World’s Top 100 Richest People

Here.

I’ve been asked to count the Jews. I did so with trepidation, almost shaking. I was afraid that there would be 60-70 of them as the anti-Semites imply. I thought for a moment and realized that if 60-70 of them were Jews, the vast majority of Jews would probably be shouting to the skies. Isn’t that kind of disgusting though? What kind of people would actually take pride in that much insane power and wealth domination of humanity? I wouldn’t want to be a part of any group like that.

Luckily for the Jews, and too bad for the anti-Semites, I only count 15 Jews on the list. There may be a few more. I figure that’s not so bad.

Whew. I feel like we dodged a bullet there.

With 15% of the world’s richest, how is it that the Jews control the world?

Incidentally, there were plenty of Arab, Mexican, Brazilian and Indian names on that list too. Counting those might be an interesting project.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

70 thoughts on “World’s Top 100 Richest People”

  1. If that is true, it means that Jew over-representation in both the Fields Metal (27%) and the Nobel Prize (22%) is more than their wealth over-representation.

  2. Most of the Jews I noticed in the list have out-married, so I don’t really care. You think Ballmer and Ellison are buddy-buddy? They hate each other.

    1. No, no. They are all allied. Protocol of the Elders of Zion. Federal Reserve.

      You see not the Jewish Behemoth for it’s monstrosity and calculation.

    1. You mean out of 400?

      Why would Jews be proud of this shit? I mean, do Jews get a check from Rich Jew Central every month the more zillionaires you have on the Top 400 Capitalist Pig list or what? I don’t get it. All these rich Jews aren’t good for the ordinary Jew, or are they? Do these rich Jews protect the Jews? Seems like all the do is drive the anti-Semites wild. I don’t see how the average Jew benefits from all this Jewish wealth. Seems like they are harmed by it more than anything else due to all the anti-Semitism they stir up.

      1. I don’t know if they are proud of it or what. I happen to think Krapner is telling the truth about his upper middle class synagogue, but there’s no way to tell.

        So are they proud of it, or ashamed of it, or do they not care?

        Considering how materialistic US Jewish society, one would think they think it’s tres cool. I was on the JDL website a while back, and they had a forum where all these people would write in, Jews, anti-Semites, everyone. There were quite a few poor to low income Jews who were furious at US Jews for their materialistic society.

        They get invited to functions, and everyone treats them like a loser if they’re not making a bundle. So even some Jews think US Jewish society is insanely materialistic.

        OTOH, US White Gentile society is really materialistic too. I don’t think I’d really want to be a Jew. I feel like bad enough as it is.

  3. If you ever need someone to pay for a lawyer, or medical care or in some rare cases they will help you with mortgages. BTW the JFCS apartments are much nicer than section 8 housing.

    1. Robert’s talkingthe the list of richest people on the planet, not the richest people in the United States, which is what I gave.. For the planet, 15-20% may be a reasonable number, but I haven’t gone through the Forbes billionaire list thoroughly, no I don’t know.

      United States has more rich Jews than anywhere else just because it has more Jews than any other nation (it has more Jews than even Israel). Jews in the US are over-represented in comparison with the world on other measures as well (for example, around 40% of US Nobel laureates are Jews).

      I think the wealth of the Rothschilds may be overblown by the conspiracy media in comparison with that of the nouveau rich around the world (Russian oligarchs, silicon valley tycoons, etc.)

      1. Well the Russian oligarchs themselves are heavily heebish. In fact, before Putin cracked down on them, they looted the Russian economy during the drunken 90’s when that douche bag cretin Yeltsin gave them carte blanche. And of course they then moved their wealth to London and Tel Aviv.

      2. David – that list I link to is the one YOU posted, of the WORLD’s billionaires, showing 139 jews in the top 400, 43 of them in the top 100. For reasons I give below I don’t think the general list of billionaires is that dependable, but it gives some indications at least. I think the wealth of the Rothschilds must be seriously UNDERstated. I know there are a lot of conspiracy theories and not much evidence, but I don’t see how a banking operation like that, so entrenched in international capitalism from the very beginning, and given the parasitical structure of banking and finance… I don’t see how they could fail to end up with EVERYONE owing them. How could they lose? The nazis no doubt took some gold off them, the French nationalised their banks… but money doesn’t work like that. In fact few really know how it DOES work, which is how the elites get away with it – it’s a confidence trick. Which highlights another thing about these lists: as Marx pointed out, commodity transactions mask social relationships i.e. power relationships; a Saudi prince may nominally have billions of dollars, but he’s totally dependent on the largesse of the US to keep it. The whole thing represents the usual balance of alliances and obligations always necessary for the powerful to wield power. So American jews with their well-honed political machine controlling the supreme US military machine get far more bang for their bucks.

      3. This is ridiculous. They are only 15% of the world’s richest. That’s a lot, but we can deal with it. If Jews were 40% of the world’s richest, you’d see a ton of anti-Semitism and maybe the rise of another Hitler.

        Swedes, 9 million, are 10% of the Top 100.

        Jews, 16 million, are 15% of the Top 100.

        Swedes are more overrepresented than Jews! I want some meatballs and pickled herring!

      4. This is ridiculous. They are only 15% of the world’s richest. That’s a lot, but we can deal with it. If Jews were 40% of the world’s richest, you’d see a ton of anti-Semitism and maybe the rise of another Hitler.

        Swedes, 9 million, are 10% of the Top 100.

        Jews, 16 million, are 15% of the Top 100.

        Swedes are more overrepresented than Jews! I want some meatballs and pickled herring!

        Swedes control the world, ya!

        1. APOLOGIES! SORRY! Yes, that list I linked to is the US billionaire list, not the world. But as I say below, 15 % is easily enough if their power is co-ordinated through a well-honed political machine and applied where it counts – to the US election process, giving at least ‘a big say’ in the application of the world’s supreme military machine.

        2. >Are those Swedes all Gentile? Or are they Swedish yids?

          I’m pretty sure they are all Gentile. There are only like 15 or 20 thousand Jews left in Sweden.

          Sweden has an extremely robust, competitive capitalist economy (regulated of course by state redistribution of income through the welfare state).

  4. 30% to 50% of US billionaires is the sort of figures I see in a wide spread of MSM platforms, including jewish ones (are there any non-jewish ones?). So 40% of the world’s richest is quite believable.

    These lists are only anyway of the people they can get figures for, and only the wealth they admit to ( heard of tax-havens etc?), and only of the ones that don’t threaten to disappear the compilers. Where are the Rothschilds? Where’s David Rothschild, you know the guy who that oligarch Khodorkovsky (or something like that – the one Putin jailed for interfering in politics) gave his looted billions to for safe keeping. Or the rest of them? Jacob Rothschild, custodian of the inviolable fortune passed on by the original godfather? Where’s the Queen of England? The Sultan of Brunei? The Duke of Westminster?

    How do the jews rule the world? Well, at 40% of the rich, it shouldn’t be too hard. How do the rich rule the world? How did a few thousand Englishmen rule India?

    How does it profit jews? Oh, that’s a hard one. Let me see… hey, how about it makes it a lot easier for them to get a job in academia, on a newspaper, in government, administration, banking, the movies….?

    1. how does it profit jews? Oh, that’s a hard one. Let me see… hey, how about it makes it a lot easier for them to get a job in academia, on a newspaper, in government, administration, banking, the movies….?

      I’m not going to touch banking, politics and the media (because you are probably right), but I don’t think you are correct for the sciences half of academia.

      Admission into and graduation from top science programs in the country is one of the most brutally objective and meritocratic procedures existing in our society.

      I know someone who received a doctorate in mathematics in the United States from a top-tier graduate program. Admission is essentially based on your GPA in math courses from college, and your performance on a specialized mathematics entrance examination. That’s it. All the Jew back patting in the world cannot guarantee admission to an unqualified applicant, because it is objectively determinable for such things as writing mathematical proofs when the person has no idea what they are doing, or is only marginally competent (the proof is simply incomplete or complete; it’s a yes or no proposition).

      What is your story then for heavy Jew over-representation in the hard sciences (mathematics, physics, chemistry, engineering, etc.)?

      1. I think you are right. I bet a lot of this is just down to high Jewish IQ, though I’m not certain.

        If Jews really are preferentially hiring and promoting their own, it means that qualified Gentiles are being passed over for hiring and promotion. I think the US Civil Rights Commission ought to take any of these Jews to task, if this is indeed what they are doing.

        I know for a fact that Jews do this Hollywood. It sucks, too.

        1. I’m taking a wild guess here, but I think it’s possible that the majority of Jewish preferential hiring in the United States (at least for secular Jews) takes the form of “aversive” or “goy-blind” preferentiality wherein if, between a Jew and Gentile, one is clearly more qualified, they will go with that one, but if the candidates are equal or close in qualifications they will usually side with the Jew.

          Hollywood and the entertainment industry seems like more of a crapshoot, because at least in professions such as law, finance, administration, and government there are at least some semblance of objective qualifications and/or examinations. I wouldn’t be surprised if Jews shamelessly promote their own in Hollywood. What is your personal experience with Jews in Hollywood?

        2. ” I’m taking a wild guess here, but I think it’s possible that the majority of Jewish preferential hiring in the United States (at least for secular Jews) takes the form of “aversive” or “goy-blind” preferentiality wherein if, between a Jew and Gentile, one is clearly more qualified, they will go with that one, but if the candidates are equal or close in qualifications they will usually side with the Jew.”

          Exactly. That’s how it must be. And that answers your question about the hard sciences. Of course incompetents won’t get through, but if there’s a spread of reasonably equally qualified candidates, the jews will be preferred. Likewise for research funding, publication in journals for peer review, and nobel prize nominations.

          This must work by top-down pressure through foundations and think tanks, and through making sure that ‘their people’ are in the right government and administration offices supposed to be ensuring fair practice, and of course through their undeniable hold over the whole political system.

          It may be that the jews ( the ones involved in this, the organised jews, not ALL who call themselves jews – I shouldn’t have to keep repeating that, but…) – deep breath – the jews have been shooting at an open goal, because the gentiles haven’t noticed until recently, or haven’t cared much, or realised that the importance of these areas that the jews have taken over.

          I admit that it’s a mystery to me why the jews now feel free to be so blatant about all this. Do they feel they’re home and dry now? There’s nothing we can do?

          ” I bet a lot of this is just down to high Jewish IQ, though I’m not certain.”

          There you go again. ARE the jews a different species, an evolution beyond Homo Sapiens? Can you link to any IQ comparisons that show this? The only appropriate comparison is between jews and gentiles of a similar class background, since jews, as is undisputed, have always occupied a range of economic roles which could roughly be called middle-class; not to mention their laudable nurturing of their own intellectual talent by schooling all their young in Germany and Eastern Europe, long before this became common practice for gentiles – so that even those ( and there are more than you’d think) who work in manual roles tend to be reasonably educated. (Yuri Slezkine (the Jewish Century) notes, and he’s not the first, that there is nothing unusual about an ethnic group occupying its own economic niche; he offers examples from Africa, India, S.E. Asian) . This cultural background therefore doesn’t necessarily advantage jews over gentiles, but locates them within specific economic/social demographics ( You know that AA to DD thing) – so the only valid comparison is with the rest of the demographic, not with the whole gentile US population. I would be surprised if comparisons show any great difference. If they DO, well that raises the question of how we protect ourselves against them.

          “If Jews really are preferentially hiring and promoting their own, it means that qualified Gentiles are being passed over for hiring and promotion. I think the US Civil Rights Commission ought to take any of these Jews to task, if this is indeed what they are doing. ”

          That’s it in a nutshell, as I keep saying. All this elaborate analysis of the jews’ ‘ Culture of Critique’ (Kevin MacDonald), or the insane quasi-mystical ruminations of the likes of E. Michael Jones with his ‘Jewish Revolutionary Spirit’ rejection of logos stuff, and even all the raking over of the historical record of the jews by the likes of Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon, not to mention the revisiting of the German nazis’ sword and sorcery fantasies by the likes of Stormfront – all this is just a pointless complicated diversion from what is a relatively simple matter.
          I excuse Shamir and Atzmon from the following, but the reason why the others have to get into such elaborations is the same reason the German nazis did; because they themselves are deeply committed to doctrines of racial supremacy, they can’t just point to the jews and say ” this is racism, stop it”.

          That’s it, plain and simple. I’m against white racism, black racism, any racism including jewish racism. (I don’t have a problem with ‘race realism’ as long as it recognises the historic and social factors contributing to the situation).

          I’m not well-verse in US anti-racist legislation, but if, as Robert said, if it’s the job of ‘ the US Civil Rights Commission’ , I’d take a bet that that body is almost exclusively jewish.

        3. Do I really have to spell it out?

          There is a genetically determined range of IQs which is not much different throughout the human race; the bottom of the range is of course brain death, the top I don’t know 160 or 180 if that means anything significant. But within that range much of what is tested for in IQ tests is culturally determined; those who grow up in an environment where words (written and spoken) and numbers and ideas and mental achievements are considered important do better in IQ tests because they’re more tuned into them than people don’t have this background.

          What kind of people DON’T have this background? Well, with the advent of universal schooling it’s levelled out a bit, but the aspirational tone of the home is important, and those who come from families who for generations have seen themselves as manual workers, ” no better than they ought to be”, ” Strong but silent”, with all those inhibitions about getting above your place, being too verbal – or just not really having much experience of ‘wordy things’ – those people will be a bit ‘at sea’ with IQ tests. These are ultimately ‘the workers’, the mass base of our societies, who do all the dull routine work that needs to be done. It is necessary, for their to be a society or a nation, that this strata should include possibly MOST of society. (note that there is nothing to prevent these people quickly raising their IQ if they should develop aspirations)
          Above this strata are the managerial, technical, entrepreneurial classes. This strata does better in IQ tests because it is more used to that sort of thing. This is where you almost always find the jews. The jews are not distributed around the demographics the way the gentiles are. They are a subsection of the middle-class.

        4. Before you jump in with something about IQ tests being tests of symbolic, pictorial reasoning or whatever, rather than wordy – that IS a wordy thing, discerning some logical pattern in the symbols, which the testee understands internally in a wordy way.

        5. The only appropriate comparison is between jews and gentiles of a similar class background, since jews, as is undisputed, have always occupied a range of economic roles which could roughly be called middle-class

          If the black-white IQ disparity is related at all to the jew-gentile IQ disparity (which it may or may not be), the difference would persist even when socio-economic status is controlled for, an in:

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TBC-BW-IQ-SES-withDiff.png

  5. Are those Swedes all Gentile? Or are they Swedish yids?

    The names look pure Swedish. Swedish Jews will have Jewish names, and there are not that many of them anyway, luckily for the Swedes. A few Jews go a long way. That’s why I don’t want to dismantle Israel. I don’t want all those Jews coming here. We have enough problems with Jewish power as it is, and all those Israelis will make things that much worse. It won’t be good for the Jews either. It could create some serious anti-Semitism in the US.

      1. Plus, aren’t many Israelis stupid Mizrahi Jews? I don’t think we have to worry too much about 90 IQ Mizrahis taking over.

      2. >Only more Jews flooding into this country will wake up the sheeple goyim.

        Lol, is that the Anti-Semitic version of exacerbating contradictions in preparation for the revolution?

        1. LOL.

          Heightening the contradictions. Yes.

          Sendero Luminoso was into that. They hated the Glass of Milk Committees in the slums for dampening the people’s enthusiasm for revolution. Crazy.

        2. It’s the Korean version of destroy the village in order to save the village.

          In the American village it’s destroy the village in which I don’t live in order to save the village.
          Wicked, but Darwinian right minded.

          In fpy’s version it’s destroy the village in which I actually live.
          Also wicked but not right minded under any schematic.

    1. The Swedes on the list are all ethnic Swedes. It’s noteworthy that the top Swede on the list – IKEA founder Ingvar Kamprad – was a member of a Swedish Nazi party from 1942 to 1948 .. yes, 3 years AFTER WW2 … that’s dedication! There’s hope for the anti-semites after all. He’s also an alcoholic, who goes cold turkey three times a year.

  6. I wouldn’t be surprised if Jews shamelessly promote their own in Hollywood. What is your personal experience with Jews in Hollywood?

    I’ve seen interviews with Hollywood directors who openly said that they preferentially hired Jews. The guy said, “Sue me!” What an asshole. There was an article about this in Vanity Fair a while back and the Jews went batshit nuts over it. Gentiles were taking to wearing Stars of David to interviews to try to increase their chances of getting hired.

    I never worked in the industry. I just hung out, mostly at rock n roll nightclubs with the punk rock crowd. Also to some extent with the art crowd, but that’s more a downtown Loft scene. I had some friends who worked in the industry as storyboard and comic strip artists and I went to a few of their industry parties. The parties were the “backstage” people, lighting, etc. stuff like that. There’s a whole army of nobodies backstage. No one ever mentioned Jews.

    You notice that the place is swarming with Jews, but they are these hip, secular, very liberal, party hearty type Jews. Not big on Jewish religion. No one says anything against Jews in Hollywood though. Everyone pretty much just sucks up to them and loves them. But Hollywood Jews are easy people to like. Really laid back, cool, easy going LA people.

    I went for one interview in the industry, but they never called back. The guy asked me if I was willing to work nude (porn I guess) and I said yes. LOL. I also had a lot of offers to get into modeling from people who ran agencies. I was too busy fighting off queers in Hollywood to worry about Jews. Hollywood is a great place to get women though. There are tons of single desperate women, and most of the guys are gay, married or drugs / alcohol / homeless type. Most of the chicks are NOT gay though. Basically a man shortage.

  7. Didn’t you just write that you did want to be a Jew? Which is it? Damn you’re confusing?

    I just want to pretend to be one. If I was a real Jew, anti-Semites would scare the living shit out of me. They scare me already, and I’m not even Jewish. Also, I don’t want to be part of that crap ultra-materialistic US Jewish culture. It’s quite clear that my fellow Jews would be calling me a loser all the time, in one way or another.

      1. There were a few times when anti-Semites thought I was a Jew and started sneering at me or jeering at me. One time I was in chat and this whole room turned on me and started threatening to kill me.Both times, I sort of turned into a Jew, and then I finally realized the terror that Jews might feel towards anti-Semites. I was literally scared shitless. I figure if you’re a Jew, anti-Semites could be downright terrifying.

  8. Most people that only know my name ( my real surname), or the nickname derived from it (that’s usually just in Glasgow), assume I’m jewish. To be honest, I can’t say I’ve really had any reactions except occasionally a jewish face lighting up – ” one of us”. But there have been a couple of times with surly muslims when I wondered if they had assumed I was a jew, and that was the problem.

    I’ve had a lot of jewish friends over the years, but I don’t mix with them much any more because, however much they agree with me about ‘those other jews’, I know they’re going to be putting it about behind my back that I’m a nazi, just because I advocate Nuremberg Law style restrictions on their activities.

    1. just because I advocate Nuremberg Law style restrictions on their activities.

      The Nuremberg Laws outlawed marriage and sexual intercourse between Jews and Germans, and stripped Reich citizenship from Jews. The citizenship aspect restricted them from voting or holding public office, and later restrictions building upon the Nuremberg Laws prohibited them from entering really any white-collar professions at all (teachers, professors, lawyers, doctors, public servants). The general purpose and effect was to exclude Jews 100% from German society at large.

      I can understand the restriction on holding public office, as well as the restrictions on entry into the financial profession, but doesn’t the rest seem a bit overkill? Couldn’t you have, for example, a quota on the maximum number of allowed professors or doctors or lawyers rather than banning them entirely? What is the point of forbidding intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles?

      This comes to another question. You expound rather loquaciously on the problems of the Jew in society, but this one sentence (or rather, clause) is the only hint I’ve had from you at some proposed solution.

      What do you think would be the precise status and restrictions put upon Jews in an “ideal” society? You mention the Nuremberg Laws, but do you really support them in their entirety? Do you think that it is possible that the Jewish Question may ultimately only be solved by their total eradication?

      1. I thought it was obvious I was joking. ” just because…”? Anyway ‘Nuremberg Law style’ is what I said. ‘style’ implies a not exact copy.

        But of course, there has to be an element of that. Accepting that there is a racist ‘conspiracy’ of this order (and a successful one), obviously raises the question of what to do about it. As I said above, you already have anti-racist laws, though I’m not sure what they are, and they’re obviously not that effective. And as I pointed out you Council for Civil Liberties (or whatever) will inevitably be almost exclusively jewish.
        It is obvious that in the USA powerful forces feel free to ignore laws against racist practices, as well as laws against just about everything else; so to an extent, the ‘jew problem’ (really don’t like saying that) is part of a bigger problem. But it also stands in the way of doing anything about the bigger problem, because jews have so thoroughly penetrated the leadership of the ‘left’ and therefore must be suspected of pursuing jewish rather than broad class goals.
        How it can be achieved, I can’t see easily, but there has to be some sort of emergency law, at least temporarily, removing jews from the offices of government and administration, and from all areas that would be involved in dealing with the situation and, and restricting their banking activities, while accurate info is gathered, and a plan evolved and implemented How? I realise this sounds as realistic as the Trotskyists call for a simultaneous world-wide workers’ revolution, but stating the problem is at least a start.

        Bobby Fischer said ( I only watched a couple of vids of his rants) that things were so far gone that only a military coup could deal with it; followed by the shooting out of hand of the top 100, 000 jews, and Nuremberg style laws. To be honest, I feel there’s something to be said for that, but only because of the Israel factor, particularly the existence of Mossad agents and ‘sanhedrin’ (?), those ‘committed to help’ in the general population. Who knows what they could do? They might have nukes in place in every US city. But not even this is an option, because as we can see in the spate of dismissals of any general who gets ‘ off message’, the army is firmly under control.

        I don’t have the solution. Just stating the problem, obvious though it is, is a big step forward in these times. The answer I feel is in broad civil society. We ‘the people’ have more power than we think. Look back to the power and high profile of the civil rights and anti-Vietnam-war movements. There were forces for change there that could have continued and grown; what happened to them? COINTELPRO was obviously a part of it, but also the ‘leadership’ just seemed to lose interest, just like the anti-war movement today. And who was/is the leadership?

        1. Look back to the power and high profile of the civil rights and anti-Vietnam-war movements. There were forces for change there that could have continued and grown; what happened to them? … who was/is the leadership?

          I don’t mean to be a downer or anything, but I think that Jews were prominent backers of both the civil rights movement and the anti-Vietnam-war movement in the United States. I haven’t done precise tallies of leadership for either, however.

        2. Yes but why did they back these movements? What is out of altruistic “social justice” motives?

          Probably some were doing it for altruistic reasons and some were doing it for the recognition and glory.

          What is your take on Jewish motivation for supporting the civil rights movement and opposing the Vietnam War?

        3. For the “civil rights movement”, probably using Negroes as the visible pawns through which they could break the old establishment order that had limited their success and rise to elite status. For instance, Ivy League quotas that existed at least into the 1960s. For Vietnam, they probably wanted US troops to all fight in the Middle East in 1967 and 1973 instead of in Southeast Asian rice paddies.

        4. ” … don’t mean to be a downer or anything, but I think that Jews were prominent backers of both the civil rights movement and the anti-Vietnam-war movement”

          Again, I thought it was obvious that that was what I meant, but it seems nothing can be obvious enough for you or Reality Check ( or maybe it’s that zionazi tactic we’re all familiar with from other blogs – feigned stupidity so as to misrepresent).

          You neatly edited out my point in your quote. I said part (not all) of the reason that these movements (and the current Stop the War) stood down was the leadership seemed to lose interest. By “and who was the leadership” of course I meant that the leadership was heavily jewish – I thought everyone knew that.

          It looks like the jewish leaders used these movements so far as they considered them useful to themselves, then dropped them, and left them leaderless. One way it was useful to the jews, most relevant to what we’re talking about, is that the Civil rights movement gave birth to a wide range of legislation, NGOs, legal firms etc, mostly run by jews, who could be used to prise open doors the WASPs had closed to the jews, but would head off any scrutiny of jewish racist practices.

    2. Lafayette and David
      Instituting quotas on jews would just backfire. It would reverse the trend of assimilation among young jews and radicalize them for generations to come. Jewish donors would stop giving to non jewish institutions and organizations and insted build their own and further develop jewish institutions. Why not wait for assimilation to take its course and diversify the establishment.

      “The Nuremberg Laws outlawed marriage and sexual intercourse between Jews and Germans,”

      Now THATS something I could live with. Jewish men would be forced to be more faithful to jewish women. Add in state funded, mandatory jewish day schools and we’re good to go. Skip the yellow stars though.

  9. I don’t mean to be a downer or anything, but I think that Jews were prominent backers of both the civil rights movement and the anti-Vietnam-war movement in the United States.

    Oh they were all right. And a lot of them are still active in those movements. That’s one of things I love about Jews. We on the Left owe such a debt to them.

  10. It looks like the jewish leaders used these movements so far as they considered them useful to themselves, then dropped them, and left them leaderless. One way it was useful to the jews, most relevant to what we’re talking about, is that the Civil rights movement gave birth to a wide range of legislation, NGOs, legal firms etc, mostly run by jews, who could be used to prise open doors the WASPs had closed to the jews, but would head off any scrutiny of jewish racist practices.

    I guess that’s a possibility, but I think a lot of the Jews in that movement were sincere people.

    There is an allegation that during the negotiations for the Civil Rights Act, the Jews tried to engage in some wording that would allow the Jews to continue to discriminate in employment the way they do. If so, that was pretty sleazy.

  11. I’m not well-verse in US anti-racist legislation, but if, as Robert said, if it’s the job of ‘ the US Civil Rights Commission’ , I’d take a bet that that body is almost exclusively jewish.

    I don’t think that’s true. I believe there are a lot of Black men in the EEOC. That’s the name. The EEOC has always gone after Whites disciminating against Blacks, and in some cases, males discriminating against females.

    They don’t deal with non-Whites discriminating against Whites, though it surely exists. And no one looks into Jews discriminating against non-Jews because supposedly it’s non-existent, as in, the media never talks about it. The few times they do, the Jews go screaming batshit fucking nuts crazy. There’s a thing called the Jewish advertiser boycott. You don’t want to write about this stuff too much.

  12. Jews dominate the new Forbes 400, so in the US at least there is no other group that matches them.
    There are still a fair few WASPy types in the top ten, from the Walton and Koch families. It would be interesting to see a graph of the different ethic, national and religious groups and the richest over the last century. Can someone with more time than me produce one?

    http://www.forbes.com/wealth/forbes-400#p_1_s_arank_-1_

    1. It baffles me that Mark Zuckerberg, the creator of Facebook, has a net worth of $6.1 billion. The current valuation of Facebook is around $33.7 billion. All for a site that is a monument to narcissism and time-wasting. I’m one of the few people I know who don’t have a Facebook account.

      It looks like the dotcom bubble never really ended. Bono’s investment group, Elevation Partners, bought a big chunk of Yelp earlier this year. Of course most of their investment decisions have been terrible.

      How long can the American economy continue when it consists mainly of stuff like this and FIRE?

      1. I don’t understand the Facebook phenomenon and why the hell you would wan’t to put your personal details and profile online.

        People were suprised that the FBI and CIA were using it to spy on people.

        No Shit off course they would do that the CIA/NSA probably helped create it like they did with Google (which records your IP address when you use there search engine) and Microsoft.

  13. Now I’m not saying that Jews rule the world. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. Jews today only make up 0.02% of the World’s population. That’s only about 700,000 people. But, to make this World a better place, I have a feeling we should at least look into what they’re doing such as; making a flying car, turning sea water into clean water, cleaner energy, ect. So for those there wondering what I’m ranting on about, Jews don’t rule the World. But I feel the World would be a better place if they did.

    1. “That’s only about 700,000 people”

      There are probably more than that in the New York Area alone.

      “But I feel the World would be a better place if they did.”

      Well, some people are just morons. The irony here is that jews rely on that fact. We can now see why they have been so successful at manipulating society.

  14. “turning sea water into clean water” ? ehmm… the problem with seawater isn’t that it’s dirty, but that it’s salty. Read up on it. Anyway, what about the nazis? They turned jews into soap – that’s an even better trick. Should THEY rule the world? Only joking. I know that story about the soap was just made up to demonise the Germans and distract from the genocide of Prussia and the Sudetenland.

  15. Well, I’ve read that even Yad Vashem have admitted that there’s no evidence of that, though I have’t got a link or ref. offhand, but I’m sure I’ve read it from normally fastidious sources so I believe it.

    1. Yes I don’t agree with Yad Vashem on that. There’s no pure 100% hard evidence, but we have photos, reports, samples of the soap, etc. Depends on what you want to believe. Yad Vashem has set up high standards for evidence.

      I had a bunch of photos of that, but they got deleted by my online photo storage site.

  16. “Yad Vashem has set up high standards for evidence. ” Well, I’ll say this for them: in all the decades they’ve been working at it, they’ve only come up with the names of 3 million jews (they claimed) died in Europe and Russia during WWII. So I’m happy to stick with the evidence on that and the soap business.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *