Against Mexifornia

In the comments section, tulio notes that he hates cholos. I don’t even know what a cholo is, so I had to look it up. In Andean Latin America, it means something like “dirty Indian.” Here in the California, it means Latino gangbanger. Tulio:

I hate cholos with a passion, so anything that got him on his ass is an accomplishment to me.

Pretty much all the Hispanics around where I live are cholos these days. Even the older ones are basically ex-cholos, and they hang out with the young idiots and talk and act all gang-like  with them. The only ones that aren’t cholos are the newly arrived illegals from Mexico who work in the fields. This Hispanic-American gang culture seriously sucks. It’s crap! It’s not as bad as ghetto Black culture, but it’s headed in the same direction.

Incidentally, I blame the Mexicans way more than the Blacks for this gang crap. Sure, there are Black gangs, Bloods and Crips, but how important are they? Here in California, who is really, really responsible for this gang culture more than anybody else? The Mexicans! They created it, the Blacks amplified and played off it, and the even the Whites are into it. Now the SE Asians, Samoans and Filipinos are doing it too. It sucks whoever does it, but who started it more than anyone else? The Mexicans!

Around my neighborhood, most everyone, Blacks, Whites, Hispanics, more or less assimilates to this semi-cholo culture. Even the Blacks in a sense. The Hispanics sent the culture down, and they dragged everyone else with it.

About ghetto Blacks, Black culture anymore is pretty much shit in the US, but I must say, as a hipster, hippie and doper, that Blacks added a lot to our culture.

Not just the rock music. I’m a rocker; where am I without Blacks?

But the culture of hip – from jazz to be-bop to rhythm and blues to hipsters to Beats all the way to hippies – and the youth counterculture scene was heavily infused with Black. Most of those hippie and Beatnik words came from Blacks.

Let’s add the comedians too.

So Blacks are mixed bag in the US.

The Mexicans? I can’t see much good about them anymore. Up til the 1970’s and early 1980’s, they assimilated to White, which was a good idea, since their own culture sucks.

Even old East LA barrio culture was sort of OK. The older people were all right – the older Mexican guy with a family, his dutiful and proper Mexican wife. The Mexican guy was working class, worked his whole life, raised a family; they had a little yapping Chihuahua in the window and a Mexican rock and cactus garden in the front yard. These people actually had some good, Old World Mexico type values. They were honorable in a traditional, almost peasant sort of way.

The new thing is crap. Crap! The older Hispanics now assimilate to the lowest of working class White/White trash/biker type culture. Lately they’re heavily into meth just like the lowest working class/White trash Whites. They’re not horrible, but they’re not good.

Even the women are covered with tatoos. Everyone is fat. Dope is everywhere. You would be surprised who is surreptitiously selling her ass. People are in and out of jail and living on the streets or in cars. Clothes are torn, stained and dirty. There is terrible domestic abuse. Everyone is hustling, and even the old Hispanic work ethic is dying in favor of leechism. Diet is awful and trashy. And intellect and culture is lowbrow with a capital L.

On top of all that, the illegal Hispanics stole our jobs.

Have the Hispanics brought us anything good anymore?

I will say good food, as a native Californian. That’s about it; I won’t grant them anything else.

Here in California, as far as who has done more damage, the Blacks don’t even count.

It’s Hispanics by a landslide.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

145 thoughts on “Against Mexifornia”

  1. “On top of all that the illegal Hispanics stole most of our jobs.” Are you sure about this Rob? I am certainly opposed to more immigration from Mexico on down into the U.S., but I was under the impression that Mexicans do work that Americans have long gave up on as too dangerous and backbreaking, such as veggie picking.

    1. True, only they will work in ag, but they have now taken over other entire industries too such as construction, roofing, drywall, carpentry, landscaping, janitorial, housekeeping, dishwashing, small truck trucking, trash pickup, gardening, etc.

      They have made serious inroads in the restaurant, hotel and welding industries. There have taken over the meatpacking, seafood prep and garment industries. Many are working in factories. There are also green card Hispanics making major inroads in long haul trucking with Mexican registered trucks. It really, really sucks!

      Basically, they are everywhere.

    2. They do the jobs Americans will not do at those wages. I guarantee that if offer a higher wage and reduce welfare benefits, then plenty of Americans will come out of the woodwork to take those jobs.

  2. “You would be surprised who is surreptitiously selling her ass.”

    That line made me burst out laughing!

    Okay, this was the most politically incorrect post ever. I have left-wing Latin American friends with degrees in Latin American studies. They would disown me for even READING this post. But I have to admit, it was interesting. People all think this shit anyway, it’s good to see it discussed and aired in a non-violent way. People need a benign pressure valve to blow off some steam. It keeps us sane.

    One good thing they brought here is the girls. God damn, Latin women can be beautiful. Sure there’s a lot of fatties and uglies in their group too, but when mestizas take care of themselves, they are some of the most gorgeous women on the planet. I also like salsa music and many other types of Latin music. And man, how can you not acknowledge the food! Mexican food is the 8th wonder of the world. I could eat that stuff every day for the rest of my life. I’m serious.

    Also, be careful about referring to Hispanics in general. We’re talking about Mexicans here in California. I’ve never met a Colombian or Chilean cholo. It’s mostly a Mexico and El Salvador thing.

    1. Also, be careful about referring to Hispanics in general. We’re talking about Mexicans here in California.

      Good point. The large of majority of my Hispanic friends were/are non-Mexican.

      Non-Mexican Hispanics get PISSED if you classify them as Mexican.

      They regard Mexicans/Mexican Spanish as low class. Their attitude is, “Spanish is such a beautiful language and Hispanics are a classy people, but stupid Mexicans make us look bad.”

      1. @BAG…those non-Mexican Hispanics you’re talking about are comparing themselves to recent Mexican immigrants who happen to be indigenous (and might not even speak Spanish very well). Of course they are going to feel offended! It’s like confusing White Mexicans tourists in the U.S. for another Hispanic group, say Puerto Ricans or Cubans. Then, they affirm that they are not Puerto Rican or Cuban because when they hear Puerto Rican or Cuban, they automatically think poor blacks/mulattos from the Caribbean whose incredibly annoying Reggaeton music has already corrupted their poor indigenous population back home. I certainly get pissed off when people think I’m a non-Mexican Hispanic. Why? Because I’m Mexican and people need to come to terms with the fact that there are many different kinds of Mexicans. I’ve seen many shocked non-Hispanic Mexicans when they meet me for the first time. Other Mexicans here in Texas have share similar stories with me.

        1. Ooops…the sentence before the last should read: I’ve seen many shocked non-Mexican Hispanic when they meet me for the first time.

    2. Tulio,

      I agree about the girls as it relates to South Americans or Caribbean women, but Mexican and Salvadoran women tend to be fat and ugly. Moreover, the South Americans and Caribbeans also have better food and do not seem to display any of these annoying mexi X3 / X8 (sureno / norteno) gangbanger tendencies.

      I know that is racist, and I could be biased because I grew up in South America, but it really seems to be true.

      1. Yeah, while some Hispanic women are attractive, a lot of them (mainly Mexicans) are also fat and have that obnoxious Latina sass.

        Personally, I think that Mexicans in Mexico are better than Mexican Americans. Now, if only they would stay there.

        1. I found women in Mexico to be infinitely more pleasant in all respects than their US-residing counterparts.

          Well, that’s the conundrum as described by Lawrence Auster (who, in spite of his anal Zionist views, did write an excellent critique of 3rd world immigration)

          If Hispanics keep their cultural values and don’t assimilate, then they’re separate from the mainstream and are of little helpfulness to the rest of us.

          But if they do assimilate into mainstream culture (which also includes ghetto black culture), then they become typical pathological Americans, which doesn’t help us either, since the anchor babies of these immigrants just increase the poor, uneducated, and pathological population.

          Either way, immigration is a problem.

      2. Mexican women aren’t the hottest latinas, that would be a toss-up between Colombian and Brazilian women. But Mexican women when they take care of themselves can be pretty damn beautiful. Particularly the mestizas. I’m not too into the more indigenous looking ones. The white Mexican chics are hotter than the white chics here.

        Look at this photo gallery of a club in the city of Monterrey. Monterrey I think is the whitest city in Mexico, most the girls are either white or light mestizas. God damn are they hot!

        http://www.bar-rio.com/index3.php?option=com_expose&Itemid=21

        1. Yeah, I agree that white Hispanic women on average are hotter than white American women. That may have to do with the fact that since they’re the wealthy elites in Latin American countries with the money for make-up and other beauty products, they look better. Also, the hot women on those Latin American TV programs are white women, so that probably inflates their overall beauty.

          Yeah, I’m not too big on full-blooded Indian women either.

          The good Latin American women are either white or Mestiza (although many of the Mestizas are fat).

        2. Yes, I’ve been to Monterrey and must agree. In fact, Mexican women from nearly all of northeast Mexico tend to be hot. But in California, most of the Mexicans and Central American women are ugly, in my opinion.

        3. “Mexican women aren’t the hottest latinas, that would be a toss-up between Colombian and Brazilian women” I am surprised a Black person don’t like much Mongoloid features, for example the nose of Mongoloids and Negroids is pretty similar, but anyways Colombians and Brazilians are mostly Caucasian, the Mexicans are like the Peruvians , mostly Native, apart from the looks department, we in Latin America are a bit angry with Mexicans, because Mexicans are bad at the industry of entertaintment, their TV shows have been COPIES of Tv series from Colombia or Argentina or Venezuela, etc ; Chinese are pretty copycats of White technology, but Mexicans are copycats of Caucasian Latin entertainment, and is annoying how they want to export their copycat versión and make it more popular than the original, seriously ,what talent have the Mexicans!? ,here is a video with an example of COPYCAT MEXICAN CULTURE …PATITO FEO is the original from ARGENTINE, and Mexicans not only want to steal plots from Whites, in the Mexican versión they choose whites mostly for the cast! there is a minority of Whites in Mexico, but c’mon! ,they want the White plot more White faces! if United States becomes full of Mexicans, people without talent, United States will fail, is it supposed that Brown Mexicans will be the majority of United States in 2046.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qCXAcKJ7Jw

        4. @Killua Zoldyck…”We in Latin America are a bit angry with Mexicans, because Mexicans are bad at the industry of entertaintment”…Really? If Mexicans are so bad at the industry of entertainment why do you South Americans keep watching and listening to Mexican-produced entertainment? It’s you people that are ridiculously crazy over el Chavo del Ocho. It’s you people that listen to our Mariachi music. It’s you people who keep importing our Tequila. It’s you people who keep coming to Mexico for a better opportunity in the entertainment industry because Televisa and TV Azteca pay much more $$$ than any of your mediocre media conglomerates would ever pay to your actors and models. And, if I’m not mistaken, Mexico was a pioneer in the Telenovela genre. Mexico was already producing soaps in the 60’s for its massive economically prosperous middle class while your country, whichever it is, only had transistor radios that, sadly enough, could only be afforded by your so called elite class. In other words, YOU PEOPLE COPIED THE TELENOVELA GENRE FROM US, NOT THE OTHER AROUND…As for the comment that “The Mexicans are like the Peruvians , mostly Native”….this only serves to expose your own inferiority complex because it makes you feel better, whiter…to over inflate the numbers of the Mexican indigenous population. It’s kind of like the closeted gay guy who loathes his own homosexuality and will therefore accuse somebody else of being homosexual simply to divert and hide the fact that he himself is homosexual.

        5. @Robert Lindsay…I doubt he is Mexican. The “we in Latin America” comment pretty much reveals his non-Mexican identity because many people in the region don’t even consider us Latin American. I used to date a Venezuelan girl in Dallas who told me that we Mexicans “were kinda sorta Latin American but not really”. Needless to say, his comments concerning the supposed predominance of Euro genes in Colombians and Brazilians is not one a true White Mexican would ever make. A true White Mexican would concede that Brazil has considerably more Euro admixture in its population given their large European immigration a century ago, but he or she wouldn’t throw in Colombia in the same category as Brazil. I have a feeling Killua might have said he “lives in Mexico”, and therefore, you might have interpreted it as him being Mexican. In last 20 years or so there’s been quite a substantial South American immigration to Mexico, so I’m guessing he is from a South American country and he happens to be living in Mexico City or some other city in Central or Southern Mexico where Indo-Mestizos are the majority.

    1. Tulio, I can’t believe these are the only types of Mexicans in California. We got them in Texas too, but they’re certainly a minority among us. Are they really that numerous in CA? And, c’mon dude, why do you keep emphasizing these guys as representative of all Mexicans? It’s like me emphasizing thuggish Brazilian Blacks and Mulattos from the favelas as Brazilian, rather than what they really are…THUGS.

      1. Of course not, the cholos are a minority, though they are congregated in some places and have effectively made certain parts of Los Angeles no-go zones. I haven’t spent any time in Texas but from everything I hear, Mexicans in Texas are a nicer bunch than the ones in California. From what people have told me, they are better-looking, less gangs and less racist. I’ve only met a few Texicans and they were cool. The Mexicans in Mexico are cool too, nice people. But something about California has corrupted many of them. And a recently moved to California friend from Monterrey has told me the same about California Mexicans. In fact she was the one that planted the idea in my head.

        1. Well, at least you got a friend from Monterrey that can give you a little more insight as to how Mexicans are really like on both sides of the border all along the Rio Grande. That’s pretty cool.

  3. I was cracking up the whole time reading this. Hilarious writing! God, good stuff. Tulio’s right about the hotties. I got some Mexican food tonight and my waitress was literally leaning over me everytime she came over and I had to resist looking down her shirt for a while and finally gave up because she was just inviting it and seemed not to care. God, she was gorgeous and feminine and totally okay with it. There were a lot of fatties serving food too though, and I could tell that if she didn’t work at keeping it down, she could put on the pounds too. Amerindians, being natural endomorphs (at least on the high carb american diet), maybe need a lot of working but (could explain the amount of lust they have) to keep off the pounds, kind of like pac. islanders. The mix of white/Amerindian is divine.

    But yeah, Mexicans have really screwed CA. No liberals want to admit but it sucks. Tell them to go spend some time in Watsonville or Salinas and see what they think of life there. But, closing the border, O My, how cruel! putting up fences! how unnatural! no human is illegal! wah~ wah wah wah~!! And you see the litter in our parks, going out for a walk or to take a swim, and you see the six kids and mom raising them off coke and McDonalds, and the unsmogged cars and trucks, and the seven decrepit trucks and trash outside each house, and yet you won’t dare speak a word against them. “They’re just a group of people, like anyone else. Whites are mostly just a bunch of rednecks. Stupid white-trash, blah, blah, blah, trailerparks, ha ha ha ha ha, we’re so much better than white trash. Fuck whitey, ha hah ha ha ha.”

    Shit, I’m tired and wasted. I’m going to bed.

  4. Yeah well you know who endures most of this cultural shame?
    Mexican-Americans.
    The responsible, intelligent ones, that is. Those who, for various reasons, find it necessary to co-exist and interact with the Anglo community on a day-to-day basis.

    I suppose if I spent all my time hanging out with those prize specimens displayed in tulio’s jpg (and that is an excellent portrayal of Cholo v.2010, btw) I wouldn’t care, would I? All my social and identification needs would be met in that insular community of bangers.

    But I don’t. I have nothing in common with those people. Even though I live in this ghetto, I share none of its impulsive, blue collar, prole values or mentality.

    Statements like “pretty much all the Hispanics around here are cholos these days,” expressed with a blogger’s license to indulge in generalities for the sake of conveying an obvious point, obscure the fact that there are many Mexican-Americans who lead respectable (and productive) lives while avoiding trampling on mainstream culture’s precious rose garden.

      1. It does suck but at least I blend in.
        Sorta!

        Funny how the barrio inevitably becomes how you dress, speak and think. If you don’t march to the barrio drummer, you eventually will stand out just as much as if you had purple skin.

  5. People need a benign pressure valve to blow off some steam. It keeps us sane.

    Ain’t that the truth. My pendejo neighbor parks his piece of shit hoopty in the middle of his lawn at least once a week to wash and polish it. He then cranks up a stereo that probably cost more than the car to earsplitting levels. The paint is starting to fade and peel, but he polishes that fucker for hours like it’s a Rolls Royce. He struts around with his fat man titties flopping about, so we can all see his ugly tattoos and know that Jalisco is in the house. The music is often loud enough to shake our house, but he cares not a whit about the eardrums of his numerous brats running around.

    It makes me miss the white trash losers who used to live there, having knock-down drunken fights with the local butt-rock station blaring in the background. At least they were funny.

    1. It makes me miss the white trash losers who used to live there, having knock-down drunken fights with the local butt-rock station blaring in the background. At least they were funny.

      See, even pathological whites are more funny than they are dangerous! 🙂

      1. To be fair, I don’t think Senor Baboso is dangerous, just rude and dumb as dirt. He tries to impress people here with his tough guy act, but I think he’d get laughed out of a real Mexican hood.

    2. And yes, for those who feel the burning need to point out white school shooters and pedophiles, I KNOW that there are indeed dangerous and pathological whites out there.

      However, generally speaking, that’s not the case for whites.

      1. pedophiles

        Blacks commit acts of child molestation at higher rates than whites.

        In fact there are very, very, very few crimes types (possibly none) for which blacks are parity with whites in the United States.

        The only one I can think of offhand is serial killing, in which I think blacks commit approximately 15% of the cases (i.e. equal to their representation in the population). But serial killing is an extremely specific and fairly rare crime compared to most (similar school shootings).

        I think this merits a visit to the DOJ and FBI statistics website.

        1. Blacks commit acts of child molestation at higher rates than whites.

          Robert also claims this. I guess that shatters the whole “creepy white guy pedophile” myth.

          There are also many more black serial killers than previously believed. You say 15%, while Earl Ofari Hutchinson claims that 20% of serial killers are black men.

          This warrants a look at statistics. Also, keep in mind that Hispanics and Middle Easterners get lumped in as “white” whenever they commit a crime.

          (like that serial stabber who was described as a “white male,” even though he was an Israeli Arab)

        2. Serial killer just means someone who kills 3 or more people within a short time frame. That’s the literal definition of “serial killer”. When most people think “serial killer” they are thinking of some sicko like Richard “the nightstalker” Ramirez or a Jeffrey Dahmer type that eats his victims. The word is automatically associated with sick twisted people. But not all serial killers are sick, a gangbanger that dusts off 3 of his drug rivals within a month is considered a serial killer.

          Now when it comes to the grotesque, sicko types of serial killers like Jeffrey Dahmer, they do tend to be white male loners. And that’s sicko types are what comes to mind when you the words “serial killer” to someone. They don’t think about the gangster on a shooting spree against a rival gang.

        3. Now when it comes to the grotesque, sicko types of serial killers like Jeffrey Dahmer, they do tend to be white male loners.

          What about child murderer Wayne Williams and other psychotic black serial killers?

          The only reason why people ONLY think of white males is because of the lamestream media.

        4. There could be a few of the Hannibal type sicko killers that are black, but I think it’s mostly white guys doing the truly crazy stuff.

        5. but I think it’s mostly white guys doing the truly crazy stuff.

          Of course, blacks would claim that this is because whites are naturally perverted and sick.

          That’s the common line used by black comedians (ie. we may kill each other and get into fights, but we ain’t crazy like dem white folk).

          My response to that response would be that blacks simply aren’t psychologically complex to be serial killers.

        6. So Tulio, to the extent that this is true, why do you think that whites are the creepiest of serial killers?

          And no, don’t go all CRT, whites simply cannot handle losing “privilege” nonsense on me.

        7. I said nothing of a natural inclination. Clearly individuals who murder and eat entrails of other humans are outliers no matter what their race, and their behavior really speaks nothing to the average person of their race.

          Your excuse though is interesting. I guess it’s a point of white pride than “even our sicko killers are smarter than blacks.” Ok, you can have ’em. Job well done.

          I do think though that whites tend to be into weirder things. Like the really sick, far out pornography, is mostly white, at least in America. Japanese porn is on a whole new level. But stuff like eating feces for sexual pleasure, necrophilia, bestiality, you ain’t going to see blacks doing this shit! For many black girls even a blow job is considered kinky.

        8. And, no, I don’t consume such porn myself! But sometimes I can’t resist the temptation to watch those internet viral shock videos like 2 girls 1 cup. I seriously regretted watching that! Anyway, funny that’s it always whites in these videos.

        9. Either that, or we just don’t hear as much about black sickness.

          It’s also true that blacks love to poke fun at whites for being the primary purveyors of homosexuality and other forms of perversion.

          However, my theory is that homosexuality and other sexual behaviors deemed perverted are simply more repressed and hidden from the mainstream.

          So either blacks are not as psychologically complex as whites, or we’re simply not hearing about it.

        10. I mean, the interesting thing is that the black friend I have who is psychologically complex is into porn and other weird shit.

          I don’t know. I guess getting into gang fights in the hood or fuming about “aversive racism” narrows black peoples’ focus so much that they cannot spend much time becoming psychologically complex weirdos.

        11. What’s so psychologically complex about cannibalism and eating shit? There were naked tribesman running around that practiced cannibalism. I’m not seeing what’s all that complex about it. Seems pretty primitive to me.

        12. What I mean is that in order to engage in such behavior, one must be psychologically disturbed, which means they must have some level of psychological complexity.

          Although it is interesting, blacks account for 25% of mental illness cases even though they’re only 13% of the population.

          I guess black mental illness manifests itself in Epic Beard Man and Muni bus fight type incidents.

          I guess white mental illness is more shocking to behold.

        13. But you have to break down what type of mental illness. I mean here must be a million different types of mental illness. Blacks and whites may be clustered into different illnesses. Like I’m willing to bet more whites have aspergers and more blacks have manic depression.

        14. Maybe it does have something to do with IQ.

          For example, as you’ve pointed out Japanese porno is crazy. I’ve also heard stories from people traveling in Japan about this elderly Japanese man who was blasting porno in front of a kid on a public train.

          The Japanese have pretty high IQs and a pretty disciplined and clean society.

          Maybe this kind of craziness is the downside of intelligence and affluence.

          Although blacks in Africa are into some pretty crazy shit too, like eating/taking body parts of Albinos or raping young virgin girls because they think they will rid them of Aids.

        15. Hmm, I don’t have an answer on that. Maybe it would even make a good topic for Robert to start. Why is the far out batshit crazy porn most likely to be white and/or Japanese.

          It could be a culture of perversion. I don’t know. Because even things like swinger clubs and orgies, its mostly whites doing it. I mean why don’t you have groups of blacks starting their own swinger/wife swapping clubs. I’ve never heard of blacks throwing an orgy. And we probably have more sex overall than whites. I just know that amongst blacks, perversion is REALLY looked down upon. Even mild perversion. I remember Robert once posted that he went down on a couple black women and they were shocked that he was going to do that, like it was something weird about it.

          I knew one perverted white guy who openly spoke about their enjoyment of eating girls buttholes. He even posted it on facebook in public. If a black said that amongst other blacks, he’d basically be excommunicated, trust me. We don’t like talking about that kind of shit. To us, that’s sick stuff that white people do, not us. It’s sort of the reverse of what Robert was saying about how whites think, “we don’t behave like that, that’s how blacks act, we’re white, we don’t do that.” When it comes to sexual perversion, you have the reverse where blacks don’t behave like that because they associate it with whites.

        16. Maybe it’s because blacks are so busy having sex and getting into fights regularly that they get all the negative energy out of their system.

          I’ve noticed that black tend to be a very impulsive and at times simple-minded people.

          As a result, they don’t hesitate to let lose and release their negativity in public.

          Whites and Asians, on the other hand, are about conformity, looking good and public, and as a result they repress their primitive instincts.

          This builds up over time and eventually it’s unleashed. I think this is why whites and Asians, as opposed to blacks, are into this nasty shit.

          Might also be because they’re simply more intelligent and psychologically complex than blacks.

          Who knows?

        17. To add on, Jared Taylor frequently mentions a study that demonstrates black kids cannot delay gratification the way white kids can.

          I haven’t read the study, so I don’t know if it’s true.

          But if it is, then this might be another reason. Since blacks always go for gratification without hesitation, they don’t repress any urges, which means they don’t do something REALLY psychotic later on.

          Although the consequences of such an approach is that blacks have more promiscuous sex and get into more fights/kill each other more than other groups.

          1. Blacks always go for gratification without hesitation? They don’t repress any urges?

            You are so full of shit.

        18. This perversion culture is primarily a result of affluent, post-industrial, post-modern societies, essentially North America, Western Europe, and the Pacific Rim nations (not just Japan). On the other hand, Slavs, who are white, the real Aryans in fact, are culturally conservative and don’t like fags and other nonsense. And they are not low-IQ either. Jews also have long promoted these kinds of things through their media control. Hollywood in particular.

        19. This perversion culture is primarily a result of affluent, post-industrial, post-modern societies, essentially North America, Western Europe, and the Pacific Rim nations (not just Japan).

          I guess it’s just a downside of white and Asian affluence.

          And I guess since blacks are poorer and less educated, they aren’t as vulnerable to this perversion.

          What you said about Jews is interesting. The biggest porn star, Ron Jeremy, is Jewish. Of course, most Hollywood perversion is purveyed by Jews.

          I wonder what role they play in this?

        20. I think that women’s liberation/the sexual movements of the 60s might have played a role.

          An analysis of whether or not excessive liberalism is to blame would be interesting.

        21. You said blacks are ALWAYS impulsive. You can’t use the word “always” when referring to any group.

          I’m not familiar with this study so I can’t comment one way or the other. I think delaying gratification is a learned trait, not something inborn. It’s like saying patience is a genetic trait. Of course it isn’t. As babies we’re born 100% impulsive, we have zero patience, we scream and cry until our parents give us the pacifier or toy. We are taught by our parents over time to suppress our urge to cry and scream whenever we want something and to be patient. This isn’t something inborn at all.

          The homophobia thing I don’t know about. I think that’s explained by both religion(blacks are more religious than whites on average), and secondly, by a more machismo culture. In a feminized SWPL culture like Iceland, homosexuality is openly embraced. Which is why women admire gay guys generally, or at least they don’t mind being around them. In a place like the Arab world where it’s both machismo AND extremely religious, you have the same thing.

          As I think about it more, I believe you are overanalzying it with all this HBD stuff. The problem with HBD is that it’s often abused by its believers and they want to superimpose it as an explanation for anything they can’t explain. It’s like the religious people. Anytime they can’t explain something, “it must be god’s work!”

          I think it’s just this simple, in black culture(and I’m only talking black America, I have no idea about black Latin or black African), there are strong taboos about really kinky stuff and coming off as perverted. Black women are notorious for being “missionary only”and a black chic will probably punch you for even mentioning putting it in her ass. I’ve spoken to guys that like kinky stuff and they admit they can’t get black girls to do it. They just don’t want to, that’s crazy white people stuff. I used to know one black guy that said he just stopped dating black women because they weren’t sexually adventurous enough. He wanted to use black light bulbs and paint their bodies in florescent colors or something, and the black girl just thought it was stupid. One common gripe black women bring up about black men that go for white women is that they want white women because they will do all the freaky shit that black women refuse to do.

          Btw, I’m not convinced that whites are less promiscuous than blacks. Black men and white men both would love to be fucking beautiful women all day if they could. We are no different in that respect. I mean seriously, if someone was going to bring you a different Playboy bunny every night of the week to fuck, would you turn it down? I didn’t think so. Plus given the fact that more white babies are aborted than born shows that there’s clearly a lot of whites fucking too. They just aren’t having the babies.

          I hate saying stuff like this, but as a realist there’s no point in denying it. I think the difference here is that black women are easier to lay than white women. On average. I don’t have anything scientific to back that up, but I’m going on what guys in the PUA community say. We’re all promiscuous as guys. All guys, black, Latino, white are down to fuck a hot babe at any moment.What makes the difference though is the women. Some will spread their legs quicker than others. I’m guessing there are some differences amongst races when it comes to ease of the women. Though obviously not everyone fits the trend. I’ve seen black girls who don’t sleep around and seen Asian girls that are ho’s.

        22. YES! Jews are *heavily* involved in the business side of the porn industry. I know this as absolute fact.

          Is that really true? Hmm, explains a lot.

          And I don’t know about the whole abortion thing. I’ve heard that black women actually get more abortions.

          But I don’t know about black women being saintly in a sexual sense. My hunch tells me no.

        23. Anyway, I think this is all the more reason why whites need to embrace white nationalism.

          WN’s like James Edwards and The Political Cesspool don’t tolerate feminized men, homosexuality, or other perversions.

          The WN’s who do lose it are like Benjamin Smith, which doesn’t make them too different from Colin Ferguson types.

          You’ll never hear about a WN eating people or doing any of that other perverted shit. I think that’s because they strongly reject SWPL liberalism and post 60s perversion.

          If most white people were like WN’s, many of these pathologies within the white community would end.

        24. Blacks always go for gratification without hesitation? They don’t repress any urges?

          Compared to other groups, yes. At least compared to whites and Asians, I’ve noticed that blacks are far more impulsive.

        25. At least in my middle school, the kid who got expelled for sexually assaulting a white girl in the bathroom (and he also sexually harassed white girls in general) was an impulsive ghetto black kid.

        26. Alpha is right, BAG. You are getting a bit crazy into this WN way too fast. You really seem to be getting consumed by it and saying a lot of off the wall things as of late. This isn’t the same BAG that was here even 2 months ago. Your thoughts don’t seem as umm…thought out and your logic isn’t as well composed. I think you are becoming consumed by hate, honestly. And it’s messing with your head.

  6. The expert in how Mexes brought down U.S. wages is George Borjas. Review his work. Last I checked the most violent gang in the world was a Salvadoran gang. Talking per capita membership. This might have changed. Bob might want to elaborate. They might be more on the east coast.

    1. I think you’re talking about la mara salvatrucha (ms13). They were huge in LA a few years ago, but are pretty much dormant now. My understanding is that they are big in the DC area and in El Salvador, itself.

      Borjas is great – he’s a liberal too, by the way.

  7. 3 North American countries, 2 became industrialized and the other is a rotting 3rd world shithole, thanks to many Mezitos, now we’re turning into one. Mexicans are parasites who are slightly more evolved than blacks.

    1. There will be massive riots in every large US city if we ever tried to deport them.

      So what? We cannot let fear of their wrath prevent us from doing what is necessary. If they’re the types who will riot if we seek to enforce the law, then they’re not the types we want here anyway.

      3rd world immigration, is, quite frankly, bullshit. You cannot have a 1st world country with a 3rd world population. And the more we continue to import a poorly educated, impoverished population, the more we’ll look like a 3rd world country.

      1. Yeah, but in order for that to happen the federal government either has to get off its ass and do something OR more and more states will have to start defying the federal government.

        The second option slightly unnerves me, because as we all know, the last time that happened…

        Either way, we have to take the fight to the open borders crowd.

        1. Can you imagine the ADL lecturing Mexicans on jewish victimhood and suffering? The Mexicans will laugh their ass off.

          That’s what Jews need to realize. Their appeals to guilt and “critical theory” tricks have worked on us pathetic guilt-ridden white gentiles. Also, since Jews look white (albeit different from other whites), they can blend in with whites to a certain extent.

          But…

          With blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and other groups, the tricks of the ADL and other Jews will not work so easily on them. Also, since they cannot blend in with non-white groups the way they can with whites, other groups will SEE THROUGH THEM.

          Jews certainly do not fool Malcolm X, as evidenced by this one conversation he had with a Jew: “I told him all I held against the Jew was that so many Jews actually were hypocrites in their claim to be friends of the American black man, and it burned me up to be so often called ‘anti-Semitic’ when I spoke things I knew to be the absolute truth about Jews. I told him that, yes, I gave the Jew credit for being among all other whites the most active, and the most vocal, financier, ‘leader’ and ‘liberal’ in the Negro civil rights movement. But I said at the same time I knew that the Jew played these roles for a very careful strategic reason: the more prejudice in America could be focused upon the Negro, then the more the white Gentiles’ prejudice would keep diverted off the Jew. I said that to me, one proof that all the civil rights posturing of so many Jews wasn’t sincere was that so often in the North the quickest segregationists were Jews themselves. Look at practically everything the black man is trying to ‘integrate’ into for instance; if Jews are not the actual owners, or are not in controlling positions, then they have major stockholdings or they are otherwise in powerful leverage positions-and do they really sincerely exert these influences? No! And an even clearer proof for me of how Jews truly regard Negroes, I said, was what invariably happened wherever a Negro moved into any white residential neighborhood that was thickly Jewish. Who would always lead the whites’ exodus? The Jews! Generally in these situations, some whites stay put-you just notice who they are: they’re Irish Catholics, they’re Italians; they’re rarely ever any Jews. And, ironically, the Jews themselves often still have trouble being ‘accepted.’ Saying this, I know I’ll hear ‘anti-Semitic’ from every direction again. Oh, yes! But truth is truth.”

          (Autobiography of Malcolm X, pages 379-380)

          You see, Jews have a pretty good deal with us. We’re guilt-ridden, we’ve grown pathetic, and many of us kiss Jewish ass.

          They should have left us be and quit while they were ahead. But noooo…

          Well, once non-white take over and “diversify” this country, as they want, they can see if the tactics they’ve used against white gentiles will continue to work.

          My only advice to Jews is this: Be very, very careful what you wish for.

        2. Indeed – the future is bleak – not to mention the fact that Senators and representatives of both parties tend to have illegal immigrant Mexican women cleaning their houses and raising their children.

        3. BAG, that overlooks a deeper reality. Asians, Hispanics, etc., have done absolutely nothing to jews historically and so there is no reason why we would feel guilty.

        4. BAG, that overlooks a deeper reality. Asians, Hispanics, etc., have done absolutely nothing to jews historically and so there is no reason why we would feel guilty.

          Excellent point. That just further proves what I’m saying.

          Jews won’t have such an easy time in a majority non-white America. They had a good deal with us, but they want to undermine us.

          Well, I’m just telling them that they ought to be VERY CAREFUL WHAT THEY WISH FOR.

        5. Wow, I read the autobio of Malcolm X back in high school and I don’t even remember that passage. Quite interesting indeed. I’ve never been into the whole Jewish thing myself. Maybe I should inform myself on what people’s grievances with them are, if for no other reason than I can at least have an understanding of the arguments.

        6. Speaking of which, ethnic, non-Anglo whites also tend to me more critical of jews and immune from guilt. In the high school I attended, the Catholic Irish, Italians, Poles, Germans did NOT dig the jews. Also, eastern Europeans Slavs are not pussies on the jewish question. It’s always the pathetic Anglo-Saxon whites who love to kiss jewish ass.

        7. Speaking of which, ethnic, non-Anglo whites also tend to me more critical of jews and immune from guilt. In the high school I attended, the Catholic Irish, Italians, Poles, Germans did NOT dig the jews. Also, eastern Europeans Slavs are not pussies on the jewish question. It’s always the pathetic Anglo-Saxon whites who love to kiss jewish ass.

          That’s really interesting. Who knows?Perhaps me being mainly Greek accounts for me not being a pussy on the Jewish question.

          (although my Greek dad is a bit of a philo-semite and gets really agitated whenever I bring up Jewish influence)

          And it is true that Irishmen such as Edmund Connelly are not afraid to criticize Jews. I don’t know about Kevin MacDonald (I’ve read that MacDonald is more of a Scottish surname).

          It’s also true that Eastern Europeans such as Tomislav Sunic aren’t afraid to criticize Jews.

          Although the Political Cesspool Guys are Anglos and they don’t hold back when discussing Jews.

          But your point is well taken. Generally speaking, I like Slavs and Eastern Europeans, because they have a stronger sense of nationalism, pride, and don’t take non-white/Jewish crap.

          The only Eastern European I’m not too big on is Mira (Female Serbian commenter over at Abagond). She basically kisses black ass and agrees with virtually everything they say.

          Although I like to think that most Serbs don’t spend their time kissing anti-racist black American ass online.

        8. Is the Political Cesspool based in the South? Maybe that explains it somewhat. Also Midwestern whites, who are mostly German or British in descent, seem to be more Jew-wise as well. Many Southerners, on the other hand, have become retarded Christian Zionists like that fat piece of shit John Hagee who believes jews are God’s Chosen and we’re all damned if we don’t support Israhell.

        9. @ Tulio

          Maybe I should inform myself on what people’s grievances with them are, if for no other reason than I can at least have an understanding of the arguments.

          In a nutshell, it’s similar to what Malcolm X said. They’re hypocrites. They claim to support open borders, black causes, etc at home, but support the apartheid state of Israel above.

          Jews like to think of themselves as moral and altruistic people, but to the extent that they do help others, it’s only a way for them to camouflage their Jewish interests.

          Neocons and Cultural Marxists have also done a ton of damage to either our psyche, foreign policy, etc.

          But I’m not going to get into much detail here.

          @ FPY

          The Political Cesspool is indeed located in the South. Memphis, Tennessee, to be exact.

          I too absolutely abhor white Christian Zionists. Even more than the white anti-racists, I see them as the white equivalent of Uncle Tom’s.

          I mean, who’s worse? The Jewish neocons/Cultural Marxists, or the non-Jews who go along with them?

        10. While I hate Tim Wise and wish him the worst, white Christian Zionists are more of a threat because they have more power.

          They are the enablers of Israel and the Jewish agenda.

  8. Mexicans also screw things up by distorting crime statistics, since they’re lumped in with whites.

    Although I place greater blame on those idiot members of the federal government who refuse to count Mestizo Hispanics as a separate race.

    1. Many Mexicans are not even mestizo, but pure Amerindian. Speaking of which, I can imagine a scenario worse than Mexifornia. That would be the native-born Negro population of California growing exponentially instead of Mexicans. At least the Mexicans work hard, at least the non-gangbanger ones.

      1. dude, they work hard for exactly one generation. after that, they get on welfare just like their black neighbors. at least the black people are funny and have decent music.

        1. …and understand English. I got rear-ended by what I’m pretty sure were some illegals a couple years ago. The fuckers could barely speak a lick of English then tried to say I backed into them when I was stopped at the red light and got hit from behind. I quickly wrote down their license plate number. They hopped in the car and took off, never admitting guilt. I wanted to beat his ass, but I figured why bother. I just had my insurance company and the police handle it. Luckily they didn’t raise my premium.

  9. That would be the native-born Negro population of California growing exponentially instead of Mexicans.

    All I know is that if California were 40% black as opposed to 40% Hispanic, things would be MUCH WORSE.

    1. From a personal perspective, Koreans get along better with Mexicans than with Negros. In the Korean supermarkets that I go to, many of the workers are Mexican, and they get along fine with the Korean owners. They don’t have the “tude” common among blacks.

      1. They don’t have the “tude” common among blacks.

        True. While I’m not too thrilled about Hispanics taking over in terms of numbers and influence, from my own personal experience, I can say WITHOUT HESITATION that Hispanics are much more pleasant on both an individual and group level than blacks.

        Personally, I really don’t have an individual problem with Hispanics.

        Most don’t have the “tude,” and the ones that do tend to be the ghetto ones who dress and act black!

        I’ve also had/still have many Hispanic friends (well, definitely more than black friends, that’s for sure), so psychologically I’m inclined to view them in a more positive light than blacks.

        The negative experiences with Hispanics I’ve had tend to be with those ghetto black acting types. So I consider those Hispanics black by extension.

      2. United States should have more immigrants from Caucasian Latin countries like Colombia or Argentine, the Amerindians from Mexico or Guatemala don’t have talent, how United States will maintain their top position with those people? MEXICANS ARE COPYCATS, because they have less creativity, they steal ideas for Tv series from Colombia or Argentine, that shows us they lack of creativity in many things; Chinese in United States are well known copycats of technology, but in Latin America the Mexicans are well know copycats of Entertainment

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YPPWLxuIbk

    2. I don’t know about that. The black population of S. Carolina is 30%, I don’t think it’s any worse a place to live than California. It’s nearly that high in Georgia too. Once again, I don’t think the quality of life in either of those places is bad. At least I don’t hear about anyone fleeing from them.

  10. You’re on a roll with these great posts Robtert – classic.

    I was just telling my friend a similar story recently concerning black gangstas vs mexi gangbangers. That is, the black gangstas, as obnoxious as they may be, tend to have a cool style and ironic sense of humor about them. Whereas the mexis still wear dickies and rock the bald heads with the ridiculous pancho villa style mustache. Also, black women are way sexier, in my opinion. I could go on, but I’d largely be repeating what you said.

    Moreover, Jim Crow was fucked up and didn’t happen so long ago. LA County had de facto housing segregation through the 1960s. So, while I admit black ghetto culture annoys the shit out of me, I tend to tolerate it a bit more than this California cholo culture.

  11. Now when it comes to the grotesque, sicko types of serial killers like Jeffrey Dahmer, they do tend to be white male loners. And that’s sicko types are what comes to mind when you the words “serial killer” to someone. They don’t think about the gangster on a shooting spree against a rival gang.

    No, most Black serial killers are the sicko types. Maybe not as sick as Dahmer, but you get the picture. Blacks commit serial killing at ~2X their rate in the population. I don’t know how to do the math for how much more likely they are to be serial killers. Whites are ~53% of the serial killers, something like that.

    There’s no evidence to the “Whites are more likely to be the creepy kind.” It’s simply myth.

    1. I think that’s one of the way blacks feel good about themselves.

      “Yeah, we may kill each other, get into fights, and have kids out of wedlock, but we at least don’t do none of that sick ass, crazy ass white folk shit.”

      I beg to differ. I mean, as Huey Freeman once said: Niggers are crazy.

      Of course, he had this whole black peoples versus niggers dichotomy like Chris Rock, which meant he distinguishes between the two.

      But I would say that these black serial killer types fall under the nigger category. And we all know they’re crazy.

    2. What is your evidence that most black serial killers(those that have killed 3 or more in a short time) are of the sicko variety?

      Funny, just did a google search for the worse serial killers and all the sites I see, like this one below are showing almost all white men. Richard Ramirez is the only exception. Of course you guys will probably say the media is being anti-white and ignoring blacks who do crazy sicko crimes, but I seriously doubt that.

      http://hubpages.com/hub/Famous-Serial-Killers

      1. I did some research on that crap a while back. I found a whole page about Black serial killers. None of them were some gang guy who killed 3 separate rivals over a few months. They were all the sicko types.

        But I will say that they don’t tend to fuck dead bodies and eat them. They eat dead bodies in Africa, but not in the US.

        I really tired of this, “Whites are more likely to be serial killers” lie. It’s basically an anti-White racist lie.

  12. but I think it’s mostly white guys doing the truly crazy stuff.

    What do you mean by truly crazy stuff? Black serial killers invade homes, kill and leave. They don’t abduct so much, take them to their homes, then dispose of bodies in weird ways. I’m also not aware of them eating bodies or having sex with them, though that one Black guy around Ohio recently had all sorts of dead bodies in his house.

    Depends what you mean by sick I guess.

    1. I think it’s interesting that the report rate doesn’t follow that because Blacks certainly aren’t averse to sicko stuff in Africa or across the Caribbean.

      Cannibalism, weird fetishes, child rape and murder. Tons of doing weird (often sexual) stuff to dead bodies.

      So I’d be pretty skeptical that Black Americans are deterministically incapable of this stuff, on a genetic level. Unless there’s some weird reason that Black cultures in the US are selected against it. Either it’s a cultural thing or it happens and its just not reported or publicized (I think the second is more likely, given the general disarray of the American Black community).

  13. Anyway, funny that’s it always whites in these videos. I saw a shit-eating video by the 2 girls 1 cup folks called 8 girls 1 cup or something. There were Black girls in there. There was only one eating it though, and I think she was White.

  14. Getting back to the topic at hand, although it’s not much of a choice, I would much prefer a Mexican dominated California than a black one. And that goes for any state where they are numerically close.

    1. I would much prefer a Mexican dominated California than a black one. And that goes for any state where they are numerically close.

      Agreed.

      If you want any idea of what a black run place looks like, look no farther than Detroit, Memphis, Zimbabwe, etc.

      1. What? You didn’t you throw Haiti in there too. I lived in Atlanta, it’s a “black run place” and it seemed like a decent place to live to me. I wouldn’t have any hestitation about living there. Why choose Zimbabwe? Why didn’t you choose Botswana which is stable? Why didn’t you choose Barbados? Why do you pick the worse hell holes you can find and then say they represent all black people?

        Maybe we can pick Moscow, Sicily and Albania or other mob infested cities in E. and S. Europe as an archetype of whites?

        1. Did you see what I wrote about that Black group in the Sahel recently? They are Muslims, they number around 1 million, and their homicide rate is as low as Japan’s. Weird. So, on a societal level, high Black crime is not inevitable, and strong Black impulse control is possible, though not typically happening. Low crime rates seem to exist across the Black and Muslim Sahel for some reason. Also, Blacks in the Arab World are very well-controlled. I talked to the Yemenis who run the local market, and they told me that the Blacks in Yemen are very well-behaved and cause almost no problems.

          And supposedly in Communist Mozambique under Samora Machel, you could walk from one end of Maputo to the other in the middle of the night and no one would bother you. An all-Black city. Crazy.

          Cuba is probably the safest country and Havana the safest big city in Latin America and it’s full of Blacks.

          The homicide rate among US Blacks is 15 times the homicide rate of all-Black Dominica.

    2. Why don’t you go live in Korea, Mr. Korean nationalist and then you don’t have to worry about either blacks or Mexicans? Why are you living in the USA anyhow?

        1. You are an Asian nationalist, and you brag about how Koreans wouldn’t put up with blacks, and since there are no blacks in Korea, wouldn’t that be the perfect place for you to live? Why would ANY Asian nationalist be living in a non-Asian country? I’ve never met a white nationalist that wants to live in Korea or China.

        2. There are blacks in Korea, unfortunately.
          US Army.

          10 or 20 thousand blacks living on isolated army bases? Compared to 47 million ethnic Koreans in the country at large?*

          Sounds a hell of a lot better than the 15% black United States (at least for an Asian ethnic nationalist).

          *Plus, if you don’t mind moving to the North rather than South, DPRK probably has like less than 1000 non-Asians in the entire country, and less than 10 blacks (if any).

        3. I’ve never met a white nationalist that wants to live in Korea or China.

          Have you ever met ANY white nationalist in real life, I mean besides online?

  15. It’s also true that blacks love to poke fun at whites for being the primary purveyors of homosexuality and other forms of perversion.

    No way, there is TONS of homosexuality in the Black community, much of it on the down low. I used to hang out in Hollywood all the time, which is swarming with gays. Out Black gays were everywhere. I was stunned at how many there were and I even started entertaining theories about why there was so much homosexuality in the Black community. I didn’t have any figures to back it up though. It was just observational.

    1. http://inductivist.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html

      ” I told him that the prevalence of homosexuals is at least as high among blacks and Hispanics. According to the General Social Survey, it’s 3.0% of white men, 5.4% of Hispanics, and 3.8% of blacks.”

      “According to The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, 7.0% of white adolescent boys say that they have been romantically attracted to another boy. The corresponding number for blacks is 8.2% and 9.0% for Hispanics (N = 3,101).”

      Not sure if it’s statistically significant but it seems like there are slightly more gay guys amongst Black and Hispanic people (I’m surprised by the young men study to be honest). It’s a pretty small degree. Might just be because they’re more urban (but presumably they’re also more religious which has the opposite tendancy, so I’d figure that’s a wash). I think a guy named Steve Hsu also estimated from HIV prevalance, comparing with Whites (where there is no particular tendancy to be more or less infectable) that there were the same or fewer gays amongst Asians, though I can’t find a link to that.

      Black people always seemed to have the “gayest” culture to me – hedonism, promiscuity, love of dressing up, music and acting, strong interest in the male physique, lots of bitchy trash talking rather than masculine white man “straight talking” and “strong, silent type”. Though on the other hand, not much in the way of avoiding conflict, being empathic, bookish, sensitive and irreligious (though I’m not sure if these are just stereotypes of gay men, rather than the reality). Flamboyent gay guys versus straight nerds always seems to characterise the African to Asian continuum better than Alphas vs Betas (even though it’s still not very good). Might have more gays because the culture is more “gay”, so people are more likely to respect their strengths and they can consequently be more open about who they are (though on the other hand, more religious, so…).

  16. Although it is interesting, blacks account for 25% of mental illness cases even though they’re only 13% of the population.

    I guess black mental illness manifests itself in Epic Beard Man and Muni bus fight type incidents.

    I guess white mental illness is more shocking to behold.

    Not at all. Black mental illness is way more shocking and disturbing. In particular, Blacks have an elevated rate of schizophrenia. I’ve already known two Black male schizophrenics. You don’t get more nuts than schizophrenia. They also have a lot of manic-depression, in particular the manic stuff. Rate of depression seems low. Rate of anxiety disorders like OCD and stuff like that is quite low. Africa is similar.

    Blacks are into the more outward and expressive illnesses and not into the more introverted and inhibited ones.

    1. Blacks are into the more outward and expressive illnesses and not into the more introverted and inhibited ones.

      Yeah, that’s probably it.

  17. I’ve noticed that black tend to be a very impulsive and at times simple-minded people.

    The better word than simple-minded is *child-like.* Not childish. Childlike. If you spend a lot of time around Blacks, especially low class types, you start thinking there is something to it.

    Childlike means acting like a child. Not good or bad, just like a kid. Childish means acting like a child in the bad way. Child-like is not necessarily bad, but it’s not such a complex way to emote really.

  18. I’ve noticed that black tend to be a very impulsive and at times simple-minded people.

    The better word than simple-minded is *child-like.* Not childish. Childlike. If you spend a lot of time around Blacks, especially low class types, you start thinking there is something to it.

    Childlike means acting like a child. Not good or bad, just like a kid. Childish means acting like a child in the bad way. Child-like is not necessarily bad, but it’s not such a complex way to emote really.

    People have been saying that about Blacks forever. Even Thomas Jefferson used those words in describing them.

    1. You should check out – Dusk in Autumn’s post about “Are modernized people more feminized or more infantilized?” http://akinokure.blogspot.com/. He actually writes a lot of stuff that I think you might be interested in (for an ex-GNXPer) and has a good attitude to Black Americans and so on.

      For example:

      “Young people, whether children or adolescents, are much more violent and destructive of property than adults”

      “Emotional sensitivity and empathy (even including non-human animals). Young people are more callous about these things than mature adults are, whereas females are more adept than males.”

      Adolescent might make sense than childlike I think. The way I tend to think of it is that Africans are like adolescents, while Asians are both like the middle aged and like small children, while other peoples tend to be more intermediate (so a bit more like prepubescents and mature young adults). To the extent that age based analogies make sense (which is only a very little bit).

  19. To add on, Jared Taylor frequently mentions a study that demonstrates black kids cannot delay gratification the way white kids can.

    I haven’t read the study, so I don’t know if it’s true.

    This study was done in the Caribbean and has been repeated over and over, almost endlessly, with the same results every time. Blacks, when asked to take a candy bar now or wait a week for a much bigger candy bar, always take the smaller bar now. Whites wait a week for the big one. Study is done on little kids.

    Bottom line is Blacks are more impulsive and less able to delay gratification. There is a ton of real world evidence out there in everything from crime to savings rates to indicate that the theory is good.

    Then you have Blacks like Alpha Unit who are less impulsive than most Whites, I think.

    1. I can understand why Alpha, a respectful and classy black woman gets upset when I make disparaging remarks about blacks.

      (ie. They’re impulsive, they have the “tude,” they cannot delay gratification, etc)

      But my experience attending middle school in/walking through Oakland has taught me that, sadly, most blacks are not like Alpha.

      If they were, I wouldn’t have such a problem with them.

      Alpha, you can either interpret that as a personal compliment to you, or an attack on your race. It’s a little bit of both.

    2. That’s a dumb experiment.

      I’d take the fucking candy bar now. Not out of impulsiveness but because I know a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

      Also, it could have to be with coming from a culture where you are poorer and you don’t know what you’re going to have a week from now. If someone gives you something now, take it, because you don’t know if they’ll show up later to give what they promised. I’m just saying there are other things that could possibly explain the result.

      1. It’s not a dumb experiment at all. The Blacks take it now; the Whites wait a week. Over and over and over and over. These are little kids too, not much cultural influence yet and under heavy genetic influence.

        I would hope that they would have controlled for poverty and whatnot.

        Considering that we have a ton of real world evidence that Blacks on average have a harder time delaying gratification than Whites do, the experiment looks good.

        I think this might be down to introversion vs. extroversion.

        Introverts delay gratification. Extroverts? LOL, yeah right. Even White extroverts have serious problems with this, throughout life. I know, I grew up with a bunch of them.

  20. Btw, I’m not convinced that whites are less promiscuous than blacks.

    No, Blacks are more promiscuous than Whites, males and females both. In the US, and I think in the Caribbean and Africa too. There’s a suggestion that both genders of Blacks have a higher sex drive than Whites. Check out Philippe Rushton.

    1. Check out Philippe Rushton.

      Um…

      Even as a white nationalist, I’m not too big on Philippe Rushton. I think he’s an academic fraud and loon. I mean, who seriously comes up with juvenile theories that there’s a connection between dick size and intelligence, and then pays students of different races to jack off?

      You might want to cite someone better than Rushton. Just a friendly piece of advice.

      I know that I’m using a bit of an ad hominem here, but so far I’m not a fan of Rushton.

      Although I’m sure there’s other evidence outside of Rushton to prove your point.

  21. Damn, got Alpha to curse! Must have really pissed her off even more than usual!

    Oh she curses all right. Just not in the comments section here. She’s into propriety. Time and place and all that.

    1. If you watch his interviews. He’s pretty damn ghetto. You said you don’t like the whole ghetto thing. He admits to having pimped and dealt drugs. So why do you love the guy so much? You hate blacks when they do things like this, but a white that guy that acts ghetto is your hero.

      1. Yes, I’m aware that he was into pimping and drugs back in the day.

        But no, he doesn’t sound ghetto. Sure, he says “ain’t” and stuff like that, but he sounds NOTHING like your ebonics spewing black kid.

        Besides, I don’t like him for his supposed ghettoness of pimp pass.

        That ass kicking alone gets him points in my book.

        1. And yes, I know you’ll point out that I’m just seeing what I want to see, this is another example of horrific white privilege, I’m blind to my aversive racism (although you should know by now that there’s nothing “aversive” about it), etc.

          Look, to clarify, I’m not endorsing this guy as an overall human being. He’s nuts, I admit it.

          However, as someone who’s been frequently threatened and intimidated by rowdy and aggressive black kids growing up, watching him whup mr. ebonics’ ass was quite satisfying.

          My endorsement of EBM starts and ends with the bus fight.

  22. Alpha is right, BAG. You are getting a bit crazy into this WN way too fast. You really seem to be getting consumed by it and saying a lot of off the wall things as of late. This isn’t the same BAG that was here even 2 months ago. Your thoughts don’t seem as umm…thought out and your logic isn’t as well composed. I think you are becoming consumed by hate, honestly. And it’s messing with your head.

    Agreed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *