Jews Versus Overseas Chinese

Repost from the old site. I am not convinced that being a market-dominant minority is the smart thing to do, but some groups just outcompete others. Jews outcompete White Gentiles (the real reason for most anti-Semitism) and Overseas Chinese outcompete Malays, Indonesians and Filipinos.
After a while, the people in the country get tired of a group of “outsiders” numbering perhaps 1-3% of the population taking control of 25-70% of the nation’s wealth and the inevitable pogrom/backlash takes place. Think about it. How many countries are going to put up with that, no matter how fairly it was acquired?
Still, I think there is a smart way (Overseas Chinese, Armenians, East Indians, Lebanese) and a dumb way (Jewish) to be a market-dominant minority.
Uncle Milton commented on a previous post of mine that dealt peripherally with the overseas Chinese. I will deal with his comments at the end of the article:

Robert Lindsay: There are differences between Jews and Overseas Chinese. The Overseas Chinese tend to keep their heads down, keep out of politics, and are not endlessly meddling in the cultural and political affairs of the nation – they just focus on making money. Jews focus on making money too, but they can’t seem to help trying to change society, a habit that arouses mountains of anti-Semitism.
Uncle Milton: I would say this is incorrect. Thaksin Shinawatra, the former prime minister of Thailand (and one of the richest if not the richest men in Thailand) was deposed by a military coup is ethnically Chinese.
There were also many ethnic Chinese who were very close to Suharto and received special favors and privileges from the Indonesian government.
The Chinese in Indonesia, however, have had to play a background role because the Indonesians, especially the Muslims, resented them. Basically, as recently as 1998 there were pogroms against ethnic Chinese. (One could also say the anti-communist purges of the mid 60s were heavily directed against ethnic Chinese.)
In other words ethnic Chinese in Indonesia were never tolerated previously as much as Jews have been in the US in the past five decades, so they had no basis on which to build a political or cultural movement. In recent years however, China has given aid and been an important foreign investor in Indonesia.
I suspect ethnic Chinese influence using mainland China with it’s rising economic prowess (and potentially it’s substantial army) will increase (outwardly) in Southeast Asia.
As for the Philippines, their national hero Jose Rizal was part Chinese as was the first president after Marcos’ dictatorship ended: Razored Aquino.

I really do not know much about the Overseas Chinese. I do not think that they would go on Jewish-type jihads to wage radical change in Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines no matter what. Overseas Chinese just do not care about such things. They just care about making money and keeping the pogroms away and little else.
Sure, they have gained quite a bit of political power, as one might expect due to their money. However, I believe that Indonesia and certainly Malaysia still have some very anti-Chinese laws on the books.
The Communist revolutionaries in Malaysia were mostly Chinese, but the Chinese got into this movement not due to any love of Communism so much as a way of changing a government that they saw as heavily biased against the Chinese.
In this way, they may be somewhat comparable to the many Jews who flocked to the Bolsheviks in Russia and the Communists in Poland during and after World War 2 not necessarily because they loved Communism so much, but more because the Communists were offering to crack down hard on anti-Semitism, and Polish and Russian anti-Semitism has not been a picnic for the Jews.
It’s quite common for Filipinos, especially the urban university educated middle and upper classes, to be part-Chinese. The Chinese have been coming to the Philippines in large numbers for 800 years now and they bred in pretty heavily with the locals. Filipinos with some Chinese ancestry are quite common. The real Overseas Chinese are the pure Chinese who are 3% of the country and control 70% of the wealth.

Uncle Milton responds: I would say any ethnic minority group that controls 70% of a nations wealth inherently has a large amount of societal and cultural control, albeit indirectly.
Ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia (with the exception of Thailand) are probably in a position similar to Jews in the US around 1950 with the although the ethnic Chinese control a much larger percentage of the wealth in the Southeast Asia than Jews control in the US.
The rise of political and cultural influence from Jews (US) came fairly soon after WWII and the formation of Israel and really got rolling by about the mid-60s. In my view US Jews have probably hit their peak influence or are past it. Basically it’s a numbers game, Jews are declining rapidly in number both nominally and as a percentage of the population.
The average number of children born to Jewish women is 1.1; even this number is skewed towards Orthodox Jews, who tend to have larger families and generally do not get involved in politics. The ongoing Hispanicization of the US will, in my opinion, ironically (since multiple Jewish groups promote immigration to the US) mark a decline in Jewish influence.
Latino Catholics tend not to be interested (and if anything are somewhat anti-Semitic) in Judaism unlike many evangelical Whites, many of which are Zionists and and tend to be very pro-Jewish.
I tend to believe the Overseas Chinese influence will strengthen in coming years, basically in conjunction with the rise of economic power in China. Effectively, over time, I believe we will see a Sinicization of all of East Asia with the exception of Japan.
In regards to repression of ethnic Chinese in Indonesia: those laws have been reversed. As for Malaysia, basically the laws are similar in scope to our affirmative action laws. It’s up to each individual, I suppose, to determine how oppressive affirmative action is. In addition, Malaysia has some quirky laws about Islam; the Constitution states that all Malays are Islamic and anyone marrying a Muslim has to convert to Islam.
I am convinced that any further pogroms against Overseas Chinese will be met with some sort of response by the PRC. Likely first an economic threat and if severe enough, a military threat.

I respond to Uncle Milton: I am not going to go round and round about this. My perception is that the whole Overseas Chinese (OC) thing has been to keep their heads down, focus on making money and getting along, and stay out of cultural stuff. They are the complete opposite of the Jews.
Now, why so many OC got involved in the Indonesian Communist Party in 1965, I have no idea. First of all, I am not even sure it is true. I am sure that there must also have been huge numbers of Indonesians involved. After all, that party was one of the largest political parties in the nation. It’s been outlawed since 1965 because the ruling Indonesian elites are so terrified of it coming back bigtime.
Communist parties (CP’s) are still a pretty big force in that region.
Vietnam and Laos are ruled by CP’s, Cambodia had a ruling CP until just recently (not the Khmer Rogue, but instead a pro-Vietnamese CP whose leader was named Hun Sen), the Philippines has a vast CP that is outlawed and has taken up arms in a huge insurgency, Nepalese Maoists are about to seize power, Indian Maoists are tearing up India, there is a Maoist insurgency in Bangladesh, there is an active armed CP in Burma, and China, the largest nation on Earth, is ruled by a CP.
Communism goes right along with the cultural and economic realities of the region very well, particularly with Confucianism and Buddhism.
Indonesia still has one of the most horrible and inequitable semi-feudal economies in the region. It’s not that different from the Philippines. A ruling elite who are little more than criminals has teamed up with the military to steal about every spare dime in the land. Hunger and malnutrition are widespread, and wages are ridiculously low.
The state for all intents and purposes as a guarantor of the rights of the poor, who are the overwhelming majority, simply does not exist. The ruling system under Suharto (pangasila) – an alliance between capital and labor along with very close ties between capital, the military and state, along with all sorts of para-state organizations – bears quite close resemblance to classical fascism.
The state even has bands of street thugs (usually Islamists) who conveniently assault striking workers. Leftists, dissidents and labor activists are also just out and out murdered by the state.
I am not sure about the Sinicization of the whole region, because so many nationalists in those countries are hostile to the OC. Even in Vietnam there is a lot of hostility towards the OC and to Chinese in general. Fact is, no one in Asia likes the Chinese. This is what I have been told by Asians. They are an 800-lb gorilla romping through the backyard and everyone is scared of them.
There is a Chinese nationalist who comes here every once in a while and he is furious at the way that these countries have treated their ethnic Chinese. He is urging the OC’s to just pack up, sell off their assets, and go back to China or Taiwan.
You may be correct that China may intervene in the next anti-Chinese pogroms, assuming that they occur.
The Jews are total morons for letting all of these anti-Semitic Mesoamerican Catholics in here. Jesus Christ, what were they thinking? I talk to these Hispanics now and again, and they are, as a group, way more anti-Semitic than the average US White Protestant. Jews are so stupid sometimes. You know that probably 80-90% of US Jews are 100% open borders too.
Jews play dangerous games a lot, and this is one more case of it. They don’t want to oppose immigration because that will set off White racism. They like immigration because it weakens the dominant ethnic-religious group in the nation – in this case, White Christians. Thing is, the Jews have done their work and the job is done.
White Christians are already sufficiently diluted that there is not going to be any racist backlash that is going to turn anti-Semitic and go after the Jews. Whites are like 64% of the US population and that was in 2000. You know we are probably like 57% now. That’s what this sudden burst of White nationalism is – the last cry of a dying majority. Historically, such backlashes can get nasty, but I think in this case, it’s too little, too late.
Amy Chua’s World On Fire is an excellent example of a modern-day Overseas Chinese polemic. Her OC aunt living in the Philippines was murdered by her Filipina maid, possibly in a fit of ethnic pique.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

13 thoughts on “Jews Versus Overseas Chinese”

  1. The Jews are total morons for letting all of these anti-Semitic Mesoamerican Catholics in here. Jesus Christ, what were they thinking?
    Clearly ethnic Jews played a strong role in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, however that was for legal not illegal immigration:
    “Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act, INS Act of 1965, Pub.L. 89-236) abolished the national-origin quotas that had been in place in the United States since the Immigration Act of 1924. It was proposed by Emanuel Celler, co-sponsored by Philip Hart and heavily supported by United States Senator Ted Kennedy.”
    Weakening laws and enforcement against illegal immigration (almost all Latino..) was initially heavily promoted by gentile White farmers in Texas and California. It was the 1986 amnesty that got the ball rolling for open borders:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Reform_and_Control_Act_of_1986
    “The first Simpson-Mazzoli Bill was reported out of the House of Senate Judiciary Committees. The bill failed to be received by the House, however, where civil rights advocates were concerned over the potential for abuse and discrimination against Hispanics, growers’ groups rallied for additional provisions for foreign labor, and the Chamber of Commerce persistently opposed sanctions against employers.”
    Simpson and Mazzoli sound like gentile names (unlike Hart and Cellar who authored the 1965 act..) and the Chamber of Commerce is hardly a bastion of Jewish control.

  2. There is a Chinese nationalist who comes here every once in a while and he is furious at the way that these countries have treated their ethnic Chinese. He is urging the OC’s to just pack up, sell off their assets, and go back to China or Taiwan.
    You may be correct that China may intervene in the next anti-Chinese pogroms, assuming that they occur.

    That would probably be me. Next time it won’t just be China, but Taiwan (as a predominantly Hoklo, Hakka and Cantonese) might also jump in.
    Nothing brings China and Taiwan together like hostile foreigners.
    I pity any Southeast Asian nation that tries to pull that again.
    I very much support the Uighurs and the Tibetans though.
    The Tibetans I have sympathy for, the ‘Uighurs’… not so much.
    Basically, the Uighurs are not the Uighurs. The original Uighurs were 89% Northeast Asian (vs 50% for the new ones). The “Uighur” now, were formerly called Sart-Taranchi (farmer-merchant) before Soviet revisionism produced a name change, which was co-opted by Maoist China, of course.
    These are essentially the Caucasoid lower class of formerly Mongol-ruled Dzungaria (Northern Xinjiang) and the various Oasis City states of Xinjiang. The Moghuls, or Mongols, were the East Asian ruling cast of Xinjiang. They controlled a huge swathe of that territory before the Manchus sent the Eastern Mongols to annihilate them. There was some chaos in the ensuing power vacuum.
    Anyway, the original Uighur had a much longer history in that region and they were more or less Shamanist (and then Buddhist, and then Muslim) Northeast Asians who disintegrated as a federation and ceased to exist as a people several centuries ago. They commanded a huge territory spanning into modern Central Asia.
    The “modern Uighur” (or fake Uighur, I should say) expropriated that name to give themselves undue prestige. Central Asian tribes often do that; take the name of some other more glorious tribe. People fall for it because no one can be damned to keep track of the myriad nomadic and race-mixed ethnic groups in that region.
    Another clarification on Xinjiang is that it’s a relatively modern geographical descriptor- before the Manchus cleaned house, the region was essentially divided into three regions: Kunlun, controlled by Tibetans, Dzungaria, controlled by Western Mongols (Kalmyks/Oirats) and the Oasis City states (Kuqa, Kashgar, Karaxahr, Tufan, Khotan). At most there was a transient Caucasoid population shifting through Kashgar and Tufan, but these areas were more or less Tibetan, Han, Mongol and finally Qing-Manchu dominated for almost all of history.
    Their racist, Islamic supremacist genocides against the Northeast and East Asians in that area are not uncommon.
    It was in the context of one of these rebellions (Dungan Revolt) that the “Uighur” population swelled- many newcomers came in from the West essentially at
    the behest of Tsarist Russia during the Great Game, and committed vile atrocities which led to the deaths of around 8 million Xibe, Solon, Mongol, Han, Tibetan, and Manchu civilians.
    That’s the jist of it. Likewise, Tocharian presence in China has been exaggerated in geographic extent, demographic size as well as chronological age.
    Another common lie you hear bandied about is that they occupied up to Gansu, but in fact they got about as far as Eastern Kazakhstan. Their numbers were very few- at most a couple tens of thousands. And they arrived around 1,200 BC, not 2,000.
    The first people in Xinjiang were most likely the Qiangs, or the Tibetans of the Zhangzhung culture. Then came the Tocharians, followed by Han and Gokturks before Christ. Various groups such as the Gaoche and Tiele contained the Uighur and proto-Uighurs, who came into power around 500-700 AD.
    So yeah, don’t believe everything American media says. If you want a fresh perspective on China vs. US debates, read some 2008 declassified documents on CIA games during the Cold War.
    100,000-300,000 South Korean citizens slaughtered right before the onset of war in the span of weeks should pique your interest.

  3. The rise of political and cultural influence from Jews (US) came fairly soon after WWII and the formation of Israel and really got rolling by about the mid-60s. In my view US Jews have probably hit their peak influence or are past it. Basically it’s a numbers game, Jews are declining rapidly in number both nominally and as a percentage of the population.
    heg: Ohhhh … How tiresom jewish BULLSHIT! The jews own Obama NoBody. The jews selected him back in 1992. ALL his closed “advisers” are jews. Senate and congress ALWAYS vote at least 80% as the jews tells them to, thus the jews owns Capitol Hill and White House.
    Jews own all the “papers”, all the Talmud Vision, TV and radio. Jews controls JewiWood. Only totally retarded people can deny that jews controls America.
    The average number of children born to Jewish women is 1.1; even this number is skewed towards Orthodox Jews, who tend to have larger families and generally do not get involved in politics. The ongoing Hispanicization of the US will, in my opinion, ironically (since multiple Jewish groups promote immigration to the US) mark a decline in Jewish influence.
    heg: YEAH right. The jews are just going to handle over their political power to some hispanic. The mex have ZERO poltical power. The only thing is that the jews USES the mex to promote their own agenda, they are Useful Idiots.

  4. What’s your take on the mummies of Xinjiang?
    The earliest ones were vagrants at the periphery of their true population center- Mair simply cherry picked the mummies to fit his agenda.
    They may ‘look European’ to someone who has no background in population genetics, but it’s not uncommon for Sino-Tibetan/European mixes to have blonde hair.
    So I call into question 1) his assessment of their race 2) the spread of that population
    Though it isn’t surprising to find Caucasoids that far East, as “Mongoloids” have been in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia for millennia.

  5. Regarding the communist party of malaya well most of its member are chinese and for some reason it was not popular among the malays and indian in malaya.here’ another fact did you know the current gavernor of jakarta is an ethnic chinese and he’s a no nonsense man with a good track record.btw a lot has changed in indonesia while malaysia its the reverse.please do write a topic about malaysia and indonesia.i love your blog so much and your number one fan

  6. Whites are 57 percent of the US as a whole, but whites are clustered into white areas, where probably, they make up 90 percent or more.

  7. Possibly immigration has little to do with Jews, and more to do with preventing 3rd world revolution. As long as poor people can immigrate to the US, then they have hope.

  8. Eventually the US will simply become like the third world. A huge non-white elite clustered into much of the land, with heavily protected elite areas, where people are as safe as on “Andy Griffith”.

    1. Sorry I meant to say “Eventually the US will simply become like the third world. A huge non-white lower class clustered into much of the land, with heavily protected white elite areas, where people are as safe as on “Andy Griffith”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *