The White Race Traitor Left in the US

A reasonable progressive commenter from the UK, the brilliant and reincarnated Abiezer Coppe, is stunned by the insanity of the US Left, as exemplified in the Red Flag for White Bulls post:

More weirdness from the US of A. How anyone can take this stuff seriously! Is Race Traitor aligned with any…uh…social movement as we understand it? Or is it highly marginal like White nationalism?

I am not sure how big this movement really is in US culture. It seems a lot bigger than it is because it is so huge in academia and on the Left. But most Americans laugh at academia and the Left. You won’t find much of this talk in the mainstream US press, though it is starting to gain followers among anti-racist Blacks (like here), Hispanics and Asians (most of whom simply have a racial grudge against Whites, and are not really progressive in any other way). You’ll never see views like this in the US mainstream media, not yet anyway.

But! The entire Western Left is into this crap! Retarded or what? As a logical consequence, I have known White Leftist workers who despise the US Left as anti-White and “only cares about the Blacks and the Mexicans.” I joined the Communist Party USA a while back and told them about a friend who was also a Communist. The CPUSA very much wanted to give him a membership, but when I asked him, he refused to be associated with them, as he saw them as “anti-White worker.”

The Left in the US is simply insane, and they have completely blown off (and blown it with) the US White working class.

Also there is a large but not really Left* “Cultural Marxist” movement in the US which buys into this nonsense. A lot of them are not Left at all on economics, instead they are moneyed bourgeois, Blacks, Hispanics or even Whites (often Jewish), who promote this anti-White crap for a variety of reasons. The Black and Hispanic bourgeois, while rightwing and pro-elite on economic matters, wants to stick it to Whitey for racial reasons. I should make alliances with these rightwingers why now?

There are sectors of the White “Left” in the US now that have abandoned economics altogether. The article above exemplifies the only way that they are “Left” at all anymore. Stick it to Whitey Left. They combine the nutty anti-racism above with, of all things, neoliberal economics! They support multiculturalism, fuck-Whitey anti-racism, worship of everything non-White, Open Borders in White countries, and neoliberal economics! What that is called, I don’t know. Smells like Shit Stew!

In some ways, they are a faction of the “rootless cosmopolitan” internationalist pro-multinational corporation neoliberal elite which is loyal to no land and knows no borders. This is the Screw Whitey “progressive” branch of that elite. They share with the rest the neoliberal economics, the support for Open Borders in White lands and the support for multiculturalism (really multinational corporate McWorld).

*Commenter (and great writer) Lafayette Sennacherib says these folks are not Left since they are rightwing on economics. As he notes, when you take economics out of the Left, nothing remains. You’re not on the Left anymore. I concur, and Saint Karl in Heaven surely agrees. Therefore, this weird Cultural Marxist-neoliberalism stuff is not any kind of Left politics at all. What it is, and whether it is liberal, Centrist or Right, I have no idea.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

78 thoughts on “The White Race Traitor Left in the US”

  1. Robert, how do Asians have a racial grudge against whites, and why are we not progressive in any other way? I bet you the Chinese wouldn’t accept a plutocratic kike elite like white Americans seem to.
    This neoliberal economics mixed with Cultural Marxism is essentially Jewish politics. “Rootless cosmopolitans?”, you might as well say hebes.

    1. Believe me anon, there are many things I admire about the Chinese.

      -Their strong sense of pride and nationalism.

      -The fact that they don’t take crap from minorities.

      -Their sense of discipline and unity.

      etc.

      But yes, Asians would never tolerate a hostile Jewish elite.

      The reason why Jews can remain undetected in white countries is because they look white, and thus can blend in.

      That way, they can identify as white in front of white people, but also retain their hostile Jewish identity behind the scenes.

      What our Jewish friends must realize is that when whites are reduced to a minority, in part because of their efforts, they will no longer be able to blend in.

      You average white Joe may not notice devious and sleazy Jews, but their (ie. Jews) precious “people of color” will.

      Why they continue to try to undermine a guilt-ridden white majority is beyond me.

      Once blacks and browns take over, they’re not going to be any nicer to Jews, and in fact will probably deal with them more harshly, because they can at least recognize Jews as outsiders on account of their appearance.

      And I bet that if blacks and browns unite together in some “people of color” coalition and become a large majority, Jews will then encourage white immigration.

      Why?

      Because they don’t want to live in a society where there’s a large and dominant majority. They want a state with various divided minority groups (which will be the case in 2050, if nothing changes) so that their status will be safe.

      In homogenous countries (such as those in Asia) they would be easier to detect and root out.

      The day Jews start advocating a liberal Israeli immigration policy is the day I start believing that they are truly the wonderful paragons of tolerance and righteousness that they claim they are.

      Otherwise, they just promote pro-immigrant, pro-black causes out of their own interests.

      1. You’re 100% spot on. I think the reason why they try to undermine the white majority is because of the potential for a populist, anti-Jewish white figure to rise out of nowhere, just like Germans were not really anti-Jewish until AFTER World War I and the Jewish betrayal of Germany after they got Palestine from the Balfour Declaration. Of course Herr Hitler, rose out of nowhere and took a previously Jewish-friendly country down the opposite path.

      2. By the way, whites are pretty stupid for not being able to detect Jews. I’m Asian and I can still distinguish white Gentiles from Jews, it’s not that hard. Why someone can’t tell the difference between a light-haired, light-skinned, light-eyed person from a olive-skinned, jet black curly-haired, hook-nosed, bulging beady-eyed one is beyond me. Hell they’re essentially “Arabs in denial”.

        1. Actually, many Jews do look white.

          One of my TA’s in college was a blond-haired, blue eyed white woman whose last name was Cooper. But she turned out to be Jewish.

          Many Jews change their names and try to make themselves look more anglo.

          Of course, some Jews, such as Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod, and those with names such as Steinberg, and even the “amazing racist” comedian Ari Shaffir are blatantly Jewish.

          Still, others are harder to detect.

          Also, since I grew up in the multiracial Bay Area (there are white enclaves in the Bay, just FYI, but I spent very little time around them), I’m more used to distinguishing between whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Middle Easterners, Pacific Islanders, etc.

          I never really developed an ability to detect Jews.

          Most Jews I know are not olive-skinned, but have a skin tone very similar to whites.

          The best way to detect them is to look at their hair and their surnames. Curly Jew fro hair and surnames such as Steinberg or Feinstein help.

        2. The ones I’ve seen in New York looked pretty Mediterranean, not necessarily Arab, but more like Greek or Armenian, and both nationalities are very exotic and different looking from the perspective of a northwestern European.

    2. There are leftwing, Cultural Marxist Asians in the US who have set up White-bashing websites spouting Tim Wise and all the rest. Their rhetoric is right out of Race Traitor. They are run by young Asian men in the US who are not getting any women because the Asian women are rejecting them in favor in Whites, and White women don’t want them. They are not interested in Black or Hispanic women. Th sites are all bashing traitorous US Asian women going for White men in droves.

      Also a lot of stuff about how macho Asian guys are – lots of photos of Asian sports stars and posts about badass Asian warriors in the past. And stuff about Asian guys getting hot White chicks in the US. Lot of media-bashing posts too, but they call it the White media and not the Jewish media. They sort of sound like you except for the Cultural Marxism and the White-bashing. I am referring to these folks.

      The neoliberal economics is now the politics of the entire elite of the world and not just the US. They are not all Jews in the US or the world. It’s also the politics of the upper middle class in the US. It’s crazy to call it Jewish economics. “We are all Jews now.” The entire elite is essentially “Jewified.” You get rid of the Jews and now you have to get rid of 36 million Jewified Gentiles in the US and way more elsewhere. Good luck!

      1. Those Asians are naive to not see the kike behind the scenes, and would you like if hordes of white women were being taken by men of another race?

        1. Not that many White chicks are marrying out.

          Fully 35% of Asian females are marrying out. That sucks for White guys. We White guys can see it. Or at least I can. Asian chicks have the hots for us. Why? I have some ideas, but I’m not certain.

        2. Thing I don’t get is, it’s not as if Asians, are a low-income, socioeconomically backward people, at least NE Asians, so why the fuck do the gook bitches marry out?

        3. I have some theories about that. I think it’s basic biology maybe combined with some sociology.

          What’s weird is it’s a mirror image of White women going for Black guys. In a lot of those relationships, the White woman has $ and the Black guy doesn’t or often he is just a bum living off the White chick. They’re often abusive to the White women in one way or another too. We White men treat White women way better than these Black guys do. But still they pick them over us anyway a lot of times.

          Similar with Asian women and White guys. Sub Asian for White and White for Black and you have the White woman – Black guy thing. The Asian women often have $, and the White guy is often an unemployed bum. He lives off the Asian chick and treats is abusive to her in various ways. Asian guys have $ and they won’t abuse these women like that, but they still pick these White dicks over nice Asian guys.

        4. Yeah but there’s no epidemic of black guy/white woman couples like it is with white guy/asian woman couples. And those gook whores deserve whatever beating or abuse they get from the white trash they chose to marry.

        5. The standard HBD theory is (paraphrasing):

          Asian guys are super providers. They’re selected to be providers over seducers (and possibly over being social dominators who provide by appropriating other people’s income or organising them).

          So conjecturing to put this with the mating market, it seems like there may be a diminishing return on being a provider over personality (seducer) traits that disadvantages Asian guys in US society or (possibly as well).

          Also I think Asian guys might have a social trend of spending their greater income (which they could use to seduce women) on sensible family stuff or geeky hyperstimulating stuff (otaku/techy stuff) over conspicuous consumption that gets women (conspicuous consumption of stuff that women like – fashion, expensive restaurants, &c. – is how to transform provider skills into seducer skills), whereas White guys might not be such “cheap dates” relative to their income (or at least relative to their seduction skills). I think US society tends to look down on conspicuous consumption relatively more than Asian society, as well.

        6. Asians are the most physically unattractive race of all races, there have been surveys proving that entire point. I would say they are also the bottom of the barrel in terms of looks as well and are universally unattractive wherever you go besides Asia.

      2. There are leftwing, Cultural Marxist Asians in the US who have set up White-bashing websites spouting Tim Wise and all the rest.

        There are some, but very few. Also, as someone who’s read blogs such as Angry Asian Man, I can tell you that they don’t really bash whites all that much.

        Oh sure, they complain about films such as “The Last Airbender,” how Asian guys don’t get laid in films, the “perpetual foreigner” syndrome, and are pro-immigrant/pro-diversity, etc, etc.

        Many of them also approve of the Tim Wise types.

        But relative to anti-racist black bloggers, they are far more calm, reasonable, and don’t seem to hate whites.

        Angry Asian Man really isn’t that angry.

        I’m sure there are other Asian blogs that bash whites, but unlike black bloggers, your average Asian blogger is pretty mild.

  2. Also, unhindered by white guilt over the holocaust, blacks and browns won’t have any problem with calling Jews out.

  3. ‘The CPUSA very much wanted to give him a membership, but when I asked him, he refused to be associated with them, as he saw them as “anti-White worker”.’

    They need to look at that. That’s their core membership. When the CPUSA was founded, they had over 60,000 members. Ninety years later, it’s less than a quarter of that…in a nation of 300 million people…doesn’t anyone take stock? Duh…communism was meant to be popular….with the white working class first and foremost, not with trannies, gays and dicksuckers, marginal trailer trash and lumpen elements, lesbianadom and LGBT Berkeley students. I’ve nothing against these people – where’s my UZI by the way? – but it ain’t the core constituency!

    It’s as bad as these Western Maoists who behave the Weather Underground and boycott elections!

    The Green Party is making a lot of headway in my home city, especially on poor working class estates, what you call housing projects – they are now the second biggest party after Labour – because they have sensible socialist policies by and large, they act on what they say they’ll do, so they’ve got people’s trust, and they have absolutely nothing to do with the loony tunes LEFT. It’s no wonder ex Communists find themselves in the Green Left, because it barely behaves like the traditional Left, with its cabals, coded language and classism, but it does (in part) what the Left set out to do…

    I just hope they don’t go the way of the German, Dutch and Irish Greens, lured by a taste of power into neoliberal coalitions…la tentation réformiste!

  4. Not even reformism…that would be ok…all we’ve ever wrung from the deep pockets of the ruling class was by way of reformism, but class collaboration with the, that’s the route the German Greens went down. At least that’s what I understand…should’ve learned German instead of two Romance languages.

  5. Sorry I lost it a bit. I think the Left should defend racial and sexual minorities against discrimination, but discreetly…it shouldn’t be the raison d’etre.

    There was a telling moment in the British General Election campaign. A white working class woman, a lifelong Labour voter, asked Prime Minister Gordon Brown on the campaign trail about immigration. We have open borders with 26 other European Union countries – that’s an area nearly as big as the US, and a population bigger than the US – when it includes the Ukraine and Turkey (both countries bigger than France, it’ll be bigger than the US. Gordon mumbled something about all the British people who emigrate and live in Europe, dodging the question, and then called her a bigot behind her back, when the microphone was still on…He did not address her insecurities!

    Her question as I understand it was in essence…what about the white English born working class? What about us? She probably wasn’t thinking of Asians at all, but of other European whites who are still pouring into the country. She was thinking of Poles, more than 800,000 of them in the last few years, she was thinking of Albanians and Serbs and other refugees from the wrecked economies of the post Communist neoliberal experiment, the Baltic states, Romania…all these extra people on our overcrowded island put pressure on public housing, on the health service, on education…and in many cases the ex Communist countries lose their best and brightest, those with initiative, and their young to our unreliable climate and our post imperial little England Weltanschauung, our declining and casualised economy and its shrinking manufacturing base…

      1. Don’t know anything about them. We get a lot of Russians here too! Russia’s another economy that’s gone tits up since the fall of Communism.
        Hungary has done better – they’ve had left governments. Every time I travel on public transport, I hear Russian and Polish being spoken. I see Polish newspapers in the kiosks. I see Polish delis opening everywhere. Don’t get me wrong. I like Poles. But this open borders policy is robbing Poland of its future!

    1. I think she probably was thinking of non-European immigration, at least to some extent, to be honest. I think a lot of British (ethnically and otherwise) people in the UK use the Poles as a proxy for talking about non-European immigration, because they don’t want to be seen as racist, so focusing on an immigrant group where the difference with the majority is perceived to be more cultural than explainable by biology seems like a good way to present your argument.

      The problem with them doing this is that this is a terrible idea as the recent Eastern European migration to the UK isn’t the same and doesn’t just drive down local wages in unskilled jobs that anyone can do (but supposedly won’t do), but tends more to provides specific skills and make new jobs. They’re also not a net drain on the treasury (although to be fair, everyone else in UK is and immigrants just are more so – there’s no “self sufficiency” for anyone). But by then the stats on the Poles are pulled out and everyone is fooled into thinking that this is generally the case for all migration.

  6. Quote : What our Jewish friends must realize is that when whites are reduced to a minority.

    You guys think that some big brown wave is gonna easily come crashing in and wipe away all those fine white picket fences.
    Robert in one your older blogs you said that wherever whites go the Blacks and Browns follow, so they wanna be close to whites not just physically close but culturally as well, they crave acceptance.
    Listen, Blacks and browns they are inter marrying with whites alot and most likely their children will have also have white partners and also most these kids are grown up culturally white . I don’t believe the Blacks and Browns want to do away white culture, most of the i hate whitey stuff is non acceptance angst. That’s the whole reason for the White guy/asian girl pairing, the image of whiteness is strong so they wanna have beautiful half white babies, it brings them closer to white. I think Robert a while back talked about Rashida Jones daughter of Music Producer Quincy Jones whom you said was 35 percent black ,yet just look how she looks, real Caucasian like.
    Their will be absorption yeah, and a”Transition” but who says it’s gonna be white into brown.

    1. most of the i hate whitey stuff is non acceptance angst.

      That certainly can be debated, but I can agree with that to a certain extent.

      You frequently hear black activist types always complaining about how white peoples’ hearts never changed. Or they rail about how white suburbs don’t have enough black people living in them. Or the unwillingness of whites to truly accept blacks as equals.

      That does show that these anti-racist blacks do crave white acceptance, no matter how defiant they are or how unwilling they are to admit it.

      However, I’m not too thrilled by the idea that while non-whites may hate us, they don’t hate our culture, and just want to be accepted.

      I would rather have white people stick around than have them be displaced and have their culture carried on by blacks and Hispanics.

      1. There’s two types of Negro activist types. The first is the integrationist type. The second is the more nationalist, Malcolm X, “we want to separate” kind. The second type I can respect, the first are scum. All they want is to fuck white women and forever live off the white man that they claim to despise.

        1. I too admire the Malcolm X types.

          I like black nationalists and separatists.

          They’re not asking white people to let them live in their neighborhoods, attend their schools, marry their daughters, etc.

          They just want to be left the hell alone and enjoy self-determination.

          I respect that.

          The integrationist types who constantly whine about how wicked white people are and yet lament the fact that white suburbs don’t have enough blacks are pathetic.

          It’s like the abused child who hates his abusive stepfather, but constantly craves his acceptance and charity.

          The child who breaks away from his abusive stepfather and creates his own independent sphere is worthy of respect.

          What blacks need to learn is that respect comes from power and independence, not begging. Respect doesn’t come from demanding acceptance from those you despise. Respect doesn’t come from demanding to live in the same neighborhood and attend the same school as your oppressor.

          By the way, American Indians took the “we want to be separate,” nationalist route. They don’t want to live in the white man’s neighborhoods, attend his schools, or earn his acceptance.

          When asked by a white congressman what Indians want, Alex Chasing Hawk replied, “a federal leave-us-alone law!”

          And you know what? Indians enjoy more respect than blacks.

          Oh sure, there’s the demeaning mascot and casino jokes.

          However, you will never find whites advertising whatever black ancestry they might have, let alone making up black ancestry.

          Heck, many whites are proud to point out that one Indian ancestor they have.

          Bottom line is this: respect comes from self-determination and independence, not begging your enemy for acceptance.

        2. I guess this also applies to the kosher conservative whites who constantly kiss the asses of their kike masters.”Oh yeah, go Israel! Let’s bomb Iran! More bailouts for greedy kike scum!”

        3. I guess this also applies to the kosher conservative whites who constantly kiss the asses of their kike masters.”Oh yeah, go Israel! Let’s bomb Iran! More bailouts for greedy kike scum!”

          Good point.

          I hate the way many white conservatives go along with neocon scum and kiss Jewish ass.

          The late, well paid combat T.V talk show host Wally George (who was based in Orange County, by the way) invited guests such as Irv Rubin (founder of the militant Jewish Defense League) onto his show and attacked critics of Israel as “Dirty Jew Haters.”

          He’s the classic example of the white conservative who goes along with screaming “anti-semitism” and supporting their agenda.

          I cannot think of a single mainstream white conservative who doesn’t worship Israel.

          It’s pathetic, really.

        4. If Hitler could see from his grave what passes for the “right” here in America, he’d be laughing his teeth out. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, what cowardly shitwads! I love how the kikes are allowed to have violent, nationalist organizations like the JDL, but Gentiles can’t.

        5. If Hitler could see from his grave what passes for the “right” here in America, he’d be laughing his teeth out

          Hmmm.

          Asian anon, I agree with a good amount of what you say and you make some good points, but that kinda disturbed me.

          Maybe I’m just misreading you. Perhaps you’re simply pointing out that the right wing here is hardly conservative, as pointed out by Paul Craig Roberts.

          I just hope you’re not praising Hitler.

          Even certain white nationalist organizations such as Amren, as well more moderate white advocates such as Paul Craig Roberts do not dig Hitler.

          In fact, speaking from a purely pro-white perspective, Hitler was one of the greatest enemies of the white race.

          If you want to elaborate, I can cut and paste a comment I made on Jew Among You a while back, which basically explains why.

          But anyway, I think the average white conservative would be much better informed and more intelligent if they listened to The Political Cesspool as opposed to Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck.

          (of course, TPC has its flaws, and uses some shaky, overreaching logic at times, but its excellent guests and unapologetic attitude make it worth the listen)

          By the way, I don’t think that the JDL was widely praised, even among Jews. I think most Jews recognized that the JDL made them look bad.

          But yeah, it’s interesting. Wally George would invite skinhead leader Tom Metzger and Irv Rubin and have them go at it.

          He was another ignorant, overpaid neocon. But I digress.

        6. Actually Amren is a philo-Semitic controlled opposition. And as an Asian, I don’t see any reason why I should demonize or hate him for the sake of a group of people I have nothing to do with and who in fact treat my people like crap. And you really have to study the history of interwar Germany and the Weimar to get an accurate picture of Hitler and his regime, not the mainstream historical narratives that are as full of holes as Swiss cheese.

        7. Actually Amren is a philo-Semitic controlled opposition.

          Hmmm.

          I don’t know about that.

          It certainly is true that Amren has had a good number of Jewish speakers such as Michael Levin, Michael H. Hart, Rabbi Mayer Schiller, and Robert Weissberg.

          (in fact, I think that 4 out of the 10 speakers at 1 conference were Jewish)

          I also know that Jared Taylor personally repudiates anti-semitism, and on the Phil Donahue show, he said that Jews are fine with him, and that they look white.

          That being said, the Jews he invites to speak are not these radical leftists or neocons. All of them are pro-white for one reason or another, which makes them fine by me.

          Also, Taylor is smart. He knows that bashing Jews will get his organization viciously attacked, as well as chase away pro-white Jews with valuable resources.

          Of course, you could interpret that as kissing Jew ass and trying to win their acceptance, but to me Taylor’s just being strategic.

        8. Of course they are not radical leftists, but if you quizzed them on Israhell, and foreign policy, they are probably gonna be neoconnish.

      2. Also BAG, you should keep in mind that Jews have long had a tendency to inflitrate political movements and steer them in a pro-Jewish direction, thus neutralizing any effectiveness of the movement. How do you think the neocons came into being? They came into the Republican Party in the 1970s, said “Hey I’m one you guys”, and look what we have today. Kevin MacDonald has documented the dangers of allowing Jews to become members of previosly Gentile political movements.

        1. Also, why as someone who is not Jewish, should I hate Hitler when they probably don’t shed tears for anybody else’s suffering, especially when they are the cause of it, such as the millions of Slavs that the Judeo-Bolsheviks starved and shot in the pre-1945 Soviet Union? I just don’t see the need or the moral necessity of hating Hitler, who was actually much friendlier to Asians than Jews are today! Just look at Germany’s relations with Imperial Japan and Nationalist China in the 1930s.

        2. Good point about Neocons.

          Both Irving Kristol (whose son William Kristol is now an NY Times editorial writer) and Leo Strauss, the intellectual/ideological godfathers of neoconservatism were Jewish.

          While Paul Craig Roberts and other paleocons may not come out and say it, they know how true conservatism died (ie. neocons, who are disproportionately Jewish).

          I think the left is facing a similar crisis. Once committed to economic justice and human liberty, they’re now a bunch of Cultural Marxist scum, which I think is in part due to Jewish influence.

        3. Do you see the common thread between the false left (Cultural Marxist), and false right (neocons)? Both have absolutely nothing to do with the everyday concerns of the average citizen? The false left and right are fundamentally elitist and out of touch with ordinary people, whereas the genuine right (paleocons, white nationalists) and the genuine left (economic justice, anti-empire) are populist and actually give a shit about normal people’s real lives.

        4. Do you see the common thread between the false left (Cultural Marxist), and false right (neocons)? Both have absolutely nothing to do with the everyday concerns of the average citizen? The false left and right are fundamentally elitist and out of touch with ordinary people, whereas the genuine right (paleocons, white nationalists) and the genuine left (economic justice, anti-empire) are populist and actually give a shit about normal people’s real lives.

          Interesting. It does seem that both of these movements are incredibly elitist at the core.

          It doesn’t seem that the left is really interested in fostering economic justice and ensuring a greater standard of living for working and middle/lower middle class people anymore.

          Now, they’re more concerned about the hurt feelings of upper middle class blacks than the average worker of any race.

          Same with the right. They’re not interested in actually promoting truly conservative values.

          They’re just interested in American imperialism, aid to Israhell, and a very dangerous and naive brand of American exceptionalism (ie. “we’re so wonderful. Everyone wants to be like us. We should open our borders and let others basque in our greatness, and spread our wonderful democracy to 3rd world nations,” etc).

          But if you connect the dots, you see a common denominator.

        5. Can you now see the fundamental reason for my hatred of the Jews? They are a parasitic, alien elite no matter where they go, and their interests inevitably cause harm to the majority population. White Americans in the post-World War II era were incredibly retarded to allow Jews to move to this country en masse and essentially hijack all the important power centers.

        6. Anon, as an Indian I agree. Herr Hitler held my people in high esteem. That’s why he chose an Indian symbol for his movement. I happen to know that the National Socialists wanted to give Indians their own state .

    2. Yeah, what’s the fuss? The USA is what, 5% black overall? And who cares about interbreeding? It’s good to bring some black or some Jew or some Chino into the white gene pool. It strengthens the whole race. As Robert keeps pointing out some of the women of very mixed racial background are outstanding specimens of female humanity…what’s this girl’s genetic heritage at a guess? http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000783365801&ref=search.

      Chicanos are a much bigger minority and they outbreed the WASPs massively…I believe you’ve already got 35 or 40 million first language Spanish speakers, over 10%, and its growing proportionately. In some US states you need Spanish to talk to certain groups, Texas, for example, no? Verdad? Creo que si…no?

      1. 5%?

        More like 13%.

        In fact, only until recently did Hispanics surpass blacks as the largest non-white group.

        But hopefully, with Arizona’s law (which I object to for practical reasons. It won’t go after employers who hire illegals, which is what is really necessary to end the problem, but I digress) that will change.

      2. Damn she is beautiful man!

        She is from India. Hottie huh?

        Blacks are 13% of the US. The White nationalists have their panties permanently into an insane and near ER-worthy twist over this measly little morsel of fact. Big deal! It’s true that in 1940 it was 10% Black. So, over 70 years, it went up 3%. So the Black population increases by 1% every quarter century. Surely it’s time to call out the 21st Century Edward Gibbon to rewrite the Fall, but this one will be across the pond.

        Idiotic.

        Another thing that WN’s are insane about this: Whites build wonderful communities. Then Blacks move into them and destroy them. Sadly, there is a bit of truth to this, but Black populations 20% and under are quite manageable. They still cause problems, but they don’t cause mayhem.

        As the Black population increases, the Whites tend to take off. True again. There are tipping points, for schools, about 13% or so.

        Anyway, the WN’s play this up. Whites create, Blacks see the Wonders of the White Man’s Creation and head to White Eden. Which they promptly destroy through sheer numbers and their inherent nature.

        And Whites just run and run, getting away from Blacks and increasingly Hispanics. At some point, there will be nowhere left for Whites to run to. According to White Nationalisttards, this means that Blacks, 13% of the population, are going to take over every single city and town in the country! How a minority will become 51% of a nation is not explained.

        These people are hysterical. They’re like Freud’s Victorian hysteric cases from 100 years ago, but the dx is racial hysteria, the prognosis is guarded and there is no known treatment.

        1. Good points, Robert.

          However, I don’t think that WN’s are worried about blacks alone.

          In 2050, when blacks, Hispanics, and other non-whites become the majority, that’s what worries them, and who can blame them?

          How do you think China would react if China eventually became majority non-Han Chinese?

          In many ways, Robert, you’re making an argument against integration. After all, if schools and neighborhoods become shit when the black population exceeds a certain amount, then large scale integration is hardly worthy, now is it?

          It seems that you’re advocating keeping certain racial percentages down in order to keep nice white communities clean, from a racial and ecological perspective.

        2. According to White Nationalisttards, this means that Blacks, 13% of the population, are going to take over every single city and town in the country! How a minority will become 51% of a nation is not explained.

          Peter Frost thinks there’ll be a huge African immigration trend to other countries over the next century – http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2010/03/walking-to-promised-land.html.

          I think demographically this seems quite likely. And the US has a pretty permissive immigration policy. So will that change that much and if it doesn’t, will the greater distance in traveling mean that the current Hispanic wave isn’t recapitulated by Africans?

          I wonder what kind of society the US would have (will have?) if it ended up becoming 35% Hispanic, 25% Black, 30% White and 10% Asian. Maybe you’d be lucky and technological and cultural gains would cancel out any social problems?

        3. Integration is simply a right of all humans, including American humans. The results in a lot of cases are not exactly optimal, but preserving the right to integrate is simply the right thing to do, no matter what the results are.

          I wrote a piece a while back called “A Black a Block.” Those are my views. A Black a block. Spread em out and civilize em. As you can see, I’m an integrationist. Despite the problems with integration, Blacks don’t generally overrun towns and cities. Numbers usually stay quite manageable. What’s worst of all is Black segregation, where they concentrate in large numbers and take over whole cities and form ghettos. Blacks work a lot better spread out thinly. They assimilate more to the other groups, and Black culture never has a chance to get going too much.

  7. By the way Robert, excellent post.

    It seems that the far left genuinely doesn’t care about working people (particularly working white people) anymore.

    To me, the far left consists of a bunch of bourgeois blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Castrated Crackers (my made up term for self-hating whites, which I mentioned on a previous post!) who spend all of their time whining about Culturally Marxist related issues.

    Sure, they talk about “institutionalized ism,” (you can fill in the ism) fighting for justice, and ensuring a more equitable society.

    But most of it involves a bunch of upper middle class blacks and Hispanics complaining about the occasional white person who makes a remark such as “you’re not like other black people.”

    If the left would focus primarily on economics and stop kissing black and brown ass, they could actually get some more whites to vote for them, you know, the same whites that the left looks down on for “voting against their own interests.”

    Well, maybe if they would stop insisting that a handicapped white lesbian living in poverty is more “privileged” than an upper middle class black male, then that would be a good start.

    1. What’s strange is only the Western left is Culturally Marxist. The real communists who actually seized state power and actually governed nations are rather conservative in their views that would get them classed as reactionary bigots by the western Left.

  8. In variably preceeded by the words ‘extreme right-wing’ by the British press, the British National Party (or BNP), is actually more socialist than the supposed ‘workers’ party’ of Britain, the Labour Party.
    Basically, Tony Blair was Margaret Thatcher in trousers, the party he laed are and were neo-cons – fully committed to globalisation, erosion or workers rights, pay and conditions (Labour never repealed any of Thatcher’s anti-union laws), low wages and flooding Britain witha reserve army of desparate workers (to beat down wages), in the form of its cherished and argued-to-the-death policy of massive, uncontrolled third world immigration (ironically the openly pro-business Tories restricted immigration almost immediately on entering office).
    The gap between rich and poor has never been greater in modern times than after 13 years of Labour rule.
    The BNP favors re-nationalisation of public utilities, protectionist policies to shield British labour from cut-throat ‘coolie’ competition and restoration of union rights.
    Head Labour honcho Peter Mandelson (in a gay marriage with a young, Brazilian male prostitute and illegal immigrant), is a regualr house guest of the Rothschilds.

  9. Quote:” Yeah, what’s the fuss? The USA is what, 5% black overall? And who cares about interbreeding? It’s good to bring some black or some Jew or some Chino into the white gene pool. It strengthens the whole race. As Robert keeps pointing out some of the women of very mixed racial background are outstanding specimens of female humanity…what’s this girl’s genetic heritage at a guess?”

    Exactly so, and most of them and their children are gonna marry white and integrate into the white gene pool in years to come,I don’t buy into the white Population is gonna drop or disappear stuff, they are just gonna transitioned (Robert i love how that word was used in a blog a couple of days ago. ).

    1. Forget that. That will just lead to more whites with dull black-brown eyes and black hair. The contact lens, hair dye, and wig industries will love this.

      I can tell you that most mixed women do not look that good.

      Since I’m a partial non-white attracted to only white women for the most part, I’ll probably get a white sperm donor so that my future daughters won’t get my rough black hair instead of my future wife’s blonde or red hair.

  10. Quote: “I wrote a piece a while back called “A Black a Block.” Those are my views. A Black a block. Spread em out and civilize em”

    Break them up into small but manageable numbers, great idea.

  11. But! The entire Western Left is into this crap! Retarded or what? As a logical consequence, I have known White Leftist workers who despise the US Left as anti-White and “only cares about the Blacks and the Mexicans.” I joined the Communist Party USA a while back and told them about a friend who was also a Communist. The CPUSA very much wanted to give him a membership, but when I asked him, he refused to be associated with them, as he saw them as “anti-White worker.”

    The Left in the US is simply insane, and they have completely blown off (and blown it with) the US White working class.
    ===

    heg: “But! The entire Western Left is into this crap! Retarded or what?”

    The higesth worldly power you can get is to control the state. lf you can control the state you can do anyting you want. This is what the jew want. But to HIDE what jew run communism really is about, the JEW Karl Marx wrote a stockpile of jewish bullshit and called it Marxism.

    So when you who call yourself Left lntellectuals was at home wanking over jewish bullshit, the jew took over YOUR country’s state.

    Marxism is jew made porn for retards that think they are “intellectuals”, because that is what the jews call you when you read and write about the jewish bullshit Marxism.

    Look at this video and look at right over Obama NoBody’s shoulder. That is the JEW Rahm “Rahmbo” Emanuel. He is Obama’s jew handler. This Jew controls YOUR state. He has the Masterkey to the Whore House.

    Today you get free porn on all jew owed TalmudVision channels in the whole western world. You can wank to that or if you think you got more brain, you can wank to the jewish bullshit called Marxism, Das Kapital should give you a good hardon. Anywitchway, your a retard. And the jew controls YOUR state.

    Why do the jew give you free porn? To HIDE that the jews have taken control of YOUR state. The jew will tell you any bullshit, but tell you that the jews have taken control of your state. The jew will give you anything for free, except give you control of your state.

    Do you know why this jew-crap works? Because YOU have no idea of what controls YOUR state.

    What controls your state is the elite. What the jews did in Soviet-Russia 1917 was that they took the phone book, there the entire russian elite was. What the jews did then was that they went to their homes and took man, wife and children to the forest and shoot them. Then a jew family moved into the now empty house. The jew exchanged the old russian elite with a new JEW elite.

    You didn’t know that did you? No, because you was home wanking over jewish porn bullshit called Marxism.

    But what the jews realised after they had exchanged the old white elite with a new jew elite was that they had fuck’d up Russia to the core. Because the jew had no idea how to run a state.

    Well, the jewh ave done the same as they did in Russia 1917 in the entire western world. But this time the jew did it slowely and keept a bit of the old elite, they who know how to run the state.

    To understand how this works you only have to look at lvy Leauge. This is as much old white elite as it get’s. lvy Leauge is as WASP it can get – and the jews are in total control of lvy League 2010.

    Take any HeadMaster at any lvy League and it’s a jew or a “minority”. Do yo think any “minority” is control the jews? Think again.

    This is how the jews have taken over YOUR state, the jews have forced out the old white elite and step by step exchanged the old elite with jews or their Useful ldiot’s, “minority”.

    The jews did this when you was at home wanking over jewish bullshit, call it Marxism or free cabel-porn, just the same jew bullshit. Why? To HIDE that the jews have taken control of YOUR state, your country.

    Here is the jew that controls your state, America. Can you see him?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O0kwvFtEl0

      1. Well Robert, you’re one hell of an “intellectual”. Just keep wanking Robert, the jew want you to.

        l spook face to face with an old communist diehard the other day. The real commie glasses and everything, in his 60s, his wife too. l explained to them what l have told you and do you know what they did?

        They both nodded. Do you know whay? Because after being a retard all their life, the jew call them “left intellectuals”, they realised that al their lie the had been retards. They were very depressed.

        Who can blame them. l asked where they come from. – Belgium. Then l told them: Belgium is a jew run shithole.

        You know whagt they both did? They nodded. -You know about the jew? The both nodded. Then l told them what the jews REALLY did in Soviet 1917. And they both nodded all the time.

        Why they as non-jews buy into the jew bullshit called marxism is because they think they are going to be the New Elite. They know the jew but they can’t connect the dots. That l did for them and they realised that everything the jews do is all about one thing, the jews exchanging the old white elite with jews and Useful ldiot’s.

        While they were at home wanking over jew porn called marxism the jews had taken control of their state. l told them that THEY had helped the jews to take over their country and then the jew have turned their country into a jew run shithole. They undertood and that’s why they were depressed.

        The jews controls the American state lock, stock and shekel. But you just keep wanking over the jew supplied free´porn, call it marxism, free cabelporn or whatever you want, as long as you don’t see the jew …

        1. LMFAO Heg!..you are so funny…you crack me up…you really should get a stand-up show and do your jew act on prime time TV! It would be a gas!

        2. Yes it’s funny – to a jew that is. You jews like to kill people. The whole world can see that live on TalmudVision.
          ========

          We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

          And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty dwarf.”

          http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

          Hysterical funny.

  12. Obama better NOT even try to have open borders!

    I will move to europe if he tries to pull that bullshit on us!

  13. Hey heg, I HOPE that youtube vid is a joke!

    WHAT THE HELL?!!

    Impeach that moron!

    He violates the rules and laws of the land and now he’s trying to destroy america!

  14. @ Robert. Thx for this article. lt made me realise something l didn’t. Here you can go to any town and there are officises for the “Worker” Unions all over. What puzzled me was that they are all plastered with multiiculti propaganda. The Union is working overtime to let more immigrants in.

    Who started all the Unions? The jews. The “workers” unions are all a jew run global mafia. How do you come from a jew ghetto in Poland and become rich? You start a union and get a lot of people pay you a monthly fee. Now you’re a rich jew. And then you can start to make political demands. And on top of that you can use the union to break non-jew ownede companies. No union has ever striked or made problem to jew run companies.

    l got to hand that to the jew, that was clever.

    Is Race Traitor aligned with any…uh…social movement as we understand it? Or is it highly marginal like White nationalism?

    The jews are using the white workers money to work AGAINST the white working class interest. The unions is NOT run by white people, they are all jew run. To spot a jew run union is easy, just look for the multiculti propaganda. That will tell you who run that union.

    The jew run unions is also freemason for the rank and file, the (m)asses. To spot any potensial possible future leader. Do you know what “work” the jews did in the jew run Soviet? They supervised the jews slaves. Also known as “workers”. That is the jews codeword for their slaves.

    With the jew run freemason and the jew run freemason for the (m)asses the jews have total control on who might be a useful idiot to the jews, and who they do not want as leader for the (m)asses. The jews run the unions, no white people would have the agenda all the unions are pushing. Cui bono? Who benefits? The jews. l knew since l was 17 that the unions are a mafia. Now l know who’s mafia.

  15. The Marxists in 1917 sent over 1200 telegraph technicians, and cut all the node lines (trunk lines they call them in Australia), and re-wired the terminals with secure boxes, to Moscow and St. Petersburg, effectively controlling Russian telegraph communications within a few weeks. The more spread out a country, like Russia or America, the more vulnerable it is to having internal communications cut. The Marxists cut communications. That was virtually all they focused on . Sent over a thousand terrorists with arms and tech training and disabled the ability of the White Army to fight back.

  16. The jews in 1917 sent over 1200 telegraph technicians, and cut all the node lines (trunk lines they call them in Australia), and re-wired the terminals with secure boxes, to Moscow and St. Petersburg, effectively controlling Russian telegraph communications within a few weeks. The more spread out a country, like Russia or America, the more vulnerable it is to having internal communications cut. The jews cut communications. That was virtually all they focused on . Sent over a thousand terrorists with arms and tech training and disabled the ability of the White Army to fight back.

    In a war zone, does the US military use a wired internet? They use a 22 node Wireless Optical internet, because it can’t be cut.

    The Internet is like a brain. When the Marxists took Russia, they divided it in two. They seized a communication corridor from St. Petersburg to the Caspian sea, cutting off communication between western and eastern Russia. Preventing the White Army forces from coordinating counter attacks.

  17. Here is you’re wet dream “revolution” explained.

    What the jews did was take over the phone net. Then the jews went to the generals home and took his wife and children. Then they told the general to fight as he was told or they would give him back his family in bodyparts.

    Well, they were to be shot anyway but that the general didn’t know, so he did as he was told. The jews made russian fight russians. By that the jew more or less wiped out the entire old army.

    Then came the jew Trotzky and made a new jew army. And how that was done is easy, the jews rounded up russian peasants and then the jews beat one to death infront of the rest. -Anyone else that don’t want to obey orders? Step forward.

    Then the jews took the phone book and killed the ENTIRE old elite and jews moved into their houses. Replacing the old elite with a New Jew Elite. And then the jews turned Russia into a jew run police state.

    Today the jews are doing EXACTLY the same thing in America. Jews own all the companies that controls all the airports in America. The jews owns or controls all phone companies. The ONLY way the jews could have taken over Russia in 1917 was because they took control of the phone network and cut the cables.

    What really happened in Russia 1917 was a well planned coup by the jews. Map.

    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t727617-13/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *