The problem with moral superiority from a race realist perspective is that in my opinion, probably 80 So morals are not a good variable to use when deciding if some race is inherently superior to another race or not, and I’m not really interested in doing that anyway. Let’s take Mexican Indians. Second generation ones here act downright horrible. They’ve settled into a “culture” that is only somewhat above that of ghetto Blacks. However, if you go back to a small village in Mexico or Guatemala and find folks with more or less the same genes, they probably act very, very good. Small Mexican villages often have excellent morality and almost zero crime. Blacks in general in the US are morally inferior to Whites, but if you to Africa and find small villages, you may well still find cultures that work very well, have little or no crime and have excellent morals. Those Africans probably have genes that look a lot like the genes of US Blacks. If anything, the US Blacks are a lot Whiter, yet their behavior is orders of magnitude worse. So I would consider those African and Mexican Indian villagers to be morally on a par with Whites. They’re not a lower race at all. You can see now where I have a hard time seeing morality as coded into the genes. My point though is, “Who cares!” Who cares why US Blacks and Hispanics have low morals relative to my great, morally superior White people? Is it in the genes? Is it in the culture? Is it a combination? Who cares, and why does it matter. All that matters is that they have low morals, and that’s all we need to know, right?
Please follow and like us: