a driving force, instigating and orchestrating all these revolutions from behind the scenes. To what extent that’s the case I don’t know. We just know that there were revolutions and their advice was used. Plus the idea that they are funded and directed from inside the US government…well, this film never made a convincing case for it…it never really went beyond suggestion.”
        Yes they are.
        Please these institutions are linked to the government as a foreign policy strategy as the documentary indicates by talking to F William Engdahl who he in his book Full Spectrum Dominance has written about it as well as a few others have written about it in the past.
        Even if its all a big conspiracy by the US and Britain to bring democracy to the middle east, well then finally they are doing something good in the region.
        The revolutions work because so many people in the country want them.
        Whether it serves some economic agenda of the US or not, democracy has great value in itself. And to be a force for democracy, especially with such clever, non-violent means, is heroic.

        Really then why don’t they do the same for the other regimes in the region like Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia that the US/Britain helps suppress.
        And the groups they support are not democratic like the various armed Islamic groups in Syria with Egypt becoming a big failure and the Muslim Brotherhood having political representation.
        The staged non-violent side is just for the mass media consumption to show the peaceful, non-violent side.

        1. “They trained activists to attack Egyptian police for the media to start the protest movement.”
          How do you know?
          “these institutions are linked to the government as a foreign policy strategy”
          ??? where is the evidence that causing a revolution in Egypt was a foreign policy strategy? The CIA had to answer questions about why they totally didn’t see it coming!
          Also, you have to give a plausible account of why regime change in Egypt was desirable for America? It was seen as a risk because a democratically elected government might not be favourable to American (or Israeli) interests.
          “why don’t they do the same for the other regimes in the region like Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia”
          There was a big protest movement in Bahrain, which was such a threat that Saudi forces were sent in. They went in partly because they were worried about a Shi’ite uprising in their own country. Besides, if democracy is established in some countries and not others, that’s still good.

        2. @Steve
          “They trained activists to attack Egyptian police for the media to start the protest movement.”
          How do you know?”

          It says so at the start of the documentary Mubarak police broke up an illegal organised rally and the protestors attacked the police stayed for the mass media plus it is part of the Optor strategy which they used against Milosevic where they would attack police and the police would respond.
          Optor is financed by George Soros British/Rothschild agent who worked with the intelligence communities of Britain and the US.
          I know the history of US covert affairs quite well in these operations to install and overthrew regimes which was documented quite well in regards to the Balkans and the massive subversive campaign against the Serbs.
          “Thousands of spray paint cans were used “by student activists to scrawl anti-Milosevic graffiti on walls across Serbia,” and throughout the country around 2.5 million stickers featured the slogan “Gotov Je,” meaning “He’s Finished.”
          Preparations included opposition leader training in nonviolent resistance techniques at a Budapest, Hungary seminar – on matters like “organiz(ing) strike(s), communicat(ing) with symbols….overcom(ing) fear, (and) undermin(ing) the authority of a dictatorial regime.” US experts were in charge, incorporating RAND Corporation “swarming” concepts.
          GPS satellite images were used to direct “spontaneous hit-and-run protests (able to) elude the police or military. Meanwhile, CNN (was) carefully pre-positioned to project images around the world of these youthful non-violent ‘protesters.’ ” Especially new was the use of the Internet, including “chat rooms, instant messaging, and blog sites” as well as cell phone verbal and SMS text-messaging, technologies only available since the mid-1990s.”

          “??? where is the evidence that causing a revolution in Egypt was a foreign policy strategy? The CIA had to answer questions about why they totally didn’t see it coming!
          These are organisations that work with the CIA, MI6, etc and Egyptian opposition figure are on the payroll of the National Endowment for Democracy a CIA front NGO.
          F William Endgald has written and detailed how it was a RAND developed strategy created in the 90’s.
          http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686
          “In the 1990s, RAND Corporation strategists developed the concept of “swarming” to explain “communication patterns and movement of” bees and other insects which they applied to military conflict by other means. More on this below.
          In Belgrade, key organizations were involved, including the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the International Republican Institute (IRI), and National Democratic Institute. Posing as independent NGOS, they’re, in fact, US-funded organizations charged with disruptively subverting democracy and instigating regime changes through non-violent strikes, mass street protests, major media agitprop, and whatever else it takes short of military conflict.
          Engdahl cited Washington Post writer Michael Dobbs’ first-hand account of how the Clinton administration engineered Slobodan Milosevic’s removal after he survived the 1990s Balkan wars, 78 days of NATO bombing in 1999, and major street uprisings against him. A $41 million campaign was run out of American ambassador Richard Miles’ office. It involved “US-funded consultants” handling everything, including popularity polls, “training thousands of opposition activists and helping to organize a vitally important parallel vote count.”

          http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=987
          To think that the intelligence community did not know about them operating or right under there noses is laughable.
          Don’t be a typical American fool the US/British Empire is a global technocratic colossus that controls everything.
          ”Also, you have to give a plausible account of why regime change in Egypt was desirable for America? It was seen as a risk because a democratically elected government might not be favourable to American (or Israeli) interests. “
          Could be a number of reasons like corruption of the Mubarak regime and the billions of US dollars squandered under his rule, US unwilling to financially support his rule, the realignment of working with jihadists forces like the Muslim Brotherhood to its pre 9/11 orientation against Russia and the Eurasian sphere and weakening Israel’s resolve to attack Iran by weakening its Southern border which is probably the most likely reason.
          It will still be dependent on US aid and cow tow to US and Israeli interests or those backed by British/globalist interests like Turkey.
          “There was a big protest movement in Bahrain, which was such a threat that Saudi forces were sent in. They went in partly because they were worried about a Shi’ite uprising in their own country. Besides, if democracy is established in some countries and not others, that’s still good.”
          But these colour revolution organizations were not involved in Bahrain.

        3. The CIA must have known about the 6th of April youth movement and otpro in Egypt but that doesn’t mean they had any idea mass protests and revolution was about to erupt. They failed to see it coming.
          The US funded Otpro during their own revolution in Serbia but that doesn’t mean they fund it today or it does their bidding. What is your evidence of this really? Have you any evidence they are funded by the national endowment for democracy or any US agency? As for Sorros, he was a major opponent of Bush and the war on terror. He is a philanthropist who has dedicated himself to promoting the spread of democracy.
          Why should the US care about the corruption of the Mubarak regime or the money they squandered? Are you now saying they cared about the Egyptian people or something? As for the main reason you gave, am I really to think that you have worked out a secret US plan to weaken Israel’s borders to prevent them attacking Iran but the finest minds in Israeli intelligence haven’t? That seems silly anyway- America doesn’t blatantly go against Israeli interests like that. Why would they openly support them while secretly trying to undermine them? Why would they even need to take such an approach? Would Israel attack Iran without US support anyway?
          btw Brits are generally no more smart or enlightened on these matters than Americans so no need to say ‘don’t be a typical American fool’. I’m actually British myself anyway.
          Lastly, thanks for the effort you went to in replying and your generally non-patronising tone (the clue I’m British is in the spellings ;-))

        4. @Steve
          ”The CIA must have known about the 6th of April youth movement and otpro in Egypt but that doesn’t mean they had any idea mass protests and revolution was about to erupt. They failed to see it coming.”
          Why would they not see it coming?
          ”The US funded Otpro during their own revolution in Serbia but that doesn’t mean they fund it today or it does their bidding. What is your evidence of this really?”
          Lol! Apart from the fact they also financed the Georgian, Ukraine, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar and Lebanese revolutions and are still operating out of their base in Serbia.
          ”Have you any evidence they are funded by the national endowment for democracy or any US agency?”
          http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Otpor#Funding_Sources_and_Training_.28alpha_order.29
          ”As for Soros, he was a major opponent of Bush and the war on terror.”
          That’s because Soros is part of the British/globalist apparatus wing connected with the Democrats who foreign policy shift is centred of control of Eurasian oil and gas and alternative oil pipeline routes against Russia which uses Islamic mercenaries as a proxy army.
          http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/15/551916/-Sibel-Edmonds-Case:-The-Central-Asia-Islamization-Cocktail:-Mosques,-Madrassas,-HeroinTerrorism
          Islamic militants were trained in private British security firms, Pentagon sub-contractor private military companies like MPRI and US military bases in the US which included Atta and some of the 9/11 hijackers.
          “He is a philanthropist who has dedicated himself to promoting the spread of democracy.”
          Lol! This guy is responsible for more death and destruction than anyone else in the post Soviet era and mega globalist Rothschild agent.
          “Why should the US care about the corruption of the Mubarak regime or the money they squandered? Are you now saying they cared about the Egyptian people or something?”
          Because the US is financing him.
          ”As for the main reason you gave, am I really to think that you have worked out a secret US plan to weaken Israel’s borders to prevent them attacking Iran but the finest minds in Israeli intelligence haven’t? That seems silly anyway”
          Israel policy makers and their influential people in high position in the US government straddle both sides of the global agenda on the one hand working with Europe and US to support Islamic militants/separatist movements as part of the major foreign policy objective to direct Caspian oil and gas transit routes through the Balkans into EU markets via Turkey while on the other sharing intelligence and terrorist info with Serbian and Russian government to get information on Iranian and other Mid East terrorist groups operating in the Balkans and North Caucasus while Jewish Neocons like Pearle and Jewish politician, activists, journalists, lobbyists, etc work with and represent the interests of Bosnian, Kosovo Albanians and Chechens in the US and Europe.
          “America doesn’t blatantly go against Israeli interests like that.”
          That why they work through 3rd parties. The US and Britain’s hands are clean and not directly involved.
          What about Obama’s 67 border ultimatum to Netanyahu? CFR members John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt book on the Israeli lobby and US historic alliance with Arab states especially Saudi Arabia ad their political and financial networks in the US?
          “Why would they openly support them while secretly trying to undermine them?”
          Because they don’t want a war with Iran but Jewish political and financial interests as well as the media are urging action against the Iranian regime.
          Why would they even need to take such an approach?
          Because of Israeli political and financial networks and influence in the US.
          ”Would Israel attack Iran without US support anyway?”
          No, in fact Brzezinski remarked for Israel to attack Iran it would have to fly over Iraqi airspace which he said US should deny and shot down Israeli jets.
          ”btw Brits are generally no more smart or enlightened on these matters than Americans so no need to say ‘don’t be a typical American fool’. I’m actually British myself anyway.”
          Apparently not in fact I think us servile Brits take the cake. You provide a good example of this.
          Lastly, thanks for the effort you went to in replying and your generally non-patronising tone (the clue I’m British is in the spellings )
          Listen you big turd or as we say in Britain jobby 😉 I was reading over your comments and looking for reference articles and sources to respond I did not take the time to distinguish between certain spelling differences in US and British words you posted.

        5. “Why would they not see it coming?”
          The CIA didn’t properly gauge the widespread discontent and desperation and hatred of the regime ie the potential and readiness that existed across the population for mass action. They thought Mubarak had it under control. That’s what they were paying him for- a) to control the population and b) his international compliance- which is also the reason they wouldn’t care too much if he stole some of it. America isn’t all powerful and the CIA aren’t all knowing. They just couldn’t know that certain very contingent events would unfold like a youth burning himself in Tunisia and they didn’t fully realise the potential that was there. I think I remember the head of the CIA being hauled up in front of congress to explain why he totally never saw it coming, something like that. They were certainly giving a good impression of a government taken by surprise who had formerly strongly supported Mubarak and it at least seems plausible that they didn’t see it coming. I know that either people in government or the CIA could be lying and I know covert regime change isn’t new to the CIA. Ultimately, I will decide this based on the link between the government and Otpro and also motive. But I’m skeptical like a good investigator should be.
          “This guy is responsible for more death and destruction than anyone else in the post Soviet era and mega globalist Rothschild agent.
          That’s a big claim. How?
          “Israel policy makers and their influential people in high position in the US government straddle both sides of the global agenda on the one hand working with Europe and US to support Islamic militants/separatist movements as part of the major foreign policy objective to direct Caspian oil and gas transit routes through the Balkans into EU markets via Turkey while on the other sharing intelligence and terrorist info with Serbian and Russian government to get information on Iranian and other Mid East terrorist groups operating in the Balkans and North Caucasus while Jewish Neocons like Pearle and Jewish politician, activists, journalists, lobbyists, etc work with and represent the interests of Bosnian, Kosovo Albanians and Chechens in the US and Europe.”
          That didn’t really address the question. How are you aware of a secret US plot to undermine Israel but Israeli intelligence is not? That’s unbelievable. It must be a super secret faction within the US government and therefore not the whole government…and Israel still probably would have found out about it if its as obvious as you say. Weaken their southern border so they don’t attack Iran?? Why go to all of the trouble when they can just simply not agree? I just on’t find the reason you have given very plausible.
          “What about Obama’s 67 border ultimatum to Netanyahu?”
          Obama for once was actually trying to make peace. Politicians occasionally try to do something good. Netanyahu totally refused and embarrassed Obama and now Obama is totally doing what the Israeli lobby want on the statehood vote.
          “Listen you big turd or as we say in Britain jobby I was reading over your comments and looking for reference articles and sources to respond I did not take the time to distinguish between certain spelling differences in US and British words you posted.”
          It doesn’t take much effort if you are attuned to the common differences. Having a glance to check is better than making an assumption. re the insult, lets keep it civil.
          Again, if America dos want to covertly bring democracy to five different countries or whatever by funding pro-democracy organisations, I might be on board with that. They might actually be doing something good, whether it is part of some big selfish geopolitical scheme or a commitment to democracy and capitalism.
          I noticed freedom house is top of the list of donors to otpro (and we all know wikipedia can absolutely be trusted with difficult to ascertain and contentious information)….well, I think I like freedom house. I know I like their annual report and their maps. I want to be more sure that a significant amount or a majority of the funding of otpro comes from the US government and that they direct otpro or have a major influence over what they do and where they work in all specific instances. I don’t think the documentary established that well enough and I still think you are a bit shaky on motive.

        6. ….it seems to me that Mubarak was a pretty solid long term partner of the US and that a democratic movement would be unpredictable in terms of how it would turn out for US interests and also a potential threat to Israel and Saudi Arabia, the two biggest allys, for different reasons (those being that a new government could be anti-Israeli and encourage a democratic movement in Saudi). That’s the beauty of a dictator for the US- its doesn’t matter what most of the population think about America as long as the dictator has them under control.

        7. @Steve
          ”The CIA didn’t properly gauge the widespread discontent and desperation and hatred of the regime ie the potential and readiness that existed across the population for mass action.”
          What nonsense and pure unsubstantiated speculation on your part and that old excuse of “it was intelligence and government bureaucracy that lead for intelligence failure” is a clichéd cop out.
          They thought Mubarak had it under control.
          Mubarak was suffering health problems before the Arab spring.
          “They just couldn’t know that certain very contingent events would unfold like a youth burning himself in Tunisia and they didn’t fully realise the potential that was there.
          Actually I think that turned out to be a hoax like the gay girl in Damascus blogger in Turkey.
          ”Obama for once was actually trying to make peace. Politicians occasionally try to do something good. Netanyahu totally refused and embarrassed Obama and now Obama is totally doing what the Israeli lobby want on the statehood vote.”
          Lol! Obama and his British international masters want to direct US foreign policy away from the Mid East back towards the Eurasian sphere to their pre-9/11 agenda using Islamic proxies to break up states and secure vital oil and gas regions and transit routes.
          “That didn’t really address the question. How are you aware of a secret US plot to undermine Israel but Israeli intelligence is not? That’s unbelievable. It must be a super secret faction within the US government and therefore not the whole government…and Israel still probably would have found out about it if its as obvious as you say. Weaken their southern border so they don’t attack Iran?? Why go to all of the trouble when they can just simply not agree? I just on’t find the reason you have given very plausible.”
          Who says that Israel is not aware of it and what can they do about it?
          Pro-Zionist elements in the US and most Jews in the US of position of power are helping push for war with Iran and hostility towards Muslims in general.
          It is not a secret CIA plan but a British plan and there instruments of political and financial control in the US. In recent months we have seen Mossad Dubai hit squad revealed uncovered with forged British passports, Soros who back in March vowed to attack Murdoch media Empire in the US and Britain for which we had the “phone scandal”.
          Then there was this Brevik character in Norway and his connections, 67 border proposal, the take down of Mubarak and the recent scandal with Liam Fox.
          ”It doesn’t take much effort if you are attuned to the common differences. Having a glance to check is better than making an assumption. re the insult, lets keep it civil”
          So you want me to scan through the words you posted looking for grammatical differences in certain words?
          ”That’s a big claim. How?”
          He engineered the post Soviet economic shock therapy in Russia, Ukraine and a failed attempt in Belarus de-industrialising and putting the economy in to the hands of his fellow aligned Jewish/Zionist Oligarchs and putting the country into the hands of organised crime while at the same time supporting Islamic terrorism/separatism which resulted in the deaths of millions of Russians and Ukrainians.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98fUyrzDyek
          Again, if America dos want to covertly bring democracy to five different countries or whatever by funding pro-democracy organisations, I might be on board with that. They might actually be doing something good, whether it is part of some big selfish geopolitical scheme or a commitment to democracy and capitalism.
          Sorry but US/British Empire is by far the worst human rights abuser on the planet so I doubt they have a genuine commitment to democracy.
          There backing of Islamic terrorist armed groups like in Syria or even Iran which the western intelligence agencies have been covertly working Iranian intelligence since 79 in overseas regions of conflict is just shows there commitment to democracy given that the US helps suppress and prop up the most repressive regimes in the region.
          Syria and Libya were 2 countries used in the CIA’s rendition torture flight network.
          “I noticed freedom house is top of the list of donors to otpro (and we all know wikipedia can absolutely be trusted with difficult to ascertain and contentious information)….well, I think I like freedom house. I know I like their annual report and their maps. I want to be more sure that a significant amount or a majority of the funding of otpro comes from the US government and that they direct otpro or have a major influence over what they do and where they work in all specific instances. I don’t think the documentary established that well enough and I still think you are a bit shaky on motive”
          What an absolute shill you are.
          So now you admit that Optor is funded by government agencies like Freedom House whose former director was the former CIA director James Woosley who during his sting was helping direct Iranian arms and Islamic militants into the Balkans including Osama Bin Ladin.
          There is no evidence that since 99 that the US and other foreign government agencies and connected individuals have stopped funding and directing the colour revolution groups in fact there role has expanded and increased only targeting countries which
          You will see no Optor Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, etc that are vital to US foreign policy.

      2. As far as I can see, they are just advising and training people and providing a guide to democratic revolutions through non-violent means. this is also known as controled disent. where do you get that optor and ad busters are not violent? from what i understand, they are violent. Its not necessarily that they were like a driving force, instigating and orchestrating all these revolutions from behind the scenes. but they do steer it in the direction they want it to go via a steering comitee. To what extent that’s the case I don’t know. We just know that there were revolutions and their advice was used. Plus the idea that they are funded and directed from inside the US government…well, this film never made a convincing case for it…it never really went beyond suggestion. anyone that did make a convincing case are dead, or in a cia prison. if i was being presented with 2 stories. 1 that the u.s govt funds colour revolutions, and the other 2 the u.s doesnt fund colour revolutions, i think i will believe argument #1. Even if its all a big conspiracy by the US and Britain to bring democracy to the middle east, well then finally they are doing something good in the region. not when the new govt is even worse than the old one. if that’s the case, then i think i;ll stick with the original shitty govt. the countries most in most desprate need of revolutions are the u.s, britain, canada, australia, and most of europe. i wonder if optor has any “advice” for them. other then to camp out on the street holding signs, making no demands.
        The revolutions work because so many people in the country want them. and they dont seem to work so well in america, or britain because theyre controled disent. they dont work well when you have a fascist police state using programs like cointel pro.
        Whether it serves some economic agenda of the US or not, democracy has great value in itself. And to be a force for democracy, especially with such clever, non-violent means, is heroic. democracy means majority rules. not corporations rule. not imf rules. and not world bank rules. is the u.s a democracy? is europe a democracy (except Belarus)? i dont think so. should they demand a real revolution? i think so. i think democracy is exactly what stands in the way of some economic agenda of the u.s.. what’s good for the people will ultimately be at odds with corporate interests. thats why the u.s and its allies fight so hard to overthrow legitimate democracies, while propping up the illegitimate ones like israel, singapore, taiwan, south sudan, south korea, kosovo, and all the other rogue states

    1. Americans could not spontaneously organise shit. They are the most docile state subservient people on the planet with years of wars and bailouts prove this yet we are to believe that thousands of people suddenly decided to organise and march on streets across America.
      We know that a Soros affiliated organisation Adbusters started the OWS protests and no doubt the usual trade unions, organisations and NGO’s that finance and direct colour revolution coups overseas are involved in this leaderless and rather pointless protest just like the Tea Party.

      1. I believe you on Soros, but what are his motives? Protesting in the streets is exciting but there are more effective (albeit less exciting) ways to hurt the corporations where it hurts. Join a local bank, limit your purchases on credit cards, do not buy from companies that outsource or use cheap labor, avoid shopping at McMarts and patronize small businesses.

        1. @Gay State Girl
          Please GSG don’t believe that MSM crap that Soros is a socialist who wants to dismantle international free market/capitalist system as he is the most prominent individual who is a part of that system who engineered the “shock therapy” economic system after the collapse of the USSR as the right hand of the biggest capitalist Oligarchical family that has every existed the Rothschild family.
          Why would Soros and the establishment launch a pre-emptive protest movement?
          So you don’t get scenes like this being at the forefront of the protest movement as the global economy collapses and the info being widely known.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEf7gGNFDfg
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMjm4LxFa1c
          As another Jewish revolutionary and Rothschild agent Lenin said:
          “ The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
          ― Vladimir Lenin

        2. @Gay State Girl
          I forgot to mention that “socialist” Soros through his Open Society coordinates Rothschild operations in Russia and the former Soviet Union like with the YUKO’s affair Khoderkovsky tried to coordinate the selling of Russia’s oil rights to western oil companies before Putin stopped it and put him in the slammer which Open Society’s Moscow office branch was raided at the same time.

  2. Sorry if my past two comments appear to be linked. Those should have been two separate comments.
    I wasn’t implying that George Tsuris was a socialist or that his motives were pure. He has never been one to heed his own call, to practice what he preaches.
    As I said, protesting in the street is not the most effective way to hurt the corporations, yet it’s the most convenient and people jumping on the bandwagon like zombies. You are right that Americans are easibly controlled/manipulated by the mass media.
    I am not by definition a socialist. I’m just disallusioned with the lengths corporations will go to to make a profit.

  3. John
    Sorry if I confused you. Those should have been two different posts. I was not suggesting that Soros’s motives were genuine. He has never been one to practice what he preaches.
    BTW I am not a socialist by definition, just disallusioned with the current system.
    You are correct in saying that many activists and reformers act as “gate keepers.” They talk about how universal health care should be available for all and promote Aid for the developing world, but will not admit the ways in which our health care system has deliberately poisoned us to guarantee that there will demand later down the road, or the fact that various diseases and epidemics that affect the third world were actually engineered for the purpose of neocolonialism, when traditional colonialism was no longer accepted.

  4. Sorry that should have been two posts. I was not suggesting that George Soros’s motives were genuine. He has never been one to heed his own words.
    You are correct when you say many activists and reformers are merely “gate keepers.”

    1. @GSC
      or the fact that various diseases and epidemics that affect the third world were actually engineered for the purpose of neocolonialism, when traditional colonialism was no longer accepted.
      Do you believe that the US engineers viruses for political control in Africa and Latin America?
      I don’t think they do but use other methods.

      1. John
        Bill Gates admitted that one of his motives for the new malaria vaccine was population control, which was probably a Freudian slip on his part. I do believe that vaccines are used to infect third world populations under the guise of humanitarian aid.

        1. @Gay State Girl
          Bill Gates is a major globalist elite figure that was supported by the intelligence community to promote develop Windows over Apples OS as they have backdoors into the Windows OS that the intelligence community can gain access to your computer.
          Gates through his foundation hold a majority of stocks in MI6 connected BP Oil Company and helps finance the Gulen movement.

      2. after world war 2, the u.s regime went to the japanese and said, hand over your bio warfare techniques, and we’ll forget about all the crimes you comited. today, the u.s regime engineers viruses and uses them all over the world. sars, bird flu, swine flu, etc. all them. the u.s regime even used anthrax on its own people. it’s funny when the u.s regime accuses other governments of “killing their own people”, when it’s actually the u.s regime doing it themselves. vaccines have been known to do more harm than good. the u.s regime, under direction from the pharmaceutical industrial complex also sells massive amounts of prescription medication at rip off prices, knowing that it will do more harm than good. they tried to make tom cruise look crazy for opposing psychiatric meds, but he doesnt look that crazy to me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.