Do I Have Jewish Blood?

I am republishing this post with quite a bit of new information on Henry the Second, King of England, Eleanor of Aquitaine, Queen Consort of France, and the Lombard tribe and later royalty of Germany, Austria, Hungary and finally Italy.
The question has come up because some of the charming local anti-Semites are convinced that I must be part Jewish. They say that I look Jewish too. As far where I got the curly hair, I really have no idea. I think from my Mom’s side.
No, I am not Jewish at all, sadly. Though I wish I was;  in a way, I want to be a Jew. I’m just a Judeophilic Gentile. My parents are both extreme Judeophiles who grew up with Jews and went to mostly Jewish schools. A lot of my Dad’s best friends were Jews, and those were some of the family friends that I grew up with. I even went to some kid’s bar mitzvah when I was a kid, and I thought it was really cool.
Later I hung around Hollywood and LA for years with the music crowd, the artist crowd, the movie crowd and the writer crowd. All those scenes are swarming with Jews, and Hollywood in general has Jews everywhere. I worked in Beverly Hills for a while, and that place is full of Jews too. What’s weird is that even though I’m a Judeophilic Gentile, lots of folks keeping calling me an anti-Semite. So really, I’m a self-hating Judeophilic Gentile.
We have done our genealogy going back a very very long time, and there is not the slightest trace of Jewish blood. I am 5/8 British (English, Scottish, Welsh and Scots Irish), 1/4 German (Swiss German and Bavarian) and 1/8 French. Some of my relatives came over on the 2nd Mayflower boat and others came over from Bavaria in the early 1700’s and became Pennsylvania Dutch. Others were the early French in Canada. The Scottish side comes from the Isle of Uist in the far North.
Going way back, I am related to some royalty named Eleanor of Aquitaine who was related to Charlemagne. Eleanor was Queen of the Franks, and her son was Richard the Lionhearted. The Franks were originally a Germanic tribe in far western Germany,  but the Western branch, West Francia, later became the Kingdom of France.
She was a Capetian (Capetian Dynasty, Direct Capetians, otherwise known as the House of France), a large French family similar to the Carolingians, and was a Queen Consort of the King of France, in this case, Louis The Seventh, or Louis The Young. Queen Consort is not the same as Queen. The French did not allow Queens, so the high-ranking women had to be called Queen Consorts.
He later divorced Eleanor because they fought a lot, and she only gave him two lousy daughters and no sons. He had to divorce the biatch in order to keep the throne, so dump her he did.
Eleanor later married Henry II, King of England. This was a good marriage from his POV, since he gained 1/4 of France by marrying her. Henry is known in some English histories as “Good King Henry”, but this is controversial. Henry was a ferocious and hot-headed redhead, who was armed at all times with multiple weapons, moved continuously  and exercised maniacally.
Henry had a great sense of humor and did not put on airs. He mingled well with the ordinary people and never acted like he was better than they were. An early proto-socialist, he ordered that 10% of the foods delivered to the royal palace be given to the poor.
Later he conquered Ireland, initiating an 800 year period of English rule over Ireland, so to the Irish, I am sure this guy is evil incarnate. He also conquered all of the forts in southern Scotland, so the Scots probably hate him too.
This was during a 200-300 year period (around 1100-1400) in which the Scottish were engaged in continuous wars of rebellion against the English. Robert the Bruce is possibly the best known of the rebels. By around 1300-1400, the Scottish had pretty much secured their independence. The first thing they did was destroy all their southern forts so the English could not reoccupy them.
Henry II tried to get rid of trial by ordeal and trial by combat, the standard ways of trying accused criminals, which were not exactly fair trials. He initiated something similar to a Grand Jury as early as the 1100’s.
His intemperate language incited his friends to kill Thomas Becket, a priest who had been constantly thwarting Henry’s efforts to reduce the influence of the Church in the affairs of the state. This murder outraged Eleanor and most of Europe, and most people blamed Henry. This famous event was fictionalized in a play and later a movie called Becket, which I have not seen.
Late in life, his own son made an alliance with his worst rival and overthrew him. Henry was forced to pay homage to this rival, Philip Augustus. All of his kids except his illegitimate son abandoned him late in life when he was in poor health. Lying in bed, ill, at this time, attended only by his illegitimate son, he noted that his legitimate kids “were the real bastards.” He died in 1189.
Eleanor always fought with Henry, but she bore him 8 kids. She  encouraged her sons to rebel against her husband (What a bitch!) early on, and Henry appropriately sentenced her to house arrest for 15 years. Eleanor later assumed the throne after his death and pronounced herself Queen of England, and she expanded on Henry’s “grand jury” trials towards a more “ordinary citizens” type of trials.
At her court in exile in France, she reportedly held “love trials” presided over by juries composed of 12 peers, for couples in love. Eleanor was very beautiful, probably a redhead. At one time, a single heir to royalty with an extensive land claim in France, she was said to be the most eligible woman in Europe.
Henry and Eleanor were also portrayed in the Lion In Winter, a play and later a movie which I have also not seen. Peter O’Toole played Henry in both movies.
Before the Normans and Franks, we trace one of our lines all the way back to the Post Roman Empire to a royal family called the Lombards in northern Italy. This is another Germanic group that left southern Sweden about 2,500 years ago, moved to Germany, then moved down to northern Italy.
Initially, the Lombards settled in the Lower Elbe River Valley in northern German near Hamburg. They were pagans, initially having a fertility cult religion (the cult of Vanir), but later becoming worshipers of Odin (the cult of Æsir). Vanir was a typical agricultural society religion, while Æsir was a typical religion of a warrior society.
They grew their beards very long, which is where their name “Longbeards”, from Langobards, or Lombards,  is derived, according to Paul the Deacon in his Historia Langobardorum or History of the Lombards. The long beards were apparently a consequence of their Odin-worship, since the God Odin has a very long beard. They were also ferocious and fought with many of the surrounding tribes.
The first Lombard migration, from 489 to 493, was probably due to bad harvests. It took them south to the Danube, probably around Austria and western Czechoslovakia, place called Vergundaib (probably the ancient home of the Burgundes or Burgundy tribe). They stayed there for 33 years until they undertook another migration, this time taking them to Western Hungary, to a place called Pannonia. Map of Lombard migrations.
In Pannonia, the Lombards came into contact with the Sarmatians, an Iranian people (more probably related to Ossetians). From them, they added an element of religious symbolism, particularly a statue of a bird on the end of a long pole. When a warrior fell in battle and his body could not be returned for burial, his family would put this bird-pole in the ground near their home, with the bird’s head pointing towards the direction where the warrior was presumed to have fallen.
In 568, they moved again, this time over to northern Italy, where they quickly conquered most of northern Italy from the Byzantines. When they arrived in Italy, some Lombards were still pagans, while others had adopted Arian Christianity (see post on Arianism).
In the next 150 years, most Lombards had converted to Orthodoxy (Catholicism) and had taken Roman names, titles and traditions. Note that even after the Fall of the Roman Empire, it continued to exert influence both culturally and theologically through the Catholic Church.
The Lombards were completely converted to Christianity by around 650. Before then, in Italy they had practiced a nominal Christianity with many pagan elements.
The Lombards remained in northern Italy until 776, when they were conquered by Charlemagne.
In the 700’s, two Lombard kings, Aistulf and Desiderius, conquered almost all of Italy. Fullest extent of Lombard rule under Aistulf. Later the Lombards ruled a territory called the Principality of Benevento, in southern Italy. This lasted from 774-879. Benevento is now a town in southern Italy in Campania, 25 miles northwest of Naples.
In Beneveto, Lombard Catholicism reached its apex, shown by the archetype monastery of the period, the Monte Cassino. This abbey was destroyed during World War 2 where it was the site of a huge battle, the 5-month long Battle of Monte Cassino, between Nazis and Allied troops in the Allied invasion of Italy in 1944. The Allied forces thought incorrectly the the monastery had been turned into a fortress by the Nazis.
During this time Charlemagne (the Frankish Carolingians) was conquering much of Italy, but he was not able to conquer Benevento. At this time, Benevento was stuck in between two empires, Charlemagne’s to the north and the Byzantines to the east. During the 800’s, Benevento fought a series of wars against Byzantine-allied Duchys in southern Italy, eventually conquering much of Southern Italy.
In some of these wars, both sides hired Arab mercenaries called Saracens to fight for them. The Saracens soon went viral, splitting off from the men who hired them and attacking infidels all over Southern Italy. Islam eventually conquered all the way up to Capua, 16 miles north of Naples.
In 915, the Pope forged an alliance between all of the Christian forces of Southern Italy and Islam was defeated at the Garigliano River in Southern Italy. The Arabs,  and Islam,  were thrown out of Italy by the forces of the Cross.
Once again, mercenaries were to prove deadly. The Lombard states had called in Norman mercenaries to help them fight the Byzantines in Apulia. But soon the mercenaries had gone feral, just like the Arabs before them.  By 1058, the Normans had conquered the Lombard state of Capua. In 1078, the Salerno Lombard state fell. The Capuans rebelled in 1091 and formed their own state that lasted for 7 years until the Normans reconquered it in 1098.
The Normans were not very good rulers, and their states were largely independent and tended to decline under their lackadaisical rule. The Lombards regarded the Byzantines as oppressors and the Normans as Northern Barbarians. At around 1100, the saga of the Lombards seems to fade into history.
As you can see, with the Norman conquest of southern and central Italy in 1050-1100, a linkage between Normans and Lombard royals becomes possible. Hence, this may be the historical linkage of my Norman line via Eleanor and the royal Lombards of Italy.
I believe there is some linkage between the Franks and the Lombards.
The Lombards would be considered Dinarics, racially, and so would the Bavarians on the other side, so if you go back 1,500 years, my stock is Dinaric or possibly Noric (in between Dinaric and Nordic). Later on, the Norman branch is Nordic.
If you are talking about non-Whites such as Black, Indian or Asian, there is none of that in me either, although there is a 50% chance that I am related to Pocahontas, since we trace our ancestry back to the First Families of Virginia (pre-1700), and if you can do that, there’s a 50% chance you are related to Pocahontas. She had one kid, Thomas Rolfe, and that kid had like 14 kids, and they married into lots of the few White families of Virginia.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

47 thoughts on “Do I Have Jewish Blood?”

  1. Are you familiar w/ the idea that virtually all white Europeans are descended from Charlemagne and the prophet Muhammad? There was an article about it in the Atlantic some yrs. ago. I forget how the author arrived at this, but I think the basic idea is that you have a very large number of people descending from relatively few families, all of which combine and recombine in a variety of ways over the centuries. I think also a relatively large number of families disappear w/o a trace. It appears that one of the families that contributed a disproportionate amount to the contemporary European and European American gene pool was the Carolingians, and the most prolific branch of that family was the one stemming from the marriage of a Carolingian prince or king (forget who) who married a Spanish princess descended from the Moorish/Arab caliphs of Muslim Spain. As it happened, these people were direct descendants of Muhammad.
    So if you ever find yourself in the Middle East, esp. in areas w/ a lot of Shiites, be sure to let them know you’re part of the Ahl al-Beit, so they will know to treat you right!

  2. I thought you were Jewish too, or at least part Jewish. Ah well. Shows how much I know. 🙂
    I’ve always gotten along really well with Jewish guys. They’re verbal, funny and intelligent… what’s not to like? Less so with Jewish women.

  3. It’s simple. Do you have brown eyes? Do you have curly hair? If you have brown eyes and straight hair, you’re a jew (unless you’re yellow, or East Indian); brown eyes and curly hair, you’re a negro.
    I remember somebody telling me about one of his teachers at school, in Glasgow (Scotland)in the 1960s. He sorted out everyone who wasn’t Scottish for three generations back, told them they were jews, and had them all sit together in the ‘jew’ section of the class. Seems incredible, doesn’t it? Weirdos like that were not at all unusual. I wonder what was going on in the heads of my parents and grandparents’ generations that such sadism should be considered the normal way to treat children.

  4. how do people just assume your jewish? you have been very open and clear about christianity and being an old white family in america even before this. I think on your old blog maybe. either way, i think some people just want to hate you Robert. or at least label you so they can hate you more coherently lol.

  5. Anti-Semites are insane. If you support the Jews at all or at least don’t hate them, you must be a Jew. LOL! If they can’t prove you are one, they assume you are a secret Jew or a crypto-Jew. They are always going around uncovering these so-called crypto Jews everywhere. It’s possibly I could be racially Jewish and converted to Christianity. Christian converts do exist.
    The purpose of this blog is to piss people off, so it’s cool that these guys hate me. Np.

  6. Yes, the Nazis were really insane about the Jewish Question. There is an old German saying that there is a little bit of Jew in every German. The Nazis ran up against this reality real quick and they couldn’t exactly kill half of Germany. So they made all sorts of weird excuses about who was a Jew and who was not a Jew. In the rest of Europe, they only went after real Jews and did not bother with the half-Jews and whatnot.

    1. I read an article on this subject. It was a large number of people who either had traces or a fourth or whatever that served in the military in various positions and that was just the military. Probably over half of us with European blood line have a trace somewhere down the lines.

    2. I don’t believe it had anything at all to do with Jews. The Nazis adopted a mythological view of history that muddies the origins of Caucasian Celts with semi-divine pseudo-historical tribes that sound pretty much like Neanderthals. The Nazis thought they could bring back a pure line of Aryan blood as it was in Teutons and Cimbri but those clans or tribes were annihilated and the only survivors are people whom were banished to begin with, either for mixing their bloodline, being a criminal or in some social way -a misfit.
      There were entire tribes kicked out of Germany by the Teutons and Cimbri whom them integrated with southern Gauls, Eastern Slavs, Dacians, or Russ but in some of the myths these same, “master-race,” tribes are described as ransacking other kingdoms ostensibly for resources, or food supplies but they always took their pick of the litter in women so there is no way, even 2-3,000 years ago, there could have been, “pure,” Aryan blood. In the sense that what is being thought of as, “Aryan,” is some kind of admixture of Neolithic man with Paleolithic.
      Ashkenazis are a German tribe and the Germans are named after their mythical founder of the language, “Teutat,” who’s great-great-grandfather is named by the Greeks as, “Acmon,” and in turn his lineage descends from Japheth who’s father is Gomer who is a son or grandson of Noah.
      The only way to break that known line of descent is to assume the proto-Germans mixed with something else in Europe when they got there producing a new hominid which is what the Nazis propaganda sounds like.
      Ultimately is was all used as an excuse to murder people which as a tenet of fascist control policy is necessary to maintain order of the populace. A key tenet of fascism is order through forced compliance by shock. Anytime the people show any form of rebellion you deflect their grumblings with a pre-proposed fallacy and enforce the status quo by short, intense and shocking bloodletting. The idea is to work so fast that the images of the horror do not last and those who are left behind are consoled by being coddled as, “true,” or, “proper,” or, “model/ideal,” citizens. The Nazis did explain how this was used to maintain order in their own populace which in general had a hard time accepting so of their wilder concepts. It was just any excuse to keep people doing as they are told.

  7. Sadism was considered the normal way to raise a child up until recently. The whole idea of permissive parenting came via Spock and is a recent phenomenon, at least in the West. I studied this local Indian tribe though, and they were very permissive as parents. And Latinos have a reputation for being pretty permissive too.
    The latest generation of Whites (baby boomers) are outrageously permissive, mostly because we were raised by disciplinarians and most of us really hated it. So we have vowed that we will not be mean to our kids. This has not worked out well at all, if you look at the present generation of 17-23 yr old fuckups, often raised by single Moms.

  8. You don’t really look Jewish or employ what I would consider to be a characteristically Jewish style of writing or argumentation. Anyone accusing you of being a Jew doesn’t really know his Jews.

  9. Anti-Semites are insane. If you support the Jews at all or at least don’t hate them, you must be a Jew. LOL!
    That’s very often the case. But it has nothing to do with my suspicion.
    It’s normal for leftie shitbags not to yield an inch on race and IQ. But those who have had their asses handed to them often enough eventually give in, and sometimes even make out like nothing in (commie-style) leftism ever claimed or required that everyone was perfectly equal. The most ferocious, hysterical defenders are almost always jews, easily detectable by their over-the-top hysterics, even when don’t bring up “white sheets.” When you call them out on it, they deny it with something like “No, blonde haired, blue eyed German here” or “Nope, Anglo-Saxon from the British Isles.”
    But even when jews yield on race, they never, ever yield on the holocaust. Ever. They can’t even admit it’s perfectly rational to be skeptical about gassings claims, particularly when those claims strike one as absurd the moment they are subjected to some rational scrutiny. Then there’s the ridiculous survivor stories, many of them so incredibly stupid it’s a wonder the teller wasn’t socked in the mouth for insulting the listener’s intelligence. You add all that up and it’s obvious that at a minimum skepticism is perfectly reasonable. But not to a jew. A jew would rather lock you up first and ask questions later. Their motto is “I don’t agree with what you say, I haven’t got a clue how to refute it, but I’ll defend to death my right to muzzle you.”
    So let’s ask the house hysterical jew, one Mort Goldman — a perfectly balmy jew going by the apparently straight face with which he posted the above drivel — let’s ask him, Morty, is it reasonable to merely suspect that maybe, just maybe, the whole gassings thing has been a steaming pile of jew bullshit? Or should people be prosecuted for such suspicion, fired from their jobs and smeared in newspapers for it? What say you, Goldman? (No analysis about incest or banjos, please — neither of which apply even remotely, I can assure you. Just a straight answer.)
    (What happened to the original posting, Lindsay? I can’t find it.)

  10. The most ferocious, hysterical defenders are almost always jews
    Yes, and they are often quite elitist themselves. Look at the one who runs the HalfSigma blog.
    Most Jews admit being Jewish.
    Except when it is not safe to do so. The changing of their surnames is a method of crypsis.

  11. This has not worked out well at all, if you look at the present generation of 17-23 yr old fuckups, often raised by single Moms.
    Mostly blacks, you forgot to mention.

  12. “This has not worked out well at all, if you look at the present generation of 17-23 yr old fuckups, often raised by single Moms.”
    Mostly blacks, you forgot to mention.

    Nope, I am not referring to them at all. Blacks are not relevant to me, since I don’t live around many of them, and those who live around me are pretty well behaved for Blacks.
    The people I am referring to here are 17-23 yr old Whites for the most part and also Hispanics. I have a lot of contact with young Whites and Hispanics in this age group and I must say that they are truly a catastrophe. I thought my generation were a bunch of fuckups but we look like angels compared to these idiots. Immature ain’t the word. Coddled, scamming, mooching, thieving, conniving, gangbanging, antisocial, inability to live as independent adults, on and on it goes.
    My brother has had several as roommates and he is to the point now where he is putting age limits on potential roommates. At that age, all my friends and I were either working or in school or both. A lot of these idiots are doing neither. Meanwhile, they are knocking up their gf’s like idiots. Neither I nor my friends made any babies out of wedlock at that age. The few accidental pregnancies that occurred were quickly aborted, thank God.
    I can’t believe how immature and irresponsible these idiots are. A lot have poor social skills too. They often live in front of video games on the computer.
    A common denominator is being raised by a single Mom. That’s not just bad for Blacks; it’s bad for Whites and Hispanics too.

    1. A common denominator is being raised by a single Mom. That’s not just bad for Blacks; it’s bad for Whites and Hispanics too.

      It’s also the real reason African Americans have it bad, not IQ. It’s also why so many others are failing. Again, not IQ, or some other genetic nonsense.

  13. “Sadism was considered the normal way to raise a child up until recently. The whole idea of permissive parenting came via Spock and is a recent phenomenon, at least in the West.”
    You should google “Amish child abuse” if you want some good examples of how people used to raise their children. The most f*cked up story that I read was a little Amish girl who kept trying to tell people that her brothers were raping her (they were) and no one would listen, and then the mom got fed up with it and took her to an Amish dentist (yes, they exist, how do you think the Amish keep their teeth?) and told him to take out ALL THE GIRL’s teeth. Which he did! Then as the girl sat there bleeding, the mom said “Maybe now you’ll stop talking.” Needless to say, the girl eventually grew up and left the Church.
    Of course not all Amish are like that. I’m sure some don’t even spank their kids. But I’m also sure that the whole “permissive parenting revolution” pretty much passed them by.

  14. ” told him to take out ALL THE GIRL’s teeth… the mom said “Maybe now you’ll stop talking.” ”
    Stupid too. If they weren’t so science-phobic, she might have known that it’s the tongue, not the teeth, you have to remove to stop talking.
    Seriously though, that’s horrible. Unfortunately, it’s probably true, because every horrible thing you can think of to do to a child, or anyone, has been done over and over again. Don’t get me wrond – some of my best friends are humans, but I think they’ve got a lot to answer for.

  15. Blocked: First of all, let me say something ending with “..and the horse you rode in on.
    Anyway, no, I don’t think people should be jailed or fired for being assholes or morons, provided that their being assholes or morons doesn’t put the public in danger or affect job performance.
    No, it’s not reasonable to suspect the *mountain* of evidence for the planned genocide of Jews. Nor do I see why you, as an antisemite, don’t take pride in it. So think about that as you molest your sister while playing exquisite banjo music. There!

  16. No, it’s not reasonable to suspect the *mountain* of evidence for the planned genocide of Jews.
    So why jail them? What do you have to hide?
    Nor do I see why you, as an antisemite, don’t take pride in it.
    Funny. I do not see you nor that staunch anti racist Lindsay criticize anti Gentilism:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp94fC8HUy0
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hefIti-uFUo&feature=related
    So think about that as you molest your sister while playing exquisite banjo music.
    I wouldn’t talk. Your Babylonian Talmud permits intercourse with nine year olds:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_yApGEpmKk
    Take the time to watch those videos, Goldman. You will learn much.
    Or perhaps it may just be review…
    Oh, and by the way, I doubt the persons on here who you and Lindsay refer to as “antisemites” are indeed antisemites. None of them have expressed any hatred towards the Arab peoples, who are also semites by definition.

  17. Good one, Mort. I’ve never understood why the anti-Semites don’t take pride in the Holocaust. After all, it was one of the greatest achievements in the history of Antisemitism. This leads me to suspect ulterior motives.

  18. Goldman doesn’t like those kinds of Jews, and he is not one. I’ve criticized those kinds of Jews a lot, and that’s one of the reasons I’ve been getting pounded as an anti-Semite for a long time on the old blog and commenters are saying that Jews are trying to shut down my blog on Blogger.
    Mort does not agree with jailing Holocaust Deniers.
    I’m not sure about that sex with 9-yr olds stuff.
    “They can’t be anti-Semites, as they don’t hate Arabs” is old. Try another one. Everyone knows that anti-Semite means Jew-hater.

  19. Mort does not agree with jailing Holocaust Deniers.
    Irrelevant.
    “They can’t be anti-Semites, as they don’t hate Arabs” is old.
    But still true.

  20. The term antisemitism was coined by Wilhelm Marr in the 19th cent. Marr was himself an antisemite, and he liked the term because it sounded more scientific/scholarly than Jew hater or whatever… So it is pretty disingenuous when you guys try to slither out from under it. But what else is new…
    Interesting point: Antisemites in Weimar era Germany denigrated the flat roofs of such modernistic architecture as Bauhaus, etc. as “Bedouin architecture,” making a snide jibe at the real or imagined Jewish, therefore “Semitic,” therefore Arab-like origins of the architects. And a lot of the early antisemitic lit attacked Jews for being Arabs in denial, essentially.

  21. Oh yeah, and there’s this book I read yrs ago by the title of “Kike.” It was published some time in the 1960s by one of the Jewish pub. houses, and it compiled a bunch of (American, but often drawn or translated from Euro sources) antisemitic lit from the mid 19th cent. to the early 1950s. Why they wanted to circulate this stuff that would have otherwise gone quietly out of print I have no clue. But anyway, one of the most interesting things in there was a treatise that attempted to prove that the Jewish conspiracy was in fact a “Semitic” conspiracy, and that the rise of Islam was a part of it. Several other pieces in there alluded to the same thing. Apparently it was a fairly common idea among these types, until it became clear even to *them* that Arabs and Jews really did not like each other.

  22. That’s pretty interesting, Mort. Actually, I like reading interesting anti-Semitism. I’m fascinated by it. I’m also fascinated by wild anti-homosexual, anti-Left, anti-modernism, anti-liberalism screeds from the Hard Religious Right. I’m currently reading, “We Will Sodomize You!” an over the top attack on the “gay agenda” that is out to destroy America. I especially like those early German anti-Semites and racialists. Really interesting. They even devised some kind of “German socialism” which meant throwing the Jews out of the economy and having the economy run by the “real Germans”. It reads like Marx except replace “capitalists” with “Jews.”
    It figures that these Germans hated Arabs and Jews. If you read early European anti-Semitism, that shows through. “The Jew comes from the EAST! He is not like us. He is not Western. He is not part of our tradition. He is a permanent foreigner.” A lot of European anti-Semitism is based on the notion that Jews cannot shake off their Eastern (non-Western) background.

  23. Their motto is “I don’t agree with what you say, I haven’t got a clue how to refute it, but I’ll defend to death my right to muzzle you.”
    Thats the jewish insane mentalitet. I think this maybe is the problem with this jews, Quote:
    “… idiocy and imbecility are found comparatively more often among Jews than among non-Jews.”
    Source: jJewish Encyclopedia.com
    http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=83&letter=I&search=idiocy
    Oh yeah, and there’s this book I read yrs ago by the title of “Kike.” It was published some time in the 1960s by one of the Jewish pub. houses, and it compiled a bunch of (American, but often drawn or translated from Euro sources) antisemitic lit from the mid 19th cent. to the early 1950s. Why they wanted to circulate this stuff that would have otherwise gone quietly out of print I have no clue.
    That is the difference between me an you Mort, I know why the jews do that, but you dont have a clue.
    Its really simple, the jews want all non-jews to hate the jews.
    Why? Do you know what you can do with hate? Hate is a power tool and there is nothing that the jews dont know about hate, the jews have been spewing hate for 3500 years now. Judaism is all about hate. That is what judaism is – hate and that is what communism is – hate.
    heg – proud antitribalist.

  24. Dear Robert
    I didn’t read this post because I don’t care who your ancestors are. What a person’s national or religious identity is is independent of what the nationality or religion of his ancestors were. To believe otherwise is to commit the genealogical fallacay. In the US there are plenty of people who are 100% American but who don’t have a single great-grandparent who was American. Most atheists and agnostics have 8 great-grandparents who were religious.
    North America is filled with people who proudly call themselves Italian, Dutch, Swedish, Hungarian etc, but who speak only English and whose cultural horizon is confined to this continent. They aren’t any of the above.
    As to Jewish blood, there is no such thing as Jewish blood. What makes a person Jewish is his attachment to Judaism and/or his identification with the (phoney) Jewish nation. Only Nazis and Zionists can believe that there is such a thing as a Jewish race. If you don’t feel any affinity with or loyalty to the Jewish religion and/or the phoney Jewish nation, then you are not Jewish, no matter how many Jewish ancestors you have.
    We may add that the Jewish practice of considering a person Jewish if only his mother was Jewish at the time that she gave birth to him is just as absurd as the fact that in the US a white woman, for instance Obama’s mother, can give birth to a “black” baby while a black woman cannot give birth to a white baby. Let’s try to be logical.
    Regards. James

    1. In ancient Egypt the line of inheritance and lineage passed through the mother. This was the same in Sparta and other nations as the menfolk were routinely killed in battle. The, “Jews,” have just adopted what is an age-old custom found in nearly every colony around the Mediterranean.

  25. Dear Robert
    I know that matrilinearity makes some practical sense, but it is still absurd to say that a person is Jewish simply because his mother was Jewish at the time of his birth. Recently, a new Chief Rabbi was appointed in the NL. He said that his priority was to find those people in the NL who are Jewish without knowing it. He meant Jewish babies or young children who became orphans in WWII and who were adopted by Christians and then raised as Christians. How can you be Jewish without knowing it? Well, if you think that Jewishness is a matter of blood ties, then it is possible. The absurdity lies in using blood ties to determine a person’s religion or nationality.
    I’m not talking about citizenship here. Citizenship and nationality are two different things. If a Korean mother arrives in the US to give birth and immediately afterward flies back to Korea and if her child has a thorough Korean upbringing, then his nationality is Korean even though he may have American citizenship. The citizenship laws of many countries are absurd precisely because they grant citizenship to people who belong to a foreign nation.
    For instance, many Brazilians and Italians are now acquiring Italian citizenship because they have al least one grandparent who was Italian. They don’t speak a word of Italian, have never set foot in Italy and don’t give a damn about Italy. They acquire Italian citizenship solely because of its advantages. Even if they have no intention of settling in Italy or another EU country, they may consider it more advantageous to travel with the passport of an EU country. It baffles me why countries are so generous with their citizenship.
    If the US had a sensible citizenship law, it would look like the following:
    1 – Children born in the US will acquire American citizenship only if the mother is an American citizen or legal immigrant.
    2 – Children born abroad can acquire American citizenship if the mother is an American citizen.
    3 – Minors who have dual citizenship because they were born on foreign soil or because their mother was a citizen of a foreign country when they were born in the US have to choose between their American and their foreign citizenship before they reach the age of 28. They can opt for American citizenship only if they have lived at least 5 years in the US after the age of 18.
    4 – Americans who become a citizen of a foreign country automatically lose their American citizenship.
    5 – Immigrants who want to acquire American citizenship have to renouce their other citizenship unless this is legally impossible or very difficult.
    6 – American citizens who also have the citizenship of another country cannot count on American consular assistance when they are in the country of their other citizenship.
    7 – American citizens who live abroad will be considered American citizens for tax purposes.
    The objective should be to avoid dual citizenship and to avoid citizenship of convenience.
    Regards. James

  26. We may add that the Jewish practice of considering a person Jewish if only his mother was Jewish at the time that she gave birth to him is just as absurd as the fact that in the US a white woman, for instance Obama’s mother, can give birth to a “black” baby while a black woman cannot give birth to a white baby. Let’s try to be logical.
    By all means, Schipper, let’s try. I find logic quite straightforward. I suspect your mileage may vary.
    Crossing niggers with whites means nigger genes dominate. Obama, for instance, is obviously a nigger, and anyone with an ounce of sense would describe him as one. Only with octoroons do we begin to see something indicative of whiteness, but even then the result is typically a low-grade, course white. (Exceptions, of course, exist: Shane Battier seems to be one.) That’s one reason the “infamous” one-drop rule (it’s always the infamous one-drop rule) makes such good sense: contrary to popular assertion nigger genes are enormously destructive of beauty (to say nothing of intelligence and forbearance), tending to possess only the ability to subtract from it, only most seldom the ability to supplement it.
    Don’t like this sort of talk? I’ll be happy to cease it the minute you cut your horseshit and start telling the truth about race, its implications for society, for the future, and the desirability of those implications.
    For instance, many Brazilians and Italians are now acquiring Italian citizenship because they have al least one grandparent who was Italian. They don’t speak a word of Italian, have never set foot in Italy and don’t give a damn about Italy.
    Yet if they look Italian, after one generation it won’t matter. They’re obviously an infinitely safer bet than the hundreds of thousands of useless muslims and niggers now flooding that country.

  27. Anyway, no, I don’t think people should be jailed or fired for being assholes or morons, provided that their being assholes or morons doesn’t put the public in danger or affect job performance.
    That’s not what I asked you, Morty. In fact, you didn’t answer anything I asked you.
    No, it’s not reasonable to suspect the *mountain* of evidence for the planned genocide of Jews.
    I specifically asked about the gassings, Morty. Obviously there are many, many alternative ways to achieve genocide, many of them them far more efficient than elaborate gassing plans (like encouraging whites to pair off with niggers until there are no more whites and only hybrid nigger mongrels using the media you dominate, for example). There is nothing like “mountains” of evidence for gassings, Morty. Even “official” Holocaust historians (ie jews) themselves admit this. Which is probably why they require draconian anti-speech provisions to protect their version of history.
    Nor do I see why you, as an antisemite, don’t take pride in it.
    Because I’m nothing like the genocidal monster your febrile jewish imagination is conjuring. Strictly speaking — and this will surprise you — I don’t even hate jews. That means you, Morty — I don’t hate you buddy. I am just sick to death of non-stop jew bullshit. Why do you lie so much? Why can’t anyone get a straight answer out of you when it comes to race? “Traumatized” yeah okay, sure, but for how many more generations? Why the hell are you so resolutely anti-white?
    In any case, I haven’t the slightest desire to genocide even people I do, quite unreservedly, have a distinct dislike of, like niggers. Hell, genocide them! I don’t even want to hurt them! But living around them and breeding with them is an impossibility. (Truth be told, I don’t even enjoy calling them niggers. I don’t to do it hurt them; I do it to hurt — or at least rile up — lying liars like you.)
    Lindsay said:
    Good one, Mort. I’ve never understood why the anti-Semites don’t take pride in the Holocaust.
    No, not good one at all, Lindsay. I don’t know how to answer that any further without “attacking” you and risking a banning, but let’s just wonder why you’d think that hating someone leads to a desire to kill him? There must be some group you hate out there, Lindsay: you really want to kill them? Er, holy shit. I think to ask that question is to answer it. Yes, you really would love to kill people like me. And in that deranged mind of yours you’ll even convince yourself that it’s me who is the monster. Eek.

  28. Well, I do believe in killing fascists, but I wonder if you are one.
    There’s quite a bit of evidence for the gas chambers, although the Nazis really tried hard to cover that one up. There are plenty of top Holocaust historians who are not Jews. The gassings were started because it was a lot more efficient than the shootings they had been using.
    Mort isn’t anti-White, and he is pretty honest. The reason Jews don’t get on a pro-White bandwagon is that way too many pro-Whites are horrible anti-Semites like you, silver.
    We have a lot of Yemenis around us, and they are awful damn smart, extremely honest and forward-looking, and even good-looking, though I only see the guys. For the most part, they look like Caucasians. They really don’t look like Black people at all. They are 19% Black. Most Arabs are around 7-15% Black, and Arabs don’t really look like Black people.

  29. Well, I do believe in killing fascists, but I wonder if you are one.
    I’m not a fascist. I don’t believe in killing them, either. It’s not difficult to show them the error of their ways — much easier than showing a commie the error of his.
    There’s quite a bit of evidence for the gas chambers, although the Nazis really tried hard to cover that one up.
    “Quite a bit” is not exactly “mountains,” so thanks for that admission, meek and deceitful though it is. Mainstream Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac, hired by a well-known “Nazi-hunter” duo to write a book specifically addressing the gas chambers, admitted before his death that his thesis was in tatters.
    Mort isn’t anti-White, and he is pretty honest.
    Obviously not honest enough.
    The reason Jews don’t get on a pro-White bandwagon is that way too many pro-Whites are horrible anti-Semites like you, silver.
    I’m aware of that. But I’m not horrible; I’m fair. And I don’t regard myself an antisemite, which by your standards would appear to be making any comment critical of jews, which is a ridiculous standard to hold someone to.
    We have a lot of Yemenis around us, and they are awful damn smart, extremely honest and forward-looking,
    Yeah, sure, sure. You discerned all that in the two minutes you’ve spent interacting with them.
    In my vastly greater experience with islamic arabs, I have found them to be hostile, backward, deceitful and boastful.
    For the most part, they look like Caucasians.
    Yemenis? Yeah, right.

  30. Mainstream Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac, hired by a well-known “Nazi-hunter” duo to write a book specifically addressing the gas chambers, admitted before his death that his thesis was in tatters.
    More lies. His thesis was that the mortuaries or morgues were converted into gas chambers, more specifically, that there was originally no criminal intent in this design, that the conversion to criminal gassing only occurred afterward. This is still considered to be quite controversial in the historian community. It is this to which you refer, not the gas chambers themselves. Deniers, some of the most vicious and evil anti-Semites on Earth, love to focus on Auschwitz because the SS tried to destroy the gas chambers before they fled the camp in order to cover up their evil. So what we have are some ruins. Nevertheless, there is still enough left of those chambers to prove that that is what they were. Anyway, we don’t need that. Treblinka and Belzec were demolished completely, razed and planted with trees, but we know there were gas chambers there due to the testimony of the criminals and witnesses.

  31. We know jews are inveterate bullshit artists, we know they’ve made numerous howlers while claiming persecution, we know that history records their prominent role in communism and their consequent parallel pestilential, pernicious and perplexing presence in Germany and across Europe, so there is every reason to be suspicious of their accounts. There is equally excellent reason to be suspicious of the testimonies of the accused, given the well known (among historians) brutality they suffered at the hands of their jailers. In my mind, all this establishes the eminent reasonableness of doubting the received narrative — doubting it, not flatly denying it.
    Of course, commies, some of the most vicious and evil anti-whitites on Earth, love to obfuscate and claim that HR is just unthinking, obstinate “denial,” typical commie(cal) speculations about the “twisted” motives of such normal intellectual attitudes usually accompanying said obfuscation, both the obfuscations and accompanying speculations typically resulting from the commie’s rank inability to come to grips with a reality in which some people are inherently better than others, a reality which nothing can be done to alter, whose only possibility of alleviation requires first that such inherent inequality be acknowledged, none of which the neurotic, perhaps psychotic, commie is willing to do, perhaps because it would force the commie to admit to the insane envy and burning resentment which drives him.

  32. Um silver, about those tortured confessions. Many of the confessed were never even arrested or charged. How was it that they got automagically tortured too?
    BTW, not one person who confessed to witnessing or taking part in the Holocaust has ever recanted. Now why is that?

  33. Fock ze Joos. Zey daystroi ze bootiphul lahnd of Gehrmuny. We most ehncoorahge ze mahsterr rrace Aryan woomans to prrrodooce lats ov vertile ofvsprrings too cuntinoo ze leeneahge. Heil Hitler. Death to ze Joos. Death to zeir God.

  34. According to this show I watched, Hitler had no Jewish blood, but was inbred. In fact, his parents had to get special Vatican permission to marry.

  35. My great great grandfather was a German Jew. I didn’t know this or care until recently. All of my enduring friendships from my youth are atheist Jews. Turns out most of them have always known I was Jewish. I still don’t have good Jewdar but I definitely get along best with Jews both male and female. I’m sure I have Jewish physical traits, but most people have always assumed I was some kind of White supremacist because I am an underachiever (slept through school, literally), stand 6’3″ , weigh 230 lbs. when lean, and used to be really into heavy metal. My father seemed unaware of his Jewish background and a few of his close friends were hardcore racists. I still don’t really care.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *