National Socialism Can Unfold In Any Society

People often wonder what fascism is, what Nazism* is, what National Socialism* is, what socialism is, what Communism is, etc.
The problem is that few people know the answers to these questions. Even I do not, really, but I know more than most people. Truth is that most humans do not have the foggiest understandings of what any of these things are. Perhaps if you actually experience them, then you can begin to understand them.
In particular, the US Right in recent decades has decided to rewrite all prior political thought and marry Communism and Fascism, Socialism and National Socialism. It’s part of the Right’s war on the Left, but anyone serious about politics knows that fascism and National Socialism are on the Far Right wing of the political spectrum. All real fascists and national socialists know this very well; they have no illusions that they are a leftwing movement. The Left is their enemy; this is not controversial.
Even people who are quite intelligent and educated typically do not really understand what any of these things are, especially if they are on the US (non-fascist) Right. The US Right has so mangled and married all of these concepts in recent decades that it’s no wonder American Rightists are confused.
The Left is just as guilty. They are always screaming fascist and Nazi at many US Rightists and conservatives who surely are neither. So most people on the Left don’t know fascism or Nazism from a hole in the ground either.
I shock people when I say, matter of factly, that National Socialism can unfold in any society. Even with Jews. Jewish National Socialism is surely possible. Nazism was only the German version of National Socialism. National Socialism can be developed to the needs of any society and anti-Semitism is by no means a necessary or sufficient ingredient.
Jewish National Socialism would obviously not be anti-Semitic, and non-Jews could easily come up with a philo-Semitic and Jewish-allied National Socialism if they so wished.
So what is National Socialism then? It’s a form of fascism, a rather aberrant and unusual form of it. Perhaps it is best to try to understand it in an intuitive and female sense. Let us just read some National Socialist passages and try to glean a “gestalt” or “feel” of it, since it is so difficult to describe in words.
Here, from Faith and Action, a pamphlet from 1938 Germany:

You carry in your blood the holy inheritance of your fathers and forefathers. You do not know those who have vanished in endless ranks into the darkness of the past. But they all live in you and walk in your blood upon the earth that consumed them in battle and toil and in which their bodies have long decayed. Your blood is therefore something holy. In it your parents gave you not only a body, but your nature.
To deny your blood is to deny yourself. No one can change it. But each decides to grow the good that one has inherited and suppress the bad. Each is also given will and courage. You do not have only the right, but also the duty to pass your blood on to your children, for you are a member of the chain of generations that reaches from the past into eternity, and this link of the chain that you represent must do its part so that the chain is never broken.
But if your blood has traits that will make your children unhappy and burdens to the state, then you have the heroic duty to be the last. The blood is the carrier of life. You carry in it the secret of creation itself. Your blood is holy, for in it God’s will lives.
Our highest treasure is the soul that we have been given. He who mixes his blood with that of foreign inferior races ruins the blood and soul that have been given to him to pass on in purity to his children. He makes his children impure and miserable, and commits the greatest crime that he as a National Socialist can commit.
But he who follows the laws of race fulfills the great commandment that only like should be brought together with like, keeping apart those things like fire and water which do not mix.
We see ourselves as integral with a unitary world around us, which evolves according to natural law. In the simplest words: There is only one reality, which we call Nature: not the “my reality” and “your reality” of the subjectivists and not the separate spiritual and physical realms of the supernaturalists. We are a part of Nature and subject to Nature’s laws.
Within the scope of these laws we are able to determine our own destiny. If we err in our efforts there is no one to protect us from the consequences of our folly or our weakness. In other words, we ourselves are responsible for everything over which we have the power of choice: in particular, for the state of our environment and for the destiny of our race.
A people grows from god’s will. Woe to him who wishes to destroy the peoples and make people alike. God created the trees, the bushes, the weeds and the grass not so that they could merge into one species, but that each should exist in its own way. Just as a tree, a people grows as a living whole from similar roots, but becoming one, it becomes the strongest of its kind.
All of the same blood belong to it. A people knows no state boundaries. It is bound by the ties of blood that bind all the sons of a single mother. A people cannot be destroyed as long as its roots draw on the strength of the earth. Summer and winter may come and go. But it always blooms anew in indestructible life and perfects itself in the strength that rises from its roots towards god’s will.
What does it mean when an individual dies? It is as if the wind blows leaves from a tree. New ones grow eternally every spring. The peoples are the greatest and most noble creation of god on this earth. There is no institution in the world, no party and no church, that has the right to make them the same or to rob them of even the tiniest bit of their individuality.

Does that give you a bit of a “feel” for the ideology? If you use your imagination, you can see that this political philosophy could be adopted for any society.
It’s also highly appealing. The modern demonization of Nazism is not a bad idea, but it is not very honest. We have turned National Socialism into some caricature demonic philosophy that only a sicko Satanist deviate could support.
The truth is so much more frightening.
These ideas took Germany by storm, and whatever modern-day Germanophiles tell you, National Socialism had majority support in the land.
Not only that, but National Socialism was adopted to the needs of many surrounding countries that become allies of the German state. It was very popular in these nations too. Where it did not hold state power, it had the support of significant minorities, even in the USSR and in neutral states like Sweden. Overseas, it was popular in Latin America. What looks like a strange Japanese version swept Japanese society with a mad fervor.
Whether it’s evil or not, it’s very appealing to many humans, and its appeal is probably universal and eternal now that the ideas have been birthed. That’s why it’s so damned dangerous and why all serious anti-fascists ought to familiarize themselves with the Beast of Many Forms.
*I can’t stand either Fascism or National Socialism, but I admit I am fascinated by them the way mice are fascinated by cats. One of the ways I am fascinated by them is that I am still trying to understand them, and have been for years now.

References

Stellrecht, Helmut. 1943. Glauben und Handeln. Ein Bekenntnis Der Jungen Nation. Berlin: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, Franz Eher Nachf.
Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

28 thoughts on “National Socialism Can Unfold In Any Society”

  1. National Socialism is not at all difficult to understand. You seem to be over-intellectualizing it.
    Each nation of course has major differences in culture and so on and thus various details are open to interpretation, but the simplest definition of National Socialism = “ethnic/racial nationalism” + “native/ethnic-specific socialism.”
    The “Socialism” of National Socialism is simply focused on the native majority ethnic/racial group, and at the same time a strong ethnic nationalism is spread amongst the populace in order to bind the native population together more collectively so that they’re more amenable to socialistic policies which benefit the native ethnic/racial majority.
    I think that National Socialism (“ethno-nationalism” + “native/ethnic-specific socialism” = National Socialism) is actually one of the best political and socioeconomic systems ever devised, and in the future (once the stigma of ‘THOSE EEEEVIL NAZIS!!!’ wears off more) it’ll hopefully be adopted by many nations worldwide.

  2. I should also add that one of the major appeals of National Socialism is actually it’s simplicity.
    NS is a political and economic system that many normal/everyday people can easily grasp the basics and basis of (as stated: ETHNO-NATIONALISM + ETHNO-SOCIALISM…it’s pretty simple, folks). The many manifestations of NS have actually brought more ‘power to the people’ than any so called modern ‘democracies’ have. In many respects it cannot be denied that countries which have adopted NS or one of its many variants are often more ‘democratic’ than modern ‘democratic’ nations like the USA or the UK, both of which are mostly ruled and run by a hyper-rich international/urban/elitist Jewish plutocrats and their allied managerial underlings.
    I should also add that I do not think that not all forms of NS are in any way dependent on dictatorial authoritarian leaders for their success.

  3. And this is just to say – if you’re trying to truly trying to describe and research the subject of 20th Century German National Socialism, you really ought to drop the words “Nazi” and “Nazism” entirely. The terms “Nazi”/”Nazism” are ridiculously loaded and biased terms. Those terms were invented and propagated by the Jew-infested mass-media by the 20th Century in the UK and the USA in order to poison the discourse surrounding the realities of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Even some etymologists are incorrect about the genesis of the word “Nazi”; for instance, see: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Nazi
    If you are talking or writing about German National Socialism of the 1930s-40s, PLEASE use the correct terminology (which is “German National Socialism,” “German National Socialists,” or, most correctly, the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”).
    The German National Socialists NEVER referred to themselves as “Nazis.” The word “Nazi” stems from the Medieval Hebrew-language word meaning “Germany,” which is “Ashkenaz” (which is also of course the root of the word “Ashkenazi,” as in “Ashkenazi [i.e., German/Rhineland] Jews.”
    Also, if you or others would like to better understand some of the basic building-blocks of German National Socialism, just read the 25 Point Program of the NSDAP – http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Program_of_the_NSDAP

  4. Me, I just don’t care about white women liking black cock. I don’t feel threatened by it. Me, I like any half-presentable pussy that will have me, and it doesn’t bother me that women feel the same about cock, or even that some prefer black cock. I actually generally seem to get on better with black women, and I don’t care to psycho-analyse myself to figure out why; probably just coincidence when you get down to it.
    National socialism is not necessarily a bad thing, unless you define it as nazism. That wasn’t really any sort of socialism; more of a one-nation toryism with some lashings of KKK ethnic supremacist bullshit. The ‘Tories’ are the UK equivalent (though not quite ) of the Republican party; the party of old money, the landed aristocracy, the public schools, Margaret Thatcher etc. ‘One-nation’ Toryism was a line of propaganda they used to trot out; you know – all pulling together for the common good, the street-sweeper’s contribution valued as highly as the stockmarket gambler (though not financially of course), no more of this divisive ‘class war’ stuff that only hurts us all. Of course, it’s a con, and it’s exactly the same con that Hitler pulled. Plus Hitler added on some mystical occultist bullshit like you quoted above. I feel that nazism is what the Tories would like to impose if they though they could get away with it, and indeed there have always been fringe tendencies in the Tory party with strong links to nazi-continuity.
    But another propaganda trick, as Robert noted, is to pretend that ALL attempts at national (or nationalist) socialism, or socialism in one country a la Soviet Union, are by definition a nazi ethnic supremacist project. The Trots are as guilty of this as the establishment. REAL national socialism is what the elites fear most, because it’s the only kind of socialism that’s possible – at least in the short run. You can’t look at a Trot magazine or website without getting some admonition against nationalist solutions – that will just lead to a repeat of the thirties, capitalist powers and their workers competing with each other leading to war… blah blah. But they DO advocate revolution, taking over the state. I could go on and on pointing out the contradictions and evasions, but the point is that you can’t ( I can’t anyway) pin them down to what it is they actually advocate – just that they’ve opposed every revolution that’s taken place and are opposed to any POSSIBLE steps forward. Maybe the workers will be driven to the ‘right’ because these organised cadres of bullshitters will make any serious left project impossible.

    1. No way, Miguel Serrano has got David Myatt beat by miles! That dude had some seriously weird ideas!
      Spiritual Hyperboreans floating around, Nazi UFOs under the ice caps waiting to arise and save the day, Leader Hitler traveling down something called the ‘Green Ray’ (I still am not sure what this is) to the Black Sun.
      The guy was so ‘out there’ that even people who just generally like Fantasy Literature, shorn of any interest in National Socialism, like him!

    2. Honestly, I think “whackjob” does not do him justice. He appears to have been on a multi- decade intellectual/spiritual journey that has taken him far beyond his NS/supremacist origins, through all sorts of twists and turns (his writings on “numinosity”, NS ethics,
      Islam, Buddhism, etc.), and finally ending up somewhere near the opposite place from where he started. I would call that an admirable and even noble journey.
      Very very few people are capable of real change. They seize upon some ideology or orientation or other, and NEVER LET GO. No matter what. So, when someone DOES change, I respect it — apart from the consideration of what, specifically, they changed from or to. To be able to change, from the strongly-held convictions of earlier years, shows character and deep commitment to truth — regardless, again, of specifically what one is changing
      from or to.
      This guy Myatt is, I submit, a man of quite some (inner) accomplishment. And btw some of his “numinosity” writings are well worth reading: http://www.numinousway.info
      Regarding his transformation:
      http://www.numinousway.info/pathei-mathos/change_perspective.html
      A Change of Perspective
      Over the past decade there has been, for me, a complete change of perspective, for I have gone from upholding and violently propagating the racialism of National-Socialism – and encouraging the overthrow of the existing status quo through revolutionary insurrection – to the acceptance of empathy and
      compassion, and to that gentle, quiet, desire to cease to
      cause suffering, which form the basis for what I have called The Numinous Way, with this Numinous Way being apolitical, undogmatic, and considering both race and “the folk” as unethical abstractions which move us away from empathy and compassion and which thus obscure our true human nature.
      […big snip… go to url for full text…]
      Hence, I have been, for many decades, wrong; misguided. Or, rather, I misguided myself, allowing idealism and a perceived duty to triumph over, to veil, my humanity. My good intentions were no excuse, even though, for nearly four decades, I made them an excuse, as idealists always do. For, during all the decades of my various involvements – of my arrogant interference based on some abstraction – I sincerely believed I was doing what was “right”, or “honourable”, and that such
      suffering as I caused, or aided, or incited, was “necessary” for some ideal to be born in some “future”.
      But now my inescapable reality is that of a personal empathy, a personal compassion, a simple, quiet, letting-be; a knowing that such answers as I have, now, are just my answers, and that I have no duty other than to be human, to gently strive to be a better human being through reforming myself by quietly cultivating empathy and compassion. Of course, I do not expect to be understood, and probably will continue to be judged, by others, according to some, or all, of my former beliefs,
      involvements.

  5. [I tried to post this comment, twice, but it did not show up. My bat-sense tells me it might be because of some idiotic word-count limit built in by wordpress. If so, then this two-part message — this one, followed by another — might bypass that…..]
    Bob:
    Honestly, I think “whackjob” does not do him justice. He appears to have been on a multi- decade intellectual/spiritual journey that has taken him far beyond his NS/supremacist origins, through all sorts of twists and turns (his writings on “numinosity”, NS ethics, Islam, Buddhism, etc.), and finally ending up somewhere near the opposite place from where he started. I would call that an admirable and even noble journey.
    Very very few people are capable of real change. They seize upon some ideology or orientation or other, and NEVER LET GO. No matter what. So, when someone DOES change, I respect it — apart from the consideration of what, specifically, they changed from or to. To be able to change, from the strongly-held convictions of earlier years, shows character and deep commitment to truth — regardless, again, of specifically what one is changing from or to.
    This guy Myatt is, I submit, a man of quite some (inner) accomplishment. And btw some of his “numinosity” writings are well worth reading:
    http://www.numinousway.info

  6. [david myatt, continued…]
    Regarding his transformation:
    http://www.numinousway.info/pathei-mathos/change_perspective.html
    A Change of Perspective
    Over the past decade there has been, for me, a complete change of perspective, for I have gone from upholding and violently propagating the racialism of National-Socialism – and encouraging the overthrow of the existing status quo through revolutionary insurrection – to the acceptance of empathy and compassion, and to that gentle, quiet, desire to cease to cause suffering, which form the basis for what I have called The Numinous Way, with this Numinous Way being apolitical, undogmatic, and considering both race and “the folk” as unethical abstractions which move us away from empathy and compassion and which thus obscure our true human nature.
    […big snip… go to url for full text…]
    Hence, I have been, for many decades, wrong; misguided. Or, rather, I misguided myself, allowing idealism and a perceived duty to triumph over, to veil, my humanity. My good intentions were no excuse, even though, for nearly four decades, I made them an excuse, as idealists always do. For, during all the decades of my various involvements – of my arrogant interference based on some abstraction – I sincerely believed I was doing what was “right”, or “honourable”, and that such suffering as I caused, or aided, or incited, was “necessary” for some ideal to be born in some “future”.
    But now my inescapable reality is that of a personal empathy, a personal compassion, a simple, quiet, letting-be; a knowing that such answers as I have, now, are just my answers, and that I have no duty other than to be human, to gently strive to be a better human being through reforming myself by quietly cultivating empathy and compassion. Of course, I do not expect to be understood, and probably will continue to be judged, by others, according to some, or all, of my former beliefs, involvements.

  7. PS: Troglodytes like “Hoff2” (above, in the comments)
    exemplify the type of NS-sympathizer that never would, and indeed never COULD, traverse a path of the sophistication and arduousness of Myatt’s. They are too retarded and lazy for such an effort. Myatt is a man of high, refined intelligence, and great mental stamina, far beyond anything of which Hoff2 is capable.

  8. I had a look at these David Myatt sites ” A National Socialist Jonathan Livingston Seagull ” LOL
    But this stuff from Alan rings a bell: ” Spiritual Hyperboreans floating around, Nazi UFOs under the ice caps waiting to arise and save the day, Leader Hitler traveling down something called the ‘Green Ray’ (I still am not sure what this is) to the Black Sun. ”
    Was there not a neo-nazi magazine called Black Sun?
    I just have vague recollections, pictures in my head of magazine covers I’ve seen somewhere – don’t remember where – with all this stuff and more; it makes nazism seem like fun SF stuff. There WAS a big occult element to German nazism, as parodied in the Raiders of the Lost Ark – I think they actually sent out expeditions to find an underground world and civilisation who entrance they believed was under the North Polar ice-cap.
    Alan – do you have any links to more info on these mags?

  9. There’s something fishy about David Myatt escaping prison for years and remaining free to preach jihad when equally gifted and eccentric extreme right wing British intellectuals like Simon Sheppard (of the “Heretical Two”) are rotting in prison for pamphleteering and cyber “hate” crimes. Sheppard’s “The Tyranny of Ambiquity” is just as dense and ideosyncratic as Myatt’s “The Numenous Way.” Violence isn’t in Sheppard’s vocabulary. But it’s always been an essential element of Mayatt’s political and metaphysical agenda whether National Socialist or Islamic. His Koran quoting logorrhea leaves me cold. I’d rather put myself to sleep with Michael Hoffman’s pilpul.
    “For well over a decade there have been rumors about whether or not David Myatt is an agent provocateur and/or an MI5 (or MI6) agent/covert operative.
    These rumors, apparently, derive from three causes.
    (1) His known involvement – in the 1970’s – with the para-military neo-nazi group Column 88, which, it has been alleged, was part of NATO’s European Gladio stay-behind network, whose task was to conduct assassinations and sabotage if the Soviet Union had invaded. Thus, Column 88 (C88) was, apparently, a joint MI5/MI6 operation, and was led by a former Special Forces army officer.
    (2) His interrogation, in the 80’s, by the Police – and later interview by a research assistant (Jenny Rathbone) from ITV’s World in Action (when Myatt denied everything) – about the murder of Hilda Murrell, when it was alleged that Myatt was employed as a deniable covert MI5 operative who was doing some of their “dirty work”. At the time of this murder, it was widely rumored that Murrell was “silenced” by MI5.
    (3) His involvement with Combat 18 (C18), which led to the formation of the National-Socialist Movement (NSM), of which he was the founder and first leader, and of which David Copeland, the London nail-bomber, was a member; for it was alleged that C18 was either set-up by MI5, or heavily infiltrated by MI5.
    In addition, there are the following circumstances: (a) Myatt’s many unexplained visits to Northern Ireland in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s; (b) his seemingly strange and sudden conversion to Islam some months after resigning from the leadership of the NSM; and (c) the fact that, although arrested, he was not prosecuted for either writing and distributing two terrorist documents attributed to him (A Practical Guide to Aryan Revolution, and the original booklet announcing the formation of The White Wolves) or for recruiting people to join his clandestine Aryan Resistance Movement.
    Such circumstances as these led one person to write, in 2005:
    ” Is Myatt an agent provocateur, a shit-disturber who can’t settle upon a radical philosophy, something more, or something less? It’s difficult to assess motive, but consider that he has been arrested numerous times for such things as writing and disseminating “practical terrorist guides” on suspicion of conspiracy to murder. These cases have always been dropped due to “lack of evidence.” Does he enjoy protection? The record is suggestive that he does. And if it appears so, then we should ask the next question: Why?
    Myatt may seem to have flitted from one politico-religious philosophy to another, but there is a terrible thread of continuity and rigour through his life and writings that suggests he is much more than a disingenuous provocateur. Naziism and Islamicism have served, in turn, as modalities of disruption for what remains at core an occult working to sow general chaos and division – the necessary passage of “Helter Skelter” to break down the Old Order, before the founding of the New.
    So again: whose interests are served by there being a David Myatt? Is he is own man – or men – or does he belong to someone else? Or is it something else – an intelligence service perhaps… ” (1)
    In this type of scenario, Myatt is alleged to be some kind of 5GW operative – someone who:
    ” …..does ’spooky action at a distance’ – who is acting on behalf of those “powers-behind-the-scenes” that like to use chaos, and especially socalled “terrorist attacks”, as a pretext for increased government control, increased surveillance, and government tyranny. That is, such an operative is a new version of the traditional “spook” – someone who works alone and is ruthless.” (2)
    http://aboutmyatt.wordpress.com/david-myatt-agent-provocateur/

  10. whodareswings – well, I find that plausible if Myatt was behind these magazines who covers I remember. The glossy covers looked just too expensive for any of these nazi nut sects.

  11. Nazi is yiddish and means Prince. Now all the jews are princes but their plan is to make every jew a king. Guess who these “kings” will rule.
    When the jews scream NAZI they are talking about themself. Jews are the real nazis.
    There is nothing complicated about communism, it’s judaism for stupid goyim consumption. lt’s all about jews taking control of the state and trick stupid goyim to help the jews to take control of the state – and hide from the stupid goyim that the jews are the state.

  12. Hey guys you do know that David Myatt started out as a SATANIST right? The reason he got into National Socialism and then Islam is it is a Role Playing thing for him. He is an evil SATANIST acting out the role of an ‘evil nazi who wants to gas Jews’ and ‘evil muslim who wants to push Jews into the sea’!!!
    This role playing thing is a big deal to some satanists, they use it to harness ‘dark energies’ or something along those lines and stuff like ‘bad vibes’ dude.
    My source for this is a book titled ‘Black Sun’ by Nicholas Goodrich-Clark, a good read for people interested in National Socialism and Racialism in general as you can get into some of the more esoteric aspects of things.
    http://books.google.com/books?id=xaiaM77s6N4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22Black+sun%22+goodrick+clarke

  13. National Socialism, and for the record any ideology advocating “direct democracy” and “more communication with the people”, pretty much amounts to mob rule. Unfortunately, such kind of ideas are attractive to the uneducated and the impoverished, meaning they can easily arise in times of crisis which was what happened in interwar Europe.
    About the subject of satanizing Nazism, i agree that it’s not very honest. But i disagree that it’s a good idea. As you pointed out, any society can fall into it, so trivializing the subject is about the worst one can do if one wishes to avoid the rise of such ideas. Nazism must be studied with all seriousness, as the friend white supremacist well recommends us, so we never fall again into the trap.

  14. Multi-culturalism must be fought with every bone in your body if you feel any responsability to your peaple proper.
    Black people were made slaves by white people and therefore feel “understandable” rage at the white system.
    –slavery happened 200 years ago (white slavery of blacks)–
    A self-depiction by the Muslims in Iberia. Taken from the “Tale of Bayad and Riyad”
    The Almoravides dynasty, c. 1100 CE. At the dynasty’s greatest expanse of control, a succession of Moroccan-based states strongly affected culture from modern Senegal to Iberia.The description Moors has referred to several historic and modern populations of Muslim (and earlier non-Muslim) people of Berber, Black African and Arab descent from North Africa, some of whom came to conquer and occupy the Iberian Peninsula for nearly 800 years.
    –vs “800” years of “black” occupation in white lands–
    “but that happened in the past” well guess what, SO DID SLAVERY!
    White people everywhere should be proud of taking blacks as slaves, it proves that we were stronger at the time, just as the moors were stronger in their time.
    Right and Wrong do not exist, we are actually no diffrent from animals contrary to popular belief and in nature the hungry fox does not let the bunny go because its defenseless and neither should we…

  15. “Jewish National Socialism would obviously not be anti-Semitic, and non-Jews could easily come up with a philo-Semitic and Jewish-allied National Socialism if they so wished.”
    Indeed, and up until the 1980s Israel did have basically a National Socialist system in place.
    Yet the weren’t called “Nazis”, wonder why that is I wonder.
    If any nation other than a Jewish one (European, Latin American, etc.) set up a National Socialist regime and nationalised their resources, etc. they would be branded “Nazi” and part on an axis of evil. The CIA would co-ordinate an overthrow in quick time.

  16. “National Socialism, and for the record any ideology advocating “direct democracy” and “more communication with the people”, pretty much amounts to mob rule. Unfortunately, such kind of ideas are attractive to the uneducated and the impoverished, meaning they can easily arise in times of crisis which was what happened in interwar Europe.”
    Yet educated people in peacetime are allowed to adopt National Socialism if they are Jews.

  17. “Whether it’s evil or not, it’s very appealing to many humans, and its appeal is probably universal and eternal now that the ideas have been birthed.”
    Probably because it is the best, or least worst, system going.
    To paraphrase that miscreant Churchill, National Socialism might be bad but consider the alternatives.
    Democracy and Capitalism lead to oligarchy and the plundering of a nation’s resources. This hurts the nation and in truth Democracy and Capitalism does not care for the nation, the general welfare of the people.

  18. @Robert
    This article is spot-on about National Socialism because it debunks the old myth that only whites can be Nazis (read : National Socialists)
    Considering that NS places a high value on blood and heritage,distaste for democracy and liberalism and utter disgust for blood contamination(read : miscegnation), it can acually unfold in any racially/ethnically homogeneous society.
    Japanese and Koreans are examples of who can be possible NSs. (even ethnic Jews can be NSs)
    Nation – People of same ethnicity: a community of people who share a common ethnic origin, culture, historical tradition, and, frequently, language, whether or not they live together in one territory or have their own government.

    1. Thank you! I am so glad you get it. I have told people this and they just look dumbfounded. Only Nazis can be National Socialists. Or the minorities can be cleansed so that only the pure people remain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *