Why Are Only White Populaces, Regions and Countries in Need of Diversity?

In the comments to the post Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone!, tulio says:

My point Robert is that mass migrations of one race displacing another race has always been happening. For much of the last 500 years it was whites displacing non-whites off their land. The resources of the Americas, Africa and Asia were used to make Europe wealthy and give it a big economic boost above others. Now these white countries are the wealthiest so they attract economic refugees.

These Indians moving to England aren’t moving there because they want to. Think about it, who wants to move to the other side of the planet where they are going to basically be aliens? They’re simply going out of economic necessity.

Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled. It’s just push-pull economics. Not some grandiose “non-white” conspiracy to eradicate the white genotype. If Europe was poor and China was rich, you’d see whites going to China looking for jobs. People follow the money, it’s just that simple.

First of all, bad example. The Indians moving to the US are the middle class and upper middle class. They are on the high end of Indian society, and they live extremely well for Indians. They only come here because they can live better here, and their country is a shithole, mostly because they have turned it into one. So they are not moving here out of any economic necessity. They just want to move up in the world.

The examples tulio used you previously used were of invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides.

It’s frankly stunning that he compares “invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides” to the mass migration to White lands. It implies that possibly this is what is occurring in White countries. It also implies that the mass migrations to White countries are not a good thing.

Sure, people follow the money. OK, then why is the 3rd World not flooding into Taiwan, South Korea and Japan? Why do the Western elites and Leftists not demand that Taiwan, South Korea and Japan open up their borders to diversity and mass invasion displacing their cultures and genepools? They only demand this for White countries.

It’s only White countries that need diversity! Now why is that?

We also see many articles in the US press about certain US cities, towns and regions that are “too White.” These places are said to be in need of diversity. How come Detroit doesn’t need diversity? How come Bell, California and Monterey Park, California don’t need diversity? Why do only White populaces and regions need diversity? The critics are not answering the question.

Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled.

This is another one of the lies of the Diversitoids, that White countries are not making enough babies, so they have to experience 3rd World Nile-like floods every year. Otherwise…otherwise what? The sky will fall? There are no labor shortages in White countries. Certainly not in the White country that I live in. In the US, the low birth rate is not a problem that needs mass immigration to be remedied. The low White birth rate here is not creating some horrible labor shortage that can only be fixed by having Calcutta crash through the gates.

I think there are several things going on here:

1. Anti-White grudge politics. Most non-Whites don’t like Whites too much. They think we stole all of our money and got it through exploiting them and the people of the 3rd World. In many cases, they say that we invaded their countries and subjugated them. So turnabout is fair play. Since Whites invaded, conquered, colonized, genocided and exploited non-White lands, non-Whites get to do it right back to us as revenge. There can be no other explanation for this mindset.

2. The notion that White lands do not deserve their wealth. Supposedly we stole it, and non-Whites demand that we share it with them in the interests of fairness. But Marx never said that the way to make revolution was for the poor countries to invade the rich countries.

3. The notion that White countries are automatically racist and possibly White Supremacist/Nazi. Most non-Whites and even Jews have been fucked over by Whites at some point in the past. They see a White country, and they think crackers or Nazis. The best way to reduce the crackerness or Nazitude of the place is to mass invade it with non-Whites.

Jews in particular have this worry. A top Jewish figure in the US commented on the declining White percentage in the US and the projection that US Whites will dip below 50% in 2050. “At that point the project will be complete,” he said. “Then, we will never have to worry about the possibility of a White Supremacist Nazi state arising in America again.” The Jewish mindset here is “Never again.” No more White countries = no more possible Nazi states.

4. Naivete. Blacks in particular think that White countries suck because “we be all raciss and shit.” They think by diluting the White population and turning White countries into Brazil or something, things will get better for Blacks. But that’s dubious. We Whites have been pretty nice lately. If Blacks think Whites are bad, Blacks should wait until they have to deal with Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Latin Americans, or East Indians. Living under White rule will seem like paradise.

All of this suggests to be that non-Whites are not our allies on the question of immigration to White countries. They are always going to support mass immigration to White lands for one of the reasons above, which makes you wonder why we should even let them in in the first place.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

158 thoughts on “Why Are Only White Populaces, Regions and Countries in Need of Diversity?”

  1. Thank you for this post, Robert. I really mean it.

    I know this is going to sound very white supremacist of me, but I don’t care.

    We whites need to band together, cut off non-white immigration, and show an overall sense of racial solidarity towards one another. We need to stand up and enact policies by whites, for whites.

    Blacks and other “people of color” certainly do that when given the opportunity. They are black, Hispanic, or Asian first, and they look after their group interests (although Asians less so than others).

    Believe me, unilateral racial disarmament on the part of whites will usher in our extinction.

    We’re the most hated group in the world, our birthrates are declining, and everyone is gleefully anticipating our demise.

    What can we do about it?

    -Completely shut off non-white immigration.
    -Kick out the illegals already here.
    -Completely sever ties with Israel, which engenders anti-American hatred throughout the Muslim world.
    -Related to saying bye bye to Israel, completely end all American imperialist ambitions. After all, invade the world, invite the world, piss off the world.
    -Demand more accountability from our leaders and businesses, which often prefer neoliberal economics and foreign workers over white workers.

    -And overall, cultivate an unapologetic, unrelenting pro-white attitude. This will help us accomplish all of the above.

    Now I know, some of you are thinking, “my god, he’s a vicious white supremacist. ‘Pro-white’ is just a euphemism for a racist discriminator, etc.”

    But you know what? I don’t care if you regard me as such.

    I am white, so therefore I am going to be for my people. If advancing white interests means going against black, Hispanic, or other interests, then so be it.

    No other majority group puts up with such crap from minorities or allows aliens to displace them in their own countries. I say it’s time we emulate the Chinese and Japanese in terms of their nationalism, pride, and self-interest.

    Enough of this phony white liberal “colorblind” crap.

    Far from winning over non-whites and placating them, this colorblind liberalism only shows weakness and convinces non-whites of our hypocrisy (“colorblind racist,” as Abagond would say).

    My fellow white people, it is time to man up, and assert ourselves, and deal with our issues, be they internal (certain problems of drug use, drunk driving, child molesters, and other self-inflicted and pathologies) or external (declining numbers, hostile non-whites, Cultural Marxism, etc).

    The time is now.

    1. first off you tool north america was always asias land as they crossed the berring strait 2ndly whites have only been in north america for under 500 years 3rdly whites have only evolvd for the last 6000 years and europe was once a black occupance just so your peebreaded head knows now you DO! white people dont belong anywhere to be honest and you should all eat a giant D and DiE!

      1. Great post! I agree with you 100%! Blacks have been around much longer than whites…and have absolutely nothing to show for it. If it wasn’t for whites you would be chucking a spear someone in Africa.

        1. But, there’s nothing wrong with that. Whites need to focus on their own problems, if they want to fight other peoples that’s fine but, quit the messianic we improve you bs. You’re seeing the results of it in front of you,

        2. I agree with K.
          I’m really quite surprised that people don’t seem to understand ‘civilization varies greatly from place to place and time to time’.

          Sometimes groups can massively over-perform or under-perform their IQs.
          Just because Blacks were doing something terrible like ‘chucking spears’, around the time of Eurasian contact, doesn’t mean they would have always been doing that.
          Duh!

          These Alt-Reichers rarely meet any normal level of abstraction, at all

      2. Whites created the western world that you sacks of shit enjoy. Whites don’t need you. We created this desired society and now watch third world savages flock to it.

        If whites left the U.S., it would be a third world country because we see what happens when blacks, Latinos and Muslims are in charge.

        So yeah, fuck you.

        1. Whites did not really create much of anything. As matter of fact, the European settlers throughout the America s have mostly been pretty ordinary people. However, I am not denying the fact that White Christian s are better than others, in most respects.

    2. Diversity means different things to different people. While you may think Africa isn’t diverse, that’s not how the Africans see it. In Nigeria, for example, the mantra is “diversity is our strength.” They have virtually no consciousnesses of being part of some black monolith. Rather they think in cultural and ethnic terms. So from the point of view of Nigerians, they are an exceptionally diverse country, even if 99% of the population is black.

      The idea of universal whiteness is probably an American construct. For a Frenchman or an Englishman, diversity would mean welcoming in other European nationalities.

  2. “All of this suggests to be that non-Whites are not our allies on the question of immigration to White countries.”

    That’s just a little broad. My legal immigrant Asian wife hates illegal immigrants more than anything. She and her relatives complain about being waited on by people who “don’t even speak English.” Some of them waited 20 years to come here legally; some have had relatives denied immigrant visas for insufficient educational attainment; and they resent more than anything the people who snuck across the border with no skills.

    Like I said on the other thread — the ones who came here to live like Americans don’t appreciate the ones who didn’t.

  3. And another thing.

    I constantly hear people say that since whites are already a global minority and will continue to decline in numbers, that we must somehow reconcile ourselves to diversity and displacement.

    I mean, hey, if the world becomes less white, then obviously we must give everything up to the growing number of non-whites, right?

    I say hogwash. Far from making us want to embrace diversity, these pronouncements will only foster a greater sense of white nationalism and self-preservation.

    Every other group, by themselves, is a minority. Does that mean they should jump for joy at the thought of being a minority?

    Think about it.

    1. LOL. There’s probably a sociological term for what’s happening. Demographic decline leads to the kinds of social, political attitudes we are seeing in white people. And “white” is a funny word. I don’t think you could these days get plurality opinion among a Frenchman, German, Russian, Spanish, and Anglo to agree on what is in the interest of white people anymore. And these five groups have historically been the lead “white” groups.

  4. The invasion, exploitation, etc., of White lands by non-Whites wouldn’t necessarily be a matter of revenge. It can be, but it doesn’t have to be.

    It’s what people do to each other, if they see fit. They’ll even make up a justification, if they have to.

  5. I know that either Tulio, Alpha, or Chic Noir might intervene and say that I’m being paranoid and irrational.

    But let me ask them this: Let’s say you’re part of a group that is despised around the world. People hate you, and rightfully so. Your numbers are also declining, and their numbers increasing. Finally, you’re being told that one day you’ll be a minority in countries where you were formally the majority, and that to oppose such change makes you a hater. Also, you’re always being told that what goes around comes around, and that anything bad that happens to you is deserved.

    Now then, do you really think that you’ll be inclined to support diversity and empower those different from you?

    Think about it.

    1. Dude, you are talking crazy. Whites are the most embraced race all across the fucking planet. Anywhere in Latin America, people are caught up on trying to be and look European. I read an article about how Chinese companies hired white reps as representatives of their company because it brings prestige. You think I could ever fucking have my black face as the facade of a Chinese company?? Seriously dude, I’m getting weary of your whiny paranoia. If you think “non-whites” sitting around hating whitey all day, you need to take a nice long vacation from your WN sites because that stuff is fucking with your head, man.

      No group of people have it better on the planet than white males.

      1. Whites are the most embraced race all across the fucking planet.

        I think you’re mistaking economic and political necessities/envy for genuine embrace.

        Sure, a lot of people may want to look like us or emulate our success.

        But that hardly means they love us. The kind of “embrace” you speak of is a double-edged sword. While some may want to be like us do to our success, they also are angry at us and resent us.

        Anywhere in Latin America, people are caught up on trying to be and look European. I read an article about how Chinese companies hired white reps as representatives of their company because it brings prestige. You think I could ever fucking have my black face as the facade of a Chinese company??

        Again, economic, political, social necessities/envy.

        That doesn’t the Chinese or Latin Americans love white Americans. Hardly.

        Again, I don’t know exactly what you mean by “embrace.” Envy, economics, and self-loathing may very well be at play, but again, it’s a double-edged sword.

        Seriously dude, I’m getting weary of your whiny paranoia.

        Yes, I do realize that my rhetoric is a bit doomsdayish.

        Something for me to think about.

        If you think “non-whites” sitting around hating whitey all day, you need to take a nice long vacation from your WN sites because that stuff is fucking with your head, man.

        WN sites? Hardly. More like reading what various black bloggers, activists, and what have you. More like having my angry Asian friend in high school tell me that if whites get wiped off the face of the earth, they have it coming (and I agree with him). Etc.

        Of course, you could argue that I’m blowing these things out of proportion, that most “non-whites” are not really like that, and that it’s just a few radicals.

        Besides, being the student of world history that I am, I know that an egalitarian, loving society just ain’t happening. Someone is going to get screwed, one way or another. I just want to ensure that my people in the end don’t get screwed.

        No group of people have it better on the planet than white males.

        Well, I’d say Chinese, Korean, and Japanese men in their own countries have it better, since they don’t have to deal with “diversity” or similar headaches.

        And yes, to the extent that we do have it good (relatively speaking, we do), that won’t last much longer.

  6. Robert, since you’re so passionate about preserving your race from displacement, I’m sure you’ll know where I’m coming from when I don’t approve of white rice chasers going after Asian women?

      1. I know BAG. I think Rob’s being hypocritical when he dismisses our concerns on this topic yet he wants to maintain his own race. Robert, some advice for ya, if you want to keep the white race pure, don’t fucking marry a gook! Simple as that.

        1. You misunderstand me. I do not want to keep my race pure. Whites can intermarry with other folks all they wish to. Furthermore, we can go extinct for all I care.

          I just think that White countries ought to have self-determination. They ought to be able to decide what the future should look like. If they want to be inundated with immigrants, fine. If not, well, that’s their right. Icelandics ought to have the right to decide that the future looks White, or not.

          Currently we have no vote on such matters. The decisions are all made by some elites who for some unfathomable reasons have decided that all White countries need to be flooded with non-Whites.

          Why is that? Why are only White countries in need of diversity? Why do all White countries need to get flooded with non-Whites? I’m just asking some questions, that’s all.

          I’m opposed to mass immigration, but not to intermarriage or race mixing. Further, I’m not opposed to non-White immigration to the US. I just want it slowed down. A lot.

        2. Well no.

          I guess you’re more of a recent reader, but Robert doesn’t exactly have much love for white nationalists.

          (although, there are times when he’s willing to admit that WN’s get it right, and that they at least do something for white people).

          Robert just doesn’t like PC “whites are bad and must embrace diversity” dogma espoused by the far left.

          He’s certainly not opposed to non-white immigration and interracial marriage per se. He just doesn’t like the way these diversity dogmas are forced down our throats.

        3. Hell no!

          I hate White nationalists with a passion. They’re nasty, ugly, mean, low-down, super-racist Whites. They’re the extreme end of White racism. Not only that, but they’re idiots and freaks to boot.

          OTOH, I must admit sadly that a lot of the things that the WN say are true. That’s the sad part. Even evil people have factual and interesting things to say. I’m sure Hitler made many reasonable remarks and observations in his life.

          Race realist, yes. White nationalist, no!

        4. Speaking of which, I can’t believe there still U.S. military bases in South Korea and Japan. Talk about a fucking anachronism. Of course, the present leader of South Korea is an ass-kissing piece of shit.

        5. Speaking of which, I can’t believe there still U.S. military bases in South Korea and Japan. Talk about a fucking anachronism. Of course, the present leader of South Korea is an ass-kissing piece of shit.

          Well asian anon, one of the things on my list regarding what we whites must do to survive is to immediately end all forms of American imperialism.

          We’re not the damn policemen of the world. Let the world be the world, and let us focus on our issues. Getting us involved in foreign entanglements damns us in the long run.

        6. That’s Pat Buchanan’s line as well. Do you think Buchanan is simply a paleocon, or do you think he’s shading into white nationalist territory.

        7. Buchanan is interesting.

          I believe that he is a white nationalist, addition to being a paleocon (the two often go hand in hand).

          However, since he’s a mainstream pundit working for MSNBC, he does have to temper some of his views.

          In some editorials I’ve read of his that were actually printed in the SF Chronicle, he uses terms such as “African American” and other PC terms.

          Out of all the pro-white activists out there, I’ve never really liked Pat Buchanan that much.

          -He’s a defender of Hitler (ie. He thinks Hitler wasn’t so bad and got forced into WWII, etc). And as I’ve pointed out before (if you want, I can copy and paste an old comment I made on Jew Among You’s blog), Hitler was one of the greatest enemies of the white race.

          -He makes ignorant and crass statements such as “whites built this country.” While he is fundamentally correct, he falls into anti-racist traps. He sets himself up to be lectured on how black labor, Chinese railroad labor, Mexican bracero labor, etc all helped build the country.

          Now, if he had said, “while other groups made notable contributions, whites are the ones who primarily built this nation. They were the leaders of the American Revolution, all signatures on the Declaration of Independence are white signatures, etc.”

          Had he said that, he would have been attacked, but it would have been an easier position to defend.

          I simply thinks that Pat Buchanan, whether it’s defending Hitler or making foolish remarks, isn’t good for the movement.

          -For some reason, I just don’t like his face. He has the look of a weird and creepy old man. Maybe I’m just being weird, but psychology shows that we do react to certain people depending on their faces.

          My favorite white thinkers and/or activists are Paul Craig Roberts, the late Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, James Edwards of The Political Cesspool (not an intellectual, but a young and dedicated activist) and Jared Taylor (Not exactly an intellectual, but nevertheless a cultured and well educated WN with more of an international perspective, something many American whites regardless of ideology sorely lack. I also don’t agree with his views on racial science, but that’s another story).

          But yeah, I’ve never been a big fan of Buchanan.

        8. I know Jared. He would definitely be described as an intellectual in normal US society. He has a Master’s Degree from Yale you know. He also has a degree from the Sorbonne.

        9. I guess you’re right. Although we normally think of scholars and intellectuals as those with PhD’s.

          But yes, Taylor is a Yale graduate and also received a Masters in international economics from Institut d’Études Politiques de Paris.

          He’s also fluent in French and Japanese.

          What I admire about Jared Taylor is that he runs American Renaissance because it’s what he truly believes in.

          If he wanted to make money, he could work with American companies doing business in Japan (as I think he did in the past. In fact, before he became a white nationalist, he wrote a book that was a critical and nuanced analysis of Japan’s growing power).

          He’s also an accomplished Classical and Jazz musician.

          I don’t think he really makes much money from Amren.

        10. Yeah, I think Taylor got is BA from Yale. He got his Masters from that prestigious French university I mentioned.

        11. If he wanted to make money, he could work with American companies doing business in Japan (as I think he did in the past.

          Taylor still does this. At least within the past year or so anyway.

        12. Since he’s financially secure and could live an otherwise quite life (although, many elite WN’s come from more privileged backgrounds).

          I’m just curious as to what drove Taylor towards white nationalism in the first place, since most financially secure and comfortable whites are rather apathetic and content to live in their bubble.

          Carol Swain thinks it has to do with the fact that he was the only white kid growing up in an ethnocentric and relatively homogenous society such as Japan.

          There’s some evidence for this. In Amren articles and elsewhere, Taylor frequently voices his admiration for the Japanese and how they deal with issues such as immigration.

          Taylor himself claims that his days in college witnessing radical blacks and leftists acting out, as well as his travels to West Africa drove him towards WN.

          (he cites the story of how the Ivory Coast was much more developed and advanced than Liberia. When he asks a Liberian why that is, he apparently replies, “we never had the benefit of being colonized by the French”)

        1. What are Jared Taylor’s views on foreign policy and the imperialism? This is a good way to know if one is sincere or not. Lawrence Auster for instance wants war with Iran, continued support to Jizzrael, and other neocon garbage.

        2. I don’t know what Taylor’s views are on foreign policy and American imperialism.

          As a WN and paleocon, I would guess that he’s opposed to the American Empire, because he sees it as inviting diversity and getting the U.S entangled in foreign messes.

          At the same time, what really distinguishes him from other WN’s is that he never really tackles the Israel or Jewish issue. As a result, he’s enjoyed more Jewish support than any other WN organization.

          So no, I don’t know about his views on Israel or other aspects of foreign policy.

          Although I’m certain he’s no neocon.

        3. You should be careful about thinking too highly of Taylor. The very fact that he doesn’t tack the Jewish question is telling. Just remember the conservative idiots in the 1970s who allowed former Trotskyite commies, ie., neocons, to enter the GOP, and the rest is history.

  7. If Blacks think Whites are bad, Blacks should wait until they have to deal with Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Latin Americans, or East Indians. Living under White rule will seem like paradise.

    You said it.

    Unlike whites, these groups won’t be hindered by white guilt, political correctness, of self-loathing Cultural Marxism (to be sure, they use Cultural Marxism, but only against whites).

    As Thaddeus once brilliantly told Abagond a while back, he’s got to be out of his mind if he thinks that as a minority in China, he could run a blog critical of the majority.

    I know that some black radicals celebrate the rise of China and other countries “of color,” but believe me, if China ever ruled this country, black minorities would not enjoy anywhere near the same level of rights that they do now.

    Paul Mooney certainly wouldn’t be able to get away with mocking the majority Chinese, much less make a handsome living doing it.

    1. As a black man, I am not afraid of Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, East Indians, etc living in America. These groups haven’t done a damn thing to oppress me or any of my ancestors. In fact, the majority of these non-whites voted for Obama. The majority of whites voted against Obama. Why should I fear these non-whites? I don’t see Chinese and Indians running to the Tea Party and talking about the first black president not being a “real American.”

      1. You just wait.

        All of those groups seriously hate Blacks. It’s a well-known fact. They are vastly more racist towards Blacks than Whites are. Right now they are in the stick it to Whitey phase, but you just wait.

        You’re naive.

        1. Don’t pretend you know what the dark side of the moon looks like. First of all, I doubt that the Chinese will ever have a desire nor will circumstances occur where they will have to rule over Africans or African of the African “diaspora”. And given that this far-fetched situation occured, I highly doubt it will resemble any dynamic resembling the black-white one.

        2. Quote : ”

          You just wait.

          All of those groups seriously hate Blacks. It’s a well-known fact. They are vastly more racist towards Blacks than Whites are. Right now they are in the stick it to Whitey phase, but you just wait.

          You’re naive.

          Robert is right , where i live their are lots of east indians and they hate blacks, hell they even dislike whites also, unless you are rich or have a nice daughter for their son to marry.
          I even see Blacks and Whites working together, because the Asians are introducing a way of life that they don’t like.
          To the Blacks i say, it’s better to deal with the Devil you know than the Devil you don’t know.

        3. To ged:

          “all those groups seriously hate blacks”

          One thing whites HAVE to stop doing:

          Stop trying to be the spokespeople for other races. How the f+ck do you know that Chinese REALLY hate blacks!

        4. Dear Hacienda

          How the F**k that you don’t know that Chinese people and most Asians don’t hate blacks.
          As i said where “I” Live there are a variety of Asians, i know a bit of how they think about blacks and other peoples who are not of their tribe.
          So i least i can speak from some sort of experience , do you think that they are you r brown skin brothers ? you seem to think that you guys are the same and that your cause is the same , very naive ,they hate dark skin they worship light complexion.
          They will use you, black people will do all the grunt work, take all the broken bones and they will stay in the back ground and emerge as the good guys.
          Thing are calm because their numbers are pretty low , let it go up and your gonna see a whole different kind of people , so I’m not speaking for other people i’m speaking from experience .
          If you have a mind to why don’t you study the history of Asians in the Southern Caribbean , especially Guyana and see what they think about Blacks and Whites.

        5. I’d say Asians look down on blacks more than hate them. Unless of course they are personally robbed or have a crime committed against them.

        6. Anon, the ones I know best are Japanese. They seriously hate Blacks. It’s a deep and abiding hatred. Japanese see themselves as the most civilized people on Earth. To the Japs, Blacks are the utter antithesis of every high civilizational value that the Japanese stand for. In a word, Blacks are simply animals.

          Japanese don’t waste much time talking about Blacks, because they just don’t deal with them all that much. I taught school for a while in Gardena, California. It’s long been sort of Little Japan in California. Even a lot of FOB types go straight there because many people there still speak Japanese.

          It’s near South Central LA though, and it’s becoming Black. The schools are now about 50-50 Black and Japanese. It’s one of the most bizarre combos you have ever seen. The Japanese students are model students and cause absolutely zero problems. There was little to no interaction between the two groups.

          Have you ever heard of these Black guys who run around impregnating like 7 different women, fathering kids by all of them, and then never living with or supporting any of them? That’s the utter antithesis of everything the Japanese male stands for. That Black man who does is *acting like a dog.* That’s what dogs do. Japanese think dogs are low animals. In Japanese, to call someone a dog is a very low insult.

  8. I know that some black radicals celebrate the rise of China and other countries “of color,” but believe me, if China ever ruled this country, black minorities would not enjoy anywhere near the same level of rights that they do now.

    http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?itemid=73&catid=2&subcatid=6

    “The opium problem was solved with a declaration that anybody found using it or selling it would be put to death.”

    http://www.drdave.org/Articles/csamwin04.htm

    “In 1949, when China’s communist government took power, there were 70 million opium addicts. The communists shut down the opium dens and declared the nation drug free, claiming that heroin addiction was a consequence of the capitalist system. Because of draconian measures and capital punishment of drug abusers, heroin addiction rates decreased dramatically. In 1988 it was estimated that there were less than 70,000 heroin addicts in all of China.”

    1. Good information Uncle Milton, but what does drug use have to do with it?

      I’m mainly talking about freedom of speech, the right to vote, etc.

      1. Okay, I guess the point is that while certain pathologies might decrease, minorities wouldn’t exactly enjoy a ton of freedoms living under Chinese rule.

        1. Okay, I guess the point is that while certain pathologies might decrease, minorities wouldn’t exactly enjoy a ton of freedoms living under Chinese rule.

          No one would – whether it’s Hillbilly meth heads or Oakland crack dealers. Police brutality is a big complaint in the Black community. My take is that any person arguing (or not) with a (PRC) Chinese police officer could expect a serious beat down with little recourse. Social control in the PRC (including limiting speech..) is paramount. The parents, friends, and relatives (many of which were of relatively high status..) of the victims of the Tienanmen Square incident have to keep quiet.

          http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/sep/26/china.internationalcrime

  9. To Robert:

    Sure, people follow the money. OK, then why is the 3rd World not flooding into Taiwan, South Korea and Japan?

    There are people from less advantaged countries migrating to Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan but at markedly lower rates than the US. Generally these are Chinese (mainland) Filipino, Thai, and Vietnamese migrants. However it harder to maintain legal residency or get citizenship than the US or Western Europe.

  10. It’s frankly stunning that he compares “invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides” to the mass migration to White lands. It implies that possibly this is what is occurring in White countries. It also implies that the mass migrations to White countries are not a good thing.

    I don’t know where you keep getting the idea that I’m comparing non-white immigration to invasions and conquests. Non-whites moving to the West are looking for opportunity, not to colonize. I’ll say it once more. It’s interesting to me that whites are complaining about non-whites moving to their countries when whites have done the same in reverse, then complain when the table is turned. If non-whites shouldn’t live in white lands, then also demand that Australians hand Australia back over to the Aboriginees and return to England. Demand that white Americans and Canadians return to Europe and give it back to the Native Americans. Nobody ever asked the Aboriginals and AmerIndians if they wanted white immigration. At least be consistent.

    Sure, people follow the money. OK, then why is the 3rd World not flooding into Taiwan, South Korea and Japan? Why do the Western elites and Leftists not demand that Taiwan, South Korea and Japan open up their borders to diversity and mass invasion displacing their cultures and genepools? They only demand this for White countries.

    I would guess that these E. Asian countries are not hospitable towards foreigners. As for why Western elites don’t demand immigration for them, how can they? That’s like dictating to them what their housing code standards should be. We have no jurisdiction over such affairs and they aren’t going to listen to us anyway. I don’t hear any American arguing that Europe should open its borders nor do I hear European leftist saying such about America. People can of course express whatever their opinion about one’s own nation.

    It’s only White countries that need diversity! Now why is that?

    Who exactly is saying that?

    We also see many articles in the US press about certain US cities, towns and regions that are “too White.” These places are said to be in need of diversity. How come Detroit doesn’t need diversity? How come Bell, California and Monterey Park, California don’t need diversity? Why do only White populaces and regions need diversity? The critics are not answering the question.

    Can you point to any examples in the press because I’ve never seen what you’re speaking of. Who in the mainstream press says that certain regions are “too white” and need diversifying?

    This is another one of the lies of the diversitoids, that White countries are not making enough babies, so they have to experience 3rd World Nile-like floods every year. Otherwise…otherwise what? The sky will fall? There are no labor shortages in White countries.

    Their aging populations mean countries with an ever growing number of retirees on very generous social benefits with a shrinking number of people generating revenue for the state. That’s a different issue from unemployment per se. Why do you think Russia is paying families to have more than one kid? And btw, that’s not even working. http://www.slate.com/id/2142366

    1. Anti-White grudge politics. Most non-Whites don’t like Whites too much. They think we stole all of our money and got it through exploiting them and the people of the 3rd World. In many cases, they say that we invaded their countries and subjugated them. So turnabout is fair play. Since Whites invaded, conquered, colonized, genocided and exploited non-White lands, non-Whites get to do it right back to us as revenge. There can be no other explanation for this mindset.

    While that may be the general sentiment of left-leaning non-whites(as well as some whites) with degrees in liberal arts, it’s not something the average non-white thinks about much. It’s like whites who think blacks walking around fuming about reparations and I can only think of a few instances in my life where a black person has even brought the subject up. Even behind closed doors.

    4. Naivete. Blacks in particular think that White countries suck because we be all raciss and shit. They think by diluting the White population and turning White countries into Brazil or something, things will get better for Blacks. But that’s dubious. We Whites have been pretty nice lately. If Blacks think Whites are bad, Blacks should wait until they have to deal with Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Latin Americans, or East Indians. Living under White rule will seem like paradise.

    Like I said in response to BAG. No Chinese or Korean man has ever hung my ancestors from trees and held me, my parents or my grandparents back from anything. I’m not worried about them. I see them as pretty harmless. at least the ones that become Americanized.

    1. “Non-whites moving to the West are looking for opportunity, not to colonize.”

      I agree, and would add that most Europeans who moved here from Europe after the Civil War were also looking only for opportunity, not to colonize. I’m annoyed by descendants of non-white immigrants who condemn all white Americans as “settlers” and exempt themselves. You are right that this sentiment is mostly confined to people who spent too much time in liberals arts programs.

      “If non-whites shouldn’t live in white lands, then also demand that Australians hand Australia back over to the Aboriginees and return to England. Demand that white Americans and Canadians return to Europe and give it back to the Native Americans. Nobody ever asked the Aboriginals and AmerIndians if they wanted white immigration. At least be consistent.”

      I agree.

      1. And who’s race is governing native Indians country? Whose face is on the Canadian dollar bills? Would you care to elaborate on that? What about immigration and the judiciary system policing etc.? Whites should all be deported and exterminated. Also whites stole over 695 trillion GBP of India’s wealth.

    2. Like I said in response to BAG. No Chinese or Korean man has ever hung my ancestors from trees and held me, my parents or my grandparents back from anything. I’m not worried about them. I see them as pretty harmless.

      Like Robert said, just you wait.

      They don’t have much power now and some (mainly upper middle class and educated Americans) buy into this whole “people of color” ideology for the purpose of striking at a common enemy.

      But if China becomes the next empire and were ever to take over, believe me, blacks would be screwed. You see, China doesn’t have any belief in minority rights, freedom of speech, etc.

      Yeah, you can rail against us all you want, but at least you have the right to complain about us and agitate against us to your heart’s content, though little success you might have.

        1. No, that’s not my point.

          We would all be screwed under Chinese rule.

          The point I’m trying to make is that if blacks think they have it bad under a bunch of white “colorblind racists,” then just wait till they have to deal with the authoritarian Chinese.

        2. To BAG:

          The point I’m trying to make is that if blacks think they have it bad under a bunch of white “colorblind racists,” then just wait till they have to deal with the authoritarian Chinese.

          I think it’s very unlikely the Chinese would ever take over the US.. at least not in our lifetimes.

      1. I don’t think you have to worry too much about the Chinese. I think the economic and environmental collapse is going to take them down as well as us. I don’t think there will be any more empires after the US. Globalism is going to hit the wall, and things will get more localized.

        Of course I believe in peak fossil fuels. I don’t know what the consensus is on this blog.

        But the Chinese are gonna have their own problems. They’re poisoning their own population with their insane level of industrial pollution, and their labor problems are only going to get worse.

        1. At least the Chinese can actually DARE to go on strike – Chinese workers (in an economy growing at 10+% per annum) know they have whip hand.
          By contrast American workers – shit scared and pussified can’t even dare to raise a squeak of protest at management maltreatment.With 10% + unemployment such a course of acyion will lead to job loss, house loss, wife loss, child loss and eventual self-destruction.

        2. That’s funny. Supposedly, the Chinese, and other Asians are conformist, authoritarian types who shouldn’t be going on strike, yet the supposedly freedom-loving and independent-minded Americans are a bunch of pussified lemmings who don’t even realize how corrupt and disgusting their own system is.

        3. Oh I agree, Freud, I admire them. All the strongest leftist movements are in Asia and South America. The Republicrat corporatocracy, with the best mass-media and school propaganda money can buy, has turned Americans into fat, atomized slugs. Pitiful.

          I just don’t think globalism is gonna last long enough to enable another empire.

      2. Who here is railing against “you”? Is there some generic angry black guy you think you’re debating with here? I get along with most whites fine as well as most Hispanics and Asians. Personally I don’t think anybody is out to get me or trying to hold me back from anything.

        As for China “taking over”, I don’t think they’ll be taking over the United States anytime soon. Their threat may be economic or military, but as far as Chinese-Americans go, my interaction with them is benign and I feel indifferent toward them at worst.

        1. Who here is railing against “you”? Is there some generic angry black guy you think you’re debating with here?

          I’m not entirely sure, to be honest. I’m mainly thinking of leftist/anti-racist blacks.

          I get along with most whites fine as well as most Hispanics and Asians

          As do I.

          You can get along with people of different races and be friends with them and still be racist and angry about race (as am I).

          but as far as Chinese-Americans go, my interaction with them is benign and I feel indifferent toward them at worst.

          Same here.

          @ Uncle Milton

          I think it’s very unlikely the Chinese would ever take over the US.. at least not in our lifetimes.

          You’re probably right.

          But with the U.S becoming more and more of a 3rd world country and China rising as an empire (as evidenced by its enormous economic influence, neocolonialism in Africa, etc), my belief isn’t entirely farfetched.

          And if one country does rise from the ashes of the American Empire, it will be China.

          Although again, you’re right. There’s a good chance that won’t happen, at least in my lifetime.

        2. And yes, for the purpose of full disclosure, I admit that I too made some hostile and nasty remarks.

          I’m hardly an innocent saint.

          I guess we humans are just an irrational species.

  11. To Anon:

    That’s funny. Supposedly, the Chinese, and other Asians are conformist, authoritarian types who shouldn’t be going on strike..

    Very long history of peasant rebellions in China as you linking know… seems similar (on a smaller scale..) As for Americans… zombiefied by multiple drugs (real and figurative…) and are literally and figuratively fat. Give me convenience or give me death. How about both and supersized..?

    1. And at least a couple of peasants became Chinese emporers. Honghu, who destroyed Mongol rule and
      started the Ming Dynasty. Hard to argue that Americans are more convenience driven than Chinese. I’ve met scores of Chinese who are pleasure driven, go-with-the-flow people.

      1. To Hacienda:

        Hard to argue that Americans are more convenience driven than Chinese. I’ve met scores of Chinese who are pleasure driven, go-with-the-flow people.

        Do you mean Chinese in China versus Americans..? Well I will phrase it this way.. In my opinion Chinese are more driven than Americans. They are certainly paid less and have more problematic work conditions both of which would give rise to unionization.

        1. Both. Chinese are a pretty natural people, and nature is as nature does. Americans are more “tight-ass” than you might think.

    1. anon, are you Asian-American? I’m new to this blog, so I don’t know where your hatred of Jews comes from.

      It baffles me.

      1. LaFleur, I’m assuming you are a leftist, right? As a leftist, you yourself should have plenty of reasons not to like the “Chosen”.
        For one thing, who’s responsible for the current financial catastrophe and looting of
        workers: Ben Shalom Bernanke, Lloyd Blankfein, Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin etc.
        Who’s responsible for pushing for a catastrophic war on Iran: AIPAC, Israel itself, various Jew neocons.
        Who’s trying to pass laws that would destroy freedom of speech and criminalize all criticisms of Jews and Israhell: ADL, various other Jew organizations.

      2. This place is like Anti-Semite Central. We attract em from the four corners of the globe for some reason. Korean anti-Semites, Native American anti-Semites, you name it, we got it. Bad weirdness, man.

        1. “This place is like Anti-Semite Central. We attract em from the four corners of the globe for some reason. Korean anti-Semites, Native American anti-Semites, you name it, we got it”

          Maybe people are just smarter and more peceptive than we think. All though I think white nationalists go a little jew crazy sometimes, I myself have no love for the jew.

  12. To Bay Area Guy:

    Okay, I’ll be even more honest.

    Reading one of Ankhesen Mie’s comments yesterday over at Abagond rubbed me the wrong way, and put me in a unusually angry and nasty racial mood.

    I read it and almost replied that: “yes I’ve seen White males trembling around Asian and Brazil women…. but that it wasn’t out of fear.”

    Don’t take this stuff seriously… oh yeah I generally bleep over Anon’s and Hoff/Heg’s comments about Jews also.

    1. I generally bleep over Anon’s and Hoff/Heg’s comments about Jews also.

      That’s interesting.

      Of course, I too have discussed the disproportionate influence of Jews in negative movements (ie. Zionisim, neoconservatism, Cultural Marxism, etc) but until recently I’ve never really talked about it that much.

      I think Asian anon started me on that direction. Before him, we didn’t discuss Jews a ton on this blog.

      Of course, I’m not trying to attack him, and he does make some good points, but he can go a little too far at times.

      At least he took my advice to avoid racial/ethnic slurs. I don’t think he’s said “kike” since then.

    2. I read it and almost replied that: “yes I’ve seen White males trembling around Asian and Brazil women…. but that it wasn’t out of fear.”

      I guess you did actually end up making that reply!

      I’m proud of you, Milton!

      (no, I really mean it)

      1. Asian anon, some of what you say is correct. I don’t recall all of your factual statements, but some of them have been incorrect.

        (ie. the claim that Jews orchestrated the Bolshevik murders)

        Even WN’s at The Political Cesspool don’t push that claim.

        Jews are a very touchy subject. You have to properly pick and choose your battles.

  13. Don’t take this stuff seriously…

    Yeah, I have trouble with that.

    I get very passionate about these issues and sometimes get a little too worked up.

    I said some rather rude things that were a bit uncalled for. For some reason, when I debate these types, I turn especially nasty.

    Yeah, maybe I just need to ignore these black anti-racist types. I’d be happier that way.

  14. Interracial relationships should be banned altogether. Blacks should stick with blacks, whites should stick with whites, Asians stick with Asians etc. Makes me cringe everytime i see a young Filipino woman with an older white man. Has to stop man…has to stop.

    Apart from that, population control globally would be a strong solution to prevent non-white migration to white lands so mr whitey doesn’t have to complain so much.

    Strangely enough, I agree with most of this ‘liberal race realism’ thing.

  15. I would say I’m anti-Zionist, but not anti-Semitic.

    Zionists are one of the most despicable bunch of people you will ever come across.

    1. I feel bad for ‘Arabs’ (Palestinians aren’t quite – but whatever) in general. Their countries are fucked by the ‘Judeo-American Sphere’ (Fuck you EPGAY- we weren’t trying to “help” Iraq), then they have to flee their countries and get targeted as invaders. That’s perhaps the biggest casualty of neoconservatism.

      Jews have a right to advocate for their interests – but I think putting gung-ho Neocons like Cheney, Bush, Bolton, etc. in the oval office again is a bad idea.

  16. To Anon:

    What about Russia?

    Re: China and Russia… yep quite possible that China will absorb the Russian Far East but I doubt it would be through violence.

  17. Dear Robert and others
    Let’s make a few things clear.
    1 – Immigrants aren’t invaders. Invaders carry guns, while immigrants carry documents. Illegal immigrants aren’t invaders either. They are like stowaways protected by some of the passengers and crew members on the ship because they perform services for a pittance. Comparing non-white immigration into white countries today with the white colonialism of the past is quite silly.
    2 – Minoritization is not the same as displacement. Minorities can stay where they are and enjoy the same rights as the majority, although they are often threatened by assimilation, especially linguistic minorities. The Amerindians in North America were indeed displaced because they were locked up in reserves while the whites took and settled nearly all the land that they had occupied before. Whites in the US may have been displaced in some localities, but they still own most of the country and still hold most of power. I don’t believe in diversity, but I don’t believe in hysteria either.
    3 – We should stop thinking in terms of a dichotomy of whites and non-whites. Instead, we should look at the racial landscape as a polichotomy of whites, yellows, browns, blacks, mestizos and more. Whites may become a minority, but they’ll remain the largest minority for a long time. Consider a country in which 40% is white, 15% black, 15% yellow, 15% brown and 15% mestizo. No racial group has the majority, but whites are in a much more favorable position than the other 4 groups because they can make the difference between a majority and a minority 4 times while the other races can make such a difference only once.

    Regards. James

  18. This issue reminds me of the stupid right wing argument that “America must be great- everyone wants to come here (implying that the U.S. is the only favored destination for immigrants)”.
    Well- America might be great compared to must countries (not saying a lot), but so are most affluent, Westernized, countries. The U.S. is special in a few ways: The U.S. doesn’t even try to enforce its immigration laws. We are easier to sneak into. And, we are pretty damn nice and accepting of furriners- compared to most. Also, the country is huge, and already home to the largest groups of ex-pats from anywhere, already. The fact is immigrants PREFER to sneak into ANY “white”, Europeanized, Westernized, affluent, “progressive”, “liberal-democratic” country that is populated with nice, rich white people! Why? Wouldn’t you???? DUH! Also, because white Europeans are responsible for most of the progress made in the last 1,000 years or so! -GO YT! – (/:=))

  19. The idea that South Asian Indians come here or anywhere out of neccesity is a joke. They are rich, upper caste Punjabis who would rather live anywhere else than the sh*thole country that they come from, they leave because they can afford to, using money they have looted from their own poor (lower castes) who are not considered “white” enough under their caste B.S.
    Then, they show up here, buy every f*cking gas station. liquor and sandwich shop, and they had “no choice”? Indians of high status consider themselves to be “whites”, that’s another reason why they love the U.S., England, etc.

      1. Then life will get shittier than it already is for a large segment of the american black population.

        Aren’t latino imigrants, legal and illegal, already excerting considerable pressure on inner city black populations in many cities?

        Couple that with fewer tax dollars from whitey and you’ve got a situation, where black americans have plenty of good reasons for having nostalgic feelings for the time, when whitey had more control.

        I’d guess that those parts of the black community , that still adhere to evangelical christianity would be less affected, since the nuclear family structure would still be strong amongst them and therefore they’d be less dependent of government cash.

  20. The issue is white guilt. No other group in the entire history of mankind has been as willing to flagellate itself over past wrongdoings, both real and perceived, than white westerners from WW2 onwards.

    Preferring one’s own group over others has been, and still is, the rule.

    As white control declines, so will the willingness and ability to finance the government expenditure , which currently supports black welfare moms etc.

    Of course all groups dependent on US government for support will be affected, including many whites.

    My point is just that striking down evil whitey will not result in a blissful, multiethnic utopia, but in a situation considerably worse than even the current one.

    1. Are there really people out there claiming that striking down evil whitey will result in a blissful, multiethnic utopia?

      1. “Are there really people out there claiming that striking down evil whitey will result in a blissful, multiethnic utopia?”

        Yes. This is the basis for Tim Wise’s whole career.

        1. I have not studied Tim Wise in depth, but from what I have read, he has never declared all Whites to be evil or that once Whites are struck down, utopia will be upon us.

        2. “I have not studied Tim Wise in depth, but from what I have read, he has never declared all Whites to be evil or that once Whites are struck down, utopia will be upon us.”

          Tim Wise, The Daily Kos, Nov. 3, 2010

          “Do you hear it?

          The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently?

          Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”

          Read the full article.

          http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/11/an_open_letter_2.php

          It is on a white nationalist site, but one cannot link to the original because lil’ timmy has been at work falsifying it.

    2. No, the issue is economics. In Singapore many of the bankers, oil traders and other professionals are white. The same applies to the more prosperous Middle East Gulf States. These guys make above six figures. So for them, there is an economic benefit to relocating even though Western Europe itself is prosperous. But the overwhelming majority of Western Europeans lack the education and skills to do those jobs. And why bother, when there are plenty of high paying professions in Europe.

      Throughout history, whites have fled economic hardship. To a large degree, white Rhodesians were people who were at the end of their economic rope in Britain. They knew they could go to Africa, steal some land an maybe hire natives at slave wages and get wealthy. Russians are siill fleeing Russia today, as are other Eastern Europeans. Whites are even going to Africa today to find better economic prospects.

      It’s all about economics. In the future you could have white European boat people trying to get into China or Africa. Nothing ever stays the same.

  21. ” OK, then why is the 3rd World not flooding into Taiwan, South Korea and Japan? ”

    They are flooding into non-white countries that allow them to, such as Singapore, the Gulf countries, and others.

    “It’s only White countries that need diversity! Now why is that?”

    Its not. Read above.

    “We also see many articles in the US press about certain US cities, towns and regions that are “too White.” These places are said to be in need of diversity. How come Detroit doesn’t need diversity?”

    They say Detroit needs gentrification, which is a type of reverse diversity.

    1. Singapore, that’s interesting. I’d heard some reason of Southeast Asia (with manufacturing – ex American) actually needed Blacks to do the less skilled work.

  22. A lot of blacks already know that whites are nicer to them than Mexicans, Asians etc. Because of this fact, blacks don’t hate whites as much as people think. I mean think about it. If they hate whites so much, then why are so many black men wanting white chicks? This phenomenon isn’t a black attempt to turn America into Brazil. They simply like white people, and want to breed with white women.

    1. I am not sure any race is nicer. I had bad dealings with the whole lot of them. Maybe it because I am a bastard. But I do not think so.

    2. There are more white women after black men than vice versa. Having said that, black men do not prefer white women. In Africa, especially, the ideal of female beauty is a black woman.

      1. Black men do not prefer for what women, for the most part. Some do. Quite a few do actually. I don’t know how many, but it’s probably at around 20%. The more money he has or the more famous, the more likely he is to have a taste for white women, just from what I’ve observed. Most black guys tend to like light-skinned black women that look mixed (what’s referred to as “redbones”). Or maybe Hispanic women or some exotic looking women like Kim Kardashian.

        Most black guys aren’t really into the typical thin, Aryan looking Taylor Swift type. Though some black guys do, just not the majority. Few black guys prefer 100% pure African looking women, even when very pretty, for example like Lupita Nyongo. I think most brothas like a little cream in their coffee to lighten things up.

        But then it’s pretty much no different with all other men. Latin men don’t prefer indigenous looking women, they want either mestiza or Castillian looks. Indian men like the lightest skin Northern Indian women. Asian men want the lighter skin Asian women. Even dark white guys like Italians go crazy over fairer skin Nordic women. I guess preference for lighter women is universal amongst men. It’s not a black thing.

        1. You’re actually trying to tell me what black guys prefer? Yeah, some black guys prefer white women, just like some white guys prefer black women.

          Some black women prefer dark guys, the darker the better. Some white women also prefer the blackest black men. Some Latino women prefer dark Latino men.

          Not everybody prefers fair women. Some pale women look sickly and unhealthy. In Africa, there’s no preference for light-skinned women. African men probably prefer a medium brown, not too light, not too dark. Both light-skinned and dark skinned people are objects of curiosity in Africa. Nothing hateful, but neither is considered ideal,

      1. Right good point. Possibly blacks marry and like some white people, but they might dislike whites as a group.

  23. The catch that no Alt-Righter wants to admit is that a White is not prevented from moving to Africa, Latin America, and some portions of Asia merely because he is White. It’s just that he doesn’t want to. Big difference.

    1. Whites are actually welcomes to China. They even pay them good money to pretend that they sit on executive boards so that the company has a white face. Even whites with no qualifications can get a job just as a Western showpiece for a Chinese corporation. “Hey we’ve got a white man on our board of directors, we must be a serious company”.

        1. To Tulio:

          Btw, that’s a textbook example of white privilege if there ever was one.

          I’d say it’s a textbook case of tokenism. Like the “clean” “articulate” black hire they will make no material decisions for the company and may be fired as soon as they are not needed.

      1. Same thing goes with ESL teachers as I explained in other threads. They want superior looking whites, without disabilities or ugly features of course, for the image. It’s kind of like a model job for dumb blondes, lol.

        But of course, a lot of whites without deeply thinking about it or caring take the jobs. Of course, there is a lot of money for dumb blondes.

        1. I mean mild disabilities, and the thing about ugly would simply be having brown eyes, in extreme cases, or being fat or skinny. Asia is comically anti-PC.

        2. and ep-gah wants to say “Asians are tough, the way Americans should be.”. Yeah, that’s it. They’re weeding out the lazy and stupid. Really ??? It’s not having a shallow mind which doesn’t give hardly anyone who isn’t a fashion model a chance?

        3. I can’t take EPGAH seriously pretty much with anything he says, when he said, ‘America wanted to help the Iraqis by invading them,’ that was the cover. Obviously now it’s widely accepted fact that that was bullshit. He just might be a troll to make the HBD/WN community look retarded/nutty. Just sayin’.

        4. So Ep-gah is on the payroll of the Southern Poverty Law Center or maybe the FBI. Maybe he’s be a good subject for another Charlie Daniels spy in the local Klan song, lol

          You may not believe it, but this man’s a spy. He’s an undercover agent for the FBI, sent down here to infilatrate the Ku Klux Klan (lyrics)

        5. Well, I mean you can’t admit if he doesn’t see through the most basic neocon propaganda when the vast majority of the world does now, he probably isn’t that bright. It was on Phil’s “Like father like son” article, I didn’t feel like looking for it, wading through many comments.

          You, on the other hand, are just a lowly Jewish peasant, Jason. A Jewish peasant who was pro-Black until you found out Idi Amin killed some of your people;

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0wJ3hj2zWs

        6. Mock me if you wish,
          but the statement that Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, Condi and the Jew Crew were trying to help the Iraqis by invading them, is
          PROFOUNDLY RETARDED.
          PROFOUNDLY.
          NOT EVEN A DEBATE.
          either he is a troll or has an IQ of 40.

        7. Yeah, W. Bush wasn’t a Nazi as all these morons on the left were saying. He was simply a capitalist, a globalist, with mild small town USA sympathies. W. Bush didn’t grow up in the Jim Crow era. He was just a Texan guy with a typical modern outlook, like you’d find in Texas today. He certainly wasn’t a racist.

        8. A lot of this mud slinging is overly political. For instance, W. Bush was called a Nazi cause his family was associated with Nazis, but of course note the Kennedy family was too in the past. Of course, the then invaded the world which reminded people of Hitler, but it was really more like an invasion of multicultural Rome than of Germany.

        9. “Yeah, W. Bush wasn’t a Nazi as all these morons on the left were saying.

          Condoleezza Rice was a bigger Nazi, obsessed with killing Whites.
          Almost as despicable as Mormons letting Blacks join.
          #amrenisdamnright

        10. “Yeah, W. Bush wasn’t a Nazi as all these morons on the left were saying”.

          Yes, but in the modern day or quite recently. Think about it. Nobody says Bush was a Nazi now. Jeb Bush is a CUCK. The whole darn family. A Mestiza who has been called a “dwarf” or “troll” by Mann Coutlter’s minions, as a wife? He touched Black people like Colin Powell and Condolezza Rice (If I don’t go rant to the Buds on AmRen, I’m gonna throw up). If EPGAH had said that in 2003, who would care? But not in 2016.

        11. You call me a racist dick, but this stuff doesn’t come from my brain.
          I got complaints of Mormons letting Blacks join from AmRen “shows how far that church has fallen”

        12. I’m not really siding with W. Bush just looking at reality. Even if your a hardcore left winger you can’t say W. was a Nazi. W. was just a capitalist guy from Texas, with the odds of really being a Jim Crow redneck very remote. He wasn’t raised in the Jim Crow era, and he certainly wasn’t alive during the days of the Bush family Nazi connections.

        13. If anything W. Bush was just a spoiled rich guy. I mean on the movie W. it had a scene where he was on an oil tanker complaining they didn’t have beer on board.

        14. I mean to say W. Bush was on an ocean oil rig (where he was working for a short time before quitting) complaining there was no beer on board.

        1. To Another William Playfair Web:

          Condoleezza Rice was a bigger Nazi, obsessed with killing Whites.
          You’re joking aren’t you?

        2. Yes.
          but I’m thinking of posting that under “comments” on American Renaissance so don’t tell anyone 🙂

      2. To Tulio:

        Even whites with no qualifications can get a job just as a Western showpiece for a Chinese corporation. “Hey we’ve got a white man on our board of directors, we must be a serious company”.

        A means to an end – tokenism – once China achieves economic parity close to South Korea or Japan those positions will no longer exist. Also considering these tales of token whites on Chinese boards have been around for 10 years or more even appearing in the Wall Street Journal I would suggest their use has been curtailed or over blown.

        1. It’s similar, I suppose, to how it seems Mexicans were welcomed to the U.S. in the booming days of the 1920s.

    1. To Jason Y:

      Is it true or exaggerated?

      Some truths and half truths mixed with pure conjecture It comes across as a semi coherent screed.

  24. To Another Playfair Web:

    It’s similar, I suppose, to how it seems Mexicans were welcomed to the U.S. in the booming days of the 1920s.

    They were..? I assume employers liked Mexicans because they provided cheap farm labor, especially in California and Texas. I question whether the average white person was as receptive, perhaps they were. I think there were over 1 million Mexican refugees in the US in 1920 that had fled the revolution.

  25. But if there not white counyries anymore wobt they just return to being ****holes like areas in the U.S. that are not white. Like Detroit Atlanta Chicago DC see my point .

  26. “Their aging populations mean countries with an ever growing number of retirees on very generous social benefits with a shrinking number of people generating revenue for the state. That’s a different issue from unemployment per se. Why do you think Russia is paying families to have more than one kid? And btw, that’s not even working. http://www.slate.com/id/2142366

    This is very true.
    Japan has this issue acutely. It’s median age is going to skyrocket.

  27. There is probably not only one reason but many.

    The east Asian countries don’t take in people because they are obsessed with their cultures and racist.

    All human groups are naive politically, because not every individual has the same goals to begin with, as well as that just being an trait needed to keep large groups together.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *