The Latest “Black People Acting Up” Video

Following on the heels of the Epic Bearded Man and Chinese Girl Fights Black Girl videos, we have another video of a Black person acting all ornery and playing the fool.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-KFA1U8iOw]

In this case, she ought to know better, as she’s a university student and the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee. It’s hard to tell what’s going on, but she gets into a loud verbal argument with another woman in class, then throws a water bottle across the room at the other woman (this part occurs before the filming starts), then apparently threatens the teacher and the other students, then the teacher calls the campus police. The cops come in, ask her three times to come with them, she refuses, so they take her down, cuff her and take her away in a big screaming, kicking, screeching hysterical mess.

She was arguing about a bad grade on a paper and had been holding up the class yelling about this for half an hour.

This is getting linked around, and already has 450,000 views. It’s apparently getting linked to “HBD” (frankly racist-lite)* blogs like One STD.

One STD tunes in with a discourse on whether this behavior is due to elevated testosterone in Black women. I guess I’m going to pass on that one, other than to note that it’s an old stereotype, frankly confirmed by many honest Black women, that a lot of Black women are pretty angry and aggressive. Black guys have always said that, but then Black guys tend to often be that way themselves, so maybe they just deal.

It’s interesting that in a lot Black domestic abuse cases, the women don’t just sit there and take it like your typical meek White battered woman doormat. They fight back, hard! Often with weapons, and sometimes with deadly force.

*I really hate to call HBD sites racist-lite, because I don’t like to be dicky and through the racism word around promiscuously, but you need to call a spade a spade sometimes. Truth is, racism-lite is probably true only of the best of them. The rest are even worse. One thing that seems to motivate almost all HBD sites is animus towards Blacks, and to a lesser extent, towards Hispanics. Or animus towards NAM’s if you will.

It’s completely wrong to conflate them with White nationalists, though some White nationalists are calling themselves HBD’ers as part of the endless effort to sugarcoat and disguise their philosophy.

The very phrase “HBD” bothers me, since it’s so often just a cover for racism of some variety or other. It’s pretentious-scientific, and seeks to disguise its real nature.

I don’t like the word “NAM’s” too much either, though it adds a descriptive terms not in our language. Problem is almost everyone using the term NAM’s is a White racist. Gee thanks guys, for ruining a perfectly good word. Considering who’s using it and the context in which it’s being used, why not just get rid of NAM’s and call them “muds?”

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

24 thoughts on “The Latest “Black People Acting Up” Video”

  1. Robert, here in the Northeast, the HBD story of the week is “flash mobs”:
    http://tinyurl.com/yzzpcju

    Philadelphia is like a donut: white suburbs surrounding a black city surrounding a white-dominated Central City (tourist district and downtown area). The city essentially invented modern commuting — the Main Line was bringing suburban residents to downtown jobs in the mid-1800s.

    What’s worrisome is the possibility that this could become a trend. If large numbers of ghetto blacks decide “we want to make life uncomfortable for whites,” there wouldn’t be much to stop them. If that happens, enclavism is going to get real popular real fast.

  2. The very phrase “HBD” bothers me, since it’s so often just a cover for racism of some variety or other. It’s pretentious-scientific, and seeks to disguise its real nature.

    “HBD” is used to differentiate one type of belief in racial differences from our society’s commonly accepted view of racism. Racism is usually associated with the concepts of prejudice (pre-judgement) and ignorance, implying that the racist person’s feelings about blacks are motivated by not knowing them well and so he dislikes them for the color of their skin. I was taught that in the 60s and believed in into the 90s.

    HBD’ers, who consider themselves modern race realists, don’t think they’re pre-judging or are motivated by ignorance. They cite genetic, anthropologic and intelligence research in claiming that differences between ethnic groups are more than skin deep, with a host of ramifications about values, cultures and ethics. They also point out, largely accurately, that the educated whites are brilliant at pontificating excuses for societal socioeconomic differences and proposing solutions from which their own economic status excuses themselves.

    The emperor’s new clothes attitude against HBD might have been harmless enough in some other time and place, and it does seem rather distasteful to have to point out the shortcomings of those less successful, but the political teeth given to initiatives likes “diversity” today makes it necessary to point out the research findings documenting those differences. For example, No Child Left Behind has resulted in a narrowing of the cirriculum toward raising as many student’s reading and math scores to proficiency, that other kinds of learning like science and history have become shortchanged. The belief that girls could do math as well as boys created a cirriculum redesign that has narrowed the measured gender gap, but also reduced the kind of gifted and talented programs that produce our, usually male, math elites.

    And we all know, of course, how fundamentally dishonest the media is about reporting race news that doesn’t promote their diversity agenda.

    1. Yes, I know all of this, but still, most HBD’ers are pretty damn racist. Levi Johnson below seems to be one of the few non-racist HBD writers out there. And me, supposedly.

      Why must race realists have animus towards Blacks and Hispanics, or NAM’s? I mean race realism should just be science, a search for the truth, like in a lab. It should be as free of bias and subjectivity as possible.

    1. There probably isn’t one answer to why Black women seem more aggressive, but as far as I’m concerned, women who are insecure and stressed out are probably more aggressive than women who aren’t.

      In any event, racists don’t really care about Black women, so I don’t get why they are discussing it.

    2. Yeah, good point. Actually, they hate Black women, that’s the truth.

      The only use talking about such things is if you want to help people. If high testosterone does indeed make Black women more aggressive and this causes problems for them, maybe we could offer them a pill to lower their testosterone to say levels of White women.

      Testosterone has some effects in women, especially on sex drive. So there might be some lowering of sex drive, but a lot of White women are *really damn horny*, so I don’t think that’s something to worry about.

      I don’t see why a woman wants higher testosterone anyway? Who needs it? It’s just going to make you more aggressive so you act more like a man? Why not have lower testosterone and act more like a woman?

      Plus high testosterone in Black women gives it to Black male fetuses and results in them having higher testosterone as they grow up, which if you ask me, causes them lots of problems. I don’t see the benefit for Black females to have elevated testosterone. What for?

      Black women also have higher rates of breast cancer. I wonder if there is a tie-in.

    3. The genetic mechanisms behind violence actually appear to be more complicated than “circulating testosterone” – which is a theory the “intellectual” HBDers aped from Stormfront.

      Anyhow, it seems like a lot of these ‘problems’ if their root is truly in biology would easily be solvable soon enough or even now with existing treatments. Very little discussion of that, however.

    4. Estrogen dominance might be a bigger problem for Black women than testosterone, and that can cause physical and emotional problems itself.

    5. Men understand so little about women. If a woman is angry or aggressive, she must be “acting like a man.”

  3. To Rob:

    Testosterone has some effects in women, especially on sex drive. So there might be some lowering of sex drive, but a lot of White women are *really damn horny*, so I don’t think that’s something to worry about.

    I don’t see why a woman wants higher testosterone anyway? Who needs it? It’s just going to make you more aggressive so you act more like a man? Why not have lower testosterone and act more like a woman?

    All normal women have some testosterone (it varies..), hormone therapy for post menopausal women involves taking testosterone as well as estrogen. The testosterone apparently can increase their libido markedly.

  4. What is a NAM?

    Naughty Asian mistress….
    well no more likely it is a Non-Asian minority (e.g. Black or Latino…)

  5. Christianity is ‘anti-semitic?’
    Replacement theology is very Jew hating. But I suppose it would depend on the person?

    All of my friends are born again believers, I am very pro-Messianic. Most “Jews” that hate Christians are commie slimes, thats b/c communism hates God.

    1. There must be an alternate version of this thread in the Bizarro World you live in, Mad One. No one mentioned Christianity *or* Anti-Semitism.

  6. My prediction: The term HBD (Human Biodioversity, for those of you who didn’t get it but were afraid to look dumb by asking) will eventually itself become nearly as pejorative as “racist,” because of its use by, well, racists. Then they’ll whine about how “politically correct” folks persecute them by calling them HBD, when they’re really just

  7. There must be an alternate version of this thread in the Bizarro World you live in, Mad One

    I was not responding to you, Mort.
    When I hit the reply button, it obviously went in the wrong place.

    Mort; Is it necessary to defame? Did I say something nasty to you? Is this the way you always talk to people?

    1. This is your idea of defamation? But really, your ideas and those of others like you–basically the dittohead crowd–are so divorced from any recognizable reality that it just frustrates me to no end.

  8. But really, your ideas and those of others like you–basically the dittohead crowd–are so divorced from any recognizable reality that it just frustrates me to no end.

    Because I dont live in your world, “I” frustrate YOU? “Ditto-Head?” I have been the way I am since a little girl, and will continue to be like that;
    pro-male, anti-feminazi, tomboy, loyal, trustworthy, patriotic and a fighter. That is not a ‘ditto-head.’ In fact, I wish people were more individual with their strengths.

    Maybe you are projecting on me, that you are frustrated with yourself.

  9. Nice try. But I’ll just ignore you from now on.

    For what? Asking you questions that you cannot seem to answer.
    Sorry, Mr. Goldman, it is not I that has the issue, it is you.
    Ignore all you want, after all, I am the ‘fascist’ in your eyes. I am already dead to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *