Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone!

There, I said it.

Read and discuss. Form small groups of four to five by pushing your tables together. Choose one person as leader, another as recorder. Come up with an analysis by the end of class. We will call on you to read aloud your answers. Take careful notes. There will be a quiz on Monday, so be prepared.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

53 thoughts on “Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone!”

  1. You said it Robert.

    All other countries have no problem with trying to keep their countries relatively homogenous.

    But for some strange reason, if whites in white countries want to keep their countries majority white, then that’s racist hate!

    Concerned about being reduced to a minority? Afraid that excessive diversity will lead to perpetual conflict? Don’t want a large mass of poor and uneducated people overcrowding your country?

    Nah, those are all illegitimate concerns. You’re just a racist xenophobe!

    Why is it that so many pathetic white liberals feel some moral obligation to open up the gates of their countries to millions of aliens who despise them and intend to displace them?

    Why is “diversity” always a one way street? Why is it that non-white countries don’t mind keeping outsiders out, but failure of white countries to open their doors is evidence of backward xenophobia?

    And no, don’t give me the whole “well, Europeans colonized everyone else. Immigration is the price they pay for plundering other peoples.”

    If that’s the case, then why is Ireland, which was never a colonial power but a former colony itself, becoming a destination for non-white immigrants, particularly Nigerians?

    No, non-whites come to prosperous white countries just so they can ride the gravy train. They don’t have any respect for their host country’s culture, traditions, or anything else.

    “But they assimilate, provide valuable labor, and greatly contribute to those societies,” you might say.

    Of course, there are exceptions to the rule.

    But for the most part, many of these non-whites in the U.S (mainly Hispanics) don’t assimilate, and are a burden on the nation.

    You can say all you want about how they’re picking grapes and “doing the jobs Americans won’t do,” but that’s hogwash (check Lawrence Auster’s article I posted on the watercooler).

    Besides, millions of poor, uneducated Hispanic kids are dragging this nation down. My dad, who teaches at a public school, has more problems trying to get Hispanics up to speed than he does with anyone else.

    What other country would tolerate this madness?

    (besides white European countries, I mean)

    What other nation would sabotage the aspirations of its own citizens in favor of aliens?

    http://vdare.com/roberts/for_aliens.htm
    http://vdare.com/roberts/050715_descent.htm
    http://vdare.com/roberts/060826_immigration.htm
    http://vdare.com/roberts/downside.htm

    Both leftists and neocons bear the blame for this.

    The only way to stop this is to stand up, demand accountability from leaders and employers, and refuse to be intimidated by the worn out Marxist word “racist.”

    It’s time to put an end to this madness, one way or another, so that white countries can finally be white countries again.

    And if you think that makes me a white supremacist…too freakin’ bad, because I don’t care. Call me what you want.

    1. Of course, my diatribe was mainly against non-white immigration.

      I also have problems with domestic related racial issues (mainly having to do with blacks), but you already know where I stand there.

    2. I think that populations of White majority countries should have a right to decide their immigration policies. It’s not possible to have a racist immigration policy, really. Your nation is like your home. You don’t have to let anyone in your house. White nations can decide that mostly Whites, or only Whites, or only some type of Whites, or any other type of humans, can come in their countries in whatever numbers and percentages. If Iceland wants to stay White, that’s their business. There ought not to be anything racist about it.

      The main thing is that no one ever puts this mass immigration shit to a vote. We never get to vote on it. Instead it just gets rammed down our throats by White elites, even though majorities are opposed to it.

      Do you call the Chamber of Commerce neocons? Would you not say that the US business and corporate community supports illegal and mass immigration to the hilt?

      1. You’re right, Robert. Although I’m all for diversity, don’t you white people have limits? My all-powerful intuition tells me that, at most, 10% of any given country (especially the European countries) should be immigrants. 15% at most for North America.

      2. Well yes, of course the business sector is also responsible for this problem.

        The people responsible for immigration and the balkanization of America are as follows.

        1. Those actually immigrating. This is pretty obvious, for if they weren’t leaving their shitholes and coming here in the first place, there would be no problem. But I don’t blame them for wanting to move here to better themselves. The real fault lies elsewhere, which leads me to…

        2. The corporate/business sector. Without employers willing to hire cheap immigrant labor, they wouldn’t be coming here. Immigrants, both legal and illegal, come for one reason and one reason only: to work and make money.

        As Paul Craig Roberts points out in his new book on the economy, many corporations and employers openly prefer foreign workers, particularly in professional industries, over native born American workers.

        When you’re told that we need to import Deepak Patel and other foreigners to fill professional jobs because Americans are too stupid and lazy to do them (essentially, because there’s a shortage of qualified Americans), you are hearing a lie.

        So at the root of the problem, greedy businessmen are responsible for our demographic disaster.

        3. Leftist politicians and elites. They want non-white immigrants for future votes, increased political power, etc.

        4. Related to #3, Cultural Marxists also want non-white immigration in order to swell the ranks of non-whites and lend further legitimacy to their arguments.

        After all, I frequently hear anti-racists insist that as the U.S becomes more “of color,” we’ll need to adopt anti-racist strategies and take even more from whites in order to give more to a growing non-white population.

        By reducing whites to a minority and elevating non-whites to a majority, they’re essentially trying to shatter all forms of white interest. I mean, if whites become more and more of a minority, who will care about them? Fuck em!

        Believe me, the anti-racists and Cultural Marxists (who exercise more influence than most people realize) want to reduce white numbers in order to made pro-non-white and anti-white policies and ideas seem more legitimate and necessary.

        And last but not least…

        4. Us white people. We’ve allowed ourselves to be brainwashed and lulled to sleep by Cultural Marxists, the neocon media, lying politicians, and other elites.

        The solution to illegal immigration, neocon wars, the lies of politicians, and the overall deviousness of elites?

        Every white person should be required to read the complete archive of Paul Craig Roberts articles over at VDare. If they did, they would finally wake the fuck up, and the elites wouldn’t know what hit them.

        1. BAG, MacDonald has written that during the first twenty years of the USSR, the Bolsheviks attempted to screw over the majority ethnic Russian population and elevate the more backward groups in the Russian Empire, Kazakhs for example. Of course, then, as now, Jews are at the core of this effort.

    1. With 1.3 billion Chinese, most of which are Han, I don’t think China has anything to worry about by allowing a few million immigrants to spruce-up diversity.

        1. I’m sure America would’ve done something about it a lot earlier, especially in the period of political-incorrectness, if it knew things would turn out this way. As always, the West is always the first to experiment.

        2. Are you serious about Asian guys exploiting the “model minority” image and succeeding with white women? Doesn’t seem much like it here in the States.

        3. I’m a very realistic guy. Any shred of ego I have has been beaten out of me. I have no reason to lie to you; I am telling you as I see it.

      1. China’s main minorities are Tibetans (mongoloid) and Northwest Muslims (mainly of Uighur Turkish ancestry).

        While China isn’t ready to expel them, believe me, the Han Chinese don’t put up with crap from them the way white Americans put up with crap from minorities.

        In fact, it’s interesting. Han Chinese are moving to Western China and Tibet, as opposed to the other way around.

        The Chinese attitude is that they’re bringing jobs, money, and modernization to these regions, and that the minorities should be grateful for being pulled out of backwardness.

        The Northwest Muslims and Tibetans, on the other hand, see Han settlement as an invasion, since the Han are displacing them, diluting their culture, and taking all the good jobs.

        I took a course on China at my university.

        So yes, while China has some diversity, they don’t have anywhere near the same level of racial problems as we do.

        They also don’t have to deal with a hostile and destructive Jewish elite.

        The Chinese people are also nationalistic and proud of their heritage, unlike so many wimpy white people.

        We whites could learn a thing or two from the Chinese and Japanese.

        1. But it would be wrong to view the non-Han mongoloids as immigrants, just as it’s wrong for Americans to see African Americans as immigrants. Both are as part of the their respective regions as the majority are.

          They’re not immigrants.

        2. But it would be wrong to view the non-Han mongoloids as immigrants, just as it’s wrong for Americans to see African Americans as immigrants. Both are as part of the their respective regions as the majority are.

          They’re not immigrants.

          Well, majority groups are not just hostile towards immigrants, but outsiders in general.

          Therefore, even if Northwest Muslims and Tibetans in China, as well as blacks in the U.S are just as part of their respective countries as the majority population, they are still outsiders.

          That’s just a fact, and that’s precisely the problem with diversity. If everyone can be an American, then how is one really an American?

        3. The Chinese people are also nationalistic and proud of their heritage, unlike so many wimpy white people.

          BS BAG. you celebrate your heritage,culture and beauty. It’s just that now you have to share the spotlight and that’s whats really bothering you. Sharing is something men don’t like to do.

        4. They’re only outsiders if they move to Han cities and regions. That I agree with, but that’s only a on micro level. Aren’t we talking on a macro, national level.

        5. BS BAG. you celebrate your heritage,culture and beauty. It’s just that now you have to share the spotlight and that’s whats really bothering you. Sharing is something men don’t like to do.

          I’ve heard that argument millions of times. Many non-whites and anti-racists are always insisting that when whites are worried about being displaced and reduced to a minority, that their fears are illegitimate. They claim that whites simply cannot handle sharing the spotlight and living in an equal society where they are no longer the norm.

          The problem is, I’m not buying that argument. Where and when I came of age (21st century Bay Area) I was the only white person in my social group in high school (why that was I wrote somewhere a while back. I don’t feel like repeating it here), constantly got bombarded with “whites are evil and racist” rhetoric, got messed with by black kids in middle school, etc.

          I’m also being told that one day whites will become a minority, and that we have to embrace that day we lose our power, and to oppose such changes makes us hateful.

          We’re also being told that everyone hates us, and rightfully so, and my sense of logic tells me that when given the opportunity, they’ll exact revenge.

          I know, I know, they’ll insist that such white fears (going back to fear of slave uprisings) have always existed and have always been unfounded.

          But look, I’m not going to sit around and wait for whites to become a powerless minority that will be despised by the new non-white majority.

          I’m not telling you this to appeal to pity or induce tears, not that it would work anyway.

          But I don’t feel like sharing the spotlight. I want what’s best for me and my people, and embracing more diversity and non-white power isn’t it.

          You’re right, I don’t like to share. But then again, who does? Why should I (and whites in general) be an exception?

        6. That’s just a fact, and that’s precisely the problem with diversity. If everyone can be an American, then how is one really an American?

          Then what is your definition of an American? Is being white a requirement of being American?

        7. BAG, I notice in post after you post you keep bringing up your traumatizing experiences as a kid growing up with kids of various races. I’m starting to think that your quasi-white nationalist worldview is like the angry atheist who had his strict Catholic parents beating religion into him. Maybe you are just rebelling.

          For every BAG that said it was terrible to grow up with non-whites, there are many more whites had no such problems. Some of which have good non-white friends and perhaps even married a non-white. I don’t know why this guy’s experience was so bad, but it’s certainly not universal.

        8. Okay, I said I was done for the night, but I’ll respond to Tulio.

          Anything other than Israel or Jews.

          For every BAG that said it was terrible to grow up with non-whites, there are many more whites who had no such problems.

          Well of course. I actually think that my experience isn’t very typical of your average white kid.

          And I’m sure there are many other whites who don’t feel the way I do. Although even just listening to passing conversations in high school, there were white kids who felt like I did.

          Some of which have good non-white friends

          You’re talking about me! In both middle school, high school, and now in college, the majority of my friends were/are non-white (though my closest friends in college right now are white).

          My managers at my university part time job are non-white, my martial arts teachers were non-white, most of my friends and acquaintances were non-white.

          Who knows? Perhaps if you want to go all psychoanalytical on me, you could say that my feelings towards non-whites signify an argumentative marriage.

          Maybe deep, deep down I love them, but there’s a lot of dislike.

          I think my intense feelings regarding race have to do with the fact that I was exposed to it so much.

          Unlike white kids in cocoons in Iowa and Oregon, by the time I was in late middle school and high school, I didn’t have the luxury to not think about race.

          I guess you could say that was one of the forms of “white privilege” that I didn’t get to enjoy.

          I’m starting to think that your quasi-white nationalist worldview is like the angry atheist who had his strict Catholic parents beating religion into him. Maybe you are just rebelling.

          That pretty much nails it.

          In many ways, I am reactionary in the literal sense of the word. I’m reacting to my negative experiences with racial diversity.

          And to clarify, not all, or even most of my experiences with non-whites were awful or traumatic. I’ve also had many positive experiences and even in Oakland, I’ve encountered/observed friendly blacks who do not fit the stereotypes.

          I guess I just had enough negative experiences that they made a mark, particularly my experiences with aggressive black kids in middle school.

  2. Quote :”No, non-whites come to prosperous white countries just so they can ride the gravy train. They don’t have any respect for their host country’s culture, traditions, or anything else. ”

    Come now, where i live , there is a black majority and Europeans are coming in numbers, there are buying all the best beach front properties , they are even renaming places, i hate to go to those places and hear only german being spoken or some other northern european language, i like being part of the original colonials, i don’t want things to change, stay the F**k away from my home.

  3. Sounds like a touch of Xenophobia to me

    Over the long term
    We are all African
    Shores of Lake Victoria was the cradle of Humanity.

    1. Sounds like a touch of Xenophobia to me

      Too bad, so sad. If xenophobia is what it takes to end this problem, then so be it.

      Over the long term
      We are all African

      Yawn.

      I think Sam Francis had a great retort to such a cliche: “That’s like saying that we’re all fish because once upon a time we all originally came from the ocean.”

    2. Hmmm , you think ! , i guess some of those European countries are just xenophobic also, but don’t worry they’ll get over it , after all, whites are very progressive.

  4. The irony is that whites are the race most dispersed around the planet due to them taking over the lands of OTHER races. When has Africa ever been for Africans and Latin America for Latinos? Why are this white Miss Namibias and white presidents of nearly every Latin Am nation? Why are young Thai and Filipino women being sold into sex slavery to service the needs of balding white men on sex tours?

    1. Africa is for Africans. Almost everyone who lives in Sub Saharan Africa is a Black person. It’s not being flooded with non-Black immigrants to dilute and erase its Black people and cultures.

      Latin America is for Latins. Latin America is not being flooded with non-Latins who will wipe out its Latin American culture. Can you show me any Latin countries that are being drowned in non-Latin immigrants.

      Show me one non-White country that is having its genes and culture drowned out by a flood of Euro White immigrants. Show me one.

      The only countries that are being drowned in immigrants of a different race and culture than the majority are White countries!

      Think about it.

      1. Almost everyone who lives in Sub Saharan Africa is a Black person, but almost all the resources in Sub Saharan Africa are owned by multinational corporations or foreign countries, including non-white ones like China and Saudi Arabia. The multi-ethnic plutocrats aren’t settling there now, they’re just robbing the joint. Of course the guilt for the ongoing rape of Africa gets pinned on all white people, even though it’s mostly the multi-ethnic ruling class who are benefiting from it.

        The American plutocrats and their liberal lackeys frame open borders as a way to make it up to third worlders who have been screwed by globalism, but of course it’s only on the native-born working class to foot the bill.

        “The only countries that are being drowned in immigrants of a different race and culture than the majority are White countries!”

        There are a lot of Asian immigrants who have taken over the culture of other Asian areas. The Chinese, obviously. Aren’t the Japanese the dominant group in Hawaii? Because they’re all of the same race, they don’t get the attention that white settlers do.

        It’s interesting that the Critical Race Theory set doesn’t address these “settlers” or non-white imperialism. I saw a Tim Wise speech where he made the ridiculous statement that the US invaded Iraq not in the the interest of capitalism, but solely in the interest of white supremacy! It’s a nice way to dodge class altogether.

      2. Why do we only consider it a “drowning out” if it’s whites coming into non-white countries. Maybe this white vs. non-white dichotomy is a phony construct. In reality there is no such thing. Grouping non-whites together makes about as much sense as grouping Asians and whites together and calling them “non-blacks” as if that means anything.

        Now as for “non-white” nations that are being flooded by foreigners, of course they exist. Sometimes the foreigners are white, sometimes they are not. For example, you have lots of whites from the U.S. and Canada flooding into Panama and buying up retirement property. The government is even encouraging it. It’s been happening in Costa Rica even longer. Indians have been living in African countries for a long time, and now Chinese are starting to come in. Dubai has been massively flooded with immigrants from Asia. Brazil has some of the largest Asian populations in the New World and a lot of Lebanese as well.

        This “flooding” has always gone on. Taiwan used to be Pacific Islander until the Han Chinese flooded in and took it over. And whites have flooded non-white countries for centuries. Jews flooded Palestine. Chinese flooded Tibet. Indians flooded Uganda. What WNs refer to as the flooding of white nations is just Europe now experiencing what’s been going on everywhere else all along.

        There’s no orchestrated effort to destroy the white genotype. These conspiracies are funny. Look, we are becoming a smaller world by the day. I banter with friends in Chile(who moved there from Venezuela and btw the guy is indigenous looking like Chavez married to a white Venezuelan girl) and Japan(a black dude who is married to a Japanese woman and living in Tokyo how is that for some internationalism) through facebook more than I do my own neighbors that live next door to me. This is the way the world is going. You can lament it, but you know what, in the distant future, there won’t be any races. We’ll all look like mixed Brazilians. Some view that as dystopia, some welcome it, some are indifferent to it, but it’s inevitable. Take a guy like Tiger Woods. Part Thai, part black, part white, part AmerIndian, he marries a Swedish girl. Sorry guys, that’s the future of the planet right there. Get used to it. We started out as one race in Africa, and we’ll eventually end up as one race again like long lost relatives having a reunion.

        1. There are zero, zero, zero non-White countries that are being drowned out genetically and culturally by alien invasions.

          Your examples are phony. A few Americans move to Costa Rica and Panama. So what? There are already Whites in those lands. Costa Rica is 73% White already. How is a few US Whites moving to Costa Rica changing the face of the nation, since Costa Rica is a White country? Are a few White Panamanians changing the face of the nation culturally and genetically? No.

          Taiwan used to be Pacific Islander until the Han Chinese flooded in and took it over. And whites have flooded non-white countries for centuries. Jews flooded Palestine. Chinese flooded Tibet.

          I see you are supporting imperialism, settler-colonialism and ethnic cleansing now. Charming!

          Brazil has some of the largest Asian populations in the New World and a lot of Lebanese as well.

          That’s ridiculous. The % of Asians in Brazil is not even 1%. There are few Arabs there.

          Indians have been living in African countries for a long time, and now Chinese are starting to come in.

          Show me one single African country that got so flooded with Indian immigrants that they flooded out the African nature of the land culturally and genetically.

          Dubai has been massively flooded with immigrants from Asia.

          Yes but they are not allowed to become citizens, so their presence there is simply irrelevant.

          Now as for “non-white” nations that are being flooded by foreigners, of course they exist.

          Name one where a similar process as in White countries is going on. Name one. One. One.

          Indians flooded Uganda.

          Right tulio. At independence, they were 1% of the population. Now their numbers have plummeted by 80%. Boy they flooded that place something awful dude!

          Why are there no clamors to flood the Arabian states, Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan with racially and culturally alien immigrants? This is only demanded of White countries.

          Only White countries need diversity! Why is that? It’s worse than that. Did you know that heavily White cities, towns and counties need diversity too? Why is that. How come Black regions don’t need diversity too? How come Hispanic regions don’t need diversity?

          Why is it only White regions, populaces and states are in need of this shot of diversity poison?

          You can’t answer that, can you?

        2. There are zero, zero, zero non-White countries that are being drowned out genetically and culturally by alien invasions.

          Really? What about the land we’re standing on? Native Americans are now 1% of the population. They used to be 100%. What about Aboriginees, what about Maoris? What about whites that took over over Native American land in S. America and wiped out the indigenous culture? Everything you describe above already happened in the Americas.

          And why did you ignore my example of Jews and Palestine?

        3. There are zero, zero, zero non-White countries that are being drowned out genetically and culturally by alien invasions.

          Really? What about the land we’re standing on? Native Americans are now 1% of the population. They used to be 100%. What about Aboriginees, what about Maoris? What about whites that took over over Native American land in S. America and wiped out the indigenous culture? Everything you describe above already happened in the Americas.

          And why did you ignore my example of Jews and Palestine?

          It’s notable that you point out that the current mass immigration to White lands is similar to the repulsive settler-colonialism, imperialism and fascism that Whites used to engage in. The Jews continue to engage in this sort of White behavior in Palestine, but this is why they are being so rejected by Whites the world over. The White world has turned its back on settler-colonialism and the fascism that goes along with it.

          Non-Whites are more backwards than Whites, so they continue to engage in this repulsive shit. West Turkestan, Irian Jaya, Tibet, North Kurdistan, Spanish Sahara, Myanmar and Aceh.

          I’m not exactly sure what your point is. Yes, Whites used to invade in some horrible settler-colonialism and the fascism and imperialism that always goes along with it. These were the darkest days of the Whites. That’s mostly over now, and Whites reject it as uncivilized and backwards.

          I’m not sure what your point is. Whites used to be backwards, uncivilized settler-colonial fascist shits, therefore, everyone else gets to do it back to us forever more?

          Please note that you are comparing mass immigration to White lands with White settler-colonialism and the fascism and imperialism that went along with that. It is NOT a flattering comparison.

          What about whites that took over over Native American land in S. America and wiped out the indigenous culture?

          This only happened in a few cases. Mostly they just massively interbred with the Amerindians and created a new group of people who are mestizos or White-Amerindian mixes. Mestizo culture is a combination of White and Amerindian.

          Anyway, this was long ago.

        4. Maybe this white vs. non-white dichotomy is a phony construct. In reality there is no such thing. Grouping non-whites together makes about as much sense as grouping Asians and whites together and calling them “non-blacks” as if that means anything.

          That’s a good point. What term should we use then?

          Of course, anti-racists use “people of color,” which is really just “non-white” framed in a more positive, political, we’re going to unite and take down the white man fashion.

          I guess I should just take the time and recognize each different race, rather than just lumping them together as non-white.

          This is the way the world is going. You can lament it, but you know what, in the distant future, there won’t be any races.

          Yeah, well I lament it. I want there to be people who look like me and my ancestors in the future.

          And yeah, I know people will say that due to the way genetics works, you’ll always have white looking people even if they are mixed.

          But still, all this mania over biracials screws American whites. Now that leftists and blacks themselves are the biggest supporters of the One Drop Rule, any mulatto such as Barack Obama or Halle Barry is black.

          Essentially, black numbers increase through interracial marriage while white numbers decrease.

          Although I realize that the One Drop Rule was only strictly to blacks, and not other races such as Indians or Asians.

          (by the way, I think the ODR is BS, and find it foolish the way blacks push it in order to claim Cleopatra as “black,” which is based on frivolous evidence anyway, but I digress).

          I don’t exactly think that the billions of people in Asia or Africa will be involved in this interracial fucking process the same way that people in the west will.

          So really, this mixed race future is just going to be a Latin American and white (both American, European, Canadian, and Australian) affair, which I don’t like.

          I’m for my people, and I want them to exist in the future.

        5. My Robert is that mass migrations of one race displacing another race has always been happening. For much of the last 500 years it was whites displacing non-whites off their land. The resources of the Americas, Africa and Asia were used to make Europe wealthy and give it a big economic boost above others. Now these white countries are the wealthiest so it attracts economic refugees.

          These Indians moving to England aren’t moving there because they want to. Think about it, who wants to move to the other side of the planet where they are going to basically be aliens? They’re simply going out of economic necessity. Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled. It’s just push-pull economics. Not some grandiose “non-white” conspiracy to eradicate the white genotype. If Europe was poor and China was rich, you’d see whites going to China looking for jobs. People follow the money, it’s just that simple.

        6. “I don’t exactly think that the billions of people in Asia or Africa will be involved in this interracial fucking process the same way that people in the west will. ”

          I did say that the human race will be pretty much mixed in the distant future. I don’t think we’ll all be mixed anytime soon. First off, most people don’t have the desire to marry out of their group, and secondly, most people live around and socialize with people like them.

          However the world is becoming smaller and more interconnected and you will see more migrations in the future. Like for example, my black buddy(and Muslim at that) now living in Tokyo with his(recently converted to Islam) Japanese wife. I’m friends with an E. Indian woman who is now engaged to be married to a German guy who moved to Los Angeles for business reasons. Another buddy of mine is a Ukrainian guy who now speaks Spanish because his girlfriend from Mexico taught him, oh and this girlfriend from Mexico is Chinese! One of my best friends is white guy who is half Anglo and half El Salvadorean, though his Salvy mother is very white looking. He is now married to a mestiza Salvadorena. Her sister is married to a Chinese guy. One of their friends is a Latino guy with a Chinese wife. etc etc. That’s the kind of shit I’m talking about. I know numerically these guys are still oddballs and 99% of humanity marries within their race, but I really do think that this is the future of the world.

  5. So, what can you do?

    I really doubt my Numbers USA faxes have had much effect.

    In fact, I’m beginning to accept the fact that “diversity is the future”. It won’t be all that bad. I look around at kids and see all colors playing together like never before. Sure, the multiculturalist philosophy has infiltrated our schools and brought a great deal of mediocrity, but without the myth of racial equality, wouldn’t there just be continuous conflict? It seems necessary at this point, especially in CA where over half our population is non-white. I mean, you can’t tell 12 yr old that certain ones of them have higher IQs. And I’m not about to start deporting people en mass. I’d just like to see a drastic decrease in immigration, and mostly for population stabilization and not white preservation.

    Sure, the average might go down a little bit but I never had much in common with the average and there will still be smart people here and there. Might be a little bit rarer, but oh well. We don’t breed. It’s our fault. It’s not like they’re doing anything wrong by being dumb. They can still be moral, helpful people, so long as they’re educated. I mainly fear that the tribe will take over and all smart people will be taken out of positions of power due to excessive affirmative action in govt. Now that would be a disaster. As long as we have wise leadership we can get by. Human history is just getting by anyway. There’s always new problems.

    Also, white American culture has shot itself in the foot because it readily has given up its culture and heritage for the sake of materialism and money. It’s not like people are listening to Bach and Beethoven and discussing Schopenhauer and Descartes in these little all-white towns. They might be quainter and cleaner than New York, but they tend to be culturally bankrupt and prefer it that way. Urbanity is hypocritical but it offers you a wider view of life.

    This is probably just a typical liberal argument. Suffice it to say I still get pissed off driving through Oakland, Stockton, Richmond . . . (I could go on) and any other urban hellhole brought about by stupid, unrealistic policy.

  6. So, what can you do?

    I really doubt my Numbers USA faxes have had much effect.

    In fact, I’m beginning to accept the fact that “diversity is the future”. It won’t be all that bad. I look around at kids and see all colors playing together like never before. Sure, the multiculturalist philosophy has infiltrated our schools and brought a great deal of mediocrity, but without the myth of racial equality, wouldn’t there just be continuous conflict? It seems necessary at this point, especially in CA where over half our population is non-white. I mean, you can’t tell 12 yr old that certain ones of them have higher IQs. And I’m not about to start deporting people en mass. I’d just like to see a drastic decrease in immigration, and mostly for population stabilization and not white preservation.

    Sure, the average might go down a little bit but I never had much in common with the average and there will still be smart people here and there. Might be a little bit rarer, but oh well. We don’t breed. It’s our fault. It’s not like they’re doing anything wrong by being dumb. They can still be moral, helpful people, so long as they’re educated. I mainly fear that the tribe will take over and all smart people will be taken out of positions of power due to excessive affirmative action in govt. Now that would be a disaster. As long as we have wise leadership we can get by. Human history is just getting by anyway. There’s always new problems.

    Also, white American culture has shot itself in the foot because it readily has given up its culture and heritage for the sake of materialism and money. It’s not like people are listening to Bach and Beethoven and discussing Schopenhauer and Descartes in these little all-white towns. They might be quainter and cleaner than New York, but they tend to be culturally bankrupt and prefer it that way. Urbanity is hypocritical but it offers you a wider view of life.

    This is probably just a typical liberal argument. Suffice it to say I still get pissed off driving through Oakland, Stockton, Richmond . . . (I could go on) and any other urban hellhole brought about by stupid, unrealistic policy.

  7. I also wonder if by leaving and avoiding the other races in their own countries whites aren’t just creating a larger problem. People come in to your inner city, you leave, cut off resources, leave them to “their own devices” — i.e. foreign culture as opposed to assimilation — and you just shove some welfare money in their face. This all leads to huge birthrates, lack of entrepreneurship, lack of integration, proliferation of poverty, extension of servile state, heightened racial tensions, etc. Honestly, living in a city with 10% minorities would be fine. It’s just when whites get to skittish (which when it comes to having children makes a certain amount of sense) they just abandon ship and create a huge mess. It’s like Palo Alto cutting off its East half . . . and you expected to solve the problem that way? You can’t just shove them back and forget about them. You’re just going to create a bigger problem in the future when there’s more of them and they’re eventually empowered. Shoving money at them does nothing. And with immigration, a lot of it has to do with our stupid imperialism. Whenever we go fight a war, whenever we spread our culture abroad, they come. Look at Samoa. Philippines. Vietnam. And I’m sure they’ll be a good number of Afghan and Iraqi immigrants soon.

  8. “And with immigration, a lot of it has to do with our stupid imperialism. Whenever we go fight a war, whenever we spread our culture abroad, they come.”

    I agree with you. I like living in mixed neighborhoods. I’m not worried about “white” culture, I just don’t like being used as a pawn in the bourgeois power struggle.

    Imperialism, and the inevitable influx of refugees who provide dirt cheap labor for TPTB is a feature of capitalism, not a bug.

    Racism is a problem, but it wouldn’t be nearly the problem it is without TPTB using it to pit various groups against each other. The inability of the bourgeois liberals on the so-called left to admit this is what frosts me. I have to conclude that racial conflict is good business for them.

  9. A lot of non-Whites know what it’s like to have their lands taken over by racial outsiders. So it’s not as if non-Whites can’t relate to what Whites are saying about their lands being “taken over.”

    But I don’t think many non-Whites are going to be open to the idea that what was OK for Whites – acting in their self-interest – is suddenly not going to be OK for them.

    I’m not saying it’s a great attitude, but I think it’s just the way people are.

    1. I guess it all depends on what one’s view of an “ultimate” goal is.

      Do we live in the past, or subscribe to an enlightened future. One is based on emotion, and the other on progress.

      In the end, all those folks who participated in all these grievances, are long since dead…Well, minus the Bush administration. They will be around for a while.

    2. I can see that, but in that case, they can’t really expect to present the idea that what was acceptable for Whites is still not acceptable for Whites. That’s just the way people are!

  10. Quote : ” Please note that you are comparing mass immigration to White lands with White settler-colonialism and the fascism and imperialism that went along with that. It is NOT a flattering comparison.”

    Oh so by distancing European settler-colonialism from mass immigration ,White Americans are trying to say that they are victims of a never before seen horrendous act upon a group of people ? the methods maybe different but the end results has always been observed throughout human history.

      1. Of course , but except for the methods, the results are almost the same one group replacing another it doesn’t matter weather it is european imperialism or immigration.

  11. It’s there loss! What about those annoying (and often poor) Irish and Eastern European immigrants? Now they are white. Their extra diversity (cultural, genetic, etc), along with their stronger work ethic, buoyed our country up. This is why we are among the best in terms of science and technology DESPITE our evangelical right-wing insanity. History is repeating itself, this time from all over the world. People from Arabia to Zambia are choosing here instead of Japan, Korea, and to a lesser extent Europe. After the religious-right decays we could well succeed enough to leave even the best of East Asia behind. Keep all those foreign Ph.D students here, they are what we need!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *