Repost from the old site.
For Chrissake people, even David Duke says the Jews don’t run the banks anymore. What more of an authority do you need?
Unfortunately, anti-Semitismphobia (irrational fear of anti-Semitism) has kept scholars from researching this question. I’ve done some research on my own. Jews largely ran the banking system of Europe from the late 1800’s into the 1900’s. Their dominance of this profession seems to have come to an end in the 1930’s and 1940’s. I guess that means that they got taken out by the Holocaust.
According to Henry Ford’s The International Jew, Jews made a run for US investment banking and consumer banking in the early part of the 1900’s in the US. Ford describes how Jews during this time made a play for investment banking in the US. They worked together to try to buy up as many investment banks as they could for the tribe.
That’s how Jews were back then – they worked together to acquire Jewish monopolies. They made significant penetration until the whistle was blown on them and Gentiles quit selling investment banks to the Jews. Smart move!
Ford says they then made a play for commercial banking in the US, but the whistle was blown early, and they were stopped in their tracks, as commercial bankers refused to sell to Jews. Jewish ethnic warfare is no good. The only way to fight it is anti-Semitism, and that’s not good for Jews or Gentiles.
The International Jew is actually a pretty good book if you can ignore some of the bullshit about The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I don’t think that Ford, at the time he wrote that book, was an anti-Semite at all. Those who are not convinced maybe ought to actually read the book?
US Jews at that time were extremely tribal, clannish and ethnocentric, and were waging ethnic warfare in order to corner and control various US professions. Jews have assimilated dramatically since then, and it’s not appropriate to compare the clannish Jews of 1908 with US Jews of today.
It was during this period that Jewish dominance of the US media and Hollywood occurred. The Jewish impetus for acquiring these assets originally was not to give more power and money to the Jews, but to fight anti-Semitism.
Many large US papers were in the hands of White Gentile anti-Semites and so was Hollywood. Large Jewish financiers met with concerned Jewish leaders, and plots were hatched to buy out large US papers. This is apparently the genesis of Jewish control of the New York Times.
It’s all pretty much water under the dam now. Jews do wield quite a bit of power in US media and Hollywood.
In addition to being due to extremely high Jewish verbal IQ (Possibly as high as 125!) and the extra-IQ factors that result directly and indirectly from that, Jewish power in the media and Hollywood is largely a legacy of hypertribal US Jews from the dog eat dog world of Eastern Europe in the early part of the 1900’s.
I think Jewish power in Hollywood is on the decline. Looking over a large section of movie ads recently, of course I saw Jewish names, but I saw a Hell of a lot of Gentile names too, in particular Italians. In some cases, those at the very top were Jews, but not always. It’s no secret that Italians have moved into Wall Street, Las Vegas and the movies bigtime. Are Scorsese and Coppola Jewish? Come on.
It’s also important to note that some of the biggest Hollywood Jews were awfully detribalized. Stanley Kubrick was a great director, but for all intents and purposes, he had left the Jews behind. He barely considered himself Jewish anymore. It seems unfair to deviously make up lists of Jews and include the deracinated ones right alongside the SuperJews.
Looking at the credits on a typical TV show is much more instructive. The list of Jewish names, in particular the all-important names of the ultimate producers and directors running the show, is stunning to behold. It seems that Jewish power is much greater in TV than in the movies these days.
Jewish media power is a tough one. The Los Angeles Times is one of the biggest papers in the country, and for decades was run by an ultrarich Whitebread WASP family named the Chandlers. They weren’t anti-Semites, but the Times was their baby. Where were the Jewish hands secretly running the Times?
One of my Jewish commenters noted that the Ochs Sulzbergers (owners of the New York Times) have been marrying Gentiles for a while now and are considered by ethnocentric Jews to have “left the tribe.” I don’t know what to make of such comments, but perhaps we should take them into consideration.
Anti-Semites say the Washington Post is “run by Jews”, but it’s run by a woman named Katharine Graham. Her father was a Jew. She’s not even Jewish by Jewish law! Since when is she some kind of secret Jew? Since when is everyone with some Jewish ancestry a secret part of the tribe? That’s getting pretty silly, people.
Repost from the old site.