Do Democratic Party Intellectuals Tell Whites That They Are Evil?

A commenter, Reactionary Konkvistador, says:

Whites aren’t being told they are evil by the Republicans, Democrat intellectuals practically can’t shut up about it.

Fundamentally I do however agree that they are stupid for voting Republican.

This is so wrong. Can you give me the name of one single Democratic Party intellectual who tells Whites that they are evil? One, one, one, c’mon. I dare you.

The vast majority of people who talk like this at all are not even really associated with the Democratic Party. To the extent that they are at all, they are on the Left wing of the party. Like I said, I used to hang out at Daily Kos. We had a few of those types there. Tim Wise even had a blog on the site. That type of thinking was not very popular, and those blogs were not much trafficked. The vast majority of folks pushing such a line were Blacks and Hispanics themselves.

Most Democratic Party intellectuals don’t even talk much about race at all, last time I checked. It’s the Left that can’t shut up about race, but that’s not even the Democratic Party really. Those people are more or less Commies and Leftists.

And even there, sometimes the critique is at not Whites, but rightwing Whites, often older rightwing Whites. Tim Wise’s famous “Tick Tock” column, which I actually agreed with and supported, was not cheering on the coming deaths of older Whites, but the coming deaths of older rightwing Whites.

You had to read the column carefully to figure that out. I agree with his conclusion. I look forward to their deaths also. They can’t come soon enough for me. The column was ridiculously peddled about the paranoid White nationalist sites as evidence that Tim Wise, or the Democratic Party, or liberals, or someone, wants Whites to die.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

0 thoughts on “Do Democratic Party Intellectuals Tell Whites That They Are Evil?”

  1. Ah, Tim Wise. Gotta love that pompous, excitable, self-righteous, sanctimonious, wannabe Jewbag prick.

  2. Like I said before, you may not have card carrying members of the Democratic Party espousing this kind of ideology, but there’s a thin line between them and Tim Wise.

    Besides, those black and Hispanic activist types that you mentioned tend to vote Democratic. Somehow, I just don’t feel comfortable being part of a coalition that includes them, not to mention the fact that Zionist Jews basically run the party.

    Blacks, Hispanic open borders activists, and Zionist Jews. Not exactly the kind of crowd I like being around.

    1. You are correct, most of those nutty Abagond CRT PC types do vote Democrat. And there are some blogs like that over at Daily Kos. But DK is the left wing of the Democratic Party itself, and those guys are on the left of DK.

      You are right that a fair number of Black and Hispanic Left-liberal activist intellectuals talk like this, but they don’t have a lot of influence in the party. I know because I am somewhat connected to the Democratic Party in California, have worked for them for a while (I even went to a fufndraisher for Jerry Brown in a fancy house in 1982 and I know the Democratic Party types and office holders, often Hispanic, here in the Valley. Trust when I say that they are not anti-White or any such thing. However, they are more or less pro Open Borders, but all Hispanic politicians are. If Open Borders is anti-White then ok, they are anti-White then.

      But all this White-hating, PC, CRT bullshit is not seen very much in the Democratic Party proper, trust me on that one.

      There is also a Commie Wing of the party, yes, Glen Beck is correct, but they have no influence and no power. You see them on some forums and most US Commie and Left types of course do vote Democratic.

      1. Well, you do raise a valid point, Robert.

        I guess I have a tendency to lump in radical leftists with the Democratic Party.

        My syllogisms are as follows:

        Leftists hate whites
        Non-white activists hate whites
        The Democratic Party features leftists and lots of non-whites
        Therefore, the Democratic Party hates whites.

        I guess maybe I shouldn’t conflate the Democratic party with the CRT/PC nuts. But as you once said, Robert, any sane white man could never support the American left. And since I associate the Democratic party with the left, and since my favorite groups of people heavily support the Democrats, I naturally feel estranged from them.

        As odious as the American right wing establishment is, they don’t make me feel bad for being white or male.

        1. As odious as the American right wing establishment is, they don’t make me feel bad for being white or male.

          Actually, I need to amend that.

          The American right wing establishment certainly embarrasses me as a white man I wish they would cut their ignorant, corporatist, and religious fanaticism crap. They make me feel bad in other ways.

          What I meant to say was that they don’t demonize me for being who I am.

        2. The Democratic party isn’t “left”, it’s “center left” or “moderate liberal”. Important distinction. Of course there many people in the far left that are Dems but that’s just because the Green party isn’t viable and they have no other option.

  3. Tim Wise’s famous “Tick Tock” column, which I actually agreed with and supported, was not cheering on the coming deaths of older Whites, but the coming deaths of older rightwing Whites.

    Wise was also gloating over white people being outnumbered by Mexicans. God knows why, because I’ve never heard as much casual antisemitism from whites as I have from Hispanics and Blacks.

    The breaking point for me was when union leaders like Trumka started advocating for open borders. What is the point of a left whose immigration stance is identical to that of fucking libertarians? Did these people ever take a math class? A constant increase in the supply of domestic labor only brings US wages and living standards down to the global mean. I don’t see Wise or any of the “love knows no borders” crowd living like campesinos.

    The same yuppies who care passionately about DADT and the Dream Act don’t give a flying fuck about working class US citizens.

    1. @ Lafleur

      Wise was also gloating over white people being outnumbered by Mexicans.

      Exactly. He was not only cheering on the deaths of old right wing whites, he was also gloating over whites being outnumbered by Mexicans and other non-whites.

      And he’s gloating over ALL WHITES being outnumbered, not just right wingers.

      What is the point of a left whose immigration stance is identical to that of fucking libertarians?

      As I’ve said before, if leftists realized how much their open borders, pro-immigration rhetoric conformed to neoliberal discourse, they’d be amazed. Actually, no they wouldn’t.

      The same yuppies who care passionately about DADT and the Dream Act don’t give a flying fuck about working class US citizens.

      American born white workers can have their jobs outsourced, have their wages undercut, etc, and most leftists don’t give a shit.

      But say something bad about illegal immigrants or gays, and they’ll pounce on you. The American left is an abomination. Maybe it’s just me, but I can’t help but think that the left cares more about 3rd worlders than fellow Americans, particularly white
      Americans.

      1. I don’t see Wise or any of the “love knows no borders” crowd living like campesinos.

        Well, the term “limousine liberal” exists for a reason.

        1. People like Wise should be deported for treason. The academic P.C.left needs to be, well, euthanized.

          However- “limosine liberal” is a really lame expression. It needs to go away. It is almost an oxymoron. Most liberals are not stinking filth rich. Just because most high profile artists/celebrities seem to be liberals…so what? They are a miniscule proportion of the total.

          Wouldn’t “limousine conservative” be more appropriate?

          Liberals- I”LL SAY IT AGAIN- are a mix of non-working class whites, people o’color, some die-hard union types, most of the disenfranchised poor, and a small number of high profile celeb types. (And most J-people). Of these groups, only the J-ish and the celebs are likely to be truly wealthy.

          What a lot of liberals are is: relatively “comfortable”- they don’t have to fear their job being taken by a fucking Mexican- hence their open border B.S. Plus- it fits with their bleeding heart ethos. Yeah, they can afford to be nice.

          However, all right wingers have no problem with “limousine capitalists”, right? And, unlike Madonna or Brad Pitt, these assholes really are out to fuck over the world- and YOU AND ME.

          So- who’s more dangerous?

        2. Mott, when I use the term “limousine liberal,” I think of people like Ted Kennedy. Basically, white liberals who preach integration but send their own kids to all white private schools. People who advocate open borders and affirmative action but already have cushy jobs so they have nothing to fear, etc.

          At least when I use the term, its connotation doesn’t have so much to do with wealth as it does hypocrisy.

          Most liberals, indeed, are not filthy rich (neither are most conservatives, or people of any ideology for that matter, but that’s another topic).

          However, at least where I live, they are relatively affluent. For me, the thing is, I live near/spend a decent amount of time around liberals/SWPL’s. They’re the main people I have to deal with, so psychologically speaking, I’m going to zero in on them.

          It all depends on your personal experience, I suppose.

        3. Otherwise, Mott, I agree with your post.

          Liberals can be blind bleeding heart souls because they can afford to be, for the most part.

          (so can many conservatives, especially the OC Republicans I’ve encountered but that’s another matter).

        4. @ BAG- The worst hypocrites of all have got to be the Repububicans.

          At least, when Leftists are wrong, they tend to be so with “good”, mostly benevolent intentions.

          Most open border idiots really think that they will not come for THEIR JOB. (First they came for the job of the crop pickers- and I said nothing, Then they came for the factory jobs, and I did nothing Then they came for the warehouse jobs, and I did nothing…) ha ha

          Exception: Mexican dirtbags who hate Anglos and want to take over.

          Real hypocrisy, however, is not exemplified by the “rich liberal”- do you expect them to give away their money? No, you don’t.

          They are not guilty of real, First Degree hypocrisy. It’s just rich people expressing overgenerousness.

          REAL First Degree Hypocrisy is SAYING one thing and DOING the opposite.

          The Repubs SAY they are against illegal immigration. They tend to DO NOTHING.
          That’s even worse. Why? It’s bad for business, and that’s what they’re all about.

          They just LIE and say they are against it – to get votes. That’s even worse!

          Exception: on a state level, some are sticking their noses out (Arizona, Georgia). They won’t do it nationally…

          Why? Watch them pick Paco Rubio for Vice President in a pathetic attempt to get Hispicish votes!

          I’l take sincerely misguided do-gooders over coporate liars. Tough call, tho.

  4. “Wise was also gloating over white people being outnumbered by Mexicans. God knows why, because I’ve never heard as much casual antisemitism from whites as I have from Hispanics and Blacks.”

    Bingo. Sometimes I read the local hispanic or Brazilian press.

  5. A constant increase in the supply of domestic labor only brings US wages and living standards down to the global mean. I don’t see Wise or any of the “love knows no borders” crowd living like campesinos.

    The thing is, as you’ve pointed out before, this country doesn’t need more workers. It needs more JOBS.

    As Paul Craig Roberts once remarked, we import people and export jobs. In an ideal situation, it would be the opposite.

    With unemployment high and employment prospects decreasing, you have to have shit for brains or be an open borders ideologue to suggest that we need more immigrants.

    Importing all this non-talent from Mexico and H-1Bers from China and India doesn’t do shit to grow the economy. We could import the entire world, and it wouldn’t solve our economic woes. In fact, it would probably make things worse.

  6. The Jew holohoax Explained ln One Sentence – by Hoff

    YOU can’t die from Zyklon-B.

    Did you get it?

    Get this, NOBODY CAN DIE FROM A ZYKLON-B shower simply because Zyklon-B is Non-lethal.

    NOW – did YOU get it?

    You still don’t get it? Okay, The bugspray Zyklon-B came in pellet’s and it is an extremely complicated operation to heat up the Zyklon-B pellet’s to a lice killing fumigating gas.

    Do you understand how your heating or AC system works in your house? Most likely you don’t have a clue how it works and this is why most people don’t know what Zyklon-B is – a heated bugspray.

    You can buy Zyklon-B at your local shop. Just ask for a bugspray. A bugspray on can is a simplyfied version of the extremely complicated bugspray Zyklon-B.

    There was no gas-chambers in any workcamp in Germany.

    ln Poland on the other hand there was gas-chambers in every workcamp. And the reason why there was no gas-chamber in Germany is that every single person who was allowed entry into Germany was deloused in the workcamps in Poland.

    Zyklon-B is a BUGSPRAY.

    Zyklon-B only kills bugs and lice. And this is why every single person including all the germans was deloused – TYPHUS-fever lice.

    The germans gassed everybody including them self and they gassed to SAVE LIFE – NOT TO TAKE LIFE.

    The timeless eternal lying jew scumbags has warped the truth.

    Do you get it? Yes, it’s mindboggling and it turns everything you was ever told up side down. l Hoff is not here to BS you. l’m here to tell you the truth. Can you handle the truth?

    The truth is that the jews holohoax is just one more timless eternal lying jew scum bullshit. The holohoax never happend. Period

    by heg

    1. Heg, with all due respect, can you comment on anything BESIDES the Jewish Question? Believe me, I’m well aware of the Jewish Question, but do you seriously have to bring it up during every single post?

  7. @Bay Area Guy

    Have a heart and join the appeal to stop the deportation of victims of US backed genocide in their native countries from the US.

    “Manuela Maldonado was born into poverty in Mexico, and came to the United States 13 years ago to seek a better life for her family. Today she is the mother of six children, four of them born in America, and one grandson who she has raised since he was born. Her family is active in their community, including involvement with HOLA, a local grassroots organization that helps the local Latino community.”

    http://www.interfaithimmigration.org/index.php/2011/05/13/urgent-ohio-family-to-be-separated-as-early-as-may-17/

    Surprise! Surprise! US ATF Nazis are selling weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

    http://wvwnews.net/story.php?id=10160

    The American Jewish Committee calls for humane immigration reform.

    http://www.ajc.org/site/c.ijITI2PHKoG/b.6447757/k.CEBC/Immigration_Policy.htm

    ”June 6, 2011 – Washington, DC — Immigration reform needs to be humane, just, effective and efficient. That was the message from the distinguished panelists addressing the opening session of AJC national summit on immigration, Building a Bridge to the Future.

    The event featured Randel Johnson, senior vice president of labor, immigration and employee benefits at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; Alejandro Mayorkas, director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Mathew Staver, dean of the Law School at Liberty University; and David Leopold, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. Each favors a legal path to immigration for the estimated 12 million undocumented workers in the United States.

    The three-day summit – part of AJC’s Bridging America Project, which trains and mobilizes leaders in strategic communities across the country — drew some 120 business leaders, labor union activists, government, law enforcement, health care officials and faith leaders.”

    This is the best bit.

    Johnson challenged Congress “to get ahead of the curve for a change so that when the economy improves,” an immigration reform “bill is ready.”

    The AJC Immigration Summit is co-sponsored by the National Immigration Forum, Immigration Works USA, and Conservatives for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, and is funded by a generous grant from the Ford Foundation.”

    http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=6449129&ct=10862721&notoc=1

    Isn’t that interesting the Ford Foundation which was active in post revolutionary Soviet Russia is still very much active today.

    I bet you probably own a Ford car BAG.

    1. @ John

      Oh lord. First of all, I don’t own a Ford.

      Second of all, do you really think the AJC gives a shit about the plight of Hispanics?

      And you know, Johnny boy, I would gladly support Mexican victims of U.S. “genocide,” but doing so would allow for the rise of the CIA/Mossad funded, New World Order, Chechen anti-christ.

      *rolls eyes*

      I don’t bother with you, John, because you’re not to be taken seriously.

      1. @Bay Area Guy

        “Second of all, do you really think the AJC gives a shit about the plight of Hispanics?”

        Does this answer your question?

        ”III. Protecting birthright citizenship is grounded in Jewish values.

        According to Jewish tradition, “strangers” are to be welcomed and valued, as we were once “strangers in the land of Egypt.” The Torah tells us: “The strangers who sojourn with you shall be to you as the natives among you, and you shall love them as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt” (Leviticus 19:33-34). As American Jews, we recall how just a few decades ago, there were in this country times and places where members of the Jewish community were treated as second-class citizens and sometimes subjected to blatant discrimination. Adhering to the highest values of both our faith and our proud heritage as American citizens, we pledge to call attention to the moral dimensions of this debate and to uphold the human dignity of each person, made b’tselem elohim, in the image of G-d.”

        http://www.ajc.org/atf/cf/%7B42d75369-d582-4380-8395-d25925b85eaf%7D/AJC_BIRTHRIGHT_CITIZENSHIP_RESOLUTION_2011.PDF

        All religious groups are pro-immigration perhaps Christian denomination more than Jewish ones.

        http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=10164

        “And you know, Johnny boy, I would gladly support Mexican victims of U.S. “genocide,” but doing so would allow for the rise of the CIA/Mossad funded, New World Order, Chechen anti-christ.

        Funny actually as a number of Chechen terrorist commanders had previous lengthily residence in the US travelling on US passports before leading terrorist operations in the North Caucasus.

        How exactly were the 9/11 hijackers able to freely travel in Europe and the US?

        “(Sakka’s) story is also one of a globetrotting terrorist in an organisation that is truly multinational.
        […]
        The Chechens needed trained fighters. Sakka was telephoned by Ibn al-Khattab, the late militia leader controlling the foreign fighters against the Russians. Khattab requested that Sakka’s trainees should be sent on to Afghanistan for military training because “conditions are tough”.
        […]
        One of Sakka’s chief roles was to organise passports and visas for the volunteers to make their way to Afghanistan through Pakistan. His ability to keep providing high-quality forged papers made Turkey a main hub for Al-Qaeda movements, his lawyer says. The young men came to Turkey pretending to be on holiday and Sakka’s false papers allowed them to “disappear” overseas.
        Turkish intelligence were aware of unusual militant Islamic activity in the Yalova mountains, where Sakka had set up his camps.
        […]
        Some of Sakka’s account is corroborated by the US government’s 9/11 Commission. It found evidence that four of the hijackers – whom Sakka says he trained – had initially intended to go to Chechnya from Turkey but the border into Georgia was closed.
        […]
        Sakka’s lawyer said: “Just like there is money laundering, there is also terrorist laundering and Turkey was the centre of this.”

        http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/15/551916/-Sibel-Edmonds-Case:-The-Central-Asia-Islamization-Cocktail:-Mosques,-Madrassas,-HeroinTerrorism

        1. Ugh, John.

          First of all, you do realize that I was being sarcastic and poking fun at you with my Chechen remark, right?

          Second of all, if you truly believe that Jewish organizations support Hispanic immigrants on account of moral values, then you have not payed much attention to how the Jewish lobby/organized Jewry works in this country.

          Organizations like the AJC, ADL, etc, support Hispanic immigrants because they want Hispanic politicians and voters to go along with their agenda, including support for Israel.

          Ditto for blacks. Think of the deal between Arthur Hertzberg and Charles Rangel, where in exchange for the Jewish establishment supporting domestic policies (mainly welfare programs) that the Congressional Black Caucus wanted, the CBC would keep its mouth shut about Israel’s dealings with apartheid South Africa.

          http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_032311.htm

        2. @Bay Area Guy

          I think the mood is changing in regards to immigration and Jewish support for it as immigrants tend to be left wing (except Cubans) and anti-Zionist.

          All the major nationalist groups in Europe are pro Israel and anti-Muslim.

          Europe’s Right is embracing its Jews

          http://www.njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/040209/njScholarEuropesRight.html

          And the western media is becoming more critical towards blacks, Pakistanis and other minorities.

          Fox News supports the anti-immigration law in Arizona.

      2. BAGgy, how do you know what the motive is of Jewish organizations? I’m sure Israel and the Jews are big concerns, but do you have some secret memo that says, “We don’t really give a shit about Hispanics”?

        I don’t know how big-shot Jews think, the kind of yids who run these organizations, because I don’t know any of them. I have known some regular Jewish-American liberals, including some who donate to these organizations (the ones who donate are all senior citizens). The really do give a shit about Hispanic immigrants. They really, really do.

        1. @ Aaron (BAGgy, really?)

          No, of course I don’t have some secret memo in my possession. I can’t read minds.

          I base my opinion on the history of how Jewish organizations have dealt with black causes, such as making sure that black politicians and black organizations like the NAACP don’t criticize Israel, with the threat of withholding funding (the NAACP from its inception was dependent on Jewish money). Malcolm X saw right through the civil rights posturing of Jews.

          I base my opinion on the hypocrisy and inconsistency of American Jewish liberals, particularly as it pertains to them supporting multiculturalism at home while simultaneously supporting Jewish ethnonationalism abroad (and for themselves).

          Call me a cynic, Aaron, but I really don’t believe that most Jews care about blacks or Hispanics. Even if they do, it’s not for altruistic reasons, but Jewish self-interest. The more diverse, multicultural, and balkanized the U.S. is, the better it is for Jews. Or as Malcolm X pointed out, the more the white man focuses his attention on non-whites, the less he’ll focus on the Jew. And it’s worked.

          Sure, some Jews might very well be genuinely sympathetic, but I highly doubt that that’s the case for most of them.

          Same thing with supposedly progressive and anti-Zionist Jews when it comes to the Israel/Palestine conflict. Oh sure, they’ll denounce the most egregious of Israeli crimes. But when it comes to BDS (boycott, divestment, and sanctions), the right of return for Palestinians, and taking on the Jewish/Israel lobby, they all fall short. The Noam Chomsky’s, the Norman Finkelstein’s, the Uri Avnery’s (although Avnery at least takes on the Jewish lobby), and other crypto Zionists (though in Finkelstein’s case, I don’t really think he’s a Zionist so much as he is just regurgitating his mentor Chomsky).

          I think for many Jews in the PSM (Palestinian Solidarity Movement), their involvement is about helping Jews save face

        2. “BAGgy, how do you know what the motive is of Jewish organizations? I’m sure Israel and the Jews are big concerns, but do you have some secret memo that says, “We don’t really give a shit about Hispanics”?””

          You don’t need to be a mind reader. You just need to look at the dichotomy between Jewish words and Jewish actions. People who protest the ethnic cleansing in Darfur while zealously defending the one going on in Palestine are full of shit. People who promote multiculturalism in North America while promoting ethnic homogeneity in Israel are full of shit. People who promote the term ‘Judeo-Christian’ civilization while manufacturing porn and Hollywood movies are full of shit. Ergo, when said people claim to care about the interests of Blacks/Hispanics/minorities it is safe to infer that (you guessed it) they are full of shit.

          When deciphering the tribe’s motives, the age old adage that ‘All roads lead to Israel’ is immensely helpful.

          lol @ BaGgy btw 😀

        3. @ Dota

          Regarding Darfur, Jeffrey Blankfort has claimed that the whole “Save Darfur” campaign is being promoted by Jews, who falsely label the conflict in Darfur as an Arab on black genocide in order promote anti-Arab sentiment among blacks.

          But anyways, Dota, excellent comment. The fundamental question that governs the tribe’s decisions is “is it good for the Jews?”

  8. Thing is, the far-left anti-White stuff rides on the back of the Democratic Party (and, it must be admitted, to some extent on the moderate Republicans). So, what with Reverend Wright at all, at the very least the Democrats are telling Whites they should feel _guilty_ about being White, what with all their privileges and all. What is Affirmative Action if it’s not an admission of guilt? Anyhow, I see it as a continuum. Democrats a little more likely to push the White guilt meme, but Republicans going along with it, sometimes reluctantly. So your basic White voter is likely to prefer the latter.

    1. Is Revered White anti-White? Can you give me some quotes?

      As I said, I hung around California Democratic Party circles for a long time. Race is simply not discussed at all. It’s a toxic subject. Most of the party folks are Whites. Now there may be some Hispanics. Everyone just gets along. I also spent a lot of time on Daily Kos. There’s little anti-White sentiment on there other than a few Tim Wise types. I believe that most DK posters themselves are White!

      Is the Dem Party even pushing AA anymore? I haven’t noticed.

      The anti-White stuff really comes form the Hard Left, especially the Western Left. These people are more or less Commie or Leftist types. Sure, they mostly vote Democrat, but they are very fringe in the Democratic Party.

      There’s also a fair amount of it from PC radical Blacks and Hispanics, but you don’t find them in party circles generally.

  9. Robert’s obviously right on this one. Some people just write stuff like what he quoted here as if they’re trying to come across as kooky and nutty as possible. They make up whatever they think sounds good. Then they whine that everybody calls them kooks and cranks. It was the same thing with that “white genocide” thing a while back. In each case, their kookiness is based on some real truth, but they’re still kooks. It’s not so much their extreme views as it is their disconnect from reality. They should really try a thicker grade of tinfoil in their hats.

  10. Whether Tim Wise was wishing death on white people in general, old white people specifically, or even just old right-wing white people, the point is that his argument boiled down to: You don’t agree with me, so I want you to die.

    If you study Russian history (Alexander Solzhenitsyn or the histories of the Holodomor or the NKVD) or even the work of the Bavarian Spartacists (like Eugene Levine or Kurt Eisner), you will notice a trend: a bunch of left-wing Jews who were so intent on creating a worker’s paradise that they were going to not only kill the noblemen and kulaks, but anyone else who dared to slow down the coming of the utopia.

    I don’t believe the Jews are behind everything, but Wise is one of these aforementioned types of Jew. He publicly wished for the cessation of life for those who disagreed with him. If he had power, if he was indeed not some marginal race-baiter on the college lecture circuit, he wouldn’t be wishing for the death of his enemies. He would be putting them in the gulag. And, this may be an error on my part, but I wonder if you might not be helping him, based on your endorsement of his “Open Letter.”

    I don’t advocate violence and I would never engage in it except for self-defense, but I’ll say this now: I hope Tim Wise dies, because he is evil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.