Some commenters are supporting Mr. Philippine Rushton, who is indeed a scientist. I will grant him that. But he is a scientist whose ideology has led him astray into some faraway places. Commenters are saying that there is nothing racist at all about Mr. Rushton, a ferocious hereditarian who has never openly acknowledged that environment plays any role in IQ at all. In fact, every argument that shows an environmental role for IQ has been painstakingly attacked by Rushton, along with his partner in crime, the super-racist Arthur Jensen. First of all, Philippe Rushton is on the board of an organization that supports segregation, champions slavery and Jim Crow, and sees themselves as neo-Confederates. What is the point of that? Rushton is on record, along with Arthur Jensen and almost all “race realists” as wanting to get rid of all civil rights laws and anti-discrimination laws. It seems that once one goes “race realist” the first thing that follows is a desire to wipe out all civil rights and anti-discrimination laws. Often this is done under the crap umbrella of something called “libertarianism.” In fact, almost all hardcore hereditarians at some point or other go “libertarian” and come out for getting rid of civil rights and anti-discrimination laws. One just follows the other. That’s de facto racism right there, especially considering Rushton’s publishing record as a staunch hereditarian. Rushton is not a very nice person. He has spent most of the past few decades arguing that Blacks are genetically stupid and criminal and that there is nothing to be done about them. He has in particular vociferously argued against very interesting environmental trends such as the Flynn Effect, showing a 3 pt/decade rise in Black IQ since 1930, and the results showing that Blacks have closed the achievement gap with Whites by 1/3. He is silent on the plummeting Black crime rate. He is silent on the massive increase in head size in US Blacks, precisely paralleling the Flynn Effect. Niggers* are stupid and criminal and there is nothing to be done, so says Rushton and Jensen. Just keep them out of your damned country. There are almost no Blacks in Canada, so one would think it is paradise. About Granted, the guy is a scientist, but you don’t think there is some nasty agenda in back of all this stuff? Rushton’s claim to fame is R-K theory. Niggers* are sort of like snakes to Rushton. They just lay a bunch of eggs (babies) and then engage in extremely hands-off parenting. Whites are like raccoons, hanging out with the young for part of a season and chirping to them in the night (Ever heard that?). Asians are like chimps, engaging in long term, multi-year investment in their young. Rushton charmingly insists that Blacks are the most primitive race of all, with K selection for high births and low parenting investment, along with high testosterone and exaggerated sex drive. He thinks high sex drive and low IQ are primitive traits in Blacks. The more you want to fuck, the less you want to take care of the kids. Rushton draws a parallel between IQ and parental strategy. Blacks are stupid snakes. They just want to fuck constantly and when the babies get born, they forget about them or invest little in them. Lots of the babies die due to parental neglect, but no one cares since the ladies are popping out new ones all the time. Asians hardly have any kids but invest in them tremendously. Whites are in between. The fuck all the time Blacks have exaggerated sex characteristics, so they can listen to rap, smoke crack, and get down with the big Black dicks and the big Black booties. Asians have low sex drives, tiny tits and teenie weenies, because they’d rather study and get married than fuck like rabbits. The smarter you are, the more you stick your nose in a book and don’t fuck too much, which is a Godsend anyway considering the humiliation of your little Asian dick. The dumber you are, the bigger your tits, dick and sex drive, and the more you want to fuck. You’d rather screw and dance than read, and you can’t read anyway. See the pattern here? However! Let us look at the Khoisan, the most primitive of all Blacks with an extremely low IQ, far lower than Bantus. They have few children and barely reproduce enough to survive. They invest in a lot in the very few children that they have. They are actually infant-like. The Khoisan are also very gentle and peaceful, and they have very low levels of testosterone. Rushton’s theory states that the dumber you are, the higher your testosterone, and they other way around, and also the more violent and promiscuous you are. The link between high sex drive and stupidity and testosterone completely falls apart when looking at the Khoisan or for that matter the Pygmies. The Pygmies, next to the Khoisan, are probably the second stupidest people on Earth. Yet they are probably the second gentlest too. The Khoisan are probably the gentlest and most feminine race of men, yet their IQ’s are rock bottom. The Pygmies are so gentle and shy that they avoid all conflict and have almost no fights, yet they are probably dumb as rocks. Looking at these two groups, Rushton’s R/K theory looks like it is on the rocks too. Where is Rushton’s bullshit theory now? His theory is that primitive and stupid races are violent. This is not the case. The dumbest races of all are the least violent and most passive. They have the lowest birth rates, not the highest. Where is Rushton with his R/K crap? Nowhere and going further fast. *Used sardonically.
Please follow and like us: