Why Are All Racists and Sexists Reactionaries?

This is something I don’t really understand.

Lots of Black people act bad. Before you say Whites do too, there’s way more bad Blacks actors than bad White actors, percentage-wise. Living in a poor all-White town was instructive, as was moving to a poor Hispanic town. It finally made me realize that this fucked-up behavior doesn’t have much to do with economics. Sure, there were idiots in the White town. But it seemed like in the Hispanic town there were 3 times more of them per capita, and the bad actors acted about 3 times worse than the White bad actors. Of course I’m guessing here, but that’s my perception.

I figure in a poor Black town, there will be 8-9 times more bad actors per capita, and I figure they will act 8-9 times worse than White bad actors.

So really it’s not a case of bad actors. Kids of every race act like shits. But to us Whites, it seems like the Hispanic and Black bad actors are way worse than our own and there’s way more of them to boot.

It’s pretty clear that once a White city turns Hispanic or Black, there’s a decline in all sorts of variables. It’s much worse in the case of a White city turning Black, and this process has been viewed in realtime by millions of Americans. As a general rule, the city turns into a crime and squalor ridden Hellhole.

Given these obvious facts, I really don’t understand why the only White racists are reactionaries. Aren’t there any White liberals who are tired of Blacks and Hispanics too?

And why are racists so reactionary in every other way, too? They usually hate all of modernity – modern art, modern literature, modern music, modern culture, recreational drugs, the Sexual Revolution, the works. I don’t get it. If you’re a racist, you don’t like to rock out, get high and fuck your brains out? Why not? Aren’t there White dopers, rockers and sex freaks that are tired of minorities too? Aren’t there any Whites who dig David Bowie, Thomas Pynchon, Marcel Duchamp and Picasso, yet can’t stand Blacks? If not, why not?

Why do most White racists support Israel? Because, Arabniggers being an inferior race and all, it was cool of the superior White Jews to steal their land, kill them and ruin their lives? Why was that an ok thing to do? Because one is a superior race and the other is an inferior race? Really? So the superior races just get to kill the inferior races, ruin their lives and steal their land, everywhere on Earth, simply due to their superiority? Is there anything that is not ok for the superior to do to the inferior?

Anyway, why, just based on religion or test scores of whatever, does one race get to deliberately fuck over another one anyway? On what basis? Superiority? If so, wow, what an appalling mindset!

I’ve noticed something else. Sexists are all reactionaries too. There are plenty of woman-hating sites all over the Net. They’re pretty entertaining, but they’re all reactionary. I don’t get it. Women are a pain in the ass, and lots of normal humans end up having had quite enough of them. Hell, I know women who don’t like women. Aren’t there any liberals who’ve had it up to here with female shenanigans too?

Racist and sexist ideology aside, the more you learn about racists and sexists, the less appealing racism and sexism is based, if not on ideology, then at least on the reactionary assholes who are attracted to it.

Please follow and like us:

20 thoughts on “Why Are All Racists and Sexists Reactionaries?”

  1. I can’t remember if I’ve posted this on this site or not. (I know I’ve posted it somewhere.)

    The reason is essentially what the liberal coalition consists of — minorities (and low-skill white women) voting their pocketbooks; and the educated white elite, who can exclude poor-behavior minorities from their lives. In 2004, Kerry won high school dropouts and people with graduate degrees; Bush won people with high school diplomas and bachelors degrees. In 2008, Obama won all four groups, but the relative positions were still the same.

    So what unites the highest and lowest educated people into a political coalition? Basically, they want changes from middle Americans. So today’s political lineup is: Red) white males and their wives; vs. Blue) everyone else. Since nothing really unites the Left except the desire for “change,” Conservatives end up being defined by anti-change in every area.

  2. Seems that what Robert is really asking , for example, is “Why do so many racists hate modernity – modern culture, music, literature, etc.?”

    I don’t know, but maybe in order to maintain racist sensibilities you have to sort of filter out anything that would interfere with them. Maybe it requires great effort to be racist all the time.

    1. I really think that all of modernity is “contaminated” with anti-racism and feminism. I mean going along with the whole modern package, the whole drive towards modernism, you have the drive for equality for women and civil rights for races and ethnic groups. I really think that these folks just want to turn back the clock in every way and just go back and live in the old days when women knew their place and “the niggers” were kept in line.

      Modernity doesn’t explicitly state that it’s tied in with the drive for civil rights for women and ethnicities, but that’s been more or less part of the implicit package.

      I’ve also noticed that a lot of White racists hate the movies and even TV! All of cinema and television is seen as “contaminated” by Blacks and Black culture. Some of them even try to forbid their kids from watching the tube. They seem to hate modern music too – once again, it’s apparently contaminated by Blacks and Black culture.

  3. this is a really interesting question. so far as the politics side of it…i’ve heard politics is often determined by your parents’ politics. maybe racism/sexism are similar.

    both racism/sexism seem old-fashioned to me, it’s not all that surprising someone holding those views would take an anti-modern, reactionary point of view on other issues.

    also, the taboo nature of discussing racism & sexism…it just prevents any kind of debate and both racism/sexism cannot change into something more rational…that’s why i like coming to this blog. you actually have the nerve to discuss such matters.

    1. Saying that people learn racism from their parents is an anti-racist cliche, but I think there is something to it. Lately, I’ve been hanging out at Black-bashing sites, specifically Niggermania and Chimpout. At the least, those sites are educational for people interested in racism. One thing I notice over and over there is that the White racists are always quoting their fathers and their grandparents about “the niggers”. It’s pretty clear that they are carrying on a family tradition here.

  4. This is an issue I’ve thought about many times, but not in a racial dimension. I know mostly liberals because I live in a liberal city. I wonder why are all the people who are pro environment also pro-choice and in favor of gay marriage. Why do these same people say that poverty is the cause of crime and say that the death penalty is wrong. Why can’t someone be pro-abortion rights but not believe in gay marriage. You never seem to come across that. Why is it that if I know someone is in favor of gay marriage, they almost certainly are NOT pro-life and you can sure they believe in gun control too, even though none of these positions are intrinsically linked to one another.

    My only guess is that humans, being pack animals have the need to fit in and they know that they must accept the “package” of liberal values in order to be socially accepted.

    1. Yeah, people tend to “buy the whole package” on politics. If you don’t buy the package deal, you get mercilessly pounded by your own side, while the other side still hates you anyway. There’s really nothing to be gained and it just means really have no political friends at all. For instance, I’m a Leftist, but I hate illegal immigration and I’m race realist on race. Ok, right there that means that 99% of the Left rejects me outright despite the fact that I’m with them on most stuff. I’m heretical on 5% of the program, and that means I’m expelled from the party for not following the party line. Those stances even make me persona non grata with most liberals, because al political liberals are pro-illegal immigrant. Race realism is simply beyond the pale.

      But if I go to anti-illegal alien sites, it’s all radical reactionaries, I mean not even conservatives. Just far out ultra-right wackos. They’ve never accepted me, and I’ve been thrown off a number of their sites. I’m also banned from some race realist and WN fora for apparently being too anti-racist. Whereas the anti-racists all hate me and call me racist.

      So really, socially, I haven’t gained anything with my political heresy except to make myself across the board despised by the whole spectrum. So this is what happens to you when you pick and choose at the political smorgasbord as opposed to just buying the combination plate. Social ostracism. Most people just want to be liked and their willing to modify their politics in whatever direction wins them the most social approval.

    2. What I don’t get is how liberals can claim to be both pro-the environment AND pro-illegal immigrants.

      When a Mexican comes from his village in Chiapask, his polluting immediately increases from 3rd world subsistence levels to driving an SUV.

      Don’t they GET it that more people = more pollution / befouled water / destruction of the beautiful wild places???

      I see no contradiction between being conservative and being pro-environment. Conservative is all about conservation, after all. So how did the libs manage to co-opt our best issue?

    3. The support for Open Borders by the entire US environmental movement is truly insane. There has been some debate on this issue, but some rich Jew apparently gave $200 million to the Sierra Club on the basis that they not pass any resolutions opposing immigration. Since then, the Sierra Club has been all out for Open Borders or at least refuses to condemn it. Money talks. There’s no room for any anti-immigrant talk anywhere in the environmental movement and I am a part of that movement.

      Conservatives are all opposed to conservation AFAICT. As you note, I’m not sure why that is.

    4. Conservatives are opposed the conservation because it’s not in the interest of big business who sees the environment as resources to put to use for making money. Resources than can be turned into profit.

      I’d like to find out about the Jewish man who bought the Sierra Club off. I’ll bet you whoever he is, he lives way up in the hills behind gates far away from East L.A. and would’t dare put his own his kids in the LAUSD. That’s how those types are.

    5. Yeah, let’s face it, environmentalism cuts into the bottom line of business. That’s all there is to it. Not into the bottom line of every business, but all environmentalism hits the bottom line of some business or other. Conservatives are all about capitalism and the profit motive, so it’ll be a cold day in Hell when conservatives will ever support environmentalism. The environmental movement keeps trying to “reach out to Republicans.” It’s a joke, really.

  5. “Conservatives are all opposed to conservation AFAICT”

    Well, I wouldn’t say *all.* I’m not.

    Actually, conservatism has a long history of conservation. Teddy Roosevelt created the national park system, starting with Yellowstone.
    Many, many ordinary-Joe conservatives are also hunters, so they are members of Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Ducks Unlimited, etc., which charters are all about conservating the animal herds and beauty of nature for future generations to enjoy and hunt.
    But, the big corporations hijacked conservatism. Their ginormous campaign donations buy politicians who then grant them defacto monopolies. Big businesses are in no way lovers of competition.
    Truth is, an average-Joe small business owner conservative, who DOES appreciate the value of competition and whats to compete fairly, understands that his opposition is, in this order, big gov’t, big business, big labor.

    So, just as you’ve shown how in the environmental movement on the left, big money foundations shot down any talk of immigration restriction, so big money corporations try their best to shoot down any talk of making them clean up their messes.

    Time to re-start some widespread boycotting, I’d say.

    1. Yeah, small businesses always line up with Big Biz, but that is to their detriment. Big Business is always trying to take out every single small business in the country. A Walmart comes to town, and half the small businessmen go out of business. They were running small businesses making them maybe $30-40,000/yr. Now all they can do is work at Walmart for $8/hour. Pretty good way to destroy a small town’s middle class.

      Around here in the mountains there is tons of money in tourism. The small businessmen are all idiots and they support the loggers, the grazers, the destroyers. But I understand that the tourism brings in 10X as much $ to the local economy as the extractive stuff. Small businessmen just don’t get it. They need to pull their heads out. They even had this thing called YARTS which was a bus service taking people into the National Park. All the insane small businesspeople got together and killed it for some paranoid and conspiratorial reasons that made no sense. So the YARTS went to the next county over and now they are reaping the benefits of it.

      It’s proven that a nice looking business district makes more money than a crappy looking one, but the small business folks around here have fought all efforts to regulate the business district and make it look nice and touristy. Hence it looks pretty much like crap but they don’t care. They recently passed a sign ordinance that cleaned up a lot of the mess but the small businessmen all hated it. They gave them 15 YEARS to clean up their crappy signs, and even that wasn’t long enough!

      It’s true that fishermen and hunters have been good conservationists in general. But there has always been a lot of tension between them and the environmental community because they see enviros are liberal treehuggers and the hunters and fishers are basically redneck rightwingers. Also it doesn’t help that some enviros want to ban all hunting! There’s no some tension on the Pacific Coast with fishers and enviros setting up marine reserves. The sportfishers have always opposed the commercial fishers.

      It’s interesting. I assume many conservatives like to live in a nice-looking place? That’s good reason to be an enviro right there.

      And nice to have a conservative conservationist on board!

  6. I’d like to find out about the Jewish man who bought the Sierra Club off.

    His name is David Gelbaum. He lives in Newport Beach in a large home. He does, however, drive a honda Civic hybrid to maintain appearances. He gave Sierra Club 100 million dollars and told Carl Pope if the Sierra Club ever came out against illegal immigration, they’d never get another cent from him.

    “I did tell Carl Pope in 1994 or 1995 that if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me.”



    He’s a hedge fund manager that lost about a bazillion dollars betting on green energy. Now he’s broke:

    NEW YORK – The American Civil Liberties Union has lost a quarter of its yearly donations after a major donor cut off $19 million in annual donations because of economic difficulties.

  7. There is no serious political thought in the US. You line up behind whatever creed you choose – liberal, conservative, libertarian… And then you follow the line, whatever the contradictions. That’s why you have strange situations like people believing in evolution but not race differences.

    1. And then you follow the line, whatever the contradictions. That’s why you have strange situations like people believing in evolution but not race differences. -0la-

      heg: l never thought of that one. Evelution! Yes! Race? Hell NO! How dumb can you bee? As stupid as a liberal-communist shit for brain, ie endless stupidity.

      We are a nation of political amateurs here with a clown politics unlike any other in the West. -RL-

      heg: Wellwellwell … how many really stupid politicians in EU do you want me to show you? One politician, the leader of the party wanted to stop the bridge. Why? Because the fishes couldn’t find the way to swim around the bridge pillars. For that “wisdom” he was hailed as a hero.


      Yeah, people tend to “buy the whole package” on politics. If you don’t buy the package deal, you get mercilessly pounded by your own side, while the other side still hates you anyway. -RL-

      heg: This is how the jews controls the stupid (m)asses in the jew swindle “democracy”. The jews lump their agenda in one package. lf you don’t buy the whole thing the jews outs you.

      lf yo want to vote Rep you got to stand behind the warmongers and the jews imperialism proxy war machine USA. lf you want to vote Rep but don’t want the jew instigated wars, the jews will smear-slander you an un-american isolationist. The jews have pulled that trick since ww One.

      But you American are to stupid to see beyond the last Super Bowl or American ldol. American imperialism is in fact jewish imperialism. The jews controls US foreigne politic lock, stock and barrel. No? Who shaped US foreigne politic? The Jew Neo-Cons. Just read PNAC. The jews plan for US foreigne politic the comming decades is all spelled out there. Even retarded americans should be able to understand PNAC.

      When it comes to DemoCrap’s shit for brain liberal-communist the jews that controls the DemoCrap party just do what the jews always do, the jews lie. The jews can tell the demoCrap voters any bullshit, simply because the demoCrap’s are to stupid to even remember what the Lying jews told before the rigged US-election.

      US-“democracy” is an insult to any thinking women or man.

  8. The support for Open Borders by the entire US environmental movement is truly insane. There has been some debate on this issue, but some rich Jew apparently gave $200 million to the Sierra Club on the basis that they not pass any resolutions opposing immigration. -RL-

    heg: Any source?

  9. Sometimes I really appreciate your unswerving purpose, Heg – MERRY CHRISTMAS. Let’s kick the moneylenders out of the temple.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)