New commenter LaFleur, a great combination of a Leftist working class person who has had it with anti-White crap, Cultural Marxism and illegal immigration, had everyone fooled.
I was worst of all. I was sure she was a man. I still almost can’t believe it’s a woman, though I think I should, since she just said she is. She does have a masculine writing and even thinking style, which is good, since I’m a chauvinist. I think there is a male genius and a female genius. LaFleur tends to show more of the male genius in her interesting mind. The classical female genius is like a couple of women who are hosts on the radio show I listen to. One is named Caroline Casey. I forget the other one. They both sort of wander about as they talk, but their brilliant. As they wander, there is a lot of talk about emotions, a lot of tangential stuff. It’s awesome, it’s genius, but it’s not male style. Male style is boom boom boom point 1 point 2 point 3 conclusion. Onto the next! It’s much more logical in a scientific or Socratic kind of way, not as tangential. I’m not really sure one is better than the other. They’re just different.
I also think there is a Black genius. You see it in Michael Eric Dyson and especially in Cornel West. It’s almost like intellectual rapping. Cornel West is an utter flat out genius, but it’s not a White way of thinking. It jumps around a lot too, like a jazz solo or a great rapper, and it can be sort of sloppy, but it’s also sort of male in its logic and power. Bam bam bam bam ba-boom!
The female genius kind of wanders around like this great river spreading out into this 100 mile, no round estuary where you can’t even find your way. It’s brilliant, but it meanders about in a jaunty or even loopy way.
Just some of my piggy and race realist feelings.