Jewish Power in the US in the Clear Light of Reason

An anti-Semitic commenter writes:

As a leftist, you yourself should have plenty of reasons not to like the “Chosen”. For one thing, who’s responsible for the current financial catastrophe and looting of workers: Ben Shalom Bernanke, Lloyd Blankfein, Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin etc. Who’s responsible for pushing for a catastrophic war on Iran: AIPAC, Israel itself, various Jew neocons. Who’s trying to pass laws that would destroy freedom of speech and criminalize all criticisms of Jews and Israhell: ADL, various other Jew organizations.

This requires some analysis. The first part is simply absurd:

For one thing, who’s responsible for the current financial catastrophe and looting of workers: Ben Shalom Bernanke, Lloyd Blankfein, Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin etc.

This Socialism of Fools stuff is so lame. It’s not even analysis. It’s ridiculous. It lacks a proper class analysis.

Who’s responsible for pushing for a catastrophic war on Iran: AIPAC, Israel itself, various Jew neocons.

This is true, but also US imperialism wants to attack Iran too. And the US Sunni fascist buddies in the Arab World, especially the Saudis. The Saudis probably hate Iran more than the Jews do.

Who’s trying to pass laws that would destroy freedom of speech and criminalize all criticisms of Jews and Israhell: ADL, various other Jew organizations.

This much is correct, but it won’t go anywhere.

Also, you need to realize that there are 10’s of millions of US Gentiles who are 100% behind the Jews and the Israelis. Not because they have been forced to be, but because they really like them and they have formed an alliance with them voluntarily.

For instance, the US military and US imperialism has a deep alliance going with the Israelis dating back 25 years or so. It’s almost impossible to disentangle them now. It’s like Israel is almost an arm of the Pentagon or the Pentagon has an office in Tel Aviv. They’re like the same thing.

People need to get away from this “Jews whispering in the King’s ear” trope.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

48 thoughts on “Jewish Power in the US in the Clear Light of Reason”

    1. Actually, I know you will find this hard to believe, but actually *I* run everything. I know, I know…I seem like some broke guy who ain’t got nothing going on, but actually I run everything here on Earth. But I need lots of underlings to work for me, and I suspect that all my employees all work for Jew Central Control. The kike bastards steal all the money, take all the women, and they leave me with nothing, holding the bag!

      It sucks!

      You fuckers!

  1. Robert, those Sunni Arab states have been in bed with Israel for a long time now. And instead of calling it socialism of fools, why don’t you give a detailed, brilliant class analysis of the present financial and economic situation?

  2. Dear Robert
    Your claim that the Israeli armed forces are some extension of the Pentagon is totally unconvincing. The Israeli armed forces serve Israeli interests only.
    The US has dozens of military bases all over the world. It doesn’t need Israel for its imperial purposes, sorry, for the defense of freedom everywhere. The US fought two wars in the Middle East, and in both cases it had to ask its “strategic asset” to stay out of it. What on earth is the use of an ally that you have to ask to stay away when you are fighting a war. It is like a security guard that you have to ask to step aside when someone is attacking.

    Regards. James

    1. There is a deep alliance between the two militaries, carefully constructed over decades by neocons like JINSA. Read up on JINSA and get back to me.

      It’s not that Israel is an arm of US imperialism, it’s more that Israel is an ally of US imperialism, and more particularly that the two militaries have gotten all wound up with each other in a military alliance to the point where their needs and values almost seem to be the same.

      It’s an *alliance*.

        1. It is, but there is still an alliance between the two militaries. Read up on JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.

          In addition to a bunch of Jews, Cheney and Rumsfeld are some of the highest ranking members.

  3. Did you guys watch the new video that was leaked that showed Netanyahu back in 2001 bragging about how Israhell could do whatever it wanted, but Uncle Shlomo would still back it, because the Jews control America, and how he was destroying the Oslo Peace Process? Right…., Jewish power is just an insane delusion thought up by those nasty “anti-Semites”!

    1. Jewish money power has a strong grip on the US state, especially the Legislative Branch. Executive branch, not so much. It’s all about Jewish money in elections, especially for the Democratic Party. Democratic Party formula is:

      Jewish $ + Black votes + whatever large White % you can scramble up = win.

      Jewish money controls the US government, but only on the Israel question, and the Obama Administration for some reason has been telling the Jewish money to go take a fucking hike. Plus the Jewish Lobby is splintering and it’s not so monolithic anymore. Bottom line is that the Jewish Lobby in the US is not what it used to be. Jewish $ has power only on Israel and not on any other issue. For instance, they push hate crimes, but no one wants that, so the Jews don’t get their way.

        1. I used to believe that the neocons merely cared about Israel and the Middle East, but it seems they are just as obsessive about meddling in and provoking conflicts in other regions of the world.

        2. I used to believe that the neocons merely cared about Israel and the Middle East, but it seems they are just as obsessive about meddling in and provoking conflicts in other regions of the world. – anon

          Taiwan?

          What do Jews have to do with Taiwan? – Bay Area Guy

          Asian Anon and BAG,

          The NeoCONS have for the longest time been speaking of a “clash of civilizations” (in other words – war) with China (and Russia probably as well) for quite some time now — probably in their narcissistic, delusional aspirations as setting the final stage of Global consolidation and domination in their centuries-long dream of World Dominion, i.e. the “New World Oder“.

          *Brother Anon – your really going to like this anti-NWO site — written by an Asian/Malaysian Nationalist –

          Future FastForward – Preparing for the Future, Now.
          http://futurefastforward.com/

        3. Prole, you are right about neocons and the whole “clash of civilizations,” promoted by those Samuel Huntington and Daniel Pipes types.

        4. I’ve seen that site before Prole. Matthias Chang right?

          Indeed Brother, indeed.

          I read all of his excellent books.

          Prole, you are right about neocons and the whole “clash of civilizations,” promoted by those Samuel Huntington and Daniel Pipes types.

          Unfortunately correct, right?

          Yeah BAG, these evil “clash of civilizations” psychopaths literally want the world to come as close as possible to destroying itself, so they then can become, at least in their own sick, twisted minds the “undisputed’ masters of the universe”.

          Never mind that all they’ll really be “masters” of is a global graveyard. :{

        5. Oh well, Judaism has always been a death cult.

          Well, at least “Judaism” of the “Babylonian” variety — of the Babylonian Talmud, NOT of the Torah-True, Hebrew ‘Old’ Testament.

    1. Robert, I don’t know what’s more bizarre: That, or the belief that Jackie Chan’s mother is Jewish.

        1. ATM, the Jewish neocons are all tied in with US imperialism. They’ve turned into US Imperialists on steroids. As such, they have made a deep alliance with the Gentile imperialists like Rumsfeld, Cheney, Gaffney, Bolton, Bush, Condi Rice, and all the other idiots. They aren’t just for the Jews. The neocons are Americans too. American imperialists.

        2. As such, they have made a deep alliance with the Gentile imperialists like Rumsfeld, Cheney, Gaffney, Bolton, Bush, Condi Rice, and all the other idiots.

          With all due respect, my dear Comrade, those “Gentile” imperialists and other hangers-on idiots, and their aspirations, would be nowhere without being the water-carriers of the Zionist architects of the Middle East fiasco and the subsequent “clash of civilizations” nightmare that they intend to drag the world, and its millions of innocent peoples, into.

  4. Hey Prole, you said you were of Italian descent, right? I like Italians, a lot of my high school classmates were Irish and Italian. By the way, what’s your ideological inclination? Are you a leftist?

    1. I’ll let Prole answer for himself, but I hardly think he’s a “leftist.”

      To the extent that he is, he’s an economic leftist.

      He’s hardly a Cultural Marxist leftist.

      1. By the way why did tulio chimp out on me? Does he not see that what those jig students did in China was highly offensive?

      2. To the extent that he is, he’s an economic leftist.

        He’s hardly a Cultural Marxist leftist.

        Excellent call, BAG.

    2. Hey Bro, thanks for the compliments and your respectful curiosity about me.

      I myself have always enjoyed my political conversations with my Asian pals, always intelligent and spot-on over whatever we are/were discussing without the mawkish pseudo-sentimentality and Pee Cee of other Americans — just like with you.

      As to my ideological inclinations, well, I would probably say they are a mixed-bag of Left and Right (with an occasionally small dose of “Centrism” thrown in for good measure).

      Many of my family in Italy (I’m first generation American) were members, or at least sympathizers, of the Italian Communist Party — or sympathizers or followers of various types of “Euro-Communism” in general.

      That type of system works fantastic when it is run on a rather small, managible and national level — NOT when it “goes global” — since it economically bankrupts and culturally destroys nations and particular cultures, especially since international Socialism has the Cultural Marxists as its “Priest Class” to legitimate it.

      Many of my family members now are supporters and/or sympathizers of more Italian Nationalist organizations and movements because of all this, but still believe in, primarily, a just Socialistic economy since that is the best overall economic arrangement for the majority of the citizens of the nation. As do I.

        1. In a nut-shell Anon, I believe that both international Socialism AND international Capitalism are a pure, metastisizing cancer to the healthy body-politic of ANY Nation, Tribe or People.

          No exceptions.

        2. 100% agree with you there buddy. So what do you think of Comrade Stalin? He was nationalistic Communist.

          You know Bro, that may well be very possible, I’m just not so sure that Stalin was indeed a true Nationalist or not — in other words, did he become one really due to a genuine belief in such OR did the exigencies of the Second World War force him to assume more of a Russian Nationalist orientation in order to rally the demoralized Slavs behind him?

          I am still learning more and more about this angle of history.

          However, National Bolshevism is almost surely the best overall antidote to the international, nation-wrecking cartels of Capitalism and (Marxist) Socialism.

        3. I believe 1945 was a turning point in world history because as soon as Germany was defeated, the Jews turned on the USSR and took America’s side in the Cold War.

  5. I believe 1945 was a turning point in world history because as soon as Germany was defeated, the Jews turned on the USSR and took America’s side in the Cold War.

    Nearly all the ills that we are collectively facing today was a result of the utterly disastrous two European and world wars (which was actually one war, which began in 1914, and ended in 1945 — with the years 1918 to 1939 merely a reprieve).

    And in 1945, the truly defeated were not primarily the Germans, but the Europeans as a whole.

    As well, in 1945, it was not merely the great and proud Japanese that was “defeated” — BUT all of Asia and her great peoples as a whole.

    Along with these mere military defeats of the “Axis Powers” was the greatest defeat of all: a loss of the ability of nations to chart their own course as to what is truly in the best interests of the common folks of their respective nations – and not merely its “elites”.

    1945 was the year it became, virtually de facto, ‘illegal’ for a nation-state to truly be a nation-state — that is, to act on behalf of its genuine self-interests — rather than as some kind of lap or attack-dog on behalf of Globalist interests (like the US and the UK) or as a target of such Globalist fanatics (such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Kosovo, – and, in the future, like we previously discussed regarding the manufactured “clash of civilizations”, China).

    In other words, “The Syndicate” will take whatever side that will advance their illegitimately international and “Globalist” criminal “interests”.

    And “WW2” will always be their mendacious “justification” for attempting to control and enslave Humanity.

      1. But what do you think of the USSR during the Cold War?

        Probably was far more nationalistic and in control of its national affairs than was the US and most* of Western Europe.

        *General Charles De Gaulle hated “The Syndicate” so much that was one of the reasons for his pulling France out of the NATO “alliance” — the only European country to do so. (This was probably the reason why there was nearly 30 assassination attempts on the General’s life — all unsuccessful ;})

        1. Francis Parker Yockey made the same point. You should really study him if you haven’t already. He basically turned from an Axis supporter during World War II to a Soviet supporter during the Cold War.

        2. Francis Parker Yockey made the same point. You should really study him if you haven’t already. He basically turned from an Axis supporter during World War II to a Soviet supporter during the Cold War.

          Oh yes, thx so much for the reminder! I read his book Imperium over twenty years ago, it was an amazing tome.

          You know as well, that a good number of German National Socialists (‘Nazis’) were actually more sympathetic to the Soviets after the war than they were to the Anglo-American Establishment?!?

          One of its most major figures/spokesmen was Otto Remer, the German General who thwarted the 20 July plot to overthrow the Reich government, and therefore saved Hitler.

          Remer said that if the USSR ever did invade Germany, he would “show the Russians the way to the Rhine” and that SRP members would “post themselves as traffic policemen, spreading their arms so that the Russians can find their way through Germany as quickly as possible”.

          After the war he established “The Socialist Reich Party” before it was officially banned in 1952 by the “Democratic” Anglo-Americans.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Reich_Party

        3. But what do you make of the former National Socialists that collaborated with the Americans instead of Russia, such as Reinhard Gehlen. And I don’t understand how, if Germany had fought a bitter war with Russia for 4 years, they could turn pro-Russian after the war.

        4. But what do you make of the former National Socialists that collaborated with the Americans instead of Russia, such as Reinhard Gehlen.

          And I don’t understand how, if Germany had fought a bitter war with Russia for 4 years, they could turn pro-Russian after the war.

          Right, and this is what makes all this stuff a bit inscrutible and perplexing, to say the least, and why it deserves more research into the matter before a proper judgement can be passed, or before one ideological camp can take credit, one way or the other, for it’s own interpretations of History.

        5. …And I don’t understand how, if Germany had fought a bitter war with Russia for 4 years, they could turn pro-Russian after the war.

          As well anon, I don’t think that even the anti-American Germans were necessarily pro-Soviet as such — just, perhaps, that the Russians, whom they perhaps felt was less under the thumb of Jewish Communists, were more amenable to some kind of Nationalist alliance or understanding than were the über-Capitalist, Mammonite Globalist and nation-wrecking Anglo-Americans.

          At least that was possibly a perception of those Germans who fought the Soviets during the war.

  6. Bob, and readers, delve into ex Jew, ex Wall Streeter, Joachim Martillo’s research into the specifically Jewish nature of the economic ruination of the United States as per runaway parasitical high finance, over at http://www.eaazi.blogspot.com.

    He takes you back to Eastern Europe where much of it began.

    1. It’s nonsense! The financial elite, the bankers and finance sector, act the same everywhere on Earth. They are motivated by capitalist interests. “Jewish” financiers act no different than “non-Jewish” financiers. Actually, they might act a bit better, as some of them are a more progressive type of capitalist.

      I see you subscribe to the socialism of fools.

      And yes, I know Joachim Martillo. Unfortunately, both he and his wife converted to Islam are now both Jewish anti-Semites. I mean hardcores. His analysis of the Jewish role in the latest Depression, as with so many things, is simply wrong.

  7. There is an interesting 1950s and 1960s history of the animosity and contrast between the far larger (it being the U.S.) anti-USSR American Nazi Party of George Lincoln Rockwell and the small scattering of pro-Soviet “neo nazi” National Renaissance Party and other assorted pro-Soviet “neo nazi” outfits then extant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *