Obama Caves in Again

One cave-in after another. Do Republicans ever compromise on anything? Of course not.
Obama’s nothing but a Republican. Fuck you, Barack! Obama makes me want to vomit. He’s just another asshole corporate Democrat. There’s nothing socialist or certainly Communist about him. It’s way worse than that. He’s not even a liberal!
I say let all the tax cuts expire.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

0 thoughts on “Obama Caves in Again”

  1. Well Robert, it time to come to terms with the fact that the left in this country has been kidnapped by the bourgeosie.
    I know I posted this article here before, but I’ll post it again because it’s interesting. My favorite part is this paragraph,
    “In a perceptive work, Sognando la rivoluzione: La sinstra italiana e le origini dei sessantottanti, the Milanese political historian Danilo Breschi shows how Communist youth organizations and workers’ strikes fell into the hands of what the old cadre called “decadent bourgeois adolescents.” While those who showed up for strikes in the 1960s in Turin, Genoa, Milan, Bologna and other cities in the northern industrial belt were self-proclaimed anti-capitalist radicals, recruited from Catholic Action, Trotskyist factions, and ethnic minorities, for the under-30 demonstrators, the real agenda was more ambitious — but also more feasible. It was a social-cultural transformation to be engineered from above. Longtime advocates of Marxism, like film-maker P.P. Pasolini and Marx-scholar Lucio Colletti, raged against these usurpers, and they called for ousting them from respectable leftist gatherings. Colletti went so far as to call the police to eject these “decadents” from his office; and Pasolini saw their agitation on the Italian Left with growing apprehension and referred to their statements as a “verbal disease.” ”
    http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/how-the-left-won-the-cold-war/
    That quote is about Italy, but the same thing happened in the US. (Maybe even to a worse degree)
    The real left has been wiped out by these “decadent bourgeois adolescents.” The can promote all their faggot parades and anti-white agendas while managing to still hold on to the largest part of their paycheck. Lets face it, most of these motherfuckers are upper class anyway. How many faggot pride parades have you heard of in Appalachia? Compare that number to Manhattan or Northern California.
    Tim Wise and the other bourgeosie adolescents on the “new left” make all this cultural marxist “anti-racist” ruckus, but at the end of the day they will go back to their large houses in rich neighborhoods and dictate to the rest of the world how to live. He will push for affirmative action programs to attack “white privelidge” but his kids will not be affected to them. It has been shown that the current AA regime has it’s worst effect on poor, not rich, whites.
    As for me, I’ll stay a populist. I closed my eyes and voted democrat in 2010, but that was the last time that will happen. I refuse to vote for anymore anymore decadent bourgeosie adolescents and their multicultural faggot parades. I’m sick of it.

    1. The real left has been wiped out by these “decadent bourgeois adolescents.” The can promote all their faggot parades and anti-white agendas while managing to still hold on to the largest part of their paycheck. Lets face it, most of these motherfuckers are upper class anyway. How many faggot pride parades have you heard of in Appalachia? Compare that number to Manhattan or Northern California.
      Tim Wise and the other bourgeosie adolescents on the “new left” make all this cultural marxist “anti-racist” ruckus, but at the end of the day they will go back to their large houses in rich neighborhoods and dictate to the rest of the world how to live.

      Could not have said it better myself, Wade.
      The economic left has been subverted by the Cultural Marxist left. And speaking of Tim Wise, he lives in a nice house worth over 600k (keep in mind, he purchased his house a few years ago, and I’m guessing that’s a lot more money in the South than in the Bay Area).
      Yeah, I think he knows a thing or two about “privilege” indeed. But notice, he’ll be the LAST person to give up his nice house or cushy job, while simultaneously telling whites that they need to make sacrifices.
      What a piece of shit.
      He’s representative of what went wrong with the left.

      1. ” he lives in a nice house worth over 600k (keep in mind, he purchased his house a few years ago, and I’m guessing that’s a lot more money in the South than in the Bay Area).
        Yeah, you can probably buy the south for 600k. In the midwest that would even be pretty big. In the more populated areas of California 600k will get you a house that would fit right in one of Rio’s favelas and neighbors that would fit right in a mexican barrio.
        And really 600k? His house only costs 600k and this motherfucker tries to call himself a jew? POSER!!!

        1. He’s not even a real Jew.
          At the VERY MOST, he’s only 1/2 Jewish, on his FATHER’S side. I’ve also read some articles of his a while back that indicate he’s only ethnically 1/4 Jewish.
          Something tells me that he just plays the Jewish card so he can get “oppression cred.” Just as he plays the white trash card in order to claim that, in spite of growing up poor, he still benefited from “white privilege.”
          But anyone who’s seen him speak has pointed out that he simply does not have a clue how to reach out to white working class people.
          Something tells me that Tim is a pathological liar.

        2. The way I see it Wade, Timmy should put his money where his mouth is.
          He rails about how we need affirmative action, whites benefit tremendously from housing discrimination, whites make more money because of racism, etc.
          Well, if Timmy wants to set an example for us backward white people, he should be the FIRST person to give up his nice house. Oh, and he should also give his handsome speaking fees to a much more deserving “person of color.” Oh, and since he hates the U.S. empire so much, he maybe ought to spread some of his handsome speaking fees to oppressed “people of color” in 3rd world countries while he’s at it.
          But will he do that? Of course not, for the mantra of the Cultural Marxist left has always been “do as I say, not as I do.”

    2. I refuse to vote for anymore anymore decadent bourgeosie adolescents and their multicultural faggot parades. I’m sick of it.

      So do I, and I too am sick of it.

  2. I think Obama is on the left at heart, but one can’t govern American from the left. It’s just not politically feasible.
    I tried to give him a chance, but I’ve come to the conclusion he will go down in history as a very weak and ineffective president. I think people like Obama as a person and he seems less corrupt than what we’ve had before, but he’s just not aggressive enough. The Dems just grab their ankles and take it from the Republicans every time. People so wanted to believe that Obama would the antidote to 8 years of Bushism, that he would bring things to the table that have been ignored for nearly a decade. Here it is going into 2011 and we don’t even have “don’t ask, don’t tell” settled and Guantanamo still hasn’t been closed. Why are these issues still dragging on?
    I’m not one of these people that blames Obama for everything. I don’t think the fucked up economy is of his doing and I don’t think there’s much more he can do but let it run its course like a bad flu. No matter who is in office, I think economy would be in the dumps. So I’m blaming him for that. But I feel like there is little leadership right now. It seemed like he charged out of the gate like a stallion but has run out of steam. It’s sad. I’d hoped the first black president would be a blockbuster. Maybe there’s still time.

  3. It’s sad. I’d hoped the first black president would be a blockbuster. Maybe there’s still time.
    I voted for the first black president 18 years ago and reserved any more Democratic presidential votes until Obama. I’ve never felt he had a chance to do anything groundbreaking or strike a strong presidential pose because it wasn’t scripted that way. The only thing remotely dangerous or historically significant about Barack Obama has been his name, sadly.
    “Let them have a faux black president,” they proclaimed, “but he must be gutted and neutered and devoid of any threatening Africanness.” We were fed a historically significant but pragmatically bland POLITICIAN. Win one, lose one.

  4. To Rob:
    I say let all the tax cuts expire.
    Yep I agree.. by the way guess who want the tax cuts to expire and wants to cut back on the US military spending (while talking about imperial over reach..)
    David Stockman.. former budget director under Reagan:
    Ronald Reagan’s budget director David Stockman throws a pitch fork into GOP traditional doctrine on taxes and defense.
    “For 30 years,” Stockman said, “both parties have been telling the public that we could have this massive government, 24 percent of GDP, all these programs, we could be an imperial power policing the world, and we don’t have to raise the tax revenue needed to support it.”
    http://parkerspitzer.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/10/david-stockman-heretic-or-truth-teller

  5. Dear Robert
    All those politically correct lefties who were overjoyed in November 2008 because the new president was a mulatto (not a black) should now realize how superficial they were. They put a man in the White House who has few strong political principles. It is this absence of strong poltical convictions which makes Obama such a weak leader. Paul Krugman was ecstatic after Obama’s victory but he criticizes Obama all the time now. That’s what happens when you think that skin color is so important. Obama is like olin Powel, another ambitious mulatto (not black) without strong principles who would not rock the boat and lied shamelessly to get the US military in Iraq.
    The left can win battles such as the one about gay marriage and gays in the military because they don’t affect the economic interests of the rich. I agree with Tulio that Obama’s preference is for economic leftism, but it is a weak preference.
    Obama has disappointed the genuine leftists but he is still excoriated by the hard right as a dangerous socialist. The hard right can’t be appeased until the US becomes a plutocratic paradise in which taxes are very low, regulations are few, labor is cheap and plentiful, and handouts are given only to banks.
    Regards. James

    1. I don’t think people were overjoyed simply because the new President was Black, actually. Many of them were overjoyed because of what it represented – that it was actually possible for race to take a back seat to more important issues.

        1. And also because Obama seemed like a fresh breath of air after 8 years of Bush. He was well liked globally, articulate, thoughtful, liberal, intelligent. Everything we thought Bush wasn’t. For many it was like a cathartic moment to go from a bumbling cowboy acting like a bull in a China shop to a man like Obama.

  6. Assange states about the world, ‘The west has fiscalised its basic power relationships through a web of contracts, loans, shareholdings, bank holdings and so on. In such an environment it is easy for speech to be “free” because a change in political will rarely leads to any change in these basic instruments. Western speech, as something that rarely has any effect on power, is, like badgers and birds, free.’
    You are more than free to advocate change. But it won’t happen. You have to strike at the system, like this – http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8179516/French-ministers-and-bankers-warn-against-Eric-Cantona-protest.html – a mass disengagement from the forces when depend upon our gullibility to grow and rule over us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *