Comment from a Hispanic on an Article About the Arizona Immigration Law

From the comments at the end of an article on the Arizona immigration law, from Rosio:

our kids are future of AMERCA! can’t you see WE ARE HUMAN BEENS WE ARE NOT ‘ILLEGAL ALIENS’

LOL!

Let’s forget about the fucked up sentence structure. Syntax lessons come later. Spelling is first.

You love America, but you can’t even spell it.

Yeah, you’re human beens. Or is it human beans? Pintos or refried?

Rosio’s Tard Outburst was followed by a lot of snarky comments telling him to go back to Mexico and make tacos. That’s shitty, but he asked for it, no?

On a lot of these forums, the Hispanics come on there and make all sorts of dumbass misspellings. Obviously, Hispanics are stupefyingly ignorant. However, having been around Mexicans most of my life, I can say with confidence that these folks are not stupid. They are way smarter than you think. And most of them are way better looking than your average fat White person nowadays too.

Blacks do this on forums all the time too. They go on forums and “fight the White racists” by making posts full of all sorts of idiot misspellings.

Way to go, tools! Fight the evil White racists spreading lies about who stupid you are by acting like a Special Ed student.

People please. Spell checker is your friend. Comes built in with any recent Mozilla build. Mozilla checks your spelling on any forum, blog or other posts you make. It’s like your Mom looking over your shoulder correcting your mistakes so you don’t look stupid on the Internet in front of much of humanity the globe over.

Musings on Dual Loyalty, Judaism as Zionism, and Anti-Semitism

Repost from the old site.

Always-perceptive commenter James Schipper makes some astute, terse and cut to the chase comments on my post, The “New Anti-Semitism.” In it, he moves beyond the typically vulgar anti-Semitism that much modern anti-Zionism descends into and offers a perfectly logical explanation for the dual loyalty accusation leveled at Jews.

He also brings up some very difficult questions about the differences between Judaism and Zionism and whether there is really any difference at all.

Schipper:

If criticism of Israel = anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism, then we should be proud to call ourselves anti-Semites.

What is really wrong with Israel? It is not such a bad country for Jews, or even for the Arabs in Israel proper. I would rather be a Jew in Israel than an Arab in any Arab country. Israel was born in sin, but so was every country in the Western hemisphere. Israel is oppressive in the occupied territories, but by historical standards, this oppression is hardly unique.

The real reason for opposing Israel is that it does not see itself as the country of its citizens but as the country of all the Jews in the world. According to Israel, Jews in other countries are living in exile, are really Israelis and should be loyal to Israel.

In other words, Israel expects the Jewish citizens of other countries to behave like Israel’s fifth-columnists, and that is exactly what Zionists outside Israel are.

No political party outside Israel should accept Zionists as members, and no government outside Israel should appoint Zionists to a senior government job. Instead, Zionist should be encouraged to put their bodies where their loyalties are: in Israel.

Suppose that Italy saw itself as the country of all Catholics in the world and expected Catholics everywhere to defend Italian interests, then it would be behaving exactly as Israel does. That would also be a good reason for non-Catholics in other countries to look at Catholics with suspicion and to regard Italy with hostility.

The late Arthur Koestler wrote in an essay that after 1948 all Jews should choose one of two options: go to Israel or abandon Judaism altogether. He is right insofar as Judaism implies Zionism.

Judaism has always posited that Jews are a people and that Israel is their promised land, which is also the position of Zionism. If Judaism implies Zionism, then Jews outside of Israel, it they want to remain Jewish, should emigrate to Israel or else detribalize and deterritorialize Judaism, which may be denaturing it.

Theological question: Why does Obama allow bad things to happen and evil people to prosper?

More seriously, why did Obama appoint a hard Zionist as his chief of staff? It is not a good sign.

I agree with several things in this post.

First of all, he attacks some of the usual broadsides leveled at Israel and dismisses them.

What I find disturbing, and many Zionists have noted this, is the particular vehemence many Israel-critics level at Israel’s oppression of Jews inside Israel, while they are silent or even supportive of even worse oppression by states against minorities outside Israel.

White nationalists think it’s awesome for Whites to treat non-Whites like shit, except when it comes to White Jews versus “muds” in Israel. Kurds in the Arab World are treated awfully bad, Berbers less so but still poorly, and the Shia are oppressed all over the Arab World. There is open oppression and violence against Christians in Egypt and Iraq.

Baha’i are treated horribly in Iran, Sunnis less so but still poorly, and the Ahwaz have some good beefs. Turks treat Kurds horribly in Turkey. Russia has massacred 20% of the population of Chechnya in what can only be termed a genocide. China’s treatment of the Uighurs and Tibetans is disgraceful. Treatment of Hindus in Pakistan is shameful, and NE Indian Asians are treated poorly by the Indian state.

Japan treats its Koreans, Burakumin and Ainu pretty badly. The Hmong are still treated like shit in Laos, and the Montagnards are not done well by Vietnam. Pygmies are openly genocided and cannibalized as a matter of custom in Zaire, and the Khoisan are nearly murdered at will in SW Africa.

There is a real genocide of Arabs against Africans in Darfur, and another one, Arabs versus Christians, has just ended in South Sudan. Africans are routinely enslaved by Arabs in the Sahel.

We could go and on, but you get the picture. What is disturbing about all of this is that most Israel-critics are either indifferent to, ignorant of or even supportive of, the maltreatment of minorities above. Zionists are correct that this is either ignorance or anti-Semitism.

All, or most all, modern nations were born in sin.

This was due to the nature of the modern nation-building exercise, which typically involved ethnic cleansing or some sort of mass killing or genocide of any existing indigenous people, sidelining, subjection, forced assimilation (cultural genocide) or outright genocide against anyone not part of the dominant nation of the nation-state, and forced destruction of all languages but the one chosen by the nation-state or that is the dominant nation.

The Modern Left in the West, which has adopted Third-Worldism, minority-hugging and European hatred with gusto, errs in singling out Europeans for particular abuse in terms of nation-building. It’s been bloody and awful everywhere and at all times.

Schipper also points out that although Israel is oppressive in the Occupied Territories, by comparative standards, they are relatively mild. Considering the outrageous provocations and attacks of the Palestinians, I am amazed Israel has gone as easy on them as it has.

Arabs do not believe in fighting wars in a civilized manner, and the Geneva Conventions are regarded by them as Western comedy. Any Arab state faced with Palestinian-type provocations by non-Arabs would have been vastly worse than Israel.

Truthfully, just about every nation fighting an insurgency has been more horrible that Israel by orders of magnitude.

Consider this: according to counterinsurgency doctrine, enshrined by the US military and state and promoted by the US media and both US political parties, any civilian who “supports” an insurgency needs to be arrested, beaten, tortured and killed. All counterinsurgencies supported by the US have routinely massacred, mutilated and tortured to death insurgency “supporters.”

This has been true in every counterinsurgency in Latin America, in Indonesia in 1965, the US counterinsurgencies in SE Asia during the Vietnam War, the counterinsurgencies in Mozambique, Algeria and Angola, Russia’s counterinsurgency in Chechnya, India’s counterinsurgencies in India proper and Kashmir, in Sri Lanka against the Tamils, in Indonesia against the Acehese and East Timorese, in the Philippines against the NPA, and in Nepal’s recent Civil War.

In these counterinsurgencies, hundreds of thousands of “supporters” of insurgencies were murdered, tortured and mutilated, while the US cheered, poured in money and looked the other way.

In contrast, almost 100% of Palestinians seem to support the Palestinian insurgency. Clearly, Israel has not been going around killing “supporters” of the insurgency. If they did, they would have killed tens of thousands of Palestinians so far.

Considering the provocations of the Palestinians, Israel has fought one of the cleanest counterinsurgencies in modern times.

Zionists are correct that these criticisms of Israel, combined with support for to indifference to much worse behaviors by non-Jews, are evidence of either ignorance or anti-Semitism.

But Schipper does hit it on the head.

The reason to oppose Israel is that it is not a state of its citizens. Israel openly says that it is the state of all Jews on Earth, not of its citizens. Hence, it is perfectly reasonable for non-Jews in every nation on Earth containing Jews to look upon their Jews as possible traitors and dual-loyalists. Dual loyalty, rather than being an “anti-Semitic canard” as many Jews shrilly screech, is actually grounded in immaculate reason.

Schipper also suggests that the wall between Judaism and Zionism may be little more than a wall of sand, and one that has been hit by so many waves that there’s almost nothing left.

Although anti-Zionist Jews offer various reasons for their non-support of Israel, the fact remains that Judaism has always said that Israel is the land of the Jews. Assuming the Messiah returns tomorrow, even Naturei Karta is willing to head to Israel and become fervent Zionists.

Hence the uncomfortable notion, typically parroted by ferocious anti-Zionists and some vulgar anti-Semites, that it is not just Zionism that is the problem, but Judaism itself, is lent some troubling weight. I don’t want to go near this thesis because to be honest, I’m a pussy when it comes to the Jewish Question.

Schipper finally suggests that the Jews of the world either renounce Judaism or practice what you preach and head to Israel. Once again, troubling stuff.

There’s nary a trace of anti-Semitism in Schipper’s comments, but the issues he raises are toxic as Hell.

Just some thought-meals.

Enjoy.

Schipper On Jews, Modernism and the Left

Repost from the old site.

Astute commenter James Schipper comments on the Statement on Jews and Antisemitism post:

Another intellectual flaw of anti-Semites is overgeneralization. Jews live in dozens of different countries and Judaism varies from superorthodoxy to reformism, but they see all Jews as the same. That’s only possible if Jews are seen as a race and if their race explains their behavior.I don’t think that Jews created modernity. It is the other way around: modernity created the post-ghetto Jew. Starting with revolutionary France, Jews in Europe were emancipated, that is, their separate legal status was abolished and they became ordinary citizens.

Since they still were outsiders to some extent, most of them were attracted to leftism, which, being the ideology of change, obviously would be preferred by outsiders. Conservativism is the ideology of those who are well-integrated in and happy with the status quo.

The fact that Jews are overrepresented among leftists has nothing to do with Judaism but everything with their minority status and their historical situation as often persecuted outsiders. We need sociological, not theological or biological explanations for Jewish behavior.

Biology explains only Jewish over-representation in intellectually demanding professions because there is every reason to assume that Jews have on average more innate intelligence than Gentiles.

My view is that Jews in Palestine were not smarter than the people around them, but that it was the smartest ones that in Roman times were expelled from or left Palestine in disproportionate numbers. Those that stayed behind were eventually assimilated.

Surely there is nothing in the genes of the Jew that creates “the Jew”. When you delve into anti-Semitism, pretty soon, you find that most rightwing White racialist anti-Semites believe that the evils of the Jew are located in the genes. I consider this to be nonsense, but we shall await the findings of modern genetics. I doubt if anything will turn up.

Hyperethnocentrism along with tendencies towards insularity, clannishness, xenophobia, paranoia and and even racism tend to occur across all types of Jews. I feel this is due to culture. As evidence, I note that many converts to Judaism quickly develop all of these characteristics, often in spades. That seems to seal the case for cultural Jewishness right there.

Schipper neatly sums up why the Jews have been attracted to the Left. In all this time, I have never heard anyone say it quite so succinctly. Outsiders are attracted to the Left, so Blacks and Hispanics in the US vote Democratic. Those satisfied with the status quo are conservative, hence Whites in the US are conservative.

Schipper’s analysis also probably explains the new emergence of a considerable movement in the US of conservative Jews. Antisemitism in the US has been reduced to a shadow of itself, and Jews are more successful than any other ethnic group.

When they were still getting barred from country clubs, and when signs said, “No Jews or dogs allowed,” Jews had a great reason to vote liberal, whatever their economic fortunes. Now that they’ve got life dicked here in the US, a number of them are well-integrated in and happy with the status quo and the phenomenon of the rightwing Jew has appeared.

I doubt if the Jews who left Palestine were any smarter than the ones who stayed, but I don’t have a lot of proof.

I suspect that Talmudic culture, which developed in Europe after 900 with the solidification of the Babylonian Talmud, with its emphasis on learning (Jewish men who could not learn the Talmud left the ghetto and converted to Christianity), along with the smartest Jewish men being seen as the best marriage partners for Jewish women, had a lot to do with selection for intelligence and high Ashkenazi IQ, though I realize that this ought to also predict high IQ in Mizrachi Jews, and their IQ is not notably high.

Public Service Killings and NHI Cases

Repost from the old site.

Public service killings – a recent case in Fresno. I think the killer is a hero. The gangbanger pushed his way into the guy’s house, sat down, demanded a drink and a cigarette, and I guess refused to leave. A fight ensued and Brian Waldron, a fine, upstanding citizen, defended himself against the Bulldog gang member animal, hitting him with a stick and killing him.

Then he buried the body, which not a very smart thing to do. Furthermore, you foul God’s Earth by placing such dead nastiness in it. Chopping up the body is pretty horrid too.

Cops call some cases like this (good guy kills bad guy) “public service killings”. I agree. This guy just got caught is all. Looks like he’s going down on homicide charges, but I vote to acquit.

Cases where one gangbanger or criminal scumbag kills another are referred to by cops as “NHI” cases. NHI means “no humans involved”.

Haha.

This Is Not Schizophrenia

Repost from the old site.

This is not schizophrenia. Let’s look at some symptoms here that a fellow is reporting in a weight-lifting forum. Many of the commenters are replying that the guy has “the beginnings of schizophrenia”, “mild schizophrenia” “schizophrenia”, etc, etc ad nauseum. Let’s take a look at his symptoms:

At night, no matter what I do. Not every night it always happens during the week when I have to work the next day, I cannot fall asleep. Music, TV, RX pills, Tylenol PM, melatonin. Even taken together, mixed and matched, I cant fall asleep sometimes. And my body is tired, but my brain wont shut up. And I’m not even thinking about anything important. Sometimes, just fucking music is playing.And it will keep my up, not sleeping 2-3-4 nights in a row. By the 3rd day, I feel delirious, and I didn’t want to train the other day, cause I was afraid I’d hurt myself from how slow, and tired my body felt. I’m trying not to smoke as much pot lately, cause I’m cutting, losing weight.

It’s effecting my home life, my job, my training, my relationships. Someone asked me if it was because I was depressed. I really don’t have much to be depressed about. I have a good job, I make good money, I get laid, my own place. If I’m depressed, I don’t know why.

It’s almost like I’m “tripping” is how much sense it doesn’t make -like when you’re on acid and your mind is racing and none of it applies to anything, or means anything. Random craziness.

I hear voices (not like telling me to kill or anything) but just random babbling and the voices change like they’re inhaling helium. It doesn’t make any sense. Other times, random songs play through my head and I cant shut them off. I can only control them by putting other songs in, but that causes me to strain my brain and think hard when I’m trying to relax my mind.

My head sometimes gets heavy too, like it weighs like 50 lbs, and my equilibrium gets off balance sometimes. Like a concussion.

OK, the guy is unable to control the thoughts in his head. Thoughts, crazy thoughts, random nonsense, just races through his head with little or no control over it at all. Songs, uncontrolled and unbidden, pop up in his head unbidden and play by themselves in his head.

He can’t shut any of this bullshit off, and the only way to stop the music is to substitute one stupid song for another. I am assuming the “voices” he is hearing are voices in his head, not outside of his head. Fortunately, you can hear all the voices in your head as possible without being mentally ill, though it really isn’t ideal.

It’s crucial to realize that psychotics who hear voices actually hear them with their ears, not in their minds. We all “hear voices” in our heads. Our “inner voice” is a voice inside of our heads. The idiot media and popular does not do us any good by refusing to differentiate these symptoms. Psychotic voices heard with one’s ears are transformed into “voices in his head”.

Obviously, if it’s sane to one one “inner voice”, it’s not psychotic to have more than one, or an unlimited number, though it’s not exactly ideal. You could even have animal sounds in your head.

Hang on.

OK, I just made some animal sounds in my head. There was a cow and a monkey and now there’s a lion. Does that make me schizophrenic? Come on.

If you follow the discussion, you will note that many of his friends on there tell him that he is developing schizophrenia. I do not believe he is doing any such thing, and this is not a symptom of incipient schizophrenia anyway.

I’ve been around folks in the prodrome of schizophrenia, and while their functioning was still ok enough, they were hallucinating (hearing voices) a significant part of the time. No amount of argument could convince them that the voices were not actually real, nor would they believe me when I said I didn’t hear them. This is a pretty typical picture of incipient schizophrenia.

Keep in mind that the vast majority of schizophrenics hear voices. In fact, if you don’t hear voices, I wonder if you really have schizophrenia.

What’s also interesting is that, terrifying and weird as these symptoms are, a number of the commenters admit that they have experienced them – they say they have had strange, out of control, unbidden random thoughts and music in their heads before. So, while it’s not optimal, this stuff seems to be pretty common.

What’s the diagnosis for out of control, random, unbidden thoughts and songs in your head? I say nothing. There’s no DSM dx that has a criteria like that as a sole criteria.

Just like “having a weird look in your eyes” does not give you a mental illness dx either. There are all sorts of folks walking around with all kinds of weird and crazy looks in their eyes. While it’s disconcerting, it’s not necessarily indicative of mental illness. There is no DSM dx for “has a weird or crazy look in their eyes.”

You need to be nuttier than just that. What gives people weird looks in their eyes if they aren’t nuts? Who knows? God knows what goes in people’s minds. But as long as your speech and behavior remains normal, you’re not mentally ill.

Why am I writing about this crap? I’m on a crusade to get people to quit being such morons about mental health. Even if we aren’t ill ourselves, it doesn’t help to give out false dx’s and go around accusing non mentally-ill folks of “being crazy”. It’s insulting, stupid and cruel.

Personally, I never refer to other humans with words like “weird”, “crazy”, “nuts”, etc.

Instead, I’m going to give you some specific description of their behavior, possibly with a potential dx. I can usually figure out what might be wrong with someone after spending a bit of time around them. I can almost always tell if they are psychotic or not, and usually if they are obviously dangerous or not.

Life’s tough for everyone and probably few of us make it out unscathed.

Great Site On Ethnic Groups In China

Repost from the old site.

From the Chinese government.

That isn’t really the homepage; I can’t find the homepage, so just click to the left on any ethnic groups you want to read about.

Lists all of the official minorities, with a good anthropological background for them, along with a good history, a bit about the language, customs, religious beliefs, culture, etc., then onto recent history.

The history and recent history is written according to Marxist economic analysis, and shows how the coming of the Chinese Revolution really did improve things for many minorities.

I’ve been scared to read the part about the Tibetans and Uighurs.

I’m sure in the case of Tibet it will talk about how the revolution ended feudalism (Yes, there was real feudalism in Tibet.) in Tibet and made life better for most Tibetans. One thing no one tells you about the Free Tibet crowd was that the Dalai Lama presided over a particularly horrible modern form of feudalism, complete with castes and out and out slavery.

The site does provide a tremendous amount of evidence that the Chinese revolution has resulted in tremendous improvements in the lives of many Chinese minorities. Anti-Communists seem to be blind to that fact. Life in China in 1949 and the decades prior was no picnic!

It’s pretty cool to have an anthropological overview of lots of interesting ethnic groups written strictly from a Marxist perspective. More typical is this one, still very well-done, but written by hardline Estonian anti-Communists. It deals with the ethnic groups of the Former Soviet Union.

I wasn’t aware that the USSR had destroyed every single ethnic group in the country until these stalwart Balts informed me. I realize the Balts are pissed, but it needn’t taint your scholarship.

Yet Another Fake Quote

Repost from the old site.

This one making the rounds of White nationalist, White Supremacist, etc. sites:

In 1922, the Bolshevik leader Selenkov stated in Moscow: “We must create a climate of anti-nationalism and anti-racialism amongst Whites. We must reduce patriotism and pride of race to meaningless abstractions and make racialism a dirty word.”

Not only that, but obviously Selenkov was Jewish. Or he was named Zelenkov. Or whatever.

There never was any Bolshevik leader named Zelenkov/Selenkov, and for all I or others can tell, this is yet another fake quote.

You can usually tell these fake quotes just be looking at them, because it seems like no sane prominent person would ever be caught dead saying something so outrageous.

Also, fake quotes are usually manufactured by nationalists. They place the quotes in the mouths of politicians they don’t like and make them say they are going to hatch some kind of conspiracy against the ethnic group or nation in question.

The Most Anti-Immigrant Ethnic Group in the US

Repost from the old site.

The American Indians of USA.

Obviously, they are all a bunch of ranting, raving, seething, vicious, genocidal, hate-filled scum, right? No, wait. They can’t be. Only White people can be racist. I forgot. Silly me.

So where are the Nutcase Liberal-Left and the Minority Professional Victims when it comes to abusing these vicious, evil US Amerindians? Nowhere to be seen. Why is that? They’re all busy beating up on those vile White folks.

Why are US Amerindians so anti-immigration? Think about it. Real hard.

English Attacking Bahasa Indonesia in Indonesia

English is the global destroyer, taking out native languages here and there, right and left, over there and over here. I’ve never heard of it damaging actual national languages yet.

Looks like it’s going to town on Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia) somewhat. Pretty weird when people in either speaking the national language poorly or not at all. Actually, it ridiculous. It’s like Ireland all over again, this time shamrocks in Bali.

Hot Black Chicks – SWV

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmGzTsB_Ji8&hl=en_US&fs=1?rel=0&border=1]

Alpha was wondering a while back why I don’t do posts on beautiful Black women. I think it’s because I have eclectic tastes in Black women. Some of them look fantastic to me, but a lot of others just do not. A lot of times I look at a Black woman and I think, “Wow! She looks hot!” Then I start wondering if she’s really good-looking or not, since I was raised White on the “all Black women are ugly” thing, and unfortunately, that’s still a part of me.

Anyway, this band is called SWV. It’s a hip-hop R & B band from New York, a trio of three females. They are about 22-23 years old in this video.

Looking at stills of them, I still start going round and round with the, “Are they really beautiful?” thing, but in this video, I must say that all three of them are incredibly hot. I don’t know if it’s makeup, hair, cameras, who knows? Who cares? They don’t look quite as good underwater.

It’s a common theme in White society that all Black women are ugly. If you protest, like I do, you get, “Yeah, some of them are! If they have some White in them!” You know, the pure Black is so ugly. Well, check out SWV. How much White are they? 15%? Is that all it takes to do the beauty transforming thing?

White nationalists are insistent, against all reasonable evidence, that all Black women are naturally ugly. Looking at this video, I say, “Fuck you White nationalists!”

Great Anti-Racist Show from Disneyland

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKt_o6AflbI]

From the highly racist and tumultuous year of 1964 in the USA, the “It’s a Small World” show at Disneyland. Of course, it’s a glorious show, and I’ve been on that ride many times. I probably even rode it in 1964.

After you watch the video for a while, you realize that it’s a great anti-racist and even anti-ultranationalist message. There’s no need to elaborate on it; it speaks for itself.

Sure, humans are different, but the more time you spend with humans from all over the world, you realize that they really are not all that different.

Men act like men, everywhere on Earth. Women act like women, all over the world. And humans act like humans, around the globe. To me, this implies that despite Communist idiot theory, maleness, femaleness and humanness are not really social and societal constructs and formations after all. Instead, these identities are probably coded heavily in our genes. If you don’t believe me, make a friend from or in another part of the world. You’ll be surprised how much they are alike the Americans around you.

This one video is worth 100 Tim Wise lectures and Abagond posts. If you’re talking anti-racism, what more is there to say than this simple message?

The Death of Middle Class White Culture

Erranter, a new and great commenter who is very smart and is also an excellent writer, writes about the death of the middle class:

While the economic loss of the middle class is indisputable and lamentable, I think that the loss of certain middle class values is of even greater concern. Some of these values can be quite inhibiting and it’s understandable that so many impulsive, lively intellectuals of the last century wanted to crush them, but they had to realize what they’re going to supplant them with for the mass of men.While a select few may be able to go it alone and survive by their wits and be their own moral guide, most people need guidance. Hell, even the select do. The simple values of self-restraint, merit, playing by the rules, forward thinking – all middle class values – are necessary to everything we currently think of as civilization.

I get annoyed being around them for too long, but I wouldn’t really want most kids to grow up bohemian or hick. It helps give me “structure” and the middle class on the whole is rather open to change and new ideas, which the lower classes aren’t. I still get annoyed, but I’ve got to admit there isn’t yet much of a better option I can think of, because hardly anybody’s born rich.

Basically, I went to the part today and I saw a bunch of pregnant 16 yr olds, various hicks of all races, the usual romp of morons and sluts, making you horny for no good reason and then going over to the guy in board shorts with tats all over his back. In my mind I felt like a whiny geezer but I couldn’t help it.

These people have a crappy culture. I was the only one with a book and was afraid as I walked over the bridge I would get insulted for it. It’s like middle school all over again. It’s some sort of lower class mishmash culture that all the races are adopting. They probably hang their walls with beer banners and babe calendars. Anyway, a lot of these people were probably “middle class” economically.

But big F-ing deal. All that really means is they can afford to drive SUVs and eat out. If you spread the money to them and they don’t grow up and ascend to a reasonable level of civilization then what’s the point of them having money?

Maybe I’m just getting pissed off by American culture. I love America, I tell myself. But do I? Maybe it was flawed from the start. Has this always been our general level. And isn’t the truth that this country was set up for businessmen, landowners, lawyers, moneymakers of all kinds?

We don’t name cities or roads after writers or artists. Industrialists, statesmen we adore, but mention you like to read and write at a family reunion and everyone will stare at you, then somebody will say, “but how are you going to make money with that?”

I can only speak from the POV of White culture. Yes, an intellectual and non-trashy White middle class culture used to exist. My father’s family grew up in it (Actually, they were poor!), and so did I as a boy. It still exists in the upper middle classes and the rich. Poor Whites have always acted pretty bad, and the middle classes have always looked down on them, I would say appropriately so.

But even working class Whites used to have a decent culture. My neighbor growing up was a working class Greek man married to a Mexican woman. I was best friends with their kids, especially their oldest son. I still am.

This guy immigrated from Greece and had a high school education at best, but he could talk your ear off about any intellectual subject under the sun. He was basically an autodidact. I remember once I loaned him a copy of Catcher in the Rye (on request!) and he returned it a while later with a slight knowing smile. He got it. How many ordinary people get that book, I mean really, really get it? His sons told me that he liked to read too.

I worked a lot of White working class jobs growing up, and it was not unusual to find bright working class men of all ages who liked to read and were frankly intellectuals of sorts. White society has always respected that sort of things, even if they were seen as a little odd or even quaint. They didn’t look down on it, instead they were sort of mystified by intellectuals.

I can’t comment on middle class Black society.

Asian society in the US has always respected intellectual pursuits, as do the East Indian Punjabis around here.

The Mexicans really don’t, but if you go down to Mexico, there is a thriving intellectual culture. There is a huge respect for intellectuals in Peru, Colombia, Brazil and Argentina, a legacy of their Spanish colonial past. It’s an honor to be a man of letters down there. Same in Russia, France, Germany, the UK, Italy, Turkey, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, the Netherlands and even in the Arab World. Intellectuals are respected in almost all Asian countries, even SE Asia, the Philippines and Indonesia.

Only in the USA is this sort of thing scorned upon!

What’s happened is the mass dumbing down of middle class White culture to the worst of White culture, as in poor Whites, and also the worst of Underclass Black and Hispanic culture. It’s Idiocracy World.

The White middle class has been proletarianized in the worst way. They aren’t stupid, but they are pitifully ignorant. I knew business owners and pharmacists who never read the paper or watched the news. They didn’t know the slightest fucking thing about current events, or much of anything else.

I just came off 18 years in a White working class small town in the Sierra Nevada. The Idiocracy was deep rooted and pervasive there, even among the middle classes. At the same time, the uptight values of the White middle class along with lunatic Christian fundamentalism were everywhere. It’s the worst of the Old White Middle Class (the uptight part) combined with the worst of the New White Middle Class (the dumbed down crap part). There’s almost literally nothing of value there.

You don’t have to be all that bright to develop a world-class intellectual and civilized culture. A recent survey put France’s IQ at 94. That’s all you need. Ours is 98. We have no excuse.

“I Still Love You, Frank,” by Abiezer Coppe

Like many artists, Frank Zappa had a juvenile attitude and never really grew up. His anarcho-capitalist politics were puerile. He treated his wife Gail badly. He consumed groupies. His sexual politics sucked. He hated Communism and hippies. He hated a lot of things. He chainsmoked himself, defiantly, to an early grave. He called tobacco his favourite vegetable.
Parts of his early albums like Absolutely Free are almost unlistenable. I still prefer The Beatles’ Sergeant Pepper’s to Frank Zappa’s scathing and justifiable skit on it, We’re Only In It For The Money. His guitar solos can be sterile displays of pyrotechnic virtuosity. Yet there are also passages of astonishing beauty.
So why do I still love you, Frank? Part of it has to do with being banged up in a girl free boys’ boarding school, aged 16 and horny, with no fag inclinations, and listening to Brown Shoes Don’t Make It for the first time. Off the planet weird genius sings about unmentionable sexual acts with 13 year old girls. Excellent. We had to hear more.
We devoured the early Mothers albums. He was the politically incorrect antidote to stuffy English conformism. We the interned and hungry for anything that smacked of life thought it was cool.
He is the greatest satirist in rock music. He can be laugh-out-loud funny. Just listen to Jewish Princess or Bobby Brown Goes Down if you have any doubt. He is the antithesis of Political Correctness, much needed in these PC times.
He produced outstanding concept albums like Joe’s Garage. He is completely unsparing of evangelical religiosity, attacking its exponents with cruelly aimed barbs, often to hilarious effect. He created the greatest satire of mindless American conformism and submission to consumer culture ever written, I’m the Slime, yet he was also an extreme conservative and hated drugs. His targets were pretense, falsity, West Coast hippies and gay men, pseuds, religious evangelists and just about anyone he had in his crosshairs…
He is a great singer with a rich mocking baritone and a highly irritating falsetto. He is one of the world’s greatest rock guitarists, up there with Jimmy Page, Hendrix and the rest. He was disciplined, had a phenomenal work rate and was a perfectionist. He gave his musicians hell. Listen to the production values of the Hot Rats album, or any of the live albums. Who else had such astonishing productivity and variety in 26 years of artistic endeavor?
Finally he had a musical range unmatched by any other rock composer. He tried his hand at most genres within popular music, even country. He crossed over into jazz rock. Along with Chicago he created jazz rock. How many rock composers can you mention in the same breath as Karl Stockhausen and Edgar Varese? I still look forward to my first encounter with his last classical piece, Yellow Shark (1993).

The Incredible Shrinking Middle Class

22 statistics show that the American middle class is in bad shape and getting worse. Any reasonable Left party would do something to ameliorate these figures. Such a party is not the Democratic Party in the US. The Republican Party, of course, supports the bad guys on every one of the metrics below.

The Tea Party Movement is fake populism. On virtually every one of the metrics below, the Tea Partiers are with the plutocrats and against the have-nots. It’s “upper-middle class populism” except that such a thing is not really possible.

Actually, the Tea Partiers resemble a lot the petit bourgeois base that supported fascism in the 1920’s-1940’s in Europe. It’s important to note that in no European country did most of the workers support fascism. The blackshirts in Italy were formed in 1921. They ran through the cities and the countryside, smashing rural peasant and urban worker protests. The Brownshirts in Germany did much the same thing.

German workers never supported Nazism. They always supported either the Communist Party or the Social Democrats. It’s important to note also that the entire US media, as far as I can tell, supports the bad guys and opposes the middle class on every single metric below. That is because the media is owned by plutocrats.

• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
• 61 percent of Americans “always or usually” live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don’t contribute anything to retirement savings.
• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
• For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.
• In 1950, the ratio of the average executive’s paycheck to the average worker’s paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
• As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.
• The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.
• Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.
• In the United States, the average federal worker now earns 60% MORE than the average worker in the private sector.
• The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America’s corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
• In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.
• More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.
• For the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
• This is what American workers now must compete against: in China a garment worker makes approximately 86 cents an hour and in Cambodia a garment worker makes approximately 22 cents an hour.
• Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 – the highest rate in 20 years.
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
• The top 10 percent of Americans now earn around 50 percent of our national income.

A Therapy for the Narcissist

A commenter discusses the Chinese attitude of “don’t lose face.” This is an excellent philosophy.

Their motto is to try not to “lose face” and/or make other “lose face”.

This is actually my motto in dealing with other humans.

Some humans I just don’t respect very much for whatever reason.

But if forced to deal with them, I try to get down to their level and deal with them one and one. I even say stupid shit to myself like, “I’m so inferior. This person is so much better than me. I’m nothing, I’m a jerk, I’m a loser, I’m an idiot.” It sounds terrible, but I don’t really believe it, so it’s not harmful at all. But it goes over very well for some reason. When I walk around, I often act like the cock of the walk. But on one to one, I have to get down off my high horse, otherwise it just doesn’t work.

I would recommend this therapy to anyone struggling with narcissism. Problem is that deeply narcissistic individuals never think that they have a problem. I’ve never met a hardcore arrogant narcissist yet who tried to modify his behavior, tune down his assholery, and just be nice. Hardcore narcissists don’t get it. Like all personality disordered folks, they are clueless dolts.

I had a therapist once back in the 80’s. Real cool guy. He also had an ego, and you have to admire that. He was uninsultable. You could not insult him or put him down in any way. He was just too strong for that. He knew I had ego issues too, and he kind of liked that about me, since we were similar in that way. He told me once how he adjusted his behavior in dealing with folks he had to deal with. Some place he went to, he had to get past a receptionist. He told me that he didn’t like her. Why not? She smoked, and he hated smokers.

“So you get outside that (dislike/hatred)?” I asked.

“More than that!” He said. “I get underneath that!” He actually humbled himself to her all-superior greatness, if only just to get past the Receptionist Blockade.

All through the therapy (4 years) he kept telling me, “You need to learn to be an actor!” In other words, it doesn’t matter what you really think or feel, just make a good show of things.

I kind of got it, but I’m still not that good at it.

What Do the Chinese Think of Blacks?

Hacienda, a Korean nationalist commenter with an anti-White grudge, posts:

“all those groups seriously hate blacks”One thing whites HAVE to stop doing:

Stop trying to be the spokespeople for other races. How the f+ck do you know that Chinese REALLY hate blacks!

I have spent a lot of time around Japanese and Koreans. They seriously hate Blacks, way, way, way, way worse than Whites do. They are like how we used to be. It’s pretty much the same with the East Indians in the US. And I know for a fact it’s true about Hispanics. It’s not that these people hate Blacks and Whites don’t, it’s just that they are vastly more racist than we are anymore. US Whites have lost a lot of their anti-Black racism lately. Things are far different than they were 30 or even 20 years ago.

I recall that during Mao’s era, the Maoist regime used to send bright Africans to college in China. The Chinese male students would chase them down the streets threatening to beat them up and calling them monkeys.

Also, a number of Blacks came to a university town in China recently. As might be expected, they were great players and were quickly cleaning up with the Chinese girls. They would throw parties in their apartments. Only Black men allowed. Only Chinese women allowed. No Chinese men allowed.

The Chinese male students at the university staged a wild, violent riot over the Blacks “stealing Chinese women.” Things got so bad that the Chinese government moved the Black students out of the city.

I also heard one Chinese guy from the Bay Area say that he and every Chinese person he knew in the Bay Area despised Blacks. Turned out that a number of them had been victims of violent crime. In every single case, the Chinese person was victimized by a Black criminal. This was the genesis of their rage.

Those anecdotes, along with the fact that Chinese racial supremacism probably mirrors the Japanese and Korean varieties, lead me to think that Chinese are not too wild about Blacks.

Heck, Chinese don’t even like other Asians. They don’t even like non-Han Asiatics who are their fellow citizens in China. I have had them tell me that Chinese means “Han.” Anyone in China who is not Han is “not Chinese.” Implication is that they are inferior. Even the Cantonese Yue are considered to be barbarians. They are somewhat off the hook as they have been Hanized, but not totally.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

Why White Supremacists Are Not So Supremacist After All

Bay Area Guy, a White nationalist commenter, is all upset about what some useless overeducated Black women said on some pointless Black Screed Blog. His comments are in italics. Mine are below.

Reading one of Ankhesen Mie’s comments yesterday over at Abagond rubbed me the wrong way, and put me in a unusually angry and nasty racial mood.

Yeah I just read that dumb bitch’s comment. Excuse me, that dumb Black bitch’s comment. She hates me too, so don’t worry. Just like all those Blacks over at Abagond, she hates all Whites. These people are the enemy, but ultimately, they are not important. It’s as if a bunch of the neighborhood 7 year old’s just declared war on you.

Big deal. She’s a dumb cunt. Dumb cunts are dime a dozen. Hell, just driving around town for a day, you probably see hundreds of them. LOL!

Maybe I just need to ignore black anti-racists and radicals.

I do, pretty much. But then, I guess I’m a real White supremacist. Most of them aren’t real, they’re fakes. They don’t really feel superior, otherwise they would not get so enraged about the enemies all the time. Their White self-esteem is fragile and fake, like that of the narcissist. You see, I don’t think most White nationalists and White supremacists really feel superior. They’re just scared little boys and girls, shitting their pants at the big bad non-Whites. LOL!

Me? I’m not worried, at least not at the moment.

A secure person can take criticism. A secure person doesn’t go around worrying about his idiot enemies and critics all day. A secure person doesn’t have to pound his rivals to bring them down to his level. A secure person knows he’s better. Got it?

Who knows? Perhaps flesh and blood black people aren’t really like that.

LOL, they’re probably worse. But really, who cares what these silly bourgeois Blacks think? These are privileged Blacks who sit around all day stewing about how YT is “holding them down” and “keeping them back.” Their project is a beef with the White bourgeois on the grounds that the White bourgeois is not splitting up enough of the loot with the non-White bourgeois. It’s totally irrelevant to the rest of us, and all these Blacks like that are a bunch of tools.

See, when I read Ankieson Mie, Abagond and all those other silly bourgeois Blacks over there, I laugh at them. When they insult me, I nearly fall out of my chair. I mean, I’ve just been insulted by an inferior! Like I said, I am an actual White Supremacist. Normally, it’s in the background 99% of the time, but when any non-White of any type tries to insult me, I usually nearly die laughing. I’m always suddenly being insulted by an inferior.

Real working class Blacks are often pretty cool people. They’re too busy working and trying to survive to fret too much about YT. This Critical Race Theory/Political Correctness crap is a bourgeois indulgence for overeducated minorities who spent too much time studying nonsense theory in college.

Jewish Power in the US in the Clear Light of Reason

An anti-Semitic commenter writes:

As a leftist, you yourself should have plenty of reasons not to like the “Chosen”. For one thing, who’s responsible for the current financial catastrophe and looting of workers: Ben Shalom Bernanke, Lloyd Blankfein, Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin etc. Who’s responsible for pushing for a catastrophic war on Iran: AIPAC, Israel itself, various Jew neocons. Who’s trying to pass laws that would destroy freedom of speech and criminalize all criticisms of Jews and Israhell: ADL, various other Jew organizations.

This requires some analysis. The first part is simply absurd:

For one thing, who’s responsible for the current financial catastrophe and looting of workers: Ben Shalom Bernanke, Lloyd Blankfein, Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin etc.

This Socialism of Fools stuff is so lame. It’s not even analysis. It’s ridiculous. It lacks a proper class analysis.

Who’s responsible for pushing for a catastrophic war on Iran: AIPAC, Israel itself, various Jew neocons.

This is true, but also US imperialism wants to attack Iran too. And the US Sunni fascist buddies in the Arab World, especially the Saudis. The Saudis probably hate Iran more than the Jews do.

Who’s trying to pass laws that would destroy freedom of speech and criminalize all criticisms of Jews and Israhell: ADL, various other Jew organizations.

This much is correct, but it won’t go anywhere.

Also, you need to realize that there are 10’s of millions of US Gentiles who are 100% behind the Jews and the Israelis. Not because they have been forced to be, but because they really like them and they have formed an alliance with them voluntarily.

For instance, the US military and US imperialism has a deep alliance going with the Israelis dating back 25 years or so. It’s almost impossible to disentangle them now. It’s like Israel is almost an arm of the Pentagon or the Pentagon has an office in Tel Aviv. They’re like the same thing.

People need to get away from this “Jews whispering in the King’s ear” trope.

Gerald Kersh, Kickass British Noir Crime Novelist

I never knew there was such a thing as British crime noir fiction! Amazing. Gerald Kersh was said to be one Hell of a writer, but he’s almost completely forgotten.

From an early work, Night and the City, written in 1938 when he was only 27 years old. Centers around seedy London districts, mostly around Piccadilly Square. Characters are criminals, pimps, thieves, blackmailers, con artists, bar owners, gamblers, bookies, etc.

Check out this kickass noir crime novel prose:

“He had highly developed intuitions, proceeding from long and cumulative experience of the customs of the City. I have mentioned how he could appraise a footstep. He could, by a similar method of spontaneous reasoning, read a face, interpret an expression, calculate how much money you were in the habit of spending, or even decide by the look of you which restaurant or café you would probably frequent.

He saw London as a kind of Inferno – a series of concentric areas with Picadilly Circus as the ultimate center.”

“Bagrag’s Cellar is a dragnet through which the undercurrent of night life continually filters. It is choked with low organisms, pallid and distorted, unknown to the light of day, and not to be tolerated in healthy society . . . .

Half-exhausted people throw up spasms of febrile energy: they rise in groups without purpose, move round, then sink back again, like stirred-up filth on the bottom of a pond. . .To take a deep breath in Bagrag’s Cellar, now, is like inhaling the combined vapors of a distillery, a dosshouse, and a burning tobacco factory.”

“This woman had something about her that was indescribably terrifying.

Imagine the death mask of Julius Caesar, plastered with rouge, and stuck with a pair of eyes as small, as flat, and as bright as newly cut cross sections of .38-caliber bullets; marked with eyebrows that ran together in a straight black bar: and surmounted by a million diabolical black hairs that sprang in a nightmarish cascade up out of her skull, like a dark fountain of accumulated wickedness squeezed out by the pressure of her corsets.”

“Now, my precious; people love to see other people behaving like idiots, but not seeing themselves doing the same thing. No mirrors except in the lavatories, and there we’re going to have pink mirrors, see?. . .They mustn’t see ’emselves in their true colors, my love. When they go out to be sick, let ’em look as if they’re having a good time.”

“Vi yawned, and from between her pale, painted lips there proceeded a breath such as might come from a pathological specimen in a jar, when the alcohol is evaporating. . . Her head against the pillow was a study in all the indefinable pale colors of debauch.

The pillow case was gray, but Vi’s face was grayer, tinged with the chlorotic greeny-yellow of anemia. Rubbed smears of yesterday’s rouge gave emphasis to this pallor. Under the laid-on red, her lips were pale pink, and her teeth appeared yellow in the daylight.

The penciled lines of her eyebrows had been rubbed off on to the blanket; the metallic green paint with which she colored her eyelids had become mixed with the blue mascara of her lashes, in an unearthly and poisonous bruise color picked out with flecks of silver. This was trickling down into the hollows of her eyes. One of her false eyelashes had come loose, and swung precariously against her cheek as she blinked. She seemed to be liquefying, falling to pieces.”

“Every film he had ever seen, and every book he had ever read, rushed together in his brain to form one blazing and magnificent composite, in which he, Fabian, fantastically enlarged, fantastically dressed, leaned backwards in a wild photomontage of champagne bubbles, limousines, diamonds, galloping horses, baize tables, and beautiful women; all whirling and weaving in a deluge of white and yellow chips, and large bank notes; an eternal reduplication of breasts and legs of very conceivable shape, size, and color.”

“What was it? Was it that, for the first time in his life, he had become aware of the appalling burden of accumulating lies with which he loaded his soul from hour to hour–the closing coils of deceit which he spun about himself day after day?

There passed through his mind a vision of life free from vanity, fiction, and subterfuge. . .a bygone period in his life when black was black and white was white; when one sinned, and confessed, and breathed again. ‘Why do I always have to start these tales? They aren’t necessary!’ he said to himself.”

Trollope?

The critical view of Trollope is that he has not aged well, and was never much of a novelist to start with, lacking much talent other than logorrhea. His books were huge sellers in the Victorian Era, and some other writers even praised him. But he has not weathered well with time with critics.

Nevertheless, he is still very widely read for a guy who wrote 150 years ago. He’s nearly as widely read as Dickens. And his modern day fans love him to bits.

So what’s the verdict? Does he suck or is he cool?

Water is the Enemy of Wood

Your commonsense housekeeping lesson for today.

From? My Mom. Who else?

Meaning: Water and wood do not play well together. Keep the water off the wood. Don’t clean wood with water, or if you do, wipe it up right away. Water rots wood.

There are some new surfaces, though, that are more or less impermeable due to such a hard finish that it’s almost like the surface has a plastic layer on it.

Why Are Only White Populaces, Regions and Countries in Need of Diversity?

In the comments to the post Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone!, tulio says:

My point Robert is that mass migrations of one race displacing another race has always been happening. For much of the last 500 years it was whites displacing non-whites off their land. The resources of the Americas, Africa and Asia were used to make Europe wealthy and give it a big economic boost above others. Now these white countries are the wealthiest so they attract economic refugees.

These Indians moving to England aren’t moving there because they want to. Think about it, who wants to move to the other side of the planet where they are going to basically be aliens? They’re simply going out of economic necessity.

Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled. It’s just push-pull economics. Not some grandiose “non-white” conspiracy to eradicate the white genotype. If Europe was poor and China was rich, you’d see whites going to China looking for jobs. People follow the money, it’s just that simple.

First of all, bad example. The Indians moving to the US are the middle class and upper middle class. They are on the high end of Indian society, and they live extremely well for Indians. They only come here because they can live better here, and their country is a shithole, mostly because they have turned it into one. So they are not moving here out of any economic necessity. They just want to move up in the world.

The examples tulio used you previously used were of invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides.

It’s frankly stunning that he compares “invasions, conquests, settler-colonization projects, ethnic cleansings and even genocides” to the mass migration to White lands. It implies that possibly this is what is occurring in White countries. It also implies that the mass migrations to White countries are not a good thing.

Sure, people follow the money. OK, then why is the 3rd World not flooding into Taiwan, South Korea and Japan? Why do the Western elites and Leftists not demand that Taiwan, South Korea and Japan open up their borders to diversity and mass invasion displacing their cultures and genepools? They only demand this for White countries.

It’s only White countries that need diversity! Now why is that?

We also see many articles in the US press about certain US cities, towns and regions that are “too White.” These places are said to be in need of diversity. How come Detroit doesn’t need diversity? How come Bell, California and Monterey Park, California don’t need diversity? Why do only White populaces and regions need diversity? The critics are not answering the question.

Add to that the fact that whites reproduce below replacement level and you have jobs to be filled.

This is another one of the lies of the Diversitoids, that White countries are not making enough babies, so they have to experience 3rd World Nile-like floods every year. Otherwise…otherwise what? The sky will fall? There are no labor shortages in White countries. Certainly not in the White country that I live in. In the US, the low birth rate is not a problem that needs mass immigration to be remedied. The low White birth rate here is not creating some horrible labor shortage that can only be fixed by having Calcutta crash through the gates.

I think there are several things going on here:

1. Anti-White grudge politics. Most non-Whites don’t like Whites too much. They think we stole all of our money and got it through exploiting them and the people of the 3rd World. In many cases, they say that we invaded their countries and subjugated them. So turnabout is fair play. Since Whites invaded, conquered, colonized, genocided and exploited non-White lands, non-Whites get to do it right back to us as revenge. There can be no other explanation for this mindset.

2. The notion that White lands do not deserve their wealth. Supposedly we stole it, and non-Whites demand that we share it with them in the interests of fairness. But Marx never said that the way to make revolution was for the poor countries to invade the rich countries.

3. The notion that White countries are automatically racist and possibly White Supremacist/Nazi. Most non-Whites and even Jews have been fucked over by Whites at some point in the past. They see a White country, and they think crackers or Nazis. The best way to reduce the crackerness or Nazitude of the place is to mass invade it with non-Whites.

Jews in particular have this worry. A top Jewish figure in the US commented on the declining White percentage in the US and the projection that US Whites will dip below 50% in 2050. “At that point the project will be complete,” he said. “Then, we will never have to worry about the possibility of a White Supremacist Nazi state arising in America again.” The Jewish mindset here is “Never again.” No more White countries = no more possible Nazi states.

4. Naivete. Blacks in particular think that White countries suck because “we be all raciss and shit.” They think by diluting the White population and turning White countries into Brazil or something, things will get better for Blacks. But that’s dubious. We Whites have been pretty nice lately. If Blacks think Whites are bad, Blacks should wait until they have to deal with Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Latin Americans, or East Indians. Living under White rule will seem like paradise.

All of this suggests to be that non-Whites are not our allies on the question of immigration to White countries. They are always going to support mass immigration to White lands for one of the reasons above, which makes you wonder why we should even let them in in the first place.

The Problem with “White Countries for Everyone”

In the comments section for the Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone! post, Erranter, a new commenter who is one of my smartest commenter, writes:

So, what can you do?

I really doubt my Numbers USA faxes have had much effect.

In fact, I’m beginning to accept the fact that “diversity is the future”. It won’t be all that bad. I look around at kids and see all colors playing together like never before. Sure, the multiculturalist philosophy has infiltrated our schools and brought a great deal of mediocrity, but without the myth of racial equality, wouldn’t there just be continuous conflict?

It seems necessary at this point, especially in CA where over half our population is non-white. I mean, you can’t tell 12 yr old that certain ones of them have higher IQs. And I’m not about to start deporting people en mass. I’d just like to see a drastic decrease in immigration, and mostly for population stabilization and not white preservation.

Sure, the average might go down a little bit but I never had much in common with the average and there will still be smart people here and there. Might be a little bit rarer, but oh well. We don’t breed. It’s our fault. It’s not like they’re doing anything wrong by being dumb. They can still be moral, helpful people, so long as they’re educated.

I mainly fear that the tribe will take over and all smart people will be taken out of positions of power due to excessive affirmative action in govt. Now that would be a disaster. As long as we have wise leadership we can get by. Human history is just getting by anyway. There’s always new problems.

Also, white American culture has shot itself in the foot because it readily has given up its culture and heritage for the sake of materialism and money. It’s not like people are listening to Bach and Beethoven and discussing Schopenhauer and Descartes in these little all-white towns. They might be quainter and cleaner than New York, but they tend to be culturally bankrupt and prefer it that way. Urbanity is hypocritical but it offers you a wider view of life.

This is probably just a typical liberal argument. Suffice it to say I still get pissed off driving through Oakland, Stockton, Richmond . . . (I could go on) and any other urban hellhole brought about by stupid, unrealistic policy.

As far as deporting people, the illegals have to go. I’m not interested in deporting anyone else.

The reason for the title is the hypocrisy of it all. The White elites, and of course, the rest of the world, have decided that White countries, and only White countries, need to be mass-invaded by non-Whites for a variety of reasons. Diversity, anti-racism, bla bla. But it’s only White countries that need to be mass-invaded by non-Whites in the name of diversity and anti-racism. Nowhere else on Earth is this invasion necessary. Only in White countries. What’s up with that?

The tipping point in Detroit was 20% Black. All the way up to 20% Black, things were quite manageable in Detroit. The crime rate only increased a bit at 10% Black. Even at 20% Black, it was not much higher. But after 20% Black, the crime rate simply exploded exponentially. It’s reasonable to assume that Detroit had a carrying capacity of 20% Black and not much more.

This goes along with my philosophy of, “A Black a block. Spread em out and civilize em!” Mass concentrations of large numbers of Blacks in the US do not seem to be a good idea either for Blacks or for anyone else. Black culture in all its worst aspects takes over and the place goes to shit.

I don’t mind a little diversity. After all, I grew up in a California that was 20-30% non-White. To me, that was “normal.” It was not objectionable in any way. But now I live in a California that is 58% non-White. Whole new ballgame, and I don’t like it. A simple doubling of that minority % made all the difference in the world. Further, I enjoyed being a majority. Going from a majority to a minority is one Hell of a shitty feeling. It’s understandable that any humans would resist that.

Right now, I drive through town after town that looks and feels like it is a part of Mexico. There is a part of Los Angeles stretching for miles that looks and feels like San Salvador. In the San Gabriel Valley, you can drive for what seems like 10-20 miles through what looks like Taipei or Hong Kong. Most places in the world that look like downtown L.A. require a passport to get into them.

Here in California, we’ve always had immigration. The Mexicans, Blacks, Latin Americans, Samoans, East Indians, Filipinos, and Chinese are an integral part of this state. They’ve been here from the very start, or maybe 20-70 years afterwards. They’re part of the neighborhood. But for most of my lifetime, the immigration did not come in floods. I could go back to 300-400,000 legal immigrants a year no problem.

On the other hand, mass immigration to California, legal and illegal, has quite simply gone insane. It feels like we’ve been hit by a non-White foreigner tidal wave here. We never voted on this. No one ever asked our opinion on whether we wanted to be Foreigner Tsunamied or not. If put to a vote, most of us would have voted against it. We California Whites got race-replaced in our own homeland. Try it sometime. It doesn’t feel so good. Not only that, but the race replacement of California Whites has not led to a better California. Instead, it’s fucked up the whole state.

Many Blacks speak out in favor of turning the US into the United Nations. I’d like to ask them, “What exactly is in this for you?” How are you benefitting from the US being turned into a living zoo of Homo Sapiens? And I’d like to point out that we US Whites have been better to you Blacks than any of these immigrants replacing us will be.

Jews Are Not the Problem

A commenter asks:

Robert, you claimed that anti-Semitism on the Maury2K blog was disturbing to you. As a leftist, ask yourself this question: what have Jews done for workers and the left in recent years, I mean other than pushing for more wars in the Middle East and promoting neoliberal economics.

National Bolshevik retarded anti-Semitism is indeed disturbing to me, and the more I read it, the less I like it. If this is socialism, it’s the Socialism of Fools:

Trotsky was a Jew. The defeat of Trotsky by Stalin was the defeat of Jewish plutocracy by Stalin’s workers revolution. Why was Trotsky a “plutocrat?” Because he was a Jew, dontcha know?

Retarded.

Why are Jews not the enemy?

Simple, the Jews as a voting group are the most liberal and progressive group in the US. If you look at the US liberal-Left, it’s full of Jews. I was on the Left for many years. The Communist Party USA is Jews from top to bottom. So are the Greens and other Left parties. Jews completely dominate the entire US Left, and your average US Jewish voter is the most progressive voter in the US.

Jews lead movements. Sure, a few promote neoliberalism, but neoliberalism is simply what is promoted by the entire US capitalist class, 98% of which is non-Jewish. Blaming Jews for neoliberalism is the Socialism of Fools! Wars in the Middle East? Well, it’s unfortunate, but the truth is that We Are All Jews now.

The US Gentiles support Israel and wars in the Middle East. Bush and Cheney knew what they were doing. No Jews secretly pushed them into war. They wanted war with Saddam going back years, but for reasons of US imperialism for the most part. Israel was a side issue, and Bush and Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al, could give a flying fuck about Saddam’s threat to Israel.

The entire US Republican Party is pro-Israel. And it’s not because Jews force them into this. It’s ideological. US conservatism at the moment is fanatically pro-Zionist. That is its ideological nature, and it has little to do with US internal politics, since Jews don’t vote Republican anyway.

Israel is a settler-colonial and imperialist state that is allied with US imperialism. As promoters of US imperialism, the Republican Party is deeply allied with Israel. Plus they see Israelis as Western Judeo-Christians in a sea of evil Muslims, so they support them on that basis  – the US Republican Party is now deeply Christian fundamentalist on an ideological level.

As far as the Democratic Party and Israel, the Democratic Party under Obama is the most anti-Israel Administration since Nixon 1972-1974. And it’s led by Jews. A Jew, Rahm Emanuel, is leading the anti-Israel charge with this Administration.

US Jewry is tiring of Israel’s crap. The gap between US Jewish liberalism, anti-racism and multiculturalism and Israeli Jewish fascism is becoming too wide to bridge. Israel’s bullshit is endangering US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

US Jews are not so dual loyalist as you think. They are loyal to the Jews, sure, but only up to a point. First and foremost, most US Jews are Americans and American patriots. A liberal and progressive Israel would win their loyalty, but Israeli fascism is getting too blatant these days. Hence US Jews are cutting the strings of their aprons to Israel.

What is Cultural Marxism?

This is a question that requires a long answer. This is as good an answer as any.

Abagond and the whole crowd over at his site = Cultural Marxism. Tim Wise, Robert Jensen, that whole crowd, that’s Cultural Marxism. Idiot radical feminists who hate men, that’s Cultural Marxism. Hispanic Aztlan revanchist shitheads are Cultural Marxists. Afrocentrist dumbasses wailing against Whitey, that’s Cultural Marxism. Radical queers pushing extreme pro-gay lunatic politics, that’s Cultural Marxism.

The Cultural Marxists pushed Identity Politics in the 1960’s. The result was the retarded division of White men from White women, White workers from Black and Hispanic workers, straight workers from gay workers, and all sorts of idiotic bullshit. Divide the workers, you know. The game the Right always does.

Except this time it was “Left” retards doing it. It defined Whites and males as the enemy, and Whites and males acted as you might expect: they fled from it like smoke from a burning building. Straight into the arms of the enemy, the Right. But the Left gave them this shove, or kick in the butt, in the first place.

That’s what it is, in a nutshell. Personally, I think it sucks, but that’s just me. It all goes back to Herbert Marcuse in the 1960′s. Originally it was a Left philosophy, so it was sort of ok in a way, but now it’s been taken over by bourgeois characters, mostly Black and Hispanic bourgeois who are not really Left people and often push rightwing economics. They just use it as grudge politics to try to get a bigger share of the loot for their bourgeois ethnic group, and a grudge against the bourgeois Whites supposedly not being nice enough to the Black, Hispanic, etc. bourgeois.

At worst, it is simply bullshit anti-White politics for the bourgeois of any race:

Whites are evil, Whites are evil, Whites are evil, Whites are evil, Whites are evil, Whites need to give up stuff, Whites need to give up stuff, Whites need to give up stuff, Whites need to give up stuff, Whites need to give up stuff.

Combine that with rightwing neoliberal multinational corporate capitalism. Mystery Shit Anti-White Worker Casserole!

There is absolutely nothing whatsoever here for any White worker. It fucks him when he walks in and fucks him again when he walks out. No one wonder it sells to White workers as fast as turd cupcakes. White workers are not as stupid as you think.

There’s nothing progressive about this politics!

Anti-White propaganda + neoliberal corporate multinational, multicultural, invite the world politics does not benefit White workers in any way, shape or form!

National Bolshevik Blog

Maury2K’s blog.

Worth a look. I hate to say it, but this is somewhat up my alley. I don’t like NB’s at all. They’re a bunch of racist and ultranationalist expansionist shits. Nonetheless, this Maury2K guy is one of the most reasonable I have found yet.* Good articles on how the Western Left has mega-fucked up.

I will vote Republican only over my dead body. You will literally have to kill me first. I can’t imagine any situation in which I would vote Republican. Bottom line is I end up voting Dem most of the time. Sometimes I vote Left, like Green or Socialist, just as a protest vote, if I think the election is a done deal.

Even though these National Bolsheviks are racist fucks, they are socialists and on the Left, and I would much rather ally with them than with these traitor invite the world, invade the world Democrats. The Western Left is hopeless and frankly, pure evil. It’s 100% Open Borders. In my part of the US, them’s fighting words.

Politics is the art of compromise, as my late father used to say. Your allies are typically the lesser of two evils.

*I have some worries on this site, such as his position on civil rights and what looks like some anti-Semitism, but I’ll swallow that pill over the Western Left Open Borders White race traitor horse pill any day.

What Is There About That Word?

Redundant.

Isn’t that a funny word? There is something weird about that word. Something very strange about it. When I say it, it is like this strange force comes over, almost like a trance or a spell.

I want to say it over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over over and over and over.

Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, White Countries for Everyone!

There, I said it.

Read and discuss. Form small groups of four to five by pushing your tables together. Choose one person as leader, another as recorder. Come up with an analysis by the end of class. We will call on you to read aloud your answers. Take careful notes. There will be a quiz on Monday, so be prepared.

Men, Race, Masculinity Scales and Women’s Sexual Choices

In the comments section, people are arguing about whether Asian men are masculine or not. It all depends on your perspective, and masculinity ain’t all it’s cracked up to be anyway.

All other things being equal, the society with the most masculinized males will be seriously violent, unfair and uncivilized.

The society with the less masculinized males (within reason) will get along very smoothly, function very well, have high levels of wealth, trust and empathy, place emphasis on fairness, have low rates of crime and social pathology: in short, these will be the most civilized societies on Earth.

But a woman is a Cavewoman, and when looking for mates, she’s not necessarily looking for Mr. Civilization.

Let’s get real here for a second. Now, in my 20’s, I spent a lot of time with Asians at USC in the teaching program, then teaching in schools in Gardena, Koreatown and Orange Country, so I know them very well. The older generation of Japanese and Korean men always struck me as very macho.

Don’t know about the younger guys. They aren’t exactly wimpy. More like nerdy. But they aren’t feminine or effeminate. They’re just these somewhat uptight/nerdy squares. One thing I can tell you is Japanese guys seriously hate queers! They really, really, really hate them.

I had a best friend who was Japanese, and he had problems with women. Mostly he was shy. His older brother could not get laid if God himself decreed it. He would go to these bars in LA where you pay the chicks a lot of money just so they will dance with you and talk to you. That’s how hard up he was.

Even in Gardena, I noticed that the older Japanese men were super macho, but the younger guys were these nerdy office worker types. I would go out to eat in all-Japanese restaurants and some of the Japanese women in there would do the Stepford Wives hypnotized look thing. I still don’t understand what it is with Asian women and White guys. The best of us have some kind of power of them.

All that aside, let’s get real. Let’s line the 3 races of men together here in the US:

1. Asian men.
2. White men.
3. Black men.

1. Least masculine.
2. In between.
3. Most masculine.*

*The scale is exactly the opposite for females and femininity, but that’s another post. Think about it.

Now, not saying that low masculinity is all that bad, I mean I got a Master’s Degree and I’m a hermit / egghead who sits around and reads books all the time. On top of that, lots of people think I’m gay or bi. So no offense Asian guys.

Asian men’s quite decent and civilized behavior is due to lower masculinity.

Black men’s extremely uncivilized and indecent behavior is due to their extreme masculinity. Look at the imprisonment/woman abuse, etc. rates.

However, women are Cavewomen when it comes to sex. She will choose a guy who seems more masculine. Hence, White women go for Black men and call us pussies, wimps and fags. Asian women in a society with White and Black men will see Asian men as too feminine and go for White guys instead. Black men will be so masculine that most Asian women will see them as some kind of animals from a jungle, totally uncivilized beasts.

A woman wants a man who is *somewhat* more masculine, but not so much that he’s a fuckin’ animal. A White man is perfect for an Asian woman. Somewhat more masculine than Asian guys, treats them better, yet low enough in masculinity as to be quite civilized.