"Joys of Muslim Women," by Nonie Darwish

Some of this stuff is a bit over to the top, and I edited out about 15% of the text that I thought was complete crap. Nevertheless, most of what remains seems to be true.
Some of the stuff I removed: that Muslims are preparing a jihad against the West, apparently to convert us to Islam? I don’t agree with that. They think some of us are attacking Islam, so they are counterattacking. Another line said that in 20 years, there will be enough Muslims in North America to elect the President and Prime Minister of the US and Canada. No way is that true. It isn’t really true that non-Muslims are supposed to be killed or subjugated by Muslims, though there is a bit of truth to that.
Under Muslim rule, non-Muslims are clearly subordinate. But where Muslims are the minority, that is not the case. Muslims are supposed to try to convert and increase their numbers so they can be a majority.
Apparently conquest in the name of Islam – aggressive jihad – we have not seen that much in recent years. One exception is Southern Sudan. There have been some genocides of non-Muslims too – Greeks, Assyrians and Armenians in Anatolia, Catholics in East Timor.
In areas with a Muslim majority trying to secede from the state, it’s typically “kill the non-Muslims.” This is the case in the Southern Philippines, Thailand, the Moluccas, Chechnya and Kashmir. There have been localized massacres of non-Muslims in India, Iraq, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
Muslim jihad is a complicated subject, and saying they want to kill us or convert us is a bit ridiculous, though that was more or less what was going on South Sudan, and there have been some cases of that in Iraq and Pakistan recently.

Joys of Muslim Women

by Nonie Darwish

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 7 year old, consummating the marriage by 9. The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.
To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses. Often after a woman has been raped, the family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives ‘at will, and the man does not have to say why he has beaten her.
The husband is permitted to have 4 wives and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.
The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.
In the Western World (America), Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending US and Canadian Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to Shariah law.
Ripping the West in Two. Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

Ripping the West in Two

Nonie Darwish recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.
Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to the US in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza.
When he died, he was considered a “shahid,” a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.
But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.
In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law – what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.
Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world. Peace and prosperity for one’s children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.
While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics – one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.
While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.
It’s hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.
While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.
It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful…some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam…the peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

24 thoughts on “"Joys of Muslim Women," by Nonie Darwish”

  1. Funny you do not believe what she is saying when in REALITY she is correct and you are not nearly as knowledgeable…..you need to learn more about TRUE ISLAM and you will see she is 100% CORRECT and you are being deceived..look up TAQIYYA/KITMAN and learn more about ISLAM if you think she is wrong…
    YOU ACTUALLY SAID THIS..”Some of the stuff I removed: that Muslims are preparing a jihad against the West, apparently to convert us to Islam? I don’t agree with that. They think some of us are attacking Islam, so they are counterattacking.”
    WRONG they are not counter attacking US they are acting on GLOBAL JIHAD as can be seen in France, UK, Thailand,Philippines etc..long before we ever were in this WAR on their soil…We are just now getting attacked this jihad has been going on for many years..and America is not the cause..ISLAM and its conquest to rule the world is the cause..so learn more and if you are going to use NONIE and her info you should be smart enough to KNOW that she lived the life and she knows much more about the goal of ISLAM than you will ever get because you do not want to see the TRUTH apparently..

    1. I pretty much lose all respect for “Western” people who use terms like “proud kafir” or “infidel” or whatever. You are not brave. You are not edgy. You are just some loser attaching themselves to something far bigger than themselves to feel important, with little ability to do much else.
      Oh, and try going back to school and getting your G.E.D. It might help with your atrocious writing style.

  2. Muslims seriously need to internalize the saying “when in Rome, do as the Romans do.”
    Sooner or later, even the most pathetic of these sentimental “let’s hold hands” liberals are going to say “enough is enough” and stop bending over backwards to accommodate these types.
    Granted, I don’t spend too much time focusing on Muslims. There are certain other groups for which I have far greater disdain.
    That being said, can’t say I’m thrilled about their presence in the West.

    1. They can’t. They are fanatics. By definition, fanatics do not live in reality, whatever that reality around them may be. They see the world through an extreme singular lens. Mind you, so does Darwish, just from another extreme angle.
      Darwish reflects ever so much the black and white form of linear thinking that the “Muslims” she so hates(or is paid to hate) reflects. It is very much ingrained in the Arab mind. Hang around Arabs of any background, and you’ll see what I mean.
      As for Muslims taking over the U.S…What a load of shit! 😀

      1. “As for Muslims taking over the U.S…What a load of shit! ”
        Well, we have one as president. On Friday he goes to mosque and on Sunday he goes to Jeremiah Wright’s church. On Saturday he goes to synagogue to get instructions for the next week.

        1. Well, we have one as president. On Friday he goes to mosque and on Sunday he goes to Jeremiah Wright’s church. On Saturday he goes to synagogue to get instructions for the next week.
          So…He is Judeo-Christian-Islamic? The only one that really matters is the Synagogue, anyways. 🙂
          He kills 30 or 40 Afghan Muslims a day, and I doubt he even gives it a second thought. He’s about as “Muslim” as he is “socialist.”

        2. On the other hand, considering the people he’s appointed and the people he takes orders from, it wouldn’t be entirely irrational to think that Barack’s real last name is “Obamaberg.”

        3. “On the other hand, considering the people he’s appointed and the people he takes orders from, it wouldn’t be entirely irrational to think that Barack’s real last name is “Obamaberg.””
          Sure, but he’s not that much different from Bushenstein I and II or Clintonowitz.

        4. Sure, but he’s not that much different from Bushenstein I and II or Clintonowitz.
          Although in fairness to Bush Sr, he actually did publicly challenge the Israel lobby (ie. He told Israel that it had to guarantee an end to settlements/the prohibition of recent Russian Jewish settlement in the West Bank it it wanted to receive U.S. loans)
          Of course, Jews flipped their yarmulkes, the Israel lobby ultimately prevailed over him, he lost a shit load of Jewish votes (it went from 38% in 1988 to only 11% in 1992), etc.
          Still, he at least actually challenged the Jewish lobby. Same with Gerald Ford (though he sadly was also defeated in that regard).
          While I don’t like Republicans, at least in the past, conservative Republicans have been more willing to challenge the Jewish lobby than Democrats.
          Jews basically own the Democratic party. Jeffrey Blankfort would even go so far as to say that without Jewish money, the Democratic party would go bankrupt.
          If you think I’m full of it, consider that the Democrats haven’t appointed a SINGLE white gentile for their last 7 appointments to the Supreme Court.
          As Pat Buchanan points out, they’ve appointed one black (Thurgood Marshall), one Hispanic (Sonia Sotomayor), and five Jews (Arthur Goldberg, Abe Fortas, Clintonowitz’s appointments Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, and last but not least, our favorite fat lesbian Elena Kagan).

        5. “Although in fairness to Bush Sr, he actually did publicly challenge the Israel lobby”
          True. I’m probably too hard on Bush I because he’s caught between retard offspring and a guys with Alzheimers. (Alzheimers….sounds jewish!!!) He was the only one of the three with a fully functioning mind. If I remember correctly he even opposed his own son’s spaz out in Iraq back in 2002 & 2003. How did his son get to become such a retard? I remeber one documentary I watched in the late 90s or early 2000s about Bush II. It said that his mother gave him a thesaurus as a gift once to use at school. On a school paper he wanted to write that “a boy had tears running down is face” but he decided to get out his thesaurus and find a fancier word. He changed it to “the boy had lacerations running down his face”. How much of a dumb ass can you be? I was only in my early teens when I watched that and I knew that was totally incorrect. I guess he just found voters dumber than him. I guess it’s the old saying, “In the land of the blind, the man with no brain in king”.

        6. Dubya was an idiot, which is what allowed him to be manipulated by his neocon advisers.
          The second war in Iraq shouldn’t be seen as Dubya’s war, but Paul Wolfowitz’s war.

        7. “The second war in Iraq shouldn’t be seen as Dubya’s war, but Paul Wolfowitz’s war”
          So Dubya was a Wolfowitz in sheep’s clothing?

  3. Robert, I have some serious problems with “Darwish,” even though I myself am no fan of Islam. In fact, I think folks like this are doing more damage to the cause, than anything else. Let me list them in a case-point order, since it makes it easier for me to put them down on paper.
    1- Darwish reflects a large circuit of “Arabs” and “Middle East/Islam experts” who hit the airwaves running in the post 9/11 time period. Most have shady pasts loaded with discrepancies and outright lies, and all are on the Israeli/American Zionist payroll. Regardless of what useful truth they might bring to the table, and they can bring some, it tends to get washed out in their other absurd claims. They are paid to spread fear, and that is what they do. Their ethnic background only adds to the plate-ability with Western audiences, since after all, they cannot be accused of being racist. Themselves of their audiences. They are Arabs, and thus insiders, so they MUST be in the know. Wafa Sultan, Walid Shoebat and Irshad Manji all come to mind, and all are proven liars about their pasts. Complete bullshit artists, and not even good ones at that. In the case of Darwish, I doubt she was ever a Muslim to begin with, or even Egyptian. Her name and physical appearance would dictate a Christian Arab of Lebanese/Syrian background.
    2- Darwish, as well as much of her contemporaries in the Islamophobia circuit all have very pro-Israel/Zionists stances. As such, they lose ALL street credibility with Arab populations, regardless of religious background. They exist purely to entertain and American/European audiences, and that is by design. They aren’t going to change the Arab World or Muslim World or whatever. No, they are only here to help convenience Americans and Europeans to wage endless wars in “those parts” all for the sake of Israel…All the while we are increasingly bankrupted by the day.
    3- These people turn into complete assholes once they begin speaking outside of their “comfort zones,” i.e the Arab World. Their knowledge of anything outside of it is laughable, as is their credentials and knowledge of scientific and military matters that they love to delve into. They are given a script, and they repeat it, not really comprehending what they are actually saying. They may know about Arabs, but nothing makes me cringe more than hearing Darwish or Sultan or Hirsi Ali or Brigitte Gabriel talk about “those Mullahs” in Iran, or “that Taliban” or what not. They sound less than clueless…But people eat up what they have to say. From a White, Westerner’s standpoint, they are of the right “race,” I suppose.
    4- In the end, I guess my ultimate beef with these folks is that they lack any nuance. It is that simple. To them, everything is black and white, and they are preaching to an audience that increasingly thinks in those same terms.

      1. Thanks man. I ain’t no friend of Islam, and in fact have some real beefs with many of it’s hardcore followers. I’ve actually lost family.
        The problem is, these folks such as Darwish are not the solution to the problem. It requires both a modern reformation of Islam itself, a massive social awaking in the Arab World(the real problem at the heart of the matter) like such as is starting to take place in Latin America, and a Western World that takes into account that there is a real problem with fanatical Muslims, but a the same time, many of our current actions are increasing the problem exponentially instead of stemming it.

  4. I hate islam. Anything that makes middle eastern hotties cover up is definitely a load of crap.
    Hooray for christian arabs:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tk7pIJyMSE
    Also, hooray to this woman for making a decent pop song. Normally pop songs are just a bunch of garbage and not worth a second, or first, look, but I actually like this one.

  5. In areas with a Muslim majority trying to secede from the state, it’s typically “kill the non-Muslims.” This is the case in the Southern Philippines, Thailand, the Moluccas, Chechnya and Kashmir.
    The eternal Muslim victimhood.
    Muslims get killed because they instigate conflict by attacking the non-Muslim populations and instigate an ethnic cleansing campaign and conduct guerrilla warfare camouflaging themselves in civilian populated areas using them as human shields while getting Billions of dollars worth of support from Muslim countries lead by Saudi Arabia.
    With the Bosnians the conditions that lead to war which has now been revealed was abuses by the Bosnian government itself on its own Muslim population and false flag terrorist attacks to instigate conflict and gain western sympathy.
    Look at Iraq the Muslims are the ones with the militias carrying out kidnappings and terrorist attacks while the Christians are being massacred.

      1. @Bay Area Guy
        Hard not to notice that the EU and largely Jewish personalities and individual’s in Europe and the US helped create a fascist Islamic terrorist state in the “heart of Europe” as Lantos would say whose government official Hasan Cengic through CIA/British agent Osama Bin Ladin and his MI6/CIA terrorist front NGO in Austria the Third World Relief Agency (TWRA) transferred money to the 9/11 hijackers in Washington and New York in the US especially when we are supposed to be fighting a global “war on terror”.
        http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/ftv-da050908.htm
        KSM and other 9/11 hijackers stayed in Bosnia.
        http://slobodan-milosevic.org/news/dani012709.htm
        Cleric in Bin Ladin Afghan 9/11 proof video fought in Bosnia just like every single other terrorist.
        http://slobodan-milosevic.org/news/dt071404.htm
        US officials accused of undermining Bosnian crackdown on ex-mujahidin
        http://slobodan-milosevic.org/news/gs061109.htm
        Financing of Terrorism in BiH: Financial Center of Terrorism Is in Sarajevo
        http://slobodan-milosevic.org/news/patriot092004.htm
        How and where exactly was the Madrid bombing financed and organised?
        http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/dfasa062105.htm

    1. “The eternal Muslim victimhood.
      Muslims get killed because they instigate conflict by attacking the non-Muslim populations and instigate an ethnic cleansing campaign and conduct guerrilla warfare camouflaging themselves in civilian populated areas using them as human shields while getting Billions of dollars worth of support from Muslim countries lead by Saudi Arabia.”
      The eternal jewish victimhood.
      Jews get hated because they instigate conflict by attacking the non-jewish populations and instigate diversification programs and conduct psychological warfare camouflaging themselves in innocent populaces using them as human shields while getting Billions of dollars worth of support from jewish run countries lead by Israel/USA.
      …………
      I guess they are brother semites. To some degree they sound like the USA destroying the middle east for decades and then playing victim when the middle east struck back on 9/11. Hmmm, why would the upper levels of our government act like a bunch of jews? Hmm…..

      1. Hmmm, why would the upper levels of our government act like a bunch of jews? Hmm…..
        Gee Wade, spit it out! I can no longer bear the suspense! 🙂

      2. @Wade in MO
        I guess they are brother semites.
        Who do you think is supporting all these Islamic terrorist/separatist movements?
        http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/American_Committee_for_Peace_in_Chechnya
        Do you know who Morton I. Abramowitz is?
        http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Morton_Abramowitz
        On Thursday in Washington Ilyas Akhmadov the exiled foreign minister of the separatist regime who is a NED scholar and receives thousands of dollars annually in grants free housing, medical care, travel expenses, etc in US government funded grants gave a presentation of his new book Chechen Struggle: Independence Won And Lost under the auspices of the National Endowment for Democracy.
        http://www.network54.com/Forum/84302/thread/1295902986/last-1295902986/Ilyas+Akhmadov+%28exiled+foreign+minister%29+releases+NED+funded+book

      3. @Wade in MO
        To some degree they sound like the USA destroying the middle east for decades and then playing victim when the middle east struck back on 9/11.
        With exception of the establishment of Israel which there has been larger and far more bloody conflicts and ethnic cleansing in the establishment of new states before and since the creation of Israel and the Iraq wars covertly supported by Arab states like Saudi Arabia how exactly has the US destroyed the Middle East?
        If it were not for US backing the regimes would have all collapsed and would not have built there billion dollar dictatorships propped up by the US.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *