In the comments to the post Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone!, tulio says:
My point Robert is that mass migrations of one race displacing another race has always been happening. For much of the last 500 years it was whites displacing non-whites off their land. The resources of the Americas, Africa and Asia were used to make Europe wealthy and give it a big economic boost above others. Now these white countries are the wealthiest so they attract economic refugees.
These Indians moving to England aren’t moving there because they want to. Think about it, who wants to move to the other side of the planet where they are going to basically be aliens? They’re simply going out of economic necessity.
Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled. It’s just push-pull economics. Not some grandiose “non-white” conspiracy to eradicate the white genotype. If Europe was poor and China was rich, you’d see whites going to China looking for jobs. People follow the money, it’s just that simple.
First of all, bad example. The Indians moving to the US are the middle class and upper middle class. They are on the high end of Indian society, and they live extremely well for Indians. They only come here because they can live better here, and their country is a shithole, mostly because they have turned it into one. So they are not moving here out of any economic necessity. They just want to move up in the world.
The examples tulio used you previously used were of invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides.
It’s frankly stunning that he compares “invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides” to the mass migration to White lands. It implies that possibly this is what is occurring in White countries. It also implies that the mass migrations to White countries are not a good thing.
Sure, people follow the money. OK, then why is the 3rd World not flooding into Taiwan, South Korea and Japan? Why do the Western elites and Leftists not demand that Taiwan, South Korea and Japan open up their borders to diversity and mass invasion displacing their cultures and genepools? They only demand this for White countries.
It’s only White countries that need diversity! Now why is that?
We also see many articles in the US press about certain US cities, towns and regions that are “too White.” These places are said to be in need of diversity. How come Detroit doesn’t need diversity? How come Bell, California and Monterey Park, California don’t need diversity? Why do only White populaces and regions need diversity? The critics are not answering the question.
Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled.
This is another one of the lies of the Diversitoids, that White countries are not making enough babies, so they have to experience 3rd World Nile-like floods every year. Otherwise…otherwise what? The sky will fall? There are no labor shortages in White countries. Certainly not in the White country that I live in. In the US, the low birth rate is not a problem that needs mass immigration to be remedied. The low White birth rate here is not creating some horrible labor shortage that can only be fixed by having Calcutta crash through the gates.
I think there are several things going on here:
1. Anti-White grudge politics. Most non-Whites don’t like Whites too much. They think we stole all of our money and got it through exploiting them and the people of the 3rd World. In many cases, they say that we invaded their countries and subjugated them. So turnabout is fair play. Since Whites invaded, conquered, colonized, genocided and exploited non-White lands, non-Whites get to do it right back to us as revenge. There can be no other explanation for this mindset.
2. The notion that White lands do not deserve their wealth. Supposedly we stole it, and non-Whites demand that we share it with them in the interests of fairness. But Marx never said that the way to make revolution was for the poor countries to invade the rich countries.
3. The notion that White countries are automatically racist and possibly White Supremacist/Nazi. Most non-Whites and even Jews have been fucked over by Whites at some point in the past. They see a White country, and they think crackers or Nazis. The best way to reduce the crackerness or Nazitude of the place is to mass invade it with non-Whites.
Jews in particular have this worry. A top Jewish figure in the US commented on the declining White percentage in the US and the projection that US Whites will dip below 50% in 2050. “At that point the project will be complete,” he said. “Then, we will never have to worry about the possibility of a White Supremacist Nazi state arising in America again.” The Jewish mindset here is “Never again.” No more White countries = no more possible Nazi states.
4. Naivete. Blacks in particular think that White countries suck because “we be all raciss and shit.” They think by diluting the White population and turning White countries into Brazil or something, things will get better for Blacks. But that’s dubious. We Whites have been pretty nice lately. If Blacks think Whites are bad, Blacks should wait until they have to deal with Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Latin Americans, or East Indians. Living under White rule will seem like paradise.
All of this suggests to be that non-Whites are not our allies on the question of immigration to White countries. They are always going to support mass immigration to White lands for one of the reasons above, which makes you wonder why we should even let them in in the first place.