Are Black People Stupid?

A view from the comments, with my comments following:

Before I actually worked with a large population of blacks, I would never have believed that they are as stupid as a whole as they are. In fact, I used to believe in absolute equality of all races. However, some years of working in an office-type environment with lots of blacks has totally changed my views.

I think it’s hard to quantify intelligence, but you can get a fairly good idea of someone’s intelligence by observing how/if they readily absorb information and use it to make logical decisions. Smart people “get it” and can move on. They remember information, can make connections, and apply what they learn.

Give me any other race to train/work with. I don’t care if they are white, Latino, Asian, Indian, Middle-Eastern-there is a very good chance that those individuals will learn fairly quickly, have a modicum of manners, a decent or at least passable work ethic, and will do their freaking jobs.

Training blacks is frustrating for me, because 48 out of 50 of them don’t “get it” the 3rd, 4th, 5th time they are presented with the same information in a slow way that anyone else would grasp. For many of them, when they do finally “get it” they can’t make the logical, big-picture connections that would allow them to really excel at their jobs. I see lots of abysmally poor memories, slow wits, and at best a surface-level understanding of their jobs.

And then they’re lazy and tend to be rude (whenever they can get away with it) on top of it. What’s sad is that I’ve seen this not only in janitors and entry-level clerks, but in higher-level black executives and officers who were smooth enough to rap their way into a high-paid position, but either too stupid or lazy (or both) to actually do their jobs.

If you defend black cognition the way that I used to, I challenge you to work for a few years in an office environment with a large population of them.

This is a very interesting anecdote, and you do hear other things from time to time. This has not exactly been my experience. I worked mostly in teaching. There, the Blacks were generally fellow teachers. At the time, I had heard all of the rumors about Black stupidity, and according to this guy it should apply to Black teachers too, but I did not notice that my Black teachers were stupid at all. Actually, I was looking around for evidence of them being dumb, but I could not really find it.

I also dealt with Black administrators – principals, vice principals, counselors all the way up to the district level and, on a lower level, Black secretaries and whatnot. Some of them struck me as not exactly being geniuses, but they didn’t seem to be idiots. Black teachers and administrators always struck me as the cream of the Black crop, and never once did I think they were stupid. At the very least, they struck me as “at least competent.”

On the other hand, here in California, teachers have to pass a very rigorous exam called the CBEST.Many Blacks and Hispanics fail this exam, hence there are cries that it is racist, but they have not yet gotten rid of it, thank God. Hence, most of the less intelligent Blacks are simply screened out. I remember one Black teacher who seemed to be an alcoholic. He showed movies a lot. They probably should have gotten rid of him, but he was a nice enough guy anyway.

Once I worked on a job site with just me and four other guys, all Black. We were janitors at some aerospace plant. We would work for like 3 hours, then just take off and sit around and play cards the rest of the night. The Black guys all liked me a lot. Most were older, but one was a young guy.

The young Black dude and I would take off and go smoke weed in some out of the way place. The head janitor was an alcoholic. I thought it was funny that these older Blacks would call each other “jigs.” Anyway, they were smart enough to do their jobs and play cards.

I also worked with Blacks at a legal coding place. The Blacks there were all well behaved, and none were particularly stupid. They were about as smart as the Whites there. One guy in particular was my good friend, and he was very smart.

I have also not seen a lot of the storied Black laziness and bad work habits except for the janitors, but as a radical, I thought that was mostly just a protest by some working class guys.

In general, I have found that for some reason, Blacks at work seem to be “smart enough.” Not total idiots but not flaming geniuses either.

I had a Black girlfriend once. At one time, we were discussing marriage. She also was “smart enough,” but she had problems in her college courses, and her BA was only in Homemaking, which she taught. I had to write her college level English class papers for her because apparently she simply could not write them well enough.

At one point, we got in a huge argument. The paper was on a short story written by some Black writer. It was about a man called “Douglass” who never shows up. The women are talking. “Douglass is a man!” Ok, look, obviously this is Frederick Douglass! Literary analogy and all that.

She just could not get it and was furious. She knew all about Douglass, and obviously they were not talking about him. It was as if her mind could not deal with an allegorical level of things and was stuck in concreteness. It was then that I realized the limits of this “smart enough” intelligence.

At the moment, it is true that Blacks are less intelligent than Whites as measured by IQ tests. There is a 13.2 point gap between Black adults and White adults – White IQ = 103, Black IQ = 89.8. It’s not yet proven that this is due to genes, and at some point, Blacks may be able to close the gap.

The author mentions that Latinos seem much smarter than Blacks. But their IQ’s are only a few points higher. Latino IQ = 93, Black IQ = 89.8. Are a few points really going to add up to much of a difference? At the end it boils down to what can we do about this. Probably not a whole lot.

But Blacks can certainly work on the non-IQ based aspects of their work performance such as perceived laziness, coming in late, leaving early, taking time off all the time. With their lower IQ’s, Blacks need to try to make up for that in non-IQ ways by being superior or at least adequate on non-IQ factors. That may tend to ameliorate that IQ stuff.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
20
fb-share-icon20

540 thoughts on “Are Black People Stupid?”

  1. Are u sure the environment doesn’t play some role? For instance, the Philippines (nearby southeast Asian nation) is a neo-liberal state, while Vietnam is socialist. Wouldn’t the Filipino IQ improve, if the government took an active interest in the people?

    1. I am not sure, but the Thai government made a major pitch to improve IQ by getting iodine into the diet. Lack of iodine depresses IQ by 10-15 pts. The scores went up from 90 to 99. I am starting to think that all SE Asians may have a phenotypical IQ ~99 if all of the right environmental factors are in play.

      1. If all that is needed is iodine, then it makes all these white nationalist arguments look very stupid.

        1. African Americans get plenty of iodine. I believe that in the First World, it is added to food. So no benefit there. It may help Africans though. Lack of iodine is a big problem in the 3rd World.

  2. Not all blacks are the same, just like the way all whites are not the same. You cannot base intelligence on race because we are all different, we think differently and we do things differently. Classifying intelligence by race is like saying that everyone in that race has the same education, virtues, family, etc. We need to understand that environmental factors affect things like that. You cannot say that a black child who grew up in a very horrible community and went to a horrible school is the same intelligent-wise as a black child who grew up in a wealthy family and had the best of education. Obviously these two people are different and their intelligence cannot be graded just because of one thing, race. The only way we can say maybe whites were more intelligent than blacks was if we all went to the same school and had the same education and were affected by the same environmental factors. We are all different and it is wrong that people should be compared by race. I bet it’ll be really hard for you to say a white and black person were the same, but they could be? Race has nothing to do with anything. People are taught, they are not simply born. I think adults are really ignorant actually. I’m not even 16 and this whole thing just seems wrong. I just wish, that we could live in a world where you could look at someone and not even see their skin colour, because their skin colour would just be skin. I wish that what mattered was inside. In our hearts, not on our skin. I live in Africa btw, I go to one of the best schools in my country and I don’t think you could compare me to a child on the street or a school drop out. Please be mindful, we are all different. Thank you

    1. Intelligence is something that you are born with. Desicion making uses intelligence and environmentally learned behavior.

  3. well see I’m netural about these situations. I have some very close black friends and I have nothing against Black people in general, but…. In education I have seen many Blacks who were just lazy, lack of intelligence, and down right untrustworthy. I remember when I was doing my Undergrad at University of Indiana, in many of my classes I had Blacks as my group members. The black group members did not want to work hard or do any of the assignments, I had to do everything for them. The thing that ticked me off the most about the black group members was that they lied to me about alot of assignments or was unaware of what was going on or what we were suppose to be doing. I remember one assignment we had to conduct 75 questions for an interview, and I forgot how many questions we had to conduct so I asked my black group members and they said we only had to do 10 questions… so I did them 10 questions only and we all got an F. I was naive… but I put my trust into them black partners and look what happened. They were unaware of what we were suppose to be doing and I was just better off working by myself. The point is… they’re just lazy, they don’t care, and they don’t want to participate or be involved. Many of them would never meet with me in the library to work on or discuss assignments. If I saw any of my black group members walking around campus, they would try to avoid me or pretend that they were talking on their cell phone so they would not have to talk to me. They would gossip about me or make jokes about me to their other black friends. It really made me angry, but my best advice is just to avoid them. They want to sit around and cry racism… if they don’t get their way, but I don’t know maybe it was just my bad experience. They’re just not trustworthy!!!

      1. You fucking cracker, if you hadn’t have enslaved, undereducated, overworked, and constantly have told us “you are inferior” we wouldn’t live in a ghetto, with sucky educational systems, no money, and no way of getting out of them. If things were the other way around, you’d only be more ignorant than you already are.

  4. At the fragile age of 14, I learned via a school psychologist issued IQ test that I qualified as mentally retarded (68). This information explained why I felt compelled to shove my fingers deep into my wide nasal canal while staring vacantly into the distance….

    But seriously, black, white and Asian lay people, psychologists and professors have called me smart. I tested in at 102 but I was told I’m twice exceptional (look it up) so the score isn’t accurate.

    I’m not saying IQ doesn’t matter, I’m just saying don’t oversimplify its implications…

    1. Were you joking about the 68, or have you seriously tested between 68 and 102? If so, do you have any ideas why? Were the tests quite different or something?

  5. Oh for fuck sake, this is a bunch of fucking bullshit! I’m a black teen from North Carolina with an IQ of 146, and am by no standards dumb, or ignorant. All I do is make straight A’s in all honors classes. Fuck all you racist bitches who think you’re “Better” than me. When you fucking die, and burn in hell for your sins we’ll see who’s better.

  6. This evening I met three African-American fathers, one male teenager about 17 or so and one female teenager who was maybe 13-14-ish?

    Every one of them had children, some had two or more and each one was personally engaging, articulate, and the one female African-American teenage girl actually, literally, carried her younger brother up my stairs and assisted him in choosing candies, he was hesitant, AND, she was barraged by a larger group of white kids who pushed their way up the stairs, into a limited space, so that, while she could not get down by just holding her 3-4 year old brother’s hand, she then took his candy bag, lifted him up in the air holding him like a mother would and made her way down the steps past the other children WITHOUT saying a word, without complaining about being crowded onto the porch.

    One African-American father’s toddler had fallen down and hurt his leg so he went and got a baby stroller and pushed this kid, who wouldn’t walk anymore, to every home to make sure he had a great Halloween.

    “Stupid?” …or just like everyone else, trying to raise a family in the worst economic environment in U.S. history and expecting skin-color not to matter?

    The male teenager asked me twice if I was sure he could have handfuls of candy. Twice, after I told him to take it he still was self-reserved and wondering if what I was saying was some kind of sh_t-talking or set-up against him. Was I the least bit scared of these black people?

    No. I’m a crazy white person who isn’t even scared of imminent death let alone some kid who wants to have an awesome Halloween. If I remember correctly; “White People,” have killed more people than any race in history and more of our own kind that any failed African State can ever claim.

    2 Million Cimbri and Teutons.
    950,000 Carthaginians.
    100,000 Sidonians slaughtered BY Sidonians!
    God only knows what the Achaenians did.
    50 million Russians in WWII.
    Then Rome,
    500,000 Bretons.
    One million Gauls.
    450,000 Helvetti.

    Rwandans got nothing on European, “whites.

    1. Muslims hold the all time genocide record. Totting up Muslim genocides through the ages gives 270 million dead. This includes the Negro dead due to slavery on the part of Muslims.

      However, to be fair they are tame by the standards set by Whites these days. They have gone so soft; a few dead people on the infidel side and they start distributing candies on the streets. Allah help these useless jihadis!

      Why are Muslims so soft these days? A question to be pondered. Even Whites who set records for fastest death by the millions just a few decades ago are really soft. What makes these record-breaking killers suddenly go soft?

      However, Blacks are the number killers of the day. Crime stats say it all. Check out crime stats for the US and the millions dead in the Congo in the never-ending slaughters that never make the news. Per capita, Blacks kill more than anyone.

      With regards to the Muslims, I actually blame the Jews. Modern warfare is tough on Muslims. They prefer old fashioned warfare. So any killing of a Jew or any infidel is praised around the world in seconds. Pathetic.

      Blacks kill around the clock, and no one even notices as it never makes the news. When was the last time film crews went to the Congo. They always prefer the luxury hotels of Gaza and Israel. When was the last time international film crews visited the violent never-ending slaughters taking place in the Black hoods in the states? The higher the Black demographic, the higher the murder rate.

      Muslims get a bad rep from the media. They are pathetic softies who make a lot of noise. The media loves noise as it is safe and off they go to get the latest nonevent on film. Meanwhile Africa and the hood keep churning out the highest stats.

  7. Yep, whites were good at mass slaughter, but some Sub-Saharans were good at cannibalism. Can’t decide which is worst, mass killings, or eating your own kind. Although the Whites had to fight the some blacks, just to bring an end to such an unusual appetite.

  8. And remember, the blacks were engaging in this strange feat as recently as 19th century, some still find our closest relatives in the mammalian kingdom delicious. There could have been other instances of this bizarre behavior from other regions, but for the whites to find it objectionable in the 19th century, it strongly suggests that they couldn’t identify with it, or that they got over it long ago, which suggests they became smarter before the blacks.

  9. Black people aren’t stupid, just lazy! I live in Detroit and the blacks figure if the government is giving me food stamps and government housing, why work?

  10. I’ve worked in both
    white and blue color jobs. No one can tell me Blacks are as intelligent or as diligent as Whites or any other race. As a carpenter I was unable to teach blacks how to even use a simple tape measure. In the office the only time Blacks were happy was break time, lunch time and time to go home. When we did lunch together they were always roving the streets looking for sex. It’s amazing how 2 Negroes of the opposite sex, without knowing each other could walk up to each other and start a conversation about sex. If I did that to a White woman if get my face slapped.

  11. Isn’t the guy who wrote the ‘Douglass’ story black and doesn’t this disprove your theory as to the lack of their ability to think in an abstract manner?

    1. I do not have a theory that Blacks can’t think abstractly. A lot of them can do it just fine. My coblogger here is a Black woman, and she is an excellent abstract thinker. Keep in mind that most White people have issues with abstract thinking. My father had a 129 IQ and he had problems with abstract thinking.

      But I do believe that Blacks have more issues with abstract thinking than Whites do. If you take a group of Blacks and a group of Whites, the Blacks will have more issues with abstract thinking. Sure some Blacks will do very well,

      Look on the Internet. A lot of anti-White arguments thrown out by Blacks can be easily destroyed, but the argument is a bit complex. Many Whites seem to be able to figure out the abstract argument, but so many Blacks just don’t get it. In fact, whole Black movements such as Black Nationalism and the Egypt is Black theory are based on poor abstract thinking.

      1. Abstract thinking once written down becomes a map of thought.

        In this case of an black man thinking about watermelons and malt liquor, a map of mathematical thought.

        So then it enters into the physical realm in two ways once as a event in a book, secondly as thought happening in someone’s head and finally as tool one uses again and again.

        I think blacks fail to understand the fact that such thought then has utility in the physical world. In other words abstract thinking is a tool to be used.

        And of course let us not forget that a thought is a physical phenomenon in the brain. A thing. Taken in conjunction with other such things, maps which have real utility can be built.

        So the value of abstract thinking is not valued by blacks. Once a greater value is placed on his important process they can begin to engage in such thinking to a greater degree.

      2. Most people, of any race, can’t think abstractly, I mean, why do you think so many people do poorly in math, and hate the subject.

  12. Let us imagine a black guy who has some watermelon and malt liquor. These are not real.

    They are abstractions in his head. He, being the creator in his abstract world gives the watermelon a consciousness capable of thought. He does the same to the bottle of malt liquor.

    The water melon starts to think about malt liquor. The malt liquor starts to think about a watermelon. The product of the first abstractions has produce an abstraction. This new abstraction are endowed likewise with the power of thought and produce a further abstraction. This process is repeated fifty times.

    His big booty girlfriend comes into the room and slaps him on the head and puts down a water melon and a bottle of malt liquor.

    “Yo Sho beez lazy.” She says.

    He keeps thinking but realises he will mathematically have to retrace the multiple abstractions up to 50 times to get back into the place he was before he began his exercise.

    But we know he never did each abstraction up to fifty times as abstraction can not think and he will not do it for them. He uses a multiplication short cut. And in like manner he used the same shorthand to get back to the starting point, but obviously in reverse.

    The point is abstraction have to be internally consistent with short cuts that take you to other areas of thought.

    If he had destroyed his mental process and responded the moment he was hit the would not have been consistent to the degree required. The fact that he was careful enough to retrace his thoughts back showed he allowed for necessary internal logic to bring him back to his starting point.

    My point is most blacks would rather have a real water melon.

    Most blacks have no use for abstract water melons or bottles of liquor.

    HOWEVER, some blacks do but real water melon and malt liquor will make them feel that they are wasting their time.

    BUT a few will go all the way and realise abstract water melons and Malt liquor bottles are MORE important as they involve creating a world of thought with consistent inner logic.

    NOW that is a valuable skill.

    So our black hero was right to not stop thinking. He knew what was more valuable.

    How many blacks know this?

    1. Now comes the glitch. Let us introduce a glitch in the process.Each fifth time in the sequence there is a bit of prose created by by the water melon.

      The prose is put into the mouth of a cross eyed man. We have three orders of abstraction in this sequence. The conceptual watermelon who creates a cross eyed man who creates a piece of prose

      So here is the prose of the cross eyed man:

      Who can fathom the beauty of the negroid man’s face? Who can appreciate the subtle working of the of the slug brain? Can anything be more pleasurable than the contemplation of this? Yes, say I the cross eyed man. I am Allah’s sucker. I have sucked his dick and found it intensely pleasurable.

      Now we enter into the conceptual world of homophobia which is the subject of the next prose piece. And so on…..

      So let us PAUSE.

      Now things are complex but certainly sustainable in a human brain.

      We can increase the process of complexity until we have a conceptual world which is incapable of being contained in one brain. At this point we will have specialists who know only with one aspect of the knowledge such as homophobia.

      It is this ever increasing matrix of ideas that the idea of a conscious super mind is born and this can be contained in the concept of monotheism, and also deism etc.

      Now we see here how abstraction has produced a complex theology. This theology is the product of minds that can engage in abstract thinking to a degree of cognition that demands a superior entity to be able to process it and contain it.

      We see complex theological thinking creating such a complex conscious mind or minds within the Eurasian religious landscape.

      We see no such sophisticated native theology in Africa. We see a primitive animism.

      Hence, purely from historical reasons we can say the African is hardly a master of abstract thinking. His thinking takes him nowhere beyond the harsh confines the natural world.

      1. OK. So that is a generalisation of the complexity required. Now we can concretely why a real water melon, so to speak by way of analogy, is less valuable than an abstract water melon which is part of a complex logical and consistent conceptual world.

        This why Christianity, a complex theology dominates the thinking of two thirds of blacks in Africa. Islam’s complex theology dominates the thinking of the remaining third of the negro population.

        We get all this from an abstract water melon. As abstraction builds on abstraction we see the Super Structure grow to a MEME COMPLEX. In our analogy the meme complex becomes becomes a religion.

        At this stage no primitive animism can stand in its way. While the African is petitioning the tree spirit, the christian theologian is attempting to prove the existence of a conscious mind deity using presuppositional theology and philosophical speculation.

        There is no contest now in terms of the size and sophistication of the meme complex, AND who will dominate the thinking process. The witch doctor gives way to the theologian, AND the rest is a demographic change in the thinking affecting hundreds of millions of people.

      2. Indeed to appreciate abstraction’s value intrinsically within the context of the novelty of ideas produced and extrinsically within the context of the complex set of ideas impacting a society’s thinking via a theological understanding, is of course to engage in abstract thinking.

        The order of magnitude of abstraction is the key and we can always increase that magnitude. Let us put the above paragraph into the mouth of a microscopic clown who has entered the anus of a sleeping rhinocerous. So simply by positing this we have increased the abstraction’s magnitude in two ways by sheer weight of an additional layer of abstraction and through the positing of a novel being, a microscopic clown, in an unusual place.

  13. Negro have smaller brains in the prefrntal cortex which explains cognitive deficiencied. Harvards Peobody Museum has the largest preserved specimens of human brains by race. I studied under Jensen in the 1970’s. Now Chinese Genetcists have discovered the smart gene. Segregation must return .It was a wonderful safe country. The darkies were polite. Singing and dancing. Cutting the throats of Jewish shop owners. Yes a wonderful world.

    1. Can we segregate against white trash pill poppers? 😆 They’re making my family’s life miserable, extorting as much money as possible. Blacks? They ain’t done anything to us.

      1. “…Can we segregate against white trash pill poppers?…”

        Yes. It’s called jail. If we didn’t have so many Negros we’d have room to put them in jail.

  14. Blacks do not belong in EU or US alike. Whatever they choose to do in their own continent- Africa, is their problem and we should just leave them to it.

  15. Too many comments for me to read them all. So, my apologies if this question/comment has already been addressed.

    My guess is still that racial differences in mean IQ are mainly due to microevolution, i.e., to differences in allelic frequencies, in this case at multiple genetic loci and between different breeding populations. Microevolution, e.g., due to a founder or founder-like effect, can happen relatively rapidly and produce some rather big changes. The black populations of sub-Saharan Africa today are clearly not the same as the black population in the U.S., which is not the same as the Caribbean black population, which is not the same as the black population in the UK. What about gene pools? Why is the explanation which population genetics offers not the likely one? Is separation of one population geographically into distinct, separately-evolving gene pools an environmental effect?

  16. Negroes, by & large are stupid idiots. Much dumber than their primate cousin the chimpanzee and orangutan. These animals far out perform the inferior negroe.

  17. The average black is way dumber than the average person of any other race. That is a scientific fact. But who needs science when all you have to do is spend some time working/living around a black population. See for yourself. Black culture is sick, hyper materialistic, violent, and retarded–heard any good hip hop lately? But what comes first, a stupid culture or stupid people? It’s a chicken and egg conundrum.
    That said, there are SOME smartish blacks, but in my experience, even the smarter ones tend to have deep mental problems and be really arrogant, bitchy, self-serving, race-card-playing backstabbing, corrupt sacks of shit to live around or work with.

    1. ‘The average black is way dumber than the average person of any other race. That is a scientific fact’ but a spesific negro is smarter than all the people on this site who dont have mensa IQ. just saying

  18. Hi Robert,

    My experience as a black guy from Costa Rica is similar to one of the black guys who commented above, my parents are university educated, I am a student at the moment, and I have always been one of the best students in my class, some people come to me for help because they know that I am very good at whatever I do, “others hate on me” because haw dare a black guy work hard and be successful, however, I believe that my success has to do besides hard work, with the fact that I am vey confident despite people saying the blacks are stupid, good for nothing, etc (many of the people who say that are very ugly, fat, unattractive, unsuccessful etc), I do not lose sleep over it, I keep on working towards achieving my goals.

    I am aware that one day we will all die regardless of our race, therefore, I prefer to focus not on the opinion of Whites, blacks, Asians, Mestizos but on enjoying my life and take responsibility for my actions, I definitely don´t apologize for the bad actions of other blacks.

    1. Smart negroes do exist and in fact I have met one.

      Now look, this is inevitable as meeting a smart women. We know women have smaller brains and less synapses but occasionally a smart one from India comes along and does a space walk with NASA or becomes the CEO of Pepsi. People are amazed and go back to their porridge. So it does happen.

      Returning to the negro we find they are about as smart as women. They fly high and do incredible surgery brilliantly well and people are amazed and go back to their cornflakes.So again it does happen.

      The question for me is is it eaier to meet a smart woman or a smart negro. I can not say I have ever met a smart woman but I did read about the two examples above from their bio data on wikepedia, plus the CEO of yahoo, an American woman, who is going strong. So for me smart women are a thing which I read about on the net, whereas I have personally met a smart negro. So in any case that is my personal experience.

      1. Ben Carson is very smart, though I don’t agree with his politics. There are plenty of smart blacks, but more than likely, they are coming from clean gene pools (free of incest), as well as having some environmental advantages.

      2. Something only some poor fool dumber than a bag of rocks would say, being spoonfed it by his dad about how mean and dumb and unfair women and blacks are, darnit.

        1. You need to be more explicit;as in the uk rock is a form of candy that is purchased at fun fairs etc in Blackpool etc; the rock from Blackpool does seem to be the most famous.

          I often share my rock with female negroes. They are cetainly not mean and unfair. They often share their weaves with me as I love to cross dress. We love to share and have a good time.

          People and races and the two genders and sexual orientations are not the same but we can socially engineer situations which allow us to respect each other and get along.

          This is why PC language is important, but I am the one guilty of not using PC language in my initial post. We all need to learn to use it. Sorry about using triggering language, Alex. Let this be a lesson to me.

  19. Again something not brought up is incest. Somebody on this forum mentioned one African tribe didn’t practice incest and thier IQ is quite normal or high. First cousin marriage etc.., maybe even 2nd or third cousin marriage seems to cause a terribly negative effect.

    1. Well, I’m not sure about IQ, but their precolonial and Post colonial lifestyle is indeed relatively high to other SS African groups.

      However that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s incest that keeps it down. Black Americans don’t do it and they’re IQ’s are still lower (but not bad on it’s own) to other groups.

      Incest to stop is one thing, but to select for Higher IQ’s it what causes it to make a change over time.

      In Bamileke culture in favors predisposition and wealth, so therefore the men who would be sought after would have such qualities.

      I’m not sure if it was either genes or foriegn influence that caused this culture, however the point is that they developed a eugenic “engine” to be more successful.

      In other words, stopping Incest alone won’t change the mean UNLESS successful traits for a “capitalist” world are selected for.

  20. Genetics and cultural conditioning.

    Just like African Americans tend to be more muscular, people of Caucasian descent tend to be smarter. From an evolutionary point of view that’s perfectly understandable.

    Certain caucasian societies have had many generations of people born into socities that highly prize intelligence – survival doesn’t matter on how strong you are when people are using arrows/armour/horses and eventually gunpowder. It’s only natural that the more intelligent people survived and flourished. Whereas African civilisation has never really had such a high evolutionary preference for intelligence but they had greater evolutionary pressures on strength and speed (greatly enhanced by selective breeding when they were stolen and put to work as slaves).

    You also have to consider cultural/environmental differences. The very idea that African Americans aren’t smart probably has a large influence on their schooling and mental development. If you knew people assumed you were lazy/stupid – and you partially believe it – would you still honestly work as hard as you do?

    BUT there are exceptions. I’m sure there are many African Americans smarter than myself – I’m a white guy that went to a good school and was taught that education and learning are very important.

    I think first and foremost that is almost entirely a cultural/environmental issue.

  21. Blacks seem to have a double problem that has more to do with the tails of the bell curve than its center – there are a disproportionate number of absolute idiots and a very small number of exceptionally clever people. ~80-95 as an average can produce social defects, but this is basically a functional IQ – which is why blacks in well-managed societies tend to be able to get jobs, etc. However, having a large population of incredibly stupid people who are basically apes with human relatives is why all-black nations tend to dissolve into tribal barbarism. There are just too many idiots who ‘can’t get’ civilization, self-control and all those other mysterious traits of the civilized races.

    1. Yes, blacks are complete tribalistic idiots, they almost exterminated jews, oh thats right that wasn’t us, it was you guys, how many times did the english, irish and Welsh fight through out history?, oh yeah its not tribalism because they are white. Funny how racists cite IQ stats about blacks and completely ignore IQ stats that show racist have low IQ

      1. Nope wrong again, first of all africans do not live in ‘perpetual savagery’, i know this for a fact because im an african born and bred in africa and currently live in a western country,
        Before the coming of , first the Vikings then romans later on, the celts and saxon didn’t even have a written language, thats not because they were stupid, they were just not exposed to the world
        Thats why africa is underdeveloped, same as America before Columbus, and south east asia, those places were just remote, they didn’t exists on Alexandra’s world map for example

        1. I didn’t say whites didn’t have barbarians, in fact they’re some of our strongest elements. The problem with blacks is they can’t live in civilization unless they’re managed and socially pressured to conform to a non-black behavioural model.
          Eritria and Ethiopia I’ll grant seem occasionally civilized, which is probably because they’re partly Semitic and also so close to Egypt.
          And North Africans have nothing to do with African blacks. Berbers are obviously not the same as Zimbabwean hunters.

          1. Im Zimbabwean myself and i can assure you that the only hunters we have are overpaid american dentists and yes my ancestors were premitive hunters who never invented anything, but to be honest neither did you

  22. Wow that’s incredible, there’s a word regularly used and can be found in every english dictionary but still doesn’t have a meaning! Wow!
    But, let’s solve the problem let’s give it a meaning
    Racist: a person who believe that a) there are races
    b) one race/races is/are superior than others
    c) believe in ‘liberal conspiracies’
    and obviously should be
    d) stupid inorder to to be able to ignore facts

  23. Lol. I didn’t have to read all the comments to know whats up. Yes and yes. Blacks PRETEND to be stupid. Its highly fround uppon to be smart in certain areas. I PRETENDED. And I did in the military. I even knew other blacks I quarreled with trying to be as stupid as possible. In there mind women love them and they get paid. One idiot told me “besides bitches and food what is there”. I hated him for saying something so dumb. But he isn’t dumb just trained to be stupid. I pretend to be stupid so I dont get vocal sometimes. Yawn, my book case is full of books in other languages and math, I rest assure you , the people calling me dumb are extremely dumb becasue they can’t see subtle hints. To be honest, who cares? Are not women smarter yet they dont get far without men. How many of you seen brainiachs fail messerably in life due to unwillingness to work. I don’t need black men that are smart as my brother in arms but black men who are enduring and polite. Yeah Robert is right, lazy and rude. I hate it. However blacks are trained by there parents to do so. I witnessed this so much, and they hate me as much as disgusting white people who assume too much. Yeah the whole DNA thing is dead. Because they were saying whites were supperior due to Neanderthal blood. They were inferior to humans due to dying out, why would that make whites superior? THats admiting 100 percent sub saharan that had no contact with the outside would should be obnipotent because he is full fledged modern man……the fight goes on.

  24. So i googled about africans in the US according to official stats 48.9% of african born immigrants (who are mostly sub saharan nigga savages <90%) have college degrees which is double than White Americans and four times that of Afican American, check it for yourself,
    Do you know that Greeks are said to have iQ less than African-Americans?, yes Greeks, the people who practically started democracy, the champions of classical science and modern day art and architecture are actually dimwitts according to your iQ scores
    According to Mensa their average member has an odd job, because high iQ doesnt mean anything, what has Mensa acheived as a society? Nothing
    What has the average white man achieve throughout history? Nothing

    1. What have whole COUNTRIES of Blacks achieved throughout history?
      When Blacks overthrow a country, from Haiti to South Africa, why do thriving countries suddenly turn to violent shitholes?
      South Africa BEFORE takeover: First successful human-human heart transplant.
      South Africa AFTER takeover: Rape Capital of the WORLD!

      Or did you read about how Blacks behaved in New Orleans? National Guardsmen returning from there claimed it was “Worse Than Somalia”!
      Somalia before takeover: Peaceful…Not much else.
      Somalia AFTER takeover: Piracy.

      The low IQ kinda gives Blacks an excuse…but why the long struggle to demand being treated as equals if you CBA ACTING like equals?

      1. That black people and black countries are struggling is no secret, however its the reason for struggle thats up for debate, and its not stupidity. The reason apartheid South Africa succeeded is the same reason the West struggle to compete with China, cheap labour, in SA only whites were human and blacks were just paid slaves, Zambia currently has a white president, did he make them better? No they are still a shithole

        1. If Apartheid South Africa WORKED, why not go back to what WORKED?

          Blacks WERE paid “slaves”, but you can’t exploit the willing, they came in en-masse, for what? To be slaves? Or maybe…just MAYBE…being “slaves” of the Civilized World was better off than Kings or Queens in their own imaginary countries!

          Then THAT wasn’t good enough and they decided to takeover!
          They didn’t just want to steal a Better Life anymore, they wanted to OWN the place.
          Look what that did! Cute! They broke it!
          Oh, and raping and murdering the people who made it successful, should be considered “national sabotage”, don’t you think?

          Having a white figurehead doesn’t mean shit. They’re still run by the savages, unless “President” is euphemism for “Dictator” in your world?
          They’ll have to actually go back to the system that worked. If they’re not willing to do that, they can’t complain that the country stays shit.

          Another factor you don’t want to consider is that they breed EXPONENTIALLY because of Civilized World food, money, and meds. ANY economic gains they make will be literally eaten up by those excess broodlings. Either they need to cut back on the breeding, or let the excesses die and get back to a manageable number. Whites can’t afford to support them forever, especially as that number keeps growing, and our Government invite in our OWN rapacious, murderous parasites!

          http://tpr.org/post/unicef-report-africas-population-could-hit-4-billion-2100
          If you don’t believe me, maybe you’ll believe UNICEF?
          Just for reference, 4 BILLION was the WHOLE WORLD’S population–in 1990!

          1. Apartheid worked only for white people so it is un workable, contries like Zambia, Zimbabwe and Malawi actually have crimerates comparable to first world countries,
            Its just countries that had bad systems like apartheid and jim crow that have victimised societies turning violent, just like serial killers come from brocken homes

        2. We didn’t take THEIR diamond and gold wealth, we mined our own.

          Maybe you play too much MineCraft, but mining is dirty, noisy, and dangerous — and that’s with modern tech! We can’t “ninja mine”. We mined the land when it was our country. Then the savages overthrew our country…Now they mine and SELL it to us!

          Are you trying to say the savages were too SMART to mine, waited for us to build working mines, then took it over by force and forced their fellow savages to dig?

          And how are we stealing the gold and diamonds? You realize we are BUYING them, right? Even Blood Diamonds, we’re paying SOMEONE!
          That SOMEONE might enslave its fellow savages but whites always work for what we get or pay for it somehow. Only savages try to take for free.

          Has Haiti paid the French back for their lost infrastructure yet?
          Have the savages of South Africa or Rhodesia EVER OFFERED TO PAY for what they stole?

          1. So can i come to the us and just start mining?, id be arrested because all natural resources in the states belong to the american people aka US government, so u didn’t own shit in africa because you basically stole it because you had guns,

        3. Sure you could, if you FOUNDED the country!
          We didn’t STEAL a damn thing. Rhodesia used to be part of South Africa, and South Africa had MAYBE 100 Hottentots in it, who quickly and eagerly assimilated. The Bantu invasion came later. Some came to steal a better life, others came because they were fleeing Shaka Zulu’s genocide. It called it “Knocking”. What a weird euphemism, huh?

          As to whining about guns, what DID the savages use to conquer our countries?
          1.) Pretty Flowers?
          2.) Guns&Bombs given to them by Mother Russia?

          Either way, you can’t talk about us “stealing” anything. WE BUILT THE DAMN PLACE!

          1. Rhodesia has never been part of South Africa ever,
            Shaka was born and died in kwazulu-natal so who ever was fleeing from shaka was fleeing from south africa not into south africa
            If there were 100 hottentots then how come coloureds make 1/3 of the population?

        4. We owned shit in Africa as you put it, because we discovered BLANK LAND in Africa, too inhospitable even for the savages’ low bars.
          We worked hard and turned that desert into thriving farms, a COUNTRY worth looting. The savages took over and murdered farmers, then found it was not as easy as we made it look.

          What is your bar for ownership? Whoever builds something up, or whoever takes it by force?

          1. No outside of north africa, africa is one of the most hospitable places on earth, read reports of the first Europeans to get they, they described it as virgin, or paradise and words like that, and no you didn’t own it, just as i cant come to your house and take a piece of your yard because you are not utilizing it

          2. Bar for ownership?, who ever bought it from a previous owner, or received it as a gift from an owner, or whoever has the earliest verifiable claim of ownership, and since you guys say stuff like ‘go back to africa’ there is no doubt that africa is african owned therefore Europeans cannot claim to own any piece of africa unless they bought it or were given it by a legitimate owner of that piece of land
            That you developed it does not make you owners in the sense that if i steal your car and upgraded it, does not make me the legitimate owner

        5. Hey, here’s an idea: Come to the unoccupied desert area of America called Arizona. It’s SO desolate, even the savages from Mexico that invade to steal a Better Life…CAN’T BE BOTHERED STAYING THERE!

          Why don’t you see how hard it is to irrigate, set up any kind of farming, any kind of civilization?
          Then we’ll see how you like it when armed strangers muscle in and decide to take what you built up. Could be Americans, who have a legit claim on it.

          Could be Mexicans, who not so much can’t get over the fact they lost their last TWO wars with us, they just kind of undid those events in their minds. As far as their fantasy world goes, they never lost, we just built up the southwest part of our country for them.
          As such, they tend to try to steal and destroy any signs of civilization they see in what they still think is “their” land. See how you like everything you worked so hard to build getting wrecked.

          Then tell me about the difference between building and stealing!

          1. So you mean i can just go to Arizona and just cut myself a piece of uninhabited desert and call it Niggaland?, do you think the US government will just redraw the map of America just to exclude ‘my country’?

        6. Apartheid worked for EVERYONE, stupid! Whites made a good country, good enough for savages to WANT to pour in. Savages already acted savage. It wasn’t because of your “broken home” excuse, savages were the ones that BROKE the home!

          Remember, Robert already wrote a long list of how the explorers said the savages acted? https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/the-breathtaking-effects-of-culture-should-not-be-underestimated/
          Apparently, as savage as they are now, they acted worse then.
          As to how whites became the minority in our own country? IMMIGRATION OF NONWHITES! Whites are charitable to the point of gullible.
          https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Shaka's_Empire_map.svg/2031px-Shaka's_Empire_map.svg.png
          This is a map of Shaka Zulu’s Knocking PUSHING SAVAGES INTO SOUTH AFRICA! People from India also came because South Africa is clean and India is full of shit!

          Remember, savages change attitude as their percentage of the population increases. Note the shift of illegals’ attitude in America from “Only Here To Work” in 1986 to “We Will Not Comply” in 2006.
          The savages of South Africa went from “Save us from Shaka’s Knocking!” to “We’re Killing YOU And Stealing Your Country”! I can only imagine the savages banging on the whites’ gate, “Help! We’re getting slaughtered out here!” and why whites would say anything other than “Sucks to be you, not my problem!” rather than “Oh, come on in!”

          As to your thing about guns and violence? What do you think Mandela and the ANC did to overthrow South Africa? It WASN’T pretty flowers. Once they outnumbered the whites in our own country, Russian Agent Provocateurs whispered into their ears “Wouldn’t you like to takeover the place? Then giving them guns&bombs. Mandela was caught with 27 TONS of Black Powder and various other explosives. That’s more than the damn Unabomber!
          Don’t forget necklacing, burning their betters alive…and any Blacks that weren’t extreme enough for them…and women who refused to let Mandela’s thugs rape them.
          The “Truth and Reconciliation Committee” that savages established to forgive themselves and justify their conquest “forgave” the ANC for over 600 terrorist acts!

          As to your bar on ownership, it was unoccupied except those 100 Hottentots. There was nobody to take it from, there was nobody to give it to us. The whites didn’t “steal your car and upgrade it”, we BUILT a house and car, you begged to be let in so you wouldn’t be killed, then you killed the Men, raped the women, children, and livestock, stole the car and wrapped it around the nearest utility pole…THEN blame the whites for not repairing everything you’d stolen and broken!

          How did you get your later posts to be above my earlier ones?

          1. Mandela did not overthrow South Africa, De klerk handed it to him after sustained international pressure
            SA was inhabited and you people stole it through rape and murder

        7. If Blacks are going to be violent savages, why shouldn’t whites take steps to protect ourselves from the savages, and even protect the savages from each other?
          And if savages don’t like the whites’ countries, why do they keep pouring IN, not OUT? Or is the idea to outnumber the whites, takeover the country and wreck it, then move onto the next and “process” it similarly?

        8. Yes as I suspected, South Africa’s crime is due to the fact two-thirds of black children are raised in fatherless homes, much the same as in the USA.

          What does this have to do genetics? Maybe it has something to do with it, but genetics is very much exxagerated by white nationalists on the matter.

        9. “Sustained international pressure”? Then what were the 600 terrorist attacks about?
          South Africa was NOT INHABITED UNTIL WE BUILT IT INTO A COUNTRY WORTH STEALING!

          And as to international pressure, remember the bombs and guns were provided by RUSSIA. Noone provided anything for the whites to defend themselves and keep their country.

          1. Nope South Africa was full of savages, that it was uninhabited was a story cooked by the boers when they were running away from the British, who by then had decreed that African should remain autonomous after the successful campaign by Wilberforce to end colonialism ans slavery in all british controlled territory, and the boeres came with the laughable (to sane people atleast) that the area was uninhabited because everyone had runaway or had been killed by Shaka

        10. You savages killed our people to steal our country. And savages STILL chop up farmers even to this day! Would it be OK with you if we took it back the same way? And kept killing savages even though we’d already won?
          (The last part is teasing, whites always stop when the savages quit fighting!)

          1. If by ‘ you savages ‘ you mean Zimbabweans
            1. Zimbabwe is not and has never been your country
            2. Stealing something can make you have something, but does not give you ownership
            3. The total number of white famers murdered in Zimbabwe since independence (1980) is 11, thats less than 40% the number of white people killed by right wing idiots in the US this year alone

        11. It’s called RHODESIA, stupid.

          1.) It was built by the Brits, it belongs to them. That’s why it’s called RHODESia, instead of Savagestan or whatever.
          2.) Yes, just stealing whites’ country DOES mean you have it, but does not make it yours.
          3.) There were a lower number of whites to START WITH in Rhodesia, so murdering a lower number isn’t truly an achievement. Are you going to brag that savages killed fewer whites in Haiti next?
          And actually, no, all the mass shooters in America have been Left-Wingers, some even Democrat. I’ll repost the list if you really want.

        12. No, are you? The savages currently occupying it call it Zimbabwe, trying to connect it to the greatness of the RUINS that are there. Noone builds RUINS, so whoever was there before either died off or took a 400+ year “vacation”. But that still doesn’t entitle savages to claim “It USED to be mine, so it’s mine again!”

          When I was 6, a group of friends and I played in a dirt lot. We built NOTHING in the dirt lot, we didn’t INVENT anything there, didn’t even bring any tech from home! Then some guys with rippling muscle and colossal power (We thought they were pro wrestlers) lifted us out and built something in the dirt lot: An air-conditioned store!
          It was air-conditioned, making it a FAR superior hangout to the dirt lot. The owner let us play there, but he made very clear WE didn’t own the place.

          That’s what savages need to learn: You can hang out, it’s cleaner and better, but not YOURS!

      2. What have whole COUNTRIES of Blacks achieved throughout history?
        When Blacks overthrow a country, from Haiti to South Africa, why do thriving countries suddenly turn to violent shitholes?
        South Africa BEFORE takeover: First successful human-human heart transplant.
        South Africa AFTER takeover: Rape Capital of the WORLD!

        Or did you read about how Blacks behaved in New Orleans? National Guardsmen returning from there claimed it was “Worse Than Somalia”!
        Somalia before takeover: Peaceful…Not much else.
        Somalia AFTER takeover: Piracy.

        The low IQ kinda gives Blacks an excuse…but why the long struggle to demand being treated as equals if you CBA ACTING like equals?

        ALERT:

        Major missing information deception going on. Ep-gah is not mentioning that most of the people came from fatherless homes. Instead he’s focusing on negative hateful words like savage or low IQ. It’s pure white nationalist propoganda.

        1. I don’t care WHY they don’t behave, it just means those who CAN behave, need to keep those who CAN’T under control!

        2. So instead of stupid and violent, they’re just SPOILED and violent? How does that make it better?
          Does this offer any insight into how to control them?

          How can they be spoiled and yet “oppressed” by “sustained racial system” at the same time?
          And what racism do nonwhites suffer anymore?

          Jim Crow is long dead. Blacks are no longer forced to the back of the bus and denied tables at restaurants or rooms in hotels. I don’t see many white people using the n-word around blacks (except for drunk celebs and characters in Tarantino movies). So what is being used as the metric for racism?

          Is it “I applied for a job and didn’t get it” or “The interest rate on my car loan seems high” or “people on the street don’t make eye contact with me?” What are the acts of discrimination that make 88% of blacks feel discriminated against?

          Given today’s political currency of victimhood and the enforcement of thoughtcrime that is political correctness, how much of this discrimination, wasn’t actually discrimination, but a generation of black people taught to feel offended at every sideways glance and awkward pause in a conversation?

          You hear about job fairs where 5,000 people apply for 20 open position. If 13% of the population is black, than statistically 650 applicants should have been black. If they company hires 2 black people (13% of 20 is 2.6 – and you can’t have 0.6 of a person) do the remaining 648 rejected black people get to claim discrimination? Would they say they were discriminated against if asked about it for this poll?

          There in lies the rub. How do you separate the actual discrimination of from perception of discrimination when no actual discrimination may have happened?

          1. When a person suffers intense trauma they become psychologically affected usually taking years to recover, but when an entire society is affected, it takes entire generations to recover

    2. With so many white people working at fast food, waiter, dishwashing, call center, or store clerk job, then where is the chance to show off the supposed “superior white IQ”. What use is the IQ anyway when most people are only using 2 percent of thier brain. Of course, that always isn’t bad. If it makes you a lot of money, then who cares? 🙄

      1. I guess the “superior white IQ” in THAT case is just that we’re not robbing and murdering each other.
        And no matter what percent of our brain you think we’re using, from 2% to 10%, we’re all using the same percent, right? So the thing that matters is processor power of the brain.

        The remaining 90-98% has been theorized to be anything from autonomous to the seat of our soul, to that we evolved out of using it, to locked by aliens.

        If it keeps us peaceful and alive rather than killing each other, isn’t that superior? Even tweaked-out Appalachian Hyuk-Hyuk-villes have a lower murder rate than white cities overrun by Blacks. How do you explain that?
        If it’s not IQ then what keeps whites peaceful? This should be entertaining!

        1. quote by ep-gah

          If it keeps us peaceful and alive rather than killing each other, isn’t that superior? Even tweaked-out Appalachian Hyuk-Hyuk-villes have a lower murder rate than white cities overrun by Blacks. How do you explain that?
          If it’s not IQ then what keeps whites peaceful? This should be entertaining!

          The blacks are hooked on dope. Something they chose to take, it wasn’t something that was genetically influenced. The blacks choose out of a free will to be bad.

          Of course, it could get the same way with whites. Tons of pill and meth-heads are making the lives of many children miserable. These children grow up in parentless homes and have the same angry attitude as many parentless blacks.

          Growing up with no respect for law and order, listening to rap, playing violent video games or ones that glorify crime (say Grand Theft Auto), the white kids become the same as the black ones.

          If genetics is such a powerful influence than why do wiggers exist? I mean real wiggers, not ones on movies and songs which make fun of them.

        2. Definitely the hip-hop way of life is a choice, and something many blacks, whites, latinos, and Asians have chosen. Anyone who chooses that way, regardless of his natural IQ, is going to have a higher probability of being violent, a robber, a drug user, etc..

        3. Children have to be taught to have “Andy Griffith / Mayberry” values. They don’t naturally obtain them. No matter what the race, or IQ, if you want peaceful nice people, then you have to raise them the right way. Due to parentless homes in many communities (regardless of race), kids grow up the wrong way and become evil.

        4. Oh again, as I mentioned above, two-thirds of black South African children and who knows what percentage of American black children are raised in fatherless homes. In Appalachia, either two parent homes exist, or the culture has some “conservative feature” which makes up for it.

        5. quote by ep-gah

          If it keeps us peaceful and alive rather than killing each other, isn’t that superior? Even tweaked-out Appalachian Hyuk-Hyuk-villes have a lower murder rate than white cities overrun by Blacks. How do you explain that?

          But it isn’t the IQ making people bad, it’s the upbringing. I mean I know tons of people with a low IQ who aren’t violent, like “Forrest Gump” or your typical Downs Syndrome person, or even just some low IQ bozo who might do general labor (moving stuff, mowing lawns, odd jobs).

        6. 1.) You’re really blaming videogames? I expected a more original excuse!
          2.) I just said that tweaked out meth-heads are NOT looting and burning the city. NOT is the operative word there!

          They have the same shit Blacks do, but they don’t make their shit other peoples’ problems.
          Take a look at Google Earth or ATLAS or whoever you like for satellite imaging. The Appalachians are peaceful. If they were as bad as the Blacks, they should be an angry reddish-orange, like lava in some videogame, as angry drug-thugs take their shit out on innocent storekeepers. Especially when they’re strung out on meth, right?

          As to that thing about low IQ not necessarily being violent, that might be the first sensible thing you’ve said in weeks. So then what is it that makes whites internalize our problems and nonwhites inflict them on others?

      2. You know, the savages’ constant NEED to be near us is an admission of our superiority. From Mexicans to Blacks to Moslem Terrorists, all hate us so dearly…yet all three can’t WAIT to invade our countries, rather than invade each others’ countries! That would seem to be some kind of emotional masochism, UNTIL you remember their claim that they come to steal a Better Life.

        If they invaded each others’ countries, they’d just be trading disease, right? Sometimes literally, given the AIDS rates of Africa and the Moslem Cult, and the Chagas and Chikungya disease from Mexico?

        So only WHITES make countries good enough that a Better Life is available to be stolen? Get out a thesaurus, whack yourself over the head a few times with it, then look up “Better”. One of the synonyms will be “Superior”. By stealing a Better Life from US, they’re admitting we’re superior, although they would deny it on a stack of Qurans.

        And what happens when there’s too many of their own kind infesting a given area whites originally built? It turns to shit and they complain or flee.
        Even Saudis are complaining that Beverly Hills is not “secure” anymore, because…wait for it… There’s too many Saudis!
        The irony is richer than all of them put together.

        We have Mexicans complaining that they’re not magically better off in America, that the crime is too high in the areas they infest.
        And we have Blacks complaining about their own kinds’ crime and violence, but when we send in the cops to try to STOP it, they bitch LOUDER about that! So we go on the Path Of Least Bitching, and try to MINIMIZE the damage they do to less infested areas.

        Now try to find whites doing ANYTHING like that to nonwhite countries?
        The closest you’ll find is terrorist countries, where we shoot the bad ones (As if there were good and bad terrorists) to punish them for some transgression or other.

        If the savages really ARE our equals, why don’t they stop bitching about how WE treat THEM in OUR country, and actually declare war on us, make it THEIR country officially?
        Maybe because a lot of them would die from the surprise of whites fighting back?
        To spare them embarrassment, the official record would be edited to say they died from “Gunshot Trauma” or some bullshit like that.

        1. If only you hadn’t invaded the whole world we wouldn’t be here, you’d be civilised in europe, we’d be savages in Africa, every one would be happy, but no you had to invade the whole world, destroy entire communities, push entire species into extinction, build nuclear bombs, create CFC, manufacture napalm, grow anthrax, deny climate change, put animals into captivity

          You are not just evil to minorities, you are evil to everything that has ever existed

        2. We didn’t INVADE the world, we CIVILIZED it!
          After being slaves of savages for 700 years, we decided the only way to not BE slaves was to ENSLAVE savages. Then we ENDED slavery, and when we let our foot off the savages’ neck, they decided to try to put their foot back on OUR necks! From takeovers of lesser countries to riots in America, to the Moslem Terrorists re-emerging as a threat.
          Go ahead and deny one of those!

          As to destroying communities, and pushing species into extinction, so did the savages.
          What are you bringing up CFC for? That’s such a 90s thing!
          As to Anthrax, so did the Moslem terrorists, remember?

          As to “Climate Change”, you idiots can’t even decide which direction it’s changing.

          More importantly, it’s actually beneficial!
          http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=23746
          Now THAT is information you’re intentionally omitting!

        3. If you hate our civilization and tech so much, please stop using it.
          Deed your house, car, computer, and anything else from the Civilized World to someone who appreciates it!
          I hope you don’t get sick, you might have to use our medical systems!
          I hope you grow your own food too, you might have to eat ours!

          BTW, any Civilized World tech that savages use, STILL CREATES POLLUTION! If you truly believe in Global Warming or Climate Change or whatever you call it, STOP USING OUR TECH! Or lower your population, so less pollution is created. Also remember the battery farming we have to use to FEED your excess population, creates MORE pollution!

          1. Sorry but you cant own technology
            If technology could be owned, you’d be able to put a patent for it e.g you can have a patent for a specific design of a phone, but you cant have a phone patent

        4. Wow, so because of a legal technicality, you don’t believe it’s white tech?
          Where do you think the electricity you’re using comes from?
          Who do you think invented the computer, the Internet, so you can bitch at us about how “horrible” our civilization is. If you don’t like us, stop using the products we invented to make US more comfortable.
          Live as Savage As You Wanna Be, just be ready to give up the conveniences and luxuries of civilization.
          As to lynching, raping, burning people alive, that’s how the savages acted in South Africa. Did you look up “Necklacing”?
          (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2f45lMIOhY)

          Jim Crow and similar laws were to keep us safe from these savages by physical separation.
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/11/24/why-race-is-important/
          Read up on why race is important, and why one group is pathogenic at a rate many times that of whites…If you were white, what would YOU do to protect yourself and what you built from savages like that?

          1. Well in that case then white people are retarded because there’s a good 2%of them who are
            And no, thats not a technicality, its reality you cant own technology because it involves entire nations and generations e.g. a car is made up of thousands ideas developed over thousands of years starting from the savege who discovered fire to the savage first learned to count, if the person who discovered fire, patented it and stopped everyone else from using it, there would be no combustion engine, and the person who first learned to count patented counting, nobody would be able to do anything

        5. Yes, 2% of whites ARE retarded, and we treat those ones accordingly. THE BULK of Blacks act violent and/or retarded, but ALL Blacks want to not only be treated as if they were equal of whites, but avoid punishment that whites would incur if they did the same thing.

          I had you pegged for a Black Invention Myths believer…But be honest, your “Inventions Belong To All” nobility is only because you want savages to overthrow white civilization WITHOUT having to give up the benefits white civilization brought, right? You want OUR cake and eat it too, as it were?

          1. No i dont want to take ‘your inventions’ im just stating the fact that you cant patent them because every invention owes much to many people
            My point about the 2%,
            Yes most inventions were invented by people who were/are white but most white people have/will never invent anything
            2% of white people are retarded but white people do not call themselves retarded yet inventers make less than 0.1% of white people were/are inventors and white people call themselves inventors

  25. quote by ep-gah

    Another factor you don’t want to consider is that they breed EXPONENTIALLY because of Civilized World food, money, and meds. ANY economic gains they make will be literally eaten up by those excess broodlings. Either they need to cut back on the breeding, or let the excesses die and get back to a manageable number. Whites can’t afford to support them forever, especially as that number keeps growing, and our Government invite in our OWN rapacious, murderous parasites!

    http://tpr.org/post/unicef-report-africas-population-could-hit-4-billion-2100
    If you don’t believe me, maybe you’ll believe UNICEF?
    Just for reference, 4 BILLION was the WHOLE WORLD’S population–in 1990!

    What is the civilized world supposed to do? Not help them? 🙄 Also, the comment about them being savages is a massive generalization.

    I guess in a situation like this, the best thing to do is start colonizing other planets. Guess will call it “Afro Planet” 😆

    1. Yes, we should stop feeding and medicating the savages that kill us, overthrown our countries, then try to invade the countries they haven’t overthrown yet, presumably to repeat the process.
      No other organism feeds its predators! Some even evolve to poison their predators or otherwise inconvenience/kill them. Why should we do differently?

      As to calling them savages being a “massive generalization”, maybe, but over 90% of it isn’t. They might wear civilized clothes, but if they still act the same way, isn’t that just “Lipstick on a Pig” to steal a Liberal expression? Haven’t the last two weeks in America provided enough examples? The ones in South Africa act WORSE! Why do you think it’s the Rape Capital of the WORLD? Why do you think their officials stopped reporting stats to the UN?

      As to colonizing another planet, great…But how will you get the savages to leave Earth? Remember, when we offered free land, livestock and tools to leave America and create their own country, only 8,000-13,000 Blacks took us up on the deal. And that was over a CENTURY! Cruise ships take more than that on ONE TRIP — PLUS PASSENGERS!

      The rest stayed behind so they could demand freebies, loot&burn our cities and herass Trump.

      Of course, if whites go first, make a thriving civilization just BEGGING to be looted, no force known to science will be able to STOP them from going there, right?

      1. If blacks are as bad as you say, then they will eventually kill themselves off, or at least vastly reduce thier own numbers, even with the benefits of civilization (western medication, food etc..)

        Anyhow, don’t you think imperalism plays a role in the hell hole of Africa. How come these far right wingers ignore that aspect of the problem?

        1. Civilized World food and medicine prevent Lord Darwin from pruning the excess. As to imperialism, how would they GET food and medicine without Imperialism? Stopping Lord Darwin is a BIG influence.

          But the other thing is, whites always set aside “Reservations” for savages. Why do they keep trying to get into OUR areas? They can be as nasty as they want in THEIR areas with ZERO repercussions!

          What hellhole of Africa? Under Civilized World rule, they were good countries. They’re hell NOW because savages overthrew it.
          If I told you Detroit in the 1950s, a 9-year-old girl could walk down any street unarmed and unharmed, would you accuse me of being high, or would you treat it as a matter of recorded history?

          If the latter, what changed? Maybe the 5 Corrupt Black Mayors?
          Maybe the abolition of STRESS Units, and replacing the normal cops with Black thugs in uniform who would either turn a brown eye to the mayhem, or offer to help–THE THUGS? Maybe a week-long riot in 1967 that scared off all legit businesses, the whites that depended on them for jobs, and even blacks who DIDN’T want to be part of the permanent crime-wave!

          1. Africans were thriving before Europeans fucked them up, they were living in perfect harmony with nature, we had biodegradable houses, we never over fished or bring rhinos and cheetahs to the brink of extinction, we could burn entire Forrests but we never damaged the ozone layer, we never created black Forrests, nor landfills

        2. Best example ever: CONGO.
          Peoples’ Republic my ass.

          http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/06/ignore-congo-atrocities-africa-drc-horror
          We ignore it because every time we tried to fix it, we get bitched out as “imperialist”!

          King Leopold somehow turned it into a private sweatshop and it was peaceful. Britain turned it into Zaire, and it was still peaceful.
          What happened when the Brits left/were overthrown, depending whose version you like?
          If you don’t trust The Guardian, do a quick search for “Congo Atrocities”
          You’ll get an eyeful, I guarantee it!

          If anything, imperialism temporarily made it better.
          Robert had a long spiel about the “Breathtaking Transformative Power” of Civilized World culture on savages. They’re THIS bad now/still, but 400 years ago, they were beyond Hobbesian. In areas where the Civilized World hasn’t fully penetrated, they actually DO exterminate each other.
          As in REAL genocide, no survivors!
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/the-breathtaking-effects-of-culture-should-not-be-underestimated/

        3. Savages were not THRIVING, the only way you could claim you lived in “harmony with nature” is that disease and each other kept your population low. HOWEVER, savages MADE the Sahara Desert! It used to be a forest or jungle! So don’t start playing Holier-Than-Thou with the environment! Whites have never de-terraformed on THAT scale!

          If you want to bring up the Brazilian Rainforest, go ahead, but I think the Sahara is the tiniest bit bigger!

      2. quote by ep-gah

        As to colonizing another planet, great…But how will you get the savages to leave Earth? Remember, when we offered free land, livestock and tools to leave America and create their own country, only 8,000-13,000 Blacks took us up on the deal. And that was over a CENTURY! Cruise ships take more than that on ONE TRIP — PLUS PASSENGERS!

        The rest stayed behind so they could demand freebies, loot&burn our cities and herass Trump.

        A lot of people didn’t want blacks to leave. The US needed cheap labor at the time. In fact, a lot of whites didn’t like the fact blacks left in great numbers to go the north USA back around 1910.

        Of course, before the Civil War, they REALLY didn’t want blacks to leave the south. They were making a fortune of the cheap labor. However, the planters got greedy, wanted to get into food, rather than luxury crops, and as I said in another post, brought on northern resentment (and war).

        1. A “Lot of people” didn’t want Blacks to leave? You DO realize that Lincoln’s justification to the North for the Civil War was to get rid of the Blacks forever. He meant kick out, not kill. From Lincoln to Eisenhower, that’s 100 years, the Government offered them a FREE trip home.

          However, BEFORE that, there was the Society for American Colonization, which sent Blacks home even BEFORE they were free. Imagine stealing someone’s property and sending it to another country.

          A lot of whites didn’t like Blacks living near THEM in the North. It’s kind of sadly funny. Why do you think segregation lasted so long, even in the North?

          I always thought the Civil War was motivated by the Morill Tariff, but yes, money, not slavery, was the motivator. That’s not the part I’m arguing.
          Illegals are the new slaves, but instead of the owners paying their upkeep, taxpayers — AKA EVERYONE — pays!

        2. quote by ep-gah

          However, BEFORE that, there was the Society for American Colonization, which sent Blacks home even BEFORE they were free. Imagine stealing someone’s property and sending it to another country.

          So your saying a slave is rightful property? Right? In other words, your saying slavery is morally right and justifiable. Your even saying this statement in the 21st century.

        3. During that time it was. You’re committing the CARDINAL sin of history, which is trying to shoehorn modern laws and ways of thinking into back then.

          Geronimo was a War Criminal, but we treated it like any other enemy. Think about that.

          Now read this carefully:
          BACK THEN, slavery was LEGAL.
          People paid a lot of MONEY for them.
          Only the richest could afford them.
          Ironically, the biggest slaveowners were freed Blacks themselves!
          The irony of that flattens you, right?

          What is the most expensive thing you own? Would you like someone to just TAKE it from you?

    2. Also, it’s been predicted that if we DID get away from their squalor and violence, a champion would rise among them and wreck it so we wouldn’t have it either. That’s the message of the movie “Elysium”

  26. The vast majority of African Americans I have ever met are completely unintellectual. It’s true most are just “smart enough” to get by. I am black. A dark skinned black male and. People always looked at me funny because I was always more interested in books than sports. I don’t think i’m particularly bright but, I spend most of my time reading and have acquired tons of information, that was allowed me to start thinking more critically and making more connections between concepts from my reading and stuff happening in my world.

      1. See, this is the problem Blacks who want to intellectualize face: They get accused of being “white” or at least “Not Black Enough” by the ones who want to remain savage.

        Or they get 50-on-1 beatings by the savages!
        (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uKP7fprWmE)
        Then the savage ones riot because they’re treated like the animals they are, rather than equals to their hosts.

        1. I don’t think that’s anything unique to blacks. Whites accuse other whites who try hard of “blowing the teacher or boss”. Asians consider other Asians who are too nice to whites as “co-towing to a foreign power”. It’s all just nationalism and pride. It has little to do with real “school-phobia” so to speak.

          I guess to an extent I understand it. However, a lot of it is ridiculous and hurts the feelings of other groups. For instance, Malcom X saying “Whites can do nothing to help us.” would have hurt many liberals.

        2. Wow, really? You or some white you know took a 50-on-one beating for doing too well in work or school?
          If not, then please return to topic: Blacks behave worse than whites.
          Whites may INSULT you for doing better than them, but not BEAT YOU DOWN for it!

  27. quote by ep-gah

    Has Haiti paid the French back for their lost infrastructure yet?

    The French abused the slaves. The slaves died like crazy, even though they were resistant to disease. They died so much, they had to bring in replacements. So now you want Haiti to pay the French for making their ancestors slaves? Come on. 😆

    Note, even if you think someone is inferior, say children or the mentally retarded, that doesn’t give you free license to abuse them.

      1. It does when Moslems or Blacks take white slaves, so why the opposite is so evil?

        And did you look up the Haiti Massacre?

        I don’t want the savages to pay for making their ancestors slave, I want them to pay for STEALING THE COUNTRY! And killing the rightful owners, but that, the dollar amount is too negotiable.

        If someone murders you, your family, and steals all your Earthly possessions, shouldn’t the State take that away from them, plus interest? I think they call it a “fine”!

        1. And did you look up the Haiti Massacre?

          It’s a war. There is no politically correct war. In the Vietnam War, there was even tales of US soldiers making cigar boxes from enemy women soldiers’ breasts.

          I don’t want the savages to pay for making their ancestors slave, I want them to pay for STEALING THE COUNTRY! And killing the rightful owners, but that, the dollar amount is too negotiable.

          They commited the first crime by making slaves of the Africans to begin with. They stole property, human property, first. Next, the so called savages took their property. It’s all revenge and justice, operating on the “fine” idea you quoted.

  28. Yep, in response to ep-gah, it seems parentless homes cause the crime in South Africa too. So much for the “total genetic theory” 🙄

    http://www.economist.com/node/14564621

    The reason for South Africa’s high crime rate is a topic of anguished debate. Apartheid’s brutal legacy, high unemployment and poverty, gaping social inequality, the absence of a father in nearly two-thirds of black homes,

    the absence of a father in nearly two-thirds of black homes,

    1. Perhaps, in response to the poor Appalachan paradox thing, that applachian whites, despite massive poverty, have two parent homes, or at least some strong cultural background to make up for it. That would explain why cities in West Virginia etc.. are not being burned down and whatnot, and there is no looting.

      1. A strong cultural background, huh? So what stropped savages from either developing a “strong cultural background” or better yet, ditching their failed culture and adopting our clearly more successful one en masse…You know, instead of the contempt they show for our culture, or anyone who “Acts White”™?

        1. quote by ep-gah

          A strong cultural background, huh? So what stropped savages from either developing a “strong cultural background” or better yet, ditching their failed culture and adopting our clearly more successful one en masse…You know, instead of the contempt they show for our culture, or anyone who “Acts White”™?

          Your talking of an easy solution. You can’t easily fix society problems like that. For instance, the South African problem was caused by AIDS. The US problem was caused by a wrongly designed welfare system among other things.

          Perhaps in a sense they created thier own problem, but in other major ways they did not. However, just calling whole groups of people “savages” etc..is ignoring a lot of key information.

        2. It’s still the savages’ own choices and actions that caused their blisters.
          Didn’t you yourself claim in another thread that savages were incestuous and THAT was what caused them to act like this?
          Incest is a choice, unless you want to blame THAT on videogames too?

          AIDS was and still IS a disease caused by your own choices and actions.

          As to the Welfare system, it was designed originally to help abandoned mothers. Blacks decided to game it…and they’ve been doing so ever since. Who needs a Daddy when you’ve got Uncle–Uncle Sam?
          But seriously, I am saddened that the Welfare caseworkers or whatever they call themselves nowadays doesn’t call BULLSHIT when a woman claims she “doesn’t know who the father is” but KEEPS getting pregnant!

          Cutting off such cartoon-OBVIOUS fraud IS AN EASY SOLUTION!
          You’re trying to make the situation a lot more “complicated” than it is!

    2. During much of apartheid, a large part of males in the black population (at least in certain major ethnic groups) worked in mining and other forms of wage labor far from the townships (the only permanent black settlements allowed near cities/outside the designated tribal “homelands”). It was necessary for workers to live lone or semi-long term in all male mining camps away from families (work options for blacks were of course legally restricted). Increased colonial-era absences of men from homes because of wage labor (compelled in some places by colonial taxation eg the British “hut tax”) occurred in other parts of colonial Africa, but (factors contributing to the normalization of long absences) were most extreme in South Africa.

      1. Deaths of fathers from Aids is an other more modern contributor(Aids rates being very high, even by African (or other third world) standards. Infection rates for men(especially) were/are influenced by the separation for homes/mobility of many men for long periods (increasing male promiscuity/prostitution).

        Some fathers may be absent but provide support economically to families (one of the of the main purposes of mens labor migration)

        1. Was it their CHOICE to hire whores, or were a gang of invisible whites forcing them to at gunpoint?

          Blacks cause their own blisters — in this case LITERALLY– then try to blame it on whites!

        2. “Was it their CHOICE to hire whores, or were a gang of invisible whites forcing them to at gunpoint?”

          Hiring whores has been a common practice of (esp) occupationally itinerant men (away from wives), generally speaking, in (probably) most civilizations/societies and often openly acknowledged as a legitimate societal function. This is seen especially (for instance) in most of Asia, ancient Greece and Rome, and the ancient Mediterranean generally.

        3. (to be clear) I am neither approving nor condemning prostitution, but the behaviors I have described (in south Africa) are not particularly black.

        4. Actually, that overlooks a far more fundamental question: Why did the Blacks move into a white country to begin with, THEN complain about the living/working arrangements?

          Shouldn’t you be aware of the rules BEFORE invading a country? Thus precluding bitching about any unpleasant “surprise” laws?

        5. “Whites didn’t “take control” of anything, South Africa–the area settled by Brits and Boers–was EMPTY until the whites built something worth taking over.

          They apparently took a 400-year “vacation” then expected to come back and claim the land again? ”

          I’m not sure what you’re not getting. I never said SA blacks were claiming/had rights to land they had abandoned.

          The cape region (the part Bantus had probably not settled) was not technically empty, since the Khoisan (Khoi Khoi) lived there and had for quite some time.
          The map you posted shows the region at an earlier time before the spread of white influence/rule further beyond the cape area, before the conquest (by the Europeans) of the major black groups (and their traditional lands) such as Zulu, Xhosa, Tswana, etc. that form the country’s black population (and thus I do not see its relevance as a response). The expansion, acquiring/conquering black tribes and their lands (e.g.:in the the Xhosa wars and Anglo-Zulu Wars of the 1870’s-80s,) created an enlarged cape colony, whose territory would form the South African state.

          The later range of the colony:

          https://www.google.com/search?q=south+africa+colony&biw=905&bih=774&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM4LjXteLJAhVL4SYKHfq4ByMQ_AUICCgD#imgrc=HOLzHhZOy_YzRM%3A

          The major black groups of the south African territory came under White rule(lasting for most, about from the late1800’s to the end of apartheid) because their lands were added by conquest/expansion (this being the nature of a conquering expansion) to the European settler state (which would later establish Apartheid over the same territory) .
          The way S.A. black tribes(such as the Zulu and Xhosa) once conquered, lived under white rule in their traditional lands. Migration to a white state from somewhere else, was not responsible.

          map of traditional tribal/ethnic lands

          http://www.south-africa-tours-and-travel.com/bantu.html

          1. In 1515 a the Portuguese king recognised the cot of arms of a savage king in the zambezi plateu called mutapa, thats a good 100 years before Van riebek established the cape of good hope, 200 years before the british annexed cape colony, causing the boer trek which happened during the same time of Shaka’s mfecane,
            300 years before the end of the anglo-boer war and almost 400 years before the South Africa Act which resulted in the Union of South Africa and the Rudd concession which resulted in rhodes annexation of what would later on become Zimbabwe
            And no i don’t need to give you links to documentaries or shady websites because this is official

        6. Edit: S.A. black tribes(such as the Zulu and Xhosa) and their lands were placed under white rule by conquests/invasions. Black migrations to a white state from somewhere else, was not responsible.

        7. The Zulu INVADED white-held areas. That led to wars, sometimes the whites won, sometimes lost. But nonwhites keep invading white-held areas, either to steal a Better Life or because they think it’ll be easy to overthrow/conquer. Which is it?

      2. Whether one patronizes whores is indeed a choice. I didn’t think that needed saying.

        It is well established from archaeology and linguistics that some ethno-linguistic branches of the (south)eastern Bantu settled of (what is now south Africa by about 1300 ad. They settled the the large northernly region called the Transvaall by about 3-400 ad. Kwa Zulu Natal was settled by (probably proto-Nguni speakers by 1300. Early Sotho-Tswana tribes had expanded eastward in the preceding centuries and inhabited the Highveld. Only the South end, now the cape province, might be considered without Bantu, with mostly/only Khoisan groups, when Europeans first came.
        When whites took control of (what is now) south Africa,its population was mostly made up of blacks, who had lived there (or in large parts of the territory) several centuries before the European communities(which mostly began at the cape, settling in the Central-North regions later). The mass of blacks, composed mainly of regionally distinct and long established cultures, could not realistically evade the White-ruled south African state, that included their lands . (Exceptionally, some small and/or isolated tribes, namely the mountain Basotho and the Tiny Swazi kingdom, kept a greater autonomy.)

        On archaeology:

        http://www.saimm.co.za/Journal/v074n06p211.pdf

        http://uctscholar.uct.ac.za/PDF/102065_Warren_KA.pdf

        1. Whites didn’t “take control” of anything, South Africa–the area settled by Brits and Boers–was EMPTY until the whites built something worth taking over.

          They apparently took a 400-year “vacation” then expected to come back and claim the land again? You don’t get to say “It USED to be mine, so it’s mine again”. I have been through 30 houses, and I can’t come back to any of them and say that without a fairly good chance of getting beaten or shot.
          That’s why the savages overthrew the country with a bombing campaign.
          Start by looking up the Church Street Bombing.

          Why couldn’t they “evade”? Staying out of the land of people who “oppress” you should be a survival skill. Kinda like they stayed away from the Zulu’s “Knocking” (A genocidal purge–and I mean genocide as in no survivors, not just using the word for shock-value!) So they knocked on the whites’ gates, “Let us in, the Zulus will kill us!” And the whites were stupid enough to let them in!
          https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Shaka's_Empire_map.svg/2031px-Shaka's_Empire_map.svg.png

          It seems like they came in to take advantage of the Better Life the whites made possible…Then didn’t want to obey the whites’ rules…Why is that nonwhites keep doing that?

  29. quote by ep-gah

    Yes, we should stop feeding and medicating the savages that kill us, overthrown our countries, then try to invade the countries they haven’t overthrown yet, presumably to repeat the process.
    No other organism feeds its predators! Some even evolve to poison their predators or otherwise inconvenience/kill them. Why should we do differently?

    Maybe ep-gah should apply his own “Darwinian tough love” to white people. No more coddling for the white westerners. None. See how that will affect society. No more medication, easy food etc.. It’s all the jungle baby.

    1. That would be whites giving up white civilization.
      Savages are the ones trying to overthrow or destroy white civilization but keep the benefits.
      MOST whites do not want to go back to the jungle, “baby”, that’s why whites try to keep the riffraff OUT!

  30. quote by ep-gah

    Wow, really? You or some white you know took a 50-on-one beating for doing too well in work or school?
    If not, then please return to topic: Blacks behave worse than whites.
    Whites may INSULT you for doing better than them, but not BEAT YOU DOWN for it!

    You must be speaking of a really bad neighborhood. Neighborhoods of blacks would vary, just as white ones would. The more ghetto or “full of fatherless kids” it is, then the meaner it would be. Best advice would be for smarter blacks to leave.

    My guess the black ghetto types are jealous, and then combined with a tendency toward violence which has no repression, you’d see a beating. However, jealousy and dislike of what some see as “brown-noses” exists in all cultures. However, in many the least you’d hear is a lot of insulting.

    1. I’m not talking about the damn NEIGHBORHOOD. I’m talking about the SCHOOL. The beatdown took place at the SCHOOL.
      And yes, the fact that the SCHOOL did not control the savages is deplorable. Did you not click the link?

      1. Kids are a_holes in almost any kind of ethnic neighborhood, especially in the middle school years. They bully beyond comprehension. The school usually does nothing, and the punishments are weak. It’s a problem all over the US and in other nations.

        1. In response to ep-gah. Yes, kids are that pathogenic. They call people names, they throw paper-wads, spit-wads. They drive other kids to commit suicide. All this is true, regardless of race.

          Of course, going from doing the negative things I mentioned into doing an actual beating could be influenced by being in the company of ghetto blacks.

        2. quote

          That’s not what I said. I said BLACKS did a 50-on-1 beating!
          Now your excuse is “All Kids Do That”?
          Then show me a link, or SOME kind of proof.

          Robert himself wrote an article on how Blacks are WAY more pathogenic than whites!
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/11/24/why-race-is-important/

          Other groups are pathogenic and I’d say whites are also pathogenic. Human beings, regardless of race are pack animals.

          In Asia, from what I saw there, if you make Koreans mad then they all (most of them) will start mouthing off to you, making you feel unwelcome. Also, in America, as I saw at a community college I went to, and also in middle school, that once you become “uncool” then everybody also mouths off to you and makes you feel unwelcome.

          So with blacks it crosses over to beatings, but how do you know it wouldn’t with other groups? Maybe cause people are afraid of punishment. I do know that in prison gangs of any race will kick your ass.

  31. quote by epgah

    If I told you Detroit in the 1950s, a 9-year-old girl could walk down any street unarmed and unharmed, would you accuse me of being high, or would you treat it as a matter of recorded history?

    If the latter, what changed? Maybe the 5 Corrupt Black Mayors?
    Maybe the abolition of STRESS Units, and replacing the normal cops with Black thugs in uniform who would either turn a brown eye to the mayhem, or offer to help–THE THUGS? Maybe a week-long riot in 1967 that scared off all legit businesses, the whites that depended on them for jobs, and even blacks who DIDN’T want to be part of the permanent crime-wave!

    It probably coincided with the fact that jobs were leaving Detroit. Of course, in later years, the “job leaving” got even worse, with greedy CEOs outsourcing all work to third world sweatshops.

    1. The jobs left because of the violence.
      When your shop gets robbed repeatedly, capped off with burning it down, you get the feeling you’re not wanted there and you leave.

      Whites follow the jobs.
      Nonwhites follow the whites.
      Thankfully, Detroit’s suburbs kept as much of the shit as they could in Detroit. Compare and contrast with Chicago’s suburbs.
      Who could possibly have predicted that keeping bad people out of an area makes it safer and “better”? How did they figure it out? SimCity didn’t come out until 1989!

  32. quote by musha-washa

    What does ‘civilise’ mean?
    Jim crow, slavery, lynching, raping, burning people alive, calling humans apes, doing monkey chants?

    Good one mush-awasha. Nobody likes to be treated like that. So ep-gah is saying that’s civilization. It would be interesting to turn the tables and put white rednecks in some place where they are treated like that. And of course, the bullies will justify thier actions, calling it “civlization”, or “What are you a wimp or something? Can’t you take it?” 🙄

    1. Noone wants to be treated like that, but as I wrote, that’s the same thing savages did to their white hosts in South Africa.

      If you act like an enemy, expect whites or anyone else to TREAT you like an enemy. Do you deny this, Jason?

      Blacks, especially nowadays, act like fucking Orcs. So why shouldn’t their hosts act like Aragorn?

  33. quote by ep-gah

    During that time it was. You’re committing the CARDINAL sin of history, which is trying to shoehorn modern laws and ways of thinking into back then.

    Geronimo was a War Criminal, but we treated it like any other enemy. Think about that.

    Now read this carefully:
    BACK THEN, slavery was LEGAL.
    People paid a lot of MONEY for them.
    Only the richest could afford them.
    Ironically, the biggest slaveowners were freed Blacks themselves!
    The irony of that flattens you, right?

    What is the most expensive thing you own? Would you like someone to just TAKE it from you?

    Well, slavery might not have been evil, considering the historical time period, but abuse is always wrong. Definitely, the slaves in Haiti were massively abused.

    Considering the abuse, that alone would be enough to destroy the slaveowners property rights. For instance, in our own day, kids that abused are taken away from natural parents.

    1. Yes, and there was a slave “review board” that took slaves away from abusive owners. But that was NOT your original argument, was it?
      YOU tried to say SLAVERY ITSELF was “wrong”!

      Hell, savages NOWADAYS still practice slavery. Only whites abolished it.
      Does that make us more moral, or does that make us CHUMPS?

      1. quote by ep-gah

        Hell, savages NOWADAYS still practice slavery. Only whites abolished it.
        Does that make us more moral, or does that make us CHUMPS?

        Most non-whites don’t practice slavery nowadays, only isolated groups in places like the Sudan.

        However, though, in poor third world nations, people can often be in a “slave like” situation becuse economically they are very weak. In fact, most of them would volunteer for a “servant” position for the rich, anything to escape poverty, even if it came with bad conditions.

    2. BTW, what exactly is “wrong” with slavery? Do or do not Blacks seek/DEMAND “free” food/housing/clothes/CARS in some States? Should they not be made to work for it? That’s what slavery was!

      And if you think about it, when they get all that WITHOUT working, WE are THEIR slaves!

      1. Well gosh ep-gah, basically your saying that “working” itself is always slavery, cause work is what allows people to enjoy life. Of course though, free workers are not beaten with whips.

        Well, anyhow, Marx argued the same thing in his writings. The working man was essentially a slave because without work he would starve to death, even though he wouldn’t get an actual bullwhip on his back.

        1. Working is not slavery. The question is, does it benefit you?

          Yes, you’re a slave to your biological desires/impulses. That’s from what, ULTRON? If we could evolve not to need food, (Ignoring the ATP chain, pretending that’s biologically even POSSIBLE!) we could evolve not to work…BUT what good is that? Do you really want humanity to become a bunch of lazy bastards?
          If we were all that lazy, no advancement would ever have taken place, so you wouldn’t have TV or videogames to enjoy, you’d die of boredom.

          The good news is, because noone wants to work, there would be no doctors or pills extending your boring life. The bad news is, you wouldn’t live long enough to get bored. “Nasty, Brutish, and Short”–Name That Quote!

  34. musha-washa is injecting too much black nationalism into the debate, while ep-gah, obviously, is doing the same with white nationalism.

    We can say that the environment and impact of foreign oppression has taken it’s toll on black people, but we can also say some things are the result of free will choice on the part of blacks.

    Yes, colonialsm and the modern way has helped blacks, but this introduction of the modern way has also came with massive abuse. We can say the same thing holds true among anywhere else the Europeans colonized.

    You can’t justify abuse by saying “We did you a favor.” For instance, it’s true kids are provided with many things by parents, but it does not give the parents the right to abuse. Likewise, If aliens came to Earth and helped out mankind, that would be great, but not if it goes hand to hand with abuse.

    1. Can we also say the same wherever savages overthrew white civilization, starting with the Moslem “Moors” colonizing Europe after the fall of Rome?

      Also where do you draw the line of “abuse”? If the savages are violent, is whatever Level of force necessary to stop that violence “abuse” or merely PUNISHMENT? Parents can no longer discipline their kids because people like you call it ABUSE!

      1. Muslim Moors are not sub-saharan Africans. Anyhow, I know that Muslims enslaved and brutalized people. The slavery they practiced with sub-saharan Africans was far worse than what Europeans did.

        1. OK, great, I somehow got you to admit that. BUT will you admit the same thing about the savages that overthrew white countries treating whites worse than the whites ever treated them? Admitting the countries are worse is one thing, admitting the savages are worse to their betters is quite another.

          Start with South Africa. Did you follow ANY of the links I gave you about it yet?

      2. Also where do you draw the line of “abuse”? If the savages are violent, is whatever Level of force necessary to stop that violence “abuse” or merely PUNISHMENT? Parents can no longer discipline their kids because people like you call it ABUSE!

        Perhaps the slaves would have been less violent if they had been treated well from the beginning. I assume in Haiti that wasn’t the case.

        1. As far as actual abuse goes, as far as kids are concerned, and I guess you could expand it to slaves, we can see what is abuse and what is punishment very clearly.

          Of course, in an actual slavery situation it would be wise to use positive reinforcement first before negative stuff. You would want a “so so” good relationship with the slaves. It would be like how a prison might make consessions to the prisoners.

        2. Note, normally kids who are raised well from the start need less severe whippings than brats who had never been punished in their life.

        3. No, your last paragraph is the right one. Kids who were raised well from the start need less punishment than brats who never been punished in their life.

          But Haiti did something dumber: They imported WAY more savages than they could control. If a human with a whip can control can control X savages, and one with a gun can control 10X savages, importing 100X savages is Really STUPID!

          Savages are like very VIOLENT kids. They can easily overpower an adult or small groups of adults if they outnumber their prey enough.
          Look up a John Wayne movie “Cowboys” where this concept of children outnumbering and overpowering adults was put to POSITIVE use.
          Or pick your favorite zombie movie for a closer example of how it feels to be outnumbered and overpowered by savages.

          Did you look up Susan Dlott yet? A FEDERAL JUDGE who FIGHTS AGAINST RACIAL PROFILING, thinking Blacks are “unfairly” targeted–and the thugs STILL attacked her! She called 911 and reported 3 BLACK thugs threw her husband down the stairs! (When the chips are down and their OWN lives or loved ones are on the lines, even the biggest “anti-racists” can admit Blacks are the problem! Miraculous, if hypocritical, don’t you think?)
          Afterwards, two-faced “Civil Rights” types said they nearly LOST a great ally! Lost? No, you LOSE a comb or a pair of scissors, or your keys, they nearly MURDERED their own ally. That’s how feral savages are!

      1. Sorry, but yes I agree with that statement. I only said that cause you made some statement where you said Africa would have been better off if whites had never invaded with all thier advanced technology etc..

        1. Well im not a nationalist, i think of myself as a logicist and i understand the damage that concrete, glass, plastics, rubbers , factories etc africans were living in pefect hamony with the environment which is the biggest challenge in engineering today, creating designs that has the least possible effect on the environment

        2. Hey, what about turning the Sahara FOREST into the Sahara DESERT?
          Perfect harmony with the environment is impossible, especially if the savages were developing technologically even WITHOUT civilization!

          If you want to pretend they had great structures, where did they get the materials for that?
          What about smelting? It pollutes, and you have to skim off the slag. What are you gonna do with that?
          And of course, the savages OWN waste is a problem, especially with their mega-breeding!

          1. The sahara is a desert because air masses in the northern hemisphere move from north-east to south west , so there is a big landmass between the ocean (where most rain come from) and the sahara. Kindergarten geography

      2. Yes, and you’re a Black Nationalist, claiming the savages were better off.
        If you really care about the environment, get savages to stop using cars, and stop building factories. (Good luck with that!)
        Savages, however, do not give the expletive of your choice about the environment as long as they get PAID! It’s true in Africa, Brazil, China, India…

        You want the benefits without whites in control? You got it! Now you bitch about pollution, but it’s actually because only whites really care about the environment… AND THOSE WHITES ARE NO LONGER IN CONTROL! Your Wish, Majesty!

        Say it with me: Savages are not peaceful, it has to be forced on them.
        Savages are not eco-friendly.

        http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n3p-7_Beary.html
        Read this article. Savages were not called that for cadence in Disney film.

        1. quote by ep-gah

          2000 years ago Romans had working sewage systems. today Indians don’t even know how to bury their shit. I think that pretty much says it all as to comparing civilized to savages and their environmental impact!

          Upper class Indians have advanced toilet systems. They simply allow the lower classes to wallow in garbage, much as Brazil does the same with it’s poor nieghborhoods. At least in the USA, the projects have toilet systems, but beyond that, they’re pretty dangerous places.

        2. Actually savages polute less, thats why there are no black forests in africa, or those pollution smog that happens in china and india, same thing used to happen in Detroit
          The only hole in the ozone layer is above US/Canada/Uk
          While discovery channel might make you think its savages, its actually the civilised people

          Black Nationalist think that white people are inherently evil,
          I dont think whites are evil
          I just know that they just as stupid as blacks

        3. OK, then why are our countries successful and peaceful?
          Why are whites the great inventors who HAVE to provide plumbing for the savages?
          Why are white countries peaceful, and when savages take over, they become Superjail outtakes?

          Also, you might want to Google “Africa Pollution”, forests aren’t what you’re polluting…

        4. The projects are only dangerous because of the savages within them, NOT because of structural unsoundness.
          Once again, poor Blacks are more violent than poor whites. If it’s not due to IQ, then WHAT? Is there some magic on whites that makes us mostly peaceful, that makes our countries safe, wonderful places where savages WANT to invade, and don’t get killed when they do? (Even when they kill US!)

        5. No, it’s because WE KNOW WHAT WE’RE DOING!
          You even stole our countries and couldn’t keep them running!
          You conquer them and turn them to shit!
          From Detroit to Haiti to South Africa!

  35. In response to South African ethnic conflict, that’s the way it is anywhere in the world. When I was in Korea, Koreans were jealous of American power and resentful of the US military bases. So they gave anyone who they thought was American a hard time.

    They would bring up shit like “colony” or “Bin Laden” or “9/11”, anything to be “punk” and insult the American.

    So in South Africa, it’s much the same. I’m sure it was the “in thing” to be proud to be black, and so that made the whites a target, especially if the whites were unwilling to be “puppets” of the blacks.

    Note, this stuff can fan up into a bigger problem if the white person cheats the non-whites or abuses them somehow. But even without that stuff, they’re always angry, and there will be a few that will start stuff.

    Of course, with whites, it’s also the same thing. As I said with the community college thing, whites are pack animals, if they think your gay or a brown-noser, then they start mouthing off to you, glaring at you. They start developing an “us vs them mentality” and your ass is the target. 🙄

    1. Oh I and I mentioned the island of Tinian (a US commenwealth) in the Pacific) where everyone on the island hates one family, a family which owns everything on the island. I find that situation amusing, cause it shows how human beings have to “hate something” no matter where they are.

    2. OK, what white country do they chop up nonwhites?
      For that matter, what other countries does it go beyond mouthing off/glaring at you to scenes from HOSTEL?

      1. A lot of times white, northeast asian people would like to torture you, but they can’t cause it’s illegal, so they do everything short of it. Being a hated American during the Bush years I know all about it.

        1. As far as Euro torture goes, well actually, there are plenty of tales of Russians torturing Christian missionaries etc.. Those people are white. Also, according to some historians, the Nazis did medical experiments on people.

          The Middle Ages was full of all kinds of torture at the hands of whites and also Roman times.

        2. Yes, but in northeast Asian countries, either their own cops will stop them if they throw more than bad words, or you are allowed to fight back.

          Now please answer my question. In South Africa, savages chop up whites. I can link you pictures or you can search for yourself.
          What countries do whites chop up savages? Or is the aggression one-way, and NOT the good one?

        3. Well, until Putin, Russia was an honorary nonwhite. Where do you think the Black Panthers, PLA, IRA, and ANC (Savages overthrowing South Africa) got their weapons?

          And are you really trying to compare the Inquisition and WWII to now? Because we did it back then, it’s OK for savages to do it now?
          THAT is the argument you’re going to go with?

          If you really believe that, then we should resume WWII with the savages taking the Nazi’s role, right?

  36. “Start with South Africa. Did you follow ANY of the links I gave you about it yet?”

    The Boer shouldn’t have been there in the first place.

    Remember: Europe for the Europeans, Africa for the Africans, South America for the South Americans, and Asia for the Asians.

    1. That whole idea is baloney. A group with superior weapons, a better immune system (most of all) among other things will always take over an area. Actually, that’s just the way nature operates, I’m not even complaining about it.

      The South African experiment was doomed to fail cause the Boers didn’t have better immune systems than the blacks, only superior weapons and technology. Ultimately, the Boers have to concede that they’re going to have to allow the blacks to be the master (as the blacks are the majority) or leave.

      1. Maybe there were few blacks when the Boers settled, but because South Africa is so close geographically to the rest of Africa, it was inevitable that blacks from the north would come in. Eventually, the Boers would have to become a minority.

        1. I think the biggest problem with Boers is they’re Boering (boring). 😆

          Get a few jokes going on, and you might get South Africa back.

        2. If that’s true, whites are going to be the majority in ALL white countries. We pay for the savages to outbreed us, then once they’re the majority, they take over the country.

          America is only 60% American now, by the last Census…

        3. This notion of black invasions are just wishful thinking from nationalist
          When SouthAfica and all other black nations were built, white people relied on black labour who they forced to work by using the tax system,
          Unfortunately i didn’t study South African history that much to know the actual Acts, but in Zimbabwe were im from they introduced hut tax (a one room pole and dagga primitive hut had to pay tax, not just the land but every hut), cattle tax, dog tax, head tax (every savage paid tax so if you had 10 wives and 100 children which was normal at the time, you paid 111times more than a single savage i say savage because this only applied to africans) and the land husbandry act, which simply stated that all fertile grazing lands and all good farming land belonged to whites, and africans were moved to unproductive lands,
          And still savages resisted working for whites at first by simply selling their livestock to pay tax, until they got too poor and had no choice but to go and work. Yet they resisted enough (in the first dacades) that the whites were forced to import labour by PAYING immigrants to come from nations that had already been broken such as Mozambique, Zambia, Malawi, and India
          Do you know that Durban in South Africa has the has the highest population of indians in any city thats not in India, in the World, and no they did not invade South Africa, Union of South Africa government paid them and paid for their travel to South Africa

        4. Yes, I DO know about South Africa importing people from INDIA. But the people from INDIA did not blow up anything, murder anyone, or takeover the country!

          Why shouldn’t people have the best land in their own country? Whites built the country, not the savages.

          But the big question is: Why did Blacks come IN instead of FLEE if they were so badly treated? Have you ever heard of the Berlin Wall? Barbed wire, machinegun nests, the actual wall, and a network of informants from your wildest dreams were not enough to keep people INSIDE!

          Why did savages cheat the system? Did they not figure out that would hurt them eventually? Why move into a place, then resist the law?

          1. I was using the example of indians to show that white people ‘ built ‘ african countries using black labour and in the case of south africa which was growing faster than they could cope they had to get extra labour from India
            Point being IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR WHITES TO ‘ BUIT’ BY THEMSELVES they simply didn’t have the labour so they forced people they had subjugate into labour using atrocious laws that only affected natives
            Again lemme reiterate SAVAGES DID NOT INVADE WHITE TOWNS IN AFRICA, THEY WERE FORCED INTO THEM
            and you cant say ‘why didn’t they flee’
            Flee to where when you good folks had colonised the whole fucking continent?

        5. That sounds like the lack of Big Picture intelligence from the top of the article!

          Also, Moslems are invading Europe right now, and America is getting overrun by Moslems, Mexicans, and ungrateful Blacks who “hate” it here, but not enough to actually LEAVE!

        6. I know about the tax system. It sounds like the tax system was setup to punish polygyny and encourage assimilation. Is that “bad” to you too?

          It also sounds like some of the “fair” tax proposals floating around America nowadays! Get taxed on what you USE, High Rollers get soaked, minimalists like me get away Scot-free (In this case, literally, look up the meaning of the phrase!). I can’t imagine why it keeps getting defeated…
          Probably because it would soak Saudi multibillionaires, who buy extra houses just to store sports cars in them?

          1. It was built to force people to work because they couldn’t make it without black labour and black produce until they could understand the land

        7. Whites set aside “Homelands”. Just like the Reservations for the savages here.

          But why takeover our country?
          And if you’re our equals, why can’t you keep it running after stealing it?
          Or did you savages break it intentionally?
          THAT’S why you can’t have nice things!

          Either way, give us back our countries, and stay in the reservations, or don’t bitch about rules we set up.
          Tell the truth: Savages came in because they saw “Economic Opportunity”, right? Otherwise, no amount of incentive would’ve drawn them in.
          Also, you contradicted yourself: First you say we couldn’t build it, then you say it was growing faster than we could handle. Which is it?

          I think whites could’ve built it, it would’ve just been slower. Orania proves this. Whites BOUGHT BACK land from the savage thieves and built an all-white country! Essentially, whites are on the Reservation in their own country, and paying the savages for the “privilege”!

        8. Parts of the continent we didn’t civilize. Take another look at that map.
          Why didn’t the Bantu stay and fight the Zulu instead of invade and fight US?

          1. Zulus are in south africa which was boers republic of south africa, so yo cant invade kwazulu-natal without invading SA, in the same way that i cant invade DC without invading the US

        9. quote by ep-gah

          You’re saying they HAD to let in all comers, they couldn’t/shouldn’t have defended their borders?

          Ok, if were going to use that logic, then the Amerindians should have defended their borders, but they couldn’t cause they were too weak.

          Anyhow logically speaking, and I’m even somewhat Amerindian myself saying this, there was no way to stop the influx of Europeans coming in.

        10. That’s a good point, BUT historically, the Wampanoags fed us, got us to fight their bullies, then tried to kill US when their bullies were gone.
          If we can beat their bullies, we can beat them, and we proved it to them.

          BUT the fact remains: The savages fought the civilized.
          Why are the civilized NOT fighting the savages? At the very least, send the savages invading NOW some poison arrows, like the savages did us 400 years ago. At best, raise the BAR…or at least a Maxim.
          We can argue WHAT weapons to use, but let’s start fighting back first!

        11. No, they weren’t, look at the map again. It’s more like invading Mexico without invading America.

          Either way, why don’t the savages give back what they stole (Well, the property, they can’t restore life, obviously), and either leave the country or THEY stay on the Reservations.

          The Zulus came from outside, they weren’t forced into the country.

    2. Right, how do you explain all the Blacks, South Americans, etc. in America, and all the Moslem Terrorists in ANY European country?

      1. They’re not savages, they’re just humble farmers driven off thier land by guess who? The USA and it’s greedy companies.

        Ok, you could say some Mexican gangs are savages, but for the most part the people coming in are very ordinary latinos.

        1. The US and it’s companies are fucking Latin America before Latin Americans come and fuck us. That’s for sure. What about NAFTA among many other things?

        2. Yes, but we’re not a new country that NEEDS more people. We’ve got what, a 20% unemployment rate? So we should keep out all but the absolute most EXTRAORDINARY! A or S rank in whatever field we need, right?

          Also, Mexican gangs are NOT an AAEO operation, they ONLY hire Mexicans, so if we keep Mexicans out, we’ll have ZERO Mexican gangs too, right? Double Bonus?

          And if we let them IN, we get shit like that Mexican Moslem who was a straw buyer for the San Bernadino terrorists, if not the third shooter.

          NAFTA was something they agreed to, so they must’ve wanted it. Why didn’t they tell us “Make Me”, like they do with our border? Even though we keep sending them BILLIONS, it’s not enough until they turn our country into theirs.

          If I wanted to live in Mexico, you have my Word, Wild Mexicans couldn’t stop me. I do not. I want even LESS for them to turn America INTO Mexico.
          What’s the use of fleeing if they’re just going to turn their new host into the same Hell they fled?

  37. quote by ep-gah

    Wow, even you are finally admitting ghetto Blacks are worse. This is a true Red-Letter Day!

    I have never defended ghetto blacks, only expressed some sadness for them as thier situation came from one parent homes.

    However, white nationalists want to viscously attack “all blacks” as oppposed to ghetto blacks.

    1. Ghetto blacks are just victims of their society, there is a reason why nationalists always pic south africa out of fifty-something countries in africa, thats because the vast majority of them do not rampant crime, out of south africa, nigeria, botswana, rape and murder are almost unheard of in sub sahara

      1. Well, South Africa, Rhodesia, Zaire (Now CONGO) were OVERTHROWN by Black savages. In almost anyone’s mind, that’s a little worse than a “little rape and murder” or whatever. South Africa has become the Rape Capital of the WORLD!

        You shouldn’t talk so much about Nigeria. It’s the only country in the WORLD that has a scam named after it–or has become infamous for Internet scamming at all, for that matter. Worse, Nigeria has started a maritime piracy racket. Guess they got jealous of Somalia having all the fun?

        1. So Romans aren’t Europeans in your mind? What does that make Romans, then, Space Aliens?

          And when the Goths destroyed Rome, the parasitic Moors came in.
          Some claim the Moors “civilized” Europe, but if that were true, people like you would be grateful, rather than bitching, when the Civilized World repaid the favor.
          Whites were slaves of savages for 700 years. They “tolerated” us as long as we paid our Jizya, or EXISTENCE TAX! That’s not tolerance, that’s extortion!

          Being conquered like that kickstarted European aggression. The only way to not have That happen again, is to conquer savages before they conquer us. Maybe we had it too good too long, and that’s why we got complacent and the savages did it to us again?

          People who are ignorant of their past will defile their present and destroy their future. Posterity must honor above all earthly things, those who have given their lives or freedom for the preservation of the folk.

          1. Not back then, they saw themselves as people and you as savage, if you called them say english the’d be deeply insulted
            But thats not the point, the point is its not just niggas who revolted and overthrew their oppressors, superior arians did as well

        2. Well, if you really want to go there, then the point is when there is a successful revolt against a better culture, a lesser one takes over.
          In Europe’s case, the Moors.

          In South Africa’s case, the savages. Even though they stole the whole country, they couldn’t even MAINTAIN it at the Level the whites had.

          Same with the Goths, with the worse side-effect that the Moors and their supporters in THIS era brag that the terrorists “brought civilization and baths”…No, they rebuilt what the Romans had already built, then tried to claim credit for it.

          The savages of South Africa started the overthrow by blowing up a bank. Did they ever rebuild it? If so, did the SAVAGES build a bank? Or just rebuild what their betters already had?

          And if you look up how the Goths behaved, “savage” would be a perfect word. Primitive and violent.

        3. Let’s see…15 years ago? Is the savages’ murder of their betters ever going to stop, or why are you asking? Ever since the savages took over, it’s getting worse.

          Hint: supremacism is about ruling over others, survivalism is about staying alive. If a group is worried about its disappearance due to mass-immigration and miscegenation, even outright violence, then they are survivalists and not supremacists. Falsely accusing them of supremacism raises the suspicion that you don’t want them to survive.

    2. Well, even if you say “some” Blacks are bad, the rest gather around them and DEFEND them, rather than put them down for us.

      White thugs get killed, I lead the nation in a slow-clap.
      Black thugs get killed, other Blacks riot.

      And it goes to the national scale too. When Hitler stepped out of line, the rest of the whites put him back down.
      When Mandela/Mugabe/Zuma got out of line, the rest of the Blacks helped them. When the President of Sudan got indicted by the ICC, Mugabe’s thugs protected it from justice.
      See the difference yet?

      Whether you’re “sad” over it or not, it needs to be punished!

        1. Because breeding is considered a “right” even for ghetto thugs?
          Or perhaps especially for ghetto thugs?

          As long as they can keep breeding, no matter how wrong their methods are socially, morally, even LEGALLY, if they can keep breeding, that’s all that counts.

        2. To be glib, I hate it when SJWs talk about correcting society to HELP savages. Society needs to CORRECT the savages, not vice-versa!

  38. The concept of “equality” is declared a lie by every evidence of Nature. It is a search for the lowest common denominator, and its pursuit will destroy every superior race, nation, or culture. In order for a plow horse to run as fast as a race horse you would first have to cripple the race horse. Conversely, in order for a race horse to pull as much as a plow horse, you would first have to cripple the plow horse.

    In either case, the pursuit of equality is the destruction of excellence.

    1. Some are better than others at certain things. Each has his own unique talent, but there is no need to be an ASS about it. It’s all about good sportsmanship etc.., stuff you might learn playing sports as a kid.

      1. Why would I say that? Cause white nationalists are obsessed with superiority, where it trumps (no pun intended) everything else, stuff like morality, justice, etc… Superiority isn’t everything. What about humility for a change? How about humility even 10 percent of the time?

        Most places are about being humble. For instance, one reason drill instructors are harsh to recruits is to make them humble. Also, a typical student everyone hates in school is one that’s arrogant, and to an extent it could be justified.

        1. What are Blacks better at?

          And on your point about arrogance, how is it “arrogance” to claim you’re better when you’re an A student in a roomful of Ds?
          YOUR house is the one the savages keep wanting to invade, and while there, they steal or break EVERYTHING, and don’t even take their shoes off!

          http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/17/migrants-storm-channel-tunnel-armed-iron-bars-hammers
          Where’s the good sportsmanship, humility, morality, or justice in that?

        2. Great! When are we going to humble the Third World savages and make them understand their ways are wrong?

          You know what my math teacher told me the hardest part of teaching a kid 2+2=4 is?
          Teaching them it’s NOT 5!

    2. Note even Marx said “Each according to his own ability,” It’s not about making everything equal, but letting all talent have a chance to shine on an equal field. For instance, you could have the greatest musician in the world, in some oppressive situation where you’d never even know he existed.

    3. Also note a lot of times talent isn’t developed cause nobody takes an interest in helping anyone. For instance, how would some low caste Indian, or lower class Brazillian ever develop thier talent given a massive lack of resources?

        1. Savages are robbing and murdering their betters, especially whites.
          What better definition or demonstration of “enemy” could there possibly be?

          Did you read those rape stats I linked and summarized for you last week, or were they against your narrative?

  39. quote by ep-gah

    What are Blacks better at?

    And on your point about arrogance, how is it “arrogance” to claim you’re better when you’re an A student in a roomful of Ds?
    YOUR house is the one the savages keep wanting to invade, and while there, they steal or break EVERYTHING, and don’t even take their shoes off!

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/17/migrants-storm-channel-tunnel-armed-iron-bars-hammers
    Where’s the good sportsmanship, humility, morality, or justice in that?

    Blacks are good at all sorts of things, generally speaking, music, sports etc..

    Your making huge generalizations of non-whites saying they want to invade like hostle space aliens on some sci-fi movie.

    Also, remember, often they’re invading cause US companies etc.. fucked them to start with, taking thier land, jobs etc…

    1. It’s not a “generalization”, and they ARE acting like Orcs, if not hostile aliens.

      Can you name a nonwhite country with a POSITIVE NET IMMIGRATION RATE?
      And I already posted the link where the scum were attacking the English with bars and hammers, right? Are you going to deny the attackers are Black? Or their attack earns the appellation “savage”?

      If our companies go to their country, they’re GETTING jobs without the risk or stress of having to invade our country. So what’s the problem exactly?

      1. The companies are stealing land to make “mega-farms”. They’re destroying farmers by sending in cheap US imports.

        1. How are they stealing land? You mean BUYING it, right? Offering more for the land than the savages can afford?

          If they STEAL land, that would leave a big hole, and we could toss all misbehaving Third Worlders into it, right?

    2. I’ll completely recant the invasion part if you can name ONE COUNTRY that whites built that nonwhites stayed out of. COUNTRY, not city. I know you were thinking Orania.

      Actually, that’s too difficult. How about a country where nonwhites behave themselves instead of either attacking us DIRECTLY or constantly demanding changes to the law that hurt us and benefit the invaders?

      1. After the 1965 act, non whites were staying out of the US generally speaking, except for some random groups (like Chinese setting up restaurants etc..). The big “invasion” happened in the 90s when free trade started to come into play.

        Ok, why was there no Mexican invasion in the 70s or 80s, even though the 1965 immigration act had passed?

    3. Well, too bad music and sports are literally one-in-a-million careers.
      Some get super-rich in it–and blow all the money!

      But what can they do that is actually useful to society?
      And why are the bulk of them a MENACE to society?
      Spike Lee is coming out with a movie “Chiraq”–and trying to play it as comedy! Blacks are PROUD of being violent thugs, so why would they stop?

      1. Music is useful to society. People listen to it everyday, It shapes people’s thoughts, feelings, ideas etc..

        Blacks are PROUD of being violent thugs, so why would they stop?

        So what? Whites like Mafia movies. All sorts of people, though its wrong, love the “dark side of human nature”.

  40. quote by epgah

    What’s the use of fleeing if they’re just going to turn their new host into the same Hell they fled?

    Don’t you get it? Latin America is a hell for the lower classes cause free trade. instigated by the USA, caused it.

    Of course, we don’t need immigration from Latin America, but clearly, it’s a case of a bunch of shit the USA started.

  41. quote by ep-gah

    What’s the use of fleeing if they’re just going to turn their new host into the same Hell they fled?

    Latin America is a hell caused by USA instigated free trade.

    1. Wow, way to dodge a question.

      No, our companies are moving/have moved down there, so they can get our jobs on a silver platter without the annoyance of invading a country that really doesn’t want them. AND their countries must’ve been shit otherwise they never would accept a Free Trade Agreement.

      Now answer the question: Why turn America into the same Hell they fled? Why not just stay in their own shit instead of inflict it on us?

      1. AND their countries must’ve been shit otherwise they never would accept a Free Trade Agreement.

        That’s hilarious.. Maybe the upper classes are shit. You know the ones young fascists in the USA like to glamorize. General Rodriquez Jose De – US Puppet’s government.

        1. Free trade agreements are great for Latin America’s upper classes. Of course, they love them. Of course, if the lower classes don’t like them, the upper classes can just dump them on the US via emigration. Of course, the upper classes would like to see them gone anyway. Ih fact, in a lot of those nations, they actually go out and kill street children.

        2. Why not dump the lower classes on America? According to these idiot upper class Latin Americans, America is the land of opportunity, the never ending “Ellis Island”. Hey at least they’re showing some mercy. The upper classes other option is to kill them like unwanted dogs at a shelter. This whole idea I’m sure is easing their troubled conscience.

        3. Have you ever thought a lot of this dumping might not be idiotic after all? The upper classes don’t want a revolution against them, a communist revolution, so they dump out the lower classes on the US. That’s what I think.

      1. It doesn’t matter whether you think it’s a bad idea. The upper classes in Latin America want free trade, but they have too many lower class people getting fucked by it, so they want to get rid of some of them by promising them a good future in the US.

        If some Mexican is making a huge amount sweeping the floor in the US, then free trade in the Mexico doesn’t matter. He’s getting paid back for the trouble.

        1. We all saw what importing Rice into Haiti did, even Clinton aplogized for it, citing it as a major “fuck up”. Well, that’s what’s going on in Latin America. It’s creating chaos. but the elites can get out of this “dangerous situation” by just dumping people on the US.

        2. GASP Are you admitting Mexico’s upper class–maybe Mexico’s GOVERNMENT (Such as it is) is dumping the shit they don’t want to be bothered with on US? Didn’t you earlier claim they would never do such a thing?

          And yes, an illegal makes 5X more in America–as a criminal–than it would as a citizen in its own country. How is that “paid back for the trouble”? It has nothing to do with free trade. It’s just that that 5X is 1/3 the amount an American would make as Minimum Wage.
          And if it gets hurt, the illegal can fraud the ER. An American is traceable and its property could be taken so the HOSPITAL gets paid back for the trouble! That’s far more important than a foreign criminal, right?

          If Liberals care AT ALL about “income inequality” bullshit, they need to join ranks with Conservatives and shut the borders!

        3. The problem with that “rice into Haiti” thing, is that if we DIDN’T give them cheap food, the poorest savages STARVE. And if we DO, their farmers bitch they can’t make a GOOD profit.

          Why don’t their OWN farmers feed their OWN losers, rather than always demanding WE do, and blaming us when it causes side-effects?

          And always remember: Those scum won’t starve for the Good of their Country, they’ll invade America before they’d let Lord Darwin claim them, right?

  42. quote by ep-gah

    The projects are only dangerous because of the savages within them, NOT because of structural unsoundness.
    Once again, poor Blacks are more violent than poor whites. If it’s not due to IQ, then WHAT? Is there some magic on whites that makes us mostly peaceful, that makes our countries safe, wonderful places where savages WANT to invade, and don’t get killed when they do? (Even when they kill US!)

    The projects are bad cause they are full of grown up “one parent household” children. That’s the magic ingredient making them meaner than poor whites from two parent homes. Also you have to add in the negative effect of Hollywood, rap. poverty etc..

    1. GREAT! How do we stop the savages from breeding OTHER than spaying/neutering them like any other animal that can’t control itself?
      It’s kinda obvious by now they’re not going to stop on their own, right?

      Or do you think they just need a few more DECADES and they’ll just turn around on their own?

      You’re arguably the best example of making excuses instead of making dead savages.

      This seems to be an exclusively white trait, savages have ZERO compunction killing us in their countries or in areas of ours they infest.

      1. Oh yeah? 🙄 What about when Hitler invaded the east to gain “living space” for the German population? Also, the whole thing with Euro settlers coming to North America, Australia etc.. involved a lot of broken treaties etc.., especially when the land was deemed good for farming or gold.

        1. Oklahoma was given to white settlers to punish the five civlized tribes for siding with the Confederacy. But really? Even though it wasn’t a broken treaty, I’m sure the whites REALLY wanted that good farmland. It was just an excellent excuse to take it.

        2. What about when Hitler invaded the rest? The other countries resisted him. Russia even burnt their OWN farms to starve the Nazis!
          Instead, we not only give our invaders food and water — and medical attention to PREVENT them from dying — we even give them free housing because we usually let them stay!

          That is the OPPOSITE of resisting, let alone KILLING, invaders!
          Invaders expect us to feed them because we do. They bitch at US when some die in the desert. Invasion 101 is bring enough food and water to sustain your invasion! I mean really, how stupid is it to expect the country to feed its enemies? And is the country that actually DOES SO more stupid than the invaders that expect it?

          No, the savages broke the treaties in North America. All except, oddly enough, a group in New York! For whatever reason, they held fast to the treaty. Possibly because they saw what happened when savages betrayed us?

          Australia, the whites restricted THEMSELVES from civilizing it. Which is really stupid, because savages want to come into the civilized part and take advantage of the luxuries, PLUS they keep letting in illegals–mostly from terrorist countries. They finally implemented a “Stop The Boats” policy–and they’ve been clear for 7 months! Sometimes it really is that simple! Someone like you would’ve said “It’s a complicated problem”, done nothing, and the problem would continue.

          Keeping illegals out is more important for Australia than even for America, because ¾ of the land is not civilized, which is a mind-boggling waste of land. For comparison, think of trying to cram America’s whole population into the original 13 States.

      2. The strong always take from the weak, no matter what race. What argument do you have here? Your saying whites don’t do that? Of course, I’m not making some whiny plea on behalf of the weak to stop taking it. I’m just stating the facts and the fact of your ridiculous argument.

        1. Whites not only don’t do it, we give TO our enemies!

          Robert had a post a LONG time ago that pointed out the savages were the start of it all:

          “Blacks show up in the civilized, non-White society.

          After a while, they begin engaging in mass uncivilized behavior, the most important of which is that they commit an utterly insane amount of crime.

          Logically, police begin profiling them and whatnot.

          Logically, police begin arresting an incredible number of Black criminals. Why? Because the Blacks are commiting a surreal amount of crime.

          Because cops are arresting a huge portion of the Black population, inevitable excesses result.

          Pretty soon, Blacks begin screaming about “police brutality!”

          Police institute all sorts of sensitivity measures, but Blacks never stop screaming.

          Because an absolutely insane amount of Blacks are being arrested and incarcerated, Blacks complain that “the system ain’t fair – it’s racist.”

          Nowadays, it is probably not even all that true, with some exceptions for very racist areas like the South. In fact, there are studies that show that Blacks are LESS likely to be arrested for crimes and LESS likely to be convicted for the crimes they commit.

          Blacks scream and yell that the system isn’t fair, is racist, bla bla. Even when Black juries convict Blacks, Black cops shoot Black criminals, somehow it all be racist and shit.

          Black juries begin freeing obviously guilty Black criminals, Blacks periodically engage in mass urban riots due to “police brutality”.

          This bullshit goes on forever with no end in sight, ever.

          The whole stupid cycle is caused by one thing: Blacks committing a ridiculous amount of crime in the first place! This is what causes the whole mess.”

        2. Lets just say that it was the same between races, Jason

          “GREAT! How do we stop the savages from breeding OTHER than spaying/neutering them like any other animal that can’t control itself?
          It’s kinda obvious by now they’re not going to stop on their own, right?

          Or do you think they just need a few more DECADES and they’ll just turn around on their own?

          You’re arguably the best example of making excuses instead of making dead savages.

          This seems to be an exclusively white trait, savages have ZERO compunction killing us in their countries or in areas of ours they infest.”

          The fucking point that seems to by passed your head is what’s happening NOW and HERE in this country.

          HOW can it be done? WHAT can we do to make it happen that has given results?

          I’m just going to ignore about how you went from environmental to biological (incest and maternal age) to environment sporadically in the past, what solution could you make from your current environmental hypothesis.

          From the research I’ve been doing, I actually DID come up with something.
          From my research I’ve found that shorter variation of MAOA sequences are correlated with aggression. This is due to Serotonin not be broken down at a high activity due to the shorter sequence, thus increasing estradiol (E2), which has been shown in female monkeys to increase aggressive and dominating behavior. These shorter sequence variance is found at 5.5% in blacks and 0.1% amongst whites and ridiculously low among asians, thus continuing the B_W_A scale as always.

          This would make E2 the hormonal steroid that cause hyperagressiveness amongst blacks, not T. This makes sense since T lowers past the thirties but criminal behavior remains. Afram and African Americans were both found to have higher E2 but lower T due to age.

          This is essentially still Robert’s T theory at play, but with a different hormone that produces a similar affect.

          A POSSIBLE treatment procedure could be finding a method on how to remove old Serotonin or perhaps manipulation to genes for a better sequence or perhaps drugs similar to T drugs

          There’s my science and solution, now show yours.

        3. Well the question to me is do they even WANT to be good?

          Would Blacks accept LEGAL mind-alterant substances instead of the illegal ones they currently consume in order to be good citizens? Or do they want to continue being criminals, and just not get punished for it?

          Look at hucipher or mushawasha on this very blog for proof of the latter.
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/11/24/why-race-is-important/#comment-247245
          This is hucipher’s Magnum Opus, where he blames Black criminality on whites. He cites a “dysfunctional environment” — but claims it’s caused by whites, not Blacks’ own violence, laziness or criminality — ON A THREAD ABOUT THOSE THREE SUBJECTS! He brags that Blacks have a “disdain” for education”, but then claims a “robust education system” could somehow fix them…How? Cattleprods to keep them in?

          Or better yet, let them fail. Protect the ones who want to assimilate, from the ones who don’t! Whether physical walls, or my preference, shooting the bad ones.

          Mushawasha, on the other hand, makes excuses for the savages overthrowing our countries, and blames their current shit status on whites — as in the whites who no longer have control!

        4. Yeah we gotta big problem here and now, as ep-gah suggests. A problem the US created with free trade, a badly designed welfare system which rewards having one parent homes, trashy Hollywood and music industry etc…

          I don’t think there will be a solution to this problem, other than the “final solution” 🙄 The best idea for good minded people would be to leave the chaos of the USA. It may seem weak, but the places is corrupt and evil on all sides.

        5. Phil suggests medication could solve some problems with aggression. In practicality that would never work. The very people who might need to take it would poor and unable to afford it, even if they would take it at all. Also, the main problem is upbringing, mainly one parent homes, a pill might manage the problem, but the better idea is to get rid of the source.

          You know this stuff reminds me of the stupid attempts by doctors to manage ADD etc.. by giving boys pills which turn them into girls etc..

        6. “Phil suggests medication could solve some problems with aggression. In practicality that would never work. The very people who might need to take it would poor and unable to afford it, even if they would take it at all.”

          Jason, first how do you know if they are poor or not? Poverty doesn’t perfectly match with Black criminality. Granted many are likely to be poor, but so are many of the sick in Africa who are receiving treatment. This would likely get funded because, well, it would likely get results for quite a great cause (I mean tax dollars are already being put for welfare so why not something that can benefit Blacks).

          Second,
          “Also, the main problem is upbringing, mainly one parent homes, a pill might manage the problem, but the better idea is to get rid of the source.”

          WTF is this supposed to suggest? A one parent home on an objective level would contribute mostly to availability of resources, social opportunity, and perhaps sadness at most as opposed to INNATE AGGRESSION which is what I’m aiming at.

          Your point would only be relevant if it were the cause of it, but it isn’t. Plus what figures pr studies do you have to support this. Until you actually do that I have no reason to believe you.

          http://racehist.blogspot.com/search?q=MAOA
          http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081406/
          http://conservative-headlines.com/2012/06/does-maoa-gene-make-black-people-more-violent/

          Your illogical resistent to the facts and your persistent evasive tactics are beyond any words. All I have to say as someone who actually fucking cares about the “problem” as opposed to you who likely doesn’t care abput what Black people do or what’s happening today or tomorrow for them.

          All you really care about is that the problem’s explanation is consistent with your PC beliefs.

  43. quote by ep-gah

    Keeping illegals out is more important for Australia than even for America, because ¾ of the land is not civilized, which is a mind-boggling waste of land. For comparison, think of trying to cram America’s whole population into the original 13 States.

    Australia’s land is mostly desert or semi-desert.

    1. So is Arizona, so is much of Nevada, so WAS most of California. (Vis. their current water “problems”. So what? Humans have proven repeatedly our ability to not only survive in the desert, but terraform it.

      Syria’s population has TRIPLED, and some idiots are trying to blame their terrorism on “Global Warming” instead of their own inability to keep it in their pants. Which do you think has more an impact on resource scarcity?

      1. It’s probably a good idea to leave the land alone. Everyone’s already bitching that the rain forests are being depleted and whatnot. Australia already has a huge section of it’s land off limits to developers. How could that be bad?

  44. quote by ep-gah (in response to topic about megafarms being stolen by greedy US companies

    How are they stealing land? You mean BUYING it, right? Offering more for the land than the savages can afford?

    If they STEAL land, that would leave a big hole, and we could toss all misbehaving Third Worlders into it, right?

    Whatever that is going on, independent farmers are driven off. They have a choice, rebel against the government, as in the Chiapas thing in Mexico, or go for easy cash in the US.

    Independent farmers are also driven off by cheap US imports, as was the case in the Haiti thing Clinton did in the 90s.

    1. Yes, they’d rather fight US for “easy cash” than fight their own country.
      That only means they see us as easier enemies than their fellow scum, and sometimes we won’t even fight back, right?

      America rebuilt Haiti 5X, every time, the savages raped our aid workers–not just the women. Why is that?
      And why did it never “take”, it always returned to the shit it is now?
      Could it be the reduced capacities mentioned at the top of this page?

      1. Savage isn’t always genetic or even from one parent homes. Seems like in Haiti the major religion is Voodoo. That could be a major culprit. Voodoo combined with illiteracy and other backward traits.

      2. quote by ep-gah

        Yes, they’d rather fight US for “easy cash” than fight their own country.
        That only means they see us as easier enemies than their fellow scum, and sometimes we won’t even fight back, right?

        You could have a point there. A lot of Americans aren’t going to be bothered fighting illegals cause they live in neighborhoods far from them. Unfortunately, only brutish repulsive white trash would join racist organizations actually fighting them.

        Anyhow, it’s still a sad story, cause the USA did cause the situation, but now the illegals will have to deal with the resentful poor whites who want to fight them.

    2. You know, if whites fought back more, maybe savages would stay in their own country and either fix it up or fuck it up the rest the way, (Guess which is more likely!) instead of invading ours?

        1. Phil is black. Why isn’t he insulted by the constant use of the word savage? Oh wait, I get it. He isn’t one of those “bandwagon” blacks who always follow the crowd.

      1. Using the word savage isn’t nice. Anyhow, Iv’e seen a lot of white savages, trashy people etc.., and some, not all, are drawn toward white nationalism. Take a look at your typical prison neo-nazi. Is he somebody you’d be scared of? Maybe you could just write him off ot your family and say, “Oh he’s in a rock band.”

  45. quote by ep-gah

    Black juries begin freeing obviously guilty Black criminals, Blacks periodically engage in mass urban riots due to “police brutality”.

    This bullshit goes on forever with no end in sight, ever.

    The whole stupid cycle is caused by one thing: Blacks committing a ridiculous amount of crime in the first place! This is what causes the whole mess.”

    The whole cycle is caused by one parent homes.

    1. I’d go so far to say that South Africa would be a fairly nice place, some problems but manageable, if not for one parent homes. I’d also say Martin Luther King’s dream would have mostly worked, if not for one parent homes.

      1. Now you’re switching from incest to one-parent homes.
        Fine, let’s play in this new gameboard.

        How do we fix that? Require a license to breed? Sterilize the retarded savages? Phil said force neurotopic drugs on them to make them peaceful.
        What is your SOLUTION?

        1. Well, relatively yes aggressive. Impulsiveness due to IQ may leave them more prone to crime but a noticeable change in aggressiveness would be present.

          Huh, if you want a solution from this Joker you might as well go for the fucking lottery while your at it. All you’re going to get is a repeated “one parent home” reply or a snarky remark with a smiley face.

          Jason is either going to break at this point or cool off and wait for another opportunity to fill the comment section to the brim with half assed excuses.

        2. Well, relatively yes aggressive. Impulsiveness due to IQ may leave them more prone to crime but a noticeable change in aggressiveness would be present.

          Huh, if you want a solution from this Joker you might as well go for the fucking lottery while your at it. All you’re going to get is a repeated “one parent home” reply or a snarky remark with a smiley face.

          Jason is either going to break at this point or cool off and wait for another opportunity to fill the comment section to the brim with half assed excuses.

          Incest could play a major role in some cases, but in others, like the US and South Africa, one parent homes seem to play a major role. Anyhow, even an incest ridden family with two parents won’t produce disrespectful monsters.

        3. Incest could produce a population that’s academically inferior, but not one that would rob, rape, kill etc.. One parent homes, on the other hand, will produce a population full of punks who do all those things and more.

  46. Savage could be a good thing. Women might like it. It would be positive like similar words like “beast”, “monster”. It depends on how you look at it. “Oh, he’s a savage in bed.”, “He’s a beast in bed.”

    That brings up another topic, penis envy. Could it be white nationalists and generally whites who are prejudiced all thru history fear the sexual superiority of some non-whites? The white women are threatened. Well, of course.

    1. First of all, the length differences between Black and White penis lengths are minimal. Higher E2 through there lives and Higher T during earlier Puberty and up to early 30’s could have some edge but I’m unsure of actually performance.

      Also, you come off as a major jackass since you are clearly not considering the substantial differences in RAPE between the two!

      1. Maybe sexual self confidence is the word, regardless of size, and with blacks, also physical strength. That would be a threat to a lot of white men, since human nature is jealous.

        1. Well I would correct you in terms of physical strength actually favoring White interms of their presentation in upper body strength, but actually Black physical attribute are at the legs which would be lower body.

          However, that would depend on pelvis ability. I couldn’t find anything with men at least, but studies show that it is SMART black men that are rated most attractive by white women, not Blacks in general.

  47. Phil is clearly ignoring free trade, incest, one parent homes, as though those things aren’t major factors holding various groups down. I have no idea what Phil’s theory is on the matter. So what is the elephant in the room that I’m ignoring?

    1. Phil said something about giving blacks pills to make them less aggressive. Well, that’s a noble thought, but a waste of time when considering you should go after the source of the problem. It’s kind of like getting pain medication for a toothache, when you can just pull the tooth.

      1. “Phil is clearly ignoring free trade, incest, one parent homes, as though those things aren’t major factors holding various groups down. I have no idea what Phil’s theory is on the matter. So what is the elephant in the room that I’m ignoring?”
        I would same the same to you and I would actually like some evidence of this happening.

        “Phil said something about giving blacks pills to make them less aggressive. Well, that’s a noble thought, but a waste of time when considering you should go after the source of the problem. It’s kind of like getting pain medication for a toothache, when you can just pull the tooth.”

        Then show me the source of the problem then. Lets work to together. Believe me I don’t WANT to believe that due to genetic reasons Blacks are held back but due to the coherence of the Nature v. Nurture shit I will follow whatever sensible path I can towards uplift.

        So Jason, show me stats, show me articles, tell me stories, contact someone who’s suffering, fucking anything to give me a reason to buy it.

        Until you’ve done so then STFU.
        https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/05/19/fulani-hausa-igbo-and-yoruba-mating-patterns/
        ALSO your theory with “incest”. Incest from marriage/breeding behavior that I could find would not suggest major incest patterns occurring in Africa aside from Muslims. Even then, the diversity of Ethnic groups that came here as slaves PLUS the Christianization would’ve likely eliminate chances of incest.

        Also Jason, with you’re theory of incest, in the grand scheme of things what difference does it make from the Climate theory? In the end it still leaves with a genetically different race in regards to lower intelligence.

        And as you said before, a white gene flow would be NEEDED to raise it’s IQ eugenically.

        I asked you this before with no response so for shits and giggles I’ll ask you again,are you suggesting that WN’s would accept, if not outright replace the climate one, this theory about them fucking there siblings that they need superior white genes to be better.

        On top of that, Incest creates tribal behavior as well. I’m not saying that it is like it is because it’s not logical to HBD, but because YOU have claimed that the only reason you disagree with the climate theory is because WN’s make Non-whites feel bad.

        But oh ho, YOUR brilliant theory will be much more accepting.

        1. Iv’e already given documentation from the Economist website regarding one parent homes in South Africa. There are also tons of websites which verify much of the Muslim world is inbred. I’m sure I could easily find websites verifying that much of the US ghetto is full of one parent homes. But I will try to do more research.

          I don’t claim to know all the answers, but you all don’t know everything either.

        2. “Iv’e already given documentation from the Economist website regarding one parent homes in South Africa. There are also tons of websites which verify much of the Muslim world is inbred. I’m sure I could easily find websites verifying that much of the US ghetto is full of one parent homes. But I will try to do more research.

          I don’t claim to know all the answers, but you all don’t know everything either.”
          Okay, the MUSLIM world, what about the christain/animist part of Africa?

          And true, I don’t know all the answers but mine have been more coherent so far.

          But still, if you can provide sufficient evidence so be it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)