Is There Something Wrong with Gay Men?

See here, here and here (NWS! Actually, not safe anywhere!) Careful, those links are really gross porn that will make you want to hurl.
This is actually a great big huge scene with gay men. 4-8% of gay men are into scat, either playing with it or eating it or both. What’s the % of straights, male and female, who are into such a thing? It must be very small. How many straights would rent a bar to engage in such sickening behavior? I can’t imagine it. Most straights are fairly normal sexually.
The more you read about the prevalence and intensity of extreme perversion among gay men, the more you start wondering if there actually isn’t something wrong with them somehow. What the Hell is the matter with queers? It’s like they are fucked in the head or something. Why are queers so sexually twisted? I don’t get it.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

0 thoughts on “Is There Something Wrong with Gay Men?”

  1. As a liberal I’m a bit surprised to hear you throwing the word “fag” around. But anyway….I’m by no means an apologist for gay behavior. I tolerate them and I’m amicable with them, but I find the thought of two men engaged in sex, even if it is loving to be gross on a personal level. Now where does the stat come from about what percentage of gay men are involved in fecal smearing sex? I can guarantee you that pretty much any perversion you see gays doing you’ll find straights doing. Japanese porn is the most mind-bending of them all. Those links you posted here look tame compared to the Japanese straight porn.

    1. I once heard a story from a friend (who was temporarily living and going to school in Japan) about how an elderly/middle aged Japanese man was blasting porn in front of a 12 year old on a public train.
      From what I’ve read and heard, the Japanese are kinda crazy.
      I don’t get it. The Japanese are so intelligent, successful, and organized, and yet they’re some of the most neurotic and perverted people on the face of the earth.

      1. “The Japanese are so intelligent, successful, and organized, and yet they’re some of the most neurotic and perverted people on the face of the earth.”
        I’ve heard the same about the Germans. Maybe it’s an Axis thing?

      2. Maybe it’s an intelligence thing as well.
        Jews are incredibly talented, successful, and creative.
        And yet they’re also some of the world’s most neurotic and perverted groups, as evidenced by their gross overrepresentation in pornography and other vices.
        Well, I guess there is no genius without a touch of madness.

        1. “And yet they’re also some of the world’s most neurotic and perverted groups, as evidenced by their gross overrepresentation in pornography and other vices. ”
          Yeah, just look at Ron Jeremy. He’s probably the only jew who could see his dick past his nose.

        2. The Chinese and Koreans are on par with Japanese intelligence and I’m not aware of much of any porn scene there. At least nothing coming close to what you have in Japan.

  2. I wouldn’t call usury, financial swindling, and other bullshit “creative.” More like destructive virus eating at society’s vital organs. The kikes don’t even have a glorious civilization to boast about. Ancient Judea was a shithole desert kingdom constantly getting its ass handed to it by Assyrians, Romans, Egyptians, etc.

    1. Well, I’m mainly looking at this from an American perspective. In the U.S., Jews are indeed the most successful group, and highly represented in the creative industries, as evidenced by their control of hollywood, media networks, etc.
      While very critical of Jews, I have to give credit where credit is due. They are indeed a very intelligent, creative, and successful race.

      1. Successful, yes. But most certainly not creative or intelligent in a positive sense. They are subversive, parasitic, and good at deceiving others. The Third Reich was a great example of how much a nationa can accomplish in a such a short time if Jewish influence is totally weeded out.

        1. The Third Reich was a great example of how much a nation can accomplish in a such a short time if Jewish influence is totally weeded out.
          I’m no expert on German history, including the internal dynamics of Nazi society.
          I would just advise you that if you want to persuade people of Jewish power and influence, invoking the 3rd Reich isn’t a good way to go. If people think that to curb Jewish power requires going Nazi, they’re going to be naturally repulsed.
          I think that you have to point to other solutions to curbing Jewish power and influence.
          Besides, I detest Hitler and Nazi Germany. He slaughtered millions of his fellow white Europeans, ushered in the decline of Europe and increased immigration and multiculturalism in the European continent, created the whole holocaust industry/gave Jews an atrocity that they could exploit, not to mention the fact that the Frankfurt School fled Germany and came to the U.S.
          I don’t think that I need to go into why the Frankfurt School was bad.

    2. The kikes don’t even have a glorious civilization to boast about. Ancient Judea was a shithole desert kingdom constantly getting its ass handed to it by Assyrians, Romans, Egyptians, etc.
      Judea was indeed a shithole. At the same time, the Kingdom of Israel was much wealthier and more successful.
      That being said, you’re right. Besides the Kingdom of Israel’s glory days, Jews don’t really have a nation they can point to, besides that which was artificially created by the U.N., and because of massive U.S. aid.
      While not a religious man myself, the bible was right when it said that Jews would be “wanderers among nations.”
      Something tells me they enjoy being wanderers among nations. Otherwise, why not move to Israel, where they don’t have to worry about that oh-s0-dreadful “anti-Semitism?”

  3. All those things were the result of Germany losing. And the only white Gentiles to really suffer from Hitler were Russians. On the other hand, there were many French, Dutch, Norwegian, etc. volunteers for the SS and army during the war with the USSR.

    1. All those things were the result of Germany losing.
      With respect, Germany was the one that initiated the war and attacked everyone else.
      (not like the allies were innocent, either. They bombed the shit out of Hamburg and other German cities)
      Why did Hitler have to attack France and other Europeans countries? Why did he shed the blood of his fellow whites?
      Goddamn Neville Chamberlain. Not only did you embolden Hitler, you also allow contemporary Jewish neocons to use your capitulation to justify aggression against Middle Eastern states that Israel doesn’t like.

    2. “All those things were the result of Germany losing.”
      I don’t think so. Honestly, I don’t think the world would be better had Germany won. I don;t believe the nazis carried the essence of German civilization. The got a large ride because of World War I resentment, but I don’t know if Germans in earlier times would have voted for them, even if they were jew haters. Even Hitler didn’t get a majority of votes. If given a choice between Nazi Germany and the Holy Roman Empire I would go with the empire any day of the week. Now there was a great state and culture. Fuck Hitler and fuck Prussia.
      And the only white Gentiles to really suffer from Hitler were Russians

      1. “And the only white Gentiles to really suffer from Hitler were Russians”
        I didn’t mean to put that in the last post, but in this one.
        I guess the nazis completely destroying Warsaw doesn’t count as suffering. I guess the gentiles forced in to slave labor in Nazi factories doesn’t count as suffering. I guess v2 rockets landing on a family’s homes in London doesn’t count as suffering.
        Think before you write.

        1. @Wade in MO
          I think he means by numbers killed although I think more Belarussians were killed either a 1/5th or a 1/3rd of the population.

        2. I guess the nazis completely destroying Warsaw doesn’t count as suffering.
          Thank you. 2 million ethnic Poles killed, and half a million ethnic Ukranians and Belorussians.
          Himmler: All Polish specialists will be exploited in our military-industrial complex. Later, all Poles will disappear from this world. It is imperative that the great German nation considers the elimination of all Polish people as its chief task.
          Indeed, fuck Hitler.

  4. The reason Hitler invaded other countries was geopolitical. He wanted a united Europe under German leadership to take on the Soviets.

    1. Well, I’m no WWII expert, so I don’t feel like arguing.
      That being said, can you deny that the result of WWII was quite disastrous for white gentile Europe?

  5. “This is actually a great big huge scene with gay men. 4-8% of gay men are into scat, either playing with it or eating it or both”
    Yet another reason why the homophobia of the black community is so odd. You would think that putting a long, dark black cock in your mouth would be like eating a turd. I guess a long black thing going up your butt is a lot more painful than one coming out though.

  6. Wade, what do you have against Prussia? And Britain and France declared war on Germany first, over a matter of no concern to them? Kinda like the neocons today. Hitler was the ONLY Western leader in the 20th century to stand up to the fucking filhy hook-nosed shyster pricks.

    1. “Wade, what do you have against Prussia?”
      Bismarck’s anti-catholic Kulturkampf and his anti-austrian activities. One of the few good things to come out of WWII was that Prussia was completely erased from the map. Fuck the German Empire, bring back the Holy Roman Empire!
      ” And Britain and France declared war on Germany first, over a matter of no concern to them?”
      Yes, Britain and France are total hypocrite countries. It’s so funny to hear the Brits talk about keeping the Germans from taking over the world while everyone knows that they controlled about 1/4th of the world at the time.
      “Hitler was the ONLY Western leader in the 20th century to stand up to the fucking filhy hook-nosed shyster pricks.”
      Well, I don’t kow how much I agree or disagree with this. In the centuries before, many western leaders were jew-wise without going nuts and committing genocide. While Hitler was anti-jew, his nazi movement might have cause just as much cultural damage as the jews might have or more.
      In many ways Hitler through the jews the ultimate bone.
      I think that there is another major problem with this statement though. You are assuming that the jews are the only crooks and that they only getting into places with massive resistence from the current populations. The opposite is true in the english speaking world. The anglo-saxon elite have largely decided to lay down in bed with the jews since before WWII. They cause just as much if not more trouble for nationalists and other anti-capitalists. We could probably even use the term “Anglo-jewry” to describe them. Which none jews are the biggest zionists? The US. Which region of the US is the most zionist? The south, where the largest percentage of anglo-celtic descended americans live. What country in Europe is the most zionist? The United Kingdom. The same trend could be shown in many english speaking areas. Personally, I think that its somewhat connected to the types of protestantism that are popular in English speaking countries. There have been groups within english speaking areas for a long time that have taught that the english are the descendents of the lost tribe of Israel. Also, one of the main tenents of many evangelical groups is that all the jews have to be in Israel before the second coming of Christ occurs. It goes for beyond zionism though. Much of the early international finnacial elite was originally anglo-american. I don’t believe that the jews had any influence in founding certain organizations such as the Federal Reserve.

      1. Being the ass-fanatic and obsessive that I am (John Stagliano is a kindred spirit), when showering my gf’s butt cheeks with many kisses, and in the throes of passion I have to admit to shoving my tongue per ano on a number of occasions.

  7. Wade, I am in no way excusing Anglo-Saxons from working together with the kikes. In fact, I am very Anglophobic. Fuck Anglo-Jewry!

    1. I just find it so maddening that Jews continually seek to weaken and undermine WASPs, in spite of the fact that WASPs have been their biggest supporters and enablers in history.
      Are blacks, Hispanics, and other non-whites going to subscribe to holocaust guilt or love for Israel? Fuck no. Do you think they’re going to be afraid of charges of “anti-Semitism?” Push comes to shove, no.
      Jews wish for the destruction of white America. Well, all I’ll say to them is, “be careful what you wish for.”

    2. “In fact, I am very Anglophobic”
      I am becoming more that way to, which is sad because I actually like England, at least pre Henry the VIII catholic England. Lately I often find myself being extremely anti-american. I don;t go too off the wall talking about it because there are veterans and government workers in my family and I really don;t feel like getting into a screaming match. I have become somewhat more vocal though. I think you have to ease people into these things. It took me years to break with orthodoxy completely. At times I was even afraid to go to certain websites because of the fear instilled in america’s youth. Frankly, I think we can give up on the baby boomer generation. Most of them are fucking hopeless.

  8. BAG, I believe if white Americans CHOSE to cater to Jews and lick their ass at every moment, they deserve whatever fate comes their way, including demograhpic displacement.

    1. I believe if white Americans CHOSE to cater to Jews and lick their ass at every moment, they deserve whatever fate comes their way, including demograhpic displacement.
      Sadly, I must agree.
      That being said, when trying to reach out to my fellow whites, I certainly wouldn’t use that rhetoric, for it comes across as defeatist and masochistic.
      Granted, I do rant on this blog every now and then, but I comment on this blog for personal reasons. If I were talking to other whites in real life, I would change my tone.
      Somehow, I just don’t think that saying whites deserve whatever happens to them will inspire confidence and assertiveness on the part of white Americans.
      I agree with Hunter Wallace (the guy who runs Occidental Dissent) when he says that white activists should personalize the issue as opposed to going on esoteric ramblings about “the Jews.”
      I think that focusing on individuals like Abe Foxman, George Soros, Elena Kagan, Ben Shalom Bernanke, AIPAC, etc, will suffice. In other words, demonize these specific individuals and organizations, and point out that they are responsible for many of the problems in their lives by subtly saying “hint, hint, they’re Jewish!”
      Sooner or later, they’ll make the connection. They just need to be pushed in the right direction.

  9. By the way LaFleur, the Jewish Commies murdered more Ukrainains, Poles, Russians and Belarusians than any that were murdered by the Germans.

    1. “By the way LaFleur, the Jewish Commies murdered more Ukrainains, Poles, Russians and Belarusians than any that were murdered by the Germans.”
      I may be going a bit off topic here, but I question the level of jewish involvement in the Soviet Union. I have no doubt that in the late tsarist period and the early soviet union there was significant jewish involvement. I really question the amount of jewish involvement during and after the Stalinist period. I pretty sure the Soviet Union wasn;t down with zionism. They even created a jewish area within the Soviet Union called the Jewish Autonomous Oblast as an alternative to zionism. Just because the Soviet Union was controlled by hostle non-Russian minorities doesn’t mean that they were jews. Stalin was Georgian. Lenin was a mongrel. Khruschev was a Ukrainian. It was him who took away the Crimean Peninsula from Russia and gave it to Ukraine. There are more examples, but you’ll have to research them. I don;t pretend that the jews are some innocent victim group, but I don;t believe that they;re the only source of evil in the world.
      On an interesting side note, the Soviet Union almost did away with many of Russia’s traditional enemies. It sent the Crimean Tatars and many enemy Caucasian peoples to Siberia. In the end it was also encouraging Russian immigraiton to the Baltics in order to ensure a Soviet hold on the area, which has caused many problems recently. The relationship between Russia and the Soviet Union is quite interesting. Somewhat like that between England and Great Britain.

      1. @Wade in MO
        It is interesting how the early Soviet government was not just Jews but like modern Islamic terrorist groups inter-related through brothers, sisters and wives like Kaganovich and Trotsky (Bronstein).
        http://www.seanbryson.com/articles/prop_masters.html
        Apart from Stalin who is said to have had a Jewish mistress (probably not true) virtually all the non-Jewish individuals had Jewish wives like Khrushchev.
        Lenin had Jewish ancestry whose grandfather Israel Blank was Jewish.
        “Lenin, whose maternal grandfather, Israel Blank, was Jewish, said that Jews made the best revolutionaries: “The clever Russian is almost always a Jew or has Jewish blood in him.” (Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New Biography, p. 112). Lenin was both clever and a revolutionary. He was surely referring to himself.
        Researcher Wayne McGuire of Harvard University writes: “Lenin was a Jew by the standards of Israel’s Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent. It would seem that not only was Lenin a Jew, but that he was a Jewish racist and chauvinist, although he kept his ideas on this volatile subject far in the background, probably because they were in radical conflict with the supposed universalism of Marxism. …Lenin was a Jewish racist who deliberately gave Jews especially, the most ‘intellectually demanding tasks.’ He admitted that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the south and west of Russia was comprised of Jews.”

        Wasn’t really until the late 60’s especially the 6 day war that Jewish involvement in the USSR decreased and by then they had switched to organised crime.
        As for traditional minority groups targeted by the Soviets like the Crimean Tatars that is because they were heavily percentage wise involved in anti-Soviet warfare first supported by the Nazis then after WW2 US and Britain as stay behind guerrilla units launching warfare.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cossacks,_Crimean_and_Caucasian_volunteer_units_in_German_forces

  10. Yeah Wade, Oliver Cromwell totally Judaized Britain, after he murdered the traditional Catholic monarchy. Same with the French Revolution. And of course the filthy Communists murdered the Tsar and installed a Jew-Commie tyranny. Hitler was the only man who saw through these cretinous vermins.

  11. Wade, if you read Kevin MacDonald’s articles on Solzhenitsyn on the Occidental Observer, you’ll see that Jews were an elite group in the USSR until at least 1945. After the war, Stalin tried to purge them, but he was poisoned by them and died in 1953. And of course, in 1991 the USSR collapsed because of the Jews remaining in the system and because of the idiocy of Marxist ideology.

  12. Robert, you have to consider that male/male sexuality is naturally going to be different from male/female sexuality because of the differences between men and women. Men are intensely sexual beings. In hetero relationships, women provide some balance to a man’s sexual drive. In gay male relationships, there’s no such balance, so you’re obviously going to find more extreme activities.
    For the record, I am gay, and I’m also a racialist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *