Goodbye and Good Riddance

Eugene Terreblanche was just murdered by Black farm workers in a wage dispute. A few years back, Terreblanche got into it with a Black guy at a gas station and severely beat the guy. The Black guy suffered serious brain damage as a result. I don’t know the details of the incident.

Eugene Terreblanche made racial hatred his whole raison d’ etre, and he reaped the hatred that his karma sowed. What comes around, goes around; paybacks are a bitch; you get out of this world what you put into it. Insert favorite aphorism here.

See that swastika-looking AWB insignia in the background? That’s not an accidental design. If being a White advocate means sticking up for bastards like this, I’d almost rather throw in with the Abagonds, but it ain’t much of a choice.

Terreblanche was a White nationalist hero, and there are a lot of comments on White nationalist sites about the White farmer murders. It is a very serious problem. 8% of the White farmers in South Africa have been murdered in the past 16 years.

But it’s not some extermination campaign because they are White. As with most rural violence, it’s tied up in land tenure. If those White farmers had as much land as your average Black farmer did, they wouldn’t be getting killed any more than anyone else in South Africa. Those few White farmers have most of the farmland, and almost all of the good farmland, in the country.

The Blacks were removed from the land, banana republic style, to squatter “homelands” which quickly become overpopulated, overfarmed and badly eroded. But it was shitty land anyway (Malan 1990). Meanwhile, ~5% of the farmers (all White) owned 90% of the good farmland. Switch continents and it could be the Philippines, Colombia, Brazil or El Salvador 1980. Sometimes geography and even racial dynamics are irrelevant, but a White nationalist will never understand this simple truism.

Obviously, there needs to be some kind of a land reform, but it’s been stalled. The Black farmers are landless or have tiny and infertile plots, and they are attacking the White farmers to kill them and take over their land. Were a decent land reform done, none of this would be happening.

By the way, if you want to read an awesome book by a White South African that is coming from something like the Liberal Race Realism of this blog, check out the reference.

References

Malan, Rian. 1990. My Traitor’s Heart: A South African Exile Returns to Face His Country, His Tribe, and His Conscience. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

14 thoughts on “Goodbye and Good Riddance”

  1. If being a White advocate means sticking up for bastards like this, I’d almost rather throw in with the Abagonds

    While I in no way condone the extremism of Eugene Terreblanche, I would never throw in with the Abagonds. This asshole may have gotten what he deserved, but I’ll be damned if I allow anti-racists and non-whites to use him as a rallying cry against white advocates.

    I do agree, however, that white advocates need to pick and choose their battles better. They shouldn’t make a big fuss about this. Instead, they should focus on more important issues, like, I don’t know, the stuff we talk about here! Getting rid of PC cultural Marxism would be a good start.

    1. Well, I’m on board with you with that one, bro. I really need to do a blog post on what Liberal Race Realism is.

      As far as the PC Cultural Marxism evidenced in the “Racist!” post, I want to see Whites kill and drive a stake through its heart, never to rise again.

  2. A more balanced perspective might be found
    at the why-we-are-white-refugees blogspot.

    Bob, are you claiming that black farmers were
    active on the land in question, and skilled or as skilled as White farmers and that White farmers originally took over that land from the adequately skilled black farmer, driving him out?

    1. There is need for land reform in South Africa. Something like 80% of the good farmland in South Africa is in the hands of a small number of White farmers. It’s similar to many other semi-feudal situations all over the world. The Blacks are essentially landless or have small plots and are killing the White large landowners in order to take over their land. They aren’t killing them “because they are White” or any of the other lies that the WN’s say.

      I don’t know who would make a better farmer. I don’t see why you could have co-ops of Black farmers or allow Black farmers to tend small plots. What’s the argument? That African Blacks are too stupid to figure out how to grow food? How hard can it be? That’s the old “African niggers are so stupid they can’t even figure out how to grow food” line. You hear it all the time over at American Renaissance. Standard fare. I’m not buying it.

  3. “Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

    “The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

    “Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

    “What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

    “How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

    “And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

    “But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

    “They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

    “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtKKJSfYraU&feature=related

  4. “The Black guy suffered serious brain damage ” -RL-
    ———–

    heg: A nigger can’t suffer ” serious brain damage”. The nigger is a “serious brain damage” by birth.

  5. If the blacks aren’t killing the farmers in part at least because they are White, one of five murders should be committed against black farmers, according to your stats. Any documentation this is
    happening?

  6. Arthur Kemp made the point that Terreblanche
    was paternalistic and wrongfully believed that a White minority could rule (and kindly) over a instructable black majority and that he believed in the apartheid system, which Kemp, favoring simple removal of the majority, believed was doomed from the get-go.

    Kemp’s post on the murder itself however doesn’t seemingly clarify that Terreblanche modified his ideology once SA’s apartheid system dismantled in favor of promoting a seperate state for Boers.

    Missing in both yours and the Rifkind (who does outline the evolution) piece is any example of “racial hatred” per se emanating from Terreblanche in either time period. Maybe you believe paternalism equates with hate. Kemp infers the Whites should have simply driven the blacks out of all the land in which they wished to live, then lived apart. Would this have been more or less “hateful?”

    1. Hard question to answer. They both suck! Apartheid is not a progressive paternalistic approach to a racial group. An example of that is the way that the Australian state has taken over some Aboriginal communities, banned alcohol, porn, dope and all sorts of stuff and is being forced to treat them like children who need policing because they can’t seem to conduct themselves in even a remotely civilized manner. I fully support this approach. However, Apartheid was more supremacist than paternalistic.

  7. RL:
    You do not know what you are talking about – that is not rude, it is a fact. Have you lived in either South Africa or any African country, for that matter? Not ‘visited’ or ‘traveled’ there but LIVED there; worked there, had friends or family there; tried making a life for yourself there?
    I can 100% say that you have not, for you would not be making these ridiculous statements.
    For you to say that the white farmers are not getting killed because they are white is absolutely untrue. For you to say that they own 80% of the fertile land is also absolutely untrue. Did you know that in SA, black people are allowed to just show up on your doorstep one day, remove you and your entire family (‘remove’ often ends up with white people getting gang-raped and/or murdered) and just take over either your house, farm, beach house or whatever else you own? What usually happens then, is that they burn everything to the ground and then move on. I speak from personal experience, in case you think I’m fabricating this ridiculous story.
    And no, they absolutely do NOT know how to farm and have zero interested in learning how to do so – they just burn everything down. And I can see you’ve also never farmed, as your comment “how hard can it be to grow plants?” is just plain silly. I’ve had 2 of my uncles brutally murdered on their farms, only to have their farms then burned to the ground never to produce food ever again.
    They are barbarians and have no respect for life. Not just white people but their fellow brothers and sisters too.
    Do not speak/write about things of which you obviously have no knowledge, only what you read in the paper or see on television. The rest of the world has absolutely no idea what is going on, on that continent and if you guys think that a 1/4 of it makes it to the news, you are sadly mistaken.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *