If Britain Elects The BNP…

The BNP (a quasi-legal list of active BNP members may be downloaded on this site here – BNP members list) may carry up to 5-7% of the vote in the elections being held today in the UK. This is cause for alarm all up and down the British political spectrum, especially with Labor. But those voting BNP are the White working class who are sick and tired of New Labor and its move to the Right and abandonment of the working classes.
Furthermore, both parties have been promoting mass immigration of non-Whites to the UK. The resulting flood of immigrants has been a boon to employers who are hiring them as cheap labor and destroying the working power of British workers. They are one more tool to wreck the British working class. The UK is even importing “guest workers.” Oil rig workers recently led a strike against these guest workers who were imported to displace them of their jobs.
The British Left, and all three political parties, the Tories, Labor and the Liberal Democrats, have all been promoting mass immigration to the UK. Even White immigration has been a problem, as many Poles poured into the UK, sending wages for native British workers through the floor.
It is mass immigration, and its obvious insanity, that is the cause of the mass movement to the BNP and not really anything else. The situation in the UK is quite unusual. You go into neighborhoods where almost all women are wearing the hijab and many are wearing the niqaab. What’s next? Burquas? In central London you can walk for blocks and hardly hear a word of English spoken. There are schools without a single native British child in them.
There really was no reason for this invasion, but the whole political spectrum was behind it. This fetish with mass immigration is peculiar to the White West. The rest of the world does not share it at all. The elites of the White West, for about 30 years or so now, have been insisting that all White countries must open their borders to floods of mass immigration.
It’s not stated, but what this really boils down to is non-White immigration. No ever asked for the public’s opinion on any of this, and polls show that in all White countries, about 70% of the voters are opposed to this nonsense.
So it’s an elite project, supported by elites from the Right to the Left. The Right generally wants it for cheap labor and the Left for some perversity called “diversity,” which is apparently a project to reduce majority-White populations to minority status in their own homelands.
It would be interesting to see how many White majorities, if asked to vote on such a question, would vote to be replaced and displaced in their own majority homelands. Probably most or all would oppose it. No one wants to be a minority. Why would any group want to go from majority to minority? What for?
The elites in the media and government regularly warn of dire consequences should we turn down the nozzle on the mass immigration flooding our backyards. We will not be able to compete anymore! Our economy needs floods of immigrants or else it will sink! The screeching goes on.
In the media and in politics, one can scarcely hear a word questioning these assumptions. But why should they be true? Why would our economy become uncompetitive, or why would we experience horrible labor shortages if we put up a few sandbags here and there against the immigrant deluge? The whole theory seems on shaky grounds.
There are other agendas. Liberals and the Left regularly bellow that some odd thing called “diversity” will be in danger if we shore up the levees a bit against a Third World Human Tide. It is seldom asked why this diversity thing is an automatic good. Sure, it’s interesting, and racism sucks, ok.
But the unquestioned assumption that diversity is as good as money in the bank needs to be questioned. Diversity is a double-edged sword, and it’s not reactionary to say that as diversity increases, so does instability and probably ethnic conflict. That instead seems to be a law of human relations.
I’m not opposed to immigration to White countries, or non-White immigration to our countries, but this has just gone too far. It’s a case of too much, too soon.
The BNP is a horrible party. They are Nazi sympathizers, and they despise everyone who is not White. They originally wanted to throw all non-Whites out of the UK, and now they just want to encourage voluntary emigration. Their basic premise is the same as White nationalists everywhere – that non-Whites can never be full citizens of a White country. Bottom line is the BNP is a typical racist and fascist political party.
But the Left, and especially Labor, has dug this grave for itself. Labor is now furiously backpedaling and has implemented the much-needed sanity of a points system in immigration.
An ill wind blows no good.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

25 thoughts on “If Britain Elects The BNP…”

  1. As a white UK national ( with a black Caribbean partner) I can’t find much to fault with that. I was relieved yesterday to find someone to vote for apart from UKIP (UK Independence Party – against EU but pretty right-wing on everything else) or the BNP. A coalition of the not-so-far-left ( the Morning Star’s Communist Party of Britain (remnant of the real communist party destroyed by ‘Eurocommunist’ 5th columnists like Martin Jacques, Eric Hobsbawm, Stuart Hall in the early 90s, not to be confused with the MI5 operation which inherited the name Communist Party of Great Britain), the Socialist Party (Once known as ‘Militant’ – semi-sensible Trots and one-time mass Labour Party entrists till expelled by the proto-Blairites), and some disenchanted trade unionists… put together something called ‘No2EU, Yes to Democracy’ or just NO2EU (as it said on the ballot). They promise not to take up their seats or accept any allowances; they just want to give the proles a way to express their opposition to the EU without endorsing nasty lots like UKIP or BNP. I must admit that if NO2EU hadn’t been there, I would have been tempted to vote for the BNP since they also support keeping the NHS and Postal Service in public hands and re-nationalisting the railways; but they ARE nasty and infantile racists, and they don’t even have the saving grace of being anti-semites anymore ( openly anyway). It’s sad to say that the BNP are the most left-wing of the long-standing parties. So, I’m grateful to those who made the effort to put NO2EU together – someone is listening, finally. The last time I voted Labour was 1997, when Blair became pm; I only voted for them to get rid of the Tories, very reluctantly – I’ve always found Labour types as loathsome as the Tories, but slimier. I’ve voted Green since, as the best of a bad lot, but I’m not hugely impressed with them, and I’m increasingly impatient with their nebulous position on Europe; so I assume that they are Europhiles – like the other European Green parties they would join a Green club in the EU, supposedly to reform it, then do nothing but collect their generous allowances. Heard it before. The EU in its current design can no more be reformed into a democracy than a car can be reformed into a bicycle; we need to get out, encourage everyone else to get out, and get back to first principles – co-operation between sovereign nations.

    1. I was hoping that the BNP was just an anti-immigration populist party but it’s far worse than that. I was appalled by what I read. I noticed a lot of the White working class was voting BNP because as you said, they are the last big party on the Left anymore. They especially loved the public services, which Labour has done nothing but privatize and ruin. You call that a working class party? When the only people who will stand up for the workers are fascists, maybe it’s time to just throw in the towel and be done with it.
      I know little about the EU or why it would be bad for the UK. However, I think that letting Turkey into the EU would be utterly insane. Christian Europe would be flooded with millions of never-assimilating Muslims, and they already have a bad enough Muslim problem as it is.

  2. I looked at that letter you linked to re the BNP as nazis. That’s just a perfect example of the patronising establishment propaganda which makes the BNP relatively appealing:
    ” I clearly remember that after the war certain vital jobs were unpopular with native-born British and to solve the manpower recruitment problem London municipal services organised the recruitment of Afro-Caribbean people to fill many of the vacancies. ”
    ‘Unpopular with native-born…’ means they would have had to pay British workers more if they hadn’t undercut them with imported foreigners. Sorry, but that’s it. The dividing line is organised labour; without that everything else is just talk. So which side are you on? Unfortunately our entire ‘left’ is actually on the ‘right’ – why?

    1. Yes, I saw that. It’s sickening. Let me tell you. I just spent 16 years in a small rural White town in California. There were no, no, no, no jobs that Americans, or White Americans for God’s sake, would not do. None. Janitorial, trash collection, dishwashing, construction, roofing, landscaping, weed whacking, brushing, waiting tables, young White men did all of these jobs. There were never any problems finding young White men to do this work. No labor shortages.
      In the past five years, lots of illegal aliens have moved into that town and suddenly all these same jobs have transformed into “jobs (White) Americans won’t do” and we need all these illegals in town to do the work that just recently was being done by Americans.
      I’ve also noticed that there are lots of young Whites in town who are unemployed and increasingly homeless.
      The Western Left is on the Right due to Cultural Marxism, Third Worldism, Identity Politics and Political Correctness, all plagues which elide class struggle in favor of the struggles for the rights of various “oppressed” minority types. Also, White workers are often frankly viewed as the enemy by a lot of these 3rd Worldist boneheads.
      The Western Left is not led by working class people. It’s led by eggheads like Richard Seymour who are not about to get their asses replaced on the job by an immigrant.

  3. NO-ONE knows much about the EU – that’s the point! I doubt if you could find one in a hundred thousand EU citizens who could tell you three facts about the EU. Nick Davies excellent new book on the media (mostly on the British media) is vital reading on the question of the lack of coverage of the EU – Nick Davies, ‘ Flat Earth News’ http://tinyurl.com/ogekjv
    As Booker and North (see below) say, most of the literature of the EU consists of ‘pseudo-histories’, dishonest or just ignorant propaganda. Here is some vital reading to understand that it is a covert process of removing the democratic gains of the last century, by removing sovereignty from the nations. If you just read one, make it Booker and North’s.
    This isn’t available on Amazon.com at the moment so I’ve linked to the UK site. McGiffen is the editor of the EU-critical Spectrezine website. Recommend signing up for their free email newsletter. It’s an excellent short overview. Steve McGiffen ‘the European Union: a Critical Guide’
    http://tinyurl.com/qky5x8
    The ‘Statewatch’ newsletter also contains regular EU info.
    Much bigger, but actually much more readable (hard to put down) is THE book on the EU, Booker and North’s ‘ the Great Deception: a Secret History of the European Union’
    http://tinyurl.com/prockg
    Another vital book, a short, readable, insider account is ‘Blowing the Whistle: Fraud in the European Commission’ by Paul van Buitenen
    http://tinyurl.com/ry9hmg

  4. Oh, by the way, in case you didn’t know, the ‘Morning Star’, the CPB’s ‘daily paper of the left’, is free online now – a bit tame, but the still THE consensus forum of the ‘serious’ UK left. Well worth a regular look, if most of it can be skimmed over – Steve McGiffen writes regularly on the EU as does Brian Denny, and a few others.

  5. Janitorial, trash collection, dishwashing, construction, roofing, landscaping, weed whacking, brushing, waiting tables, young White men did all of these jobs.
    In the early 80s I did janitorial work (for about 2 years..) and dish washing (about 2 years again…) most of my fellow janitors were black and dishwashers were white. As landscaping and construction I would have loved to have done that kind of work but I was never hired when I applied for those jobs. (I was told no previous experience..kind of a vicious cycle) In my teens (before they called it weed whacking..) I mowed lawns.
    The notion that American born citizen won’t do this kind of work is a fraud and a lie. Well, yes maybe they won’t do it for $3 an hour.

  6. It is not a matter of Americans not wanting to do these jobs, it is a matter of at what price? The liberal elite realize how supply and demand works, and they want to drive down the wages of blue collar workers by flooding the labor pool, even more than most neocons want this.
    There is no reason why someone who complain about paying a dishwasher more than $8.00 an hour, and then take it for granted that the lawyer scum should make $275 an hour.

  7. Dear Robert
    As you said in an earlier post, if a product is outlawed, only outlaws will sell it. If ideas are outlawed (made unrespectable), only outlaws (unrespectable people) will propagate them. The politically correct establishment has outlawed ideas such as the ones that mass immigration is unnecessary and racial diversity is undesirable, so it is only the BNP that will articulate these ideas.
    In the NL, it is the publicity-seeking buffoon Geert Wilders that is saying the things that mainstream politicians should be saying. His party, the misnamed Freedom Party (Partij voor de Vrijheid), received 16% of the votes in the European election in the NL yesterday, while it received only 6% of the votes in the last Dutch election. He is on the march.
    Geert Wilders is by no means a racist. He never mentions race, but he is a bonafide Islamophobe. The slogan of the PvdV in this European election was Stop the Islamicization of the NL. There really is no such Islamicization, but the immigration of non-Europeans in the NL has been a disaster. The non-European immigrants or their chidren are overrepresented in all negative statistics. Yesterday, a Dutch newspaper published a report about the relation between ethnicity and crime in Rotterdam. The percentages of 24-year-old males who had been convicted of or investigated for a felony were as follows: Maroccans 54%, Caribbeans 40%, Turks 36% and old-stock Dutchmen 18%.
    However, religion really has nothing to do with this. Maroccan youth in the NL are not crime-prone because they are Islamic, any more than the overrepresentation of Hispanics in crime in the US is due to their Catholicism. Islam-bashing is not going to solve any immigration-related problem.
    Regards. James

    1. Yes, I am not sure what to think of this guy. He wants to deport all of the immigrants in the NL! What the heck? That strikes me as really strange and wrong. It seems really strange to me that 18% of 24 yr old Dutchmen have been convicted or investigated for a felony crime. Something is very wrong with that country. That % of criminals is way too high.
      It looks like Muslim and Caribbean immigration to the NL has been a failure though, I would agree with you on that one. When you are in a hole, you need to stop digging. Has the NL halted mass immigration?

  8. Dear Robert
    Maybe felony is the wrong translation, but the article talked about males of that age who had been “in aanraking met de politie wegens een ernstig delict” = in contact with the police because of a serious crime. Really violent crime in the NL is low. There are about 160 murders a year, which is 1/5 of the American rate.
    Deporting people is not part of the PvdV program and never was. They want a moratorium on immigration from Muslim countries. There is no policy of mass immigration in the NL and there never was. It just happened that through family reunification, import of spouses, easy rules for asylum seekers, the numer of immigrants kept rising. The maroccan community in the NL is between 300 and 350 thousand but fewer than 10,000 were originally brought in as guest workers.
    The Kingdom of the NL consits of the NL proper and 6 islands in the Caribbean. Those Caribbeans are Dutch citizens and have a right to settle in the NL. Suriname is now independent but a lot of Surinamers are Dutch citizens.
    Cheers. James

    1. My opinion: Wilders is correct to want a moratorium on Muslim immigration. Obviously, it’s been a catastrophe not only in the NL but in all of Europe. Time to bring it to an end. Family reunification immigration has always struck me as nuts. If I go live in a foreign country, I have a right to drag all my relatives, maybe my entire extended family, with me into the new country for the free ride? Why?
      It seems to me that the NL should cut those colonies loose. They don’t want to go, but so what. If the Caribbean Black youth are really committing that many crimes, then there is no point to admitting them unscreened in the NL. What benefit does the NL obtain from the colonies, and let us not BS, that is what they are? Besides getting to be an imperial and colonial power yet, even after casting aside most of its best possessions in the Indo-Pacific.
      It probably means have ever been arrested for any crime. I believe that 25% of young White men had been arrested in my generation and the generations that followed me. That would include me of course, who got arrested for drugs twice and weapons once (I had a stick in my car for self-defense).
      My mother said that this rate was very much higher than the rate for young men in her generation. I attribute it to drug laws. A whole bunch of my young White friends went down, almost all on dope charges. A lot of them were dealers. I sure was.

  9. I do not believe that the Indonesians threw out the Dutch and the Algerians did not throw out the French. However, there were anti-colonial revolutions in those places and the colonial powers were ousted after armed struggle. I am not sure what you are saying. Are you saying that the Muslims in the NL are part of a state that is colonizing the NL or something?

  10. Good luck selling it. I can think of few countries in recent years who have mass expelled legal immigrants of any ethnic group. Can you come up with any? We can’t even stop illegal immigration for Chrissake or even get legal immigration down to slightly sane numbers. How are you ever going to implement something so wild and radical and mass expulsion of legal immigrants?
    There are not very many Muslims in the NL anyway, thank God. It’s not like they are handing the country over to them. I doubt if they are 5% of the population.

  11. Dear Robert
    Go to http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org and click on the weekly bulletins. In the bulletin of 10/dec/2008, you will find my translation of Geert Wilders’s proposals regarding immigration and integration. On te whole, they are sensible, but Geert Wilders is not really a sensible man.
    As to cutting loose the Caribbean islands, they don’t remain part of te NL because of any desire for imperial glory. It is more a question of fairness and responsibility. The French also have their overseas departments.
    Dear accidentaldissent
    Yes, Muslims are more culturally alien than Catholics, but it is class that explains the misbehavior of Muslims in Europe. Highly educated Muslims don’t commit more crimes than their non-Muslim counterparts. Muslims in Europe are overrepresentated in the underclass, but such overrepresentation by minorities is not uncommon. It happens with blacks and Hispanics in the US, with Amerindians and Jamaicans in Canada, with Abos in Australia, with Maoris in NZ. None of this has anthing to do with religion.
    Regards. James

  12. Good luck selling it. I can think of few countries in recent years who have mass expelled legal immigrants of any ethnic group.
    Yes it does happen but I am not aware of happening in any Western country in recent years. (Sort of an exception might Russians returning to Russia from former Soviet states but that movement is not directed by the state…then there is the experience of the former region of Yugoslavia but that was during war time.)
    Saudi Arabia and Kuwait among other nations routinely toss out Arabs from other countries and South Asians when their economies turn down. When I was Thailand a few years ago there was a mass expulsion of Hmong people to Laos. They were forced by soldiers with guns to board buses to return to Laos. Any Thais trying to sell them water or food were subject to arrest during the transfer were subject to arrest. Vietnam expelled a large portion of their ethnic Chinese population in 1980. I know various African countries (including North African countries..) routinely have mass expulsions.
    I doubt it will happen in the West absent very severe economic conditions and instability.

  13. To James Shipper:
    Yes, Muslims are more culturally alien than Catholics, but it is class that explains the misbehavior of Muslims in Europe. Highly educated Muslims don’t commit more crimes than their non-Muslim counterparts.
    Sounds accurate and parallels my own experiences with Muslims in the US. It supports Rob’s notion of having a filter for all immigrant groups coming to the US. Some groups of Muslims I have met such as Iranians tend to be highly educated and wealthy. (Although arguably they tend to be more secular than outwardly religious…)

  14. AD: “Robert, was it “strange and wrong” for the Indonesians to expel the Dutch? The Algerians the French?”
    Or for the Ugandans to expel Asians? – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_Asians_in_Uganda_in_1972
    Or for Indonesians to partially/wholly expel the Chinese from many different regions/areas over the years?
    For the Germans to expel Jews from 1933-45?
    What do all of those ethnically-based expulsions have in common? The native ethnic majority sought to expel so called ‘market-dominant minorities’ – those ethnic minorities were immigrants which were of course ethnically different from the native group and over time they ended up controlling too much wealth and power in those countries all out of proportion to their meager numbers. This is obviously very bad for the native ethnic majority, and thus they took steps to deal with the troublesome immigrants who were greedily hoarding too much wealth to the detriment of the native majority. I see no problem with that.

  15. There really was no reason for this invasion, but the whole political spectrum was behind it. This fetish with mass immigration is peculiar to the White West. The rest of the world does not share it at all. The elites of the White West, for about 30 years or so now, have been insisting that all White countries must open their borders to floods of mass immigration.
    It’s not stated, but what this really boils down to is non-White immigration. No ever asked for the public’s opinion on any of this, and polls show that in all White countries, about 70% of the voters are opposed to this nonsense.
    So it’s an elite project, supported by elites from the Right to the Left. The Right generally wants it for cheap labor and the Left for some perversity called “diversity,” which is apparently a project to reduce majority-White populations to minority status in their own homelands.
    heg: “… which is apparently a project to reduce majority-White populations to minority status in their own homelands.”
    Why would they do that? Well, let’s look at the simple fact: Every single white western country implements exactly the same suicide politic. And every single mainstream “politician” refuses to even talk about it. This is the very same in all wester countries and it’s been going on like this for at least two decades.
    You don’t have to be a paranoid conspiracy theorist to claim this. Anyone above a villiage idiot can see that is the simple fact that none can debunk. So the Q is: Why?
    l can only come up with on “logic” reason why all goyim mainstream “politicians” in every white country would support such a sucid politic and that is: Never again!
    The whole point of mass invasion is to make the white people a minority in their own countries and by that make sure that a NAZI-party can never be voted into power by votes as Hitler did.
    Let’s look at the facts, every communist party, every green party, every “liberal” party and every socialdemocrat party in every white western world are 100 percent pro-mass invasion. The only parties that have somehow resisted the mass invasion are the supposedly “conservative” parties. They are brooken today. The “conservatie” party in Sweden, Moderatern is today more pro-mass invasion and multiculti PC shit for brain then the communist, green and liberals combined.
    lt’s more or less the same in all western countries. ln Norway the right party of the “conservative” Fremskrittspartiet got something like 25 percent in a poll and some 20+ percent in the parliment. ln France NF, Le Pen got some, l’m not sure but like 30 percent or something like that, and yet the massinvasion keeps going.
    RL: “No ever asked for the public’s opinion on any of this, and polls show that in all White countries, about 70% of the voters are opposed to this nonsense.”
    heg: That is correct, two in three do not want massinvasion and yet the politic in all western countries is the same: Yes to massinvasion.
    l can only come up with one answer and l have been thinking alot about it, and no l diden’t come up with this answer after l got jewise, l came up with that A before l got jewise. That is Je(W)ise. We are deling with commi scumbags here and they are not that bright.
    Never again!
    lt really don’t take that many to make such a conspiracy working. Top ten diehard jew-loving goyim that will do anything to please their jewish masters. Then the jews promote them diehard and they got all the “media” time they need plus 100 percent. Then you come up with anything to make the dimwits support massinvasion. No “reason” is to dumb. Next thing is that the (m)asses “politicians” wannabees soon discover wat they must say to get in the jew owned propaganda-machine.
    Never again! – Okay, let’s kill our own people by massinvasion.

  16. Ok, Silver, if Muslims’ genetic endowment is what makes them inevitably form an underclass, why is it that here in the US, Muslims are not underclass at all? Around me they are petit bourgeois, shopkeepers and whatnot. Why are Muslims forming an Underclass in the US but not in Europe, if their genes automatically turns them into Underclass in White countries?

  17. Attitudes aren’t static.
    Sure, but I am quite certain that if you did polling or any other forms of social science research, support for your sort of racism (er, racialism) has been declining steadily since the late 60’s, and in particular since the early 80’s. Sure, sites like Stormfront are growing, but that’s their base getting energized. I look around the US, and all I see is steady decline in US racism for about 40 years now. Your support is not growing; it is declining. Show me one poll that shows support for your project or your beliefs growing among US Whites.

  18. …particularly if advocates can escape being slandered.
    This is the part that ain’t gonna happen, man. Think about it. The antis even slam *me* for being racist, for Chrissake. They’ll eat you for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
    Declining support is belied by people’s actions — their choices of where to live and with whom to associate.
    Actually, this is starting to change too. I’m starting to see more and more around here, young Blacks hanging around with young Whites. Especially at the university. Young Black women hanging around with young White women and getting along fine. It’s kind of a new thing.

  19. And just so you all don’t think I’m hypocritical regarding immigrant White minorities exploiting the native majorities of certain countries, I also think it was OK for the native Black Zimbabweans and South Africans (who are of course the vast majority of the population of those countries) to persecute and/or expel White businesspeople and farmers who were greedily hoarding too much money/resources along with the best farmland in those countries which they are not native to.
    Amy Chua’s book discusses these issues in-depth in her 2002 book WORLD ON FIRE…the issue(s) of course being the extremely destabilizing influence of immigrants who are ethnically different from the naive majority controlling too much wealth/power/influence and negatively wielding it over the native ethnic majority. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_on_Fire
    Mr. Lindsay: as a Communist, you’ve got to support this redistribution of wealth from an ethnically-alien economic elite back to the native ethnic majority, right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *