I Finally Figured Out White Separatism and Nordic Separatism

Why do these White nationalists (overwhelmingly Nordicists) fear genetic destruction while no one else does? Because they think they are superior.
Why do the Nordicists alone of all of the White subgroups want to set up separate Nordic enclaves to keep the other White subgroups from breeding with them? Because they think they are the most superior Whites of them all, and they think all of the White groups are grotesquely inferior.
This is why only Whites are agitating for racial separatism (other than Jews). They are the only people on Earth who really believe deep down inside that they are scientifically, provably, better than anyone else, and at the same time, they are threatened with mass immigration into their lands, which threatens their genetic superiority, mostly through interbreeding.
And the Meds, Armenids, Arabs, Iranians and others are not agitating for separate homelands in the US. Why not? They don’t care if they breed in with other Whites. Why don’t they care? They don’t think they are superior to other Whites.
To WN’s, Whites breeding with any other race is destructive not due to genetic destruction (this is their big lie) but because said interbreeding will automatically mean Whites breeding in with inferior races, since all non-Whites are inferior.
To Nordicists, breeding in with any other White subrace is destructive not due to genetic destruction (this is their big lie) but because said White interbreeding will automatically mean Nordics breeding in with inferior White subgroups, since all other White subgroups are grotesquely inferior.
Nordicists are really the only significant sub-movement in US White nationalism. In the US, there really is not any mirror movement of say Meds, Slavs, Armenids, Iranids, Berberids, Arabids, Dinarics, Alpines or whatever. Why not? Those White people don’t think they are superior to other Whites and they pretty much could care less about White interbreeding. You only care about interbreeding if you think you’re superior.
And Nordicism is all about superiority. It’s not about celebration of their culture or any of that crap. They’re the only real White people, and all the rest are mongrels, part-muds, part-niggers, part-Asians, etc. Why are they the only real ones? Because only they are pure. The rest are somewhat contaminated, and hence partially degenerated and part-destroyed.
It’s amazing that it took me so damn long to figure that out.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

36 thoughts on “I Finally Figured Out White Separatism and Nordic Separatism”

  1. The med race is safe because its purest form is the arab race and it is protected by the fact that arabs are anti-globlization.
    Slavs are safe just because of russia. It’s a huge country.
    Nords don’t have those kinds of numbers. Plus many northwestern europeans have some nordish traits but not the full aggregate nordic phenotype. Nords are not really a separate race but a collection of traits. Combine this with the fact that many nordic traits, such as extreme depigmentation, are recessive, and you can see they aren’t breathing as comfortably as slavs and meds.

    1. I see. I still think it’s due to supremacy. There can be no other reason that I can think of off the bat. Thing is though that there are lots more ethnic groups who are way more endangered than these folks, and as a general rule, none of them really give a shit too much about interbreeding with other groups. They do want to preserve their languages, but interbreeding really gets in the way of that. I don’t know that many who are concerned about preserving their specific genetic line or phenotype or genetic tribe or subrace. In fact, I can’t think of one. It’s only the Nordicists. Cuz they think they are better than anyone else. That’s the only reason.

    2. Tuaregs are not White. They are 86% Black. I have a post on that somewhere. No Med would ever consider those people to be part of the Med race.
      The Arab and Berber Meds are kind of a tough call, but it’s clear that the Whiter ones are obviously a mostly-Caucasian people. You get into trouble with the ones who look pretty Black, like some Berbers in Morocco and quite a few Egyptians and Yemenis. You really have to go by phenotype.
      The ones that are mostly White are obviously a variety of White people, but once you get into the ones that are pretty Black, it’s pretty nuts to call them any kind of White person, Med or not.
      It’s totally obvious to me anyway that there are lots of White Berbers and White Arabs. They look as White as an Italian or Iberian. It’s preposterous to call them non-Whites. As an example of a White Arab, look at Bashar Asad, the Syrian President, and his father. Obviously White people. To me, Saddam was a White man too. You almost have to look at them on an individual basis over there.

    3. I’m not sure that most even tribes care that much about race. I mean, they don’t think of this in genetic, blood, racial terms like these insane White nationalists. Most tribes, well, you can nontribals can marry in, but you need to assimilate, that is, adopt their culture and speak their language. I would be surprised if many tribes in the world had some rule that disallows nontribals from marrying in. Why don’t you point out some to me?
      I’m aware of some Indian tribes in Arizona. These tribes mostly think of their continuity in terms of continuing to speak their language and pursue their culture. If you investigate them, you will probably find that many nontribals have married in, but in the best case,the nontribals had adopt the language of the ethnic group and also adopt their culture.
      Most humans don’t really think in terms of genes and blood and whatnot. Mostly only White nationalists, Nazis, a few others. Maybe Orthodox Jews, but they are pretty Nazi-like. Japanese too, but they are viciously racist.
      In many cases, small languages are dying all over the world, especially in the US, in Siberia, Latin America, SE Asia. It’s true that interbreeding is a big part of it. The ethnic group’s members are simply marrying out. When they do, the member of the ethnic group stops speaking their language or won’t pass it on to the kids, since they married a nonethnic.
      So the language dies, and it’s true that intermarriage is a big reason. But there don’t seem to be any big movements against intermarriage. In fact, I can’t think of any offhand. Even Jews square the circle of the intermarriage question by asking the Gentile woman to convert and raise the kids Jewish. In this way, they blow off blood, but keep the tribe going via religious conversion.
      And Japanese in the West are marrying out at huge rates, almost all Japanese women marrying White men.
      Truth is that the sort of phobia about marrying out that the White nationalists have is nonadaptive in human terms. Human tribes have always married out. Those that don’t get fucked hard by inbreeding, like the Jews. Primitive man figured out inbreeding problems real quick.

  2. I don’t see Nordicism as some major movement. It’s pretty small actually, compared with white nationalism, which is still small, with probably only 1-2% of white Americans. The major trend within American white nationalism is “pan-Aryanism”, where if your ancestors are from Europe, then you’re in, basically. Nordicists are generally not allowed on sites like Stormfront.
    Anyway, Scandinavian countries (also Holland and northern Germany) are small and only 30% of the people there are really “Nordic” in terms of blond hair, blue eyes, and “dolichocephalic” skull shape. This phenotype could easily be completely submerged overnight by non-white immigration, which is actually what a lot of people would like to see. Anti-Nordicism is *far* more common than Nordicism – I mean, who the hell are we kidding here, really? Lots of people (Jews especially) absolutely hate blond-haired men. Just look at the portrayal of blond men in Hollywood – pretty much always as idiots or villains. Lots of people are absolutely gleeful at the prospect of “the browning of America”, and of filling up even Europe with non-white immigrants.

  3. Thing is though that there are lots more ethnic groups who are way more endangered than these folks, and as a general rule, none of them really give a shit too much about interbreeding with other groups. They do want to preserve their languages, but interbreeding really gets in the way of that.
    Nonsense. Give examples. Nobody wants their ethnic group to die out, except stupid honkies.
    I don’t know that many who are concerned about preserving their specific genetic line or phenotype or genetic tribe or subrace. In fact, I can’t think of one. It’s only the Nordicists. Cuz they think they are better than anyone else. That’s the only reason.
    I’m not a Nordicist, but to be fair, the “Nordic” phenotype is pretty unique among the world’s peoples. Most Nordicists do not really meet the criteria for being Nordic themselves – the leadership of the Nazis in Germany is a good example. Not really a true Nordic type among them.

    1. You mean you actually like and will befriend and hang out with Copts and Maronites, silver?
      Personally, I love Egyptians. I had an Egyptian gf once. She was sort of part-Black. Maybe 25% Black? Hard to say. Muslim, originally from Cairo. She was a cool chick, man! A real traditional feminine woman, didn’t try to be a man, didn’t emasculate you, wasn’t a bitch. I was the man and she was the woman. IOW, unlike most of these White bitches around here, LOL.
      I really like those Copts too. Those are some really cool people, and they like other Christians. Maronites, to me, are obviously White. They’re basically the same as Greeks. If Greeks are White, then Maronites are White too.

    2. Reader: “Most Nordicists do not really meet the criteria for being Nordic themselves – the leadership of the Nazis in Germany is a good example. Not really a true Nordic type among them.”
      Please learn the facts before you spout off your inaccuracies.
      Many National Socialist leader had Nordic physical features. Just because ALL of them weren’t stereotypical Nordics (tall and thin, blond haired, blue eyed, and long-skulled, etc) doesn’t mean they weren’t Nordic at all. Also, the National Socialist elite, the SS, were going to be the future leaders of NS Germany and they were all very Nordic until the last 3-4 years of the war – and the selection process for that group was very strict in relation to Nordic features. They were so strict in regards to physical health that I remember reading once that they couldn’t enter the SS if they had more than 1-2 cavities in their life!
      The bottom 3/4 of Germany is mostly Alpine, though with a strong Nordic mixture there – the top 1/4 of Germany is still mostly Nordic. Germany is today still a country filled with people who are mixed Whites (mixed between Alpines and Nordics).
      Even Hitler had some Nordic features. Do the research before you spout off.
      Hitler obviously didn’t have blond hair, but he did have brown hair that was light brown with blondish elements when he was younger and which became darker brown as he aged. Even in to his 40s/50s his hair apparently still had a light brown/blondish tint to it. You can’t tell from old photographs much about Hitler’s light hair or eye color (or that of anyone else, for that matter) because of BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPHY.
      Hitler also had very blue eyes, as every eyewitness account of the people who met him up close stated. Many described his eyes as “hypnotically blue.” The TIME magazine cover from 1945 that shows him with brown eyes is totally wrong – http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1945/1101450507_400.jpg – what a great example of Jewish journalistic accuracy!
      Please learn the facts before you spout off your ignorant opinions about the non-Nordic physical appearance of Hitler and others.
      ANYONE on Earth who has non-brown eyes, hair that isn’t black or very dark brown, and is of above-average height (in global terms) has some Nordic ancestry in their background. Nordic physical appearance is on a continuum from the very Nordic (recent or present total Nordic ancestry) to the barely Nordic (Nordic ancestry from a long time ago).

      The brilliant American writer Lothrop Stoddard traveled as an objective journalist to National Socialist Germany in 1940 (he was not pro-Nazi either before or after visiting Germany). During his time there he was able to interview Hitler up close and in person…this is how he described Hitler’s personal appearance:
      “At the far end of the room was a flat-topped desk from behind which a figure rose as I entered and came towards me. I saw a man of medium height, clad in a plain officer’s tunic with no decorations save the Iron Cross, black trousers, and regulation military boots. Walking up to where I had halted near the doorway, he gave me a firm handshake and a pleasant smile. It was the Fuehrer.
      Even more interesting than what Hitler said was his whole manner and appearance. Here I was, in private audience with the Master of Greater Germany, and able to study him at close range. Needless to say, I watched intently his every move and listened with equal intent-ness to his voice. Let me try to depict as clearly as possible what I observed.
      There are certain details of Hitler’s appearance which one cannot surmise from photographs. His complexion is medium, with blond-brown hair of neutral shade which shows no signs of gray. His eyes are very dark-blue. Incidentally, he no longer wears a cartoonist’s mustache. It is now the usual “tooth-brush” type, in both size and length. As already remarked, his uniform is severely plain and seemingly of stock materials.
      In ordinary conversation, Hitler’s voice is clear and well-modulated. Throughout the audience he spoke somewhat rapidly, yet never hurriedly, and in an even tone. Only occasionally did I detect a trace of his native Austro-Bavarian accent. The audience was not a monologue. Although naturally he did most of the talking, Hitler gave me plenty of chances to ask questions and put in my say. He did not at any time sharply raise his voice. Only when discussing the war did it become vibrant with emotion; and then he dropped his voice almost to an intense whisper. He made practically no gestures, sitting for the
      most part quietly, with one hand resting on the arm of his chair and the other lying relaxed in his lap.
      Hitler’s whole appearance was that of a man in good health. He certainly did not look a day older than his fifty years. His color was good, his skin clear and un-wrinkled, his body fit and not
      over-weight. He showed no visible signs of nervous strain, such as pouched eyes, haggard lines, or twitching physical reactions. On the
      contrary, appearance, voice, and manner combined to give an impression of calmness and poise.
      I am well aware that this description tallies neither with current ideas nor with reports of other persons who have seen and talked with him. Very likely those reports are just as true
      as mine, since Hitler is said to be a man of many moods. Perhaps I saw him on one of his good days; perhaps, he intended to make a particular
      impression upon me. All I can do is to describe accurately what I myself saw and heard.”
      SOURCE = http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0300731.txt
      Keep in mind that the above description was written before the massive stress caused by the protracted war took a huge physical toll on Hitler’s health and appearance.

  4. This is why only Whites are agitating for racial separatism (other than Jews). They are the only people on Earth who really believe deep down inside that they are scientifically, provably, better than anyone else, and at the same time, they are threatened with mass immigration into their lands, which threatens their genetic superiority, mostly through interbreeding.
    This is stupid. No non-white country is allowing itself to be overrun with foreigners, although pretty much all white countries (especially NW European-derived countries) are. Racialism is normal and healthy.

  5. This is why only Whites are agitating for racial separatism (other than Jews). They are the only people on Earth who really believe deep down inside that they are scientifically, provably, better than anyone else..
    Hardly so, Japanese and Chinese tend to think they’re superior although the latter seems to emphasize culture more than genetics.
    Also woven into the upper castes of India is a pretty strong sense of separatism and a little less so superiority but that is there in some of them.

  6. Thing is though that there are lots more ethnic groups who are way more endangered than these folks, and as a general rule, none of them really give a shit too much about interbreeding with other groups. In fact, I can’t think of one. It’s only the Nordicists.
    Japanese and orthodox Jews come to mind…

  7. Dear Robert
    You are right in that interbreeding can have different consequences for different populations. To use an analogy, let’s take 3 alcoholic beverages: beer, wine and vodka, with respectively 5%, 15% and 40% alcohol. What are the consequences of mixing these beverages in terms of alcohol content? It all depends. For vodka, mixture means a lowering of alcohol content; for beer it means an increase; and for wine it could go either way.
    Similarly, race-mixing can be disadvantageous for the superior races but advantageous for the inferior. If the Nordics are really superior, which I don’t believe, then miscegenation will indeed result in an impoverishment of their gene pool, but only and only if it is done randomly.
    If Swedes are superior to Italians, but only the best and brightest Italians go to Sweden, then the gene pool of the Swedes will be enriched. If team A is superior to team B and if team A gets the best player from team B, then team A may actually become a better team.
    The Nordicists commit the fallacy of distribution, that is, they attribute qualities which belong to the group as a whole to each individual member of the group. The mistake of nearly all groupist is that they overlook overlap. There is no harm in noticing differences between groups as long as you also notice the usually far larger differences within groups. Men are taller than women, yes, but only on average. The average height difference between the sexes is about 12 cms, but the height difference between the tallest and the shortest man in the world is more than 120cms.
    What makes Nordicists ridiculous in an American context is that they are a minority and that they long ago lost their Nordic purity, if such purity ever existed, which I doubt very much. The most divisive people in the US today are the Nordicists. They are even worse than those conservatives who don’t regard liberals as real Americans. If even liberals aren’t real Americans, what is a leftist like you? An alien?
    Have a good day. James

  8. The irony with Nordicism is that most of it’s advocates are not Nordic themselves. They align themselves with a mythical blonde north, but don’t quite have the right genetic or cultural connections.
    Two examples, to do with runes:
    * Hitler. Black-haired German. His whole movement was based on retrofitting Scando mythology onto Germany. Hence the runes for life and death on German army tombstones.
    * Nick Griffin (BNP leader). Black-haired Anglo. Edited ‘The Rune’ magazine, which mixed nationalism with mystic Nordicism.
    Scandinavia is one of the mythical magnets of the world, which attracts the deluded looking for some kind of identity. Other magnets include:
    * Israel (for Ashkenazi and Christians)
    * Egypt (for Black Americans.. “Cleopatra was black, so am I … don’t you see?”)
    * Ethiopia (for Jamaicans)
    * Alexander-period Greece (for FYR Macedonians)
    But none are particularly connected.

    1. sandra: “Hitler. Black-haired German”
      Hey Sandra, please do the research instead of continuing to spread historical inaccuracies – Hitler had light brown/dark blond hair that got darker as he aged, NOT black hair. He also had very blue eyes. Read the description that I posted in the above comment. Actually, I’ll just post it here again because it bears repeating (and maybe Mr. Lindsay would do us a favor and compose a post clearing up the persistent inaccuracies regarding Hitler’s non-Nordic appearance):
      Even Hitler had some Nordic features. Do the research before you spout off.
      Hitler obviously didn’t have blond hair, but he did have brown hair that was light brown with blondish elements when he was younger and which became darker brown as he aged. Even in to his 40s/50s his hair apparently still had a light brown/blondish tint to it. You can’t tell from old photographs much about Hitler’s light hair or eye color (or that of anyone else, for that matter) because of BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPHY.
      Hitler also had very blue eyes, as every eyewitness account of the people who met him up close stated. Many described his eyes as “hypnotically blue.” The TIME magazine cover from 1945 that shows him with brown eyes is totally wrong – http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1945/1101450507_400.jpg – what a great example of Jewish journalistic accuracy!
      Please learn the facts before you spout off your ignorant opinions about the non-Nordic physical appearance of Hitler and others.
      ANYONE on Earth who has non-brown eyes, hair that isn’t black or very dark brown, and is of above-average height (in global terms) has some Nordic ancestry in their background. Nordic physical appearance is on a continuum from the very Nordic (recent or present total Nordic ancestry) to the barely Nordic (Nordic ancestry from a long time ago).

      The brilliant American writer Lothrop Stoddard traveled as an objective journalist to National Socialist Germany in 1940 (he was not pro-Nazi either before or after visiting Germany). During his time there he was able to interview Hitler in-person and up close…this is how he described Hitler’s personal appearance:
      “At the far end of the room was a flat-topped desk from behind which a figure rose as I entered and came towards me. I saw a man of medium height, clad in a plain officer’s tunic with no decorations save the Iron Cross, black trousers, and regulation military boots. Walking up to where I had halted near the doorway, he gave me a firm handshake and a pleasant smile. It was the Fuehrer.
      Even more interesting than what Hitler said was his whole manner and appearance. Here I was, in private audience with the Master of Greater Germany, and able to study him at close range. Needless to say, I watched intently his every move and listened with equal intent-ness to his voice. Let me try to depict as clearly as possible what I observed.
      There are certain details of Hitler’s appearance which one cannot surmise from photographs. His complexion is medium, with blond-brown hair of neutral shade which shows no signs of gray. His eyes are very dark-blue. Incidentally, he no longer wears a cartoonist’s mustache. It is now the usual “tooth-brush” type, in both size and length. As already remarked, his uniform is severely plain and seemingly of stock materials.
      In ordinary conversation, Hitler’s voice is clear and well-modulated. Throughout the audience he spoke somewhat rapidly, yet never hurriedly, and in an even tone. Only occasionally did I detect a trace of his native Austro-Bavarian accent. The audience was not a monologue. Although naturally he did most of the talking, Hitler gave me plenty of chances to ask questions and put in my say. He did not at any time sharply raise his voice. Only when discussing the war did it become vibrant with emotion; and then he dropped his voice almost to an intense whisper. He made practically no gestures, sitting for the
      most part quietly, with one hand resting on the arm of his chair and the other lying relaxed in his lap.
      Hitler’s whole appearance was that of a man in good health. He certainly did not look a day older than his fifty years. His color was good, his skin clear and un-wrinkled, his body fit and not
      over-weight. He showed no visible signs of nervous strain, such as pouched eyes, haggard lines, or twitching physical reactions. On the
      contrary, appearance, voice, and manner combined to give an impression of calmness and poise.
      I am well aware that this description tallies neither with current ideas nor with reports of other persons who have seen and talked with him. Very likely those reports are just as true
      as mine, since Hitler is said to be a man of many moods. Perhaps I saw him on one of his good days; perhaps, he intended to make a particular
      impression upon me. All I can do is to describe accurately what I myself saw and heard.”
      SOURCE = http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0300731.txt
      Keep in mind that the above description was written before the massive stress caused by the protracted war took a huge physical toll on Hitler’s health and appearance.

  9. It’s to do with hygiene. White = clean , physically and morally. Also green and blue eyes are cleaner than brown eyes. From France south and east, people get increasingly oilier, swarthier, greasier, slimier, wilier (as in Wily Oriental Gentleman ) and darker of course. This also corresponds to a weakening of character. The Nordic is honest, honourable and heroic; the French are surrender monkeys, so too the Italians, and it only gets worse the further south and east you get – the East Asians have only a light coating of grease, but enough to signify a moral turpitude as evidenced by their incredible cruelty. As you get farther south, the grease gets thicker and darker until you get the Negro who is completely saturated and whose grease has baked in the sun and set hard like ancient grease you find behind the cooker; hence the negro, though lowest in moral fibre, is less wily and devious, because his oil doesn’t flow any more ( metaphorically speaking of course) and can actually be led to productive work under the supervision of the enlightened Nordic. The others are treacherous and best avoided.
    ‘Why’ is for the scientists to figure out, but the basic principle is that the less pigment in skin (and eyes ) the better the character. That is the source of the superiority of the Nordic. I hope that was clear.

    1. And hey LS…don’t knock “grease” (natural skin oils) so much – the stuff is good for human skin and keeps it supple, which means oily/greasy skinned people age much slower than people with very rough/dry skin.
      Nords age faster than nearly every other racial/ethnic group on Earth because of their very dry (un-oily) skin plus their skin paleness (very sensitive to too much sun exposure). This is especially true if they emigrate from their native Northern European habitats for which they are physically adapted (which are foggy, rainy, damp/humid, and cloudy/unsunny) to very hot/sunny/equatorial and/or dry/non-humid areas. Climates with very strong sunlight of course severely damage pale White skin tones, but if the area is not sufficiently humid or moist it also dries out White skin a whole lot as well. Those two things combined, extreme sunniness along with low humidity, cause Whites (especially Nordics) to age with frightening rapidity. However, I think that Whites/Nordics can deal OK with dry/non-humid climates as long as the sun is not also too strong there.
      I’d like to someday conduct scientific studies (perhaps after we pro-Whites eventually seize power in the USA) on the major differences that American Whites exhibit in terms of aging and health depending on the specific region(s) of the USA in which they have been born, grown up, and lived. It’s quite predictable that Whites who have lived in the cloudy/rainy/foggy Pacific Northwest or Upper-Central Plains regions of the USA (similar to the weather in Northern Europe) age MUCH slower than Whites who live in the very hot/dry/sunny areas of Texas/New Mexico/Arizona or the extremely hot/sunny yet humid state of Florida.

  10. LS: “the basic principle is that the less pigment in skin (and eyes ) the better the character. That is the source of the superiority of the Nordic. I hope that was clear.”
    So I take it that you are a strong believer in the ancient art/science of physiognomy, LS?

    1. Even if he was joking, physiognomy is still a fascinating area of study – have you ever researched it Mr. Lindsay?

  11. I’m confident that in the future physiognomy (like some parts of astrology) will be proven to be partially true and thus will be slowly accepted as quasi-scientific.
    Some physiognomic beliefs (as well as ancient astrological doctrine) already have been proven correct; see:
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126957.300-how-your-looks-betray-your-personality.html?full=true
    http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displayStory.cfm?story_id=11959198 & http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/sciencenews/3350019/A-rounder-face-means-men-are-more-aggressive.html
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7884223.stm
    http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2006/0106_0800_0902.pdf

  12. Your entire rant was so ridiculously absurd and full of contradictions and half truths. I dont feel like wasting my time picking it apart. So ill keep it short and sweet.
    “This is why only Whites are agitating for racial separatism (other than Jews)”
    You clearly are from LA. Only someone in the heart of Modern day Babylon would be so affected and traumatized by this rubbish. You do implicate Jewish supremacist along with Nordic, which i find odd.
    Anyways, your view of so called Nordicism is very hollywoodish. Its no surprise you live in LA, the heart of Jewish satire gutter publications.
    From the beginning of your rant, you clam only the Whites have this weird desire to continue their Culture and Heritage. Because thats what it is. No matter what other diabolical term you try to spin it as; to make it fit your own fanatical gibbering perspective. Nordicism is nothing more then Culture and Heritage. Which is obviously found in all peoples of the world.
    Like i said, you have a very Hollywoodish/American Tabloid perspective.
    Every race and culture fights for its survival and will continue to do so. The “New World” of America is still a Experiment. Which is failing rapidly. The more they try to destroy all cultures and merge everyone into a milkshake of humanity.. the more people resist.
    What you have in America today is total segregation. Been to a high school launch room lately? Who’s sitting with who? Exactly…
    No amount of Federal Laws will change Cultural and Human interaction. Why dont the Mexicans get along with the Blacks in California?
    Clearly the Mexicans must think they’re ‘Superior’ to the Blacks, yes? No they dont. What you are seeing is a subconscious instinct to ‘be with your own kin’
    Now, we can go into all the rubbish that the socialist communist believe in. We all know how well the “Utopia” worked in Russia dont we? lol, Shortest lived ideology in the word history. 80yrs?
    It took 80yrs to realize the Jewish Utopia for Mankind is complete rubbish (1991 russian utopia crashes) Of course it was never really a Utopia for Mankind.. it was really a Utopia for the Jews. But thats another topic lol.
    Anyways, my point is every race, culture, religion, and group will fight for its survival. Thats the root of the answer you’re looking for.
    You’re saying to yourself. “But thats so basic” Yeah, it is basic. Life is basic. When things get UN-basic… well, thats called politics and subversion. The problem with far far left liberal academic types, is they have no experience in the real world. They tend to really get stuck on issues of who thinks they’re superior to who, and that person this.. or that person believes this. When in fact, it’s themselves who believe they’re superior to others.

    1. Wait! You’re the Nazi, right? Remind me once again why I should bother having an argument, much less giving the time of day to, a Nazi like you?
      You do implicate Jewish supremacist along with Nordic, which i find odd.
      Nothing odd at all. There’s Judeo-Nazis, and there’s real Nazis. They’re not really extremely different. Think about it.
      Anyways, your view of so called Nordicism is very hollywoodish.
      Well, actually it was gleaned from the study over many months of Nordicists on the Net and in my own comments section.
      Its no surprise you live in LA,
      I don’t live in LA anymore. I live in Madera, Mexifornia.
      Every race and culture fights for its survival and will continue to do so.
      I don’t think so. This is one of your Nazi lies. My study of many cultures around the world shows that most don’t give a shit about genetics. They care about language and culture, that’s it.
      From the beginning of your rant, you clam only the Whites have this weird desire to continue their Culture and Heritage.
      Wrong. Most people want to keep this going. You Nazis want to preserve your fucking genetic bloodline! This is where you part company with the rest of humanity and join the Orcs.
      Nordicism is nothing more then Culture and Heritage
      Nope. With you NAZIS, and that’s what a Nordicist is, a NAZI, it’s all about das blut, the blood.
      The “New World” of America is still a Experiment. Which is failing rapidly.
      This is another one of your lies. That we are doing something new here. Nonsense. Multiracial empires have always existed.
      What you have in America today is total segregation. Been to a high school launch room lately? Who’s sitting with who? Exactly…
      At any rate, it’s much, much better, and fairer, for Blacks that the previous set up.
      Why dont the Mexicans get along with the Blacks in California?
      Well, they get along just fine in my California town. You know, there’s always going to be ethnic confict, there’s no escaping from it.
      Clearly the Mexicans must think they’re ‘Superior’ to the Blacks, yes? No they dont.
      In the areas where they are fighting, INDEED the Mexicans think they are superior. They are disgusted by Black behavior and think that Blacks are sickeningly inferior. They don’t have White hangups about race. They embrace racism without hangups.
      Yes, I see, Judeo-Bolshevism. You really are a Nazi, aren’t you?
      Anyways, my point is every race, culture, religion, and group will fight for its survival.
      Actually, this is another one of your evil Nazi lies. Sure, most cultures want to persist, but a lot of them go out anyway, and there’s not much they can do about it. Few ethnics around the world are ready to take up arms and fight to preserve their bloodlines. Except you NAZIS that is.
      Truth is, this whole, “we just want to preserve out bloodline” (I mean culture!) is just one more of your vile Nazi lies. The only reason you want to preserve your precious genes is because you think that your Nordic supergenes are better than those of every other human group on Earth. That’s why you are Nordicist-Nazis. To preserve your supremacist genes. Face it.

  13. RL: “Multiracial empires have always existed.”
    A quick history lesson as an example of the ultimate fate of multiracial empires…during the waning centuries/decades Roman Empire, the overall population of the Empire of course became more and more multiracial/multiethnic as various “immigrants,” colonizers, and invaders entered the Empire. Additionally, various Roman Emperors and general leaders of that empire became increasingly non-White as the Empire neared its end.
    But OH YEAH…is there any use arguing with a person who believes that the leaders/elite of the Roman Empire at its beginning and height were of Southern Euro/Med ethnic extraction and not of predominately Northern European ethnic background? This despite all evidence to the contrary? See busts/portraits @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Roman_Emperors

  14. Sometimes it is experience “in the real world” that convinces some of us that groups are more alike than some care to admit.

  15. “Wait! You’re the Nazi, right? Remind me once again why I should bother having an argument, much less giving the time of day to, a Nazi like you?”
    Wait! did i scare you with common sense? Scare you so much that you subconsciously need to go on the defensive and resort to playground gymnastics? Dont let your eyes pop out of your sockets now. Didn’t your mother ever tell you, its not nice to point your finger?
    “Nothing odd at all. There’s Judeo-Nazis, and there’s real Nazis. They’re not really extremely different. Think about it.”
    Someone such as yourself, a far far left, un-experienced, pseudo-academic, “pro-jew” (whatever that means) self proclaimed Marxist radical using the term “Judeo-Nazi’s”… Is odd. Especially when that person lives in the epicenter of Jewish mass media.
    “Well, actually it was gleaned from the study over many months of Nordicists on the Net and in my own comments” section.”
    Was it. For a few months of ‘internet’ study you sure make some ridiculously astounding accusations. A few months of Internet study isn’t exactly what i would call real world experience. But dont let real life, get in the way of your make believe, hocus pocus, notebook social diagram. (This would be another area to scream and call me names, because you cant express your failed logic. Heads up.)
    “I don’t live in LA anymore. I live in Madera, Mexifornia.”
    Not anymore perhaps. But the lasting effects show in your thought process and writing here. Mexifonia? That’s rather standoffISH . Do you have issues with Aztecans? Seems rather hypocritical. Why am i not surprised.
    “I don’t think so. This is one of your Nazi lies. My study of many cultures around the world shows that most don’t give a shit about genetics. They care about language and culture, that’s it.”
    Actually, this is one of your lies. Which seems to have developed itself from a lifetime of Hollywood rubbish. Your hilarious fictional perception of diabolical Nordic monsters hiding in North Pole Ice Laboratories (NPiL) secretly conspiring to genetically infiltrate the human genome for the sole purpose of creating a human viral pandemic in order to reduce the inferior Negro DNA to save the White blood!… is nothing more then typical Jewish paranoia and hatred. Perhaps this is something the Jews wish to accomplish for themselves. You know what they say about someone who accuses others right? Jews are notoriously more seclusive then Europeans. Infact Europeans are the most inclusive people in the world. To the point of detriment. Which makes people like you, who claim otherwise, so absurd. Simply look at the Ethnic population ratios to any given country in the world. You will quickly realize every country in the world except Europe and America consist of 97% of its original Ethnic population. But this kind of common sense doesn’t mean anything to you does it? Your hatred is so strong.. that it revels your true motive.
    “Wrong. Most people want to keep this going. You Nazis want to preserve your fucking genetic bloodline! This is where you part company with the rest of humanity and join the Orcs.”
    I dont have time for fantasy games like WoW, sorry.
    “Nope. With you NAZIS, and that’s what a Nordicist is, a NAZI, it’s all about das blut, the blood.”
    More Hollywood induced jargon and spin. When the Mongols and the Golden Horde invaded Eastern Europe trying to push all the way through, the Rus rallied back and fought. When the Brits invaded South Africa, the Zulu’s fought back in the same fashion. So on and so on. You could fill up a library with the amount of time in history Cultures and Heritage picked up arms to defend itself. The word genetics didn’t exists then. So why did these people fight back? Another example is when the Axis Powers of Europe rallied to fight the Communist in Russia and push them back to the historical Mongolian/Russian geographical lines in an effort to stop them from invading Western Europe.. This is simply another example of Culture and Heritage in survival mode when threatened by force (Jewish Communism backed by the historic Asiatic/Turkish aggressor. This threat goes back to 1200 in which many historic battles have taken place between the Russians and Asia Minor. Once again. Your perspective is hollywoodish. By the term Hollywood, i mean 1942. In Hollywood, History began in 1942. How convenient for a Jewish twat like you 🙂 (Though you dont look Jewish in the slightest. Which is twice as odd. Typical California i guess. Everything’s fake down there, from boobs to jews. What a wonderful pit.)
    “This is another one of your lies. That we are doing something new here. Nonsense. Multiracial empires have always existed.”
    Is that right. Care to name some? The only one that would come remotely close is the Roman Empire. It was not multiracial in the context America is. The Roman Empire was ruled by provinces. The ethic cultures within the Empire remained where they originated from. Cultures and Ethnic intermarriage was no more profound before or after the Roman Empire. You’re basing your perceptive and ideology on fantasies and self-made myths. The power base of the Roman Empire was Rome and Italy. At the time, the Celts and Germanic tribes where considered barbarians. The Jewish, Gypsie, Nomadic races of the Huns where considered savages. The Arabs were considered a timeless Enemy and the Negro was considered sub-human. So tell me.. what Empires of the past are you talking about? The Prussians with their asian/african slave army? Get real. America has always been known as the “New World”. I didnt invent the term “American Experiment” The world did.
    “At any rate, it’s much, much better, and fairer, for Blacks that the previous set up.”
    I’d have to disagree. There’s an abundance of studies by both Black and White leadership (mostly Black) that show a drastically sharp decline in test scores and education in historically very mixed public schools. Most of the Black leadership wished the education system to remain segregated and quiet frankly still does. Not to recently in Seattle, there was a call by prominent Black leaders along with a black teachers association to push for legal segregation of 2 public schools. They received minimal news coverage at the time. Mostly due to the fact media induced, self hating, white liberals like you didn’t want to hear about it, because certainly only the Nords (descendants of the evil Hitler monster) inside diabolical North Pole Laboratories could possible think of such a thing. 🙂
    “Well, they get along just fine in my California town. You know, there’s always going to be ethnic confict, there’s no escaping from it.”
    Ahh, i see. But i thought the Marxist Utopia fixes all that?
    “In the areas where they are fighting, INDEED the Mexicans think they are superior. They are disgusted by Black behavior and think that Blacks are sickeningly inferior. They don’t have White hangups about race. They embrace racism without hangups.”
    “They embrace racism without hangups.”
    hahahaha! Thats all. Just laughter.
    “Yes, I see, Judeo-Bolshevism. You really are a Nazi, aren’t you?”
    After learning world history and looking at multiple perspectives around the world. The threat of global British/Jewish Imperialism and the new Communist over through to the East of Germany after the 1918 Russian Revolution and the 1932 Genocide of 10million innocent German Christians in Ukraine; I understand why the Nazi’s were so popular among 60% of the worlds population which was under British authoritative rule at the time. As far as all the post war propaganda 80yrs later being religiously pumped out of Hollywood and falling Western states 24/7, I used to take it at face value when i was a kid. Not anymore. To little substance and unfactual suggestion along with hypocritical events to by into ‘faith’ based history. I prefer facts opposed to emotional half-truths and one-sided fishtank political perspectives. Like i said, in Hollywood.. history began in 1942. How convenient. But as far as me being a Nazi. No. The Nazi Party is no longer around.
    “Actually, this is another one of your evil Nazi lies. Sure, most cultures want to persist, but a lot of them go out anyway, and there’s not much they can do about it. Few ethnics around the world are ready to take up arms and fight to preserve their bloodlines. Except you NAZIS that is.”
    I dont know where you get your belief that cultures dont pick up arms to defend themselves from invaders. Seems a bit naive. If that were the case, the world would have no boarders. If someone were to do a study on the amount of National/Cultural boarders that have existed during known human history. I believe the numbers would be mindboggling. As we all know, boarders are constantly changing.
    “Truth is, this whole, “we just want to preserve out bloodline” (I mean culture!) is just one more of your vile Nazi lies. The only reason you want to preserve your precious genes is because you think that your Nordic supergenes are better than those of every other human group on Earth. That’s why you are Nordicist-Nazis. To preserve your supremacist genes. Face it.”
    I hope you enlighten your perspective outside the confinement of California and Hollywood/Tel Aviv Horror movies. If Hitler was a so called Nordicist” why did he commission three Black Muslim SS Divisions? Why would he allow Black North Africans in Egypt within his so called sacred Nordic fighting machine? Why did Hitler (the evil white racist) hold discussions with Muslim partisans like the Muslim Brotherhood? Why were the Japanese Invited into the great war against British/Jewish Imperialism? Are you suggesting Muslims and Asians secretly wanted to be Nordic Gods? Why did the Russian Cossacks fight with the 14+ Coalition Nazi Axis? Was it to gain back what the Communist invaders (Golden Horde/Jewish/Turkish Nomads) murdered from them in 1918? Why is there such a STRONG anti-jewish sentiment in Russia today? After all its 2009. Do the Russians know first hand what its like to live under a Jewish “Utopia”? Could 80yrs of Jewish Utopia be the source of the fastest growing anti-jewish sentiment in the word today?
    Thor: Why does everyone hate the Jews Joseph? Is it because they wear glasses?
    Joseph: That would seem a bit over the top. Must be something else Thor.
    Thor: Hmmmmm. What could it be? Oh! i know! Its because they are Semitic right!? Hence the term Anti-Semitic!
    Joseph: Thats it! Oh wait… but the Arabs are Semitic too!
    Thor: Yeah the term Semitic describes people of Arab decent. Thats what the definition here says anyways.
    Joseph: Hmmmm well gosh darn Thor! that doesn’t make any sense at all! Why do Arabs hate the Jews? I was told by Hollywood the Iranians are Racist.
    Thor: How can the Iranians be racist towards Jews when they are both Semitic? That doesn’t make much sense to me.
    Joseph: Hmmmmm. Gee wiz Thor! You’re absolutely correct. It doesn’t make much sense. But who the fuck cares! Steven Spielberg is a Jew and makes awesome movies! If him and his crew say some mother fuckers are racist. By Shalom! they are! Now stfu and pay me restitution for the holohoax Thor, you’re a racist too!
    Ba Dum Ba Dum.

    1. There is so much here.
      I am not Jewish, but I would love to be a Jew. I’m a Jew wannabe.
      We on the Left are anti-Zionists and some of us are even critical of Judaism. Judaism is a blood and soil religion. In the early days of the Nazis, the Nazis said that they wrote the Nuremberg Laws based on Jewish racial laws. So there are similarities. Also both groups were hyperethnocentric and ultranationalist. And Jews can be very racist too, especially back in the 1930’s Europe.
      Why is there such a STRONG anti-jewish sentiment in Russia today? After all its 2009. Do the Russians know first hand what its like to live under a Jewish “Utopia”? Could 80yrs of Jewish Utopia be the source of the fastest growing anti-jewish sentiment in the word today?
      No because the same folks who hate Jews also love Stalin.
      Hitler made alliances with those anti-Semitic North Africans and Muslims because they hated Jews just as much as he did. That’s why. He made alliances with Japan because it was convenient to do so. Anyway, the Nazis didn’t really think that Japs were all that inferior. They were perfectly willing to divide up the world with the Japs.
      The studies are the other way around. Everyone knows that Blacks do better in integrated schools. Going to school with Whites is good for Blacks. I think living with Whites is good for Blacks. They set good examples for Blacks and push them to try harder. As far as Blacks wanting segregated schools, there’s always a few nuts. We already tried segregated schools. For Blacks, it failed.
      Defending yourself from invaders is one thing. But almost all tribes allow marrying out with other tribes. It’s quite normal, in fact, it is often encouraged. But if you marry in, you are supposed to assimilate to their culture and language. The tribes that opposed this like Nazi idiots want to do often get inbred.
      There was no Holodomor. It never even happened. Check the history books. There was no man-made famine.
      Ahh, i see. But i thought the Marxist Utopia fixes all that?
      Well, increased diversity tends to cause increased instability. That’s pretty well known.
      Is that right. Care to name some?
      The whole history of the world is a history of endless invasions and immigration movements by one group into the territory of another group. The end result has been endless race-mixing and ethnicity-mixing. There is nothing new going on here.

  16. Swedes, Finns and Norwegians have significant Mongoloid ancestry. Sweden is the blondest country in Europe with the highest Asian DNA of all. Look at their features closely. They are light with blond and blue eyes but they’re features show significant Asian admixture. I don’t know why or how they could call themselves pure. It’s ludicrous!

    1. I don´t know what are you talking about. If by asian you mean the N3 haplogroup, let me inform you that it’s not asian. It’s an ancient haplogroup that has more than 8000 years. It’s Siberian. By that time Siberian populations were absolutely white. Old skeletons found in the kurgans show Europid skulls and a prevalence of light eyes in their extracted DNA. The Siberian groups of asiatic looking people are there because of a genetic bottleneck effect. I doubt you have seen many people from Scandinavia to do statements like that. And besides, the most “asian” and blond country would be Finland, not Sweden. If you are going to speak about genetics, learn a little bit first. Haplogroups only show paternal and maternal ancestral origins. In autosomal tests which actually show all the genetic composition. Swedes, Finns, Russians, Italians and almost every european shows a 100% Europid genetic composition.

  17. Dude STFU, thanks. What is that a picture of? Your face? People are going to mistake you for a pedophile with that look of yours. Your gene pool is shit. Tell your parents and your grandparents I said so. And that is why you are pathetic. Robert Lindsay the faggot piece of cum stain. What a dumb ass.

  18. ” I don’t know that many who are concerned about preserving their specific genetic line or phenotype or genetic tribe or subrace. In fact, I can’t think of one. It’s only the Nordicists. Cuz they think they are better than anyone else. That’s the only reason.”
    I’m going to have to disagree with this. Personally, I hate to see any race or phenotype blended out of existence. Whether they are Nordic, Native American, Ainu, Khoisan, white or not, the destruction of genetic diversity is a sad thing. Selection has caused humanity to diverge into so many unique and fascinating races, and not preserving this art is a crime akin to destroying ancient artifacts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *