“The Delusion of White Exceptionalism,” by Alpha Unit

Some Whites have the mistaken impression that what has been happening to Western Whites – and, specifically, to American Whites – is somehow unique in the history of Western civilization.

They seem to be under the delusion that to be White means to be dominant – all the time. The fact that Whites in this country are on the defensive so much of the time, as they see it, dismays them and angers them. Unable to grasp the fact that no status quo is ever permanent, they seek to blame someone, or something, for the reversal of political fortune that Whites, as a race, have experienced in America. It’s Jews. It’s Leftists. As if it matters. Change always comes, one way or another.

Whites are subject to the same vicissitudes of fortune as all other groups of people. White people are not special in this world. They don’t get to be exempt from the problems other groups have to deal with. They are not immune to what groups inflict on one another.

It is a given that groups compete with one another and very often oppress one another. Whites are not unique in what they have done to others. And when the same thing gets done to them, there’s nothing strange about it, no matter how perplexed and upset racists get.

It is a fantasy of White racists that the White race is above all others. It isn’t. The proof is all around. What has happened to other groups of people happens to Whites, too. It is the way of the world.

Racists, who are unable to understand this, are essentially children. They cannot face the realities of the world or of humanity as they are.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

68 thoughts on ““The Delusion of White Exceptionalism,” by Alpha Unit”

  1. I think this post could serve as a case study in projection. Especially considering that the Negro race has from time immemorial been called a “childish race” by every other group they’ve encountered. A race that requires watching over and management, sure our methods differ now, but the need is still there, and so it is done by us, the ever-paternalistic whites.

    This post is superficially true, of course, as any other list of platitudes would be, but it fails in its attempt towards anything resembling insight. Rather it is a bald plea to all the “White Racists” to please don’t fight back. Good luck with that one. When your time comes, it’ll be level-headed HBDers like me calling for moderation.

    Oh, and congratulations on your proper use of the term “vicissitudes.”

    1. If blacks “from time immemorial” needed watching over and “parenting” from other races, then blacks wouldn’t even be here. How did blacks manage to survive on their own prior to colonial contact? Why didn’t they self-destruct or die of disease and starvation millennia ago in the absence of outside help?

      The black race is the parent race in the literal sense of the word. From the black race all other races were created. Blacks don’t come from whites, white come from blacks.

    2. tulip, You’re right, I should have qualified my statement. Blacks only need managing *within civilization*. I have no doubt Africans will be around for another 10,000 years or more, they are well-equipped to survive in the jungle and on the savanna, just not in massive numbers where a division of labor, societal infrastructure, and civilized behavior are all required…but they won’t be around another millennium if the Chinese decide to colonize Africa, who may not end up playing as nice as the Europeans did.

      You are equivocating on the previous use of “parenting”. The science of modern human origins is inapplicable to the previous statements on whether or not blacks or white racists are “child-like”. And you really shouldn’t make it so easy for a less tactful white to make the “blacks are less evolved” riposte.

    3. And you really shouldn’t make it so easy for a less tactful white to make the “blacks are less evolved” riposte.

      Well, let them go right ahead. Because I can riposte right back. I don’t buy it. There’s no such thing as one race being more evolved than the other. Every race evolved to perfectly suit its own geographic/climatic environment. So if blacks looked like white people would we be more evolved? Of course not, because what makes white people white just wouldn’t work in Africa. For example, whites would eventually evolve darker and darker skin. Equatorial sun is not kind to white skin. At the same time, the weaker sun of Europe is not good for black people because it leaves them Vitamin D deficient. Nature has fine tuned our melanin density perfectly for the African environment, and the same with whites in Europe.

  2. Whites are not unique in what they have done to others.

    No, we’re unique in what we do to ourselves. What other group ever decided it’s civilization was simply morally wrong to dominate another? Is any other civ under the impression that maybe black culture is equal to it?

    Whites are the one intelligent culture that has somehow come to not believe in its obvious superiority, solely for the benefit of an inferior one.

    1. “Whites are the one intelligent culture that has somehow come to not believe in its obvious superiority, solely for the benefit of an inferior one.”

      Lol, you don’t think whites actually feel this way? Don’t make me laugh.

    2. White nations are the only ones on earth who open our borders to broad numbers of immigrants of other races under the expectation that they’ll assimilate into our culture. And then are shocked when they don’t.

    3. Believe it or not, many non-white countries allow whites to immigrate. For example, Panama which woos Americans to retire there. Thailand has a lot of white retirees. Mexico and Costa Rica do too. There are quite a few Brits living in places like Kenya. Germans in Namibia. So it isn’t like white countries are the only ones getting immigration from different races.

      1. Great, so there are non-white countries that encourage elderly barren white couples to bring their wealth, but no chance of breeding, multiplying, and subsequently changing local customs, language, culture etc. Your argument is seriously flawed.

    4. Lol, you don’t think whites actually feel this way? Don’t make me laugh.

      We do, but we have been guilt-tripped about feeling this way… that is why we hide a lot of our feelings behind Pee Cee platitudes… to convince others (but primarily ourselves) that ‘we be not raciss’.

    5. Believe it or not, many non-white countries allow whites to immigrate. For example, Panama which woos Americans to retire there. Thailand has a lot of white retirees. Mexico and Costa Rica do too. There are quite a few Brits living in places like Kenya. Germans in Namibia. So it isn’t like white countries are the only ones getting immigration from different races.

      Apples to oranges comparison.

      This is cause the Whites emigrating to Third-World locales are usually retirees, and are far smaller in number and often have to have a lot of money to enter those countries — since there is no welfare net to get subsidized from the way non-Whites do in White countries.

  3. Well I’d say we’ve been above the other races for at least 600 years or so, but before that we were unique, as is and was every race or sub-race.

    White civilizations have face crises and collapsed in the past, as have non white civilizations, but wholesale abdication of a civilization involving nearly all white nations simultaneously is unique.

    Anyhow, you’ve given no reason for whites not to care about white civilization and to just let it die. For a race to openly embrace it’s own demise when it obviously has the power to do something about it– now that’s unique as far as I can tell. Whites up to this point have for the most part been in denial. Our present trajectory need only continue a few paces before it’s completely undeniable that us “evil racists,” have been right all along.

    I would say that for us not to feel “anxiety,” about our displacement is asking the impossible, not to mention unnatural and perverse.

  4. The very concept of a “white race” or “white civilization” was contrived. The Romans didn’t think of themselves as “white”, or “white civilization”, they divided the world between barbarian and civilized. The whites of N. Europe were considered barbarians just like any non-civilized group of non-whites. The Romans didn’t have any concept of N. Europeans being their white brothers or somehow belonging to the same branch of humanity. That didn’t come until much, much later with invention of racism. Prior to that, it was state against state, kingdom against kingdom. Scottish highlanders fighting against Scottish lowlanders even within the same territory. That’s how it’s always been in all parts of the world. That’s why I don’t think racism is natural. Africans never have though of themselves as “the black race”. They identified with their particular ethnic group, and a black from another ethnic group in a different part of Africa was as much a foreigner as a Portuguese colonizer. That described racial thinking for just about all of human history up till several hundred years ago.

    “The white race” or “white civilization” was a social construct devised to justify racist ideology and the slave trade, which was just a tool to create profit for the European upper class.

    1. This makes a lot of sense, but on the other hand, if modern racism has just come to replace tribalism, isn’t it normal in that sense though? I mean, back in the old days, how many times would members of two different races be part of the same tribe?

      OTOH, if you recall, Amerindians used to take fleeing Whites and Blacks into their tribe. Once you were in their tribe, you were treated just like any other member of the tribe. The tribe was what was important, not your race.

      I agree with you though that historically anyway, racism has no relevance to our species and we have not really been racists most of our lives. The sooner we get over racism as much as possible, the better off we will be.

    2. This whole idea of dividing people into races and judging them primarily on that basis is only one way of looking at people, and a seriously flawed one, I think.

    3. To me, it is so obvious that racism has no relevance to our species. I have my own views of where racism comes from, but from a certain perspective, it is a completely specious way of seeing the world.

    4. This makes a lot of sense, but on the other hand, if modern racism has just come to replace tribalism, isn’t it normal in that sense though? I mean, back in the old days, how many times would members of two different races be part of the same tribe?

      Back then, you really didn’t have races living together in the first place. Just because of distance. The world was much bigger and you didn’t have immigration from far away. So how would members of difference races become part of the same tribe in the first place? Geography was the main issue.

    5. The very concept of a “white race” or “white civilization” was contrived. …

      No more or less ‘contrived’ than the so-called “Black race”.

  5. “The sooner we get over racism as much as possible, the better off we will be.”

    Didn’t you say that you were a white favoritist. This sounds gradiently close to white racism, in fact is actually more corruptable to racism (from all sides) that the citizenism of HBDers who are openly declared racists, but know better where to draw the lines (anti pc led education reforms, MSM censorship lunacy, self-mutilating immigration policies, etc).

    As an Asian, I wonder how much of the pc nonsense and race obfuscating is just stalling action to see how East Asia’s social developement eventually plays out. If this is the case, so be it. I’m as curious as anyone.

    1. Well, I like my people, I’m ethnocentric. I didn’t use to be, but I am now. Just like you Koreans are ethnocentric. Thing is though that Whites are not allowed to be openly ethnocentric anymore. It’s considered the same thing as White Supremacy, White Power, skinheads, Nazis, all that. That’s ridiculous. I like my race, my people, our culture, the whole nine yards. Nowadays, that is a subversive POV.

      It’s sad that nowadays pro-White automatically means racist against other races, or bash other races. But it doesn’t have to be that way. In this country, Hispanics, Asians, Blacks, etc. are often proud of their people, but they are not necessarily all that racist. My guest poster is a proud Black woman, but she’s not all that racist. Some of my Black commenters are proud Blacks, but they are not racists either.

      It’s mostly Whites who have issues with this stuff. Whites can’t seem to be proud of themselves without hating other races. What’s wrong with White people anyway?

    2. Just like you Koreans are ethnocentric. Thing is though that Whites are not allowed to be openly ethnocentric anymore.

      You used whites vs. Koreans as an example above, but a more fair comparison would be Koreans vs. Irish or Koreans vs. Italian. Nobody cares if a white believes in Irish or Italian pride. There are still I believe even parades in NYC for this sort of thing. So whites can be ethnocentric if we’re talking about a white ethnicity and nobody minds that. Thing is, white pride has a different implication than Irish pride or Italian pride. In the public eye, “white pride” is associated with neo-nazism and hate for good reason.

    3. The thing is though, that if you spend a lot of time around Whites, you realize after a while that a majority of Whites are White-priders! It’s just way, way, deep down inside and buried. Surveys have shown that most Whites are White Priders. They have shown that ~73% of Whites are proud of being White, like White culture and feel that White culture ought to be preserved. But almost all of those people really hate the real White Priders, White supremacist haters.

      I can’t put into words how hated these folks are in the White community, at least here in California.

      I mean, when we were growing up, guys would say to each other, “That’s mighty White of you.” As a joke. Even the Hispanics would say it. The Hispanics I grew up with were sort of White Priders in that sense. I’ve heard Whites say things like, “Hey, that’s not the White thing to do,” or, “That’s not proper White behavior.” Liberals kind of groan when you say that, but then they nod their heads.

      My parents are typical liberals, but when I questioned them closely, it turns out that they were brought up in an America where Whiteness as assumed to be better, and Whites had a sort of natural pride. It wasn’t discussed much, but that’s just how it was.

      The reason White Pride sentiments are so condemned is because the assholes who go around calling themselves White Priders are typically some really, really nasty White Supremacist racists. So White ethnocentrism = racist asshole at best, out and out Nazi at worst.

      There’s nothing wrong with the philosophy per se, it’s just that people don’t like where it has historically led to, and what it currently leads to – racist oppression of non-Whites.

    4. In the public eye, “white pride” is associated with neo-nazism and hate for good reason.

      Just like without 24/7 media promotion, “black pride” would be associated with hate and backward superstition also for good reason.

  6. If someone were to tell me, “Black people aren’t special, and have gone through what other groups have gone through,” I wouldn’t be angry or offended. To me, it’s self-evident.

    The type of Black person who would take great offense to that is probably one who’s pushing some kind of agenda.

    People from all kinds of groups do that sort of thing.

  7. Whites have the power to do something about their demise in the same way Indians didn’t. We could relatively easily seal off our borders and expel as many non whites as we see fit. It wouldn’t be easy or pretty (mostly the expelling part, borders are pretty simple) but it could be done. There are all sorts of potential policies for keeping white places white that we don’t pursue because we don’t consciously think there’s anything special about white people.

  8. As a Black individual, I certainly see something special about Black people. But anyone who would claim that his race is entitled to special status over other races is naive, IMO.

  9. The reason it seems that whites have a difficulty simultaneously not hating other races while being pro-white is in my opinion due to the stigmatization of anything even remotely pro-white. Since pro-whites are ostracized they respond in kind by ostracizing everyone else. I think it’s not a wonder that WNs are often paranoid, withdrawn and spiteful, but rather a wonder that they aren’t even more so considering how they’ve been treated for the past few decades.

    By putting honest racial discourse beyond the pale you also get a less self criticism from WNs. If people would debate some of the loony WN theories like hyper-Nordicism and Nazi fetishism, they might become less prevalent (I think they’re on the decline anyways). For the most part however, racialist discourse is considered a sin to engage in, in any way shape or form.

    1. In America up through the 1950s white supremacy was axiomatic and indeed a governing principle of American society. And yet we still had lynchings, punitive Jim Crow laws, hate groups like the KKK, paranoia against (then) powerless and oppressed minorities like blacks, Mexicans, and East Asians, and so on. White nationalists are–and always have been– the cause of the problems for which they imagine themselves to be the solution.

      As Tulio points out, no one is threatened by Irish or Italian pride, for example. But white pride, for whatever reason, has always had a tendency to go off the rails. I find it particularly ironic that most white pride people are those least capable of appreciating the unique characteristics and spirit of white European civilization, which are really those things that fall under the heading of liberalism.

      And as for the nutty ideas engendered by these folks? They’ve been around since the 19th century, at least. The Pan-Semitic Jewish-Arab conspiracy for example. Who was grinding them under the jack-booted heel of Political Correctness then?

  10. Racists, who are unable to understand this, are essentially children. They cannot face the realities of the world or of humanity as they are.

    You’re describing liberals, my dear.

  11. To me, it is so obvious that racism has no relevance to our species. I have my own views of where racism comes from, but from a certain perspective, it is a completely specious way of seeing the world.

    Mmm…nope. Have you ever heard of Social Identity Theory? Perceptions of outgroups is negative, while those of the ingroup is postive.

    1. White people are not special in this world.

      Actually, we are a very special people, since the world as we know it, for good and for ‘bad’, is a product of White civilization.

  12. Unable to grasp the fact that no status quo is ever permanent, they seek to blame someone, or something,

    Now you’re describing blacks! Kudos!

  13. “Thing is though that Whites are not allowed to be openly ethnocentric anymore. It’s considered the same thing as White Supremacy, White Power, skinheads, Nazis, all that. That’s ridiculous. I like my race, my people, our culture, the whole nine yards. Nowadays, that is a subversive POV.”

    I don’t see a Yellow Pride day or parade anywhere. Do you? And its not sufficient that all non-whites must slog through a torrent of white culture artifacts, heroes, thinkers, artists, writers, religious nuts, no matter how mediocre or even ridiculous (Crane, Manet, Seurat, Vonnegut, London, Freud, Voltaire, Weber, Paine, La Metrie, Maslow, most of Plato, etc. – of course there will be disagreement with this list, the point is that anyone can make such a list.) to get a high school diploma or BA. Education in the US is de facto white celebration YEARS, not days. And there are so MANY other examples of white priority/celebration that white people and even Asians (purportedly the “smart ones”) take for granted as much as fish take water for granted. White celebration would be like pissing into the ocean, right? Or am I onto something here. Possibly because the crap taught in schools is so crappy, the artifacts of white culture are increasingly seen as arbitrary that whites feel the need to celebrate whiteness? If this is true, then go ahead. Break out the confetti, streamers, and blowers. Party hardy. This yellow gladly steps aside.

  14. Good points. All things white are already celebrated in society. Nobody comes out and says it overtly, but it is by default, in so many little ways. For example, when I need to design an ad or web banner for a client, I need to sometimes purchase stock art of people. Sometimes I’ll see a photo that is stylistically perfect for the ad but the people in it are minorities, then I have a dilemma. If the person running the ad is white, he knows that most people if they see an ad with blacks in it, are going to respond to the product differently than if it has whites in it, since whites are just considered the “norm” of society while blacks, Asians, Hispanics, et al are considered “ethnic” whatever that means. Now it might be okay to have blacks in the ad if you’re marketing some sports wear or something, but if it’s a high end product, there is an unspoken rule that you have to show whites using the product. Since obviously blacks lower the value of the product by the very act of being black. So when we blacks rant about “white privilege” in many little ways that add up, that’s the kind of stuff we see all the time that is invisible to whites.

  15. To Alpha Unit:

    Some Whites have the mistaken impression that what has been happening to Western Whites – and, specifically, to American Whites – is somehow unique in the history of Western civilization.

    Since you don’t really come out and say it….. what has been happening to Western Whites?

    1. “compelled”

      Spot on. Love it! Not many understand what’s happening. It take some percolating in the stew to get it.

  16. LOL Hacienda, most Chinese and Koreans are so about ten times as racially chauvinistic as your average white, black or latino. Just because they’re polite enough to keep quiet about it during their stay in America doesn’t mean they don’t have extreme racial pride.

    Sorry a “yellow” has to “slog the torrent,” of such “mediocre and ridiculous” thinkers as Plato, London and Paine. Glad you feel Western civilization is “crap.” Why don’t you leave the “crappy,” West and go live amongst your own.

    Your comments really say more about our current situation than anything I could think to say.

    Here we have a non white living in a white country by choice insulting some of our most treasured intellectual and literary giants and demanding that we include more non whites in school curricula, all the while claiming not be in the least bit ethnocentric.

    And of course, in the popular mind, this rude foreigner is “entitled to her opinion,” while an average Joe saying “I’m proud to be white,” is from the devil and in need of sensitivity training.

    1. Treasured by who? Can you tell me why Freud is treasured? What parts of Plato you deem great and beyond criticism?

      Why shouldn’t Lao Tze, Chuang Tzu, or C0nfucious be included in the curriculum? If you believe them to be less universal than Plato, Aristotle, Kant let us know why you feel this way.

      And, no, I did not say the “West” was “crappy”. And don’t tell me where to live. In real life you wouldn’t do it. On the internet, that’s just lame.

  17. To Alpha Unit:

    They have been compelled to cede power to “racial others.”

    Well I can’t say I can collectively tap into the mind of all White racists in the US but I would say you are wrong. Pat Buchanan (Racist-lite..) has drawn parallels to US Whites in the current day to the early dynamics between Europeans settlers and the severe displacement of American Indians and so have others. I think what they are saying is that they are being compelled by their own people not an outside force such as when ones country is conquered/colonized by force. We do have a dictatorship, we have a democracy, so it was elected officials, predominantly White who have enacted these changes.. and yes I would say that is unique.

    As for “They have been compelled to cede power to “racial others.” do you think White racists would be happier with the likes of Ward Connerly, Clarence Thomas, or Thomas Sowell over a White version of Barack Obama..? My guess is yes.

    1. So what racists are saying is that they have been compelled by their own people to cede power. What would make them do something like that?

  18. To Hacienda:

    Why shouldn’t Lao Tze, Chuang Tzu, or C0nfucious be included in the curriculum?

    They often are included at the college level. Especially he first two.

    Can you tell me why Freud is treasured?

    Yes, he’s basically the founder of modern psychiatry although I wouldn’t say he’s treasured.

    As for learning Eastern philosophy, I would try to learn it if I lived in East Asian and/or especially if I was raising a child there. When one studies Western philosophy it helps one understand it’s foundation and influence on much of Western law, culture, and politics. One is not necessarily better than the other but knowing the respective philosophies helps explain to some degree, how each society functions.

    1. Milton,

      Yes, as option courses. Plato and the rest are part of the non-optional curriculum in most colleges or are just part of a reading list that a student can’t avoid. This despite, his ideas shown to be trivial, wrong, wrong-headed, or not even in the ballpark. Eg. – his fascist political state, notions of death, his idealized “forms” LOL (this one is truly laughable).

      Lao Tze, OTOH is arguable far more relevant, not in dialectical terms, but in laying out general grounds of human existence. A universal “spirit” of humanity. After all, evolution finally discovered land creatures are basically water creatures. Right?

      Chuang Tzu is arguably the greatest humanistic philosopher ever. The greatest intermediater of ideas and modes of existence ever.

      Chuang Tzu, Lao Tze, and possibly Confucious and Siddhartha should be required reading in high school or college.

      Freud is the father of psychoanalysis, not modern psychiatry. Modern psychiatry is too varied in its methods and theories to be attributed to a single person. The large majority of psychologists and psychiatrists (not psychoanalysts) dismiss Freud not only on content but also on non-testability of his “theories”. Psychoanalysis may amount to little more than brain-washing and probably has the same success rate as placebo effects. Put a long-bearded grey haired serious looking rabbinical (sorry can’t resist) type along with a bunch of other “colleagues” in grave psychological discussion with Jung, Weber, Hottenfroidie, Gustav Termuz XX the Serious One, etc. and you could get similar curative effects on neuroticized young women. At least you could a 100 years ago in Vienna, I don’t think you can anymore.

  19. To Hacienda:
    Yes, as option courses.

    In the curricula of several colleges I looked at recently they required some exposure to non-Western philosophy (I think they had some label like culture or something like that..) and did not require Western philosophy courses. Of course I did not parse through the 1000s of colleges in the US but that was my recent experience.

    Freud is the father of psychoanalysis, not modern psychiatry.

    My Uncle who is a Psychiatrist would disagree with you. Yes some of his theories have been dismissed or deemphasized but he is still very influential in the culture and psychiatry.

    This despite, his ideas shown to be trivial, wrong, wrong-headed, or not even in the ballpark. Eg. – his fascist political state, notions of death, his idealized “forms” LOL (this one is truly laughable).

    If you’ll look at my previous post I wasn’t arguing the merits or drawbacks of Western philosophy nor did I mention Plato, one of many dozens of influential Western philosophers. I argued that if one lives in a culture, one should probably become familiar with it’s background philosophy. I would say there is merit also in learning the philosophies of other cultures.

  20. To Alpha Unit:

    So what racists are saying is that they have been compelled by their own people to cede power. What would make them do something like that?

    I probably should have asked you what you meant by ceding power and in what era are you talking about ceding power or how this process works in your mind. For the most part rich and powerful Whites, in my opinion, have not ceded power in the US or not in relation to the percentages of Whites in the US.

  21. Milton,

    Vienna, turn of the 19c, was a special place. LOL. Wittgenstein called it the Center for the Destruction of the World. LOL. Luckily for the non-white world, much of what Vienna’s ambitions came to be. And whites came out a better people for it, too.
    Hard too say what Freud’s ultimate purpose was, but it sure as hell wasn’t just about “psychoanalysis”. LOL.

  22. LINDSAY, YOU’RE INTELLIGENT! YOUR ARTICLES ARE FULL OF SUBJECTIVE WISDOM! LOVE IT MAN, KEEP UP THE FANTASTIC JOURNALISTIC EXCELLENCE!

  23. To Tulio:
    Believe it or not, many non-white countries allow whites to immigrate.
    So it isn’t like white countries are the only ones getting immigration from different races.

    You are correct.. but.. there is a very big difference.. for the most part European/American emigrants to countries like Thailand, Panama, Mexico, and Costa Rica are bringing money into those countries and are not competing for local jobs and have to pay for their own medical treatment. The opposite is generally true for immigrants from non-White countries to the US and Europe. The latter is clearly a form of labor arbitrage.

  24. Not only that, but they are usually retirees who will not be breeding with the locals.

    If they move as a couple yes.. if a single man moves to some place like Thailand, Costa Rica, or the Philippines.. invariably he find a local woman. I don’t know what the exact figures might be but I am guessing about 1/3 of the time they will end up having a kid or two. I have seen some pretty successful marriages (or cohabitations..) of this sort and some disastrously (usually for the Western guy but not always..) unsuccessful unions.

  25. I indeed acknowledge that history is cyclical, not linear. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that whites are undergoing a temporary slump. I also recognize that many rightfully hate us and eagerly await our demise.

    Still, as a white advocate, I’m not just going to sit back and wait for others to even the score.

  26. “It is a given that groups compete with one another and very often oppress one another. Whites are not unique…”
    “And when the same thing gets done to them, there’s nothing strange about it, no matter how perplexed and upset racists get.”
    If this qualifies me as a racist so be it, but shouldn’t we try and avoid getting oppressed ourselves?
    Sure, we shouldn’t oppress others, but how does that mean we have to become doormats?
    Why don’t we just shoot for equality instead?

    1. No one has to become a doormat. And if you want to shoot for equality, go for it. I wrote this post in response to an anti-Black racist comment that was made on this blog. My point is that groups aren’t that different and that the notion that one is “superior” to the others is fanciful.

    1. Goldilocks theory of race 🙂 ?

      Being 96% Caucasian, I’d love for it to be true, but most serious HBD bloggers don’t buy it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *