Anti-Semitic Chicken Nazis Threaten Jews

Prior to the latest Gaza War, one of the worst threats facing the Jewish state today was a tribe of Islamo-Nazi super-chickens being raised in Gaza by a suicidal chicken death cult to be suicide chickens and kill every single Jew in Israel. According to the Chicken’s Founding Charter, “not one Jew will be left in Israel.”
The chickens had recently taken over Gaza in a chicken coup (hehe), killing many moderate chickens in the process and instituting a chicken dictatorship over other animals. Lately, the chickens had been launching chicken poop rockets at Israel on a daily basis.
Although there were no casualties, the chicken poop launched at Sderot caused many cases of shock in the Israelis living near the Chicken Terrorist Haven of Gaza. Further, it is said that two Jews, one 85 and the other 87, forgot to take their heart meds and nearly had fatal heart attacks when the chicken shit was really flying over southwest Israel.
The chickens refuse to accept any past agreements with Israel and refuse to recognize the Jewish state, since it grants no rights to chickens. Further, the chickens say that Jews stole the land where they used to strut and fluff their feathers.
The chickens have also refused to renounce violence, and the roosters have been fighting a lot lately. There aren’t any Jewish chickens around to kill, so they turn on each other in a fratricidal chicken war in Gaza.
Israel has blockaded the chickens, putting them on a starvation diet and making for some awfully slim boneless fryers.
One of the great things about Israel is the US gets to use it as a testing ground for new weapons. Chickens, unlike humans, have proven impervious to most of the techniques yet developed by “USreal” to kill them. However, in the latest Gaza War, Israel used new weapons called “chicken hawks” to decimate the chickens. From the article:

Samir Sawafiri pointed at several dozen hungry chickens scavenging for food between the crushed bodies of nearly 65,000 other birds strewn across a destroyed farm in Zeitoun in Gaza City.
“They are all that is left and I have nowhere to put them,” he said. The poultry farms around Zeitoun used to be the Gaza Strip’s main provider of eggs, according to Oxfam. Little but twisted metal and crumbling concrete now remains of the poor suburb on the eastern outskirts of Gaza, one of the areas hit hardest during the war.
“I evacuated on January 9,” Mr Sawafiri said. “Three days later, on January 12, tanks came with bulldozers and leveled the fields. They wanted to spoil the economy – that is the only answer. There is no justification for what they did.”

In the war, at least 65,000 Palestinian terrorist jihadi chickens were killed by the IDF in just this one raid. All of the chicken counterattacks killed only 13 Israeli birds. Operation Plucked Chicken was declared a success by Ehud Olmert, though there were worries that the chickens would rebuild their coops and try to re-arm to fight another day.
The questions that remains is why the chickens turned into anti-Semites. It seems that not only have the Jews been hated forever by all other humans, but they have also been hated by most other animals, not just humans. It was a matter of time before Euro-weenies, the Far Left and radical Islam roused the chickens to join in the world’s oldest sport, hatred of and war against the Jews.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon20
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

23 thoughts on “Anti-Semitic Chicken Nazis Threaten Jews”

  1. Wow, for a second there I thought you were referring to your anonymous antisemitic commenters, lol. Anyway, they can be quite aggressive. Ever heard of cockfights? But if they were really smart, they’d get geese. Now *they* just don’t care!

  2. True confessions time: The chickens actually had a valid complaint. We Jews slaughtered them and boiled them for their *fat!*

  3. We Jews slaughtered them and boiled them for their *fat!*
    And turned their fat into soap and candles, too!
    Sounds pretty ridiculous, doesn’t it…?

  4. The soap and candles thing was probably mythologizing of an event that didn’t need mythologizing. One thing that’s beyond dispute is that 4-6 million Jews were killed. You guys should just grow some cojones–or have them grafted on, if required–and own it. If Jews are as bad as you say, and you did nothing, you just look *weak.* Like losers.

  5. Actually, I do believe in the soap story, and there is excellent evidence for it. I realize that some Deans of Holocaustism say it’s not true, but fine. They tried to do it in some experimental projects at a death camp in Poland at the very end of the war. There’s even photographs of it. It was a small project and it did not work very well. Turns out dead humans don’t make very good soap. Lots of people saw the evidence, too, but they were mostly Poles and Russians, as Russians liberated the camp.
    As this is one of their favorite Holocaust Denial things – there was no soap made out of humans, so there was no Holocaust, I really need to do a post on this if I can find the links. I don’t know if the soap thing is as hard and fast proven as the Shoah itself, but personally, I believe it.

  6. Also, I continue to hold that if Gentiles are so lame as to let a bunch of supposedly evil Jews colonize their societies and take them over for the benefit of the Jews, while brainwashing Gentiles into going along with it even though it’s terrible for them, then said Gentile morons deserve to be screwed by said evil Jews, if only for being so stupid as to let a bunch of bastards fuck you over while you are so lame you not only let them do it, but support it and cheer them on.
    Idiots get what they deserve.

  7. The above doesn’t sound like you, Mort.
    Anyway, I don’t want to make a meal of it, but no historical matter should be beyond dispute. ‘ 4- 6 million ‘ jews were killed’? – The Germans documented 1 million, roughly, rounded up and sent to camps from Europe, and there were supposedly 3 million jews missing from Poland after the war. We would expect at least the same percentage of losses, due to general war conditions, as in the rest of the European population; and, in Poland, 6 million supposedly died from the general population. But we would also expect greater attrition due to the undoubted cruel and neglectful treatment of the jews. So a very large percentage of these 4 million must have died from war, starvation and disease – ok, that’s still ‘killed’, but it doesn’t have quite the connotations. Also, there is the question of how many jews, liberated from the camps or otherwise, ended up in Russia – jews were under no obligation to state jewish identity in Russian surveys, and it may have seemed prudent to play down a new influx, since there was already some resentment at the influence of jews within the Soviet communist party ( See Yuri Slezkine’s ‘the Jewish Century’), So where could the other 1 or 2 million have come from, anyway?
    Do you have any references for discussions/proof of this? I have never yet got a reference from anyone convinced of the truth of the approved Holocaust story, apart from, of course, Raul Hilberg, and I get little indication that many have even seen it, much less read it – unsurprising because it’s massive and very expensive. There is too much still taken on trust re this. I believe Raul Hilberg was a serious scholar and a decent man, but I’ve read one extensive review of ‘ the Destruction of the European Jews’ which gave a breakdown of how much of it deals with what – very little on the actual mechanics of the Holocaust. This is fresh in my mind at the moment, because just yesterday I happened to watch a video of Norman Finkelstein (author of ‘the Holocaust Industry’ ) being interviewed by some of the people who organised the Holocaust conference in Iran ( who I don’t accept are nazis, by the way), about why he refused an invitation to speak at the conference. I accept his answer – that he didn’t consider it sufficiently ‘serious’ or scholarly (especially bearing in mind his precarious personal situation), but with reservations. He said that none of the people invited were ‘scholars’, and asked why ‘scholars’ were not invited – the only one he mentioned by name was Raul Hilberg. In his book ‘the Holocaust Industry’ he describes the literature on the Holocaust as worthless, by and large – emotionally manipulative tearjerker zionist propaganda (my summary) – with the exception of Hilberg. So what ‘scholars’ did he have in mind?
    They missed a chance to pin him down on this. But that in itself is an indication of lack of seriousness. And what questions would they ask of scholars? Had they agreed in advance a body of work – specific authors and evidence – that they contested, and identified and listed what contra evidence they possess, and agreed and listed where and how access to evidence – e.g. documents – is being obstructed? I haven’t heard so? Did the conference even aim to, much less arrive at, such a consensus? I don’t know, but I doubt it. It might be argued, as they did, that the conference, even just as a talking shop, is a step forward – or not. Finkelstein himself not only effectively claims that there are (were) no ‘scholars’ but Raul Hilberg; Finkelstein personally exemplifies the problem of getting ‘scholars’ ( I don’t know if he means accredited academics) involved in ‘revisionism’ – his fate, and Ward Churchill’s, show the limits of academic freedom. And there are huge swathes of Holocaust documents which can only be accessed by ‘approve’ academics – what chance of being approved if you have ever shown a hint of dissent? Not to mention Germar Rudolf (a chemist who studied the deposits on the walls of the so-called gaschambers), and even the lawyer who defended him, languishing in German jails; and the attempt to extradite an Australian revisionist, visiting the UK. to Germany.
    What’s the point of this? Well, take Finkelstein again – he stated that his critique was of the propaganda use of the Holocaust, but there was no doubt whatever that 5-7 million jews were ‘systematically killed’ by the nazis. But what ‘scholar’ claims this? Not Hilberg – the only authority he respects. Hilberg’s final estimate, I think, was about 4 and 1/2 million dead, 2 million systematically killed. Which shows how even the bravest, like Finkelstein, can succumb to unrelenting psychological pressure.
    Turns out out I DID make a meal of this, but my point is that, no matter that the revisionists need to get a lot more ‘serious’ ( though they have no chance of gaining academic respectability), in the atmosphere of coercion, intimidation and censorship that prevails, everyone should doubt figures about how many were ‘systematically’ killed by the nazis. No-one, however should doubt that they were a vile, racist, eugenics-based regime. But were they exceptional? Were the USA and the British empire not effectively based on a sort of racial eugenics? Were the nazis the first to round up potentially hostile elements, who might form a 5th column, in the face of war? This unrelenting propaganda depicting the nazis as a unique embodiment of evil serves as a nice distraction from the appalling past and present conduct of our own rulers, not to mention Israel.

  8. I’ll answer for Mort now, and then he can join in if he wants.
    ‘ 4- 6 million ‘ jews were killed’?
    Indeed. Or *over* 6 million.
    the Germans documented 1 million, roughly, rounded up and sent to camps from Europe,
    I am really dubious of this, but I would have to check my anti-revisionist sources on it. Frankly, I am tired of chasing down all this revisionist stuff. They keep throwing out new stuff, and you keep having to chase it down, and it always turns out to be wrong. It’s as bad as debating hard Zionists.
    and there were supposedly 3 million jews missing from Poland after the war.
    Indeed. Of the 3 million, 90% went missing. They are dead. Actually, it is more than that gone missing. The 6 million figure is based on population studies done by multinational commissions after the war, peer reviewed across the board by unbiased historians and population geographers. There is debate about the findings, but the reasonable figures go from 4.2 to over 6 million.
    o a very large percentage of these 4 million must have died from war, starvation and disease – ok, that’s still ‘killed’, but it doesn’t have quite the connotations.
    For the most part, they were just killed in camps, gassed, shot, hanged, starved, or dead of disease. Not that many Jews got killed “in the war.”
    jews were under no obligation to state jewish identity in Russian surveys
    It said so on your nationality card. And Soviet scholars were very active in the postwar commissions to determine the numbers. There were at least 1 million or so Jews exterminated in Russia proper.
    o where could the other 1 or 2 million have come from, anyway?
    6 million comes from population studies of European Jewry before and after the war. 75% of the European Jews were killed, mostly exterminated. There were 8 million before the war, 2 million after the war, or thereabouts. So you get 6 million. Actually, the figure that I buy is 5.7 million.
    I have never yet got a reference from anyone convinced of the truth of the approved Holocaust story, apart from, of course, Raul Hilberg,
    Actually, he is only one of them, and he is on the low side. All respectable Holocaust historians that give a number weigh in somewhere between 4.2 and over 6 million. 100%.
    very little on the actual mechanics of the Holocaust.
    There is a problem here. The motherfuckers were not stupid, and they tried very hard to cover their tracks. However, there is still a ton of documentary evidence available for what they did. Like good Germans, they still wrote lots of stuff down. Check out Nizkor. They have all those docs.
    In his book ‘the Holocaust Industry’ he describes the literature on the Holocaust as worthless, by and large – emotionally manipulative tearjerker zionist propaganda (my summary) – with the exception of Hilberg. So what ’scholars’ did he have in mind?
    Last time I checked, Finkelstein thinks that 4-6 million Jews were exterminated in Europe.
    It might be argued, as they did, that the conference, even just as a talking shop, is a step forward – or not.
    The truth is that the whole enterprise is insane. These are people who are saying that the Holocaust did not happen. They are not reputable historians, and almost all of them are Nazis, Arabs, or Muslims. The question has been up for grabs since it was asked. It still is. The Revisionists are rejected because they have nothing. It’s as if they were arguing that WW2 never happened. How long would you listen to someone saying that?
    Hilberg’s final estimate, I think, was about 4 and 1/2 million dead, 2 million systematically killed.
    His estimate is 5.1 million dead, and I doubt very much that he thinks less than 50% of the European Jews were exterminated. Further, it is completely false of you to say that Hilberg is the only one to believe in 5-7 million. That’s what most everyone thinks.
    Which shows how even the bravest, like Finkelstein, can succumb to unrelenting psychological pressure.
    A complete misrepresentation. Finkelstein is simply sane, that’s why he says that.
    Were the nazis the first to round up potentially hostile elements, who might form a 5th column, in the face of war?
    More than that. They invaded all of Europe with a plan in part to kill any of the Jews they found there. They were trying to exterminate the Jews of Europe and solve The Jewish Question once and for all.
    Were the USA and the British empire not effectively based on a sort of racial eugenics?
    Did we systematically murder 6 out of 8 million of some race in industrial like conditions?
    This unrelenting propaganda depicting the nazis as a unique embodiment of evil
    I think there are problems with this propaganda. This is one of the big Jewish projects out there. “The Holocaust was uniquely horrible and evil.” Bull.

  9. The Holocaust revisionists won this debate a long time ago. It’s completely nuts to look at the evidence and conclude that the Nazis killed Jews in gas chambers. This is why Jews need to lock revisionists in prison instead of engaging in rational argument. The only thing Nazis killed with Zyklon B was body lice, in specially designed “fumigation cubicles” which still exist today.
    There were many Jewish deaths in the camps, probably somewhere in the hundreds of thousands, but these were mostly due to starvation and disease (especially typhus – spread by lice, which the Nazis tried to control with Zyklon B) at the end of the war, when much of the German civilian population was also starving.

  10. My aunt has chickens. The males are always fighting each other. One of them got his eye poked out by another rooster and now he’s the meanest one of them all. He’s just ugly mean. I think he’s mean because he got his eye poked out, the same way some cripples are really mean.
    What do Jews do with chicken fat? All I ever heard of was Jewish mothers making chicken soup.

  11. They were trying to exterminate the Jews of Europe and solve The Jewish Question once and for all.
    No, Nazis coloborated with the Nazis.

  12. They were trying to exterminate the Jews of Europe and solve The Jewish Question once and for all.
    “No, Nazis collaborated with the Nazis.”
    At first they did, sure, but they were willing to kill any Jew that stayed in Europe and was not spirited to Palestine.
    Later, as the Final Solution progressed, they intended to kill not just the Jews of Europe but any Jews they could find in North Africa and the Levant too, according to recent documents. The Nazi plan just got more and more genocidal and nuts as time went on.
    When the Nazis got to Northern Africa, they started killing Jews. And they fully intended to drive through Egypt and into Palestine and maybe beyond to Iran. Their plans in Palestine were to kill all the Jews in Palestine. Unfortunately, the Mufti of Jerusalem was willing to cooperate on that.

  13. I disagree w/ the uses to which the holocaust has been put and some of the meanings others have drawn from it, but I don’t even see why the event stretches credulity. The Rwandan Hutus managed to kill hundreds of thousands of their Tutsi compatriots with nothing more than good organization and basic iron age weaponry. The Nanking massacre? 200,000 to 300,000 in three months w/ just guns, bayonets, swords, and fire.
    My sense is still that the soap and candles thing is probably myth, or at least not widespread. If nothing else, why would Nazis want to be rubbing Jewish fat on every inch of themselves?

  14. Is that the Deniers’ argument? That the Holocaust stretches credulity? Hell, Hutus killed almost 1 million in just 3 weeks with, as you said, Iron Age tech. What’s so hard about killing 6 million over 5 years? Child’s play.
    As I said, the soap thing was strictly experimental, and the soap produced was in very small quantities and supposedly wasn’t even very good soap.

  15. Is that the Deniers’ argument? That the Holocaust stretches credulity? Hell, Hutus killed almost 1 million in just 3 weeks with, as you said, Iron Age tech. What’s so hard about killing 6 million over 5 years? Child’s play.
    Kinda makes you wonder why there were so many “survivors”, huh? If the Germans had wanted to kill all the Jews they had in their possession, they would have finished the job.

  16. RL: Actually, I do believe in the soap story, and there is excellent evidence for it.
    ——
    heg – How stupid and ignorant can you Robert Lindsay be?
    Not even the hardcore Yad Vashem jews “belive” in the sopa lie. Do you know why Robert? Ohhh … You are ignorant, but I will tell you why even the hardcore Yad Vashem holohoax jews don’t “belive” in the Soap lie – they have DNA-tested those “jew soaps” and guess what? It’s just another jewish lie.
    She is a jewess
    http://www.zundelsite.org/english/antiprop/jewish_soap/lipstadt.jpg
    Mid page, Jerusalem Post, it’s jewish
    http://www.revisionists.com/revisionism.html

  17. I will be preparing a post in response to this, hoff. I believe that soap was made from corpses at Nazi camps. We have photos of the soap and photos of the bodies to be made into soap. Further, studies have been done on the soap and they have proven that the soap was made of dead bodies. This was done at Danzig Anatomical Institute at the Stuthoff Camp in Poland. We also have testimonies of workers who worked at the lab making the soap.

  18. heg – How stupid and ignorant can you Robert Lindsay be?
    He’s not stupid. After all, he does possess a 140+ IQ. But wait – he provides no proof whatsover (even though he easily could do so).
    And neither do the Holocaust “survivors.”

  19. A lot of them survived and were hidden. Nice try though, Nazis. Almost only counts in horseshoes, atom bombs and Holocausts.
    Huh? I’m talking about the “survivors” in the camps. Why so many?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *