I haven’t surveyed any White nationalists on this issue, but I’m sure that the vast majority of them would insist that Azeris are “non-Whites.” After all, the scum on Stormfront threw out 100’s of proud White Armenians on the grounds that they were “non-Whites.” It’s clear to me that the people of the Caucasus are as White as White gets. They’re probably something like the remnants of some of the original European Whites. Why do you think we are called Caucasians anyway? Actually, getting booted off Stormfront is probably an honor. But back to the subject. Have you seen those genetic charts that show Iranians lining right up next to Danes and British? I have. How to make sense of this? I’m not sure, but in studying the Lombards, I discovered that when the Lombards were in the Mid-Danube region (around Hungary and the Czech Republic) around 400 AD or so, there was a curious group of people next to them at the same time. I had to look them up, but it turned out that they were de facto “Scythians”. Scythians are an Iranian group, possibly originating in Ossetia (the land of the Alans). These Iranid peoples had a strong presence in Central and Eastern Europe for many centuries. Perhaps thus the mystery of the near-cousin relationship between the Iranians and the Danes is explained. And as the above link shows, Thor Heyerdahl agrees. So… Azeris and Scandanavians, sprung from some common source (apologies to Sir William Jones)?
Please follow and like us: