“The Alpha Male Bites the Dust," by Alpha Unit

The latest by Alpha Unit, our guest poster, on Alpha Males. As an Alpha herself, she is a bit of an expert on this subject.
Are you an Alpha Male?
There are people who will teach you how to be, if you aren’t – for a price. A lot of them couch this instruction in talk about how to seduce women.
Which brings me to Al Gore.
The concept of the Alpha Male made a splash among media types during the 2000 Presidential campaign, when it was reported that candidate Gore had hired the feminist Naomi Wolf as a “style consultant.”
Ms. Wolf had worked previously for the Clinton campaign, as an adviser on outreach to women voters. Well, she was supposed to be acting in a similar capacity for Gore, but what got translated to the media was that she was coaching him in the ways of the Alpha Male, an allegation Ms. Wolf denies (She says she only used the term once, as a passing reference.).
Yes, the Alpha Male was subjected to a bit of ridicule as a result of all this, but he hasn’t gone anywhere. Go online, and you will see people cashing in, or trying to, with promises of transforming the feckless into alpha males, those dominant guys who get what they want from others – primarily women.
A lot of this thinking about dominance and submission is based on what occurs in the wild, especially in wolf packs, each of which is headed by a dominant, or alpha, male. This is known to be true, right?
Wrong.
So explains Dr. L. David Mech of the University of Minnesota, an expert who has been studying wolves for about forty years.
A wolf pack does not consist of a group of wolves that are subservient to a pack leader assuming the role of an alpha male. At least a natural wolf pack out in the wild does not.
Among his many publications is a paper released in 2000, in which Dr. Mech sets out to explain social dynamics among wolves in the wild. In so doing, he says that most research done on wolves has been done by observing wolves in captivity. And this research has led to some erroneous conclusions about wolf behavior.
“These captive packs,” Dr. Mech states, “were usually composed of an assortment of wolves from various sources placed together and allowed to breed at will.” He goes on to say, “In captive packs, the unacquainted wolves formed dominance hierarchies featuring alpha, beta, omega animals. etc. With such assemblages, these dominance labels were probably appropriate, for most species thrown together in captivity would usually so arrange themselves.”
Dr. Mech’s research for his paper was conducted during the summers of 1986 through 1998 on Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. He states that in the wild, a wolf pack is nothing but a family, consisting of a breeding pair and their young.
He cites earlier research in which it is hypothesized that one could tell by observing wolf pups which of them had potential as future alpha, or top-ranking, wolves. But he takes issue with this, saying that all young wolves automatically become alphas once they breed.
Dominance contests with other wolves are rare, he says, if they exist at all. “During my 13 summers observing the Ellesmere Island pack,” he says, “I saw none.”
And his assessment of all the talk about alpha wolves?

Thus calling a wolf an alpha is usually no more appropriate than referring to a human parent or doe deer as an alpha. Any parent is dominant to its young offspring, so “alpha” adds no information. Why not refer to an alpha female as the female parent, the breeding female, the matriarch, or simply the mother?
Such a designation emphasizes not the animal’s dominant status, which is trivial information, but its role as pack progenitor, which is critical information.

He reports that even though male wolves exhibit dominant posturing toward other pack members, a breeding male will defer to the breeding female, exhibiting submissive behavior in his approaches toward her, including giving up food to her.
If there is some type of dominance contest, he says, it is usually concerned with who will allocate food to the pups!
So what of “alpha males” among Homo sapiens sapiens? If a guy is an alpha male, does it mean he naturally resonates an authority that causes others (especially women) to do his bidding, willingly?
Perhaps. But the Alpha Male may find that he is doing the bidding of those he dominates.
Just ask any parent.

References

References Mech, L. David. May 2000. Alpha Status, Dominance, and Division of Labor in Wolf Packs. Minnesotans for Sustainability.
Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

15 thoughts on ““The Alpha Male Bites the Dust," by Alpha Unit”

    1. Sure. Dominance hierarchies exist in other animals, as well. I’m referring to the popular notion of someone being a “top dog” over others.

  1. I’m referring to the popular notion of someone being a “top dog” over others.
    Well top dog would refer to… well… dogs.. which although close to wolves are a different species. There could very well be some anthropomorphism involved in the observation of the behavior of domesticated dogs but I question whether this one professor’s assessment of wolf behavior counterbalances observations made over the centuries about dogs. The other caveat is that apparently under certain environments some wolves do exhibit the alpha behavior. If my memory of biology serves me correctly, such behavior becomes more prevalent when there is a scarcity of resources.

  2. My dear man, you are confusing me with a wildlife biologist.
    This blog post is not a biology lesson, it is simply a commentary on popular notions of dominance.
    Tell me: what kind of guy would you consider an alpha male?

    1. I would like to say something about the whole PUA scene where they are telling guys to be alpha males. They urge guys to go around sizing up other guys, figuring out if they are alphas or betas or omegas and then reacting according.
      I think this is preposterous. An alpha male does not go up to another male and think, “Is he another alpha, or a beta,or an omega, in which case, I will act either a, b, or c.”
      An alpha male doesn’t even analyze other guys at all. Why should he? Who cares?
      An alpha male is thinking about two things:
      “What am I doing now?”
      “What am I going to do next?”
      He’s not analyzing other guys at all.

    2. Yes. He’s handling his business. Dr. Mech touches on this when he talks about the way the alpha pair are all about the business of rearing the next generation.

  3. This blog post is not a biology lesson, it is simply a commentary on popular notions of dominance.
    Yes I understood you… I just don’t one man’s study of wolves in the wild negates the notion of the “top dog” since it’s origins came from observing dogs domesticated by humans.
    Tell me: what kind of guy would you consider an alpha male?
    Ghengis Khan.

  4. What are you talking about when you say “The Alpha Male Bites the Dust”? Did you not happen to notice that the USA elected a very arrogant/swaggering uppity mulatto who projected a very alpha image last November?
    Or is Obama a faux-alpha? He talks the talk but dudnt walk the walk? Many have already remarked on his dorkishness (which is mostly hidden from the public), his “wonkishness,” and his uber-bureaucratic nature. Obama is also mostly under the ‘guidance’ shall we say of a clique of insidious Jews who basically manufactured his entire political career…so he’s not quite the alphaish self-made-man I suppose.
    So which is it? Is Obama a true alpha or a faux-alpha?

    1. When I say “The Alpha Male Bites the Dust” I am suggesting that maybe the popular notion of what constitutes a dominant male is in error. Maybe dominance isn’t about drawing attention to yourself and getting other people to bow to your demands in an obvious way.
      Obama is kind of hard to figure. Some liberals think he is being a wimp when it comes to his opponents. People on the right seem divided: some call him a pansy and others portray him as an overbearing, monstrous tyrant.
      I suspect Obama is a dominant guy, but not in the way most people expect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *