We have some commenters repeating the usual anti-Semitic crap of Judeo-Bolshevism. It’s time to put and end to this once and for all.
Jewish Bolshevism or Judeo-Bolshevism from Wikipedia.
Of particular interest, Jews in the Bolshevik Party.
As I said, there is not one Communist anywhere on Earth who believes in Judeo-Bolshevism.
The only people who believe in it are:

  1. Anti-Communists
  2. Anti-Semites
  3. In the vast majority of cases, a combination of 1 and 2.
Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

0 thoughts on “Judeo-Bolshevism”

  1. LOL!!!
    ” It’s time to put and end to this once and for all”…….by quoting Wikipedia!!! LOL!!! Even you have said that there is serious bias at wikipedia in the past, especially where jewish issues are involved. If I had written something like that on a paper my professors would have laughed me out of the room. Wikipedia is a nice, quick, easy psuedosource, but it is certainly not definitive.

  2. The only people who believe in it are:
    1) Real historians
    2) Jews
    3) Everbody of importance
    And claiming Rosenberg was the first to link Jews and Communism is a lie as everyone from Kaiser Willheim to Winston Churchill in his famous article linked Communism with Judaism.
    “A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief – even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.”
    -Kaiser Wilhelm II (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)
    “There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every bit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”
    -Winston Churchill (“Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)
    Wikipedia article does not list Jews represented in the Gulag prison system, NKVD and other important government bodies and Jews changed their names to cover their Jewish identity and does not factor in those that had Jewish wives.

  3. The territory of the USSR would have been much better off if Admiral Denikin and the White Army triumphed. Under the Whites, the Russian Empire could have been an Orthodox, fascist, industrialized superpower. The rot of Marxism proved itself in 1991, after which Jewish oligarchs raped the Russian economy.

  4. Hmm… I’m less convinced now than I was a few years ago that there isn’t some substance to the label ‘judeo-bolshevism’, but I haven’t seen any evidence that the October ‘bolshevik’ revolution was a pre-meditated jewish coup. I doubt that the Russian peoples would have been better off if the whites won. Who can say? It certainly seems that the decision to resist counter-revolution had its merits. They had to decide, one way or the other, and I believe (because I haven’t checked it out thoroughly) that the decision for the Bolsheviks to seize power was arrived at democratically and legitimately, though that may have been the last democratic thing about the bolsheviks, the rest arguably being dictated by circumstance.
    I think I read somewhere that the middle-classes and the Tsarist bureaucracy wouldn’t co-operate with the revolutionary government, so I surmise that there would be a desperate need for literate, numerate cadres with administrative skills, and the jews would fill that niche. Anyone got any ideas on that? If the middle-classes weren’t behind it, I think that raises some questions re the legitimacy or practicality of the bolshevik program, but as I said they had to make a decision – basically surrender to the counter-revolution or seize power.
    I need to read up on this more. I’m not sure which books to trust – certainly not Trotsky. I’ve got quite a range of books on the revolution – sometime I suppose I’ll have to plough through them all to make up my own mind. Marc Ferro’s been recommended to me – any thoughts on him?
    Solzhenitsyn’s a crank, and not to be taken too seriously, but I’ve read the chapter in his ‘banned’ book on the role of the jews in the camps; maybe there’s more, but what I’ve read so far is actually quite fair and balanced – I think it’s been grossly mis-represented by the more rabid anti-semites. Kevin Macdonald’s Occidental Observer blog published some chapters – you can read them there.
    This stuff about the jews trying to wipe out the Russian Christians is just barking mad shite though – not even as plausible as a conspiracy of alien lizards. There isn’t a shred of evidence for that; nor for ANY kind of bolshevik mass murders.
    But, if no jewish coup, it seems to be pretty well documented that the jews became well entrenched in the upper echelons of the Soviet Union, and duly pulled their usual jobs-for-the-boys shit. I’ve only read about a third of Slezkine’s ‘the Jewish Century’ so far ( got interrupted and keep finding other things to read) but that’s an impeccably kosher source, well-documented, that describes jewish dominance of the USSR, though slightly dented by Stalin.
    I think there’s a case that the REAL jewish coup was in 1989 not 1917. I don’t need to spell that out.

    1. There is a book by a Jewish revolutionary that was involved in both the act of 1905 and 1917 but abandoned support of the Bolshevik revolution when it started into a mass massacre.
      In the Social Storm: Memoirs of the Russian Revolution by Boris Yelensky
      It is more complex than just it was a Jewish conspiracy it is more like British lead intelligence operation to organisation the collapse of the Russian empire and stop Russian advancement into Central Asia like British Jewish banker Jacob Schiff and all his effort to weaken the Tsarist government and cancel special US-Russian trade deals allied countries both had since the end of the US civil war and political pressure promoting “democracy” like the establishment of the Friends of Russian Freedom organisation and others like American Jewish Committee lead by Schiff and British/American/Jewish interests in Germany.
      Jacob Schiffs autobiography by Cyrus Alder with good background info.

  5. Jews were historically always used as disposable middlemen by the European ruling classes. This is the essential historical theme underlying almost all European anti-Semitism (excepting the earliest form, which is best treated in Charles Freeman’s Closing of the Western Mind, and was specifically religious). The prevalence of Jews in the early Soviet Union, when other nationalities lacked the education to be depended on for apparatchik jobs, followed by an eventual late-Stalinist purge specifically targeting Jews (once gentile replacements became available), seems totally consistent with this. The Soviets traditionally always had the slimy philo-Semitism of a British imperialist, protesting on and on about how much they loved Jews and regarding anti-Semitism as uniquely ugly and different among violent bigotries (on this see Gorky and Khrushchev, or Battleship Potemkin). If you’re a Tatar (the largest Russian minority), you’re out of luck; if you’re a Jew you’re special if absolutely nothing else. That’s not racial tolerance, that’s prioritization.
    Also Hitler’s conviction that Bolshevism as an abstract value system was “Jewish” (dealt with in “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin and Irving’s recent translation of notes about a personal exchange in which Hitler begs for money from a diplomat) was arrived at philosophically, not by tracing names on a chart, and the subsequent Nazis who insist on going by Jewish-sounding Gentile names (endemic in Eastern Europe) are misunderstanding their own leader.

    1. The Schiff official biography is very interesting which details the length he went to and connections he had in the US, England and Japan to support Communism against Russia.
      There is also a book called Undiscovered Russia written by Steven Graham in 1912 who travelled across Russia that debunks the myth of doom and gloom historians and Communists portray peasent life of pre-revolutionary Russia.
      Online html version.
      Its on Google books but I don’t know how you download it.

    1. What is also true is that many Jews were ‘forced’ into the Bolshevik party by lack of other alternatives (joining the corporate world, zionism, the white army didn’t trust them etc.). Thus they may have fought side by side with Bolsheviks, but not every Jew was a good Leninist-Stalinist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)