More on the Black Man-White Women So-Called Rape Epidemic

Black male criminals do not preferentially target White females for rape. If anything, they massively deselect them. And they massively overselect Black females. Black females are 4.5 times more likely to be selected by Black rapists than White females are.
However, White females are 5X greater in the population, so we would expect Black criminals to select White females at 5 X the rate of Black females, and to select Black females at 20% the rate of White victims. Instead, the figures are reversed. Black rapists select black females at 22.5 X their rate in the population and select White females at only 4.5% of their rate in the population.
Truth is, instead of hunting for Whites, as Robert Gordon of John Hopkins (Le Griffe Du Lion) dishonestly suggests, there is massive deselection of White females by Black rapists and massive overselection of Black females.
Black women bear the wrath of Black rapists at about 20-25 X the rate that White women do.
White women get off easy!
Further, as Tim Wise points out, 5-7 times more White women are raped by White men than are raped by Black men. White rapists truly select for White women and massively deselect for Black women. A White woman is about 6 X more likely to be raped by a White man than by a Black man.
The notion that Whites must separate themselves from Blacks in order to avoid the depredations of Blacks is wrong.
It is Black women who bear the brunt of the devastating rape epidemic committed by younger Black males.
If Whites were to separate themselves from Blacks as White nationalists want to do, the entire brunt of the rape wrath of young Black males would be directed against Black females; furthermore, Blacks would experience the entire nightmare of Black crime directed solely against their own.
This is a massive human rights violation for Black females and for all Black crime victims.

Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

92 thoughts on “More on the Black Man-White Women So-Called Rape Epidemic”

  1. “How is it exactly that Tim Wise is a Jew if his Mom wasn’t even Jewish? I don’t get it. What did he do, convert?”
    He was born in 1968 so I am guessing he got one of potpourri exposures to religion. But from what I read on one forum he has not been religious since his “youth”.
    He alluded to his mother’s heritage and family history in the US (going to 1740..) in his book “White like me” I guess to give himself street cred as a guy who’s family actually did benefit from slavery. (Unlike his father’s side of the family which came to the US after the Civil war.
    His Wikipedia entry:
    Parents Michael Julius Wise and LuCinda Anne (McLean) Wise
    I found this fun tidbit: Tim Wise relates how his grandmother–a lifelong liberal–began hurling racial epithets at her African-American nurses toward the end of her struggle with Alzheimer’s. Wise, director of the Association for White Anti-Racist Education (AWARE), offers this personal history to illustrate how his grandmother’s disease-ravaged mind was no longer able to fight the racist socialization Wise believes affects white culture.
    Shit… even his granny whose mind was turning to mush was not immune from his anti-racist screed.
    And from what I gather he charges a princely sum for his speaking fees, his advice to corporations to advance diversity, and his consulting fees in lawsuits to promote diversity.
    I tend to believe his successive citation of being Jewish is deflect any criticism he levels against Israel or Zionists. Also he has had a long association with the SPLC (which has quite a few Jews on it’s staff..) so maybe he decided to amp his up Jewish side as a form of bonding. From the way he acts.. I would guess that as a teenager he didn’t consider himself Jewish but that he tried on that identity later.
    The irony is that David Duke (I am not a fan of Duke..) apparently once described Wise as being a Jew who was very “Aryan looking”. In reality I think Wise is a bit of a pretender.

  2. Tim Wise is a multimillionaire. He gets paid many thousands of dollars for a speech, and if we are just talking about campuses, he visits well over 50 a year to spread his Marxist thought. Also, he makes hundreds of thousands of dollars from his Marxists diatribes in the written word, via his books.

  3. The jew run USSR was N-O-T opposed to jewish nationalism. Only a ignorant can claim that Robert.
    According to Golda Meir’s diary she was rallied by 50.000, five + four zeros jews in Mocba (Moscow in russian) 1949 outside the GIGANTIC JEWISH synagogoue down town Moscow.
    Every single russian church in Sovjet was either blown up or made into a stable – but not one jewish synagogoue was ever touched.
    In 1948 the jews drove the english out of Palestine, the day after Ben Gurion proclaimed the terrorist state the jews attacked the all the arab countries around Palestine with fighter planes, tanks and every single jew in Palestin had a gun with ammo.
    Where do you think the jews got that armour from?
    All the armour the jews got they had stolen from Sovjet. The whole airforce was smuggled from Sovjet to Palestina via Czechoslovakia and Turkey. This is ww2 fighters like the UK Spitfires, short range and hence they must land and refuel often.
    That Stalin was a jew hater is totally jewish propaganda lies. Stalin was married to three jewesses, Stalins children are jews.
    Stalin loved jews! End of all jewish bullshit propaganda lies that Stalin was a jew hater! Period
    Jews was – is – and always will be the number one slave traders in the world. Jews was slave traders in the roman empire, jews was the ONLY one that shipped negroes over the Atlantic to America. The slave trad over Atlantic was a Jews-ONLY trade. All the slave ships was owned by jews. All the captains on all the slave ships was a jew. All the crew on the jew owned slaves ships was JEWS ONLY.
    Jews controlled New York Times in 1910.
    heg (Hoff2 when I forget to log out from WordPress).
    Looking better Robert, but still cheap blog

  4. James Schipper,
    This is gov statistics not conjecture like you state!
    The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States
    By Lawrence Auster | 5/3/2007
    Like Ahab’s search for the Great White Whale, liberals’ search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley’s and Al Sharpton’s then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn’t matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men’s treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.
    To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under “Victims and Offenders” download the pdf file for 2005.)
    In Table 42, entitled “Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender,” we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.
    The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:
    In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
    What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.
    The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:
    Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney’s Sex Crimes Unit, noted, “There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen…. It’s my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it’s my job to prosecute the real thing.”
    No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.
    Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, “a white woman was raped by black man.” Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women’s apartments on Manhattan’s Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media’s reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.
    Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers a traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right.

  5. Greetings from South Africa. The argument that black rapists deselect for white women is true on the face of the available evidence, but what if there are different ratios of instances where the perpetrator is known to the victim to instances of perpetration by strangers? It is possible if not likely that the former might most often the case in black on black rapes and the latter in black on white rapes, which would indeed indicate disparate targeting of white women by black men.

  6. Hi roboard. I just think that Black male rapists are opportunists who will rape whatever women they can get away with raping.
    To the extent that they select Whites as crime victims at all, it is probably more because we are thought to have money and we won’t fight back that much. I don’t think they target us too much out of “racial hate.” That’s just absurd. Asians are also targeted by Black criminals because they think that they have money and are weak and won’t fight back too much. Similar thing.

  7. Agreed – it is an absurd idea that the rape instinct is only or even mainly activated by hatred. Still, statistically speaking, if my surmise holds, black men do indeed deselect for black rather than white stranger victims.

  8. White nationalists are always saying that Black men don’t even want to screw their own women. I find this ridiculous. Cruising around the net, and a lifetime of observation shows me that Black males find their own females quite attractive. It’s what they grow up with. Blacks think they are better looking than Whites and have higher self-esteem. This crap that even Blacks think Blacks are ugly is nonsense.
    Black people think they are very good looking and Black males are attracted to Black females just fine. Black males have most to almost all of their sexual experience with Black females. To the extent that Black males don’t like Black females, it’s probably more due to the attitude problems and anger issues of Black females. Even Black guys can’t handle that too much.

  9. No argument there. As you said before, it is probably just that white women are easier to victimize. Most such rapes (and murders for that matter) probably only occur as an afterthought to a robbery.

  10. To Ray who said:
    blacks are 2x more likely to be serial killers!?!?!? Look up your stats….90% of serial killers have been are white. There has been one black serial killer.
    No maybe you look up some stats…..
    There has certainly been more than one Black serial killer:
    Matthew Emanuel Macon (Murdered 5 White in Lansing)
    Shelly Brooks (Murdered 7 prostitutes in Detroit Cass Corridor)
    Jervon Miguel Coleman (Murdered three people.)
    Brian Ranard Davis (6 women known murdered )
    Paul Durousseau (Seven women)
    Mark Goudeau “The Baseline Killer” (Eight women and a man in 2005-2006)
    Coral Eugene Watts (11 women in Texas & 1 in Michigan)
    Anthony McKnight (Five girls and young women)
    Derrick Todd Lee (8 Women)
    Charles Lendelle Carter (4 known murders; admits to ‘hunting’ Atlantans for 15 years)
    The Zebra Killings
    Chester Turner (L.A.s most prolific killer 12 women killed.)
    Lorenzo J. Gilyard (Kansas City, MO.—13 victims)
    Eugene Victor Britt (Gary, IN.–3 known murder/rapes.)
    Ray Joseph Dandridge and his uncle, Ricky Gevon Gray (Richmond, VA.–Murdered 7 people in 7 days)
    Henry Louis Wallace (Raped and strangled 5 women to death.)
    Craig Price (Brutally murdered 3 women)
    Harrison Graham (Brually Murdered 3 women)
    John Allen Muhammad & Lee Boyd Malvo (Sniped 11 people from a car in DC, 9 died.)
    George Russell (3 women, WA state)
    Timothy W. Spencer (5 killed, Arlington, VA and Richmond, VA)
    Elton M. Jackson (12 gay men killed, Norfolk, VA area)
    Carlton Gary (3 killed in Columbus, GA)
    Mohammed Adam Omar (16 women, Yemen. Omar is Sudanese.)
    Kendall Francois (8 women, Poughkeepsie, NY and surrounding areas.)
    Terry A. Blair (8 women, Kansas City area)
    Wayne Williams (33 many of them children!, Atlanta, GA)
    Vaughn Greenwood (11 killed in LA)
    Andre Crawford (10 killed in Chicago – southside)
    Calvin Jackson (9 killed possibley more in NY)
    Gregory Klepper (killed 8, Chicago – southside)
    Alton Coleman (Killed 8 in the Midwest)
    Harrison Graham (killed 7+ in N. Philadelphia)
    Cleophus Prince (6 killed in, San Diego
    Robert Rozier (7 killed in, Miami)
    Maurice Byrd (killed 20 + in St. Louis)
    Maury Travis (17 and rising, St. Louis and possibly also Atlanta)
    Hulon Mitchell, a.k.a. Yahweh Ben Yahweh (killed 20+ in Florida)
    Lorenzo Fayne (killed 5 children in East St. Louis, IL)
    Charles Jackson (at least 4 women dead, maybe more)
    Eddie Lee Mosley (killed 25 to 30 women, south Florida)
    Henry Lee Jones (killed 4 in, south Florida; Bartlett, TN)
    Richard “Babyface” Jameswhite (15 killed in, New York; Georgia.)
    Donald E. Younge, Jr. (killed 4), East St. Louis, IL; Salt Lake City, UT.
    Daniel O Jones. (Killed four women while on parole for raping a high school teacher)
    Michael Vernon (Bronx, NY. Killed at least seven people – )
    Chester Dewayne Turner (12 women killed in, Los Angeles)
    As for Rob’s assertion that as a percentage of their population there have been more black serial killers than white serial killers. I have read in several publications:
    Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet, Oct. 31, 2002
    Many a black comedian has perversely cracked that blacks may kill each other, but they don’t shoot-up, blow-up, or hack-up crowds of people. This bit of gallows humor always gets an uproarious laugh from black audiences. For decades blacks took morbid pride and comfort in the notion that despite the long, tortured experience of slavery, segregation, racially motivated violence and poverty, mass killing supposedly was a white folks thing.
    The assumption was that all serial killers were young, whacked out white males. It is easy to believe that. In the rash of Hollywood slasher, horror, and maniacal thrill kill films, serial killers are routinely depicted as deranged white males. The obsessive media attention on serial killers such as Son of Sam, David Berkowitz, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, and the Unabomber, also reinforce the notion that serial killers are loopy white males. The horde of police, profiling experts, and psychologists that paraded endlessly across the TV screen during the serial sniper ordeal speculating about who the killer was and why he killed bought into this stereotype.
    If, as it appears, John Allen Muhammad, cold-bloodedly gunned down a dozen persons, and terrorized the Washington D.C. area, they were all embarrassingly, and wildly wrong in their assumptions. And all the old profiles and theories about who mass killers are must be scrapped. But then again those profiles should be scrapped. Muhammad is not a total aberration.
    Two studies on serial killers that specifically looked at the race of the killers found that blacks make up about 15 percent of America’s rogue’s gallery of mass murderers.
    Their ghastly killings still strike fear, dread and disgust in the communities they pillaged. During the 1980s, Wayne Williams was convicted of multiple murders in Atlanta and authorities think he may have killed even more. Coral Watts claimed that he killed 13 women in several states. In the early 1990s, Cleophus Prince Jr. stabbed six women in San Diego, and authorities in East St. Louis strongly suspect a black man is responsible for a string of still unsolved killings of prostitutes in the area.
    The victims of black serial murderers almost always are other blacks, who most often live in the poorest inner city neighborhoods where the murder rates are far higher than in middle-class suburbs. Because black on black violence is so entrenched and pervasive, it is far too often considered routine, and police are often more lax in their attitudes toward the violence than if the victims were white. This makes it much easier for black serial murders to go undetected for far longer times.
    The implicit message is that black lives are expendable. This perceived devaluation of black lives through the horrid mix of racism, ignorance, and indifference has encouraged disrespect for the law and has forced many blacks to internalize anger and displace aggression onto other blacks. And that’s important to understand, because those young blacks that commit random self-destructive acts, no matter how far beyond the pale of society’s accepted code of behavior, still are savvy enough to target victims who pose no real physical or personal threat to them. The serial sniper’s victims fit that profile. They were racially diverse, posed no danger to the sniper, and were apparently chosen at random.
    In the immediate weeks before Muhammad’s alleged terror spree there are disturbing signs that more blacks driven by rage, bitterness, and frustration, are more willing than ever to wreak random and grotesque violence on themselves and others. In September, a pack of young, one as young as 10 years old, and not so young black males, mauled a hapless man in Milwaukee. In June, another mob of young blacks grabbed national headlines when they stomped to death two men in Chicago. The mob’s victims in Milwaukee and Chicago were low-income, middle-aged men, or had alcohol and drug problems. They were easy pickings, just as the serial sniper’s victims were.
    Though it’s not yet known exactly what drove Muhammad to his alleged killing binge, it is known that he was a man consumed by personal rage and frustration over failed marriages, tangled personal relationships, sour business dealings, and a rocky military career. These personal demons, not terrorist ties of which authorities have yet to find evidence, may well have been enough to push him to commit his monstrous destructive acts.
    But equally ominous, his killing rampage showed that it is a perilously short step from the random violence that claims innocent lives, causes monumental personal suffering, and paralyzes many poor, inner city black neighborhoods, to random violence that causes personal suffering, and paralyzes whole cities, even a nation. That’s a terrible price to pay for ignoring walking time bombs such as Muhammad. And as we discovered with him, they can come in all colors.
    Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and columnist. Visit his news and opinion website: He is the author of The Crisis in Black and Black (Middle Passage Press).
    FYI, the Black population is now 12.5% of the US.. so if 15% of the serial killers are Black that means that Blacks are over represented in the populations as serial killers.

  11. I must congratulate you Mr. Lindsey. I have never read such well written, innovative racist propaganda in my life. I wish that all white supremacists were as articulate and creative as you are. This country is able to disavow racism by placing at the feet of poor, white southerner who marry their cousins in confederate flags. People like you make it plain as day that rednecks never been the sole purveyor of racist ideology. Keep writing, I love it when cockroaches come out into the light.

  12. A little late to the party, but for the record, the two serial killer studies Olfari Hutchinson refers to found that 22-23% (not 15% as he states) of known US serial killers were black. So they’re almost doubly over-represented among our serial-killing bretheren. He also tells a lie when he says that black serial killers almost always kill other blacks. It’s bullshit. A majority of their victims may be black, but nowhere near “almost all”. In fact, the current black serial-killing rapist on the loose in the Philadelphia area is, it seems, exclusively targeting white women (3 dead victims so far that we know of). Though you wouldn’t know it from any of the public conversation of the case. Go figger.

    1. “In fact, the current black serial-killing rapist on the loose in the Philadelphia area is, it seems, exclusively targeting white women (3 dead victims so far that we know of).”
      John Smith,
      I wasn’t even aware of this! When they want you to know something, they shove it down your throat several times a day, and repeat the next day…
      I guess this just isn’t important enough!…

  13. Ladies and Gentlemen,
    I think you’re a little bit confused about the instinct behind modern White-thinking. It is naive to assume that crime is the primary factor.
    Western governments continue to actively employ policy that will turn Whites into a minority in EVERY single country on this little Spaceship-Earth.
    White people and only White people are denied the right to have our own homeland, ANYWHERE on this planet. Not even Europe! Apparently, we’re not “indigenous” anywhere. We came from hell?
    White people and only White people are attacked for simply wanting to live amongst other White people. Only White people are called “racist” if we want our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren… to marry other Whites.
    When an entire ethnic group is forcibly denied the right to independent living space. When an entire ethnic group is forcibly burdened down with White Guilt ideologue. When an entire ethnic group is forced to “assimilate” with other ethnic groups in school, work and community. …By the direct actions of government!
    That is genocide!
    What our governments are doing with “multicultural schools” is essentially reducing the number of White people that meet and marry other White people.
    That IS: “Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;”
    I also consider the White Guilt ideologue to be: “Causing serious mental harm to members of the group;” (Find me a White person that went to a Western public school that doesn’t have White Guilt in their head! We have no reason to feel more guilt than any other group!)
    One point you’ve made is that Whites generally still live around and marry other Whites. That’s why it seems that the majority of Whites do not have a problem with it. Because they don’t have a problem with it… Yet!!
    They have not experienced what it is like to look around at hundreds of faces and not see a single White person. Day after Day. Week after week.
    It builds up, and you realise; this is not fair! why is this happening? Why aren’t we Whites allowed to have some place to exist on our own?
    Africa will always be African. Asia will always be Asian. But Whites are supposed to whimper away into extinction? I think not!
    Do not be intimidated by the anti-Whites! Stand up for our people!
    We have a right to advocate for the interest of our own ethnic group! To have our own land where we can live independantly in peace, where beautiful White children can continue to be born for thousands of years to come!!
    The plastic smiles are getting old.

    1. White people could have had an all white America. But, white people didn’t want to do their own work. So, white people brought scores of black people over here. Otherwise, America would have probably been 98% white and 2% Native American and any other.
      As it is, Hispanics are the #1 immigrant group coming to America and almost half of them here are listed as white by the census. Every day experience certainly supports that since many Hispanics are clearly physically white and could easily pass as white\dark-white if they so choose. They just don’t fit into reactionary standards of purity.
      Many Middle Easterners, who have immigrated here, are also white physically and I believe mostly Christian but are also rejected by super puritans. However, adding these into the white “Christian” group would still leave America from 75% to 80% white depending on the source.
      This is not to mention that many Jews & Muslims — e.g. Turks, Iranians –are also white. They are a different religion; not a different race. Many East Asians, though not Caucasian, are also white in skin color. However, a number of whites seem to accept them as white.
      That being said, I wonder how you feel about white colonists in Africa. The answer to that would tell me you’re true position on racial separation generally.

      1. I really enjoy your view of who is White and who is not. I’m a Pan-Aryanist myself. I see a lot of mestizos as more or less White. If they look mostly or heavily White, I figure they are just White to me. Jews and a lot of Arabs seem pretty White too. Turks and Iranians are surely White.

        1. “I really enjoy your view of who is White and who is not.” :::: This is just the physical reality of who is white to me. Many Hispanics, M.E.’s, & Asians have skin at least as white as the European average. Their social rejection by some of the more puritanical doesn’t change this physical reality.
          “I’m a Pan-Aryanist myself.” :::: I’ve been trying to figure out where you are. You’re statements sometimes seem at odds with racial conservatism. But, everybody has their unique mindset. I believe there is only one race, the human race.
          ” If they look mostly or heavily White, I figure they are just White to me.” :::: This is an interesting view for a “Pan-Aryanist” to have. Please elaborate. However, as time goes on, I believe that will increasingly come to be the reality anyway.

        2. Please know “Brentano” = “BREN” = the same person !
          Its’ been a while and I happened to remember this website but realized there was no answer.
          Any way, I find it odd that a “Pan-Aryanist” would view mestizos & Jews & so on as white. Maybe that is just my own biases coming out ? You seem to have taken the broad view of whiteness.
          Otherwise, I might say, to a more puritanical person, that he can protect their “pure” white “heritage” –without violence– using a combination of such things as public records, private records (duplicates in vaults) & registering with a genealogical society for common people.
          Though “purity” is highly unlikely given conditions over the last two millennium.

  14. I just want to know where do poor black men — the group most black rapists are drawn from — have ready access to white women ??? . . . And, what type white women do they have access to ? Anglo whites — especially women — tend to avoid such areas. Exceptions would be police men or men looking for a black prostitute or a social worker but beyond that what ?
    The number one group in contact with poor blacks would, in many areas, be Hispanic but there are also ambivalent whites such as Armenians, Portuguese, Jews, Arabs, etc.
    I think, in the tit-for-tat abuse in black\Hispanic gang war fare, a number of women are raped. When a light skinned Hispanic is attacked, she is listed by police as a white woman. . . . .
    Living, working, walking around in the areas, some people fall in to compromising positions. I remember a girl, who I believe was Hispanic, had changed her clothes in an alley in the L.A. area. No one raped her (to my knowledge) but she had put herself in a position that could have been dangerous. In the area, I suspect, in time, a number of other such women could have been in other ally’s, walking in parks, in deserted buildings, alone in a room, etc. When such a light skinned girl is attacked, she is listed by police as a white woman.
    What’s interesting is that, Nazis often assert that Hispanics are used to boost the white crime rate but they fail to realize that this also holds for the white victim rate.
    As for Hispanics, they’ve had plenty of pay back.

    1. A lot of White women live in big cities where there are a lot of Blacks. An elderly female relative of mine got raped by a young Black male who broke into her place. Happens all the time…

  15. May I ask where & how your elderly female relative lives ?
    My mother has light slightly yellowish skin, a straight nose and brown hair — similar to a Mariah Carey or Nahla Aubry who is one quarter black. And yet, she could not walk to and thru a white area without being spotted\targeted by both neighborhood watch and the police. I’m certain a person who is both much darker and male would certainly have a harder time trying that. So, I’m very skeptical of what white women blacks have access to ? Where are they able to set white women up for rape ?
    I think a lot of “white” woman rape is something like the situation in Cleveland, Texas involving an Hispanic girl. That particular Hispanic may not be white but her situation still points to the kind of vulnerability such a female would have to a black rapist. Something most Anglo white woman don’t have.

  16. This issue affects (mostly young or teenage white women) in some urban areas in the west – I’m referring to inner city areas in the UK as that’s where I live. I’m 99% sure that media reports get their statistics from different sources and show different numbers. Don’t know what it’s like in other countries, but on numerous occassions I’ve heard dark skinned men (when talking outside or in public places) openly referring to white women/girls as “wh*re” and “sl*t”, and also several times experienced sexual harrassment from guys like that (mostly aggressive demands for sex, swearing/threats and uwanted physical contact). I also had several occasions when black men (strangers off the street) would walk up to me and start conversations about sex in a casually disrespectful tone – it’s like some guys just expect a white woman to go to bed straight away as if it’s normal.
    After talking to people about the whole race/abuse bias thing, I’ve found out that some men only see pictures of women in porn mags etc, so they see white women as easy (anything goes) and keep to the opinion that it’s ok to sexually abuse white teenage girls because their parents don’t care and they get raped by white guys anyway so it makes no difference. That’s because nobody cares (awkward issue for authorities, the general public is not affected anyway so it’s swept under the carpet like lots of other things). It’s not a global epidemic, it’s a social attitude which targets a certain group:
    1. female
    2. white
    3. small, physically vulrenable
    3. young (teens – early 20s)
    4. have no responsible adults to learn common sense from.
    Sensitive issues such as this are often ignored by the majority, and then everybody wonders why the next generation is more violent/antisocial and problematic etc than the previous one – offenders get away unpunished by law, until the issue festers and grows until it becomes part of our society.

  17. stats between races and percentages of this and that can be twisted but what’s the raw data? for years now, (every year) in the U.S. approx. 100 white women are rapped by blacks while the number of white men rapping black women is in the single digits. of course this comes from sources willing to report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)