Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (1932-2009)

RIP Teddy Kennedy. He authored of the 1965 Immigration Act that got rid of quotas that mandated that 9 At the time, the nation was full of hatred for Eastern and Southern Europeans, who were regarded as grossly inferior to the Nordic founding stock of America (of which I am a member – 5/8 British, 1/4 German, 1/8 French). Even Jews were regarded as inferior. IQ tests were showing Italians and Jews with IQ gaps as large as that between Blacks and Whites. Italians in particular (and to some extent Jews) were associated with crime, social decay, gangs, ghettos, etc. the same way that Blacks and Mexicans are now. Considering all this, it’s interesting that these groups are now fully integrated into the US middle class. There is little to no evidence that they are inferior to Nordic Whites. The ghettos, squalor, crime and gangs are a memory. At the time, the nation was so nuts about these groups that a proposal was made to sterilize them and to put them into camps to deal with them later. The model was eugenics, the same theory that drove the Nazis to their mass murder. The camps could have conceivably been used to kill these White inferiors, though that would have been odd. The nation was so in thrall to eugenics at the time and so contemptuous of these so-called inferior Whites that the only reason the proposal was shot down was that it would cost too much and require too much outlaw in manpower and materials. When Calvin Coolidge signed the bill, he made a remark about how the US was a Nordic nation and commented on the necessity to keep out these European “inferiors.” So given the stupid Nordicism behind that bill, it’s a good thing that it finally did get amended. Supposedly, the quotas were changed so that 9 Anyway, according to White nationalists, this bill sealed the doom on White America. They may be correct, but I don’t really care that the US will eventually become a non-White country. I’m more concerned about the rate at which the non-Whites come here and the quality of the non-Whites and their assimilation potential. After all, I grew up in a California that was 20-3 On the other hand, I don’t even recognize my state anymore. Immigration is more a problem of too much, too soon and way too many low quality Third World peasants and urban poor types who offer no benefit to the US and lots of downside. On top of that, it’s true that Teddy was behind the latest Amnesty bill too, along with Juan McCain. This one failed, and it would have amnestied in 20 million illegals and then, via chain immigration, would have allowed 60-80 million more relatives in. This is the outrage that Obama is determined to pass. If this bill passes, America as we know it will be gone forever and we will have to decide which type of Latin American country we are going to be. Teddy was also involved in the Chappaquiddick outrage, where a drunken Teddy drove his car off a bridge into a river, then made his way out of the car to the shore while his young female passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne, drowned. For this, amazingly, he apparently served no time at all. It was clearly a case of vehicular manslaughter. He delayed showing up at the police station until the booze had worn off. For this, he was hated forever by the Right, but you know if one of their heroes had done it, the Right would have supported him anyway and not trifled a second over it. Despite the Amnesty outrage and Chappaquiddick, I still don’t hate Teddy Kennedy. Maybe I should. But he was one of the greatest modern US liberal senators, always solid in his principles, and rarely selling out to the Right or Far Right the way so many of these fake liberals like Chris Dodd, Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama do. He was a real liberal, always great on health care, the environment, gay rights, civil rights, you name it. He always stood up for and fought for poor, low income and working class people. I suppose that his immigration craziness was just part and parcel of his liberal. There is an interview with Michael Levin in a recent issue of American Renaissance where he says something very sensible about liberals. Liberals are wrong on race, he says, but they mean well. They have good intentions, in contrast to conservatives who are just flat out mean. This is important to note. Liberals like Kennedy honestly do not think or realize that legalizing 20 million illegals followed by 80 million chain immigrants is bad for America. They still believe in the Emma Lazarus and Statue of Liberty myth – “Give me your tired, your poor. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.” They don’t do it because they are White self-haters or anything like that. A Teddy Kennedy Presidency would have been a very interesting one, but after Chappaquiddick it was doomed. Teddy may have even been so liberal as to scale back US imperialism, something no liberal US President has ever done. Kennedy was an inveterate womanizer and tales about him are legendary. Once in the Senate Dining Room, a young female dived under the table to service him, hidden by the draping tablecloths. He especially loved young women, even into middle age and possibly beyond. I don’t care about this, and I wish I could emulate him. Teddy was a heavy drinker too, an Irishman. You could see the damage the booze had done to him later in his puffy and reddened face. Nevertheless, he lived to age 77, and was finally killed by a brain tumor, not booze. He was ill in recent days, and last week, he took time off from the Senate for medical reasons. In less than a fortnight, he was gone, dead 11 PM PST last night. Teddy was well-liked by all of his fellow Congressmen, even his conservative enemies. He was part of their club. He apparently had a warm, charming, engaging and charismatic personality. Teddy was of course related to John F. Kennedy, assassinated US President and Robert F. Kennedy, assassinated US Presidential candidate front-runner. He was the Great Little Brother. RIP Teddy Kennedy.

Please follow and like us:
error3
fb-share-icon20
20
fb-share-icon20

10 thoughts on “Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (1932-2009)”

  1. Teddy Kennedy was a terrorist supporting scum bag. How many British lives were taken by bullets bought with American money fired by guns bought with American money or bombs created with ingredients bought with American money – a significant amount of which would not have been forthcoming but for his unequivocal support for violent, Marxist, anti-democratic Irish republicanism. When you take into account all his other crimes – leaving a girl to drown while his first thoughts were how to protect his political prospects, his entire shamelessly self serving career as a political parasite etc etc – he was clearly a quite repugnant human being.

  2. An ominous pattern is slowly emerging towards an inevitable power play on pushing another amnesty through Congress. We need to take the many consequences into consideration:
    1 We already had an enforceable 1986 law to stop the illegal immigrant invasion of our country, but it has been intentionally ignored? So–WHY–are they adamant in passing another immigration law?
    2. Most enforcement legislation has been crushed or weakened by many of the politicians we voted into office.
    3. That many of our own government members have pandered to the special interest lobbyists and not voters.
    4 For decades American taxpayers have been supporting, business welfare, who have never contributed to foreign national workers. That emergency hospitals, must attend any foreign person who enters its doors, illegal or legal? ICE should be on standby and demand who that individual is working for and subsequently make the employer pay instead of the taxpayers.
    5. That Democrats are downplaying that the 20 plus illegal immigrant families living here, will not have access to the health care reform package? But are not saying that if a new path to citizenship is enacted, they can automatically get health care?
    6. Should a new immigration reform package is passed, what’s stopping millions more poor, uneducated people storming the border.
    7. Why did Sen. Harry Reid, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the party try to dismantle E-Verify and under fund the border fence, so it was only a single layer instead of two tiers?
    8 That E-Verification is working and working well, so no wonder the US Chamber of Commerce, ACLU, Cato Institute and a large majority of anti-sovereignty groups have been involved in lawsuits, and questionable appeasement by politicians to kill the any enforcement laws.
    9. Why are we still inviting around a million new immigrants a year, when their are about 15 million jobless Americans? My health care experience was mainly in England, Germany and 15 months in Australia and prior to the mass European immigration invasion was positively first class. FIRST CLASS AND EXEMPLARY! THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS RATIONING?
    Of all the states that–SHOULD–be using E-Verify, is the illegal immigrant sanctuary state of California. Illegal immigration attributed to the near bankruptcy of California and is a prime example of intentionally ignoring immigration laws. The U.S. Census Bureau projections issued in the year 2000, that the United States is precisely on track to have a population of 1.182–BILLION–in the year 2100. So much for future American population is OVERPOPULATION.
    GET RAW ANSWERS AT NUMBERSUSA Contact those in WASHINGTON! NO MORE AMNESTIES. USE ATTRITION TO DEPORT ILLEGAL WORKERS THROUGH E-VERIFY, 287 G, NO MATCH SOCIAL SECURITY LETTERS AND LIGHTENING ICE RAIDS. CONTACT YOUR POLITICIAN 202-224-3121 AND DEMAND NO WEAKENING OF CURRENT 1986 (IRCA) OTHER SITES FOR INFORMATION IS HERITAGE FOUNDATION, JUDICIAL WATCH.

  3. Dear Robert
    As usual, you made many sensible comments, but your view of the Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 is rather one-sided. Its primary aim was to reduce immigration drastically. It turned the immigration flow into a trickle. After that, it was necessary to allocate the trickle, but the main purpose was to restrict immigration. If the intention of the act had been solely to keep South and East Europeans out of the US, it could simply have excluded immigration from those areas, as Asians had been excluded earlier, while allowing free entry from North Western Europe.
    This act, together with the Asian Exclusion Act, was the most worker-friendly piece of legislation in American history. The Asian Exclusion Act meant that American workers would no longer be exposed to wage-depressing competition from the teeming millions of Asia, and the immigration Restriction Act of 1924 had the effect of protecting American from the wage-depressing effects of the teeming millions of Europe as well.
    What changed since 1965 is not only that the allocation of immigrants was altered but also that their numbers were drastically increased. If you allow only a trickle of immigrants into the country, it doesn’t matter so much where they come from. The first aim of a worker-friendly immigration policy is to keep the number of immigrants very low. The rest is detail.
    Regards. James

    1. There was no such thing as the Asian Exclusion Act.
      It was called the “Chinese Exclusion Act”, targeting only the Chinese.

  4. Emma Lazarus and Statue of Liberty myth – “Give me your tired, your poor. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.”
    Emma Lazarus is a guess what? Three letters, starts with a J and end with W. Hint, missing letter is a E.
    What that jew text really means: Send us all your trash people and we will pay for them forever. You got what you wanted Robert L so why the hell are you complaining about it?
    ——–
    “NBF: The Racial Views of Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wCtvMS2XjA&feature=channel_page

  5. The IRA are/were just straightforward fascists, not Marxists though they pretend to be when convenient.
    ” He was a real liberal, always great on health care, the environment, gay rights, civil rights, you name it. He always stood up for and fought for poor, low income and working class people.”
    Yes he was a real ‘liberal’ – he promoted identity politics to divide the working class, while promoting union-busting to crush them. He had a big role in deregulating the air-traffic controllers and truckers with devastating results for both and the US working class in general. He was a cunt.

  6. Alex Cockburn speaks well for the “Left’ working man against Kennedy at his blog. Also puts in a good word against “hate laws” rarely seen by “lefties.”

  7. “At the time, the nation was so nuts about these groups that a proposal was made to sterilize them and to put them into camps to deal with them later. The model was eugenics, the same theory that drove the Nazis to their mass murder. The camps could have conceivably been used to kill these White inferiors, though that would have been odd. The nation was so in thrall to eugenics at the time and so contemptuous of these so-called inferior Whites that the only reason the proposal was shot down was that it would cost too much and require too much outlaw in manpower and materials.”
    You’re going to need a source if you’re going to say something that insane. I read and reviewed a biography of Madison Grant written by a leftist, and there was no mention of he or any other Nordicist advocating such a policy. You make it sound as if the White House was planning mass extermination but rejected the idea because of insufficient funds. Crazy.

Leave a Reply to littlebriton Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)