Why Ron Paul is Not Ok

fpy says:

What do people here think of Ron Paul? He’s the only Republican who seems to NOT be an evil, plutocratic, warmongering fuck.

Libertarian. No to Libertarians! Libertarianism will ensure that the plutocrats have complete, total and absolute power. Libertarianism is more or less what holds in the 3rd World. It’s just ultra-capitalism with a minimal to nonexistent state to protect the people from the capitalists. Thing is, real Libertarianism has not only never existed, but it never will exist, and it never can exist. Capitalists need a state like a baby needs its mother. Without a state, the capitalists are nowhere. In particular, they need a very strong army and police to safeguard their wealth. And nowadays, US capitalism anyway is utterly tied in with imperialism to the extent that it can’t exist without it. Have you noticed that most advanced capitalist states are also imperialists? People keep telling me how modern capitalist states can avoid imperialism, but it’s just not possible. A large modern capitalist state must be imperialist. It’s mandatory. If you can’t understand that, then you don’t understand the nature of capitalism at all. Start with Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest State of Capitalism. Lenin is right! There is a group out there on the Internet who are associated with the pure Objectivists of the Ayn Rand school. I forget their name right now. I went over to their website, and it was the usual Libertarian crap. Plus, almost all the writers were Jews. Libertarianism is stacked floor to ceiling with Jews. To my shock, there was article after article supporting US imperialism, especially in defense of Israel and also towards socialist states. They identified Hugo Chavez and Cuba as enemy states and more or less advocated going to war against them. They get it. Modern US capitalism must be imperialist. There is no other way. Imperialism is part of the project. The Project for a New American Century crowd are US imperialists on steroids. They’re also a bunch of Jews too, but forget that for now. Read their papers carefully. The US has no allies, according to them. None, except Israel. All other countries are identified as enemy states (capitalist competitors). Europe is identified as an enemy region and steps are advocated to screw over Europe. Russia is a strong enemy state and is identified as such. Numerous projects are advocated to fuck over Russia. In particular, China is labeled as the worst enemy of the US. Due to capitalist and geopolitical competition, the PNAC crowd figures that the US will have to go to war with China at some point in the next 20 years. Under capitalism, you cannot have any allies. None, zero. An advanced capitalist state is competing with all other capitalist states. There is only so much money on Earth. As one state gets richer, it has to come from someone else. Probably you. Capitalist economic competition frequently results in open warfare, typically over markets. This is what geopolitics, Realpolitik, the Great Game, etc. are all about. And it’s one of the strongest arguments ever against capitalism. Capitalism virtually necessitates war, and war has deep ties to capitalism. Most Americans like capitalism, but few understand that war and imperialism are its essential handmaidens.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

0 thoughts on “Why Ron Paul is Not Ok”

  1. Plus, almost all the writers were Jews. Libertarianism is stacked floor to ceiling with Jews.
    Damn.
    Neocons, cultural marxists, multiculturalists, and now libertarians.
    Seems like Jews have either created or are over-represented in almost every negative ideological category.

  2. “They’re also a bunch of Jews too, but forget that for now”
    NO. YOU CAN’T JUST FORGET THAT!!!
    The capitalist system sucks for sure, but it’s not just the system that’s the problem. It’s also the input. Think about a computer. The output form a computer is just as dependent on the input as it is on the processes performed. So whatever the economic system is, the real world outcomes will depend on what is put into it, and if jews are allowed to do the inputting then it will suck to some degree for everyone who isn’t jewish. If jews have a hand in shaping the system itself then it will be even worse. People need to drop this idea about people being some mindless economic unit that will perform the exact same each time by some rational process. The ethnic backround of some groups is an extremely important issue to be dealt with when talking about the economy.

  3. “Libertarianism will ensure that the plutocrats have complete, total and absolute power. Libertarianism is more or less what holds in the 3rd World. It’s just ultra-capitalism with a minimal to nonexistent state to protect the people from the capitalists.”
    Not all Libertarians are ultra capitalist.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism

  4. Rob, I hate libertarians as much as you do. But at least Paul is consisten in that he wants to cut Israel off for good and dismantle the Empire.

  5. “Europe is identified as an enemy region and steps are advocated to screw over Europe. Russia is a strong enemy state and is identified as such. Numerous projects are advocated to fuck over Russia. In particular, China is labeled as the worst enemy of the US. Due to capitalist and geopolitical competition, the PNAC crowd figures that the US will have to go to war with China at some point in the next 20 years”
    I talk about it a lot, but the George Friedman book goes into this. In fact, it one of the main points of the book. The way he sees it, the only powers that can challenge the US are in eurasia. Therefore the US must destablize eurasia. This is not an exaggeration, it a paraphrase of something he says often. He doesn’t care how many people are killed because it’s good for the US ( and hence the jews). The only difference is that he thinks that China will fall apart soon and Russia will be the main US enemy because he think that europe can de easily divided and conquered. He say that there are three areas off eurasia that are of great importance for russian security: Kazakstan (US bases in central asia), the caucausus (allaince with georgia and turkey), and the baltic/poland region (NATO expansion/missle shield). He also say that there is one region of paramount importance to Russia, the Ukraine/Belarus area (Orange Revolution/demonization of Lukashenko). He hopes that by implementing these steps against these areas the US can make Russia collapse down to the borders of Medieval Russia, which would basically be a huge Yugoslavia type disaster. However this would be good because chaos in eurasia is good for the US (his words not mine). It;s almost unimaginable how sick some of these people are.
    This is why I think there needs to be an alliance between China, Russia, and Europe (possibly excluding the British parasites) to keep US influence out of the eastern hemisphere. The SCO is a start, but continental europe needs to be included for it to work well and maybe Iran or India.

    1. This is a great comment Wade. I agree with everything you said here. Friedman is not a particularly pathological fellow. He is simply saying what all US imperialists (in effect, the entire US state, the Pentagon and the US media – the US ruling elite/oligarchy) believes. It’s just that US imperialism only works by constant lying to the proles and telling them that it does not exist, because if they caught wind of it, well, it’s so dirty and nasty, many Americans might just vomit a bit and say no thanks.
      So the imperialism needs to be covered up as missile shields against Iran (Poland), stopping Russian expansionism (Caucasus), fighting the Muslims (Central Asia), and democracy spreading (color revolutions). The suckers, including most liberals, swallow it hook line and sinker. The Democratic Party is an imperialist party, not quite as bad as the Republicans, but pretty bad. Obama is an imperialist President.
      US imperialism is covered up by denial. No one admits that it exists. If you say it does, like me, everyone shuns you or laughs you out of the room. Even the liberals, who are BTW behind Friedman’s imperialism all the way because they have been brainwashed into doing so.
      The US media is essential here. The media is an essential factor in US imperialism. It exists to brainwash the public to go along with the goals of imperialism and it does so very well, since few Americans question the media. And much of the “alternate media” is even more imperialist that the MSM (rightwing protest Tea Party media).

  6. ” Libertarianism is more or less what holds in the 3rd World. It’s just ultra-capitalism with a minimal to nonexistent state to protect the people from the capitalists.”
    Well Robert, I don’t know your views on ‘metapolitical’ issues, but I think this is the end result of the kind of thing the US has been promoting since 1776. This idea of extreme individulism and individual rights that makes anything that is not completely centered on the self unnatural. Hence the state is unnatural because it is in many way collective and not individual. If a person has the money he should be able to act as sociapathic as he wants because it’s his money and he has no responsibilty to others. Thirteen year old children can have abortions without their parents knowing because it’s their “right”. People can generally do horrible and disgusting things to each other because the “why should your morality affect me” attitude. After all, as Margaret Thatcher says, “There is no such thing as society.”
    The other thing behind much of this is the idea of the scientific society. The idea that you can quantify and design the society that you want. You may be able to change something, but there will be unintended consequences. Also, this change may have to be quite bloody and destructive. I believe that this is where many of our modern ideologies (capitalism, communism, fascism) come from. I don’t believe that any societies could be called any of these types of states outside of those in the “west” that have existed in the last 200-250 years. Even this is questionable for many depending on what you call “the west”.

  7. Rob, you just admitted in your recent posts that the Ayn Rand Objectivist libertarian fucks are a bunch of Jews. The PNAC imperalists are a bunch of jews. And surely you know that George Friedman is a kike. As a leftist, I’m assuming you’re against imperialism and economic libertarianism. Why do you still smear people as “anti-Semites” when I or somebody else brings up these blatantly clear facts up? Why do you still carry water for the hook-nosed rodents when its clear that the great majority of them are on the side of things you claim to hate?

  8. Haven’t read Ayn Rand. Not interested. New York, Woody Allen, Jew hate for Europe/peasant Asia, 1950’s, all of that Jew York talky grotesqueness. Objectivism sounds like Jewish attempt to co-opt Nietzsche, Hitler’s boy.
    Fountainhead, LOL. Lot’s o’ dem Jews bustin’ their nuts on Ayn Rand. Just jacking off to her picture. Thanks, but no thanks.

  9. It’s not only imperialism that the US is dependent on. Despite their “minimalist-state” rhetoric, capitalists in the US are in reality totally dependent on state support for their survival (the recent Wall Street bail out being just one egregious example). US capitalism can not survive without “corporate welfare”, the biggest component of which is military spending, the biggest single item, I believe, in the US budget (which ties the whole thing up with US Imperialism). Libertarians say they will completely get rid of corporate welfare once they achieve power, but I doubt that they will be true to their word in the unlikely event that they do assume power.

  10. Libertarians also like to throw in the “drug” agenda, to look cool to impressionable college students.
    As you also said, extreme capitalism needs imperialism, yet Ron Paul wants to pull out of the rest of the world. That doesn’t make any sense.

    1. Yeah it is not going to work. Actually I have been to a lot of the Objectivist forums who are followers of the major Objectivist philosophers. I thought they would be isolationists but really they are the most vicious neocons of them all. Attack Cuba, attack Venezuela, attack Syria. Really pro-Zionist too.
      That is when I started thinking that this isolationist Libertarian thing is just not going to work. You are either out to colonize the world or cooperate with the world. Pulling out is not an option.

Leave a Reply to fpy3p Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)