The Nigger Jokes Will Be the Last Thing to Go

Lot of Whites are down for a good nigger joke.
Sure White Republicans are, but so are a lot of White Democrats. I even know White liberals and Leftists who tell them.
On the horrible but hilarious Niggermania site, the author has an anecdote on his About page. First of all, he says he’s never met a White person who isn’t down for a good nigger joke, at least when the doors are closed and no one can overhear.
He did aver that he had met one young White liberal who was offended by nigger jokes. The site author invited the guy over to his place, and they sat around with his friends and got drunk on beer. The author’s buddies started in with the nigger jokes. As the liberal got drunker and drunker, he started laughing harder and harder. Pretty soon he was whipping out his own large repertoire of nigger jokes which he had apparently kept hidden. Everyone had a roaring drunken good time.
This anecdote is telling. There a bit of racist inside most White people, even liberals. It’s just that it’s hidden a lot better among some types as it is among others.
Blacks need to pick and choose among Whites between the more or less racist. I would suggest that Blacks choose the less racist. If Blacks demand anti-racist purity, they won’t end up knowing many White people. And the Black person will get unnecessarily angry
Anyway, the nigger jokes will be the last thing to go.
I think Blacks should work on the really important aspects of White racism and save the BS like nigger jokes for the last, when most of the ugly stuff is dealt with.
Hell, the nigger jokes may never go away. It seems you can’t stop humor. People have been laughing since the beginning of our species.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

18 thoughts on “The Nigger Jokes Will Be the Last Thing to Go”

  1. “This anecdote is telling. There a bit of racist inside most White people, even liberals”
    Racism being defined as honest observer, with a sense of humor, and not a total doormat for the PC crowd. In other words, racism being defined as normal humanity.

    1. Racism being defined as honest observer, with a sense of humor, and not a total doormat for the PC crowd. In other words, racism being defined as normal humanity.
      Co-sign, Wade!
      I think that if a white person ISN’T racist against blacks, there’s something wrong with him.
      Racism is a very natural part of humanity.
      (yes, I know my Critical Race Theorist friends, “race is just a social construct,” etc. Then again, ALL IDENTITIES are “social constructs,” not just race. Therefore, racism/ethnocentrism/bigotry are indeed natrual parts of the human condition)

      1. In a nutshell, while the concept of race is a fairly modern concept from the standpoint of world history, bigotry and the notion of “the other” and “us against them” has been with humanity since the beginning of time.
        Traditionally, these markers were based on ethnicity, culture, and overall tribe.
        To me, race is just the newest of these markers that signify “the other.” and since being ethnocentric and disliking “the other” is a natural part of humanity, racism is indeed natural.
        And if one were to argue that “well, race is just a social construct, so racism is not natural,” well then, you’d have to abolish ALL social markers, because they too are also “social constructs.”

        1. “To me, race is just the newest of these markers that signify “the other.” and since being ethnocentric and disliking “the other” is a natural part of humanity, racism is indeed natural. ”
          Yeah I agree with this. One of the problems of the white nationalist movement is that they’re too into genetic purity. When humans were developing they knew their own by culture, language, religion, and ,yes, looks. However, no one thousands of years ago know shit about genetics. If a guy in northern Europe was 5% of ‘black’ ancestry and didn’t look anything like it, no one would be able to tell. Are you going to tell me that if Rashida Jones was put up for adoption and raised by a white family ( and not named Rashida) that people could tell that she is of about 1/3rd black ancestry. I doubt it. Somewhere down the line one of her descendents might pop out with a black feature or two but I doubt anyone would notice.

        2. People aren’t born racist anymore than they are born religious. You’re spewing bullshit. And to say that something is wrong with someone if they are NOT racist shows just how sick of a person you have become.
          If racism is natural, then how the hell do you have trans-racial adoptions where the kid loves his other-race parents as if they are his own? A kid that is born into a mixed-race family doesn’t even place any significance on the fact that his mother and father are of difference races. It only becomes an issue because society chooses to make it one.

        3. People aren’t born racist anymore than they are born religious.
          Tulio, you’re missing my point. I’ve pointed out before that I actually agree with the CRT’s that race is “a social construct.”
          But guess what? So is EVERYTHING else. Being Chinese, being Japanese, being Jewish, being Muslim, etc, is a social construct.
          My actual POINT was that bigotry is indeed a natural part of the human condition, and depending on the established social groups present at the time, it is indeed natural to become bigoted against them.
          And to say that something is wrong with someone if they are NOT racist shows just how sick of a person you have become.
          *sniff*
          Too bad, so sad.
          Personally, I prefer being racist to being a self-flagellating, PC liberal wimp.
          If racism is natural, then how the hell do you have trans-racial adoptions where the kid loves his other-race parents as if they are his own?
          Yeah, well you’ll notice that these adoptions are very rare. Also, you’ll notice your fellow CRT’s and anti-racists frequently complain about how white parents don’t know how to raise adopted non-white kids.
          Besides, Tulio, there will always be INDIVIDUAL exceptions to the rule. Even I, of all people, have a FEW black INDIVIDUALS as friends.
          A kid that is born into a mixed-race family doesn’t even place any significance on the fact that his mother and father are of difference races.
          I don’t know about that.
          I’ve observed that mixed-race kids are actually conscious about their racially mixed status. Either that, or they choose to identify with one race over another, like most mixed black/white people.
          It only becomes an issue because society chooses to make it one.
          I know, if only society were wonderful and there were no markers dividing different groups, we could all just live together in peaceful rainbow.
          Sorry, but racial markers ain’t going away anytime soon.
          You’re spewing bullshit.
          No, sir, that would be you.

        4. “A kid that is born into a mixed-race family doesn’t even place any significance on the fact that his mother and father are of difference races”
          Actually many have ‘identity crisises’ caused by being mongrels. Just look at Obama. He didn’t really feel black so he joined a black nationalist church and calls his grand mother a ‘typical white person.’ The there’s the mongrel Farrahkhan. Don’t need to explain anything there. I’ve also heard of elevated social pathologies among half-breeds.

        5. Yeah, I have to agree with Wade here.
          What I’ve noticed is that most mixed race kids either a) have an identity crisis or b) identify as one race over another.
          For example, Obama resolved his identity crisis by identifying solely as black.
          Granted, there are some mixed race kids who are indeed comfortable with their identity. But you don’t find too many of them, and I’ve noticed that the most comfortable mixed race kids are part white/part Asian.

        6. “My actual POINT was that bigotry is indeed a natural part of the human condition, and depending on the established social groups present at the time, it is indeed natural to become bigoted against them.”
          The “natural condition” you are speaking of is simply called the survival instinct. People tend to ally with those that they think they most the most in common with if they feel they are threatened by “others” who they have less in common with. That is where bigotry and all other forms of hate arise from. When whites only had whites to deal with, the British fought the French, the Scottish highlanders fought the lowlanders, The Catholics fought the Protestants, the Romans fought the Saxons, the Vikings fought damn near everyone they encountered, etc etc. If everyone on earth was the same race, we’d be fighting each other over something else like ideological differences such as communists vs capitalists. Words such as “pinko” would become like “nigger” in an all white world. My point here is that when you say something is “natural”, you are implying that there is biological basis for it. There is no biological basis for racism. It’s learned behavior and we can look back in history and see where originated as an ideology. There was no equivalent of the KKK in the ancient world. Wherever two “races” met, there tended to be a transition zone. That’s why the people of central Asian look part Caucasian and part Mongoloid. That’s why people in the horn of Africa look part Negroid and part Caucasoid. That’s why most people in Latin America are mestizos. If there was biological motives for racism, none of this would happen.
          “Personally, I prefer being racist to being a self-flagellating, PC liberal wimp. ”
          Fallacy of false dichotomy. As if being a racist and being ultra-PC are the only two options available. As if there aren’t a range of sensible temperaments between these two extremes. Your problem is that you’ve devolved into an ideologue and made reason your enemy.
          “Yeah, well you’ll notice that these adoptions are very rare. Also, you’ll notice your fellow CRT’s and anti-racists frequently complain about how white parents don’t know how to raise adopted non-white kids.”
          Funny. Race realists and racists have no problems using the Minnesota transracial adoption study when arguing for proof of lower black IQ. Funny how there seems to be plenty of transracial adoptions to draw valid conclusions from when it comes to THAT.
          “I’ve observed that mixed-race kids are actually conscious about their racially mixed status. Either that, or they choose to identify with one race over another, like most mixed black/white people.”
          You don’t seem to have the ability to distinguish between inborn behavior and learned behavior. Look dude, I have close personal experiences to draw from. My sister, a black woman is with a white man. They have a biracial daughter. I take it neither of your siblings if you have any are married to blacks, so I think I know a little more about the subject than you do. My niece has never even brought the word color up and seems to see no distinction between her white family and black family. Nobody even talks about race with her, so I guess that’s the reason. I for one have no interest in ever bringing it up to her as there are a million other things I’d rather talk about with her.
          And no, nobody has to CHOOSE ONE race over the other. The example of Obama was brought up. Once again, SOCIAL CONSTRUCT. A kid has no natural inclination to choose one over the other. Racist white society created the *one drop rule* that LEGALLY COMPELLED people like Obama to identify as black . He could could have called himself white but he wouldn’t have been accepted as such. Laws on the books made him black. Secondly, this isn’t the case elsewhere. The people in South Africa that called themselves “coloreds” don’t identify as black or white, even though they’d be considered “black” in America. And same with Latin America. A mulatto Brazilian does not choose black or white as his identity, but mulatto, or whatever the equivalent word is in Portuguese. Europeans scratch their head and can’t understand why Obama is referred to as black. This silly concept only exists in this shell called America.
          “I know, if only society were wonderful and there were no markers dividing different groups, we could all just live together in peaceful rainbow.
          Sorry, but racial markers ain’t going away anytime soon. ”
          There will always be variations in features between humans, but we don’t have to hate each other based on them nor attach any judgement to them. Hitler didn’t consider Slavs to be white. He wanted to kill them…well he DID kill many of them. Now Slavs are regarded as just another type of whites and people wonder what the hell Hitler was fussing about.

        7. I’m getting tired, so this will be my last comment.
          @ Tulio
          The “natural condition” you are speaking of is simply called the survival instinct. People tend to ally with those that they think they most the most in common with if they feel they are threatened by “others” who they have less in common with. That is where bigotry and all other forms of hate arise from.
          My point exactly.
          If everyone on earth was the same race, we’d be fighting each other over something else like ideological differences such as communists vs capitalists
          No doubt, but at least we could fight over these differences without being called racist.
          (granted, other accusations, such as “pinko commie” would arise, but I’ll take that over CRT lectures on “white privilege” any day)
          My point here is that when you say something is “natural”, you are implying that there is biological basis for it. There is no biological basis for racism. It’s learned behavior and we can look back in history and see where originated as an ideology.
          Granted, racism, BY ITSELF, is not natural. But racism’s close cousin, bigotry, is indeed part of the human condition. While race (as well as all other social markers) are social constructs, they were all created by the same impulse known as ethnocentrism.
          Therefore, racism, as well as other isms, are indeed natural parts of the human condition. Later on in the future, another ism will arise, and yet another, as history has proven.
          This may be regarded as a faulty analogy, but here goes. I’ve recently started playing Starcraft 2, and I’ve gotten increasingly competitive with my friends, and have increasingly been studying the game and watching pro-matches in order to get better.
          Granted, I wasn’t born a Starcraft 2 player, just as I wasn’t born a racist. But my love for competitive gaming and strategy led me to playing Starcraft 2, as well as other RTS games.
          Therefore, you could say a natural part of me resulted in me gravitating towards such games, even though those games themselves were created by gaming industries (the gaming equivalent of “society”).
          Fallacy of false dichotomy.
          Hey, I see someone else has taken a logic course!
          However, I learned that it was “false dilemma!” 🙂
          As if being a racist and being ultra-PC are the only two options available. As if there aren’t a range of sensible temperaments between these two extremes.
          Well, the only other possible viable option, in my book, is becoming a liberal race realist like Robert. I’ve considered that, but for me personally, balancing being an anti-racist with being opposed to anti-white Cultural Marxism is a bit too much of a balancing act for me.
          I could also just ignore race, but then I’d be living in denial.
          Then, of course, I could become a self-loather like Timmy Wise.
          Or, I could maybe even become a reasonable anti-racist like Thad, but I think it’s safe to say that anti-racism is out of the question for someone like me, with my experiences and worldview.
          So, do you have any better alternatives?
          My niece has never even brought the word color up and seems to see no distinction between her white family and black family.
          Really? I find that interesting, and difficult to explain.
          But alas, you seem to answer my question for me…
          Nobody even talks about race with her, so I guess that’s the reason.
          Just as I thought. It’s easy to avoid dealing with an issue when you ignore it.
          The people in South Africa that called themselves “coloreds” don’t identify as black or white, even though they’d be considered “black” in America. And same with Latin America. A mulatto Brazilian does not choose black or white as his identity, but mulatto, or whatever the equivalent word is in Portuguese. Europeans scratch their head and can’t understand why Obama is referred to as black. This silly concept only exists in this shell called America.
          That is interesting.
          I’ve always wondered why in the U.S. of all places the One Drop Rule came about.
          My guess was that since whites were the large majority, they could exclude all racially mixed people and maintain their white power structure with ease.
          In Brazil and the Caribbean, since the slaves outnumbered whites, not imposing the One Drop Rule and giving certain bones to mulattoes was probably a way of using them as a buffer against black slaves.
          Well, that’s my take. If there’s someone with a better historical source on this matter, I’d like to see it.
          But Tulio, I think you make a mistake when you look at racial mixing in Latin America and then use that to prove that racism only seems to appear natural in the U.S.
          As Thad and Ana Paula have pointed out, at least in Brazil, racial mixing was actually used as a racist strategy. The idea was that if whites kept mixing with blacks, the black phenotype would eventually die out.
          Race mixing in Brazil and other parts of Central and South America are not necessarily signs of tolerance, but rather the historical methods of racial control were different in those places.
          There will always be variations in features between humans, but we don’t have to hate each other based on them nor attach any judgement to them. Hitler didn’t consider Slavs to be white. He wanted to kill them…well he DID kill many of them. Now Slavs are regarded as just another type of whites and people wonder what the hell Hitler was fussing about.
          You know, that makes me think.
          Speaking of Starcraft 2, maybe we humans just need an external enemy to unite us.
          Hey, a Zerg invasion ought to do the trick! We whites, blacks, browns, and yellows will all unite as humans and kill those Zerg scum 🙂

        8. I remember a study being released recently finding that Eurasian kids actually have higher levels of depression than both pure whites and pure Asians. So it would seem that all of the mixed populations have some probems. I think much of this stems from the traditional American notion of “racial” difference, in which society of as being divided into mutually exclusive “races” (widely regarded as sub-species) with (relative) purity being equated with authenticity. Under these conditions, it’s easy to imagine that racially ambiguous people will have some “identity” issues. This is not an inherent difficulty of being mixed race, though. I doubt that mixed race people in Latin America have these sorts of problems for a coupel of reasons. First, most of those countries have mixed race majorities. Second, they tend to think of “race” as being a continuous variable rather than a binary or discrete one. Thus mixed race people have a recognized place in the social order, as those falling closer to the middle of a continuum with Europeans on one end and Africans/Amerindians on the other.

        9. “I’ve always wondered why in the U.S. of all places the One Drop Rule came about.”
          I wonder how representative the one drop rule really was of american views on racial issues. My understanding is that it was never a national law and only developed in a few southern states and really wasn’t historic. Most one drop rules only came about in the early 20th century and only in limited areas. Other kept their old classifications of people with small amounts of black ancestry being white. Also, for the most part the one drop rule only applied to blackness. I heard indian blood was part of laws sometimes but not often. I don’t think asian blood was ever mentioned, but I don;t know much about California laws.
          I often wonder how much one drop concepts are blown out of propoation by well placed members of the black establishment. After all, if you’re running an organization to unite blacks under your influence then wouldn’t you want to make yourtarget group as large as possible? Then people “on the margins” could see your rise as their advantage and become supporters and financial donors instead of being hostile to your “cause.” You could rake in a lot of money and get priveleges for yourself and your family being a race leader. It may even help you overseas. I’ve heard american blacks call brazilians and other blacks based on the one drop rule despite the fact that racial laws were almost totally different in these countires and one-drop rules make no sense. The do this to form overseas alliances to rake money of governments in a large racketeering scheme disguised by the “one-drop mythology.”
          Also, I think that the one drop rule give many half breed mongrels a sense of identity. Jamaican Marcus Garvey could see the light skinned WEB Dubois as a “white man’s nigger” but under the one drop rule Dubois became as black as him. The same is true for people like Obama, Jeremiah Wright, and Farrakhan. Probably for Thurgood Marshall too.
          If their were no one drop rule much of the black political and econoic class would be left without a large base to organize and exploit, hence it must be maintained at all costs.

  2. Take away my social security?
    Fine.
    Take away my health care?
    Fine.
    Take away my civil liberties?
    Fine.
    Take away my nigger jokes?
    Now you’re gonna die. Not even niggers can steal my nigger jokes.

  3. And to say that something is wrong with someone if they are NOT racist shows just how sick of a person you have become.
    I must say that tulio is correct with this statement.
    In BAG’s favor though, this is the standard line of all WN types, and it’s also very commonly used by garden variety White guy next door racists when you call them on their racist shit : “Racism is normal. Everyone is racist. The abnormal people are those who are not racist.” Most all racists use this line to try to normalize their racist BS.

  4. The Word Nigger is a perfectly fine word by itself. Its the race asshole who using it that we have to worry about. Its all about contense. nobody gets offended when Eddie Murphy and Richard Prior use the word Nigger. You know why? cause their Niggers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *