Anti-White Hate Propaganda on a British Talk Show

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kkXogn8Oeo]

That video is really pissing me off. It’s a British talk show about White women who are with Black guys. They interview a bunch of White women who prefer Black guys to White men. The Black guys, as a rule, are the well-behaved types that my friends and I call “White Blacks” – i.e., they act like White people.

We learn so many fascinating facts from these silly dames.

Black men are better in bed than White men. White men are lousy in bed. WTH?

Black men treat women better than White men. I can tell you right off that in my experience, that is not true.

Also notice at the end of the video, the one White woman who says she would not date a Black man, in fact – if he was the last man on Earth even – notice the propaganda here. They interviewed five White women who prefer Black men to White men, and one White woman who felt the opposite way; if you’re a moron, which most people are, the logical conclusion is that 85% of White women prefer Black men to men of their own race. Why? Because Black men are superior!

Also notice how the “White Black” guy argues with the White woman who refuses to date Blacks and implies that she is a racist for having this opinion. Utterly sickening.

But this is what Black men and boys always do. In schools where there are many Blacks and Whites, this is the line the hyper-sexually aggressive Black boys use with the White girls. If the girl says she won’t go out with them, they badger and badger her about it, endlessly accusing her of being racist. After all, the only reason she could resist his irresistible Black Big Cock Godliness is racism, right?

Sadly, many White women are weak and stupid, and Cultural Marxism worsens these problems, so this lame line – “You won’t date me because I’m racist!” – actually works, incredibly enough.

I’m shocked that Black males would stoop so low as to use this line. If a Black woman would not go out with me, I would hardly accuse her of being racist! How rude can you get? I was brought in a civilized, mannered, White middle class environment, and a lot of stuff is just beyond the pale rude. Especially calling someone racist because they won’t date your sorry ass. How pitiful can you get?

I have known many White women who had relationships with Black men. Some even preferred Black guys. In the case of every single woman where they had a kid, the Black man had taken off, nowhere to be seen.

This is the typical scene. Single White or Hispanic Mom, or she has a new guy. The Black guy made one or more kids with her, then he took off. If you ask the child, he’s either mad at or indifferent to his absent Black father. Ask the woman, and the father is nowhere to be seen. He’s vanished from the Earth, takes no interest in his offspring.

In addition, the Black men were far more likely than White men to abuse, verbally and physically, imprison, browbeat, keep at home, rape, rob, steal from, and of course cheat on the White woman. I can’t think of one single case where the guy did not do at least one of these things. What I have seen, Black men treat White women appallingly worse than White men do.

Are there cases that are not like this? I assume so, just never met any. If I knew a White woman who was involved with a Black guy and thinking of marrying or having kids with him, I would recommend that she not do that. As evidence, I would cite the experience of the women I know who had relationships with Black men.

Was the sex great? Who knows, maybe it was. Did they treat these women better than White guys? Are you kidding? For White women, Black men may well be a fun ride for a bit. As far as marrying them or having kids with them, the odds are not on your side.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

328 thoughts on “Anti-White Hate Propaganda on a British Talk Show”

  1. Hey Robert, northern Asians at least have been the most fierce and brutal warriors of all time, Mongols, Huns, Turkics, at a time we even conquered all the way up to Poland. In WWII, Japan lost but still held its own fiercely against the Yanks. I don’t think you can say Mongoloids are a wimpy race. Koreans, Mongols, northern Chinese etc. are NOT physically small. Koreans are bigger than a lot of Mediterranean Euros such as Sicilians and Greeks. I’ve seen em all in NYC so you cant tell me shit.

  2. I know personally of many Asian male/white female pairings, although not as many as the opposite. And most Asian guys I know are perfectly capable of getting attractive Asian women. Maybe it’s something about you, Anon. In my experience there are a lot more white guys in your situation than Asians. Most of them tend to be socially inept. Often they go for mail order brides from the former Soviet countries. You might try that, but you need a lot of money.

    1. What do you know about my situation? I was talking from a general perspective from a tribal point of view, not my personal situation.

  3. Since when did I say I was without a girl? Your suggestion about Thailand means that you think I’m in that situation, which I’m not. What the fuck are you trying to say? I’m an Asian tribalist, so I care about how other peoples in my tribe are doing. I wasn’t speaking about myself. Given your name, you should be no stranger to tribalism.

      1. I couldn’t really tell if you were being snide or not. If you were just trying to help, like I said I have a girlfriend and I’m sorry for overreacting.

  4. Hey Robert, who the fuck is Mort Goldman? Apparently he’s a character from Family Guy who’s a pharmacist, and you introduced him once as a pharmacist. Why does a real person have the same name and occupation as a fictional character? That’s creepy.

    1. It creeped me out too at first, and I wasn’t too pleased w/ the way the character was portrayed. Anytime I meet someone in that 18-35 age group, I’m guaranteed to get a comment or joke about it. I’ve pretty much heard them all.

      I wonder if I did something to piss Seth McFarland off before he was famous, though. Ironically, I’m a huge fan of the show.

  5. Saw my name while perusing this blog (it was linked from abagond’s), so I had to respond.

    Bay Area Guy,

    “Hey Robert, don’t you also find it amusing the way many of the black female commenters at Abagond (Natasha, Jasmin, Erzulieredeyes before she was banned, and others) happen to be with white guys?

    They frequently criticize and disparage whites, and yet they’re intimately involved with white guys.”

    A few things come to my mind while reading this:

    (1) You sure pay a lot of attention to what goes on at abagond’s. I find that interesting.

    (2) My criticism of the racism of some whites is not in contradiction to my relationship. In fact, I frequently have the same discussions I have at abagond’s, with my SO. No, he isn’t riddled with “white guilt,” he is just not blind to the racism that some whites exhibit.

    (3) I critique everyone, including blacks. Since you lurk abagond’s blog, I’m sure you’re aware of this. Yet you aren’t pointing this out as being misaligned with my personal life.

    Alpha Unit,

    “I can’t say I know these women, but it seems to me that they are criticizing White racism. Criticizing White racism doesn’t make someone a hater of White people, does it?”

    No it doesn’t and thank you; that was my point exactly.

    1. You criticize blacks?

      That’s news to me.

      The only time you criticize them is when they’re acting like house negroes. To the extent that you criticize them, it’s only because they’re not anti-racist and pro-black enough.

      So basically, your criticism of J falls along this line, for supposedly being a lover of white women. Same with your criticism of FG.

      But yes, if you do happen to criticize blacks whenever they say dogmatic and foolish things (and not just those blacks who you think are sucking up to whites), please let me know.

      By the way, I’ve already explained why I left Abagond. Of course, I used to comment there, but got branded a “white supremacist” by you of all people.

      Basically, I learned over there that the only way not to piss blacks off is to sit down, shut up, and unquestioningly agree with everything they say.

      Even Thaddeus, a thoughtful thinker who is hardly pro-white like I am, frequently gets attacked for being a clueless white guy, an apologist for racism, etc.

      There’s just no way to win with you guys.

  6. FG,

    “Not so paradoxical really. Their dislike of whites is rooted in envy…I stand by my assessment of Natasha and Jasmin. “

    You really wish, don’t you? Don’t you?

    It’s so simple-minded of people to come to the conclusion that criticizing someone else means the person is envious. All this “haterade” nonsense, is just that.

    I don’t how you came to the conclusion that I am envious of white people: persons that I live with, talk to, and am set to be engaged to, but accurate it is not.

    However, I’m totally convinced you are into scoring points with whites and are convinced of their superiority, that why you make these kinds of comments. Ask me how I reached that conclusion: I’ll be glad to inform you.

    1. And Natasha, you might not think that you being with a white man is contradictory (since he’s supposedly not blind like the rest of us wicked whites), but it does make one wonder.

      When you go around criticizing FG and J as lovers and defenders of white women despite being with a white man yourself, it does raise eyebrows, and rightfully so.

    2. I’m not “into scoring points with whites.” First, I am white. Creolized white, but white nonetheless. Second, I come to the defense of my ethnic group when it’s being unfairly maligned. For example, Abagond posted a study showing whites are less empathetic to the pain of non-whites than they are to that of other whites. He claimed this as evidence that whites are cold-hearted. Then a study came out showing that black Italians also empathize better with other blacks. All I did was post a link to it and point out that it indicates whites are not necessarily any mroe racist in this regard than other groups.

      1. You are white? Then why do you call yourself “mixed” or “biracial,” and why did you claim that your father was black?

        The internetz is tricky business: you never know who is behind the screen.

        1. Right, which is why you posted a photo of a young 6 year old looking white child and then bragged to everyone that he is your Significant other when we was little.

          LOL I’m one of the lurkers at abagond’s site and read there regularly to see some of the foolishness. I saw that post you made.

          You are clearly one of these sad black bitches that goes around claiming to have a white man just so you can feel special!

          You never know who’s behind the screen, RIGHT and YOU don’t show your face and we don’t know who you are!

          So who are you to question the identity of these commenters here when you don’t identify yourself?

          You showed a pic of a white child and then said that its your significant other!

          That could be anybody or you could be some sick pedophile collecting photos of kids!

          You’re an ignorant loud mouth and you’ve done nothing but be rude and disrespectful to these commenters here.

          I’m not like idiots like yourself, I read between the lines and I listen before I speak.
          And after reading abagond’s stuff and the idiocy from people like YOU,
          I will never comment on abagond’s blog because he is clearly anti-white, very hateful towards white women and he only allows people that agree with him to post.
          Bans anyone that doesn’t agree with him or kiss his ass and labels them a troll.

          As a white person I have more respect for people like Rob here, who stands up for his race and speaks his mind with an open forum.

          Don’t throw around claims of others being white supremacists just because they love their people, when you are clearly one yourself, lusting after white men! LOL

        2. To be fair to Abagond, he doesn’t ban people or censor them simply for disagreeing with him.

          He allowed No Slappz, The Great White Man, Alan, and other white trolls to lurk around for a while. He only banned them because they violated the comments policy. Of course, you could argue that he was more willing to ban them on account of ideological differences, since almost everyone’s broken the comments policy at one point.

          But still, to his credit, he does allow dissenting opinions.

          I’m not a defender or lover of Abagond in any way, but what you’re saying isn’t entirely fair.

  7. Alpha Unit,

    “Bay Area Guy, is there some reason you won’t take your complaints against Abagond and his commenters directly to them?”

    I wondered the same thing. This whole string of conversation about commenters at abagond’s is reminiscent of high school gossip, and quite cowardly.

    Bay Area Guy,

    “However, that doesn’t mean I’m going to put up with his crap. Same thing applies to online discussions with the Abagond types. I understand where they come from, but I’m not going to accept them and put up with their crap. I’m also going to point out their inconsistencies and insatiable demands. “

    Yup, you’re only going to rant about it on another blog where they will probably never see it — that’s your way of pointing out their “inconsistencies and insatiable demands.” (I find that last point to be deliciously ironic given your comments here, but no matter)

    “I’m not about to go over there and stir up a hornets nest with my comments. I’m just not in the mood for another shouting match.

    Would you rather I go over there and tell them straight up that they’re full of shit?”

    Yes, tell us all the shit that we’re full of; it would make an interesting read.

    1. High school gossip?!

      Whatever, Natasha. I’m not about to be lectured on my supposed cowardliness by some hypocrite afflicted with jungle fever.

      It’s hardly cowardly. I just made a promise, and intend to keep it. Besides, if they want to challenge me, they’re free to come here, as you have done.

      And no, I’m not making any demands. I’m simply providing my own commentary on race and pointing out absurdities. I’m not asking any of them to kiss my ass.

      But yes, Natasha, you are full of shit and cannot rise above childish insults.

      Happy now?

      Or would you like me to paste this on Abagond’s site and bold it for everyone to see?

      By the way, how the hell did you even find this website? You just go around looking for those that talk shit about you?

      Have a nice day.

        1. It’s a term coined by Spike Lee, which basically says that someone is attracted to another person for racial reasons.

          For example, a white guy who loves black women, and vice versa, would be examples of people who have jungle fever.

          It’s a great film, by the way.

  8. Bay Area Guy,

    “You criticize blacks?

    That’s news to me. “

    Right, I forgot: you only pay attention to the “bad things” that are said about whites, but not what is said about others, or even the neutral/good statements that are made in regards to whites.

    “The only time you criticize them is when they’re acting like house negroes. To the extent that you criticize them, it’s only because they’re not anti-racist and pro-black enough. “

    You’ve totally mischaracterized my position,. blowing it completely out of proportion. I see you’re still fond of doing that.

    I definitely do criticize the “house negroes,” but they aren’t the only ones I criticize., by far.

    “By the way, I’ve already explained why I left Abagond. Of course, I used to comment there, but got branded a “white supremacist” by you of all people. “

    You are a white supremacist. You believe that whites are superior and you stated as much at abagond’s. Why is this hard to comprehend? Or have your views changed?

    I won’t speak of those that are not here to defend themselves (J, Thaddeus, etc), but I will say that I never called Thaddeus a white apologist, because I don’t think he is. Maybe someone else said that; who knows. But I didn’t, so I don’t see why you’re addressing that with me.

    “And Natasha, you might not think that you being with a white man is contradictory (since he’s supposedly not blind like the rest of us wicked whites), but it does make one wonder.

    When you go around criticizing FG and J as lovers and defenders of white women despite being with a white man yourself, it does raise eyebrows, and rightfully so.”

    I call people defenders of white women (or anything else) if that’s what I believe they are based on all the evidence given. That is not contradictory to my relationship because I’m not a defender of white men, as an abstract concept. As you well know.

    “Whatever, Natasha. I’m not about to be lectured on my supposed cowardliness by some hypocrite afflicted with jungle fever. “

    You’re a fan of ad hominems, eh? 😉

    As you may know, I’m a fan myself when it suits, but I’m trying to be on my best behavior here. But this is the kind of irony I mean:

    “But yes, Natasha, you are full of shit and cannot rise above childish insults. “

    You take a shot at me saying I have “jungle fever,” and then accuse me of not rising above childish insults? Smells like the inconsistency that you so loathe.

    “By the way, how the hell did you even find this website? You just go around looking for those that talk shit about you?”

    Like I said above (and you didn’t read): this blog was linked from abagond’s , in regards to an unrelated issue.

    1. Right, I forgot: you only pay attention to the “bad things” that are said about whites, but not what is said about others, or even the neutral/good statements that are made in regards to whites.

      Gee, I don’t know, maybe it’s because only bad things are said about whites. I have yet to see someone make a critical remark about blacks or neutral remark about whites who doesn’t get viciously attacked.

      Maybe I missed it, but I haven’t exactly seen statements to the contrary.

      You are a white supremacist. You believe that whites are superior and you stated as much at abagond’s. Why is this hard to comprehend? Or have your views changed?

      I’ve come to realize that a “white supremacist” is simply a white person who is:

      1. White
      2. Proud to be white.
      3. Is more likely to favor his own group.
      4. Harbors prejudice against other groups.

      These are all perfectly natural positions. Being pro-white, and explaining why I’m pro-white (which is what I actually did at Abagond) hardly means that I think my group is innately superior.

      I do recall also saying that blacks and other groups should be proud of their groups.

      But no, being pro-white and extolling the virtues of my people and their achievements is a far cry from the hatemonger/Jim Crow racist that the charge of “white supremacist” implies.

      You take a shot at me saying I have “jungle fever,” and then accuse me of not rising above childish insults? Smells like the inconsistency that you so loathe.

      Okay, you win. That was uncalled for. I guess we both like ad hominems then 🙂

      But yes, Natasha, if you can show me instances where you’ve said neutral or good things about whites and critical things about blacks, please do so.

      Maybe I just missed those particular comments.

    2. I disagree, the topics ARE related because abagond’s post displays his and his followers’ hatred for white people and especially white women. And this topic discusses anti-white hatred, the perfect fit.

      He sugarcoats and guards his words, but it is clear that he hates white people and he has a real hatred for white women.

      I agree with Bay Area Guy, you ARE full of childish insults, but that’s all i mostly see from racist blacks like yourself on the net,
      you either lust after whites or you hate us completely.

      Shouldn’t you be spending time with the young white child in the photo that you posted on abagond’s?
      I didn’t know it was legal or moral for that matter, to have relationships with kids!
      Confusing, but like you said, you never know who’s behind the screen!

  9. Also,

    “By the way, I’ve already explained why I left Abagond. Of course, I used to comment there, but got branded a “white supremacist” by you of all people.”

    I remember the particular incident you are talking about now. And I realize that I didn’t say you were a white supremacist (although I think that now, reading your comments on this blog). I said that your views were beginning to sound like those of white supremacists, because you and I were having a very interesting discussion until you started bringing up all these StormFront-esque notions.

    1. What Stormfront-esque notions?

      Did I ever claim that blacks were intellectually inferior? No.

      Did I talk about how much blacks are savages because they go around committing crimes and stuff (which is what those Stormfronter types ofen say)? No.

      Did I actually every say that whites were biologically superior and were endowed with superior intelligence and planning? No.

      I just like my people. But I guess that’s all it takes to be a white supremacist these days.

  10. For all white people out there:

    You’re not allowed to be pro-white or think anything positive about your group, or say anything critical about non-whites.

    Failure to do so makes you a white supremacist.

    1. Actually, no one on earth can stop a White person from being pro-White, or thinking positive things about his or her group.

      White people can say critical things about non-Whites, but those non-Whites get to talk back – and vice versa.

      1. To Alpha Unit:

        Actually, no one on earth can stop a White person from being pro-White, or thinking positive things about his or her group.

        Depending upon what you mean by pro-White you can certainly get someone fired, shunned, vilified in the press, and threatened.

    2. Alpha is right. And to add to that, being pro-white has a bad rap because of the beliefs and behaviors of organizations that define themselves as pro-white groups. Cab you find me one pro-white organization that isn’t steeped in Neo-Nazism?

      If there is a pro-white group out there that is benign, then I don’t really have any issues with them. I’m not really sure what a non-hateful pro white organization would look and what their official policies would be. I’m just not aware of any. What would be their aims? What do they think of having a black family in the white house? Or interracial marriage? Or non-white immigration? And if they are against these things what would they advocate that people do to stop it?

      1. To Tulio:

        Yes, Amren, which has expressly separated itself from anti-Semites and basically will not allow people like David Duke to speak. They were going to have a conference recently but the hotel that was going to host the conference canceled it because they received a substantial number of threats. The organizations that threatened the hotel claimed that the Amren organization was a bunch of Nazis. (Even the SPLC acknowledges that they are not Nazis..) Anyone expressing mild (but I wouldn’t call Amren mild..) pro-White sentiment in public tends to be vilified leaving a vacuum which is filled by virulent extremists.

        1. Excellent point Uncle Milton.

          Since even the slightest pro-white sentiment will be publicly vilified, this opens the door for underground, fringe extremists.

          Something for the anti-racists/leftists to keep in mind.

        2. To Bay Area Guy:

          Since even the slightest pro-white sentiment will be publicly vilified, this opens the door for underground, fringe extremists.

          Arguably Pay Buchanan expresses pro-White sentiments but I doubt he would be allowed to speak on any college campus (With the exception of some right wing Christian campuses..) but he is given a limited venue on network TV. I think the using the term pro-White is very loaded I am trying to think what would be more accurate.

      2. To Tulio:

        Sorry I meant to quote this:

        Cab you find me one pro-white organization that isn’t steeped in Neo-Nazism?

        I’m not really sure what a non-hateful pro white organization would look and what their official policies would be.

        I wouldn’t call Amren non-hateful but they have allowed people like this guy to speak at their conferences:

        http://www.fredoneverything.net/

        Who’s married to a Mexican woman and lives in Mexico.

        1. Fred Reed’s an amusing and humorous man.

          He doesn’t have a ton of intellectual analysis on his side, but when you read him, he just seems to make sense. His views somehow resonate with me.

          But yeah, as far as pro-white organizations go, Amren is relatively mild.

  11. Bay Area Guy,

    “Gee, I don’t know, maybe it’s because only bad things are said about whites. I have yet to see someone make a critical remark about blacks or neutral remark about whites who doesn’t get viciously attacked.”

    I have made several comments about whites that were neutral/good. Random examples: one (white male) commenter remarked that all whites are racist. I responded that some of them are, but not all are. And another commenter said that she is convinced hate/bigotry must be encoded in the DNA of whites, and I said that their racism isn’t innate, but learned. I wasn’t viciously attacked for either of those comments.

    Actually, I’m surprised I’m getting the “black, anti-white radical” stamp here. I’ve been accused of being anti-black on more than one occasion, and I’m hardly an extremist of any sort.

    I agree that those that are critical of blacks are not well-received on abagond’s, I am not one of those doing the chatisizing (unless the person is clearly being hypocritical or bigoted, which several are). My comments about blacks, unless they are positive, aren’t cheered over there either. I think this is because they believe that blacks are already dragged through the mud enough, not because they are unwilling to admit any failings of blacks.

    “What Stormfront-esque notions?”

    Do you really want me to go over to abagond’s, find the statements, and paste them here for you? I’m not feeling up for that at the moment, and I think you know which comments I’m referring to.

    1. Fine, since you aren’t willing to cut and paste, I went through those comments (which were basically all on the “how to talk to white people” post).

      And let me tell you, Natasha, you haven’t got shit. Only your liberal definition of what a white supremacist is.

      Here’s what I said on that post:

      -I called whites like Tim Wise self-haters (which they are).

      -I proclaimed that I’m pro-white and proud to be white.

      -I pointed out that this country was founded by whites, had an immigration policy designed to keep it white, and was majority white throughout its history (also true).

      -I pointed out that I’m more likely to view white contributions as more important than non-white contributions to this country (which isn’t a crazy white supremacist position to take, as you would have it. Who were our founding fathers? Who wrote the constitution?)

      -I endorsed separation between blacks and whites as a potential solution, due to the fact that we don’t really get along too well. Of course, there are many white supremacists who also endorse such a position, but that doesn’t logically mean that one who considers such a notion is a white supremacist. My attitude is that if blacks are so damn tired of us, they should live in their own nation.

      -I pointed out black hostility and how they make many demands of whites (which is true)

      Basically, I said that I’m pro-white, am proud of white accomplishments and see them as more valuable than non-white achievements, am skeptical about racial reconciliation between blacks and whites, pointed out some true historical facts, and noted how many black activists can be unreasonable in their beliefs.

      Here’s what you said:

      If not giving much weight to non-white contributions to this nation, extolling the virtues of whites, and observing black hostility and distrust towards whites makes me a white supremacist, then so be it. If preferring my tribe over others (which is perfectly natural) makes me a vicious supremacist, I won’t lose any sleep over that.

      Thanks for outlining just exactly what a white supremacist is. Cheers!

      Yup, that’s what you called me a white supremacist for. Is that’s all it takes to be a white supremacist, then the word doesn’t really have much meaning, and I won’t lose any sleep over being called one.

      Those are the offending comments from Abagond. I read through that post with my comments, and I’ll tell you again that you haven’t got shit.

      Try again.

      1. No, that’s not the comment I’m referring to.

        Since you’re not willing to look at this honestly, and are simply getting defensive, I think this discussion is becoming pointless.

        1. Well, for all you white people out there, here is another rule:

          -If a black person accuses you of something, never come to your own defense.

          Otherwise, you’re being defensive, unwilling to look at yourself honestly, and “derailing.”

          Remember, according to blacks like Natasha, denial always means guilt.

          By the way Natasha, I looked at all of my comments on that post, and once again, you haven’t got jack.

  12. FG,

    “You can be mixed and white at the same time, like Wentworth Miller.”

    How liberal you are with the term “white.” So I guess you consider Halle Berry, Barack Obama, and countless other biracials to be “black,” even though you rail against the One Drop Rule?

    1. If I’m not mistaken, both Obama and Halle identify as both black and mixed, so the situation is analogous. You can’t really identify as exclusively mixed in this country because there aren’t enough biracials around to form an ethnic group. You have to attach yourself to blacks or whites. You’re treating “white” as an honorary title, one that should be distributed in a fair manner. I view it more as a description of a person’s appearance.

  13. Bay Area, you’re being defensive because you’vee quickly descending into personal attacks and curse words. I find that unnecessary, unless you think you are at war with me, in which case you are attacking defensively. I’ve never attacked you in this post (I don’t consider “white supremacist” to be an attack, but a descriptor): please give me the same courtesy.

    1. you’ve quickly descending into personal attacks and curse words.

      You’re right, I apologize. Curse words and attacks are not valid arguments, and I’ll refrain from them in the future.

      (I don’t consider “white supremacist” to be an attack, but a descriptor):

      What?! Natasha, you know how loaded of a term that is, and you know that it isn’t exactly a flattering “descriptor,” so what kind of response do you expect when you call someone a white supremacist?

      please give me the same courtesy.

      Fair enough. From now on, no more curse words or ad hominem attacks on my part.

      However, I would ask that you extend me the courtesy of not beating up a straw man.

      Better yet, define “white supremacist,” because you seem to have a fairly liberal definition of what constitutes one.

  14. Bay Area

    “What?! Natasha, you know how loaded of a term that is, and you know that it isn’t exactly a flattering “descriptor,” so what kind of response do you expect when you call someone a white supremacist?”

    If you are espousing white supremacist views, why are you offended at being called such? It doesn’t make much sense. Here is how white supremacy is essentially defined as someone who thinks that whites are superior to others. Whether that be intellectually, culturally, or otherwise. So, by that definition, are you not one?

    ————–

    FG,

    “You’re treating “white” as an honorary title, one that should be distributed in a fair manner. I view it more as a description of a person’s appearance.”

    Didn’t you say that you are not accepted as white by many whites?

    1. Natasha, I am pro-white, favor my group, and harbor prejudice.

      Yes, I do prefer whites over non-whites.

      Most would see that as being prejudiced or racist, which are normal feelings to harbor.

      However, when you use the term “white supremacist,” you’re just trying to score rhetorical points.

      But yes, if being pro-white and preferring whites means I’m a white supremacist, then so be it. I’m a white supremacist. Happy now that you know I’m some wicked and vile white supremacist? Glad I admitted it? Good, because I really don’t care anymore.

      I guess that makes Robert a white supremacist as well.

      I guess most whites are white supremacists, since we’re supposedly all racist and look down on other groups deep down inside.

      Doesn’t take much to be seen as a white supremacist these days.

  15. Quote from a black male poster remarking Natasha’s comments about black men:

    “mynameismyname
    Natasha,

    There were many disgusting comments made about black men and black women in this post and many others.

    And then you and others say that non-blacks are so eager to date blacks?! LOL. Comments like many of the ones posted in this thread show that blacks themselves have assimiliated the anti-black attitudes that the U.S. was built upon. What makes you think these non-blacks don’t think these thoughts just as much if not more? If you don’t like yourself, who in the heck will???

    Why do you think the majority of white women aren’t exactly tripping over themselves to be with a black man?
    I’m curious.”

    From what i read as an anonymous lurker,
    it looks like Natasha W has hatred for black men and is more defensive of white men because she is with a white man.

    And after reading the comments on “Are white women less racist than white men” at abagond’s seems like blacks have strong hatred towards each other and they are their own worst enemy.

    Many black women need to bash black men and put down others in order to justify their relationships to white men.

  16. “Natasha W:

    You are right. Sometimes I get the urge to help others understand how wrong they are in their conclusions and behaviors, especially when said conclusions and behaviors are hurtful to themselves and others. But I think now — it is good! Let these black men continue to spew their garbage on black women. It will only open the eyes of more black women, who will soon not bother with them at all. And then where will black men be? They won’t exist of course, because black women make create men, in every sense possible.”

    Trying to figure out what you guys are talking about here and i found this comment.
    This comment above shows that this poster is advocating for the eradication of black men.

    Black women should not bother with black men anymore and they shouldn’t be having kids with them and then they won’t exist!

    How sweet and non-racist!
    Cause only whites are racist right? LOL

    This just shows that blacks hate themselves which is why the best thing to do with people like this is IGNORE them.

    Some people think they are right all the time and others are always wrong because you don’t agree with everything they say.
    You can’t win with self-righeous idiots like this, IGNORE.

    Back to the topic at hand, alot of anti-white hatred is overlooked because blacks and latinos like to play the victim and the media goes along with it, in my opinion.

    1. RiverinCambridge, you’re funny. Yes, I made all of those comments, and yes, people were none to pleased about it (Bay Area Guy, take note). I don’t hate black men, just like I don’t hate whites. But I do think that the some members of the above groups have issues, and I’m within my rights to say so.

      1. And no, I wasn’t calling for a genocide upon black men; what a complete overstatement. What I meant was it doesn’t seem like a very good survival strategy to bite the hand that feeds you.

      2. Okay, fair enough, Natasha.

        Perhaps it was on a post that I missed or was a while back.

        I guess you don’t just get on whites. You’re an equal opportunity irritant!

        1. Ahem — ad hominem!

          I’m an equal opportunity analyzer.

          And I’m not too worried if people are offended by what I say, as long as they eventually stop to think if what I say has any veracity.

        2. To Bay Area Guy:

          I guess you don’t just get on whites.

          Well considering she is dating a White guy I would suspect on occasion she does get on Whites, or at least one White unless she really doesn’t like cowgirl.

          My annoying sexual comment aside, I thought Natasha’s remarks on Abagond’s website were pretty mild.

        3. @ Natasha

          Sorry, analyzer, not irritant. I guess my point was that either way, you irritate people. Although I suppose that’s not your intention.

          @ Milton

          Yes, relative to some of the other commenters, she is pretty mild. That doesn’t mean that I agree with her, or that she’s a completely rational saint (although I guess none of us are).

  17. And i wouldn’t think too much of this Thad guy, if you go to abagond’s blog and read his comments he is mostly bragging and talking to the commenters as if they are his students.
    He is a white apologist, he kisses black people’s butt because he has a black wife.

    He uses sock puppets to talk to himself and others, read his comments and then read comments from a poster called “Color of love.”

    Both claim to be from Brazil and whenever Thad says something Color of love follows behind his comment by kissing his butt or plugging his website.
    He’s pretty pathetic, he talks to himself but the commenters on abagond’s blog are too stupid to notice that its the same person typing.
    They talk to him as if its another person! LOL

    Some people are just slow, and can’t read.

    Rob, you should do a post on the Hypocrisy and anti-white propaganda of blogger’s like Abagond.

    1. I don’t think Color of Luv is a sock puppet of Thad.

      I think Abagond’s a computer programmer, which means he understands how those things work, so if that were the case, I’m sure he would be rooted out as a sock puppet.

      I wouldn’t say he kisses black peoples’ butts either.

      You should see the intense debates he’s had with Abagond, Ankhesen Mie, Jasmin, and others.

      I don’t agree with everything he says, but I don’t mind Thad.

  18. No disrespect to anyone here, but this entire subject is really stupid. I don’t know why you’re all spending valuable time talking about this nonsense.. as I said no disrespect don’t take my comment the wrong way

  19. Bay Area Guy
    June 23, 2010 at 10:51 PM To be fair to Abagond, he doesn’t ban people or censor them simply for disagreeing with him.

    He allowed No Slappz, The Great White Man, Alan, and other white trolls to lurk around for a while. He only banned them because they violated the comments policy. Of course, you could argue that he was more willing to ban them on account of ideological differences, since almost everyone’s broken the comments policy at one point.

    But still, to his credit, he does allow dissenting opinions.

    I’m not a defender or lover of Abagond in any way, but what you’re saying isn’t entirely fair”

    Yes, Bay Area Guy, you’re entitled to your own opinion but clearly this blogger hates whites i don’t care how many “big words” and
    “light-hearted” sentences come out, he is a hater.

    And i love my race i won’t be fair to anyone that is not fair to my people, period.

  20. @Robert Lindsay

    What happened was I wrote this post praising this Black female blogger, and left a note in her comments section. She has now removed my comment apparently due to complaints. All these crazy Blacks are coming here from Jamila’s site.

    I didn’t get any complaints about it. I removed it because Obsidian, who I see has already made his way over here to complain to you about me, told me that he had every intention of spamming my blog–from multiple computers if necessary–until I was willing to pay attentiont to him. I was trying to avoid having his crazies come over, but apparently I was too late. Sorry! But don’t blame me!

    1. I removed it because Obsidian, who I see has already made his way over here to complain to you about me, told me that he had every intention of spamming my blog–from multiple computers if necessary–until I was willing to pay attentiont to him.

      😯

      *chic noir dead faints*

      @Jamilla- Are you kidding?

      1. Nope, I’m not joking; I saved the comment where he said so, although I took the comment down. Obsidian is pretty far off his rocker.

  21. Anti-white is anti-white and i don’t mingle with Anti-white haters or confused self-hating blacks that spread propaganda! Nuff said Natasha!

    De EEbil White man is to blame for everything!

    Yt be waycist! LOL Except for the ones that you people like to lust after. THAT’S funny!

    1. RiverinCambridge, I’m not sure if I should dignify you with a response, but I will anyway.

      I’m not “anti-white,” as I clarified earlier. Discussing bigotry (from all of those who express it, not just some whites), hardly makes me anti-white.

      I’m not “self-hating” either, because I can offer an honest critique of the behavior exhbited by some blacks.

      And lastly, I certainly don’t lust after whites. It’s interesting that most of the men I’ve dated in the past were black, but since I’m now with someone who is white, I “lust after whites/have jungle fever/hate black men” according to commenters on this blog and abagond’s. I mean, you people can’t be serious with this.

      1. Great response Natasha.

        I also agree. It’s always interesting that whenever a black person is dating or married to a white, everyone assumes that whites must be all that black person is into. Or it must be some “jungle fever” thing. It’s as if they can’t imagine that just two perfectly normal, well-adjusted people of differences could have met under perfectly normal circumstances and fallen for each for the same reason any other couple does. It’s ridiculous.

  22. “Alpha Unit
    June 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM RiverInCambridge, what is your opinion of Whites who lust after and pursue Blacks and other non-Whites?”

    Alpha,
    I find them to be WAY confused and weird!

    I don’t believe in whites that go against their own race! Just my personal belief!

    I think they are sick just like the slave owners that messed with the black female slaves!

    For me, my people come first and my ladies are always white!
    Black women are just unattractive to me!

      1. Thing is, there’s such a diversity in the way black women look that I can never understand people that say, “black women are unattractive.” That’s especially true when talking about black women from Latin America and the various parts of Africa that have their own features. I think for these people they feel they are unattractive BECAUSE they are black and they’ve essentially been trained to associate black women with unattractiveness. There ugly black women and pretty ones. How someone can think all the women of a certain background are ugly I don’t know.

      2. I stick to white women, just my preference.

        I think its extremely ugly when non-white women guilt trip white men into liking them.

        Almost as though they think if they shame or get angry at white men enough that we’ll just suddenly like them and come running! LOL

        1. I think its extremely ugly when non-white women guilt trip white men into liking them.

          Almost as though they think if they shame or get angry at white men enough that we’ll just suddenly like them and come running!

          I don’t necessarily think that’s the case. It’s never happened to me. Perhaps I just have an aura that scares black women away 🙂

          I think Robert would argue the opposite, that it’s black men who try to guilt white women. I have no evidence for that either, so I’ll let other people be the judge.

      1. To Rob:

        “What is PTBWF? Pre-tied bandana with fringe ?”

        Yes, I have heard it is one of Sarah Palin’s favorite fetishes…

        Although I find Ms. Palin to be a joke.. I wouldn’t mind having a romp with her if she wore black leather…and never spoke. The last part is especially important.

      2. PTBWF means proud to be white forever! LOL

        I know its only ok for black to be proud though, if a white person is proud and loves their race they get slammed for it!

  23. Uncle Milton,

    “Well considering she is dating a White guy I would suspect on occasion she does get on Whites, or at least one White unless she really doesn’t like cowgirl.”

    Lol!

    But you’re wrong. It’s not only “on occasion.” : P

    And with that, since I haven’t yet added to the topic of this post, I’ll say to the bolded points:

    (1) “Black men are better in bed than White men.”

    I disagree. Entirely.

    (2) “Black men treat women better than White men.”

    I don’t know how other men are treating their women, but mine is always a proper gentleman.

      1. Yeah, sorry about that. I just feel that many people (Whites and non-Whites) tend to keep making it an issue by bringing it up all of the time (not having a go here; proper discussion on the subject needs to take place).

        Sad reflection on humankind, isn’t it? Any differences between people have to be an issue. Disability, age, race, sexual orientation, they all seem to be issues for society that are never properly resolved. That goes for both sides, the prejudiced and those who flaunt their differences for special treatment.

  24. I am very proud to say, Robert, that I am comment #300 for this post!

    Guess if you want a lot of hits, you just need to talk about race and interracial sex more often!

  25. I hear lot of black women are finding it difficult finding men because lot black men are chasing after white women in their droves. Is there truth to this?

      1. So did I, Natasha, and I’ve been married to him for quite some time.

        I, too, have heard about this “man shortage” for Black women. Since there’s no shortage of men in the world, I think this is subject to interpretation.

        1. Right. There is no shortage of men for black women. Last time I checked, men still composed about half of the U.S., and world, population.

      2. Yeah right.

        You never show your face, you never show your so-called boyfriend, i think you’re a liar.

        You are like one of those desperate black chicks that wear rings and claim to be married and then go home and send flowers to yourself. LOL
        You showed a picture of a little kid and said it was your boyfriend, you didn’t show a man.
        You’re a liar and desperate for a white man that’s why you and those other hypocrite black women talk about whites all the time and then claim to be with a white man.

        You’re just the opposite of one of abagond’s stereotypes on whites.
        You think its ok to talk trash about white people and call us racist because your excuse is
        “my boyfriend is white so i can’t be racist.”

        One of the many reasons whites don’t want to deal with blacks, because you people have to be right all the time and anyone that doesn’t agree with you is a racist.

        1. To RiverInCambridge:

          Yeah right.

          You never show your face, you never show your so-called boyfriend, i think you’re a liar..

          Most people on this site and Abagond’s don’t show their face nor that of their significant others.. why should they? (I never have..have you?) Your reply is pretty nasty… if you have an issue with her talking about White men in a negative.. then form a rebuttal around that and keep away from the personal. To be blunt I don’t think Natasha W talks negatively about White men more than many White women talk about White men.

    1. There is a man shortage in the Black community. Way too many Black men are in prison or jail. As time goes on, many others are simply dead. Many of the existing men are not employed, homeless, on drugs or drinking, etc. And quite a few Black men are gay.

      The man shortage is there, but it’s not due to Black guys chasing White women.

  26. A Black woman told me once, while we were having sex, with fear in her eyes, “You’re pretty big, you know?” That’s a compliment. A Black chick tells me I have a big cock.
    =====

    “… with FEAR in her eyes.”

    OMFG Robert. l guess you is a pretty big BOI then Robert “Mu dick” Stallion Lindsay. No wonder you love black noggers Robert.

    How old was she Robert, 12 years young? 11? 10?

  27. hottie mcsorry – you seem like a nice sort of person. Generally, I notice on this thread that talk of large black dicks seems to bring the chicks in. Hmmm.

  28. To Uncle Milton:
    my reply was justified because i find people like Natasha and alot of other commenters on that site to be hypocrites.

    If you read there, you can see her and other commenters making nasty comments about other people’s personal lives, so i don’t see why they can’t take it back.

    She made a remark about you “never know who’s behind the screen” yet she doesn’t show who she is and i thought that was pretty hypocritical to make an ignorant comment like that.
    Almost like she’s saying people need to prove themselves to her but she is special in her mind so she doesn’t have to do the same.

    This is the hypocrisy and ignorance of blacks that irks me.
    They can sit online all day and talk about white people but the minute someone says a word to them all hell breaks loose. LOL

    1. Oh, quit your histrionics.

      I discuss the racism of some whites, and so? I discuss everyone. I’m not talking about individual people or pointing fingers. So don’t take it personally.

      As for the photo, I didn’t have to post any pictures, period — most people that post on blogs do not show their photos or photos of loved ones. Where’s your photo? But I posted that picture of my SO when he was younger mainly because I and a few other commenters had been talking about hair color changes from childhood to adulthood. I was going to post a current picture to note the difference, but something told me that wouldn’t be very wise since others read the blog as well. Now I see that I made the right decision in going against my prior thoughts.

  29. Well the way the posters talk to each other you’d think they are best friends Natasha.

    You all kiss abagond’s butt and you all agree with him, you act like you have different views, but you actually all parrot everything he writes.

    Why are you afraid to show a photo of your imaginary white boyfriend?

    You come here questioning people but you hide yourself!

    You are a hypocrite and the typical self-righteous ignorant negro.

    White people are racist but you and other blacks are “holier-than thou” and can do no wrong.

    You showed a picture of somebody’s little kid because you have no boyfriend and you have a face too ugly to show!

  30. Natasha says:
    “Oh, quit your histrionics.

    I discuss the racism of some whites, and so? I discuss everyone. I’m not talking about individual people or pointing fingers. So don’t take it personally”

    And this comment is bullshit, because you and others on that blog talk shit about white people when you claim to be in relationships with white men! HYPOCRITE.
    Oh your white boy is special, but all the other white people need to “shape up.”

    And for the record, you people need to get off your ass and get a job.

    While you’re at it, GET A LIFE.

    I could leave that blog come back in 10 years to read it and you losers would still be there.

    You spend all day there talking about what white people need to do to act right and what they need to do to be up to black peoples’ standards.

    How about YOU and the other losers there get a life and find employment.

    Racism is reality, DEAL WITH IT.

    Typing and nit-picking white people won’t change that in case you bottom feeders didn’t notice.

  31. Recently Uncle Milton asked what the endgame would be for anti-white hate blogger abagond:

    Uncle Milton:
    “To some degree this post recycles much of the other themes on Abagond’s blog. I would ask what’s the endgame.”

    Good question!
    And in reference to the post here from Robert,
    I would say the endgame for loud-mouth negro nazi’s like abagond would be redundant whining and self-destruction.

    Blacks complain over and over about
    “whitey being racist” and
    “whites need to do this or that.”
    Eventually there constant hatred against whites will destroy them inside, because they ultimately hate themselves but they would rather blame whitey for all their troubles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *